WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:06.000
It is Thursday, January 29, 2026. And if you're

00:00:06.000 --> 00:00:07.900
picturing the United States Senate right now,

00:00:08.000 --> 00:00:11.539
I want you to imagine a game of hot potato. Yeah,

00:00:11.539 --> 00:00:14.140
but not the fun kind. No, not the one you played

00:00:14.140 --> 00:00:16.000
in kindergarten. Oh, this is the really high

00:00:16.000 --> 00:00:18.039
stakes version. And instead of a potato, it's

00:00:18.039 --> 00:00:20.199
the funding for the Department of Homeland Security.

00:00:20.199 --> 00:00:22.440
And if this potato drops, the entire federal

00:00:22.440 --> 00:00:26.160
government shuts down. Welcome back to the deep

00:00:26.160 --> 00:00:30.800
dive. Today feels Well, it feels heavy. I'm looking

00:00:30.800 --> 00:00:33.340
at the stack of sources on the desk, and at first

00:00:33.340 --> 00:00:36.759
glance, it feels like this chaotic pile of bad

00:00:36.759 --> 00:00:39.939
news. We have a government shutdown looming where

00:00:39.939 --> 00:00:42.060
the leadership seems, I don't know, allergic

00:00:42.060 --> 00:00:44.520
to actually leading. We have what being called

00:00:44.520 --> 00:00:46.520
the mother of all trade deals happening halfway

00:00:46.520 --> 00:00:49.520
across the world. Without us. Without us. And

00:00:49.520 --> 00:00:51.899
then we have this fascinating and honestly kind

00:00:51.899 --> 00:00:54.840
of brutal look at why the Democratic Party is

00:00:54.840 --> 00:00:56.920
struggling to talk to normal voters. It sounds

00:00:56.920 --> 00:01:00.119
disjointed. I know you hear domestic budget squabbles,

00:01:00.500 --> 00:01:02.320
international macroeconomics, and then party

00:01:02.320 --> 00:01:04.340
identity politics. And you think, what connects

00:01:04.340 --> 00:01:07.459
these? But the mission for this deep dive is

00:01:07.459 --> 00:01:10.060
to connect those dots. Because what we're really

00:01:10.060 --> 00:01:12.500
looking at today is a split screen. I like that

00:01:12.500 --> 00:01:15.670
image. A split screen. Exactly. On one side of

00:01:15.670 --> 00:01:18.090
the screen, you've got Washington just paralyzed

00:01:18.090 --> 00:01:22.829
by tactical maneuvering and obsessively relitigating

00:01:22.829 --> 00:01:25.090
the past. And on the other side. On the other

00:01:25.090 --> 00:01:27.870
side, the global balance of power is shifting,

00:01:27.870 --> 00:01:30.250
and it isn't waiting for the US to get its act

00:01:30.250 --> 00:01:32.450
together. OK, so that is the thread we need to

00:01:32.450 --> 00:01:34.689
pull today. Let's start on the paralyzed side

00:01:34.689 --> 00:01:36.569
of the screen. Let's head to Capitol Hill. Right.

00:01:36.829 --> 00:01:39.269
The situation with Senate Majority Leader John

00:01:39.269 --> 00:01:44.189
Thune is, well, The reporting suggests it's unique.

00:01:44.469 --> 00:01:46.230
Unique is a polite way to put it. I mean, the

00:01:46.230 --> 00:01:48.170
core issue here is the budget, right? The government

00:01:48.170 --> 00:01:50.650
needs funding. And constitutionally, that's Congress's

00:01:50.650 --> 00:01:54.230
job, the power of the purse. Exactly. And usually,

00:01:54.569 --> 00:01:56.930
the Senate majority leader's job is to, well,

00:01:57.049 --> 00:01:58.950
lead the Senate in passing that legislation.

00:01:59.109 --> 00:02:01.129
But Thune has effectively thrown up his hands.

00:02:01.689 --> 00:02:04.250
The reports say he's refusing to negotiate. He's

00:02:04.250 --> 00:02:06.170
explicitly saying that's the president's job.

00:02:06.319 --> 00:02:09.280
And that's the hot potato. Thun is basically

00:02:09.280 --> 00:02:11.860
taking this stance that, OK, the power might

00:02:11.860 --> 00:02:15.719
be constitutional, but practically he wants Democrats

00:02:15.719 --> 00:02:18.340
to go talk to Donald Trump directly. He's trying

00:02:18.340 --> 00:02:20.680
to force a direct negotiation between them and

00:02:20.680 --> 00:02:23.080
the White House over the Department of Homeland

00:02:23.080 --> 00:02:26.699
Security, DHS. Yes. And this is where the strategy

00:02:26.699 --> 00:02:29.719
gets really twisty, because Senate Minority Leader

00:02:29.719 --> 00:02:32.500
Chuck Schumer, he has a counterplay. Right. He's

00:02:32.500 --> 00:02:35.139
looking at the board and saying, look, 96 percent

00:02:35.139 --> 00:02:37.560
of the government funding is agreed upon. Let's

00:02:37.560 --> 00:02:39.860
just pass that. We'll handle DHS and the border

00:02:39.860 --> 00:02:42.419
separately. Which sounds completely logical on

00:02:42.419 --> 00:02:45.500
paper. You know, isolate the radioactive part

00:02:45.500 --> 00:02:48.560
immigration, ICE, the border, and keep the lights

00:02:48.560 --> 00:02:50.599
on for the rest of the country. It prevents a

00:02:50.599 --> 00:02:52.979
total shutdown. It does. Yeah. But Thun is having

00:02:52.979 --> 00:02:55.060
none of it. because of leverage. It's all about

00:02:55.060 --> 00:02:58.560
leverage. Precisely. Thune understands the game

00:02:58.560 --> 00:03:00.319
board better than people give him credit for.

00:03:00.580 --> 00:03:02.840
He knows that if he agrees to split the bills,

00:03:03.039 --> 00:03:04.860
he loses all his power. He gives up the whole

00:03:04.860 --> 00:03:06.400
game. The rest of the government gets funded

00:03:06.400 --> 00:03:09.219
and suddenly the Democrats have zero incentive

00:03:09.219 --> 00:03:12.719
to give Republicans what they want on DHS. Yeah.

00:03:12.719 --> 00:03:14.199
If the Parks Department and the Pentagon are

00:03:14.199 --> 00:03:16.780
funded, the pressure's off. Democrats can just

00:03:16.780 --> 00:03:19.139
let the DHS funding hang there forever. And Thune

00:03:19.139 --> 00:03:22.270
knows that If he allows that to happen, if he

00:03:22.270 --> 00:03:25.430
gives up that leverage, it will, well, the sources

00:03:25.430 --> 00:03:27.710
say it will infuriate Donald Trump. The reporting

00:03:27.710 --> 00:03:30.150
says he's scared to death of that scenario. He

00:03:30.150 --> 00:03:32.819
doesn't want to be the one who folded. So we're

00:03:32.819 --> 00:03:34.979
heading toward a standoff. And here's the trap.

00:03:35.000 --> 00:03:39.120
OK. If the government shuts down over this specific

00:03:39.120 --> 00:03:41.659
slice of funding, the Republican narrative is

00:03:41.659 --> 00:03:43.539
already written. They'll just claim Democrats

00:03:43.539 --> 00:03:46.939
want to defund ICE. Which brings us to, I think,

00:03:47.080 --> 00:03:49.560
the most fascinating piece of political analysis

00:03:49.560 --> 00:03:54.159
in our stack today, because defund ICE is a politically

00:03:54.159 --> 00:03:57.340
toxic accusation. Oh, it is. But the Democrats

00:03:57.340 --> 00:03:59.659
might actually have a counter move this time.

00:03:59.770 --> 00:04:02.210
I was digging into this report from the Searchlight

00:04:02.210 --> 00:04:04.949
Institute, their democratic think tank, and they're

00:04:04.949 --> 00:04:08.860
pushing this concept called popularism. Popularism

00:04:08.860 --> 00:04:10.860
is such an interesting framework. It almost sounds

00:04:10.860 --> 00:04:13.659
redundant, like, shouldn't politicians do popular

00:04:13.659 --> 00:04:16.660
things? But in our current climate, it's actually

00:04:16.660 --> 00:04:19.639
radical. It basically means advocating for policies

00:04:19.639 --> 00:04:21.920
that are actually popular with a majority of

00:04:21.920 --> 00:04:24.920
voters rather than, you know, prioritizing things

00:04:24.920 --> 00:04:28.480
that satisfy ideological purity or the activist

00:04:28.480 --> 00:04:30.639
base. And Searchlight just dropped a poll that

00:04:30.639 --> 00:04:33.399
completely upends that defund ICE narrative.

00:04:33.500 --> 00:04:35.699
The numbers are just wild. They are. They found

00:04:35.699 --> 00:04:40.240
that 58 % of voters want to reform ICE, not abolish

00:04:40.240 --> 00:04:43.300
it. And when you look at independents, you know,

00:04:43.379 --> 00:04:46.000
the people who actually decide elections. Swing

00:04:46.000 --> 00:04:49.160
voters. Yeah, the swing voters. 35 % of them

00:04:49.160 --> 00:04:52.240
favor reform over any other option. So the big

00:04:52.240 --> 00:04:54.899
insight here is that the defund slogan was a

00:04:54.899 --> 00:04:57.980
total disaster, but reform is a winner. That's

00:04:57.980 --> 00:05:00.720
it exactly. Voters want border security. They

00:05:00.720 --> 00:05:02.860
want deportation of undocumented immigrants.

00:05:03.040 --> 00:05:05.579
The data is really clear on that. But... And

00:05:05.579 --> 00:05:07.920
this is a key nuance. They're uncomfortable with

00:05:07.920 --> 00:05:10.379
the tactics. So things like warrants. Warrants

00:05:10.379 --> 00:05:13.000
for entering homes. They want officers to wear

00:05:13.000 --> 00:05:15.060
uniforms and identification. They want to bar

00:05:15.060 --> 00:05:17.480
the detention of U .S. citizens. Basic stuff.

00:05:17.680 --> 00:05:20.860
So the strategy Searchlight is proposing is for

00:05:20.860 --> 00:05:24.060
Democrats to say, fine, we'll fund DHS. We aren't

00:05:24.060 --> 00:05:26.560
defunding anything, but we will only release

00:05:26.560 --> 00:05:29.060
the money if you pass these specific reforms.

00:05:29.279 --> 00:05:31.399
It flips the script. Instead of being the party

00:05:31.399 --> 00:05:34.319
of abolish, which sounds, you know, chaotic.

00:05:35.100 --> 00:05:37.560
They become the party of accountability. And

00:05:37.560 --> 00:05:40.879
that forces Republicans to explain why they oppose

00:05:40.879 --> 00:05:43.660
requiring a warrant to enter a home. Yeah, that's

00:05:43.660 --> 00:05:46.259
a tough position for a Republican to defend to

00:05:46.259 --> 00:05:48.459
a libertarian -leaning voter. No, we don't want

00:05:48.459 --> 00:05:51.199
warrants. It's tough. It is. The source notes

00:05:51.199 --> 00:05:54.029
that unlike Henry Clay... these strategists would

00:05:54.029 --> 00:05:57.750
rather be president than be right in some academic

00:05:57.750 --> 00:06:00.170
sense. It's about winning. Meeting voters where

00:06:00.170 --> 00:06:01.829
they are. Meeting voters where they are. Hold

00:06:01.829 --> 00:06:03.449
that thought because we are definitely coming

00:06:03.449 --> 00:06:06.089
back to that. But first, speaking of unpopular

00:06:06.089 --> 00:06:08.370
positions and hard tactics, we have to pivot

00:06:08.370 --> 00:06:11.410
to the executive branch. OK. Because while Congress

00:06:11.410 --> 00:06:15.149
is in this staring contest, the FBI is making

00:06:15.149 --> 00:06:17.449
moves down in Georgia. This is the story out

00:06:17.449 --> 00:06:19.949
of Fulton County. And frankly, this reads less

00:06:19.949 --> 00:06:22.649
like a political update and more like I don't

00:06:22.649 --> 00:06:25.790
know, a legal thriller? It really does. Yesterday,

00:06:26.189 --> 00:06:28.970
the FBI executed a search warrant at the Fulton

00:06:28.970 --> 00:06:31.449
County elections office. And this wasn't some

00:06:31.449 --> 00:06:34.250
random inquiry. This was directed by Cash Patel.

00:06:34.610 --> 00:06:37.209
And driven, according to our sources, by Donald

00:06:37.209 --> 00:06:39.730
Trump's lingering obsession with the 2020 election.

00:06:39.790 --> 00:06:42.889
It is 2026. I know. We are six years removed

00:06:42.889 --> 00:06:45.509
from that election. We are. But the grievance,

00:06:45.509 --> 00:06:48.269
it remains the central operating principle for

00:06:48.269 --> 00:06:50.680
the former president. The source points out that

00:06:50.680 --> 00:06:54.300
despite the Georgia Secretary of State, a Republican.

00:06:54.319 --> 00:06:57.079
Right, a Republican. And multiple judges all

00:06:57.079 --> 00:06:59.360
saying there was no fraud. The administration

00:06:59.360 --> 00:07:01.980
is using federal law enforcement to go in and

00:07:01.980 --> 00:07:04.939
inspect 2020 records. There was a detail in the

00:07:04.939 --> 00:07:07.339
reporting that just gave me chills. The fear

00:07:07.339 --> 00:07:09.180
among the election officials isn't just that

00:07:09.180 --> 00:07:11.620
the FBI is looking, it's what happens if they

00:07:11.620 --> 00:07:13.639
seize the ballots. You break the chain of custody.

00:07:13.860 --> 00:07:15.740
Exactly. They could physically destroy the margin

00:07:15.740 --> 00:07:20.399
of victory. The 11 ,780 votes. Yes. If those

00:07:20.399 --> 00:07:22.879
ballots disappear or if they're compromised.

00:07:23.149 --> 00:07:25.850
They can claim a retroactive victory. They can

00:07:25.850 --> 00:07:28.490
say, see, the evidence is gone. The count was

00:07:28.490 --> 00:07:31.509
wrong. I won. It's pure score settling. And you

00:07:31.509 --> 00:07:33.430
have to look at the personnel moves to really

00:07:33.430 --> 00:07:36.730
understand how this happened. The top FBI agent

00:07:36.730 --> 00:07:40.089
in Atlanta, Paul Brown, was replaced just a week

00:07:40.089 --> 00:07:42.269
before this raid. That is not a coincidence.

00:07:42.610 --> 00:07:45.329
It just can't be. It suggests a clearing of the

00:07:45.329 --> 00:07:47.610
decks. They needed someone in place who would

00:07:47.610 --> 00:07:50.689
ensure this operation went forward without any

00:07:50.689 --> 00:07:54.889
internal resistance. It's just using the machinery

00:07:54.889 --> 00:07:57.930
of government to relitigate the past. So you

00:07:57.930 --> 00:07:59.870
had the executive branch looking backward at

00:07:59.870 --> 00:08:03.089
2020. Meanwhile, in the House, the Democrats

00:08:03.089 --> 00:08:04.790
are trying to use their own limited machinery

00:08:04.790 --> 00:08:06.889
to go after the current administration. Right.

00:08:06.949 --> 00:08:09.569
The impeachment of DHS Secretary Kristi Noem.

00:08:09.750 --> 00:08:11.980
This is the violence unleashed resolution. Over

00:08:11.980 --> 00:08:14.720
160 Democrats have cosigned it. They're charging

00:08:14.720 --> 00:08:17.360
that her management of DHS has led to violence

00:08:17.360 --> 00:08:19.480
against the American people. But we have to be

00:08:19.480 --> 00:08:21.480
realistic about the math here. Democrats are

00:08:21.480 --> 00:08:23.139
in the minority in the House. They can't actually

00:08:23.139 --> 00:08:25.379
remove her, can they? No, not a chance. Even

00:08:25.379 --> 00:08:27.459
if they passed it in the House, they need a two

00:08:27.459 --> 00:08:30.660
thirds vote in the Senate to convict. That is

00:08:30.660 --> 00:08:33.440
mathematically impossible. So the strategy isn't

00:08:33.440 --> 00:08:36.980
removal. It's something else. It's exposure.

00:08:37.419 --> 00:08:39.539
Because it's a privileged resolution, they can

00:08:39.539 --> 00:08:41.720
force a floor vote. They can make everyone vote.

00:08:41.879 --> 00:08:43.740
They can force every single member of the House

00:08:43.740 --> 00:08:45.700
to go on the record. So it's strategic theater.

00:08:45.899 --> 00:08:48.740
It is, but strategic theater has consequences.

00:08:49.440 --> 00:08:51.500
First, it shows their base they're fighting.

00:08:52.080 --> 00:08:55.100
But more importantly, it puts every single House

00:08:55.100 --> 00:08:58.840
Republican in a bind. Because they have to vote

00:08:58.840 --> 00:09:02.159
to support Noem. And if she continues to be unpopular...

00:09:02.139 --> 00:09:04.620
and her approval ratings are really sliding,

00:09:05.059 --> 00:09:07.120
that vote becomes an anchor around their necks

00:09:07.120 --> 00:09:08.840
in the midterms. And there was a little crack

00:09:08.840 --> 00:09:11.039
in the armor mentioned in the source that I found

00:09:11.039 --> 00:09:14.080
really interesting. The retiring Republicans.

00:09:14.360 --> 00:09:16.580
Yes. People like Tom Tillis or Thomas Massey,

00:09:16.580 --> 00:09:19.519
they're leaving Congress. They don't fear Trump's

00:09:19.519 --> 00:09:21.100
wrath anymore because they aren't running for

00:09:21.100 --> 00:09:22.980
reelection. They have nothing to lose. Nothing

00:09:22.980 --> 00:09:25.500
to lose. And if even one or two of them vote

00:09:25.500 --> 00:09:27.740
for impeachment as a sort of parting shot or

00:09:27.740 --> 00:09:30.139
just to clear their conscience, it becomes a

00:09:30.139 --> 00:09:33.059
bipartisan rebuke. And that's a headline the

00:09:33.059 --> 00:09:35.059
White House desperately wants to avoid. It would

00:09:35.059 --> 00:09:37.919
be deeply embarrassing for Noam. OK, so let's

00:09:37.919 --> 00:09:40.840
pause and look at the US side of the board. We

00:09:40.840 --> 00:09:43.279
have the House playing offense with impeachment.

00:09:43.639 --> 00:09:45.779
We have the Senate playing defense with a budget

00:09:45.779 --> 00:09:48.799
standoff. And we have the White House playing

00:09:49.049 --> 00:09:51.669
What time travel back to 2020? It's a picture

00:09:51.669 --> 00:09:54.950
of total internal obsession. Everyone is looking

00:09:54.950 --> 00:09:57.309
inward. Everyone is fighting over the scraps

00:09:57.309 --> 00:09:59.929
of power inside the Beltway. And this is where

00:09:59.929 --> 00:10:02.690
we have to switch screens because while we are

00:10:02.690 --> 00:10:05.710
obsessed with Fulton County ballots and ICE funding,

00:10:06.450 --> 00:10:09.509
the rest of the world. It isn't waiting. No,

00:10:09.529 --> 00:10:12.250
it's moving on. And this is the most critical

00:10:12.250 --> 00:10:14.450
part of today's deep dive. And it's the story

00:10:14.450 --> 00:10:16.769
getting the least amount of coverage. The mother

00:10:16.769 --> 00:10:19.230
of all trade deals. Ursula von der Leyen, the

00:10:19.230 --> 00:10:21.129
president of the European Commission, is in India

00:10:21.129 --> 00:10:23.129
right now. And she's not there for a photo op.

00:10:23.169 --> 00:10:25.730
She is finalizing a massive agreement between

00:10:25.730 --> 00:10:27.929
the EU and India. We're talking about a trade

00:10:27.929 --> 00:10:30.909
zone covering two billion people. Two billion

00:10:30.909 --> 00:10:33.690
people. Just think about the scale of that market

00:10:33.690 --> 00:10:35.990
for a second and notice who isn't in the room.

00:10:36.230 --> 00:10:38.960
The United States. We're completely cut out.

00:10:39.259 --> 00:10:40.879
Completely. And this is not an accident. This

00:10:40.879 --> 00:10:43.340
is the direct consequence of the America First

00:10:43.340 --> 00:10:46.500
policy, especially the tariffs. The source is

00:10:46.500 --> 00:10:49.940
very blunt about this. How so? Trump's unpredictability

00:10:49.940 --> 00:10:51.919
foreign leaders are reportedly referring to him

00:10:51.919 --> 00:10:54.899
as a mad king has forced the rest of the world

00:10:54.899 --> 00:10:58.019
to build an economic architecture that just doesn't

00:10:58.019 --> 00:11:00.379
rely on America anymore. I was really struck

00:11:00.379 --> 00:11:03.159
by the specific economic examples in the report.

00:11:03.600 --> 00:11:06.679
This isn't just abstract soft power. No, this

00:11:06.679 --> 00:11:09.299
is real money. It's German car manufacturers

00:11:09.299 --> 00:11:11.259
losing money in the U .S. market because of our

00:11:11.259 --> 00:11:14.299
tariffs. So what do they do? They don't just

00:11:14.299 --> 00:11:16.559
eat the loss. No, they pivot. They look at the

00:11:16.559 --> 00:11:18.539
map and they see India. They see South America.

00:11:18.639 --> 00:11:21.200
I mean, the EU just signed a deal with Mercosur,

00:11:21.360 --> 00:11:23.720
the South American trading bloc. They're offsetting

00:11:23.720 --> 00:11:26.379
their losses in the U .S. by opening up markets

00:11:26.379 --> 00:11:28.799
everywhere else. And that's the real danger,

00:11:28.860 --> 00:11:31.000
isn't it? Once those supply chains shift, they

00:11:31.000 --> 00:11:33.809
don't just snap back into place. Exactly. It

00:11:33.809 --> 00:11:36.129
takes years to build these relationships, these

00:11:36.129 --> 00:11:39.450
logistics. Once a German car company builds a

00:11:39.450 --> 00:11:42.629
factory in India or Brazil to serve those markets,

00:11:42.950 --> 00:11:44.509
they aren't going to shut it down just because

00:11:44.509 --> 00:11:46.730
the U .S. changes its mind four years from now.

00:11:46.769 --> 00:11:49.110
And it's not just manufacturing. It's the tech

00:11:49.110 --> 00:11:52.309
sector, too. The source mentioned European companies

00:11:52.309 --> 00:11:55.870
are prioritizing Airbus over Boeing, which is

00:11:55.870 --> 00:11:59.730
not new. Right. but they're also actively moving

00:11:59.730 --> 00:12:02.889
away from American software giants like Microsoft

00:12:02.889 --> 00:12:06.629
and Oracle over data privacy concerns. It's a

00:12:06.629 --> 00:12:08.710
decoupling. We talk a lot in Washington about

00:12:08.710 --> 00:12:10.649
decoupling from China, but what we are seeing

00:12:10.649 --> 00:12:13.210
here is the world decoupling from the United

00:12:13.210 --> 00:12:15.539
States. Wow. Indian Prime Minister Modi looks

00:12:15.539 --> 00:12:18.620
at the global board and he sees the EU as a stable,

00:12:18.980 --> 00:12:20.840
predictable partner. He knows what the rules

00:12:20.840 --> 00:12:22.860
are. As opposed to the US, where he has to worry

00:12:22.860 --> 00:12:25.320
about a sudden tweet changing the entire deal

00:12:25.320 --> 00:12:27.480
overnight. Precisely. There was a quote from

00:12:27.480 --> 00:12:29.399
a European diplomat in the source material that

00:12:29.399 --> 00:12:31.600
was just savage. What'd they say? They said,

00:12:31.919 --> 00:12:33.879
we cannot have the security of Europe depend

00:12:33.879 --> 00:12:37.059
on 4 ,000 voters in Wisconsin every four years.

00:12:37.379 --> 00:12:40.299
Oof. I mean, it hurts to hear, but can you blame

00:12:40.299 --> 00:12:42.620
them? You really can't. It's a rational calculation.

00:12:42.980 --> 00:12:44.919
They are hedging their bets against American

00:12:44.919 --> 00:12:48.580
instability and the cost to us. It isn't just

00:12:48.580 --> 00:12:52.340
prestige, it's markets. It's jobs. It's the dollar

00:12:52.340 --> 00:12:54.820
status as the reserve currency. It feels like

00:12:54.820 --> 00:12:57.759
we are sleepwalking into irrelevance while we

00:12:57.759 --> 00:12:59.779
argue about who gets to count the ballots in

00:12:59.779 --> 00:13:02.500
one county in Georgia. That is the danger. We

00:13:02.500 --> 00:13:05.340
are so focused on the internal fight, the hot

00:13:05.340 --> 00:13:07.879
potato, that we aren't even noticing the external

00:13:07.879 --> 00:13:10.500
walls going up all around us. Speaking of internal

00:13:10.500 --> 00:13:13.120
fights. We have to talk about the Democrats again.

00:13:13.360 --> 00:13:15.620
We touched on that popularism idea earlier. Yeah,

00:13:15.720 --> 00:13:18.559
doing what's popular. But there's a deeper identity

00:13:18.559 --> 00:13:21.419
crisis happening that explains why they struggle

00:13:21.419 --> 00:13:23.820
with that so much. There is. And we can kind

00:13:23.820 --> 00:13:25.600
of look at it through the lens of a specific

00:13:25.600 --> 00:13:28.000
race down in Florida. Alexander Vindman, you

00:13:28.000 --> 00:13:30.000
remember him? Of course. The impeachment witness,

00:13:30.379 --> 00:13:32.639
L .T. Curl Vindman. He's running for Senate in

00:13:32.639 --> 00:13:36.379
Florida against Ashley Moody. He is. And he raised

00:13:36.379 --> 00:13:40.690
$1 .7 million in 24 hours. That's a record -breaking

00:13:40.690 --> 00:13:43.250
number for a rollout. So the enthusiasm is there.

00:13:43.450 --> 00:13:46.690
The money is there. But the state is still...

00:13:46.539 --> 00:13:49.519
Solid Republican. Exactly. And this brings us

00:13:49.519 --> 00:13:51.940
to the analysis by Thomas Edsall and Noah Smith

00:13:51.940 --> 00:13:54.639
in our source deck. They argue that while individual

00:13:54.639 --> 00:13:56.879
candidates like Vindman can raise tons of cash

00:13:56.879 --> 00:13:59.779
from the base, the Democratic brand itself is

00:13:59.779 --> 00:14:02.600
deeply unpopular with the working class. The

00:14:02.600 --> 00:14:05.080
numbers on this were just staggering. Six in

00:14:05.080 --> 00:14:07.879
10 working class voters view the party negatively.

00:14:08.200 --> 00:14:10.100
And the authors did this linguistic analysis

00:14:10.100 --> 00:14:12.600
that I found so telling. Oh, the vocabulary shift.

00:14:12.759 --> 00:14:14.860
It's fascinating data. Tell me about it. They

00:14:14.860 --> 00:14:17.620
looked at Democratic messaging since 2012. Usage

00:14:17.620 --> 00:14:20.960
of words like equity went up over 700 percent.

00:14:21.159 --> 00:14:24.220
Usage of LGBT and related terms went up over

00:14:24.220 --> 00:14:26.019
a thousand percent. OK, so they're talking more

00:14:26.019 --> 00:14:28.120
about social justice. That makes sense. But look

00:14:28.120 --> 00:14:30.279
at what they stopped talking about. In that same

00:14:30.279 --> 00:14:32.659
period, usage of the word responsibility dropped

00:14:32.659 --> 00:14:35.860
83 percent. Usage of the phrase middle class

00:14:35.860 --> 00:14:39.419
dropped 79 percent. That is a massive drop. It

00:14:39.419 --> 00:14:42.820
just it paints a picture of a party that has

00:14:42.820 --> 00:14:46.039
shifted its focus. entirely to identity groups

00:14:46.039 --> 00:14:48.799
and away from these universal themes like duty

00:14:48.799 --> 00:14:51.019
and economics. And the perception among working

00:14:51.019 --> 00:14:53.740
class voters, and this is white, black, and Hispanic

00:14:53.740 --> 00:14:57.299
voters, is that the party is, to quote the source,

00:14:57.700 --> 00:15:00.600
woke, weak, and out of touch. They hear the language

00:15:00.600 --> 00:15:03.000
change and they feel excluded. There was a specific

00:15:03.000 --> 00:15:05.620
example given that really nailed this for me.

00:15:06.080 --> 00:15:08.679
It was about how President Biden announced his

00:15:08.679 --> 00:15:11.000
Supreme Court pick a few years ago. Right. He

00:15:11.000 --> 00:15:12.779
announced he would only consider a black woman

00:15:12.779 --> 00:15:14.659
for the seat. Now, to be clear, the critique

00:15:14.659 --> 00:15:16.759
isn't about picking a black woman. The candidate

00:15:16.759 --> 00:15:19.360
he picked was eminently qualified. The critique

00:15:19.360 --> 00:15:21.419
is about the framing. So if he had just said,

00:15:21.659 --> 00:15:23.039
I'm going to look at everyone and pick the best

00:15:23.039 --> 00:15:25.370
person and then. pick the exact same candidate.

00:15:25.629 --> 00:15:28.669
The message is excellence. It implies she beat

00:15:28.669 --> 00:15:31.549
out everyone else. But by ruling everyone else

00:15:31.549 --> 00:15:33.929
out beforehand, the message that so many voters

00:15:33.929 --> 00:15:35.850
heard, especially those working class voters

00:15:35.850 --> 00:15:38.110
the Democrats are hemorrhaging, was exclusion.

00:15:38.429 --> 00:15:40.570
It goes right back to that Searchlight Institute

00:15:40.570 --> 00:15:43.169
poll, doesn't it? Yeah. It's the difference between

00:15:43.169 --> 00:15:45.830
being an ideological movement and a political

00:15:45.830 --> 00:15:48.070
party. That is the fundamental tension right

00:15:48.070 --> 00:15:50.860
there. An ideological movement wants to change

00:15:50.860 --> 00:15:53.200
the language. It wants to change the culture.

00:15:53.659 --> 00:15:57.379
It prioritizes purity and correctness. But a

00:15:57.379 --> 00:15:59.320
political party's job is different. Completely

00:15:59.320 --> 00:16:02.000
different. Its job is to build a coalition big

00:16:02.000 --> 00:16:05.179
enough to win 50 % plus one of the vote. And

00:16:05.179 --> 00:16:07.080
to do that, you have to talk about things like

00:16:07.080 --> 00:16:10.570
the middle class and responsibility. So the analysis

00:16:10.570 --> 00:16:12.850
suggests they've become excellent at being a

00:16:12.850 --> 00:16:15.289
movement and increasingly bad at being a party.

00:16:15.509 --> 00:16:17.350
They are winning the argument on Twitter and

00:16:17.350 --> 00:16:20.149
losing the vote in Florida. So if we pull all

00:16:20.149 --> 00:16:23.789
of this together, if we look at that whole split

00:16:23.789 --> 00:16:26.529
screen. What are we really looking at? We're

00:16:26.529 --> 00:16:29.350
looking at a system under stress from every conceivable

00:16:29.350 --> 00:16:32.409
angle. You have a Republican party led by a figure

00:16:32.409 --> 00:16:34.850
who is so obsessed with the past, he's using

00:16:34.850 --> 00:16:37.190
the FBI to chase ghosts in Georgia. You have

00:16:37.190 --> 00:16:39.110
a Senate leadership that's terrified of his own

00:16:39.110 --> 00:16:42.090
base, which leads to total paralysis on the budget.

00:16:42.330 --> 00:16:44.789
And you have a Democratic party that is trying

00:16:44.789 --> 00:16:47.509
to figure out how to talk to normal people again

00:16:47.509 --> 00:16:49.850
without getting canceled by its own activists.

00:16:50.169 --> 00:16:52.590
And while all of this is happening, while we

00:16:52.590 --> 00:16:55.639
are gazing at our own navel, The global economy

00:16:55.639 --> 00:16:59.179
is being rewired by Europe and India to exclude

00:16:59.179 --> 00:17:03.019
us. It's a lot. It really is. It is. But that's

00:17:03.019 --> 00:17:05.619
why we do the deep dive. To see the whole board.

00:17:06.000 --> 00:17:07.599
Because if you only look at the headlines about

00:17:07.599 --> 00:17:10.039
the shutdown, you miss the trade deal. And if

00:17:10.039 --> 00:17:11.700
you only look at the trade deal, you miss the

00:17:11.700 --> 00:17:13.880
voter sentiment shifts that made that possible

00:17:13.880 --> 00:17:16.119
in the first place. And hopefully you realize

00:17:16.119 --> 00:17:19.690
that this game of hot potato has real... lasting

00:17:19.690 --> 00:17:21.789
consequences. The world isn't waiting for us

00:17:21.789 --> 00:17:23.990
to finish the game. That is the thought I want

00:17:23.990 --> 00:17:26.710
to leave you with today. If the U .S. continues

00:17:26.710 --> 00:17:29.490
to turn inward with trade wars and backward with

00:17:29.490 --> 00:17:32.650
election re -litigation, how long until America

00:17:32.650 --> 00:17:35.410
first actually results in America being last

00:17:35.410 --> 00:17:37.369
in the room where the decisions are made? It's

00:17:37.369 --> 00:17:38.829
a question we might be answering sooner than

00:17:38.829 --> 00:17:40.950
we think. Thanks for listening to the Deep Dive.

00:17:41.250 --> 00:17:41.930
We'll see you next time.
