WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:03.240
Welcome to the deep dive. Today, we're going

00:00:03.240 --> 00:00:05.459
to push past all the noise from the recent headlines

00:00:05.459 --> 00:00:09.199
and really look at the strategic shifts, both

00:00:09.199 --> 00:00:12.060
political and legal, that are shaping what comes

00:00:12.060 --> 00:00:14.259
next. Exactly. We're not just looking at who

00:00:14.259 --> 00:00:16.100
won the last round. We're asking who's being

00:00:16.100 --> 00:00:18.989
set up to win the next one. That's the key. And

00:00:18.989 --> 00:00:21.309
our sources today are pretty varied. We're covering

00:00:21.309 --> 00:00:23.710
the fallout from the government shutdown, some

00:00:23.710 --> 00:00:26.370
truly explosive political revelations, and even

00:00:26.370 --> 00:00:28.510
a surge in new candidates. And we're setting

00:00:28.510 --> 00:00:30.730
all of that against a pretty stark historical

00:00:30.730 --> 00:00:33.810
warning for the 2026 midterms. So our mission

00:00:33.810 --> 00:00:35.969
for you is to pull out those essential nuggets

00:00:35.969 --> 00:00:38.649
of strategy and risk. We want you to see the

00:00:38.649 --> 00:00:40.990
machinery working behind the scenes. Let's start

00:00:40.990 --> 00:00:44.409
with the end of that marathon 43 -day government

00:00:44.409 --> 00:00:46.840
shutdown. Right. And the vote that ended it,

00:00:46.939 --> 00:00:49.759
hashtag, tag, tag, I, the aftermath of the government

00:00:49.759 --> 00:00:52.520
shutdown. So the stopgap bill, it passed the

00:00:52.520 --> 00:00:55.840
House 222 to 209. And if you look at the vote

00:00:55.840 --> 00:00:57.320
breakdown, you can immediately see where the

00:00:57.320 --> 00:00:59.179
pressure points are. Let's start with the Democrats.

00:00:59.539 --> 00:01:01.960
The six Democrats who crossed the aisle to vote

00:01:01.960 --> 00:01:04.739
with Republicans. Yeah, these are people like.

00:01:05.500 --> 00:01:09.120
Henry Kuehler from Texas or Marie Lusencamp Perez

00:01:09.120 --> 00:01:11.480
from Washington. And they represent, you know,

00:01:11.560 --> 00:01:14.299
the real front lines of competitive politics.

00:01:14.680 --> 00:01:16.780
And what's the common thread there? It's their

00:01:16.780 --> 00:01:19.420
districts. Every single one has a partisan voter

00:01:19.420 --> 00:01:23.099
index or PBI rating of R plus one to R plus four.

00:01:23.159 --> 00:01:25.060
So they're Democrats operating in territory that

00:01:25.060 --> 00:01:27.900
leans Republican. Constantly. So for them, a

00:01:27.900 --> 00:01:30.239
vote like this is about showing independence

00:01:30.239 --> 00:01:33.439
from the party on spending. It's a survival tactic.

00:01:33.659 --> 00:01:35.400
And then you have the flip side, which is maybe

00:01:35.400 --> 00:01:38.019
even more interesting. Two Republicans crossed

00:01:38.019 --> 00:01:40.260
over to vote with the Democrats. Which is highly

00:01:40.260 --> 00:01:42.620
unusual on a big spending bill like this. One

00:01:42.620 --> 00:01:45.299
was Thomas Massey, who, you know, is a known

00:01:45.299 --> 00:01:48.680
iconoclast. He votes against almost all big spending.

00:01:48.760 --> 00:01:50.939
Right. That's his brand. But the other one. The

00:01:50.939 --> 00:01:53.969
other was Greg Stube. a conservative from a super

00:01:53.969 --> 00:01:57.629
red R plus 11 district in Florida. He had zero

00:01:57.629 --> 00:01:59.969
electoral reason to vote no. So what was his

00:01:59.969 --> 00:02:02.030
motivation? It wasn't about the spending in general.

00:02:02.469 --> 00:02:04.409
No, he was very specific. He said he was opposing

00:02:04.409 --> 00:02:08.449
a self -indulgent provision that he felt allowed

00:02:08.449 --> 00:02:10.669
certain senators to sue the Justice Department

00:02:10.669 --> 00:02:13.009
using taxpayer money. He called it. Garbage.

00:02:13.189 --> 00:02:15.229
And the reaction from his own side. Oh, it was

00:02:15.229 --> 00:02:17.930
immediate and intense. The online vitriol was

00:02:17.930 --> 00:02:20.990
incredible. He was called a rhino, a traitor.

00:02:21.530 --> 00:02:23.629
The whole playbook. Which really says a lot about

00:02:23.629 --> 00:02:25.930
the internal party dynamics right now. It does.

00:02:26.189 --> 00:02:28.270
They were even attacking him for a Senate race

00:02:28.270 --> 00:02:30.009
he isn't running in. I mean, he's a member of

00:02:30.009 --> 00:02:32.650
the House. It just showed how detached some of

00:02:32.650 --> 00:02:35.889
the outrage was. OK, so all this internal fracturing

00:02:35.889 --> 00:02:38.569
sets the stage for the big strategic question.

00:02:38.960 --> 00:02:41.740
Why do the Democrats ultimately surrender and

00:02:41.740 --> 00:02:44.520
end the shutdown? Some sources say that was the

00:02:44.520 --> 00:02:47.400
real victory. Right. This brings us to what Jonathan

00:02:47.400 --> 00:02:50.360
V. Last calls the touch the stove theory. I like

00:02:50.360 --> 00:02:52.379
the sound of that. It's really smart political

00:02:52.379 --> 00:02:54.960
thinking. JVL, who is a Republican critic of

00:02:54.960 --> 00:02:57.159
Trump, he argued that the absolute worst thing

00:02:57.159 --> 00:02:59.900
for Democrats would have been to win a big concession,

00:03:00.240 --> 00:03:02.419
like restoring health insurance subsidies until

00:03:02.419 --> 00:03:06.199
2026. Wait, hang on. Preventing huge health care

00:03:06.199 --> 00:03:09.889
hikes. How is that a bad outcome for Democrats?

00:03:10.030 --> 00:03:12.550
That feels counterintuitive. It is, but think

00:03:12.550 --> 00:03:15.150
about it. If you prevent a bad thing from happening,

00:03:15.669 --> 00:03:17.949
do voters give you credit for the crisis that

00:03:17.949 --> 00:03:20.400
didn't happen? Rarely. They just take the stability

00:03:20.400 --> 00:03:22.879
for granted. Exactly. By ending the shutdown

00:03:22.879 --> 00:03:25.879
without those subsidies, Trump and the GOP now

00:03:25.879 --> 00:03:28.979
have to own what comes next. And what comes next

00:03:28.979 --> 00:03:32.740
is rising health care costs for everyone. So

00:03:32.740 --> 00:03:34.740
the idea is that you only get political credit

00:03:34.740 --> 00:03:37.000
when voters actually feel the pain. Precisely.

00:03:37.120 --> 00:03:39.460
By the time the next midterms roll around, voters

00:03:39.460 --> 00:03:41.580
could have been paying way higher premiums for

00:03:41.580 --> 00:03:43.740
nearly a year. That pain, you know, touching

00:03:43.740 --> 00:03:46.240
that hot stove. That's what mobilizes your base

00:03:46.240 --> 00:03:48.120
and gives the other side a really difficult issue

00:03:48.120 --> 00:03:50.740
to defend. Hashtag tag two, the Epstein documents

00:03:50.740 --> 00:03:53.719
and legislative momentum. So just as the shutdown

00:03:53.719 --> 00:03:57.030
drama was fading. This absolute bombshell drops

00:03:57.030 --> 00:03:58.490
from House Democrats. We're talking about the

00:03:58.490 --> 00:04:00.569
Jeffrey Epstein emails. And the information in

00:04:00.569 --> 00:04:03.409
them was, well, it was staggering. The sources

00:04:03.409 --> 00:04:05.610
detail emails where Epstein wrote that Donald

00:04:05.610 --> 00:04:08.370
Trump knew about the girls. And that Trump spent

00:04:08.370 --> 00:04:11.610
hours at his house with Virginia Jeffrey. Right.

00:04:11.990 --> 00:04:14.610
And maybe the most damaging part, Epstein apparently

00:04:14.610 --> 00:04:17.600
remarked to Ghislaine Maxwell that it was amazing,

00:04:18.100 --> 00:04:20.540
no one had connected Trump to his whole operation.

00:04:21.019 --> 00:04:23.800
If that stands up, it changes the entire political

00:04:23.800 --> 00:04:26.720
landscape. And we saw an immediate legislative

00:04:26.720 --> 00:04:28.680
consequence, didn't we? Immediately. Yeah. This

00:04:28.680 --> 00:04:31.100
news just completely took over. It provided the

00:04:31.100 --> 00:04:35.379
political cover and the energy needed for the

00:04:35.379 --> 00:04:37.660
Massey bill discharge petition. And for anyone

00:04:37.660 --> 00:04:39.680
listening, a discharge petition is basically

00:04:39.680 --> 00:04:42.399
a way for members to force a vote on a bill that

00:04:42.399 --> 00:04:44.399
leadership is blocking. And that's what happened.

00:04:44.660 --> 00:04:47.759
A Democrat, a deleter - Alva cast her first ever

00:04:47.759 --> 00:04:51.199
vote, and it was the 218th signature needed.

00:04:51.439 --> 00:04:53.459
It forced the issue. So what's the outlook for

00:04:53.459 --> 00:04:55.639
that bill now? Well, under the rules, the petition

00:04:55.639 --> 00:04:58.839
has to ripen for seven legislative days. But

00:04:58.839 --> 00:05:00.879
Speaker Mike Johnson has already said he's going

00:05:00.879 --> 00:05:02.839
to schedule the vote quickly. So he's going to

00:05:02.839 --> 00:05:04.779
rip the Band -Aid off, so to speak. Why not just

00:05:04.779 --> 00:05:07.019
let it sit there? Because the longer he waits,

00:05:07.519 --> 00:05:10.360
the more the story hurts his party. And there's

00:05:10.360 --> 00:05:12.600
always the risk that more documents could leak.

00:05:12.779 --> 00:05:15.480
I mean, they have 23 ,000 pages from Epstein's

00:05:15.480 --> 00:05:18.660
lawyers. Wow. So by scheduling the vote, he manages

00:05:18.660 --> 00:05:21.240
the damage and gets it over with. House passage

00:05:21.240 --> 00:05:23.660
seems, I think, inevitable now. You'll probably

00:05:23.660 --> 00:05:25.800
see dozens of Republicans join in. But that's

00:05:25.800 --> 00:05:27.180
where it stops, right? It goes to the Senate

00:05:27.180 --> 00:05:29.060
and the majority leader soon doesn't have to

00:05:29.060 --> 00:05:31.540
bring it up for a vote. Correct. And even if

00:05:31.540 --> 00:05:34.079
it passed, the chance of Trump signing it is,

00:05:34.079 --> 00:05:37.459
as one source put it, approximately 0 .00 percent.

00:05:37.759 --> 00:05:39.920
So what's the real significance here if it's

00:05:39.920 --> 00:05:42.139
not going to become law? The significance is

00:05:42.139 --> 00:05:45.100
the political shift. Six months ago, the idea

00:05:45.100 --> 00:05:47.279
of the House passing this bill was pure fantasy.

00:05:47.759 --> 00:05:49.800
The fact that a few emails could force a vote

00:05:49.800 --> 00:05:52.740
this quickly, it just shows how fragile the whole

00:05:52.740 --> 00:05:55.319
system is to these kinds of revelations. This

00:05:55.319 --> 00:05:57.860
story is definitely not over. Hashtag tag tag

00:05:57.860 --> 00:06:00.480
three, the grassroots surge and new candidates.

00:06:01.060 --> 00:06:02.759
And that volatility we're talking about is being

00:06:02.759 --> 00:06:05.060
mirrored at the grassroots level. Our sources

00:06:05.060 --> 00:06:06.819
are pointing to something called the Momdani

00:06:06.819 --> 00:06:09.819
effect. Yeah, this is inspired by Zoran Mamdani's

00:06:09.819 --> 00:06:12.420
election as mayor of New York City, and the reason

00:06:12.420 --> 00:06:15.259
it was so galvanizing is the scale of the victory.

00:06:15.500 --> 00:06:17.920
Right, he's not just a mayor. He's overseeing

00:06:17.920 --> 00:06:21.660
an organization with 280 ,000 employees and,

00:06:21.660 --> 00:06:24.420
what, a $110 billion budget? A budget bigger

00:06:24.420 --> 00:06:27.360
than Target or Disney. It showed that a young,

00:06:27.519 --> 00:06:30.319
unconventional progressive could win a massive,

00:06:30.660 --> 00:06:33.339
powerful executive position. It made that kind

00:06:33.339 --> 00:06:35.660
of success feel viable. And the numbers back

00:06:35.660 --> 00:06:38.139
that up. Oh, absolutely. An organization called

00:06:38.139 --> 00:06:40.600
Run for Something, which helps young progressives,

00:06:40.899 --> 00:06:43.660
saw over 4 ,000 people sign up to run for office

00:06:43.660 --> 00:06:46.100
right after Mom Donnie's win. And that's on top

00:06:46.100 --> 00:06:48.939
of a surge of 10 ,000 earlier in the year. That's

00:06:48.939 --> 00:06:51.740
a huge wave of new energy. It is. But there is

00:06:51.740 --> 00:06:54.300
a cautionary note in the sources. One strategist

00:06:54.300 --> 00:06:56.319
warned you can't just clone Mom Donnie's campaign

00:06:56.319 --> 00:06:58.699
and drop it in, say, rural South Carolina. The

00:06:58.699 --> 00:07:00.939
message has to fit the place. Exactly. But the

00:07:00.939 --> 00:07:02.860
universal theme, the thing that seems to work

00:07:02.860 --> 00:07:05.360
everywhere, is this idea that the country is

00:07:05.360 --> 00:07:08.019
on the wrong track and current leaders are failing

00:07:08.019 --> 00:07:10.360
the people. And why is that specific message

00:07:10.360 --> 00:07:13.089
so powerful right now? Because it taps into this

00:07:13.089 --> 00:07:15.930
shared frustration with institutions. It doesn't

00:07:15.930 --> 00:07:17.810
matter if you're worried about health care costs

00:07:17.810 --> 00:07:21.029
in a city or the economy in a small town. It's

00:07:21.029 --> 00:07:23.629
an anti -establishment message that lets a candidate

00:07:23.629 --> 00:07:26.250
harness that national anger and apply it to local

00:07:26.250 --> 00:07:29.250
problems. Speaking of new energy, we have a huge

00:07:29.250 --> 00:07:32.230
new name entering the scene. John Bouvier Kennedy

00:07:32.230 --> 00:07:35.509
Schlossberg, JFK's grandson, is apparently running

00:07:35.509 --> 00:07:38.629
for Congress in New York. Right. And at 32, he

00:07:38.629 --> 00:07:41.589
gets compared to Mamdani, young, progressive,

00:07:41.870 --> 00:07:44.129
good on social media. But he comes with these

00:07:44.129 --> 00:07:46.670
incredible built -in advantages. The name, for

00:07:46.670 --> 00:07:49.250
one. The name, the Yale and Harvard law background,

00:07:49.410 --> 00:07:52.250
and crucially, access to basically every major

00:07:52.250 --> 00:07:55.170
Democratic donor in the country. He has the history

00:07:55.170 --> 00:07:57.350
and the momentum of the new guard all at once.

00:07:57.550 --> 00:07:59.870
He's a formidable candidate from day one. Right.

00:07:59.930 --> 00:08:02.129
Let's pivot to the next big election cycle, the

00:08:02.129 --> 00:08:05.310
2026 midterms and some of the risks brewing under

00:08:05.310 --> 00:08:08.019
the surface. The sources draw a really striking

00:08:08.019 --> 00:08:10.879
parallel to the 1894 midterms. What happened

00:08:10.879 --> 00:08:13.920
then? NC94 was a complete political bloodbath

00:08:13.920 --> 00:08:16.660
for the Democrats. They lost 114 house seats.

00:08:16.699 --> 00:08:19.699
That's 32 % of their entire caucus. Wow. Was

00:08:19.699 --> 00:08:21.959
that just the economy? The economy was a factor,

00:08:22.560 --> 00:08:24.579
sure, but the losses were made so much worse

00:08:24.579 --> 00:08:27.379
because Democrats had been, as the sources say,

00:08:27.519 --> 00:08:30.339
too greedy with their gerrymandering. They created

00:08:30.339 --> 00:08:32.980
what's called a dummymander. A dummymander. So

00:08:32.980 --> 00:08:34.899
the problem wasn't that the districts were bad.

00:08:35.179 --> 00:08:38.299
but that they were too perfect, too aggressive.

00:08:38.460 --> 00:08:40.720
That's the trap. They drew tons of districts

00:08:40.720 --> 00:08:44.539
with really thin margins like 53 % or 55 % to

00:08:44.539 --> 00:08:46.980
maximize their number of seats. But when the

00:08:46.980 --> 00:08:49.519
national mood shifted just a little bit, those

00:08:49.519 --> 00:08:52.159
thin margins collapsed everywhere all at once.

00:08:52.240 --> 00:08:54.720
Like a house of cards. Precisely. And the sources

00:08:54.720 --> 00:08:58.980
warn that 2026 could, well, it could rhyme with

00:08:58.980 --> 00:09:01.860
1894. What are the factors that are aligning

00:09:01.860 --> 00:09:04.500
to create that risk? It's sort of a four part

00:09:04.500 --> 00:09:07.669
problem. One. aggressive mid -decade gerrymandering,

00:09:08.049 --> 00:09:10.289
two, using bad data that doesn't account for

00:09:10.289 --> 00:09:13.049
shifting voter behavior, three, a very energized

00:09:13.049 --> 00:09:14.870
base, in this case, driven by negative feelings

00:09:14.870 --> 00:09:17.909
about Trump, and four, a weak economy. It's a

00:09:17.909 --> 00:09:19.690
dangerous mix. And we're already seeing some

00:09:19.690 --> 00:09:21.950
pushback against that aggressive map drawing,

00:09:22.409 --> 00:09:25.830
right, in Kansas? Yes, exactly. In Kansas, the

00:09:25.830 --> 00:09:28.549
GOP leadership tried to redraw the map to target

00:09:28.549 --> 00:09:31.389
Sharice David's D plus two district, but they

00:09:31.389 --> 00:09:34.389
needed a special session, and at least 10 Republicans

00:09:34.389 --> 00:09:37.250
refused. to go along with it. And there were

00:09:37.250 --> 00:09:39.590
consequences for that dissent. Big consequences.

00:09:40.190 --> 00:09:42.250
Leadership immediately stripped them of their

00:09:42.250 --> 00:09:44.809
committee chairmanships. One of them, Representative

00:09:44.809 --> 00:09:47.409
Clark Sanders, warned that the whole stunt just

00:09:47.409 --> 00:09:49.990
gives Democrats a club to beat us over the head

00:09:49.990 --> 00:09:53.450
with. It shows how high stakes the strategy is.

00:09:53.870 --> 00:09:56.389
Finally, let's look at the Supreme Court. They've

00:09:56.389 --> 00:09:59.169
agreed to hear a case out of Mississippi about

00:09:59.169 --> 00:10:01.960
late arriving absentee ballots. What are the

00:10:01.960 --> 00:10:04.419
stakes here? So, granting cert means the case

00:10:04.419 --> 00:10:08.179
is on, and the stakes are huge. The RNC is arguing

00:10:08.179 --> 00:10:10.419
that election day means all ballots have to be

00:10:10.419 --> 00:10:12.539
received by that day, even if they were postmarked

00:10:12.539 --> 00:10:14.500
earlier. And if the court agrees with that? It

00:10:14.500 --> 00:10:16.879
would upend voting procedures in more than a

00:10:16.879 --> 00:10:18.919
dozen states. It would invalidate millions of

00:10:18.919 --> 00:10:20.620
votes that are currently counted. And this is

00:10:20.620 --> 00:10:23.059
where overseas voters, especially the military,

00:10:23.440 --> 00:10:26.360
become a huge factor. A crucial factor. International

00:10:26.360 --> 00:10:29.919
mail can take weeks. You have active duty soldiers

00:10:29.919 --> 00:10:32.980
whose ballots, even if mailed on time, might

00:10:32.980 --> 00:10:35.580
not arrive until after Election Day. And taking

00:10:35.580 --> 00:10:37.580
away the right to vote from active duty soldiers

00:10:37.580 --> 00:10:40.919
is. It's a politically toxic look, to say the

00:10:40.919 --> 00:10:42.600
least. That's a point that will almost certainly

00:10:42.600 --> 00:10:45.080
come up in oral arguments and could really influence

00:10:45.080 --> 00:10:47.299
the court's thinking. So we've connected the

00:10:47.299 --> 00:10:49.759
dots. The fallout from the shutdown is creating

00:10:49.759 --> 00:10:52.620
future political pain. These document leaks are

00:10:52.620 --> 00:10:55.629
forcing immediate legislative action and new

00:10:55.629 --> 00:10:57.830
candidates are furnishing all this grassroots

00:10:57.830 --> 00:11:00.549
energy. And it's all happening against this backdrop

00:11:00.549 --> 00:11:03.649
of major structural risks like the Dummymander

00:11:03.649 --> 00:11:06.490
and these potential Supreme Court rulings. What's

00:11:06.490 --> 00:11:09.009
the final takeaway for you, our listener? The

00:11:09.009 --> 00:11:11.529
takeaway is this incredible convergence of volatility.

00:11:11.649 --> 00:11:14.750
You have these thinly drawn gerrymandered districts

00:11:14.750 --> 00:11:17.429
and you combine that with either super high voter

00:11:17.429 --> 00:11:19.850
turnout or voter suppression from a court ruling.

00:11:20.169 --> 00:11:22.710
Small shifts in sentiment could lead to massive

00:11:22.710 --> 00:11:25.250
unexpected outcomes. We could see another political

00:11:25.250 --> 00:11:27.970
shock, just like in 1894. Which leaves us with

00:11:27.970 --> 00:11:30.769
a final question for you to think about. If that

00:11:30.769 --> 00:11:33.409
political climate does shift dramatically, will

00:11:33.409 --> 00:11:35.830
these aggressive gerrymandering strategies we've

00:11:35.830 --> 00:11:38.830
talked about be seen, in hindsight, as the ultimate

00:11:38.830 --> 00:11:41.250
dummymander, the very thing that set the stage

00:11:41.250 --> 00:11:44.029
for a spectacular political collapse? Something

00:11:44.029 --> 00:11:45.110
for you to research further.
