WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:03.439
Welcome back to the Deep Dive. Today, we're jumping

00:00:03.439 --> 00:00:05.599
right into something that's really taken over

00:00:05.599 --> 00:00:08.820
the headlines. I mean, just dominated. The tragic

00:00:08.820 --> 00:00:11.080
killing of Charlie Kirk. It's shocking, obviously.

00:00:11.699 --> 00:00:14.320
But these moments, you know... as awful as they

00:00:14.320 --> 00:00:17.480
are, they often open these like stark windows

00:00:17.480 --> 00:00:20.000
into what's really going on deeper down in our

00:00:20.000 --> 00:00:22.000
society and politics. Absolutely. And that's

00:00:22.000 --> 00:00:24.320
what we're aiming for today. We've pulled together

00:00:24.320 --> 00:00:27.719
a lot of recent analysis, research, news reports.

00:00:28.019 --> 00:00:29.820
We're not just going to recite the facts you've

00:00:29.820 --> 00:00:32.340
already heard. We want to dig into the broader

00:00:32.340 --> 00:00:35.079
implications, really pull out the key insights

00:00:35.079 --> 00:00:37.420
so you get a fuller picture, you know, beyond

00:00:37.420 --> 00:00:39.560
just the breaking newsflash. OK, so let's start

00:00:39.560 --> 00:00:42.060
peeling back those layers, the immediate details

00:00:42.060 --> 00:00:45.450
around on the killing itself. The accused killer,

00:00:45.649 --> 00:00:49.250
Tyler Robinson, he hasn't confessed. That seems

00:00:49.250 --> 00:00:50.909
significant right off the bat. Yeah, it does.

00:00:50.969 --> 00:00:52.890
It tells you this isn't some open and shut case.

00:00:53.329 --> 00:00:55.090
But interestingly, while Robinson isn't talking,

00:00:55.149 --> 00:00:58.729
his roommate, Lance Twiggs, is. Twiggs, who shared

00:00:58.729 --> 00:01:00.570
an apartment with him in St. George, Utah, he's

00:01:00.570 --> 00:01:02.250
been cooperating fully with the authorities,

00:01:02.850 --> 00:01:05.250
turned over communications from Robinson. So

00:01:05.250 --> 00:01:07.709
Twiggs is cooperating. And then there were these,

00:01:07.709 --> 00:01:10.269
well, rumors, whispers about their relationship.

00:01:10.609 --> 00:01:12.980
What came out about that? Well, those whispers

00:01:12.980 --> 00:01:16.180
became official pretty quickly. Utah Governor

00:01:16.180 --> 00:01:18.859
Spencer Cox, he's a Republican, he publicly confirmed

00:01:18.859 --> 00:01:21.560
it. He stated that the suspect's roommate was

00:01:21.560 --> 00:01:23.840
indeed a boyfriend who is transitioning from

00:01:23.840 --> 00:01:27.099
male to female. Wow. Yeah. So that adds this

00:01:27.099 --> 00:01:29.359
whole new dimension, right? Investigators now

00:01:29.359 --> 00:01:33.569
have to ask, did Kirk's... very public, very

00:01:33.569 --> 00:01:37.230
strong anti -trans stance player role here. Governor

00:01:37.230 --> 00:01:39.549
Cox also mentioned Robinson's worldview seemed

00:01:39.549 --> 00:01:42.569
shaped by quote, very dark places of the internet.

00:01:42.870 --> 00:01:45.030
So you've got ideology potentially mixed into.

00:01:45.150 --> 00:01:47.730
That is a lot to process. It makes you think

00:01:47.730 --> 00:01:49.790
though, these huge shocking political events

00:01:49.790 --> 00:01:52.950
happen and then they seem to fade so fast from

00:01:52.950 --> 00:01:55.290
the news cycle. Is this just another awful incident

00:01:55.290 --> 00:01:57.319
or is it? part of something bigger in the US.

00:01:57.599 --> 00:02:00.079
It's a really important question. And when you

00:02:00.079 --> 00:02:03.540
look at the history, the pattern is frankly disturbing.

00:02:04.239 --> 00:02:07.640
Political violence is, in a grim way, as American

00:02:07.640 --> 00:02:11.719
as apple pie. Think about it just recently. Gabrielle

00:02:11.719 --> 00:02:14.860
Giffords in 2011, Steve Scalise shot in 2017,

00:02:15.120 --> 00:02:17.580
those two Minnesota state reps just this past

00:02:17.580 --> 00:02:20.460
June, and now Charlie Kirk. Right. And historically,

00:02:21.280 --> 00:02:24.379
four presidents assassinated. 11 members of Congress,

00:02:24.680 --> 00:02:26.659
four governors, dozens of state legislators,

00:02:26.960 --> 00:02:30.280
mayors. The list goes on. It's a long, sad history.

00:02:31.120 --> 00:02:32.599
But here's the thing that worries me and a lot

00:02:32.599 --> 00:02:35.799
of analysts. It's the normalization. Lincoln's

00:02:35.799 --> 00:02:38.259
assassination, right? Still taught 160 years

00:02:38.259 --> 00:02:41.080
later, these modern shootings. They might get

00:02:41.080 --> 00:02:43.340
a couple of news cycles, if that much, and are

00:02:43.340 --> 00:02:45.159
then gone with the wind. Yeah, you see the spike

00:02:45.159 --> 00:02:47.280
online. Exactly. Google searches surged that

00:02:47.280 --> 00:02:49.219
day, then boom, they plummet. Newspaper coverage

00:02:49.219 --> 00:02:51.020
does the same. It's like the collective reaction

00:02:51.020 --> 00:02:52.960
is, oh, another one. Awful. OK, what's next?

00:02:53.120 --> 00:02:56.560
That rapid desensitization, that's really worrying.

00:02:56.659 --> 00:02:58.759
It starts to feel like this is just normal life

00:02:58.759 --> 00:03:01.240
in America, which is terrible for our civic health.

00:03:01.340 --> 00:03:03.340
That's a really sobering thought, that desensitization,

00:03:03.479 --> 00:03:05.979
maybe for some it's not indifferent. maybe it's

00:03:05.979 --> 00:03:07.800
just exhaustion, like the problems feel too huge.

00:03:08.159 --> 00:03:10.219
On that note, Political Magazine actually gathered,

00:03:10.280 --> 00:03:13.780
what, 10 experts on political violence to ask,

00:03:13.879 --> 00:03:15.919
okay, where do we go from here? What do they

00:03:15.919 --> 00:03:18.719
say? Yeah, they brought together a range of voices

00:03:18.719 --> 00:03:21.099
and their insights really map out the current

00:03:21.099 --> 00:03:23.240
climate, including maybe some of that weariness

00:03:23.240 --> 00:03:25.460
you mentioned. We can kind of group their thoughts

00:03:25.460 --> 00:03:28.919
first on the problem and its roots. Barbara Walter,

00:03:28.919 --> 00:03:31.240
she points to four conditions where violence

00:03:31.240 --> 00:03:35.020
often spikes. Democracy weakening, society deeply

00:03:35.020 --> 00:03:38.020
split along lines like race or religion, leaders

00:03:38.020 --> 00:03:40.780
tolerating or even hinting at violence, and easy

00:03:40.780 --> 00:03:43.819
gun access. Her take. The U .S. checks all four

00:03:43.819 --> 00:03:47.490
boxes right now, which is... Then Sean Westwood

00:03:47.490 --> 00:03:49.669
points out how leaders can exploit the idea that

00:03:49.669 --> 00:03:52.210
the other side is a vast, murderous faction.

00:03:52.689 --> 00:03:54.650
It works for short -term gain, but it eats away

00:03:54.650 --> 00:03:57.250
at stability, even though, he notes, only like

00:03:57.250 --> 00:03:59.669
2 % of Americans actually approve of political

00:03:59.669 --> 00:04:02.509
assassinations. The perception is what gets exploited.

00:04:03.310 --> 00:04:05.449
And Erica France says, look, the crook killing

00:04:05.449 --> 00:04:08.310
isn't in a vacuum. Think January 6 rioters, other

00:04:08.310 --> 00:04:11.310
incidents. She sees a big problem in the personalization

00:04:11.310 --> 00:04:13.689
of politics leaders seen as just out for themselves,

00:04:13.750 --> 00:04:15.909
not representing the people. Okay, so that's

00:04:15.909 --> 00:04:18.069
the roots. What about the nature of the violence

00:04:18.069 --> 00:04:20.850
itself? Client of Raleigh offers a slightly different

00:04:20.850 --> 00:04:25.069
angle. She sees the U .S. trend more as lone

00:04:25.069 --> 00:04:27.810
-actor violence without a clear partisan trend.

00:04:28.189 --> 00:04:30.629
Think John Wilkes Booth or Lee Harvey Oswald.

00:04:31.129 --> 00:04:34.029
Her point is, this suggests maybe we're not on

00:04:34.029 --> 00:04:36.870
the verge of full -blown civil war, which is

00:04:36.870 --> 00:04:39.910
something, I guess. But it does mean we absolutely

00:04:39.910 --> 00:04:41.810
need to look at gun access and mental health

00:04:41.810 --> 00:04:44.589
support. And how do we break this cycle? What

00:04:44.589 --> 00:04:47.329
about leadership? That's the crucial part. Joel

00:04:47.329 --> 00:04:49.389
Buscher warns that just cracking down hard could

00:04:49.389 --> 00:04:52.089
actually backfire, lead to more violence. Leaders,

00:04:52.149 --> 00:04:54.850
he says, have to condemn all violence unequivocally,

00:04:55.029 --> 00:04:56.990
even if it seems to help their side politically.

00:04:57.509 --> 00:04:59.649
And they need to acknowledge people are genuinely

00:04:59.649 --> 00:05:02.290
unhappy with the system. Acknowledge the anger,

00:05:02.509 --> 00:05:05.569
but condemn the violence. Exactly. Saulvault

00:05:05.569 --> 00:05:07.529
-Hillerson agrees when people feel the system

00:05:07.529 --> 00:05:10.470
ignores them, violence can start to look justified

00:05:10.470 --> 00:05:13.389
to some. And look at the scale. Shannon Hiller's

00:05:13.389 --> 00:05:16.430
group tracked 250 threats against politicians

00:05:16.430 --> 00:05:20.370
just in the first half of 2025 across 40 states.

00:05:20.810 --> 00:05:23.250
Her point is We don't have to accept this. We

00:05:23.250 --> 00:05:25.389
need cross -party efforts to reject violence,

00:05:25.709 --> 00:05:29.069
stop the blame game. 250 threats. Yeah. Yeah.

00:05:29.170 --> 00:05:31.129
Dolly Berkovitz adds that glorifying attacks

00:05:31.129 --> 00:05:34.290
is super dangerous. Risks normalizing them could

00:05:34.290 --> 00:05:36.629
lead to tit -for -tat violence. She says leaders

00:05:36.629 --> 00:05:38.810
have to lower the temperature, stop attacking

00:05:38.810 --> 00:05:41.470
their favorite enemies. Makes sense. Robert Pape,

00:05:41.509 --> 00:05:43.970
who actually predicted back in June we were nearing

00:05:43.970 --> 00:05:47.250
major political violence, he sees this as a critical

00:05:47.250 --> 00:05:49.769
moment. He's calling for every leader, president

00:05:49.769 --> 00:05:52.769
on down, to put Strong video condemnations of

00:05:52.769 --> 00:05:55.009
political violence pushed them hard on social

00:05:55.009 --> 00:05:57.889
media, especially TikTok, aimed right at their

00:05:57.889 --> 00:06:00.430
own supporters. A really direct call to action

00:06:00.430 --> 00:06:03.769
for leaders. Absolutely. And finally, Eduardo

00:06:03.769 --> 00:06:06.389
Moncada echoes the concern about normalization

00:06:06.389 --> 00:06:09.370
people justifying violence if the system fails

00:06:09.370 --> 00:06:12.470
them. He says partisan narratives have to stop.

00:06:12.850 --> 00:06:14.829
Leaders need accountability for dehumanizing

00:06:14.829 --> 00:06:17.910
language. And we have to correct this false idea

00:06:17.910 --> 00:06:20.430
that the other side actually wants violence.

00:06:21.029 --> 00:06:23.649
Those are some really powerful and honestly pretty

00:06:23.649 --> 00:06:25.870
disturbing takeaways about the situation here.

00:06:26.250 --> 00:06:28.439
But Kirk's death. It didn't just stay within

00:06:28.439 --> 00:06:30.959
U .S. borders, did it? We saw international reactions,

00:06:31.199 --> 00:06:34.519
too. Condemnations from Italy's Maloney, France,

00:06:34.860 --> 00:06:37.300
the U .K.'s Starmer. Yes, there were those official

00:06:37.300 --> 00:06:39.639
condemnations calling it atrocious and so on.

00:06:39.920 --> 00:06:42.100
But what was really striking was how partisan

00:06:42.100 --> 00:06:45.139
other international reactions were. How so? Well,

00:06:45.259 --> 00:06:47.399
Hungary's Viktor Orban, for instance, immediately

00:06:47.399 --> 00:06:49.220
pointed the finger at the progressive liberal

00:06:49.220 --> 00:06:52.279
left. You saw vigils for Kirk popping up, organized

00:06:52.279 --> 00:06:54.600
by far -right groups in places like London, Berlin,

00:06:54.740 --> 00:06:56.560
Rome. Right, I heard about the London march.

00:06:56.800 --> 00:07:00.000
Yeah, that was huge. Over 100 ,000 people, led

00:07:00.000 --> 00:07:02.519
by Tommy Robinson, the far -right activist, it

00:07:02.519 --> 00:07:05.100
ended in clashes with police, arrests, officers

00:07:05.100 --> 00:07:07.500
injured, and across Europe, populist parties

00:07:07.500 --> 00:07:10.819
are seizing on Kirk's murder, pushing anti -immigrant,

00:07:11.100 --> 00:07:14.040
anti -globalist, anti -elite messages, sometimes

00:07:14.040 --> 00:07:17.199
using the slogan, mega, make Europe great again.

00:07:17.759 --> 00:07:20.569
Mega. Wow, so it's like a parallel movement.

00:07:20.870 --> 00:07:23.709
What's the historical context of this transatlantic

00:07:23.709 --> 00:07:26.029
linkup? It's a real paradox, actually. You have

00:07:26.029 --> 00:07:28.170
the American right and the European right aligning

00:07:28.170 --> 00:07:30.189
on goals in a way we haven't really seen since

00:07:30.189 --> 00:07:32.870
the Cold War ended when anti -communism was the

00:07:32.870 --> 00:07:34.970
glue. What's weird is that many of these groups

00:07:34.970 --> 00:07:38.430
now cooperating have traditionally viscerally

00:07:38.430 --> 00:07:41.230
hated transatlantic cooperation. It's a strange

00:07:41.230 --> 00:07:43.089
new dynamic. Fascinating. OK, let's bring it

00:07:43.089 --> 00:07:45.709
back home. How did Donald Trump himself react?

00:07:45.930 --> 00:07:48.050
especially considering those expert calls for

00:07:48.050 --> 00:07:50.170
de -escalation we just talked about. Well, reports

00:07:50.170 --> 00:07:53.589
say he was in shock, anger, and disbelief. Kirk

00:07:53.589 --> 00:07:56.430
was seen as a really key ally, a personal friend.

00:07:56.889 --> 00:07:59.069
Donald Trump Jr. even said Kirk was like another

00:07:59.069 --> 00:08:02.470
son to his father. Trump acted accordingly, sent

00:08:02.470 --> 00:08:05.329
JD Vance on Air Force Two for the casket, awarded

00:08:05.329 --> 00:08:07.829
Kirk the Presidential Medal of Freedom posthumously,

00:08:08.470 --> 00:08:11.660
planned to attend the funeral. So... a very personal,

00:08:11.699 --> 00:08:14.139
strong reaction. But what about his public statements

00:08:14.139 --> 00:08:16.100
in light of the calls for unity? That's where

00:08:16.100 --> 00:08:19.040
the contrast is really stark. On Fox, Ainsley

00:08:19.040 --> 00:08:21.160
Earhart asked him directly, how can the country

00:08:21.160 --> 00:08:23.160
come together now? And Trump's response was,

00:08:23.680 --> 00:08:25.180
well, he said, I'll tell you something that's

00:08:25.180 --> 00:08:26.639
going to get me in trouble, but I couldn't care

00:08:26.639 --> 00:08:29.379
less. The radicals on the right oftentimes are

00:08:29.379 --> 00:08:30.819
radical because they don't want to see crime.

00:08:30.959 --> 00:08:32.340
They're saying we don't want these people coming

00:08:32.340 --> 00:08:35.159
in. We don't want you burning our shopping. So.

00:08:35.389 --> 00:08:38.809
You notice, instead of a unifying message, it

00:08:38.809 --> 00:08:41.029
pivots back to grievances, kind of justifying

00:08:41.029 --> 00:08:43.970
the radical right's anger. It wasn't the de -escalation

00:08:43.970 --> 00:08:46.549
many experts were hoping for. Yeah, quite a departure

00:08:46.549 --> 00:08:49.730
from those calls for unity. Okay, the Kurt killing

00:08:49.730 --> 00:08:53.629
is obviously a huge tragic event, highlighting

00:08:53.629 --> 00:08:57.129
these deep tensions. But these political currents...

00:08:56.909 --> 00:08:59.210
They run deeper than just specific events, right?

00:08:59.210 --> 00:09:01.110
They're changing how leaders operate, how the

00:09:01.110 --> 00:09:03.769
system itself works. Let's shift gears a bit.

00:09:04.149 --> 00:09:06.830
What other big shifts are you seeing? Well, one

00:09:06.830 --> 00:09:08.909
really interesting shift, I think, comes from

00:09:08.909 --> 00:09:12.009
former President Obama. Remember his famous 2004

00:09:12.009 --> 00:09:15.330
speech? No red America, no blue America, only

00:09:15.330 --> 00:09:18.610
the United States of America. Yeah, iconic. Well,

00:09:18.750 --> 00:09:21.059
sources suggest he's basically decided. He was

00:09:21.059 --> 00:09:23.840
wrong. He's reportedly endorsed California Governor

00:09:23.840 --> 00:09:26.419
Gavin Newsom's strategy to make California even

00:09:26.419 --> 00:09:29.519
more blue. It's like an acceptance of the kind

00:09:29.519 --> 00:09:32.360
of unity he envisioned back then is, quote, passe,

00:09:32.820 --> 00:09:35.080
a pretty significant turnaround from his earlier

00:09:35.080 --> 00:09:37.480
idealism. That's striking. And how does that

00:09:37.480 --> 00:09:39.960
fit with, say, Donald Trump's approach in this

00:09:39.960 --> 00:09:42.259
divided landscape? It fits perfectly in a way,

00:09:42.580 --> 00:09:44.320
because sources make it clear Trump sees himself

00:09:44.320 --> 00:09:46.340
as the president of the red states of America.

00:09:46.779 --> 00:09:49.240
He apparently doesn't give a rat's about the

00:09:49.240 --> 00:09:51.940
blue states, views them almost as internal enemies.

00:09:52.240 --> 00:09:55.580
And it's not just him. Think back to Steve Bannon

00:09:55.580 --> 00:09:58.480
in 2016 saying, we didn't win an election to

00:09:58.480 --> 00:10:01.279
bring the country together. Or even Trump's OMB

00:10:01.279 --> 00:10:04.000
director, Russell Vaught, complaining appropriations

00:10:04.000 --> 00:10:07.990
are too bipartisan. It feels like a deliberate

00:10:07.990 --> 00:10:10.750
turning away from trying to bridge divides, almost

00:10:10.750 --> 00:10:13.879
institutionalizing the separation. And that separation,

00:10:14.120 --> 00:10:16.679
that drive for partisan advantage, seems really

00:10:16.679 --> 00:10:18.899
visible in the fights over gerrymandering, too.

00:10:19.299 --> 00:10:21.500
Missouri just passed a map targeting Emanuel

00:10:21.500 --> 00:10:24.580
Cleaver, a Democrat in a D -plus -12 seat. Yeah,

00:10:24.620 --> 00:10:26.559
they redrew it specifically to make it almost

00:10:26.559 --> 00:10:28.620
impossible for him to win, even though the district

00:10:28.620 --> 00:10:31.179
leans heavily Democratic. Voters might get a

00:10:31.179 --> 00:10:32.759
say because of an emergency clause, but it's

00:10:32.759 --> 00:10:35.200
a clear power play. And Ohio looks like it's

00:10:35.200 --> 00:10:37.000
next. They're expected to go after Democratic

00:10:37.000 --> 00:10:39.820
reps Marcy Capture and Amelia Sykes. So what's

00:10:39.820 --> 00:10:41.740
the bigger picture here with gerrymandering?

00:10:41.840 --> 00:10:44.220
The big implication is the House becoming more

00:10:44.220 --> 00:10:47.259
and more like the Electoral College, where whichever

00:10:47.259 --> 00:10:49.879
party controls the state legislature can basically

00:10:49.879 --> 00:10:52.539
draw lines to guarantee they get nearly all the

00:10:52.539 --> 00:10:55.019
House seats in that state, regardless of the

00:10:55.019 --> 00:10:58.039
statewide popular vote. It's like this huge bug

00:10:58.039 --> 00:11:00.639
in the Constitution that nobody, not even Madison,

00:11:00.940 --> 00:11:02.919
really foresaw. And the Supreme Court has mostly

00:11:02.919 --> 00:11:05.159
stayed out of it, which just lets the political

00:11:05.159 --> 00:11:09.259
maneuvering run wild. So faced with these deep

00:11:09.259 --> 00:11:13.159
divisions, the gerrymandering, What's the strategy

00:11:13.159 --> 00:11:15.000
for Democrats? How do they connect with voters

00:11:15.000 --> 00:11:17.379
who might feel the whole system is broken? Well,

00:11:17.559 --> 00:11:19.659
two Democratic strategists, Ashley Etienne and

00:11:19.659 --> 00:11:21.639
Jesse Lee, they've put out this memo arguing

00:11:21.639 --> 00:11:24.580
for a pretty direct approach. campaign hard on

00:11:24.580 --> 00:11:26.759
the culture of corruption and abuse of power.

00:11:27.000 --> 00:11:29.279
Their thinking is people already feel the system

00:11:29.279 --> 00:11:32.100
is rigged. So validate that feeling and then

00:11:32.100 --> 00:11:34.259
point fingers, arguing Trump is the one rigging

00:11:34.259 --> 00:11:37.659
it. They list specific examples they'd use, alleging

00:11:37.659 --> 00:11:40.159
the DOJ covered up Eckstein's crimes, firing

00:11:40.159 --> 00:11:42.720
officials who disagreed, rigging elections via

00:11:42.720 --> 00:11:45.559
gerrymandering, using crypto for donor access,

00:11:45.879 --> 00:11:48.259
weaponizing law enforcement. They argue this

00:11:48.259 --> 00:11:51.120
worked in 2018 when Democrats picked up 41 seats.

00:11:51.460 --> 00:11:53.289
Right. So it's not just complaining. proposing

00:11:53.289 --> 00:11:56.049
fixes to exactly it's not just diagnosis it's

00:11:56.049 --> 00:11:58.730
prescription they propose a whole package of

00:11:58.730 --> 00:12:02.029
reforms things like banning stock ownership for

00:12:02.029 --> 00:12:05.009
officials except broad ETFs, diversified funds,

00:12:05.529 --> 00:12:08.169
ending gerrymandering for good, real binding

00:12:08.169 --> 00:12:10.950
ethics rules for everyone with teeth, Senate

00:12:10.950 --> 00:12:13.350
approval needed for emergency declarations limited

00:12:13.350 --> 00:12:15.889
to 30 days, no more acting heads of departments

00:12:15.889 --> 00:12:18.570
for long periods, repealing presidential emergency

00:12:18.570 --> 00:12:21.850
powers, making it impeachable to mess with congressionally

00:12:21.850 --> 00:12:24.309
approved funding, court reforms, especially the

00:12:24.309 --> 00:12:26.990
Supreme Court, and big campaign finance changes,

00:12:27.190 --> 00:12:29.610
public matching funds, making superpig donors

00:12:29.610 --> 00:12:32.190
transparent. It's a pretty sweeping list aimed

00:12:32.200 --> 00:12:35.299
systemic change. Okay, shifting from political

00:12:35.299 --> 00:12:38.679
strategy to, well, kitchen table stuff. Health

00:12:38.679 --> 00:12:41.019
insurance. We're hearing premiums might be about

00:12:41.019 --> 00:12:43.340
to jump a lot. What's going on there? Yeah, this

00:12:43.340 --> 00:12:45.279
could be a big deal for a lot of people and it

00:12:45.279 --> 00:12:47.879
definitely has political angles. There are a

00:12:47.879 --> 00:12:52.299
few key drivers, the biggest one. Those enhanced

00:12:52.299 --> 00:12:54.419
subsidies for health insurance, the ones put

00:12:54.419 --> 00:12:57.659
in place back in 2021 during the pandemic. They're

00:12:57.659 --> 00:13:01.940
set to expire December 31st, 2025. If they expire,

00:13:02.299 --> 00:13:05.299
some people could see premium heights of 50 percent,

00:13:05.320 --> 00:13:07.940
which often means younger, healthier people drop

00:13:07.940 --> 00:13:10.960
coverage, making the insurance pool riskier and

00:13:10.960 --> 00:13:13.320
driving costs up even more for everyone else.

00:13:13.419 --> 00:13:16.039
It's a potential spiral. OK, that's huge. What

00:13:16.039 --> 00:13:18.500
else? Well, they're also the proposed Trump terrace

00:13:18.500 --> 00:13:21.000
on imported drugs, potentially up to 250 percent.

00:13:20.809 --> 00:13:22.929
Even if they're not enacted yet, insurers are

00:13:22.929 --> 00:13:25.090
likely already pricing in that risk because supply

00:13:25.090 --> 00:13:27.690
chains are global. And you've got the rising

00:13:27.690 --> 00:13:30.629
cost of new, expensive drugs like the GLP -1s

00:13:30.629 --> 00:13:32.929
for weight loss and diabetes. That's adding pressure,

00:13:33.129 --> 00:13:35.450
too. So politically? Politically, Democrats have

00:13:35.450 --> 00:13:38.470
a clear line of attack here. They can blame Republicans

00:13:38.470 --> 00:13:41.129
for letting the subsidies expire and for proposing

00:13:41.129 --> 00:13:44.210
the tariffs. It could be a really powerful Democratic

00:13:44.210 --> 00:13:47.389
weapon heading into future elections. OK, finally,

00:13:47.450 --> 00:13:49.590
let's just touch on the human side of all this

00:13:49.590 --> 00:13:52.490
pressure. We heard about Dr. Yadira Caraveo in

00:13:52.490 --> 00:13:55.490
Colorado ending her campaign. She was the first

00:13:55.490 --> 00:13:58.029
Latina to represent the state in Congress. Yeah,

00:13:58.029 --> 00:14:00.769
her story is really poignant. It highlights the

00:14:00.769 --> 00:14:02.850
intense pressure these politicians are under.

00:14:03.269 --> 00:14:06.370
Sources say she cited mental health issues, including

00:14:06.480 --> 00:14:09.799
very sadly, to suicide attempts. And she spoke

00:14:09.799 --> 00:14:12.379
about the stigma associated with mental health.

00:14:12.779 --> 00:14:15.240
It's just a stark reminder of the human cost

00:14:15.240 --> 00:14:17.519
behind the political battles. Absolutely. And

00:14:17.519 --> 00:14:19.159
on a related note, though, for different reasons,

00:14:19.259 --> 00:14:21.179
Representative Mike McCaul, a senior Republican

00:14:21.179 --> 00:14:24.159
from Texas, he's decided not to run again, looking

00:14:24.159 --> 00:14:26.120
for private sector work instead. It just shows

00:14:26.120 --> 00:14:28.299
how demanding these jobs are. We have covered

00:14:28.299 --> 00:14:30.480
a lot of ground today, a truly deep dive from

00:14:30.480 --> 00:14:33.120
the shocking killing of Charlie Kirk and what

00:14:33.120 --> 00:14:35.059
that reveals about political violence. And the

00:14:35.059 --> 00:14:37.629
normalization of it. Right, that normalization.

00:14:38.250 --> 00:14:40.769
To the shifts in political strategy, the mechanics

00:14:40.769 --> 00:14:43.090
of things like gerrymandering, and these real

00:14:43.090 --> 00:14:44.929
-world pressures like health insurance costs.

00:14:45.450 --> 00:14:47.490
Yeah, and if you try to connect all those dots

00:14:47.490 --> 00:14:50.879
the bigger picture, it's challenging. We're clearly

00:14:50.879 --> 00:14:53.279
in an environment where democratic norms feel

00:14:53.279 --> 00:14:56.200
strained, divisions are sharp, both here and

00:14:56.200 --> 00:14:58.580
globally. And that leaves a really important

00:14:58.580 --> 00:15:00.500
question for you, the listener, to think about.

00:15:00.899 --> 00:15:02.980
In this kind of world where division is often

00:15:02.980 --> 00:15:05.460
exploited, where violence risks becoming normalized,

00:15:05.940 --> 00:15:08.559
how do we as individuals keep thinking critically?

00:15:08.700 --> 00:15:11.039
How do we demand accountability from leaders?

00:15:11.220 --> 00:15:13.360
And how do we resist these forces trying to pull

00:15:13.360 --> 00:15:15.360
us apart? It's definitely something to mull over

00:15:15.360 --> 00:15:17.600
as we all try to navigate these really complex

00:15:17.600 --> 00:15:18.019
times.
