WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:03.600
OK, let's unpack this. Welcome to the deep dive.

00:00:03.819 --> 00:00:08.019
Hello. Today we're diving deep into, well, a

00:00:08.019 --> 00:00:10.259
really intense collection of sources. They give

00:00:10.259 --> 00:00:14.580
us a raw snapshot of some major political and

00:00:14.580 --> 00:00:16.879
legal conflicts happening right now. Yeah, quite

00:00:16.879 --> 00:00:19.820
a mix. And our mission for you, our listener,

00:00:20.480 --> 00:00:23.899
is to pull out the key insights, maybe some surprising

00:00:23.899 --> 00:00:25.940
facts, and just help you cut through all the

00:00:25.940 --> 00:00:28.219
noise to see what's really important. We've got

00:00:28.219 --> 00:00:32.020
everything from a really shocking event to critical

00:00:32.020 --> 00:00:35.950
legal rulings, high stakes politics. A lot to

00:00:35.950 --> 00:00:37.890
cover. And what's fascinating as we look through

00:00:37.890 --> 00:00:40.229
this stuff is how connected it all is, you know?

00:00:40.409 --> 00:00:42.810
These aren't isolated incidents. They reflect

00:00:42.810 --> 00:00:46.810
these broader, sometimes frankly troubling trends

00:00:46.810 --> 00:00:50.429
in American politics and the legal system. So

00:00:50.429 --> 00:00:52.310
we'll kick the dots for you. Exactly. Look at

00:00:52.310 --> 00:00:54.609
the implications. Consider the different viewpoints

00:00:54.609 --> 00:00:56.490
and the sources. It's a wide range political

00:00:56.490 --> 00:00:58.750
violence, election integrity challenges, executive

00:00:58.750 --> 00:01:01.429
power questions. Okay, prepare for some aha moments

00:01:01.429 --> 00:01:04.340
then. Let's start with something genuinely heartbreaking,

00:01:04.659 --> 00:01:07.159
really unsettling that happened yesterday. Conservative

00:01:07.159 --> 00:01:10.319
activist Charlie Kirk. Yeah. Founder of Turning

00:01:10.319 --> 00:01:13.280
Point USA, he was shot and killed at a rally.

00:01:13.379 --> 00:01:16.299
Yeah. Utah Valley University, north of Provo.

00:01:16.459 --> 00:01:19.650
Just 31 years old. leaves behind a wife, two

00:01:19.650 --> 00:01:22.629
young kids. He had a huge national profile, right?

00:01:23.109 --> 00:01:26.450
Campus debates, the talk show, big social media

00:01:26.450 --> 00:01:29.530
guy. And our sources really highlight his strong

00:01:29.530 --> 00:01:31.769
support for Donald Trump. He was running a major

00:01:31.769 --> 00:01:34.450
get out the vote operation for him for 2024.

00:01:34.870 --> 00:01:37.430
A key figure, no doubt. What do we know about

00:01:37.430 --> 00:01:40.150
the investigation? Well, the police think he

00:01:40.150 --> 00:01:42.430
was shot from inside the Luce Center, which is,

00:01:42.510 --> 00:01:44.609
what, about 500 feet away from where he was speaking.

00:01:44.670 --> 00:01:48.200
Wow. The suspect got away. So there's a manhunt

00:01:48.200 --> 00:01:50.359
going on. They did arrest someone initially,

00:01:50.540 --> 00:01:52.920
a person of interest. But the sources say pretty

00:01:52.920 --> 00:01:55.939
bluntly it was the wrong guy. So the search continues.

00:01:56.180 --> 00:01:58.719
And the political reactions, well, they immediately

00:01:58.719 --> 00:02:01.379
show just how divided things are starkly. It's

00:02:01.379 --> 00:02:03.459
like an instant Rorschach test, isn't it? Where

00:02:03.459 --> 00:02:05.920
do people stand? So you look at the Democratic

00:02:05.920 --> 00:02:08.979
leadership response. A lot of it pivoted quickly

00:02:08.979 --> 00:02:12.620
to gun control. Right. Angela Romero, Utah House

00:02:12.620 --> 00:02:14.879
Minority Leader, said gun violence is horrible

00:02:14.879 --> 00:02:17.620
and goes both ways, and she blamed Utah's lax

00:02:17.620 --> 00:02:20.400
gun laws. Pointed out, loaded guns are allowed

00:02:20.400 --> 00:02:22.840
on campus. While expressing horror, of course.

00:02:23.080 --> 00:02:26.360
Of course. And Gabrielle Giffords, herself a

00:02:26.360 --> 00:02:29.229
shooting survivor, She said she was horrified,

00:02:29.490 --> 00:02:31.409
stressed that political disagreements must never

00:02:31.409 --> 00:02:33.430
turn violent in America. And Governor Newsom

00:02:33.430 --> 00:02:36.289
in California. He was on X, formerly Twitter,

00:02:36.550 --> 00:02:40.469
saying the attack was disgusting, vile and reprehensible,

00:02:40.949 --> 00:02:43.270
called for rejecting political violence in every

00:02:43.270 --> 00:02:46.250
form. Our sources noted that maybe felt a little

00:02:46.250 --> 00:02:48.800
oversold. compared to Romero and Giffords. Yeah,

00:02:48.879 --> 00:02:50.840
that was the observation, a bit overselling it.

00:02:50.979 --> 00:02:52.639
But then you look at the Democratic rank and

00:02:52.639 --> 00:02:55.240
file, especially online. A very different reaction.

00:02:55.479 --> 00:02:57.699
Very different. Quite jarring, actually. A lot

00:02:57.699 --> 00:02:59.819
of people reposted that quote from Kirk back

00:02:59.819 --> 00:03:02.800
in 2023 after a school shooting. The one about

00:03:02.800 --> 00:03:04.750
the cause of the Second Amendment. That's the

00:03:04.750 --> 00:03:07.729
one. I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately,

00:03:07.889 --> 00:03:09.849
some gun deaths every single year so that we

00:03:09.849 --> 00:03:12.009
can have the Second Amendment. That is a prudent

00:03:12.009 --> 00:03:14.969
deal. And others pointed out his last reported

00:03:14.969 --> 00:03:18.389
words were attacking trans people and, implicitly,

00:03:18.810 --> 00:03:20.590
Mexican immigrants. What's the sentiment online

00:03:20.590 --> 00:03:23.750
was? Pretty harsh. A lot of, as ye sow, so shall

00:03:23.750 --> 00:03:26.330
ye reap. Some people explicitly saying they were

00:03:26.330 --> 00:03:28.409
glad he was dead, that he got what he deserved.

00:03:28.909 --> 00:03:31.900
So one side calling for less violence. Focus

00:03:31.900 --> 00:03:34.740
on guns. But then we look at the Republican side.

00:03:35.479 --> 00:03:38.120
And it's a whole other picture, right? Very contrasting

00:03:38.120 --> 00:03:40.500
reactions there, too. Oh, definitely. Republican

00:03:40.500 --> 00:03:43.159
leadership, the focus was generally that this

00:03:43.159 --> 00:03:45.719
kind of violence has to stop. Donald Trump put

00:03:45.719 --> 00:03:49.460
out a video message. From the White House. Blaming

00:03:49.460 --> 00:03:52.039
radical left rhetoric, comparing conservatives

00:03:52.039 --> 00:03:54.979
to Nazis, saying that's directly responsible

00:03:54.979 --> 00:03:56.879
for the terrorism we're seeing. But the source

00:03:56.879 --> 00:03:58.620
material points out a contradiction there. A

00:03:58.620 --> 00:04:02.199
big one. Just hours before Kirk died, Trump himself

00:04:02.199 --> 00:04:04.639
posted on social media calling for the death

00:04:04.639 --> 00:04:07.300
penalty for an animal killer. So the source asks.

00:04:07.719 --> 00:04:10.379
Yeah, either Trump doesn't see how his own rhetoric

00:04:10.379 --> 00:04:12.520
is part of the problem, or he just doesn't care.

00:04:12.939 --> 00:04:15.300
That's the take. Speaker Mike Johnson also called

00:04:15.300 --> 00:04:18.279
for it to stop. He did, but notably didn't mention

00:04:18.279 --> 00:04:21.199
how Congress might act. Governor Spencer Cox

00:04:21.199 --> 00:04:24.339
in Utah, he started with heartfelt words about

00:04:24.339 --> 00:04:27.240
national soul -searching, asking, is this it?

00:04:27.399 --> 00:04:30.680
But then... Then, as the source puts it, he saber

00:04:30.680 --> 00:04:33.480
rattled, reminding everyone Utah has the death

00:04:33.480 --> 00:04:36.379
penalty and plans to use it on the shooter, which,

00:04:36.379 --> 00:04:38.959
you know, kind of undercut the introspection

00:04:38.959 --> 00:04:42.240
message. And the Republican base reaction online.

00:04:42.410 --> 00:04:44.790
Described as soul -crushing, just immediate blame

00:04:44.790 --> 00:04:48.170
heaped on liberals, libtards, Democrats, Democrat

00:04:48.170 --> 00:04:51.389
fascists. Wow. Lots of calls for the Maggie Rankin

00:04:51.389 --> 00:04:53.730
file to get ready for the war that is coming.

00:04:53.850 --> 00:04:56.670
The war. Yeah. And a really deep sense of loss.

00:04:56.970 --> 00:04:59.250
Fox News apparently prioritized Kirk's death

00:04:59.250 --> 00:05:01.649
over a school shooting in Colorado. Even in Congress

00:05:01.649 --> 00:05:04.870
itself. Things got heated. Oh, yeah. A moment

00:05:04.870 --> 00:05:06.810
of silence in the House was broken by Lauren

00:05:06.810 --> 00:05:10.180
Boebert demanding an out loud prayer. Then Annapalina

00:05:10.180 --> 00:05:13.079
Luna shouted Democrats were responsible, led

00:05:13.079 --> 00:05:16.360
to, quote, sniping from both sides for several

00:05:16.360 --> 00:05:19.480
minutes. So the leaders call for calm, but the

00:05:19.480 --> 00:05:22.439
rhetoric? The rhetoric from some seems to fuel

00:05:22.439 --> 00:05:24.519
the fire, according to these sources. It's a

00:05:24.519 --> 00:05:26.800
real contradiction. And you have to wonder if

00:05:26.800 --> 00:05:29.579
that contradiction is even acknowledged within

00:05:29.579 --> 00:05:33.250
their own circles or just ignored. The sources

00:05:33.250 --> 00:05:36.550
suggest it's largely overlooked or maybe strategically

00:05:36.550 --> 00:05:39.329
ignored. You know, the immediate impulses blame

00:05:39.329 --> 00:05:41.649
and rally the base, not really self -reflection

00:05:41.649 --> 00:05:44.230
on the rhetoric. It creates this dangerous feedback

00:05:44.230 --> 00:05:46.689
loop. Exactly. Even a tragedy like this gets

00:05:46.689 --> 00:05:48.709
instantly filtered through those partisan lenses.

00:05:49.029 --> 00:05:51.089
It cements the division, doesn't challenge it.

00:05:51.269 --> 00:05:52.870
So the bottom line from the sources is pretty

00:05:52.870 --> 00:05:55.750
bleak. It is. Despite all the emotion, the outcry,

00:05:55.810 --> 00:05:57.509
they basically say nothing is going to change.

00:05:57.709 --> 00:06:01.529
No new gun loss. Nope. And the rhetoric, probably

00:06:01.529 --> 00:06:04.600
not getting better. Might even get worse. Grim.

00:06:05.180 --> 00:06:09.319
OK, let's pivot from that immediate raw fallout.

00:06:09.839 --> 00:06:11.899
We need to talk about the Jeffrey Epstein scandal,

00:06:12.339 --> 00:06:15.720
which just keeps developing. Right. The shadow

00:06:15.720 --> 00:06:18.019
lingers. Donald Trump called the birthday letter

00:06:18.019 --> 00:06:20.879
a dead issue, wants everyone to move on. But

00:06:20.879 --> 00:06:24.819
more details are leaking about this. World's

00:06:24.819 --> 00:06:28.089
most famous birthday book. as our sources call

00:06:28.089 --> 00:06:30.449
it. Yeah, and it's not like a photo album, it's

00:06:30.449 --> 00:06:34.329
this leather -bound thing, three volumes, 238

00:06:34.329 --> 00:06:36.529
pages. Sections for different people. Friends,

00:06:36.709 --> 00:06:38.730
girlfriends, business. Ghislaine Maxwell apparently

00:06:38.730 --> 00:06:41.170
put it together. And the contents? Disturbing,

00:06:41.189 --> 00:06:43.430
that's the word the sources use. Loaded with

00:06:43.430 --> 00:06:46.709
sexually explicit language and images. Some showing

00:06:46.709 --> 00:06:49.610
almost naked young girls, others hinting at violence.

00:06:49.970 --> 00:06:52.029
Even though Maxwell claimed the intent was just

00:06:52.029 --> 00:06:54.029
nostalgic. Right, her introduction said it was

00:06:54.029 --> 00:06:56.269
just to gather stories and old photographs to

00:06:56.269 --> 00:06:58.790
j - But then you read the quotes, like, we picked

00:06:58.790 --> 00:07:01.170
up girls on the beach. I tell them with knife

00:07:01.170 --> 00:07:04.110
in my hand to take suits off. Another one. You

00:07:04.110 --> 00:07:06.350
began to realize that you could get away with

00:07:06.350 --> 00:07:09.230
shush. That chicks and people in general were

00:07:09.230 --> 00:07:13.509
schmucks. There's even a poem. A poem. Blonde,

00:07:13.550 --> 00:07:16.470
red, or brunette spread out geographically with

00:07:16.470 --> 00:07:19.550
this net of fish. Jeff's now the old man in the

00:07:19.550 --> 00:07:22.629
sea. That's... Bizarrely specific. And creepy.

00:07:23.189 --> 00:07:26.329
There's one letter with a picture from 83, a

00:07:26.329 --> 00:07:29.069
guy giving balloons to little girls, then another

00:07:29.069 --> 00:07:31.110
picture of him getting massages from topless

00:07:31.110 --> 00:07:34.610
women. So how does Trump fit into this, specifically

00:07:34.610 --> 00:07:37.009
the letter with his signature? What's his response

00:07:37.009 --> 00:07:39.610
been? He's flatly denied the letters from him,

00:07:40.209 --> 00:07:42.449
sued the Wall Street Journal for defamation over

00:07:42.449 --> 00:07:44.529
it. But the signature? Our sources note that

00:07:44.529 --> 00:07:47.149
if it isn't his, whoever forged it did an excellent

00:07:47.149 --> 00:07:49.660
job. Trump also claimed he doesn't draw pictures,

00:07:49.920 --> 00:07:52.240
but sources say he often does drawings for charity

00:07:52.240 --> 00:07:54.939
auctions. And a handwriting expert weighed in?

00:07:55.100 --> 00:07:57.740
Yes, Thomas Vastrik, president of SQDE, that's

00:07:57.740 --> 00:08:01.040
a questioned document examiner society. He said

00:08:01.040 --> 00:08:03.560
the signature is very consistent in letter design,

00:08:03.779 --> 00:08:06.060
slant and letter height ratios, he added. For

00:08:06.060 --> 00:08:08.160
someone to say it's not his handwriting, I don't

00:08:08.160 --> 00:08:10.100
know where they're coming from. Pretty definitive

00:08:10.100 --> 00:08:12.180
take from an expert. He's like it. And how are

00:08:12.180 --> 00:08:14.480
Republicans in Congress handling this? Mostly

00:08:14.480 --> 00:08:17.449
dodging. The common line is haven't seen it,

00:08:17.449 --> 00:08:19.610
even though it's been widely published. Any exception.

00:08:19.910 --> 00:08:22.389
Well, Tim Birchett claimed it was an auto pin

00:08:22.389 --> 00:08:24.970
forgery. There are other mentions of Trump, too,

00:08:24.970 --> 00:08:27.930
like an image of Epstein holding a joke check

00:08:27.930 --> 00:08:30.790
signed D .J. Trump for a fully depreciated woman.

00:08:31.069 --> 00:08:33.830
But that signature isn't his. The source clarifies

00:08:33.830 --> 00:08:38.409
that specific signature isn't Trump's. No. So

00:08:38.409 --> 00:08:40.850
beyond the book itself, what's happening legally

00:08:40.850 --> 00:08:43.669
or legislatively, is there a movement towards

00:08:43.669 --> 00:08:46.149
transparency? Yeah, there's definitely a push.

00:08:46.330 --> 00:08:48.610
Thomas Massey in the House is close to getting

00:08:48.610 --> 00:08:51.149
enough signatures on a discharge petition. Remind

00:08:51.149 --> 00:08:53.690
us what that does. It basically forces a bill

00:08:53.690 --> 00:08:56.610
out of committee for a full House vote. In this

00:08:56.610 --> 00:08:59.169
case, a bill to release all the DJ's Epstein

00:08:59.169 --> 00:09:01.990
files. Will it pass the Senate? Probably not.

00:09:02.169 --> 00:09:04.570
Even with Paul Hawley and all the Democrats saying

00:09:04.570 --> 00:09:08.029
yes. But the vote itself will be, quote, embarrassing

00:09:08.029 --> 00:09:11.590
for some who vote no. And other efforts. Epstein's

00:09:11.590 --> 00:09:14.389
victims are making their own client list. Senator

00:09:14.389 --> 00:09:17.889
Ron Wyden is pushing to investigate large, mysterious

00:09:17.889 --> 00:09:20.870
money transfers into Epstein's accounts, says

00:09:20.870 --> 00:09:23.649
Treasury Secretary Scott Besant is blocking him.

00:09:23.970 --> 00:09:26.669
Besant again? Yep. And Senator Chuck Schumer

00:09:26.669 --> 00:09:28.950
tried to attach an amendment to the defense bill,

00:09:29.129 --> 00:09:32.909
must release all Epstein files in 30 days. Republicans

00:09:32.909 --> 00:09:35.860
voted to table it, so... The fight for answers

00:09:35.860 --> 00:09:39.220
continues. A relentless push. OK, let's pivot

00:09:39.220 --> 00:09:42.139
again. We're looking now at a whole series of

00:09:42.139 --> 00:09:44.580
legal and political fights testing the boundaries

00:09:44.580 --> 00:09:48.100
of power, the rule of law across different parts

00:09:48.100 --> 00:09:50.200
of government. Yeah, really testing the guardrails.

00:09:50.399 --> 00:09:53.320
First up, a judge blocked an attempt to fire

00:09:53.320 --> 00:09:55.690
a Fed governor, Lisa Cook. Right. This is a big

00:09:55.690 --> 00:09:57.450
deal for the independence of the Federal Reserve.

00:09:57.830 --> 00:09:59.990
Trump tried to fire her based on allegations

00:09:59.990 --> 00:10:02.190
about mortgage applications she made before joining

00:10:02.190 --> 00:10:04.730
the Fed board. Claiming two primary residences?

00:10:04.870 --> 00:10:07.070
Something like that. But the law is clear. Fed

00:10:07.070 --> 00:10:09.830
governors can only be removed for cause, meaning

00:10:09.830 --> 00:10:12.470
serious misconduct while in office. And the judge.

00:10:12.850 --> 00:10:16.470
Judge Giacob, a Biden appointee, ruled Trump's

00:10:16.470 --> 00:10:18.669
reason wasn't legally valid because it was about

00:10:18.669 --> 00:10:21.830
pre -service stuff. She ordered Cook reinstated

00:10:21.830 --> 00:10:25.360
pending appeals. So the reasoning was? Cobb specifically

00:10:25.360 --> 00:10:28.120
noted Trump didn't claim any misconduct during

00:10:28.120 --> 00:10:32.080
her term or incompetence. The law stops a president

00:10:32.080 --> 00:10:34.919
from just firing a Fed governor to put their

00:10:34.919 --> 00:10:37.779
own pick in. And the implication if this ruling

00:10:37.779 --> 00:10:40.820
gets overturned? Huge. It could mean any federal

00:10:40.820 --> 00:10:43.500
board member, any agency head could be fired

00:10:43.500 --> 00:10:47.080
over any unproven past allegation. That would

00:10:47.080 --> 00:10:49.559
basically gut the independence of agencies like

00:10:49.559 --> 00:10:52.100
the Fed, which need to be separate from politics

00:10:52.100 --> 00:10:54.639
to manage the economy. That's a fundamental change.

00:10:55.039 --> 00:10:57.220
Absolutely. And the administration has already

00:10:57.220 --> 00:10:59.740
appealed. So this isn't settled. OK. Another

00:10:59.740 --> 00:11:02.200
perennial flashpoint. A potential government

00:11:02.200 --> 00:11:04.940
shutdown. Funding runs out September 30th. Yep.

00:11:05.120 --> 00:11:07.419
Here we go again. Needs seven Democratic votes

00:11:07.419 --> 00:11:09.320
in the Senate because of the filibuster. And

00:11:09.320 --> 00:11:11.220
the strategy from Democratic leadership seems

00:11:11.220 --> 00:11:13.139
to be. Our sources say they look like they're

00:11:13.139 --> 00:11:16.429
pre -caving. Basically agreeing to Republican

00:11:16.429 --> 00:11:18.330
funding levels in exchange for a nine -month

00:11:18.330 --> 00:11:20.590
extension of health insurance subsidies. How's

00:11:20.590 --> 00:11:22.909
that going down within the party? Not well with

00:11:22.909 --> 00:11:25.830
many rank -and -file House Democrats. They feel

00:11:25.830 --> 00:11:28.330
voters won't reward just maintaining the status

00:11:28.330 --> 00:11:31.309
quo. They're angry, their constituents want them

00:11:31.309 --> 00:11:34.009
to stand up and fight the Republicans, and that's

00:11:34.009 --> 00:11:36.690
being ignored. They feel like nobody will even

00:11:36.690 --> 00:11:39.289
notice this small win. And the Freedom Caucus.

00:11:39.350 --> 00:11:41.909
They hate the subsidy extension, want to abolish

00:11:41.909 --> 00:11:44.879
them entirely. So the likely outcome? Probably

00:11:44.879 --> 00:11:47.320
what usually happens, kicking the can down the

00:11:47.320 --> 00:11:50.220
road. A continuing resolution, temporary funding,

00:11:50.419 --> 00:11:52.539
solves nothing long term, sets up the same fight

00:11:52.539 --> 00:11:55.259
later. The cycle continues. Alright, let's talk

00:11:55.259 --> 00:11:58.100
elections and maps. Lots of legal fights over

00:11:58.100 --> 00:12:00.899
redistricting. So many. And the theme our sources

00:12:00.899 --> 00:12:03.940
point out is often Republican legislatures trying

00:12:03.940 --> 00:12:06.519
to disenfranchise people they don't like. And

00:12:06.519 --> 00:12:08.059
yeah, these are likely headed to the Supreme

00:12:08.059 --> 00:12:11.299
Court. Give us some examples. Okay, Texas. Lawsuits

00:12:11.299 --> 00:12:14.700
over redrawing House districts mid -cycle. LUAC

00:12:14.700 --> 00:12:17.860
says the new maps wreck Latino districts. them

00:12:17.860 --> 00:12:20.399
electing who they want. If SCOTUS takes this,

00:12:20.720 --> 00:12:22.620
sources worry it could destroy the rest of the

00:12:22.620 --> 00:12:25.259
VRA. The Voting Rights Act. The Voting Rights

00:12:25.259 --> 00:12:29.360
Act. Louisiana. Black leaders say with one third

00:12:29.360 --> 00:12:31.460
of the state black, they deserve two majority

00:12:31.460 --> 00:12:34.379
black house seats, not just one out of six. SCOTUS

00:12:34.379 --> 00:12:36.720
actually ordered a new map with two, but then

00:12:36.720 --> 00:12:39.289
white voters sued. New hearing is set. And then

00:12:39.289 --> 00:12:41.350
elsewhere. North Dakota and Mississippi. Similar

00:12:41.350 --> 00:12:46.190
cases. Native Americans in ND, NAACP and MS suing

00:12:46.190 --> 00:12:49.490
over discriminatory state maps. A lower court

00:12:49.490 --> 00:12:52.090
ordered a new map in ND, but then an appeals

00:12:52.090 --> 00:12:54.889
court said something huge. That private citizens

00:12:54.889 --> 00:12:57.649
can't sue to enforce the VRA, only the Department

00:12:57.649 --> 00:12:59.570
of Justice can. Wow, that's major. It really

00:12:59.570 --> 00:13:01.789
is. It could determine who can enforce the VRA.

00:13:02.190 --> 00:13:04.250
If the DOJ isn't interested, groups might have

00:13:04.250 --> 00:13:06.549
no way to challenge discriminatory maps. And

00:13:06.549 --> 00:13:08.850
you don't. Voters there passed an initiative

00:13:08.850 --> 00:13:11.230
back in 2018 for an independent commission to

00:13:11.230 --> 00:13:13.809
draw maps. The legislature just repealed it.

00:13:13.950 --> 00:13:15.899
Courts said they couldn't do that. Now it's before

00:13:15.899 --> 00:13:18.200
the Utah Supreme Court. It's all about who draws

00:13:18.200 --> 00:13:20.200
the lines, who gets represented. The fight over

00:13:20.200 --> 00:13:23.059
who gets to vote and if it counts fairly is clearly

00:13:23.059 --> 00:13:25.600
central. OK, moving from mass to voter rolls.

00:13:26.059 --> 00:13:27.559
Concerns about the federal government checking

00:13:27.559 --> 00:13:30.669
list for non -citizens. Yes. The administration's

00:13:30.669 --> 00:13:33.269
been pushing states for their voter rolls. Now

00:13:33.269 --> 00:13:36.149
it seems they're using the software called SAVE,

00:13:36.669 --> 00:13:39.169
called Magic Software by some sources. And it

00:13:39.169 --> 00:13:42.009
claims to do what? Claims it can spot non -citizens

00:13:42.009 --> 00:13:45.330
using just name, last four SSN digits, and date

00:13:45.330 --> 00:13:48.490
of birth. Maybe partisan registration, too. That's

00:13:48.490 --> 00:13:50.649
unclear. But the government isn't explaining

00:13:50.649 --> 00:13:54.009
how. No explanation of where the software or

00:13:54.009 --> 00:13:57.210
its database came from. No outside experts allowed

00:13:57.210 --> 00:14:00.590
to check or test it. Very opaque. And the problems

00:14:00.590 --> 00:14:03.580
with this approach? Huge potential flaws. First,

00:14:03.820 --> 00:14:05.539
you don't need to be a citizen to get a social

00:14:05.539 --> 00:14:07.559
security number. Lots of legal residents have

00:14:07.559 --> 00:14:10.440
them. So massive errors are likely, especially

00:14:10.440 --> 00:14:14.120
with common names. Think John Smith 1234. The

00:14:14.120 --> 00:14:16.139
system might find a deceased John Smith with

00:14:16.139 --> 00:14:18.259
those last four digits, but that doesn't mean

00:14:18.259 --> 00:14:20.360
the living voter John Smith with the same details

00:14:20.360 --> 00:14:22.480
should be purged. There can be multiple people.

00:14:22.580 --> 00:14:25.340
A statistical certainty, really. Exactly. And

00:14:25.340 --> 00:14:28.379
there's a real potential for racial bias. Black

00:14:28.379 --> 00:14:31.419
populations tend to have a smaller pool of common

00:14:31.419 --> 00:14:34.929
last names compared to white populations. Statistically,

00:14:35.389 --> 00:14:37.490
this increases their chances of being wrongly

00:14:37.490 --> 00:14:39.470
matched with someone deceased who shares the

00:14:39.470 --> 00:14:41.990
same common identifiers. Leading to disproportionate

00:14:41.990 --> 00:14:44.490
purges. That's the concern. Compared to white

00:14:44.490 --> 00:14:47.590
voters with a wider range of names where accidental

00:14:47.590 --> 00:14:50.710
matches are less likely, it's a flawed system

00:14:50.710 --> 00:14:53.389
with potentially discriminatory outcomes. Deeply

00:14:53.389 --> 00:14:56.450
worrying. OK, shifting from election mechanics

00:14:56.450 --> 00:14:59.230
to internal power plays, Republicans apparently

00:14:59.230 --> 00:15:02.090
whining about a guy named Bill Pult. Bill Pult.

00:15:03.009 --> 00:15:06.529
Wealthy, Trumpy, real estate guy. He's also a

00:15:06.529 --> 00:15:08.570
minor federal regulator director of the Federal

00:15:08.570 --> 00:15:10.750
Housing Finance Agency. Which gives him access

00:15:10.750 --> 00:15:13.370
to most US mortgages. And he's apparently been

00:15:13.370 --> 00:15:15.629
feeding Trump names of people who claimed two

00:15:15.629 --> 00:15:18.029
primary residences on mortgage applications.

00:15:18.629 --> 00:15:20.870
Which, again, isn't automatically illegal unless

00:15:20.870 --> 00:15:23.029
there's intent to defraud. But he's also active

00:15:23.029 --> 00:15:25.929
online. Became a vicious attack dog on social

00:15:25.929 --> 00:15:27.850
media is how the sources put it. And this led

00:15:27.850 --> 00:15:30.769
to some drama. Oh yeah, a public confrontation.

00:15:31.379 --> 00:15:34.580
At a fancy private dinner, Treasury Secretary

00:15:34.580 --> 00:15:37.259
Scott Besson apparently went up to Pulte and

00:15:37.259 --> 00:15:39.539
threatened him. Threatened him how? Said something

00:15:39.539 --> 00:15:41.679
like, why the funk are you talking to the president

00:15:41.679 --> 00:15:43.980
about me? Fluck you. I'm going to punch you in

00:15:43.980 --> 00:15:46.840
your fucking face. Then offered to fucking beat

00:15:46.840 --> 00:15:49.820
your ass outside. Whoa. Were there witnesses?

00:15:50.059 --> 00:15:53.200
Five eyewitnesses reported it. Quite the scene

00:15:53.200 --> 00:15:55.779
at the dinner party. How did Republicans react

00:15:55.779 --> 00:15:58.960
to that? Divided. Some in Congress, like Andy

00:15:58.960 --> 00:16:01.840
Barr and French Hill, sided with Besant. Thought

00:16:01.840 --> 00:16:04.399
Pulte was getting a little too big for his britches.

00:16:04.700 --> 00:16:06.539
Some apparently even said they'd have done the

00:16:06.539 --> 00:16:09.700
same thing. But others supported Pulte. Yeah.

00:16:09.940 --> 00:16:12.200
Freedom Caucus members like Andy Ogles and Byron

00:16:12.200 --> 00:16:14.600
Donalds, they say Pulte's doing a great job exposing

00:16:14.600 --> 00:16:17.539
mortgage stuff. Besant, by the way, is seen by

00:16:17.539 --> 00:16:19.860
some as the adult in the room. He's the one who

00:16:19.860 --> 00:16:21.840
challenged Elon Musk before. So even internal

00:16:21.840 --> 00:16:25.120
GOP fights get pretty direct. Apparently so.

00:16:25.279 --> 00:16:27.720
OK, finally, let's look at a really surprising

00:16:27.720 --> 00:16:30.779
legal outcome out of Michigan. The fake electors

00:16:30.779 --> 00:16:33.600
case. Yeah, this one is pretty stunning. Quick

00:16:33.600 --> 00:16:36.820
background. After the 2020 election, people in

00:16:36.820 --> 00:16:39.639
Michigan signed fake certificates saying Trump

00:16:39.639 --> 00:16:42.059
won the state, even though Biden won. Right.

00:16:42.080 --> 00:16:43.799
Biden won by about one hundred and fifty five

00:16:43.799 --> 00:16:47.139
thousand votes. Not close. State AG Dana Nestle

00:16:47.139 --> 00:16:50.740
charged them forgery, conspiracy, faced serious

00:16:50.740 --> 00:16:53.500
time by 14 years. Big charges. But the outcome.

00:16:53.799 --> 00:16:56.639
On Tuesday, Judge Kristen Simmons, appointed

00:16:56.639 --> 00:17:00.000
by Dem Governor Gretchen Whitmer in 2019, just

00:17:00.000 --> 00:17:01.740
threw the whole case out. Meaning they won't

00:17:01.740 --> 00:17:03.759
even stand trial. Exactly. And the reasoning

00:17:03.759 --> 00:17:06.700
is kind of wild. It really is. According to our

00:17:06.700 --> 00:17:09.400
sources, Judge Simmons said the fake electors

00:17:09.400 --> 00:17:11.720
genuinely believed Trump had won the state so

00:17:11.720 --> 00:17:14.390
they had every right to do it. Wait. Jen, your

00:17:14.390 --> 00:17:16.690
belief makes forgery okay. That seems to be the

00:17:16.690 --> 00:17:19.690
implication. The judge literally said their statements

00:17:19.690 --> 00:17:21.509
make it very clear that they believe that they

00:17:21.509 --> 00:17:23.529
could seek redress from their state senators.

00:17:24.430 --> 00:17:27.190
So forging documents is a new way to ask state

00:17:27.190 --> 00:17:29.890
senators for help. That's the source's sarcastic

00:17:29.890 --> 00:17:31.809
take. That sounds like a completely new legal

00:17:31.809 --> 00:17:35.069
standard. Our sources say it breaks new ground,

00:17:35.890 --> 00:17:39.250
allowing law breaking based on sincere belief.

00:17:39.789 --> 00:17:42.509
They draw parallels to things like honor killings

00:17:42.509 --> 00:17:45.710
or tax evasion based on belief. It's a dangerous

00:17:45.710 --> 00:17:48.150
precedent. And the implications go beyond Michigan.

00:17:48.309 --> 00:17:50.589
For sure. There are similar cases against fake

00:17:50.589 --> 00:17:53.589
electors in Arizona, Nevada, Wisconsin, Georgia.

00:17:54.329 --> 00:17:57.029
This Michigan ruling isn't binding, but judges

00:17:57.029 --> 00:17:59.950
elsewhere could look to Simmons' ruling for guidance.

00:18:00.150 --> 00:18:02.529
So the fear is? The source puts it starkly. The

00:18:02.529 --> 00:18:04.930
legal system simply doesn't work anymore if you

00:18:04.930 --> 00:18:07.329
can just delay cases until you find a sympathetic

00:18:07.329 --> 00:18:09.750
judge who accepts sincere belief as a defense

00:18:09.750 --> 00:18:12.990
for breaking the law. Wow, okay. We have covered

00:18:12.990 --> 00:18:15.410
a lot of ground today. We really have. So what

00:18:15.410 --> 00:18:17.730
does this all mean for you listening? We tried

00:18:17.730 --> 00:18:19.809
to cut through the noise, pull out the crucial

00:18:19.809 --> 00:18:22.609
stuff, maybe the surprising bits from these really

00:18:22.609 --> 00:18:25.130
intense stories. Yeah. From the awful event in

00:18:25.130 --> 00:18:28.250
Utah, the Epstein stuff, these big fights over

00:18:28.250 --> 00:18:31.829
federal power, election integrity. It shows how

00:18:31.829 --> 00:18:33.930
interconnected it all is, right? How it's shaping

00:18:33.930 --> 00:18:36.069
our society. Definitely makes you think about

00:18:36.069 --> 00:18:40.170
the impact of rhetoric, legal precedence on our

00:18:40.170 --> 00:18:42.910
shared reality. It really does. And maybe it

00:18:42.910 --> 00:18:44.650
raises the final question for you to think about.

00:18:45.049 --> 00:18:48.400
After hearing all this the heated rhetoric, the

00:18:48.400 --> 00:18:50.519
election challenges, the dangers our sources

00:18:50.519 --> 00:18:54.119
point to about future conflict. What does it

00:18:54.119 --> 00:18:56.460
say about the state of our democracy, the norms

00:18:56.460 --> 00:18:59.220
we thought we all shared? Our sources offer this

00:18:59.220 --> 00:19:01.660
really stark observation, a chilling thought

00:19:01.660 --> 00:19:04.640
about social cohesion. If and when the assassin

00:19:04.640 --> 00:19:06.940
is found, let us hope that he is a straight,

00:19:07.220 --> 00:19:10.029
white, Christian man. If the assassin turns out

00:19:10.029 --> 00:19:13.109
to be gay or trans or black or a democratic socialist

00:19:13.109 --> 00:19:15.529
or just a Democrat or an immigrant or Mexican,

00:19:15.910 --> 00:19:18.369
then God help us all. God help us all. Yeah.

00:19:18.509 --> 00:19:21.569
That perspective gives you a lot to consider

00:19:21.569 --> 00:19:24.630
about how fragile things might be, the path we're

00:19:24.630 --> 00:19:26.890
on. It certainly does. A truly thought -provoking

00:19:26.890 --> 00:19:29.049
place to end our deep dive. Thank you for joining

00:19:29.049 --> 00:19:31.029
us today as we navigated all this. We hope we

00:19:31.029 --> 00:19:33.069
gave you some clarity and plenty to reflect on.

00:19:33.269 --> 00:19:34.769
Thanks for listening. We'll see you next time.
