WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:03.640
Welcome to the Deep Dive. We take stacks of information,

00:00:04.040 --> 00:00:06.980
cut through the noise, and we'll get you straight

00:00:06.980 --> 00:00:09.359
to the insights that matter. And today, we've

00:00:09.359 --> 00:00:11.400
got a really fascinating collection of reports.

00:00:11.880 --> 00:00:14.519
They pull back the curtain on the intersection

00:00:14.519 --> 00:00:17.420
of politics, power, and information here in the

00:00:17.420 --> 00:00:20.100
US. Yeah, quite a mix. Our mission today is to

00:00:20.100 --> 00:00:23.179
unpack some complex, intertwined stories. Exactly.

00:00:23.600 --> 00:00:26.579
We're looking at the Epstein case. It's surprisingly

00:00:26.579 --> 00:00:28.780
linked to QAnon. Still going strong, apparently.

00:00:28.940 --> 00:00:30.679
Right. And then there are the internal battles

00:00:30.679 --> 00:00:33.899
within both parties, challenges to economic data

00:00:33.899 --> 00:00:36.399
integrity, public institutions. It's a lot. We'll

00:00:36.399 --> 00:00:38.679
dig into these threads, pull out the key takeaways,

00:00:38.859 --> 00:00:40.799
and help you understand what might be happening

00:00:40.799 --> 00:00:42.960
behind the headlines. So the big question seems

00:00:42.960 --> 00:00:45.899
to be, how do things like a firing at the Bureau

00:00:45.899 --> 00:00:48.560
of Labor Statistics? Or a fight in the Texas

00:00:48.560 --> 00:00:51.060
legislature? Or the Epstein files fall out? Yeah.

00:00:51.280 --> 00:00:53.399
How do they all connect? It points to this broader

00:00:53.399 --> 00:00:56.020
struggle over information, right? Who controls

00:00:56.020 --> 00:00:58.399
the narrative? Let's unpack that. Starting with

00:00:58.399 --> 00:01:01.259
Epstein seems unavoidable. Yeah, especially its

00:01:01.259 --> 00:01:03.799
relevance for someone like Donald Trump. Ezra

00:01:03.799 --> 00:01:06.060
Klein's interview with Will Summer really nails

00:01:06.060 --> 00:01:09.599
it. The short answer is QAnon. OK, so to get

00:01:09.599 --> 00:01:11.840
this, we need to understand the QAnon worldview,

00:01:12.079 --> 00:01:15.200
right? Yeah. What's their core belief about figures

00:01:15.200 --> 00:01:17.900
like Epstein? Well, fundamentally, it's that

00:01:17.900 --> 00:01:20.219
corrupt, pedophilic elites control everything.

00:01:20.430 --> 00:01:23.650
Think back to Pizzagate, that kind of wild baseless

00:01:23.650 --> 00:01:27.150
theory. Right. QAnon believers have this almost

00:01:27.150 --> 00:01:30.090
religious intensity about Epstein being central

00:01:30.090 --> 00:01:32.430
to that cabal. And Trump's role in this worldview.

00:01:32.849 --> 00:01:35.109
For them, almost every politician is corrupt

00:01:35.109 --> 00:01:38.090
except Trump. He's seen as, you know, uncorrupted,

00:01:38.170 --> 00:01:40.349
maybe even set by God, some believe. To train

00:01:40.349 --> 00:01:42.790
the swamp. Exactly. To clean out the swamp and

00:01:42.790 --> 00:01:45.250
expose this massive conspiracy. They attribute

00:01:45.250 --> 00:01:48.609
everything. Job losses, cancer, high rent, wars.

00:01:48.920 --> 00:01:51.739
to these elites. Some even believe truly extreme

00:01:51.739 --> 00:01:54.180
things like ritual abuse. Yeah, some go that

00:01:54.180 --> 00:01:56.959
far. Ritual child murder for blood. Red shoes

00:01:56.959 --> 00:01:59.459
is an insider sign. It's pretty dark. And the

00:01:59.459 --> 00:02:02.019
core idea is that arresting just a few key people

00:02:02.019 --> 00:02:03.939
would fix everything. Which leads to the storm

00:02:03.939 --> 00:02:08.240
idea. Precisely. The storm was their belief that

00:02:08.240 --> 00:02:11.379
Trump would order mass arrests, take out these

00:02:11.379 --> 00:02:14.419
elites in Hollywood, banking the Democratic Party.

00:02:14.569 --> 00:02:16.789
And people genuinely believe this was imminent,

00:02:16.990 --> 00:02:19.430
like Ashley Babbitt on January 6th. Tragically,

00:02:19.610 --> 00:02:22.349
yes. She believed the storm was here. It started

00:02:22.349 --> 00:02:25.330
on like obscure message boards, then spread to

00:02:25.330 --> 00:02:28.250
social media and then became almost mainstream.

00:02:28.750 --> 00:02:31.169
Millions bought into it. So from Trump's perspective,

00:02:31.229 --> 00:02:33.789
how did he handle this? It's a powerful group

00:02:33.789 --> 00:02:36.530
of believers. Well, the analysis suggests he

00:02:36.530 --> 00:02:38.889
didn't actually believe the crazy story himself.

00:02:39.229 --> 00:02:41.909
But he saw that millions of his supporters did.

00:02:42.310 --> 00:02:44.870
They bought into it hook, line and sinker. So

00:02:44.870 --> 00:02:47.250
he played along. He tantalized them with promises

00:02:47.250 --> 00:02:49.310
during the campaign. The thinking seems to have

00:02:49.310 --> 00:02:51.610
been, you know, get elected then forget the whole

00:02:51.610 --> 00:02:54.069
thing. And initially his supporters were thrilled

00:02:54.069 --> 00:02:56.330
when he appointed people like Cash Patel or Dan

00:02:56.330 --> 00:02:58.349
Bongino. Oh, yeah, they were delirious with joy.

00:02:58.409 --> 00:03:01.030
They saw them as fellow travelers, major conspiracy

00:03:01.030 --> 00:03:03.909
theorists. They thought finally someone in power

00:03:03.909 --> 00:03:06.189
was going to spill the beans. But then Epstein

00:03:06.189 --> 00:03:08.590
gets arrested. That must have seemed like validation

00:03:08.590 --> 00:03:12.810
at first. Absolutely. QAnon naturally assumed,

00:03:13.129 --> 00:03:15.639
OK, this is it. Trump's on the right trail. So

00:03:15.639 --> 00:03:18.659
what changed? The big shock was when Trump and

00:03:18.659 --> 00:03:21.659
his lawyer, Pam Bondi, basically said, hold on,

00:03:22.060 --> 00:03:24.360
there's no list, no cabal, nobody's getting arrested,

00:03:24.560 --> 00:03:28.319
please forget it. Wow, that must have been jarring.

00:03:28.539 --> 00:03:30.860
Jarring is an understatement. For them, it meant

00:03:30.860 --> 00:03:34.219
their entire mythology was a fable. One source

00:03:34.219 --> 00:03:36.539
compared it to the pope announcing Jesus never

00:03:36.539 --> 00:03:39.379
existed. It shook them to their very foundations.

00:03:39.740 --> 00:03:42.439
So how has that fallout settled? Are they just

00:03:42.439 --> 00:03:46.259
moving on? Not at all. QAnon and a lot of MAGA

00:03:46.259 --> 00:03:49.620
people have no intention whatsoever of just letting

00:03:49.620 --> 00:03:52.400
this drop. They feel Trump switched teams, that

00:03:52.400 --> 00:03:54.620
he's hiding it. So the perceived stalling just

00:03:54.620 --> 00:03:57.020
makes it worse for them. Exactly. It fuels the

00:03:57.020 --> 00:03:59.479
suspicion. This story isn't fading. Which brings

00:03:59.479 --> 00:04:01.340
us to Barry Levine's piece in the New York Times.

00:04:01.439 --> 00:04:03.780
He's covered Epstein for years, wrote a book,

00:04:04.039 --> 00:04:06.599
and he has nine big questions. Yeah, and they

00:04:06.599 --> 00:04:08.900
are fundamental questions. First, the money.

00:04:09.069 --> 00:04:11.550
Where did Epstein get it? Yeah. A billion dollars

00:04:11.550 --> 00:04:14.069
wired to his account. With no obvious source,

00:04:14.090 --> 00:04:17.430
like a start -up or CEO role. Right. Who sent

00:04:17.430 --> 00:04:20.170
it? Why? That seems like something the Fed should

00:04:20.170 --> 00:04:21.709
be able to figure out, doesn't it? You'd think

00:04:21.709 --> 00:04:25.110
so. Then there's the spy angle. Yes. The Acosta

00:04:25.110 --> 00:04:27.870
quote is pretty damning. Rene Acosta, who later

00:04:27.870 --> 00:04:30.410
became Trump's labor secretary, said he was told

00:04:30.410 --> 00:04:32.449
Epstein belonged to intelligence and I should

00:04:32.449 --> 00:04:35.089
leave him alone. Who told him that? And was the

00:04:35.089 --> 00:04:38.629
cabinet job related? Big questions. Huge. And

00:04:38.629 --> 00:04:42.310
then, Trump's own potential involvement. Pam

00:04:42.310 --> 00:04:44.310
Bondi allegedly told him he was in the Epstein

00:04:44.310 --> 00:04:47.250
files. Reports of FBI agents removing documents

00:04:47.250 --> 00:04:49.649
mentioning him. How much is true? We don't know.

00:04:49.769 --> 00:04:52.689
And Bill Clinton. 21 phone numbers in Epstein's

00:04:52.689 --> 00:04:55.089
little black book. What was that relationship

00:04:55.089 --> 00:04:57.709
really? Beyond Prince Andrew, who else was involved?

00:04:57.829 --> 00:05:00.589
Who were the clients on the island? Any frequent

00:05:00.589 --> 00:05:03.209
flyers? And who helped Epstein? Besides Ghislaine

00:05:03.209 --> 00:05:05.600
Maxwell. There's the mysterious death of Jean

00:05:05.600 --> 00:05:09.339
-Luc Brunel, the French modeling scout, in a

00:05:09.339 --> 00:05:11.480
Paris prison. What about the contents of the

00:05:11.480 --> 00:05:14.920
safe rated by the FBI? A three -page index listing.

00:05:15.439 --> 00:05:19.600
40 computers, 26 hard disks, 70 CDs, recording

00:05:19.600 --> 00:05:22.980
devices, thousands of compact disks. People want

00:05:22.980 --> 00:05:25.139
that list made public. And the videos? Why can't

00:05:25.139 --> 00:05:27.660
they be released? Levine suggests blurring tech

00:05:27.660 --> 00:05:30.339
exists. Right, like Google Maps uses. And finally,

00:05:30.480 --> 00:05:32.860
the autopsy report. The full report by Kristin

00:05:32.860 --> 00:05:36.339
Roman. DNA tests on the sheet. Did other prisoners

00:05:36.339 --> 00:05:39.259
hear anything? These are specific, pointed questions.

00:05:39.300 --> 00:05:41.480
They are. And the feeling is, much of the country

00:05:41.480 --> 00:05:43.740
wants to know, but the response is stonewalling.

00:05:43.920 --> 00:05:46.540
which, as Levine notes, didn't work out so well

00:05:46.540 --> 00:05:49.160
for Nixon. It just keeps the story alive. So

00:05:49.160 --> 00:05:52.459
this isn't going away for potential 2028 Republican

00:05:52.459 --> 00:05:55.019
candidates either. It could linger into the 27

00:05:55.019 --> 00:05:57.500
primary. Seems very likely. The more stonewalling,

00:05:57.519 --> 00:05:59.779
the longer it lasts. And it creates a real dilemma

00:05:59.779 --> 00:06:02.360
for them. Align with Trump? Nothing to see here.

00:06:02.560 --> 00:06:05.139
Or align with the base demanding answers. Exactly.

00:06:05.379 --> 00:06:07.860
And the assumption is, if you're demanding transparency,

00:06:08.300 --> 00:06:10.500
you're probably not in the files yourself. But

00:06:10.500 --> 00:06:13.120
taking a stance now is risky, isn't it? What

00:06:13.120 --> 00:06:16.220
if new information surfaces? Totally. It's playing

00:06:16.220 --> 00:06:18.879
with fire. Imagine if videos came out showing,

00:06:18.879 --> 00:06:22.459
you know, a dozen congressional Republicans committing

00:06:22.459 --> 00:06:26.000
statutory rape, live and in color. Any stance

00:06:26.000 --> 00:06:28.500
taken now could look terrible. High stakes indeed.

00:06:28.740 --> 00:06:31.079
So who's aligning where? among the potential

00:06:31.079 --> 00:06:33.600
candidates. Well, demanding release, siding with

00:06:33.600 --> 00:06:35.800
the base. You've got Senators Ted Cruz, Josh

00:06:35.800 --> 00:06:38.339
Hawley, Rand Paul. They're staying visible, taking

00:06:38.339 --> 00:06:40.959
positions. Cruz with his media presence, Hawley

00:06:40.959 --> 00:06:43.939
on issues like stock trading bans, Paul doing

00:06:43.939 --> 00:06:46.339
early state visits. Right. And then on the other

00:06:46.339 --> 00:06:48.660
side, with Trump's nothing to see here line,

00:06:49.279 --> 00:06:52.620
you have J .D. Vance, Marco Rubio, Kristi Noem.

00:06:52.680 --> 00:06:54.540
And some are trying to stay out of it. For now,

00:06:54.720 --> 00:06:56.779
yeah. Governors like Brian Kemp, Glenn Youngkin,

00:06:56.980 --> 00:06:58.800
Sarah Huckabee Sanders seem to be waiting it

00:06:58.800 --> 00:07:00.850
out. What about the actual voters? Where did

00:07:00.850 --> 00:07:03.769
they stand? Polls show almost 80 percent of Trump

00:07:03.769 --> 00:07:05.970
voters want to get to the bottom of this. And

00:07:05.970 --> 00:07:08.069
over half 52 percent think the government is

00:07:08.069 --> 00:07:11.149
covering things up. Interesting. Even non -politicians

00:07:11.149 --> 00:07:13.769
who support Trump are pushing back on this. Yeah,

00:07:13.769 --> 00:07:15.850
figures like Mike Cernovich, Mike Lindell, Joe

00:07:15.850 --> 00:07:18.670
Rogan, Andrew Schultz, Steve Bannon. They're

00:07:18.670 --> 00:07:20.490
attacking Trump for not releasing everything.

00:07:20.689 --> 00:07:23.449
They're actually siding with the base against

00:07:23.449 --> 00:07:26.829
Trump on this one issue. So while that struggle

00:07:26.829 --> 00:07:29.959
over inflation plays out. There's the more traditional

00:07:29.959 --> 00:07:33.560
power struggle. Campaign money. Right. And Democrats

00:07:33.560 --> 00:07:35.939
aren't really agonizing over Epstein. They're

00:07:35.939 --> 00:07:38.699
focused on more conventional campaign stuff.

00:07:38.860 --> 00:07:40.839
Raising money, building infrastructure, leaving

00:07:40.839 --> 00:07:43.339
those FEC paper trails. It's all about being

00:07:43.339 --> 00:07:46.699
a team player for 2026, helping win back the

00:07:46.699 --> 00:07:49.500
House and Senate. That means fundraising, spending,

00:07:49.860 --> 00:07:52.240
campaigning in key places. Pete Buttigieg is

00:07:52.240 --> 00:07:54.600
leading the pack so far. Yeah, $1 .6 million

00:07:54.600 --> 00:07:57.600
bank this year, paying staff. Governors are more

00:07:57.600 --> 00:08:00.100
in the hundreds of thousands range, with super

00:08:00.100 --> 00:08:02.540
PACs handling bigger costs like travel and polling.

00:08:02.740 --> 00:08:05.540
And a lot of that early money is about raising

00:08:05.540 --> 00:08:08.199
more money, buying donor lists. Exactly. People

00:08:08.199 --> 00:08:10.040
like Beshear in Kentucky and Whitmer in Michigan,

00:08:10.240 --> 00:08:12.620
they're investing in lists. Their emails might

00:08:12.620 --> 00:08:15.120
ask you to donate to the DNC or DSCC, but they

00:08:15.120 --> 00:08:17.519
also boost their own profile. And Newsom is using

00:08:17.519 --> 00:08:19.860
his big donor network to help others building

00:08:19.860 --> 00:08:22.759
Goodwill. Precisely. They've all got super PACs,

00:08:22.899 --> 00:08:24.740
digital operations ramping up, some are running

00:08:24.740 --> 00:08:27.319
national ads if they're less known. Like Beshear

00:08:27.319 --> 00:08:29.639
campaigning down in South Carolina already. Right.

00:08:29.699 --> 00:08:32.200
And even governors up for re -election in 26,

00:08:32.360 --> 00:08:34.919
like Shapiro and PA or Moore and MD, they focus

00:08:34.919 --> 00:08:37.500
on that. But raising money nationally for their

00:08:37.500 --> 00:08:40.320
own race lets them meet key players everywhere.

00:08:40.519 --> 00:08:43.220
OK, but here's the kicker. While the race is

00:08:43.220 --> 00:08:46.940
on, Republicans are financially Way ahead. Yeah,

00:08:47.179 --> 00:08:50.370
the disparity is stark. Maggio Inc, the main

00:08:50.370 --> 00:08:54.830
GOP super PAC, pulled in $177 million in the

00:08:54.830 --> 00:08:57.750
first half of 2025. A lot from crypto sources

00:08:57.750 --> 00:08:59.990
rewarded with things like a strategic Bitcoin

00:08:59.990 --> 00:09:02.649
reserve. Sounds interesting. Let's just say it

00:09:02.649 --> 00:09:05.210
contrasts sharply with the main Democratic super

00:09:05.210 --> 00:09:07.370
PAC, Future Forward. Right. They have about $2

00:09:07.370 --> 00:09:09.809
,800 on hand and are apparently still paying

00:09:09.809 --> 00:09:12.450
back money from crypto execs now in prison. Ouch.

00:09:12.649 --> 00:09:14.870
And it's bad down ballot, too. Yep. The House

00:09:14.870 --> 00:09:17.549
GOP fund has $11 million more than the Dems.

00:09:17.710 --> 00:09:20.690
The Senate GOP fund has 16 million dollars more,

00:09:20.970 --> 00:09:23.029
plus the Democrats have 21 million dollars in

00:09:23.029 --> 00:09:26.269
debt left over from 2024. So why the big gap?

00:09:26.370 --> 00:09:28.789
What's the underlying dynamic? Fundamentally,

00:09:28.970 --> 00:09:31.330
rich people and corporations generally get a

00:09:31.330 --> 00:09:33.809
better deal from Republicans. That's a strong

00:09:33.809 --> 00:09:36.309
incentive. While Democrats rely more on small

00:09:36.309 --> 00:09:38.610
donors who aren't focused on midterms yet. Right.

00:09:38.970 --> 00:09:40.929
Small donors don't usually pay much attention

00:09:40.929 --> 00:09:44.059
to midterms, especially this far out. Plus, the

00:09:44.059 --> 00:09:46.299
party in power can always offer valuable favors

00:09:46.299 --> 00:09:48.899
to potential donors. And donors usually focus

00:09:48.899 --> 00:09:52.720
on the next election at most. Shifting globally

00:09:52.720 --> 00:09:55.259
trade deals. Trump's had some wins with the UK,

00:09:55.539 --> 00:09:59.360
Japan, EU, but China remains the elusive one.

00:09:59.460 --> 00:10:01.919
And they won't just roll over and beg like the

00:10:01.919 --> 00:10:05.039
EU perhaps did. No, Xi Jinping has significant

00:10:05.039 --> 00:10:07.419
advantages. He doesn't face elections, so he

00:10:07.419 --> 00:10:09.539
can impose more pain on his people if needed.

00:10:09.759 --> 00:10:12.679
And strategic resources. Rare earths. Exactly.

00:10:12.809 --> 00:10:15.490
China has those rare earth elements America needs.

00:10:16.009 --> 00:10:18.350
Xi can control sales. Big consequences for U

00:10:18.350 --> 00:10:20.789
.S. companies. Plus, China makes tons of parts

00:10:20.789 --> 00:10:23.710
for jets, phones. Taxing those exports is easy

00:10:23.710 --> 00:10:25.769
for him. And the trade balance. U .S. imports

00:10:25.769 --> 00:10:27.870
lots of agricultural goods from Trump's base.

00:10:28.309 --> 00:10:31.389
Correct. China exports way more to the U .S.

00:10:31.549 --> 00:10:35.110
450 BME versus 150 BME. U .S. imports include

00:10:35.110 --> 00:10:38.649
a lot of farm products. She could sign long -term

00:10:38.649 --> 00:10:41.269
contracts for Brazilian soybeans, for instance,

00:10:41.690 --> 00:10:44.370
that would very much upset Trump's base. He also

00:10:44.370 --> 00:10:46.730
doesn't have to convince 27 other leaders, unlike

00:10:46.730 --> 00:10:49.309
the EU chief. Right. That gives him far more

00:10:49.309 --> 00:10:51.789
power. The idea of Trump doing a one -on -one

00:10:51.789 --> 00:10:54.429
visit to show off his deal -making skills, sources

00:10:54.429 --> 00:10:57.850
say that will never work. Why not? Because frankly,

00:10:58.009 --> 00:11:00.389
the analysis suggests Trump doesn't understand

00:11:00.389 --> 00:11:03.529
any of the details of trade. She, however, is

00:11:03.529 --> 00:11:05.840
prepped. Talks to experts for hours and won't

00:11:05.840 --> 00:11:08.200
just agree on the spot to some crazy proposal.

00:11:08.360 --> 00:11:11.240
So if Trump imposes high tariffs, G likely blocks

00:11:11.240 --> 00:11:14.299
exports of key materials and parts. That could

00:11:14.299 --> 00:11:16.360
shut down U .S. companies, maybe even trigger

00:11:16.360 --> 00:11:18.519
a recession. A deal might still happen through

00:11:18.519 --> 00:11:20.740
lower level talks, but it won't be one sided

00:11:20.740 --> 00:11:22.820
like the EU one. Unless it's one sided against

00:11:22.820 --> 00:11:24.740
the U .S.? That's a possibility some sources

00:11:24.740 --> 00:11:27.179
raise. OK, let's bring it back home. Institutional

00:11:27.179 --> 00:11:29.870
integrity. The Senate went quiet for August recess,

00:11:29.909 --> 00:11:32.750
but right before Schumer and Thune cut a deal

00:11:32.750 --> 00:11:35.509
on some nominees. Not all, though. Yeah. And

00:11:35.509 --> 00:11:38.309
one confirmation was pretty controversial. Jeanine

00:11:38.309 --> 00:11:42.549
Pirro, as U .S. attorney for D .C., former prosecutors

00:11:42.549 --> 00:11:46.490
and judges called her totally unfit. Her stated

00:11:46.490 --> 00:11:50.669
goal, prosecute Trump's enemies, raises impartiality

00:11:50.669 --> 00:11:53.169
questions. Yeah, the minority party can't block,

00:11:53.450 --> 00:11:56.070
but they can slow things down, which annoys Trump.

00:11:56.309 --> 00:11:58.860
Right. And Thune, the majority leader, thought

00:11:58.860 --> 00:12:01.399
about going nuclear, stripping that minority

00:12:01.399 --> 00:12:04.360
power. But he's been around. He knows the shoe

00:12:04.360 --> 00:12:06.399
may be on the other foot someday. A Democratic

00:12:06.399 --> 00:12:08.179
Senate could ram through their own people later.

00:12:08.500 --> 00:12:11.000
Exactly. Trump doesn't care about post -2029,

00:12:11.240 --> 00:12:14.159
but Thune, at 64, definitely does. He's playing

00:12:14.159 --> 00:12:16.940
the long game. Meanwhile, in Texas, Republicans

00:12:16.940 --> 00:12:19.679
are pushing a new redistricting map. They played

00:12:19.679 --> 00:12:22.320
it safe in 2020, protecting incumbents. Which

00:12:22.320 --> 00:12:25.360
was seen as a good decision then. But now Trump

00:12:25.360 --> 00:12:27.259
apparently demanded they be aggressive and try

00:12:27.259 --> 00:12:29.059
to win five more House seats. And they said,

00:12:29.120 --> 00:12:31.279
yes, sir, even if it was against their better

00:12:31.279 --> 00:12:33.500
judgment. Seems that way. They do this new map

00:12:33.500 --> 00:12:35.779
and the media mostly assumed, OK, GOP just picked

00:12:35.779 --> 00:12:38.899
up five seats. But not so fast. There's a flaw.

00:12:39.179 --> 00:12:41.440
Potentially a big one. Four of the five tweaked

00:12:41.440 --> 00:12:44.759
districts are now majority Latino. The assumption

00:12:44.759 --> 00:12:47.059
was based on Trump getting 55 percent of the

00:12:47.059 --> 00:12:50.500
Latino vote in 2024. But gerrymandering 101 says

00:12:50.500 --> 00:12:53.440
you need reliable voters. Exactly. And it's.

00:12:53.470 --> 00:12:56.009
Far from clear that Latinos are reliable Republicans.

00:12:56.490 --> 00:12:59.850
Even if some like Trump personally in 24, that

00:12:59.850 --> 00:13:03.190
calculation might be faulty. Because things have

00:13:03.190 --> 00:13:05.850
changed since November 2024, Latino sentiment

00:13:05.850 --> 00:13:08.730
has shifted. Significantly, it seems. Many Latinos

00:13:08.730 --> 00:13:12.110
are souring on Trump. Why? Deportations and tariffs.

00:13:12.409 --> 00:13:14.970
I see arresting people without trial doesn't

00:13:14.970 --> 00:13:17.190
build goodwill. Not exactly. And the tariffs

00:13:17.190 --> 00:13:19.250
are hitting trade with Mexico, hurting jobs,

00:13:19.350 --> 00:13:21.070
especially in South Texas. What are the polls

00:13:21.070 --> 00:13:23.789
showing now? Nationwide, Trump's approval with

00:13:23.789 --> 00:13:26.610
Latinos is around 36%. That's down 19 points

00:13:26.610 --> 00:13:29.409
from the 24 exit polls. Probably worse in Texas

00:13:29.409 --> 00:13:32.309
because of the direct impact of policies. Plus...

00:13:32.120 --> 00:13:34.039
You know, it's perceived lack of interest in

00:13:34.039 --> 00:13:36.159
helping flood victims there. So this dummymander,

00:13:36.220 --> 00:13:38.220
as some are calling it, could backfire badly.

00:13:38.539 --> 00:13:40.960
It absolutely could. These districts aren't guaranteed

00:13:40.960 --> 00:13:44.279
wins. Republicans could lose them all. If Dems

00:13:44.279 --> 00:13:47.340
run local Latinos and hammer on deportations

00:13:47.340 --> 00:13:50.649
and tariffs, forget gaining seats. Could it be

00:13:50.649 --> 00:13:54.129
even worse, like a blue wave making safe GOP

00:13:54.129 --> 00:13:57.190
seats vulnerable? That's the risk. Basing everything

00:13:57.190 --> 00:14:00.149
on only one election is dangerous. And this is

00:14:00.149 --> 00:14:04.049
causing pushback even within the Texas GOP from

00:14:04.049 --> 00:14:05.509
Latino Republicans. Yeah, they're hearing it

00:14:05.509 --> 00:14:07.549
from constituents and they're starting to do

00:14:07.549 --> 00:14:10.350
the unthinkable, advocating for some undocumented

00:14:10.350 --> 00:14:13.389
immigrants like DREAMers. Like Rep Salazar in

00:14:13.389 --> 00:14:16.830
Florida, supporting a path to citizenship, that's

00:14:16.830 --> 00:14:19.169
heresy to the Trump line. It is. She made a point

00:14:19.169 --> 00:14:21.190
about past shameful treatment of immigrants.

00:14:21.750 --> 00:14:23.509
Although it's noted she did vote for the bill,

00:14:23.730 --> 00:14:28.110
giving ICC $75 billion for roundups. So it's

00:14:28.110 --> 00:14:30.529
complicated. And the Democrats' response? Fleeing

00:14:30.529 --> 00:14:32.690
the state. Yep. The quorum break stunt. They've

00:14:32.690 --> 00:14:34.970
decamped to Illinois. Guests of Governor Pritzker.

00:14:35.330 --> 00:14:37.289
Texas police can't arrest them there. Pritzker

00:14:37.289 --> 00:14:39.649
will shred extradition requests. They can't stay

00:14:39.649 --> 00:14:41.879
there forever, obviously. Probably not till November

00:14:41.879 --> 00:14:45.159
2026. But the stunt gets national attention on

00:14:45.159 --> 00:14:47.679
the redistricting and maybe pushes other states

00:14:47.679 --> 00:14:50.019
like California or New York towards countermeasures.

00:14:50.279 --> 00:14:52.179
Can Governor Abbott just replace them, though?

00:14:52.399 --> 00:14:55.240
No, not unilaterally. Expulsion needs a two -thirds

00:14:55.240 --> 00:14:57.840
vote in the House 100 votes. That's extremely

00:14:57.840 --> 00:15:00.679
rare. Like only happened once since 1927 for

00:15:00.679 --> 00:15:03.019
misconduct. Exactly. And quorum breaks. They

00:15:03.019 --> 00:15:06.159
have a storied tradition in Texas. 1870, 1979,

00:15:06.519 --> 00:15:09.840
2003, 2021. None of those lawmakers were expelled

00:15:09.840 --> 00:15:11.539
for it. The publicans don't have the 100 votes

00:15:11.539 --> 00:15:14.820
needed. Right. They have 88. The threshold protects

00:15:14.820 --> 00:15:17.159
against political overreach. Quorum breaks are

00:15:17.159 --> 00:15:19.899
basically minority resistance made possible by

00:15:19.899 --> 00:15:23.279
the state's own rules. OK, next up. The integrity

00:15:23.279 --> 00:15:26.440
of economic data. Friday's firing of the BLS

00:15:26.440 --> 00:15:29.200
commissioner, Erica McIntarfer, that really shook

00:15:29.200 --> 00:15:31.399
things up. It did. She was about an appointee,

00:15:31.759 --> 00:15:34.679
fired after a weak jobs report and downward revisions.

00:15:34.980 --> 00:15:36.860
Trump immediately claimed the data was rigged

00:15:36.860 --> 00:15:38.779
to make him look bad. Even without evidence,

00:15:38.919 --> 00:15:41.279
he's disputed data before, right? Inflation numbers.

00:15:41.700 --> 00:15:44.899
Repeatedly. This latest move alarmed economists

00:15:44.899 --> 00:15:48.000
across the political spectrum and federal statisticians.

00:15:48.440 --> 00:15:51.600
It amplified fears about institutional capture.

00:15:51.860 --> 00:15:55.320
And the BLS is crucial. 140 years old produces

00:15:55.320 --> 00:15:58.240
the monthly jobs report everyone watches. Markets,

00:15:58.419 --> 00:16:01.379
policies, public mood, they all rely on that

00:16:01.379 --> 00:16:04.139
data. Direct interference with the professionals

00:16:04.139 --> 00:16:07.799
who compile it is rare and potentially destabilizing.

00:16:07.929 --> 00:16:10.309
How is this data usually protected from politics?

00:16:10.769 --> 00:16:14.129
Agencies like BLS, BEA, Census Bureau operate

00:16:14.129 --> 00:16:15.960
under established protocols. They're meant to

00:16:15.960 --> 00:16:19.000
be insulated. It's career civil servants, not

00:16:19.000 --> 00:16:21.399
political appointees, who design surveys, collect

00:16:21.399 --> 00:16:24.159
data. The processes are complex, entrenched the

00:16:24.159 --> 00:16:26.279
bedrock of policy and market confidence. But

00:16:26.279 --> 00:16:28.299
there are weak points. A president can't just

00:16:28.299 --> 00:16:30.720
order a change in the inflation rate. No, but

00:16:30.720 --> 00:16:32.840
they can influence appointments, shift incentives,

00:16:33.039 --> 00:16:35.340
change funding, or just undermine trust in the

00:16:35.340 --> 00:16:37.860
results. Trump calling unemployment phony or

00:16:37.860 --> 00:16:40.320
inflation fake laid the groundwork for suspicion.

00:16:40.539 --> 00:16:42.799
So the fear now is more about subtle manipulation,

00:16:43.080 --> 00:16:46.220
putting loyalists in key spots. Exactly. That

00:16:46.220 --> 00:16:49.559
opens the door. Maybe methodology gets quietly

00:16:49.559 --> 00:16:52.120
revised to downplay people leaving the workforce.

00:16:52.840 --> 00:16:56.919
Or a GDP report is delayed due to technical review.

00:16:57.360 --> 00:17:00.320
Small moves that erode credibility quickly. And

00:17:00.320 --> 00:17:02.919
just raising the possibility of fraud is damaging.

00:17:03.100 --> 00:17:05.559
It can be enough to destabilize public faith

00:17:05.559 --> 00:17:08.400
and undermine trust, even if the numbers themselves

00:17:08.400 --> 00:17:11.029
aren't touched. Is there a check on this? Non

00:17:11.029 --> 00:17:13.630
-governmental data sources? Thankfully, yes.

00:17:14.109 --> 00:17:16.549
The U .S. has a whole ecosystem of them. The

00:17:16.549 --> 00:17:20.450
Conference Board's LEI, ADP payrolls, ISM indices,

00:17:20.950 --> 00:17:23.569
NFE, Small Business Index, University of Michigan

00:17:23.569 --> 00:17:26.109
consumer sentiment. Real estate data from CoreLogic,

00:17:26.210 --> 00:17:28.910
Zillow, Redfin, commodity prices, shipping. All

00:17:28.910 --> 00:17:31.170
of that. They serve as a vital check on government

00:17:31.170 --> 00:17:33.569
narratives, a reality check. What about the institutional

00:17:33.569 --> 00:17:35.849
safeguards? How strong are they? They exist,

00:17:36.109 --> 00:17:37.769
but their strength really depends on leadership

00:17:37.769 --> 00:17:39.910
respecting them and vigilance from outsiders,

00:17:40.609 --> 00:17:43.190
Congress, press, groups like the American Statistical

00:17:43.190 --> 00:17:45.769
Association. But sustained attacks, firings,

00:17:45.849 --> 00:17:48.089
that takes a toll regardless. Definitely. It

00:17:48.089 --> 00:17:51.250
leads to staff leaving, delays in updates, lower

00:17:51.250 --> 00:17:54.369
morale. That degrades data quality even without

00:17:54.369 --> 00:17:57.210
fabrication. And re -brilling lost confidence.

00:17:57.710 --> 00:18:00.420
Much harder. This isn't just politics. It's about

00:18:00.420 --> 00:18:02.839
governance, how we react to economic signals.

00:18:03.240 --> 00:18:06.619
Precisely. The firing sends a message. Deliver

00:18:06.619 --> 00:18:09.500
bad news. Get punished. That's a dangerous precedent.

00:18:10.180 --> 00:18:13.079
It's about soft power, eroding trust, reshaping

00:18:13.079 --> 00:18:15.480
narratives, undermining institutions. Related

00:18:15.480 --> 00:18:19.259
to institutions, a Fed governor resigned. Adriana

00:18:19.259 --> 00:18:22.539
Kukler. A lucky break for Trump. You can see

00:18:22.539 --> 00:18:24.660
it that way. Trump desperately wants lower interest

00:18:24.660 --> 00:18:27.019
rates, good for his real estate background, lowers

00:18:27.019 --> 00:18:28.980
federal debt payments. Though maybe he doesn't

00:18:28.980 --> 00:18:32.859
realize low rates fuel inflation. Possibly not.

00:18:33.000 --> 00:18:34.960
He's even talked about firing Fed Chair Powell,

00:18:35.160 --> 00:18:37.420
his own nominee, though that's legally tricky.

00:18:37.960 --> 00:18:40.460
Anyway, Kugler, a Biden appointee, resigned a

00:18:40.460 --> 00:18:42.460
little bit early, gives Trump an early appointment.

00:18:42.619 --> 00:18:44.500
And that means Republican appointees will now

00:18:44.500 --> 00:18:47.480
have a majority on the Fed board. Yes, which

00:18:47.480 --> 00:18:50.059
they didn't before. So does this mean lower rates

00:18:50.059 --> 00:18:53.059
are coming? Maybe. Depends on Powell. If he's

00:18:53.059 --> 00:18:55.019
against it, the votes aren't there. Probably.

00:18:55.460 --> 00:18:58.250
If he's for it, they will be. The Fed's mission

00:18:58.250 --> 00:19:00.950
includes keeping inflation in check, and the

00:19:00.950 --> 00:19:03.170
14 -year terms are meant to insulate them from

00:19:03.170 --> 00:19:06.789
pressure. But this president has a knack for

00:19:06.789 --> 00:19:09.529
bending people to his will. He's extraordinarily

00:19:09.529 --> 00:19:12.589
good at it, reports suggest. A majority of his

00:19:12.589 --> 00:19:15.470
people on the board makes the task much easier.

00:19:15.829 --> 00:19:17.890
Finally, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting

00:19:17.890 --> 00:19:20.809
shut down. Yeah, another move related to information

00:19:20.809 --> 00:19:23.400
control. Authoritarians always try to control

00:19:23.400 --> 00:19:25.740
the information flow. Trump's internalized this.

00:19:25.880 --> 00:19:29.559
Even suing media outlets. Seems so. For MPR and

00:19:29.559 --> 00:19:32.920
PBS via CPB, it was a different tactic. Republicans

00:19:32.920 --> 00:19:35.099
pushed through rescissions, cutting off all its

00:19:35.099 --> 00:19:37.539
funding. And CPB announced Friday it has to shut

00:19:37.539 --> 00:19:39.740
down. Mission accomplished, as one source put

00:19:39.740 --> 00:19:42.980
it. Grimly, yes. And the hardest hit. Rural areas.

00:19:43.279 --> 00:19:45.119
You know, where many Trump voters live. Because

00:19:45.119 --> 00:19:47.900
CPB funds a big chunk of their local MPR and

00:19:47.900 --> 00:19:50.220
PBS stations. Exactly. Without it, they can't

00:19:50.220 --> 00:19:52.710
make ends meet. Urban stations can fundraise

00:19:52.710 --> 00:19:54.950
from wealthy donors, maybe even use the shutdown

00:19:54.950 --> 00:19:58.049
as a rallying cry. Less true in rural areas.

00:19:58.390 --> 00:20:01.289
So the result is more reliance on Fox News for

00:20:01.289 --> 00:20:03.829
information in those areas. That appears to be

00:20:03.829 --> 00:20:06.750
the likely outcome. And Trump probably doesn't

00:20:06.750 --> 00:20:09.630
mind this so much. One last observation from

00:20:09.630 --> 00:20:13.509
the sources, George W. Bush's silence. It's noted

00:20:13.509 --> 00:20:16.660
as curious. He's alive. His opinion still matters

00:20:16.660 --> 00:20:19.039
to many Republicans. A statement that Trump's

00:20:19.039 --> 00:20:20.960
actions affront traditional GOP values could

00:20:20.960 --> 00:20:24.299
have an impact. But he's been as quiet as a mouse.

00:20:25.039 --> 00:20:27.920
OK, quite a deep dive today. What really stands

00:20:27.920 --> 00:20:29.859
out, we've seen how things that seem separate,

00:20:30.160 --> 00:20:34.140
Epstein fallout, campaign cash, Texas gerrymandering,

00:20:34.640 --> 00:20:36.910
data integrity, they're all tangled up. Yeah,

00:20:36.990 --> 00:20:38.789
they're part of this bigger story about power,

00:20:39.049 --> 00:20:41.309
information, trust, and institutions. It really

00:20:41.309 --> 00:20:43.089
reminds you that under the daily news churn,

00:20:43.450 --> 00:20:46.029
these fundamental forces are shaping how we see

00:20:46.029 --> 00:20:47.869
reality. Right. So here's something to think

00:20:47.869 --> 00:20:51.250
about. In a time when trust in official data

00:20:51.250 --> 00:20:54.089
in established stories is being challenged so

00:20:54.089 --> 00:20:57.069
much, how do we navigate that? How do you personally

00:20:57.069 --> 00:20:58.950
figure out what's true, what's important, what

00:20:58.950 --> 00:21:00.869
really matters for the future? Definitely something

00:21:00.869 --> 00:21:01.750
to mull over this week.
