WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:02.279
ever feel like you're just drowning in information?

00:00:03.060 --> 00:00:05.040
You know, news alerts popping up constantly.

00:00:05.179 --> 00:00:07.200
Oh, absolutely. International crisis one minute,

00:00:07.400 --> 00:00:10.859
local politics next. It's just, it's a lot. And

00:00:10.859 --> 00:00:13.019
figuring out what actually matters, how it all

00:00:13.019 --> 00:00:15.519
connects, that feels like work sometimes. It

00:00:15.519 --> 00:00:18.260
really does. It's so easy to miss the links between

00:00:18.260 --> 00:00:21.339
things that seem totally separate. Exactly. So

00:00:21.339 --> 00:00:24.039
welcome, everyone, to this deep dive. We're here

00:00:24.039 --> 00:00:25.800
to try and cut through some of that noise for

00:00:25.800 --> 00:00:29.460
you. Yep. We've got a stack of recent... Pretty

00:00:29.460 --> 00:00:31.859
critical source material and our mission today

00:00:31.859 --> 00:00:34.399
is to pull out the key insights and help make

00:00:34.399 --> 00:00:37.700
sense of this Well this whirlwind that's shaping

00:00:37.700 --> 00:00:39.899
things right now We'll be digging into military

00:00:39.899 --> 00:00:42.259
actions looking at how global alliances might

00:00:42.259 --> 00:00:44.840
be shifting Exploring some really contentious

00:00:44.840 --> 00:00:47.679
laws being debated domestically plus what some

00:00:47.679 --> 00:00:50.079
sources are calling dirty tricks in immigration

00:00:50.079 --> 00:00:54.060
policy and even a surprisingly intense local

00:00:54.060 --> 00:00:55.960
election. We'll try to connect those docs, give

00:00:55.960 --> 00:00:58.840
you some context, maybe find a few aha moments

00:00:58.840 --> 00:01:01.100
along the way. OK, let's dive in. Where should

00:01:01.100 --> 00:01:04.079
we start? Maybe the biggest bang. Yeah, let's

00:01:04.079 --> 00:01:06.340
start with Iran. The news from Sunday morning,

00:01:06.560 --> 00:01:09.400
2 30 a .m. Iran time. Right. The strikes ordered

00:01:09.400 --> 00:01:11.659
by Donald Trump on Iran's uranium enrichment

00:01:11.659 --> 00:01:15.560
facilities, Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. And the

00:01:15.560 --> 00:01:18.230
weapon used. That tells you something right there,

00:01:18.370 --> 00:01:22.950
the GBU -57. The MOP, or MOAB, Mother of All

00:01:22.950 --> 00:01:25.469
Bombs. Exactly, it's a deep penetrator designed

00:01:25.469 --> 00:01:28.049
specifically for targets buried way underground,

00:01:28.569 --> 00:01:30.790
which these sites were. Okay, so maybe a quick

00:01:30.790 --> 00:01:33.329
science refresher. Why these specific sites?

00:01:33.549 --> 00:01:35.909
It's about uranium, right? For a bomb, you need

00:01:35.909 --> 00:01:38.890
uranium -235. It's fissile, meaning it can cause

00:01:38.890 --> 00:01:41.450
a chain reaction. But most natural uranium, like

00:01:41.450 --> 00:01:45.170
over 99%, is U -238, which isn't fissile. Correct.

00:01:45.290 --> 00:01:47.530
So you have to separate the U -235 out. That's

00:01:47.530 --> 00:01:50.090
enrichment. And that process starts where? Isfahan.

00:01:50.189 --> 00:01:52.629
Yep. They take yellow cake uranium ore, convert

00:01:52.629 --> 00:01:55.609
it into uranium hexafluoride gas there. Then

00:01:55.609 --> 00:01:57.890
that gas goes to nitens and fordo. And that's

00:01:57.890 --> 00:02:00.250
where the centrifuges come in. Exactly. Gas centrifuges,

00:02:00.250 --> 00:02:03.689
they spin incredibly fast. Using physics, basically.

00:02:04.049 --> 00:02:07.109
Separating the slightly heavier U -238 from the

00:02:07.109 --> 00:02:10.840
lighter U -235. Precisely. The gas with a bit

00:02:10.840 --> 00:02:14.159
more U -235 goes to the next centrifuge than

00:02:14.159 --> 00:02:18.240
the next. It's a cascade. Hundreds, maybe thousands

00:02:18.240 --> 00:02:21.879
of them. Wow. Until you get up to 90 % pure U

00:02:21.879 --> 00:02:25.740
-235. That's weapons grade. And Natanz also builds

00:02:25.740 --> 00:02:27.520
the centrifuges. It's not just for enrichment.

00:02:27.800 --> 00:02:30.199
And the IAEA director, Grossi, mentioned the

00:02:30.199 --> 00:02:33.419
main site is like half a mile underground. Yeah.

00:02:33.580 --> 00:02:36.050
Very deep. Which is why you need something like

00:02:36.050 --> 00:02:38.789
the MOP. So the big question after something

00:02:38.789 --> 00:02:42.409
like this, did Iran know it was coming? Could

00:02:42.409 --> 00:02:44.389
they have done anything? Well, sources suggest

00:02:44.389 --> 00:02:46.830
they probably suspected something, maybe evacuated

00:02:46.830 --> 00:02:48.909
people. Or even moved the centrifuges. Are they

00:02:48.909 --> 00:02:50.789
moveable? Individually, they're described as

00:02:50.789 --> 00:02:53.289
not that large. So it's possible they moved some

00:02:53.289 --> 00:02:55.569
or hid fissile material they'd already produced.

00:02:55.729 --> 00:02:58.129
Huh. And there's always the shortcut option,

00:02:58.330 --> 00:03:00.530
buying it from someone else. North Korea is the

00:03:00.530 --> 00:03:02.830
name that comes up. Theoretically, yes. OK, so

00:03:02.830 --> 00:03:05.129
after the strikes, Trump gives this speech. Yeah.

00:03:05.330 --> 00:03:07.849
And it was different. Very different. Really

00:03:07.849 --> 00:03:10.349
short. And half of it was thanking people, which

00:03:10.349 --> 00:03:12.669
is, you know, not his usual style. Who did he

00:03:12.669 --> 00:03:15.469
thank? Netanyahu, the Israeli military, the US

00:03:15.469 --> 00:03:18.590
pilots, other US military folks. Dan Raisen came.

00:03:19.669 --> 00:03:22.750
Even God. But not his own secretary of defense.

00:03:23.090 --> 00:03:25.689
Hegseth? Nope. Apparently, Hegseth was not even

00:03:25.689 --> 00:03:28.979
in the loop. Which is remarkable. And Trump warned

00:03:28.979 --> 00:03:33.340
Iran about more bombings on softer targets. He

00:03:33.340 --> 00:03:35.960
did. If they didn't make peace, it's hard not

00:03:35.960 --> 00:03:39.340
to hear echoes of, well, mission accomplished.

00:03:39.520 --> 00:03:41.639
Yeah, the Bush banner in Iraq. And we know how

00:03:41.639 --> 00:03:44.139
that turned out. Eight years, thousands of American

00:03:44.139 --> 00:03:46.840
lives lost. Exactly. It's an uncomfortable parallel.

00:03:47.379 --> 00:03:49.780
So how did the world react? Predictably, it was

00:03:49.780 --> 00:03:52.599
all over the map. The IAEA, they'd already flagged

00:03:52.599 --> 00:03:54.919
Iran for breaching the non -proliferation deal,

00:03:55.280 --> 00:03:57.840
stockpiling uranium. Then you had Hegseth and

00:03:57.840 --> 00:03:59.819
Cain doing this joint press conference, trying

00:03:59.819 --> 00:04:01.479
to send two totally different messages at once.

00:04:01.580 --> 00:04:05.020
How so? One message for Iran, unlimited military

00:04:05.020 --> 00:04:08.180
power, and one for the MAGA base back home. One

00:04:08.180 --> 00:04:11.000
-shot deal, one and done, war over. Trying to

00:04:11.000 --> 00:04:13.139
have it both ways, classic. And then there's

00:04:13.139 --> 00:04:15.240
the potential Iranian response everyone's watching,

00:04:15.620 --> 00:04:17.769
the Strait of Hormuz. All right, that narrow

00:04:17.769 --> 00:04:20.689
choke point for oil shipments only 62 miles wide.

00:04:20.769 --> 00:04:22.990
Yeah, a huge amount of the world's oil goes through

00:04:22.990 --> 00:04:26.290
there. If Iran's Supreme National Security Council

00:04:26.290 --> 00:04:29.170
approves closing it, oil prices would skyrocket

00:04:29.170 --> 00:04:31.790
global inflation. Yeah. Big trouble. Massive

00:04:31.790 --> 00:04:34.670
trouble. Although it would also absolutely wreck

00:04:34.670 --> 00:04:36.970
the Iranian economy, as one source put it. So

00:04:36.970 --> 00:04:39.949
what about other countries? China, Russia, Europe.

00:04:40.089 --> 00:04:43.189
A real mix. China and Russia, the usual calls

00:04:43.189 --> 00:04:45.769
for a ceasefire. European countries stressing,

00:04:45.769 --> 00:04:48.350
you know, Iran shouldn't get nukes. Egypt wants

00:04:48.350 --> 00:04:52.250
talks. Hamas called for jihad. Iraq called it

00:04:52.250 --> 00:04:54.949
a grave threat. Ireland, Italy worried about

00:04:54.949 --> 00:04:58.649
danger. Japan, prevent nukes. Lebanon fears regional

00:04:58.649 --> 00:05:01.750
conflict. Mexico, urgent peace call. Even Pakistan.

00:05:01.980 --> 00:05:03.839
Didn't they just nominate Trump for a Nobel Peace

00:05:03.839 --> 00:05:06.240
Prize? They did. But they called the strikes

00:05:06.240 --> 00:05:09.240
deeply disturbing. Qatar regrets the tension.

00:05:09.459 --> 00:05:11.879
The Vatican finds it alarming. Venezuela calls

00:05:11.879 --> 00:05:14.839
it illegal. The UK back the US, saying the threat

00:05:14.839 --> 00:05:17.819
was alleviated. But Russia and China, basically

00:05:17.819 --> 00:05:20.019
just words. Pretty much, routine condemnations,

00:05:20.120 --> 00:05:22.279
nothing concrete. Which kind of leaves the US

00:05:22.279 --> 00:05:24.500
and Iran staring each other down. So we're left

00:05:24.500 --> 00:05:28.360
with huge questions, more bombings, Iranian retaliation,

00:05:28.579 --> 00:05:31.079
killing Americans, taking hostages. How does

00:05:31.079 --> 00:05:33.720
Trump react then? And the biggest military question,

00:05:34.079 --> 00:05:36.819
did the bombs actually get the centrifuges? Were

00:05:36.819 --> 00:05:39.160
they too deep? Were they moved? Because if they

00:05:39.160 --> 00:05:42.360
did, Trump claims a win. If not, he could look

00:05:42.360 --> 00:05:45.120
like a fool, as the source bluntly puts it. And

00:05:45.120 --> 00:05:47.500
back home. How's this playing out politically?

00:05:48.100 --> 00:05:50.379
Well, Democrats like Senator Mark Warner are

00:05:50.379 --> 00:05:53.319
raising serious concerns. Acting without Congress,

00:05:53.519 --> 00:05:56.120
without a clear strategy, ignoring intelligence.

00:05:56.379 --> 00:05:58.060
Constitutional point, right? Right. Congress

00:05:58.060 --> 00:06:00.379
declares war, not the president. That's the core

00:06:00.379 --> 00:06:03.399
argument. Congress has the exclusive power to

00:06:03.399 --> 00:06:06.319
declare war. But Republicans. Leadership, at

00:06:06.319 --> 00:06:09.139
least. Quick to praise Trump. Speaker Mike Johnson

00:06:09.139 --> 00:06:12.000
saying Trump means what he says. Even though,

00:06:12.139 --> 00:06:14.240
as the source notes, Trump promised two weeks

00:06:14.240 --> 00:06:16.800
for talks and then attacked the next day. Right.

00:06:16.959 --> 00:06:18.980
But not all Republicans are on board. You've

00:06:18.980 --> 00:06:21.139
got Marjorie Taylor Greene saying, it's not our

00:06:21.139 --> 00:06:24.160
fight. Israel has nukes. And Thomas Massie. Just

00:06:24.160 --> 00:06:26.800
flat out. This is not constitutional. So there's

00:06:26.800 --> 00:06:28.759
this interesting domestic angle, too, right?

00:06:29.319 --> 00:06:31.720
About emergency powers. Yeah, that's a really

00:06:31.720 --> 00:06:34.160
crucial point. Some of Trump's domestic actions

00:06:34.160 --> 00:06:36.879
rely on laws giving presidents extra power during

00:06:36.879 --> 00:06:40.079
wartime. So a declared war. or even this kind

00:06:40.079 --> 00:06:42.740
of conflict, might give him a stronger legal

00:06:42.740 --> 00:06:45.379
footing for those actions. Potentially. It could

00:06:45.379 --> 00:06:48.959
provide a more solid legal basis. Although, as

00:06:48.959 --> 00:06:51.939
the source Riley notes, things like deporting

00:06:51.939 --> 00:06:54.420
Mexicans to El Salvador probably aren't what

00:06:54.420 --> 00:06:56.860
Congress had in mind when writing those laws.

00:06:56.959 --> 00:06:59.040
It really throws the whole balance of power question

00:06:59.040 --> 00:07:01.660
into sharp relief, doesn't it? Absolutely. Especially

00:07:01.660 --> 00:07:04.439
in a crisis. Okay, let's shift gears a bit. From

00:07:04.439 --> 00:07:08.339
open conflict to maybe tense diplomacy. NATO.

00:07:08.459 --> 00:07:10.899
Right. The NATO leaders meeting in The Hague.

00:07:11.720 --> 00:07:14.180
A really critical gathering. The big underlying

00:07:14.180 --> 00:07:16.339
tension seems to be Trump's attitude towards

00:07:16.339 --> 00:07:19.220
NATO itself. Will he try to pull the U .S. out?

00:07:19.259 --> 00:07:21.920
That's the fear. Preventing Trump from, as one

00:07:21.920 --> 00:07:24.560
source puts it, destroying an entity that has

00:07:24.560 --> 00:07:26.600
kept the peace in Europe for three quarters of

00:07:26.600 --> 00:07:29.959
a century since 1949, basically formed to deter

00:07:29.959 --> 00:07:32.399
Russia. And the NATO secretary general, Mark

00:07:32.399 --> 00:07:35.100
Rote, seems to be playing a careful game here.

00:07:35.240 --> 00:07:38.279
Very shrewd, it seems. He knows Trump loves getting

00:07:38.279 --> 00:07:41.319
wins. So, Root's pushing members to spend more

00:07:41.319 --> 00:07:44.279
on defense. A lot more. The target being floated

00:07:44.279 --> 00:07:47.879
is 3 .5 % of GDP on direct military spending,

00:07:48.139 --> 00:07:51.220
plus another 1 .5 % indirectly for infrastructure.

00:07:51.439 --> 00:07:54.139
And the idea is to present this to Trump as his

00:07:54.139 --> 00:07:56.899
victory, his genius making it happen. Pretty

00:07:56.899 --> 00:07:59.319
much, because apparently baseless flattery is

00:07:59.319 --> 00:08:01.639
more important with Trump than a dozen F -35

00:08:01.639 --> 00:08:04.720
fighter jets. That's a direct quote. Wow. But

00:08:04.720 --> 00:08:07.139
hang on, if Europe ramps up defense spending

00:08:07.139 --> 00:08:09.959
massively, what does that actually mean long

00:08:09.959 --> 00:08:12.769
term? Is that good for the U .S.? Well, that's

00:08:12.769 --> 00:08:14.769
the fascinating part. European leaders seem to

00:08:14.769 --> 00:08:17.310
get this, but maybe Trump doesn't see the downside

00:08:17.310 --> 00:08:20.250
for the U .S. Which is? A major European rearmament

00:08:20.250 --> 00:08:23.629
gives the EU much more sway in NATO that U .S.

00:08:23.730 --> 00:08:25.949
might not be able to call the shots so easily.

00:08:26.329 --> 00:08:28.689
Europe could become its own military power, independent

00:08:28.689 --> 00:08:31.029
of the U .S. Exactly, which long -term is not

00:08:31.029 --> 00:08:32.750
necessarily in the best interests of the U .S.

00:08:32.750 --> 00:08:35.529
It changes the whole global power balance. And

00:08:35.529 --> 00:08:38.629
there are economic consequences, too, for American

00:08:38.629 --> 00:08:41.080
companies. For sure. If European countries spend

00:08:41.080 --> 00:08:43.220
more on defense but don't raise taxes, they'll

00:08:43.220 --> 00:08:46.080
likely cut social programs. But crucially, those

00:08:46.080 --> 00:08:49.139
defense contracts. They'll go to European companies.

00:08:49.379 --> 00:08:51.840
Like German tanks, British ships. German Leopard

00:08:51.840 --> 00:08:55.600
tanks, British BAE shipbuilding, parts for the

00:08:55.600 --> 00:08:58.519
Eurofighter Typhoon made across Europe. Yeah.

00:08:58.779 --> 00:09:01.080
Meaning fewer contracts for U .S. giants like

00:09:01.080 --> 00:09:04.220
Lockheed Martin, RTX. Potentially, yes. Which

00:09:04.220 --> 00:09:08.179
could cost jobs in the U .S. So what looks like

00:09:08.179 --> 00:09:10.740
a win for Trump on spending numbers could actually

00:09:10.740 --> 00:09:13.179
weaken U .S. influence and hurt the U .S. economy

00:09:13.179 --> 00:09:16.059
down the road. That's quite a twist. Okay, connecting

00:09:16.059 --> 00:09:18.460
this back to the U .S. domestic scene, specifically

00:09:18.460 --> 00:09:21.299
intelligence, Trump appointed Tulsi Gabbard as

00:09:21.299 --> 00:09:23.840
director of national intelligence DNI. Right.

00:09:24.179 --> 00:09:26.480
And her views on foreign policy. Well, sources

00:09:26.480 --> 00:09:29.200
say they mirror Vladimir Putin's. Leading some

00:09:29.200 --> 00:09:32.029
to call her things like a useful idiot. or even

00:09:32.029 --> 00:09:34.169
a Russian asset. Those terms are being used,

00:09:34.309 --> 00:09:36.549
yes. And it's already causing friction within

00:09:36.549 --> 00:09:39.870
the administration. Trump has publicly shot down

00:09:39.870 --> 00:09:43.470
her assessments on Iran's nuclear program twice.

00:09:43.789 --> 00:09:46.190
Just said, she's wrong. I don't care what she

00:09:46.190 --> 00:09:49.929
says. Publicly. Yeah. And he was apparently furious

00:09:49.929 --> 00:09:52.909
about a video she put out blaming political elite

00:09:52.909 --> 00:09:56.450
and warmongers for the Iran conflict. He saw

00:09:56.450 --> 00:09:59.309
it as a straightforward Russian talking point.

00:10:00.320 --> 00:10:02.820
basically saw her as blaming him for the war.

00:10:03.080 --> 00:10:05.440
But he didn't fire her. Even after telling her

00:10:05.440 --> 00:10:07.519
she was just using the job to run for something

00:10:07.519 --> 00:10:10.340
else. Nope. Still there. Which is odd because

00:10:10.340 --> 00:10:13.000
sources say he prefers talking to the CIA director,

00:10:13.159 --> 00:10:15.460
John Ratcliffe, who was DNI before. Implying

00:10:15.460 --> 00:10:17.460
he doesn't trust Gabbard's judgment or loyalty.

00:10:17.740 --> 00:10:20.419
Seems that way. The source even jokes that Bozo

00:10:20.419 --> 00:10:23.080
the Clown would be an upgrade. It really highlights

00:10:23.080 --> 00:10:25.659
the tension when political picks clash with national

00:10:25.659 --> 00:10:28.070
security needs. OK, let's bring it fully home

00:10:28.070 --> 00:10:31.210
now. Domestic issues. Yeah. That one big, beautiful

00:10:31.210 --> 00:10:34.629
bill from Speaker Mike Johnson. Is it still happening?

00:10:34.830 --> 00:10:36.610
Well, the deadlines keep slipping, don't they?

00:10:36.750 --> 00:10:39.850
First July 4th, then Labor Day, Halloween, Veterans

00:10:39.850 --> 00:10:43.669
Day. Now maybe Christmas. It seems less and less

00:10:43.669 --> 00:10:45.950
likely. What's the latest holdup? A big one seems

00:10:45.950 --> 00:10:49.049
to be Medicaid, a provision limiting reimbursement

00:10:49.049 --> 00:10:52.350
rates to states. And the CBO, the Congressional

00:10:52.350 --> 00:10:54.669
Budget Office? What do they say about that? Their

00:10:54.669 --> 00:10:58.070
projection is stark. A $1 trillion cut from government

00:10:58.070 --> 00:11:00.190
health care payments, Medicaid, and the Affordable

00:11:00.190 --> 00:11:03.629
Care Act combined. Leading to? 11 million people

00:11:03.629 --> 00:11:06.470
potentially losing health coverage and higher

00:11:06.470 --> 00:11:08.590
out -of -pocket costs for millions of others.

00:11:08.769 --> 00:11:12.049
And who gets hit hardest? Rural areas, disproportionately.

00:11:12.769 --> 00:11:15.809
Rural hospitals depend heavily on Medicaid. So

00:11:15.809 --> 00:11:18.789
these cuts could force them to shut down services

00:11:18.789 --> 00:11:22.440
like maternity care or close entirely. That's

00:11:22.440 --> 00:11:24.440
the fear. And the source makes a grim point.

00:11:24.779 --> 00:11:26.740
If you have a heart attack and nearest hospital

00:11:26.740 --> 00:11:29.679
is 100 miles away and it is snowing, well, good

00:11:29.679 --> 00:11:31.659
luck. And politically, this hurts Republicans,

00:11:31.899 --> 00:11:33.799
too, right? In those rural areas. Absolutely.

00:11:34.080 --> 00:11:36.299
Sources say as many Republicans as Democrats

00:11:36.299 --> 00:11:38.840
will be hurt. Trump's own pollster apparently

00:11:38.840 --> 00:11:41.100
advised against these cuts. But the bill just

00:11:41.100 --> 00:11:43.679
keeps rolling along. Why? Seems driven by the

00:11:43.679 --> 00:11:46.179
need to find savings to offset massive tax cuts

00:11:46.179 --> 00:11:48.200
elsewhere in the bill, mostly benefiting the

00:11:48.200 --> 00:11:49.690
wealthy. And there are other parts of the bill

00:11:49.690 --> 00:11:51.230
getting blocked, too, aren't there, by Senate

00:11:51.230 --> 00:11:53.289
rules? Yeah, the Parliamentarian, McDonough,

00:11:53.350 --> 00:11:55.529
and the Byrd rule. It basically says you can

00:11:55.529 --> 00:11:58.210
only include budget -related items in this kind

00:11:58.210 --> 00:12:01.049
of fast -track reconciliation bill. So things

00:12:01.049 --> 00:12:02.950
like killing the Consumer Financial Protection

00:12:02.950 --> 00:12:06.509
Bureau, the CFPB. Ruled out. Same for slashing

00:12:06.509 --> 00:12:09.149
Fed employees' salaries or shifting food stamp

00:12:09.149 --> 00:12:12.649
cost SNAP onto the states. Those who need a regular

00:12:12.649 --> 00:12:15.860
bill face a filibuster much harder. It shows

00:12:15.860 --> 00:12:17.779
the limits of just trying to force things through,

00:12:17.960 --> 00:12:20.000
I guess. Definitely. Procedural rules matter.

00:12:20.440 --> 00:12:23.919
OK, from legislative hurdles to, well, something

00:12:23.919 --> 00:12:26.580
quite different. Immigration. There's talk of

00:12:26.580 --> 00:12:29.980
dirty tricks by ICE. Yeah, this came into focus

00:12:29.980 --> 00:12:33.139
with the arrest of Brad Lander, the NYC controller

00:12:33.139 --> 00:12:35.000
who's running for mayor. What's the tactic? It's

00:12:35.000 --> 00:12:37.120
being called a bait and switch. It targets asylum

00:12:37.120 --> 00:12:39.340
seekers who actually followed the rules, presented

00:12:39.340 --> 00:12:41.500
themselves at the border, you know, did it the

00:12:41.500 --> 00:12:45.190
right way. So what's the switch? ICI moves to

00:12:45.190 --> 00:12:48.529
dismiss their pending immigration cases. Which

00:12:48.529 --> 00:12:50.529
sounds good, right? Like they're free. But it's

00:12:50.529 --> 00:12:53.110
a trick. Dismissing the case takes them out of

00:12:53.110 --> 00:12:55.929
the normal system and puts them into expedited

00:12:55.929 --> 00:12:59.750
removal, or ER. That's amazing. Fast -track deportation

00:12:59.750 --> 00:13:02.950
with very few rights. The source says the sole

00:13:02.950 --> 00:13:05.809
purpose is eliminating their rights so ICI can

00:13:05.809 --> 00:13:09.620
immediately pick them up. Wow. That's... Cynical?

00:13:10.000 --> 00:13:12.980
Is this widespread? It seems driven by quotas.

00:13:13.340 --> 00:13:17.500
Trump apparently ordered ICE to make 3 ,000 arrests

00:13:17.500 --> 00:13:20.340
per day. So officers are just grabbing people,

00:13:20.519 --> 00:13:22.919
not worrying too much about who? Sources say

00:13:22.919 --> 00:13:26.259
morale at ICE and CBP is at an all -time low

00:13:26.259 --> 00:13:28.860
and officers are under pressure, sometimes sweeping

00:13:28.860 --> 00:13:31.620
up actual U .S. citizens by mistake. Who came

00:13:31.620 --> 00:13:33.960
up with this tactic? Benjamin Huffman, when he

00:13:33.960 --> 00:13:37.039
was acting DHS secretary, non -profits are challenging

00:13:37.039 --> 00:13:39.299
it in court now. Is there anything people caught

00:13:39.299 --> 00:13:42.320
in this can do? Actually, yes. There's a bit

00:13:42.320 --> 00:13:44.779
of good news. Some USC students and the Agents

00:13:44.779 --> 00:13:47.159
of Change Civil Rights Advocacy Initiative set

00:13:47.159 --> 00:13:49.580
up a hotline. What does it do? It helps people

00:13:49.580 --> 00:13:51.700
request online immigration hearings instead of

00:13:51.700 --> 00:13:53.340
having to go to the courthouse, where they risk

00:13:53.340 --> 00:13:55.740
being detained by ICE right there. That's clever.

00:13:56.039 --> 00:13:58.580
A practical workaround. Yeah, thousands of calls

00:13:58.580 --> 00:14:00.679
already, helping people in English and Spanish.

00:14:00.799 --> 00:14:03.159
It really shows that ingenuity in the face of

00:14:03.159 --> 00:14:05.980
these big systemic issues. OK, one last stop

00:14:05.980 --> 00:14:09.779
on our tour today. New York City. The Democratic

00:14:09.779 --> 00:14:11.919
primary for mayor sounds like quite the drama.

00:14:11.980 --> 00:14:14.759
Oh, it's a melee. And ranked choice voting makes

00:14:14.759 --> 00:14:16.860
it even wilder. How does that work again? You

00:14:16.860 --> 00:14:19.210
rank candidates in order of preference. If no

00:14:19.210 --> 00:14:22.549
one gets over 50 % first -choice votes, the candidate

00:14:22.549 --> 00:14:25.350
with the fewest votes is eliminated, and their

00:14:25.350 --> 00:14:28.129
voters' second choices get redistributed. This

00:14:28.129 --> 00:14:30.889
continues until someone hits 50%. So second and

00:14:30.889 --> 00:14:33.049
third choices really matter. Who are the main

00:14:33.049 --> 00:14:35.669
players in this race? It's quite a cast. You've

00:14:35.669 --> 00:14:38.409
got Andrew Cuomo, the former governor, trying

00:14:38.409 --> 00:14:40.789
a comeback after the harassment scandals. That's

00:14:40.789 --> 00:14:44.090
him, pitching himself as the mean SOB who can

00:14:44.090 --> 00:14:46.190
run the city and stand up to Trump. What a slogan.

00:14:46.350 --> 00:14:49.490
And who else? Then there's Zoran Mamdani, young

00:14:49.490 --> 00:14:53.429
guy, 33 state assemblyman, very left -wing, Palestinian

00:14:53.429 --> 00:14:56.470
activist. No executive experience, though. None.

00:14:57.250 --> 00:15:00.269
Wants higher taxes on the rich, affordable housing.

00:15:00.990 --> 00:15:03.450
But facing pushback from some Jewish groups over

00:15:03.450 --> 00:15:06.309
comments blaming Israel for the October 8th Hamas

00:15:06.309 --> 00:15:09.570
attack. And his take on Cuomo. Simple. Cuomo

00:15:09.570 --> 00:15:13.929
is an a -hole. OK. Yeah. Anyone less? Confrontational.

00:15:14.149 --> 00:15:16.230
Well, there's Brad Lander, the current controller

00:15:16.230 --> 00:15:19.850
we mentioned earlier, seen as a pragmatic progressive,

00:15:19.970 --> 00:15:22.529
good with numbers, kind of the dad Lander figure.

00:15:22.629 --> 00:15:25.549
Got it. And Adrienne Adams. City council speaker.

00:15:25.990 --> 00:15:28.429
Emphasizing her experience, budget knowledge,

00:15:28.889 --> 00:15:31.700
could be the first female mayor. Any others worth

00:15:31.700 --> 00:15:34.039
noting? Scott Stringer, another former controller,

00:15:34.259 --> 00:15:36.940
also had past misconduct allegations. And Whitney

00:15:36.940 --> 00:15:38.980
Tilson, a hedge fund guy, focused on charter

00:15:38.980 --> 00:15:41.019
schools. So it seems like there's a real generational

00:15:41.019 --> 00:15:43.440
split here, too. Definitely. You see that dynamic

00:15:43.440 --> 00:15:45.919
of a youthful insurgent powered by young voters

00:15:45.919 --> 00:15:48.480
against a grizzled veteran, possibly with some

00:15:48.480 --> 00:15:50.659
baggage. And the source suggests this pattern

00:15:50.659 --> 00:15:52.500
might repeat itself elsewhere in the Democratic

00:15:52.500 --> 00:15:55.879
Party. Yeah, likely to play out many times in

00:15:55.879 --> 00:15:57.710
the years ahead. It also raises that question

00:15:57.710 --> 00:16:00.850
about experience, right? Executive versus legislative.

00:16:01.389 --> 00:16:04.549
Exactly. The source contrasts someone like AOC,

00:16:05.029 --> 00:16:07.889
great speeches, knows how to vote, legislative,

00:16:08.389 --> 00:16:10.769
with being a mayor or governor, making tough

00:16:10.769 --> 00:16:13.950
calls on money every single day, executive. So

00:16:13.950 --> 00:16:16.210
the argument is maybe different skill sets are

00:16:16.210 --> 00:16:18.669
needed. Yeah. The source muses that in the best

00:16:18.669 --> 00:16:21.570
of all possible worlds, Democrats might pick

00:16:21.690 --> 00:16:24.690
Grizzled veterans for executive positions and

00:16:24.690 --> 00:16:27.190
inspirational young people for legislative ones.

00:16:27.429 --> 00:16:29.509
It makes you think, doesn't it? Does being a

00:16:29.509 --> 00:16:31.370
great legislator prepare you for running the

00:16:31.370 --> 00:16:33.779
show? Okay, wow. We've covered a lot of ground

00:16:33.779 --> 00:16:37.039
today. We really have. From Iran and NATO on

00:16:37.039 --> 00:16:39.460
the world stage. To healthcare battles and immigration

00:16:39.460 --> 00:16:41.539
tactics right here at home. And then zooming

00:16:41.539 --> 00:16:44.419
into the political microcosm of the NYC mayor's

00:16:44.419 --> 00:16:46.480
race. The thing that really stands out, I think,

00:16:46.879 --> 00:16:49.220
is how interconnected it all feels. Absolutely.

00:16:49.340 --> 00:16:51.320
None of these things happen in a vacuum. Power

00:16:51.320 --> 00:16:54.399
dynamics, public opinion, domestic needs versus

00:16:54.399 --> 00:16:57.259
global pressures. It's all woven together. A

00:16:57.259 --> 00:17:00.059
drone strike in Iran can echo in a NATO meeting.

00:17:00.169 --> 00:17:02.429
which can influence domestic spending debates,

00:17:02.970 --> 00:17:05.009
which connect to local elections. That's complex.

00:17:05.309 --> 00:17:08.309
And maybe the key takeaway is just that, needing

00:17:08.309 --> 00:17:11.049
to look beyond the single headline to see those

00:17:11.049 --> 00:17:13.910
connections, those deeper ripples. So maybe a

00:17:13.910 --> 00:17:16.130
final thought for you listening in. We've talked

00:17:16.130 --> 00:17:18.529
a lot about challenges today, challenges to old

00:17:18.529 --> 00:17:21.250
alliances, to legal norms, to political leadership

00:17:21.250 --> 00:17:22.869
styles. Yeah, things feel like they're shifting

00:17:22.869 --> 00:17:26.240
fast. So the question to ponder might be. How

00:17:26.240 --> 00:17:29.140
do all these rapid shifts redefine what stability

00:17:29.140 --> 00:17:31.740
even means in the years ahead? And what's your

00:17:31.740 --> 00:17:35.000
role, our role, in just navigating that change?

00:17:35.500 --> 00:17:37.420
Maybe simply staying informed, staying engaged

00:17:37.420 --> 00:17:37.980
as part of it?
