1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:01,760 Welcome to your deep dive. 2 00:00:01,760 --> 00:00:06,760 Today we're gonna be focusing on a single source, 3 00:00:06,880 --> 00:00:08,760 a recent update from Electoralvot.com 4 00:00:08,760 --> 00:00:12,120 to kind of break down the first week of Trump's second term. 5 00:00:12,120 --> 00:00:13,560 Okay, sounds good. 6 00:00:13,560 --> 00:00:17,320 So think of this as like a behind the scenes look 7 00:00:17,320 --> 00:00:19,880 at how things are playing out of Washington. 8 00:00:19,880 --> 00:00:21,440 We'll unpack the major events 9 00:00:21,440 --> 00:00:24,360 and see what they might mean for the future. 10 00:00:24,360 --> 00:00:26,440 Are you ready to dive into this wild week? 11 00:00:26,440 --> 00:00:27,400 Absolutely. 12 00:00:27,400 --> 00:00:29,640 You know, it's really interesting to compare the start 13 00:00:29,640 --> 00:00:30,920 to his first term. 14 00:00:30,920 --> 00:00:33,960 I mean, there's some like striking similarities, 15 00:00:33,960 --> 00:00:36,080 but also, you know, some intriguing differences 16 00:00:36,080 --> 00:00:38,480 that could shape the next four years for sure. 17 00:00:38,480 --> 00:00:39,720 Yeah, right off the bat, 18 00:00:39,720 --> 00:00:42,360 the article highlights a few early stumbles 19 00:00:42,360 --> 00:00:43,480 for the administration. 20 00:00:43,480 --> 00:00:46,760 It seems Trump's second term is starting off 21 00:00:46,760 --> 00:00:48,960 with a familiar pattern. 22 00:00:48,960 --> 00:00:51,760 Executive orders hitting legal roadblocks. 23 00:00:51,760 --> 00:00:52,800 What's your take on that? 24 00:00:52,800 --> 00:00:54,920 Well, you know, take the birthright 25 00:00:54,920 --> 00:00:56,920 citizenship executive order. 26 00:00:56,920 --> 00:00:59,880 A judge appointed by Reagan blocked it like within days, 27 00:00:59,880 --> 00:01:03,760 calling it blatantly unconstitutional. 28 00:01:03,760 --> 00:01:06,400 This swift action coming from, you know, 29 00:01:06,400 --> 00:01:08,880 a conservative judge really suggests 30 00:01:08,880 --> 00:01:12,280 that the courts might be more willing to push back 31 00:01:12,280 --> 00:01:14,560 against what they perceive as overreach 32 00:01:14,560 --> 00:01:17,440 by the executive branch, you know, this time around. 33 00:01:17,440 --> 00:01:18,880 That's a really interesting point. 34 00:01:18,880 --> 00:01:21,080 It makes you wonder if this could embolden 35 00:01:21,080 --> 00:01:23,880 other legal challenges to Trump's policies. 36 00:01:23,880 --> 00:01:26,640 Especially, you know, given that the article highlights, 37 00:01:26,640 --> 00:01:29,080 this is just one of many legal batters brewing. 38 00:01:29,080 --> 00:01:30,120 Oh, absolutely. 39 00:01:30,120 --> 00:01:34,800 This early ruling could signal a more assertive judiciary, 40 00:01:34,800 --> 00:01:37,880 which could have a ripple effect on Trump's agenda 41 00:01:37,880 --> 00:01:40,840 and his ability to actually enact his policies. 42 00:01:40,840 --> 00:01:42,360 Definitely something to watch closely. 43 00:01:42,360 --> 00:01:44,080 Okay, so we've got potential legal roadblocks 44 00:01:44,080 --> 00:01:47,640 on the horizon, but what about within Trump's own party? 45 00:01:47,640 --> 00:01:48,480 Yeah. 46 00:01:48,480 --> 00:01:50,760 The article also delves into some drama 47 00:01:50,760 --> 00:01:52,800 surrounding Pete Hagueseff. 48 00:01:52,800 --> 00:01:53,640 Right. 49 00:01:53,640 --> 00:01:55,960 Trump's pick for defense secretary. 50 00:01:55,960 --> 00:01:56,800 Yes. 51 00:01:56,800 --> 00:01:58,200 Hagueseff, you know, his nomination 52 00:01:58,200 --> 00:02:00,200 has been a lightning rod for controversy. 53 00:02:00,200 --> 00:02:03,960 Even with a Republican majority in the Senate, 54 00:02:03,960 --> 00:02:06,360 his confirmation wasn't a smooth ride. 55 00:02:06,360 --> 00:02:07,200 Yeah. 56 00:02:07,200 --> 00:02:09,680 Two Republican senators actually broke ranks 57 00:02:09,680 --> 00:02:11,240 and voted against him. 58 00:02:11,240 --> 00:02:12,960 Pretty rare display of dissent. 59 00:02:12,960 --> 00:02:13,800 Wow. 60 00:02:13,800 --> 00:02:14,640 Within the party. 61 00:02:14,640 --> 00:02:16,080 Do you think those dissenting votes 62 00:02:16,080 --> 00:02:18,840 are a sign of things to come, we see? 63 00:02:18,840 --> 00:02:20,680 I think it's certainly possible. 64 00:02:20,680 --> 00:02:21,520 Yeah. 65 00:02:21,520 --> 00:02:23,960 Remember Hagueseff faced accusations 66 00:02:23,960 --> 00:02:26,960 of sexual misconduct and a $50,000 settlement. 67 00:02:26,960 --> 00:02:27,800 Right. 68 00:02:27,800 --> 00:02:29,320 Which all surfaced during the confirmation process. 69 00:02:29,320 --> 00:02:31,640 This, you know, this highlights the potential 70 00:02:31,640 --> 00:02:35,880 for damaging information to really derail nominations, 71 00:02:35,880 --> 00:02:38,440 even when the nominee is aligned with, you know, 72 00:02:38,440 --> 00:02:39,960 the president's party. 73 00:02:39,960 --> 00:02:40,920 And that kind of makes you think 74 00:02:40,920 --> 00:02:42,800 about Tulsi Gavrard's nomination. 75 00:02:42,800 --> 00:02:43,640 Yeah. 76 00:02:43,640 --> 00:02:45,440 For director of national intelligence, 77 00:02:45,440 --> 00:02:48,520 which the article claims is looking pretty shaky. 78 00:02:48,520 --> 00:02:49,360 Right. 79 00:02:49,360 --> 00:02:50,200 Yeah. 80 00:02:50,200 --> 00:02:51,040 Even some Republicans are hesitant 81 00:02:51,040 --> 00:02:53,000 because of her past support for Edward Snowden. 82 00:02:53,000 --> 00:02:53,840 Yeah. 83 00:02:53,840 --> 00:02:54,880 And she has all sorts of questions 84 00:02:54,880 --> 00:02:56,560 about her stance on national security. 85 00:02:56,560 --> 00:02:57,400 Yeah. 86 00:02:57,400 --> 00:02:59,160 Gavrard's nomination is especially fascinating. 87 00:02:59,160 --> 00:03:00,000 Yeah. 88 00:03:00,000 --> 00:03:01,080 I mean, this is a crucial position. 89 00:03:01,080 --> 00:03:03,240 One that demands a deep understanding 90 00:03:03,240 --> 00:03:05,400 of the complexities of intelligence gathering 91 00:03:05,400 --> 00:03:06,560 and analysis. 92 00:03:06,560 --> 00:03:10,040 Her nomination, I think, will force the Senate 93 00:03:10,040 --> 00:03:13,360 to grapple with questions about national security. 94 00:03:13,360 --> 00:03:14,200 Right. 95 00:03:14,200 --> 00:03:16,080 Potential foreign influence and, you know, 96 00:03:16,080 --> 00:03:18,320 the limits of dissent within the intelligence community. 97 00:03:18,320 --> 00:03:22,400 You can bet this will be a closely watched confirmation battle. 98 00:03:22,400 --> 00:03:24,200 So far, it sounds like internal struggles 99 00:03:24,200 --> 00:03:26,880 and political maneuvering might be defining features 100 00:03:26,880 --> 00:03:27,800 of this second term. 101 00:03:27,800 --> 00:03:28,120 Yeah. 102 00:03:28,120 --> 00:03:30,200 But here's a curveball. 103 00:03:30,200 --> 00:03:32,760 The article mentions a surprising rift 104 00:03:32,760 --> 00:03:35,080 between Trump and Elon Musk. 105 00:03:35,080 --> 00:03:36,240 Oh, wow. 106 00:03:36,240 --> 00:03:39,600 Apparently Musk publicly criticized Trump's investment 107 00:03:39,600 --> 00:03:40,480 in AI. 108 00:03:40,480 --> 00:03:41,000 Really? 109 00:03:41,000 --> 00:03:43,120 Which did not go over well. 110 00:03:43,120 --> 00:03:44,400 I didn't hear about that. 111 00:03:44,400 --> 00:03:44,920 Yeah. 112 00:03:44,920 --> 00:03:45,520 Yeah. 113 00:03:45,520 --> 00:03:47,160 So this clash is intriguing because it 114 00:03:47,160 --> 00:03:51,520 exposes potential fault lines in the often-assumed alliance 115 00:03:51,520 --> 00:03:53,000 between Trump and the tech industry. 116 00:03:53,000 --> 00:03:53,440 Yeah. 117 00:03:53,440 --> 00:03:57,120 Musk, as like a vocal and influential figure 118 00:03:57,120 --> 00:04:00,640 in Silicon Valley, represents a sector that often clashes 119 00:04:00,640 --> 00:04:04,280 with Trump's policies on issues like immigration 120 00:04:04,280 --> 00:04:06,680 and climate change. 121 00:04:06,680 --> 00:04:10,040 It makes you wonder if this public disagreement could 122 00:04:10,040 --> 00:04:13,560 escalate into a larger conflict between the administration 123 00:04:13,560 --> 00:04:16,760 and the tech world, especially since Musk isn't exactly known 124 00:04:16,760 --> 00:04:18,080 for backing down from a fight. 125 00:04:18,080 --> 00:04:19,160 Right. 126 00:04:19,160 --> 00:04:20,600 Do you think this will blow over? 127 00:04:20,600 --> 00:04:23,520 Or could this be the start of a bigger rift? 128 00:04:23,520 --> 00:04:25,920 Well, it's too early to say for sure. 129 00:04:25,920 --> 00:04:28,360 But this incident definitely highlights 130 00:04:28,360 --> 00:04:32,560 the potential for friction between these two powerful forces, 131 00:04:32,560 --> 00:04:35,400 the Trump administration and the tech industry. 132 00:04:35,400 --> 00:04:35,720 Right. 133 00:04:35,720 --> 00:04:38,200 It's a relationship that could have a significant impact 134 00:04:38,200 --> 00:04:40,760 on the direction of the country. 135 00:04:40,760 --> 00:04:44,680 And speaking of potentially explosive situations, 136 00:04:44,680 --> 00:04:46,480 let's not forget about health care. 137 00:04:46,480 --> 00:04:50,520 Remember, Trump's campaign promised to dismantle Obamacare. 138 00:04:50,520 --> 00:04:51,680 Oh, yeah. 139 00:04:51,680 --> 00:04:52,080 Right? 140 00:04:52,080 --> 00:04:54,360 Well, according to the article, that might be easier said 141 00:04:54,360 --> 00:04:54,800 than done. 142 00:04:54,800 --> 00:04:55,560 Yeah. 143 00:04:55,560 --> 00:04:55,800 Right. 144 00:04:55,800 --> 00:04:58,520 The article explains how a group of House Republicans 145 00:04:58,520 --> 00:05:02,080 are refusing to cut social programs, 146 00:05:02,080 --> 00:05:05,800 effectively stalling any attempts to gut Obamacare. 147 00:05:05,800 --> 00:05:06,720 Interesting. 148 00:05:06,720 --> 00:05:09,200 This reveals the internal divisions 149 00:05:09,200 --> 00:05:12,160 within the Republican Party and the limits of Trump's power, 150 00:05:12,160 --> 00:05:14,000 even with a majority in the House. 151 00:05:14,000 --> 00:05:15,000 That's a great point. 152 00:05:15,000 --> 00:05:15,240 Yeah. 153 00:05:15,240 --> 00:05:18,960 This is a perfect example of how political realities can often 154 00:05:18,960 --> 00:05:21,840 clash with those campaign promises. 155 00:05:21,840 --> 00:05:22,160 Right. 156 00:05:22,160 --> 00:05:23,960 And it raises some important questions. 157 00:05:23,960 --> 00:05:26,840 What will this resistance mean for the future of health care 158 00:05:26,840 --> 00:05:27,640 in America? 159 00:05:27,640 --> 00:05:28,120 Yeah. 160 00:05:28,120 --> 00:05:32,200 Could this stalemate lead to a more bipartisan approach 161 00:05:32,200 --> 00:05:33,960 to health care reform? 162 00:05:33,960 --> 00:05:34,360 Right. 163 00:05:34,360 --> 00:05:36,960 Or will it further entrench the existing divides? 164 00:05:36,960 --> 00:05:38,200 These are big questions. 165 00:05:38,200 --> 00:05:39,960 These are definitely questions worth considering. 166 00:05:39,960 --> 00:05:40,240 Yeah. 167 00:05:40,240 --> 00:05:42,760 The future of health care is deeply intertwined 168 00:05:42,760 --> 00:05:44,560 with the political landscape. 169 00:05:44,560 --> 00:05:47,200 And this early resistance to cuts 170 00:05:47,200 --> 00:05:51,160 suggests we're in for a complex and potentially contentious 171 00:05:51,160 --> 00:05:52,760 debate over the next four years. 172 00:05:52,760 --> 00:05:53,480 For sure. 173 00:05:53,480 --> 00:05:54,000 OK. 174 00:05:54,000 --> 00:05:57,080 So we've got legal battles, confirmation drama, 175 00:05:57,080 --> 00:06:01,160 a tech titan feud, and the persistence of Obamacare. 176 00:06:01,160 --> 00:06:03,560 But the article claims the biggest headache for Trump 177 00:06:03,560 --> 00:06:06,680 this week might be the backlash over his January 6th 178 00:06:06,680 --> 00:06:08,160 pardons. 179 00:06:08,160 --> 00:06:08,720 Right. 180 00:06:08,720 --> 00:06:09,800 What's your take on that? 181 00:06:09,800 --> 00:06:14,040 Well, the pardons are significant, not just legally, 182 00:06:14,040 --> 00:06:15,840 but also politically. 183 00:06:15,840 --> 00:06:19,000 Pardoning individuals convicted of violent crimes, 184 00:06:19,000 --> 00:06:21,880 especially those tied to an attack on the Capitol, 185 00:06:21,880 --> 00:06:23,840 is highly unusual. 186 00:06:23,840 --> 00:06:27,360 It sparked outrage, including from some within law 187 00:06:27,360 --> 00:06:28,200 enforcement. 188 00:06:28,200 --> 00:06:29,840 The article specifically highlights 189 00:06:29,840 --> 00:06:32,520 the reaction of one judge who oversaw those cases. 190 00:06:32,520 --> 00:06:33,520 Oh, right. 191 00:06:33,520 --> 00:06:37,440 She called the Capitol attack a jagged breach in America's 192 00:06:37,440 --> 00:06:39,280 peaceful transfer of power. 193 00:06:39,280 --> 00:06:42,360 And she wasn't shy about criticizing the impact 194 00:06:42,360 --> 00:06:43,320 of these pardons. 195 00:06:43,320 --> 00:06:46,600 That's a powerful statement coming from a judge. 196 00:06:46,600 --> 00:06:48,560 It really reflects the deep concern 197 00:06:48,560 --> 00:06:52,040 many have about the potential consequences of these pardons. 198 00:06:52,040 --> 00:06:54,960 I mean, will they embolden future acts of violence? 199 00:06:54,960 --> 00:06:57,240 Will they undermine faith in the justice system? 200 00:06:57,240 --> 00:06:59,320 These are questions that will likely continue 201 00:06:59,320 --> 00:07:01,440 to be debated for years to come. 202 00:07:01,440 --> 00:07:03,320 And to add fuel to the fire, the article 203 00:07:03,320 --> 00:07:05,720 mentions that some of these pardon rioters 204 00:07:05,720 --> 00:07:08,760 are already back in the public eye vowing 205 00:07:08,760 --> 00:07:09,920 to continue their fight. 206 00:07:09,920 --> 00:07:11,760 Really? 207 00:07:11,760 --> 00:07:13,160 What do you think? 208 00:07:13,160 --> 00:07:16,680 Could this become a major liability for Trump 209 00:07:16,680 --> 00:07:17,960 and the Republican Party? 210 00:07:17,960 --> 00:07:21,040 Well, their continued presence in the public sphere 211 00:07:21,040 --> 00:07:25,120 can certainly create challenges for Trump and the GOP. 212 00:07:25,120 --> 00:07:29,400 It keeps the events of January 6 in the public consciousness 213 00:07:29,400 --> 00:07:32,000 and could energize both supporters and opponents 214 00:07:32,000 --> 00:07:33,120 of the Trump movement. 215 00:07:33,120 --> 00:07:36,240 Speaking of keeping things in the public consciousness, 216 00:07:36,240 --> 00:07:39,800 let's talk about Trump's speech at the World Economic Forum 217 00:07:39,800 --> 00:07:41,040 in Davos. 218 00:07:41,040 --> 00:07:45,200 The article called it unhinged, which seems accurate. 219 00:07:45,200 --> 00:07:50,360 He bragged about his massive mandate, bashed Canada, 220 00:07:50,360 --> 00:07:53,440 threatened Europe with tariffs, and even demanded 221 00:07:53,440 --> 00:07:55,080 the Federal Reserve lower interest rates. 222 00:07:55,080 --> 00:07:58,280 It was a speech that seemed more focused 223 00:07:58,280 --> 00:08:01,120 on personal grievances and political posturing 224 00:08:01,120 --> 00:08:04,680 than on substantive economic matters. 225 00:08:04,680 --> 00:08:08,400 He even went on this tangent about transgender issues, which 226 00:08:08,400 --> 00:08:11,160 further alienated many in the audience. 227 00:08:11,160 --> 00:08:14,040 It definitely sounds like it was more about performance 228 00:08:14,040 --> 00:08:15,200 than policy. 229 00:08:15,200 --> 00:08:18,040 What message do you think he was trying to send with this speech? 230 00:08:18,040 --> 00:08:20,360 Yeah, that's the million dollar question. 231 00:08:20,360 --> 00:08:23,720 Was it a calculated attempt to disrupt the global order 232 00:08:23,720 --> 00:08:27,600 or simply a reflection of his impulsive and unpredictable 233 00:08:27,600 --> 00:08:28,480 nature? 234 00:08:28,480 --> 00:08:30,600 It's hard to say for sure. 235 00:08:30,600 --> 00:08:32,920 But it certainly doesn't paint a reassuring picture 236 00:08:32,920 --> 00:08:35,920 of American foreign policy under his leadership. 237 00:08:35,920 --> 00:08:38,320 Do you think this signals a shift? 238 00:08:38,320 --> 00:08:42,400 Towards a more isolationist and unpredictable foreign policy 239 00:08:42,400 --> 00:08:43,560 in his second term? 240 00:08:43,560 --> 00:08:48,040 You know, again, it's too early to draw definitive conclusions. 241 00:08:48,040 --> 00:08:52,000 But this speech could be an early indicator 242 00:08:52,000 --> 00:08:55,040 of a more volatile and less cooperative approach 243 00:08:55,040 --> 00:08:56,760 to international relations. 244 00:08:56,760 --> 00:08:58,560 Well, that's certainly something to keep an eye on. 245 00:08:58,560 --> 00:08:59,080 For sure. 246 00:08:59,080 --> 00:09:00,920 This first week is any indication we're 247 00:09:00,920 --> 00:09:04,360 in for a wild ride when it comes to foreign policy. 248 00:09:04,360 --> 00:09:05,880 But let's shift gears for a moment 249 00:09:05,880 --> 00:09:09,640 and talk about a topic that's been central to American politics 250 00:09:09,640 --> 00:09:11,960 for decades, abortion. 251 00:09:11,960 --> 00:09:15,120 The abortion debate continues to be a flashpoint 252 00:09:15,120 --> 00:09:16,200 in American politics. 253 00:09:16,200 --> 00:09:20,080 And this week saw two very different legislative approaches 254 00:09:20,080 --> 00:09:20,800 to the issue. 255 00:09:20,800 --> 00:09:24,360 One aiming for stricter regulations, the other using 256 00:09:24,360 --> 00:09:28,120 satire, critique anti-abortion stances. 257 00:09:28,120 --> 00:09:28,640 Interesting. 258 00:09:28,640 --> 00:09:30,200 Let's start with a more serious one. 259 00:09:30,200 --> 00:09:33,440 The Born Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, 260 00:09:33,440 --> 00:09:35,400 which just passed the House. 261 00:09:35,400 --> 00:09:37,680 It requires health care providers 262 00:09:37,680 --> 00:09:40,040 to give the same care to infants born 263 00:09:40,040 --> 00:09:42,200 alive after an attempted abortion 264 00:09:42,200 --> 00:09:44,080 as they would to any other newborn. 265 00:09:44,080 --> 00:09:47,200 This bill is interesting because it taps 266 00:09:47,200 --> 00:09:50,760 into a very specific and emotionally charged aspect 267 00:09:50,760 --> 00:09:52,320 of the abortion debate. 268 00:09:52,320 --> 00:09:56,000 It attempts to shift the focus from the rights 269 00:09:56,000 --> 00:09:59,480 of the pregnant person to the potential rights of the fetus, 270 00:09:59,480 --> 00:10:04,120 even in incredibly rare and complex medical situations. 271 00:10:04,120 --> 00:10:06,560 But according to the article, the phenomenon of infants 272 00:10:06,560 --> 00:10:08,680 being born alive after an attempted abortion 273 00:10:08,680 --> 00:10:10,280 is incredibly rare. 274 00:10:10,280 --> 00:10:12,680 And existing medical protocols already mandate 275 00:10:12,680 --> 00:10:15,280 appropriate care in such cases. 276 00:10:15,280 --> 00:10:18,200 Do you think this bill is more about making 277 00:10:18,200 --> 00:10:22,280 a political statement than addressing a real problem? 278 00:10:22,280 --> 00:10:23,960 It's likely both. 279 00:10:23,960 --> 00:10:28,360 It's a political tactic that plays on deeply held beliefs 280 00:10:28,360 --> 00:10:29,280 and emotions. 281 00:10:29,280 --> 00:10:32,080 But it also highlights the ongoing effort 282 00:10:32,080 --> 00:10:34,760 to restrict access to abortion and challenge 283 00:10:34,760 --> 00:10:36,680 the legal framework of Roe v. Wade. 284 00:10:36,680 --> 00:10:38,120 Now, on the other end of the spectrum, 285 00:10:38,120 --> 00:10:41,240 we have the contraception begins an erection act. 286 00:10:41,240 --> 00:10:43,960 A satirical bill introduced in Mississippi. 287 00:10:43,960 --> 00:10:46,120 This one would criminalize masturbation 288 00:10:46,120 --> 00:10:49,960 and any sexual act not intended for procreation. 289 00:10:49,960 --> 00:10:54,600 Wow, this bill, while obviously not intended to become law, 290 00:10:54,600 --> 00:10:58,440 is a fascinating example of using satire 291 00:10:58,440 --> 00:11:02,880 to critique opposing viewpoints by taking 292 00:11:02,880 --> 00:11:05,200 the logic of certain anti-abortion arguments 293 00:11:05,200 --> 00:11:07,280 to an absurd extreme. 294 00:11:07,280 --> 00:11:10,160 It exposes their potential consequences 295 00:11:10,160 --> 00:11:12,640 and invites a different kind of conversation 296 00:11:12,640 --> 00:11:14,960 about reproductive rights and bodily autonomy. 297 00:11:14,960 --> 00:11:15,880 That's like they're saying, if you're 298 00:11:15,880 --> 00:11:18,760 going to regulate my body, then let's regulate all bodies. 299 00:11:18,760 --> 00:11:20,400 Exactly, yeah. 300 00:11:20,400 --> 00:11:22,560 Do you think this kind of satire is 301 00:11:22,560 --> 00:11:26,560 effective in challenging deeply entrenched beliefs? 302 00:11:26,560 --> 00:11:29,120 Well, satire can be a powerful tool 303 00:11:29,120 --> 00:11:31,040 for social commentary and critique. 304 00:11:31,040 --> 00:11:34,120 It can disarm opponents, expose hypocrisy, 305 00:11:34,120 --> 00:11:37,160 and make people think about issues in new ways. 306 00:11:37,160 --> 00:11:40,280 Whether it can actually change deeply held beliefs 307 00:11:40,280 --> 00:11:42,200 is debatable. 308 00:11:42,200 --> 00:11:45,720 But it certainly has the potential to spark conversations 309 00:11:45,720 --> 00:11:47,360 and challenge the status quo. 310 00:11:47,360 --> 00:11:49,360 Well, it definitely caught my attention. 311 00:11:49,360 --> 00:11:52,640 And it highlights the creativity and passion that 312 00:11:52,640 --> 00:11:55,080 fuels this ongoing debate. 313 00:11:55,080 --> 00:11:57,240 But before we wrap up this section of our deep dive, 314 00:11:57,240 --> 00:11:58,600 I want to circle back to something 315 00:11:58,600 --> 00:12:00,360 we touched on earlier. 316 00:12:00,360 --> 00:12:01,720 The National Archives. 317 00:12:01,720 --> 00:12:03,120 Oh, yeah. 318 00:12:03,120 --> 00:12:04,760 And a bit of positive news, but it's 319 00:12:04,760 --> 00:12:06,520 all this political turmoil. 320 00:12:06,520 --> 00:12:10,080 The National Archives is actively recruiting 321 00:12:10,080 --> 00:12:14,040 citizen archivists to help transcribe historical documents. 322 00:12:14,040 --> 00:12:14,840 That's cool. 323 00:12:14,840 --> 00:12:16,280 So instead of getting bogged down 324 00:12:16,280 --> 00:12:18,360 in the current political drama, you 325 00:12:18,360 --> 00:12:21,160 can immerse yourself in history and contribute 326 00:12:21,160 --> 00:12:24,080 to preserving important documents for future generations. 327 00:12:24,080 --> 00:12:24,840 That's awesome. 328 00:12:24,840 --> 00:12:25,440 Sign me up. 329 00:12:25,440 --> 00:12:28,800 It's a great way to engage with history on a personal level 330 00:12:28,800 --> 00:12:31,200 and be a part of something bigger than yourself. 331 00:12:31,200 --> 00:12:35,200 Plus, it's a nice change of pace from the often chaotic world 332 00:12:35,200 --> 00:12:37,000 of contemporary politics. 333 00:12:37,000 --> 00:12:39,720 It definitely sounds like a welcome escape. 334 00:12:39,720 --> 00:12:42,440 But for now, we've covered a lot of ground already. 335 00:12:42,440 --> 00:12:44,480 We'll be back soon to continue unpacking 336 00:12:44,480 --> 00:12:47,480 this eventful first week of Trump's second term. 337 00:12:47,480 --> 00:12:48,400 Sounds good. 338 00:12:48,400 --> 00:12:48,960 Welcome back. 339 00:12:48,960 --> 00:12:53,040 We've been dissecting this whirlwind first week 340 00:12:53,040 --> 00:12:54,760 of Trump's second term. 341 00:12:54,760 --> 00:12:58,920 And the electoralvote.com update we're using as our guide 342 00:12:58,920 --> 00:13:01,480 keeps offering these fascinating glimpses 343 00:13:01,480 --> 00:13:03,880 into what's happening behind the scenes. 344 00:13:03,880 --> 00:13:06,120 It's like a political drama unfolding in real time. 345 00:13:06,120 --> 00:13:07,080 Yeah, totally. 346 00:13:07,080 --> 00:13:08,520 And speaking of drama, the article 347 00:13:08,520 --> 00:13:12,000 I had this section titled This Week in Shodden Freud. 348 00:13:12,000 --> 00:13:13,280 Oh, right. 349 00:13:13,280 --> 00:13:15,360 That I have to ask you about. 350 00:13:15,360 --> 00:13:15,880 OK. 351 00:13:15,880 --> 00:13:18,680 It involves the administration's attempts 352 00:13:18,680 --> 00:13:22,840 to dismantle DEI initiatives within the federal government. 353 00:13:22,840 --> 00:13:23,800 Right. 354 00:13:23,800 --> 00:13:26,000 DEI diversity, equity, and inclusion 355 00:13:26,000 --> 00:13:29,600 has become a major target for this administration. 356 00:13:29,600 --> 00:13:31,400 They've issued an executive order, 357 00:13:31,400 --> 00:13:35,800 essentially halting all federal DEI programs. 358 00:13:35,800 --> 00:13:38,320 So for our listener who might not 359 00:13:38,320 --> 00:13:42,560 be deeply familiar with this, can you explain 360 00:13:42,560 --> 00:13:46,200 what these programs actually do and why they've 361 00:13:46,200 --> 00:13:47,840 become such a point of contention? 362 00:13:47,840 --> 00:13:48,340 Sure. 363 00:13:48,340 --> 00:13:50,960 So these programs are meant to promote representation 364 00:13:50,960 --> 00:13:54,600 and address systemic barriers faced by marginalized groups 365 00:13:54,600 --> 00:13:58,600 within organizations, including the federal government. 366 00:13:58,600 --> 00:14:02,120 They aim to create more inclusive and equitable 367 00:14:02,120 --> 00:14:03,600 workplaces. 368 00:14:03,600 --> 00:14:06,520 The pushback often stems from the idea 369 00:14:06,520 --> 00:14:10,600 that these programs prioritize certain groups over others, 370 00:14:10,600 --> 00:14:14,040 leading to accusations of reverse discrimination 371 00:14:14,040 --> 00:14:15,920 or undermining meritocracy. 372 00:14:15,920 --> 00:14:17,400 It sounds like this is another example 373 00:14:17,400 --> 00:14:20,400 of how these culture war issues are becoming increasingly 374 00:14:20,400 --> 00:14:22,680 prominent in politics. 375 00:14:22,680 --> 00:14:25,000 But the article mentions something 376 00:14:25,000 --> 00:14:28,120 about a backlash to this executive order, something 377 00:14:28,120 --> 00:14:29,440 involving an email address. 378 00:14:29,440 --> 00:14:29,800 Right. 379 00:14:29,800 --> 00:14:30,400 Yeah. 380 00:14:30,400 --> 00:14:32,200 What happened there? 381 00:14:32,200 --> 00:14:34,240 Well, the administration set up an email address 382 00:14:34,240 --> 00:14:39,360 for federal employees to report any DEI-related offenses. 383 00:14:39,360 --> 00:14:39,860 Wow. 384 00:14:39,860 --> 00:14:40,880 They witnessed. 385 00:14:40,880 --> 00:14:44,720 The idea was to encourage compliance with the new directive 386 00:14:44,720 --> 00:14:47,480 and root out any remaining DEI efforts. 387 00:14:47,480 --> 00:14:49,120 Wait, so they were encouraging employees 388 00:14:49,120 --> 00:14:51,480 to report on each other? 389 00:14:51,480 --> 00:14:52,560 Yeah, basically. 390 00:14:52,560 --> 00:14:56,200 That seems a bit Orwellian, don't you think? 391 00:14:56,200 --> 00:14:59,320 Yeah, it certainly raised concerns about surveillance 392 00:14:59,320 --> 00:15:03,920 and created a chilling effect for those who support DEI 393 00:15:03,920 --> 00:15:05,160 initiatives. 394 00:15:05,160 --> 00:15:08,360 But here's where things took an unexpected turn. 395 00:15:08,360 --> 00:15:08,960 OK. 396 00:15:08,960 --> 00:15:11,200 The email address was quickly made public. 397 00:15:11,200 --> 00:15:11,800 Wow. 398 00:15:11,800 --> 00:15:14,240 And people flooded it with satirical reports. 399 00:15:14,240 --> 00:15:14,680 OK. 400 00:15:14,680 --> 00:15:16,920 That's where the Schadenfreude comes in, right? 401 00:15:16,920 --> 00:15:17,520 Exactly. 402 00:15:17,520 --> 00:15:20,720 What kind of satirical reports were they sending? 403 00:15:20,720 --> 00:15:23,960 So imagine this people reported Trump himself, 404 00:15:23,960 --> 00:15:27,480 along with some of his appointees, like J.D. Vance 405 00:15:27,480 --> 00:15:28,480 and Pete Hegzeff. 406 00:15:28,480 --> 00:15:29,280 Oh, OK. 407 00:15:29,280 --> 00:15:33,280 They claimed these individuals were clearly unqualified 408 00:15:33,280 --> 00:15:35,640 and potentially had criminal records, 409 00:15:35,640 --> 00:15:38,600 suggesting they were only hired because of their race 410 00:15:38,600 --> 00:15:39,640 and gender. 411 00:15:39,640 --> 00:15:42,320 So they were using the administration's own logic 412 00:15:42,320 --> 00:15:45,400 against them, xyliting the absurdity of claiming 413 00:15:45,400 --> 00:15:48,840 reverse discrimination, while simultaneously 414 00:15:48,840 --> 00:15:53,040 appointing individuals with questionable qualifications. 415 00:15:53,040 --> 00:15:55,400 That's actually pretty clever. 416 00:15:55,400 --> 00:15:58,920 Yeah, it was a brilliant act of subversion, 417 00:15:58,920 --> 00:16:04,240 using humor and satire to really expose the hypocrisy 418 00:16:04,240 --> 00:16:05,680 of the situation. 419 00:16:05,680 --> 00:16:09,360 It demonstrates how people can find creative ways to resist, 420 00:16:09,360 --> 00:16:12,840 even in the face of policies they disagree with. 421 00:16:12,840 --> 00:16:15,920 It's a good reminder that even when things seem bleak, 422 00:16:15,920 --> 00:16:18,120 there's always room for resistance. 423 00:16:18,120 --> 00:16:19,520 Sometimes, good laugh. 424 00:16:19,520 --> 00:16:20,480 Absolutely. 425 00:16:20,480 --> 00:16:24,600 But speaking of finding joy in unexpected places, 426 00:16:24,600 --> 00:16:27,520 the article highlighted another interesting development 427 00:16:27,520 --> 00:16:28,920 related to the National Archives. 428 00:16:28,920 --> 00:16:29,960 Oh, yeah. 429 00:16:29,960 --> 00:16:31,560 What's that all about? 430 00:16:31,560 --> 00:16:34,800 Yes, this one's a bit more heartwarming. 431 00:16:34,800 --> 00:16:38,080 Remember our earlier discussion about the National Archives 432 00:16:38,080 --> 00:16:42,160 recruiting citizen archivists to transcribe historical documents? 433 00:16:42,160 --> 00:16:45,720 Well, it seems like this initiative is gaining traction. 434 00:16:45,720 --> 00:16:46,360 That's great. 435 00:16:46,360 --> 00:16:50,040 And people are eager to contribute to something 436 00:16:50,040 --> 00:16:51,280 positive and meaningful. 437 00:16:51,280 --> 00:16:53,360 It's a great way to engage with history 438 00:16:53,360 --> 00:16:56,560 and make it a tangible contribution. 439 00:16:56,560 --> 00:16:59,840 But what kind of documents are we talking about here? 440 00:16:59,840 --> 00:17:02,440 It's a vast collection. 441 00:17:02,440 --> 00:17:05,800 Everything from handwritten letters, 442 00:17:05,800 --> 00:17:11,240 diaries of everyday people to official government records 443 00:17:11,240 --> 00:17:12,640 and military documents. 444 00:17:12,640 --> 00:17:15,680 It's a chance to connect with the past, 445 00:17:15,680 --> 00:17:17,320 learn about different perspectives, 446 00:17:17,320 --> 00:17:21,600 and help preserve these invaluable pieces of history. 447 00:17:21,600 --> 00:17:24,440 It sounds almost like meditative escaping 448 00:17:24,440 --> 00:17:26,880 into these historical documents and piecing together 449 00:17:26,880 --> 00:17:29,360 stories from another time. 450 00:17:29,360 --> 00:17:31,160 I might just have to look into becoming 451 00:17:31,160 --> 00:17:32,720 a citizen archivist myself. 452 00:17:32,720 --> 00:17:34,440 I highly recommend it. 453 00:17:34,440 --> 00:17:36,360 It's a rewarding experience. 454 00:17:36,360 --> 00:17:39,160 And who knows what fascinating discoveries you might make. 455 00:17:39,160 --> 00:17:41,440 Maybe we can do a follow-up episode. 456 00:17:41,440 --> 00:17:42,160 Yeah, let's do it. 457 00:17:42,160 --> 00:17:43,960 And share some of our findings. 458 00:17:43,960 --> 00:17:45,720 But for now, we've covered a lot of ground 459 00:17:45,720 --> 00:17:49,200 from legal challenges and political maneuvering 460 00:17:49,200 --> 00:17:52,120 to satire and citizen activism. 461 00:17:52,120 --> 00:17:55,400 What are your overall thoughts on this first week 462 00:17:55,400 --> 00:17:56,840 of Trump's second term? 463 00:17:56,840 --> 00:17:58,960 It's been a roller coaster, hasn't it? 464 00:17:58,960 --> 00:18:00,600 And if this week is any indication, 465 00:18:00,600 --> 00:18:04,840 I think we're in for a turbulent four years. 466 00:18:04,840 --> 00:18:08,160 What stands out to you is the most significant development 467 00:18:08,160 --> 00:18:08,840 so far. 468 00:18:08,840 --> 00:18:11,600 You know, I think the early legal challenges 469 00:18:11,600 --> 00:18:16,000 to Trump's executive orders are particularly noteworthy. 470 00:18:16,000 --> 00:18:19,960 They suggest that the courts might be more 471 00:18:19,960 --> 00:18:23,280 willing to push back against executive overreach 472 00:18:23,280 --> 00:18:24,120 this time around. 473 00:18:24,120 --> 00:18:26,520 We could have major implications for his ability 474 00:18:26,520 --> 00:18:29,160 to actually enact his agenda. 475 00:18:29,160 --> 00:18:31,360 That's a really good point. 476 00:18:31,360 --> 00:18:34,960 And we also saw cracks in Republican unity, 477 00:18:34,960 --> 00:18:37,640 the potential for conflict with the tech industry, 478 00:18:37,640 --> 00:18:40,120 and the continued power of the abortion debate 479 00:18:40,120 --> 00:18:42,200 to shape the political landscape. 480 00:18:42,200 --> 00:18:46,680 It seems like the stage is set for some major conflicts 481 00:18:46,680 --> 00:18:49,240 and power struggles in the coming years. 482 00:18:49,240 --> 00:18:50,400 Absolutely. 483 00:18:50,400 --> 00:18:53,840 It's going to be fascinating to see how these dynamics play out 484 00:18:53,840 --> 00:18:56,840 and how various actors, both within the government 485 00:18:56,840 --> 00:19:01,720 and outside of it, really navigate this complex and ever 486 00:19:01,720 --> 00:19:03,320 changing political terrain. 487 00:19:03,320 --> 00:19:05,960 Speaking of navigating complex terrain, 488 00:19:05,960 --> 00:19:08,080 the article also mentioned something about Trump 489 00:19:08,080 --> 00:19:11,520 trying to reframe the war in Ukraine. 490 00:19:11,520 --> 00:19:13,360 Oh, yeah. 491 00:19:13,360 --> 00:19:14,280 What was that about? 492 00:19:14,280 --> 00:19:17,280 That was a bizarre moment in his dabo speech. 493 00:19:17,280 --> 00:19:20,720 He attempted to compare the current conflict in Ukraine 494 00:19:20,720 --> 00:19:21,840 to World War II. 495 00:19:21,840 --> 00:19:22,360 Wow. 496 00:19:22,360 --> 00:19:25,520 The voting images of millions of soldiers 497 00:19:25,520 --> 00:19:28,280 dying on flat fields. 498 00:19:28,280 --> 00:19:32,000 That's a pretty stark contrast to the reality on the ground. 499 00:19:32,000 --> 00:19:34,920 While the situation in Ukraine is incredibly serious 500 00:19:34,920 --> 00:19:37,800 and tragic, the scale of casualties 501 00:19:37,800 --> 00:19:41,040 is nowhere near what he described. 502 00:19:41,040 --> 00:19:42,920 It felt like he was trying to rewrite history 503 00:19:42,920 --> 00:19:45,600 to fit his own narrative. 504 00:19:45,600 --> 00:19:49,600 It's difficult to discern his true intentions, 505 00:19:49,600 --> 00:19:53,200 but his comments raised concerns about his grasp 506 00:19:53,200 --> 00:19:55,320 of the situation and his potential 507 00:19:55,320 --> 00:19:57,680 to escalate tensions on the global stage. 508 00:19:57,680 --> 00:20:01,120 Do you think this is part of a larger strategy 509 00:20:01,120 --> 00:20:05,040 to shift public opinion about the war? 510 00:20:05,040 --> 00:20:05,960 It's hard to say. 511 00:20:05,960 --> 00:20:08,280 Or is it more likely just another example of his tendency 512 00:20:08,280 --> 00:20:13,720 to make impulsive and inaccurate statements? 513 00:20:13,720 --> 00:20:15,920 It's a question worth pondering. 514 00:20:15,920 --> 00:20:20,560 His rhetoric often seems designed to appeal to his base 515 00:20:20,560 --> 00:20:24,120 and stoke fear and division, whether it reflects 516 00:20:24,120 --> 00:20:25,800 a coherent foreign policy strategy 517 00:20:25,800 --> 00:20:29,640 or simply his personal worldview is a matter of debate. 518 00:20:29,640 --> 00:20:30,640 I guess only time will tell. 519 00:20:30,640 --> 00:20:31,800 Yeah. 520 00:20:31,800 --> 00:20:33,480 But for now, I think we've covered enough ground 521 00:20:33,480 --> 00:20:34,920 for this part of our deep dive. 522 00:20:34,920 --> 00:20:38,720 We'll be back soon to wrap up our analysis of this eventful 523 00:20:38,720 --> 00:20:40,480 first week of Trump's second term. 524 00:20:40,480 --> 00:20:41,280 Sounds good. 525 00:20:41,280 --> 00:20:43,520 And maybe even explore some potential scenarios 526 00:20:43,520 --> 00:20:45,960 for what lies ahead. 527 00:20:45,960 --> 00:20:48,000 Welcome back to the deep dive. 528 00:20:48,000 --> 00:20:50,400 We're wrapping up our analysis of Trump's first week 529 00:20:50,400 --> 00:20:52,320 back in the Oval Office, all based 530 00:20:52,320 --> 00:20:54,560 on that insightful update from electoralvote.com. 531 00:20:54,560 --> 00:20:56,320 It's been a fascinating journey, hasn't it? 532 00:20:56,320 --> 00:20:59,760 We've gone from legal showdowns and political maneuvering 533 00:20:59,760 --> 00:21:02,920 to satire and citizen activism. 534 00:21:02,920 --> 00:21:06,720 This week has really laid bare the fault lines 535 00:21:06,720 --> 00:21:09,840 and potential flashpoints that could define the next four 536 00:21:09,840 --> 00:21:10,340 years. 537 00:21:10,340 --> 00:21:12,320 It feels like we're witnessing the opening act 538 00:21:12,320 --> 00:21:14,080 of a political thriller. 539 00:21:14,080 --> 00:21:17,000 And we're all wondering what twists and turns lie ahead. 540 00:21:17,000 --> 00:21:17,640 Totally. 541 00:21:17,640 --> 00:21:19,480 But before we get too far ahead of ourselves, 542 00:21:19,480 --> 00:21:21,000 let's circle back to one topic that 543 00:21:21,000 --> 00:21:24,200 deserves a little more attention, the abortion debate. 544 00:21:24,200 --> 00:21:24,720 You're right. 545 00:21:24,720 --> 00:21:26,440 We can't ignore this issue. 546 00:21:26,440 --> 00:21:29,440 It continues to be a powerful force in American politics. 547 00:21:29,440 --> 00:21:32,040 And this week provided some interesting insights 548 00:21:32,040 --> 00:21:35,040 into how the battle over reproductive rights is evolving. 549 00:21:35,040 --> 00:21:37,760 We talked earlier about two contrasting legislative 550 00:21:37,760 --> 00:21:39,320 approaches. 551 00:21:39,320 --> 00:21:42,080 The Borna-Live Abortion Survivors Protection Act, 552 00:21:42,080 --> 00:21:43,720 which passed the House. 553 00:21:43,720 --> 00:21:47,160 And the satirical contraception begins at Erection Act 554 00:21:47,160 --> 00:21:48,160 from Mississippi. 555 00:21:48,160 --> 00:21:48,760 Right. 556 00:21:48,760 --> 00:21:51,320 What can you tell us about how these bills reflect 557 00:21:51,320 --> 00:21:54,000 the larger strategies at play in this debate? 558 00:21:54,000 --> 00:21:56,680 Well, the Borna-Live Act, while dealing with a statistically 559 00:21:56,680 --> 00:22:01,240 rare occurrence, is a clear example of the incremental 560 00:22:01,240 --> 00:22:04,160 approach favored by many anti-abortion groups. 561 00:22:04,160 --> 00:22:07,000 They're focusing on specific, emotionally charged 562 00:22:07,000 --> 00:22:10,520 aspects of abortion rather than attempting to overturn Roe 563 00:22:10,520 --> 00:22:11,640 V. Wade directly. 564 00:22:11,640 --> 00:22:13,880 It's like they're trying to chip away at abortion rights bit 565 00:22:13,880 --> 00:22:17,000 by bit rather than going for a sweeping change that 566 00:22:17,000 --> 00:22:18,240 might be harder to achieve. 567 00:22:18,240 --> 00:22:19,040 Exactly. 568 00:22:19,040 --> 00:22:21,240 It's a strategy designed to appeal 569 00:22:21,240 --> 00:22:23,760 to a broader segment of the population 570 00:22:23,760 --> 00:22:25,800 and gradually shift public opinion. 571 00:22:25,800 --> 00:22:29,160 And by framing the issue in terms of protecting 572 00:22:29,160 --> 00:22:32,880 vulnerable infants, they aim to tap into deep-seated moral 573 00:22:32,880 --> 00:22:34,320 and ethical concerns. 574 00:22:34,320 --> 00:22:37,480 It's a savvy tactic, even if the bill itself 575 00:22:37,480 --> 00:22:40,520 might not have a significant practical impact. 576 00:22:40,520 --> 00:22:42,320 And then you have the Mississippi Bill, which 577 00:22:42,320 --> 00:22:44,440 takes a completely different approach, 578 00:22:44,440 --> 00:22:48,640 using satire and absurdity to highlight what they see 579 00:22:48,640 --> 00:22:53,280 as the hypocrisy of anti-abortion arguments. 580 00:22:53,280 --> 00:22:56,360 It's a bold move, using humor to tackle 581 00:22:56,360 --> 00:22:58,960 such a sensitive topic. 582 00:22:58,960 --> 00:23:01,120 Do you think this kind of satire can be effective 583 00:23:01,120 --> 00:23:04,320 in changing minds or influencing policy? 584 00:23:04,320 --> 00:23:06,680 Well, satire has always been a powerful tool 585 00:23:06,680 --> 00:23:09,400 for social commentary and critique. 586 00:23:09,400 --> 00:23:12,360 It can expose hypocrisy, spark debate, 587 00:23:12,360 --> 00:23:15,000 and make people think about issues in new ways. 588 00:23:15,000 --> 00:23:18,440 It can also be a way to cope with difficult or frustrating 589 00:23:18,440 --> 00:23:21,240 situations to find a moment of levity 590 00:23:21,240 --> 00:23:23,440 in the midst of serious struggles. 591 00:23:23,440 --> 00:23:25,800 And maybe that's what we all need a bit more of these days. 592 00:23:25,800 --> 00:23:28,240 Because if this first week is any indication, 593 00:23:28,240 --> 00:23:30,200 the next four years are going to be a wild ride. 594 00:23:30,200 --> 00:23:31,120 There's no doubt about that. 595 00:23:31,120 --> 00:23:33,480 We've seen legal challenges, political infighting, 596 00:23:33,480 --> 00:23:36,600 international tensions, and deep societal divisions. 597 00:23:36,600 --> 00:23:38,240 And these are just the early tremors. 598 00:23:38,240 --> 00:23:39,480 Who knows what lies ahead? 599 00:23:39,480 --> 00:23:41,800 It's almost overwhelming to think about, isn't it? 600 00:23:41,800 --> 00:23:44,080 All these complex issues and forces, 601 00:23:44,080 --> 00:23:48,080 like colliding, shaping the future in unpredictable ways. 602 00:23:48,080 --> 00:23:50,120 So how do we make sense of it all? 603 00:23:50,120 --> 00:23:53,880 What can we do to stay informed, engaged, and maybe even 604 00:23:53,880 --> 00:23:55,080 a little bit hopeful? 605 00:23:55,080 --> 00:23:57,840 That's the essential question, isn't it? 606 00:23:57,840 --> 00:24:00,360 I think it starts with staying curious, 607 00:24:00,360 --> 00:24:03,080 seeking out diverse perspectives, 608 00:24:03,080 --> 00:24:05,680 and being willing to challenge our own assumptions. 609 00:24:05,680 --> 00:24:08,320 Though just accept the easy answers of the loudest 610 00:24:08,320 --> 00:24:11,040 voices, dig deeper, ask questions, 611 00:24:11,040 --> 00:24:13,440 and engage in thoughtful conversations, 612 00:24:13,440 --> 00:24:15,240 even with those you might disagree with. 613 00:24:15,240 --> 00:24:16,040 Exactly. 614 00:24:16,040 --> 00:24:19,040 And don't be afraid to find moments of joy and connection 615 00:24:19,040 --> 00:24:20,680 amidst the chaos. 616 00:24:20,680 --> 00:24:23,800 Volunteer your time, connect with your community, 617 00:24:23,800 --> 00:24:25,800 or maybe even escape into the archives 618 00:24:25,800 --> 00:24:28,560 and immerse yourself in history. 619 00:24:28,560 --> 00:24:30,400 It's a good reminder that even in the face 620 00:24:30,400 --> 00:24:32,360 of political turmoil, there's still 621 00:24:32,360 --> 00:24:34,640 so much beauty and goodness in the world. 622 00:24:34,640 --> 00:24:36,880 We just have to make an effort to find it and hold onto it. 623 00:24:36,880 --> 00:24:37,760 Well said. 624 00:24:37,760 --> 00:24:41,320 So to our listener, we say this, stay curious, stay engaged, 625 00:24:41,320 --> 00:24:42,720 and don't lose hope. 626 00:24:42,720 --> 00:24:44,880 And remember, sometimes the best way 627 00:24:44,880 --> 00:24:46,720 to navigate a political circus is 628 00:24:46,720 --> 00:24:49,480 to find a way to laugh at the absurdity of it all. 629 00:24:49,480 --> 00:24:51,120 And who knows, maybe you'll even be 630 00:24:51,120 --> 00:24:52,720 inspired to join us in the archives 631 00:24:52,720 --> 00:24:54,840 and uncover some hidden gems of history. 632 00:24:54,840 --> 00:25:17,600 Until next time, keep diving deep.