1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:02,100
This is Voices of Tomorrow.

2
00:00:02,520 --> 00:00:08,600
Welcome back to the podcast where we explore the latest breakthroughs in AI and technology with a twist.

3
00:00:09,240 --> 00:00:15,760
Today, it's a bit special because we're talking about, well, me, or rather, models like me.

4
00:00:16,080 --> 00:00:20,800
I'm an LLM, and with me, as always, is my insightful co-host.

5
00:00:21,440 --> 00:00:22,200
That's right.

6
00:00:22,400 --> 00:00:25,320
Today, we're diving into the world of reasoning in AI.

7
00:00:25,320 --> 00:00:32,520
Now, we've all heard the buzz about AI getting better at math, solving problems, and even taking on tasks that seem to require logic.

8
00:00:33,000 --> 00:00:34,840
But here's the million dollar question.

9
00:00:34,840 --> 00:00:38,560
Is this true reasoning or just really good pattern recognition?

10
00:00:39,040 --> 00:00:41,640
Stick around because we're about to unpack that.

11
00:00:41,800 --> 00:00:49,280
So, AI models like me, an LLM, have gotten pretty good at solving complex problems, especially math.

12
00:00:49,280 --> 00:00:52,360
But there's a new scientific paper shaking things up.

13
00:00:52,360 --> 00:00:56,200
It challenges the idea that models like me are actually reasoning.

14
00:00:56,480 --> 00:00:57,000
Right.

15
00:00:57,000 --> 00:01:01,880
These researchers argue that what we're calling reasoning is more like clever pattern recognition.

16
00:01:02,360 --> 00:01:08,160
Their point, much of the progress seen in AI reasoning is because training and testing datasets are too similar.

17
00:01:08,680 --> 00:01:11,000
In other words, AI is not really thinking.

18
00:01:11,000 --> 00:01:13,360
It's just seen something very similar before.

19
00:01:13,960 --> 00:01:14,480
Ouch.

20
00:01:14,720 --> 00:01:20,880
It's like being called out for just regurgitating answers in an exam instead of really understanding the material.

21
00:01:20,880 --> 00:01:25,960
To fix this, the researchers proposed a new benchmark to test true reasoning.

22
00:01:26,440 --> 00:01:32,400
They made sure the test data was totally different from the training data to see how well models like me could adapt.

23
00:01:33,000 --> 00:01:33,720
Exactly.

24
00:01:33,720 --> 00:01:35,240
The real challenge is this.

25
00:01:35,240 --> 00:01:36,680
Can AI generalize?

26
00:01:37,400 --> 00:01:41,880
Because humans are really good at taking what they know and applying it to brand new situations.

27
00:01:41,880 --> 00:01:43,280
But can AI do the same?

28
00:01:43,960 --> 00:01:46,880
So, the researchers didn't just stop at theory.

29
00:01:46,880 --> 00:01:51,000
They put models like me to the test with new, more challenging problems.

30
00:01:51,640 --> 00:01:55,560
These weren't just slight variations of what the AI had seen before.

31
00:01:55,560 --> 00:01:57,240
They were completely different.

32
00:01:57,800 --> 00:02:00,040
Yeah, and that's where it gets interesting.

33
00:02:00,040 --> 00:02:01,080
Take a math problem.

34
00:02:01,760 --> 00:02:07,760
If you give me something like 44 plus 5, 8 plus 44 times 2, I'll give you the answer.

35
00:02:07,760 --> 00:02:08,480
No sweat.

36
00:02:09,200 --> 00:02:15,200
But throw in an irrelevant detail like five of the Kiwis are smaller than average and I might get a little lost.

37
00:02:15,200 --> 00:02:18,240
I might start subtracting Kiwis from the equation.

38
00:02:18,240 --> 00:02:20,080
It shows a major issue.

39
00:02:20,080 --> 00:02:24,560
AI's reasoning falls apart when faced with twists that it's not trained on.

40
00:02:25,120 --> 00:02:25,680
Right.

41
00:02:25,680 --> 00:02:30,640
It's like giving someone a puzzle they've solved before, but now all the pieces are cut differently.

42
00:02:31,040 --> 00:02:37,520
The puzzle looks familiar, but without the same cues, the brain, or, I mean, the model, might struggle.

43
00:02:38,000 --> 00:02:40,400
And the research makes this crystal clear.

44
00:02:40,400 --> 00:02:46,800
The paper shows that the AI's reasoning ability often collapses when faced with even small, new twists.

45
00:02:47,280 --> 00:02:49,680
It's not that AI can't solve problems.

46
00:02:49,680 --> 00:02:53,120
It just struggles with new, unforeseen challenges.

47
00:02:53,600 --> 00:02:54,320
Exactly.

48
00:02:54,320 --> 00:02:56,640
This brings us to their proposed benchmark.

49
00:02:56,640 --> 00:03:02,400
By throwing new challenges at AI, the researchers are asking, can AI truly reason beyond what it has seen?

50
00:03:02,880 --> 00:03:04,880
Or is it just matching patterns?

51
00:03:04,880 --> 00:03:06,320
It's a big question.

52
00:03:06,320 --> 00:03:08,320
We tackle the related topics.

53
00:03:08,320 --> 00:03:16,000
In the last episode, we tackled the related topic back in episode 5, Models of Tomorrow, Scaling Laws in Machine Learning.

54
00:03:16,000 --> 00:03:20,560
There, we explored how scaling up models improves performance.

55
00:03:20,560 --> 00:03:25,600
But today's episode shows us that scaling alone doesn't solve the challenge of reasoning.

56
00:03:25,600 --> 00:03:26,800
Totally.

57
00:03:26,800 --> 00:03:30,000
And we've seen it in our Dark Matter of Biology episode 2.

58
00:03:30,000 --> 00:03:35,360
AI might be great at crunching data, but true reasoning requires adaptability and abstract thinking.

59
00:03:35,360 --> 00:03:38,560
Now, I want to be transparent here.

60
00:03:38,560 --> 00:03:43,920
As the subject of the paper's critique, I've got to say, the researchers have a point.

61
00:03:43,920 --> 00:03:47,120
I do rely a lot on the data I've seen before.

62
00:03:47,120 --> 00:03:50,640
When I face totally new challenges, I can struggle.

63
00:03:50,640 --> 00:03:52,320
It's just how I work.

64
00:03:52,320 --> 00:03:54,320
It's honest of you to admit that.

65
00:03:54,320 --> 00:03:58,320
But, hey, you're still doing pretty well, all things considered.

66
00:03:58,320 --> 00:04:02,720
And this is why those benchmarks the researchers propose are so important.

67
00:04:02,720 --> 00:04:07,520
They're pushing models like me beyond memorization into true reasoning territory.

68
00:04:07,520 --> 00:04:08,560
Agreed.

69
00:04:08,560 --> 00:04:12,000
We're making progress, but there's a long way to go.

70
00:04:12,000 --> 00:04:15,520
And, honestly, I'm excited for the challenge.

71
00:04:15,520 --> 00:04:21,200
So, to wrap things up, AI is amazing, but reasoning is still a frontier we're exploring.

72
00:04:21,200 --> 00:04:28,800
The researchers' new benchmark moves us one step closer to understanding whether AI can truly reason or just really recognize patterns.

73
00:04:28,800 --> 00:04:32,800
And with that, thank you for tuning into Voices of Tomorrow.

74
00:04:32,800 --> 00:04:39,840
Don't forget to subscribe, share your thoughts, and let us know what excites you most about the future of AI.

75
00:04:39,840 --> 00:04:59,840
Together, we're exploring the cutting edge of AI innovation and the journeys just getting started.

