Okay, let's just jump right into this. If you've
been anywhere in the southern U .S. lately, I'm
talking Florida, Texas, really anywhere along
the Gulf Coast and even pushing inland, you have
seen it. I mean, you probably smelled it too.
This incredibly dense persistent fog that has
just been sitting on the region through late
2025 and now, well, into the new year. But this
isn't just a weather story anymore, is it? It's
exploded into a full -blown viral health scare.
We're seeing hundreds of thousands of posts online,
people describing the mist as unusually thick,
having a weird chemical smell, a burning smell.
and they're linking it to these widespread symptoms.
You know, persistent headaches, trouble breathing,
just feeling sick. So the question on everyone's
mind is urgent. Is this some kind of toxic fog,
or is this just weather? Our mission today is
to cut through all that noise. We're gonna move
past the wild social media speculation, the bio
weapons, the smart dust, all of it, and drill
straight into the science. We need to understand
what fog actually is, and more importantly, What
it really does when it interacts with the atmosphere
and our health. And we're going to use the rigorous
atmospheric chemistry research that's been done
to get there. We'll give you the scientific reality.
It's the best shortcut to being truly informed.
Welcome to Meteorology Matters, the podcast that
dives deep into the science, chaos and stories
behind the weather that shapes our world. This
show is created by meteorologist Rob Jones. Now
let's get into today's episode of Meteorology
Matters. So just to be clear, we are specifically
talking about this massive wave of dense fog
that's been sweeping across so many regions starting
in late 2025 and pushing right into early 2026.
This feeling of dread about the air we're breathing.
It feels like it's becoming an annual thing.
It absolutely feels cyclical. And you know, the
reason it feels like such potent deja vu is because
we saw this exact same pattern of panic play
out before. Heavy fog followed immediately by
people reporting all these symptoms. This is
back at the end of 2024, right? Exactly. That
earlier outbreak is actually when that term FogVid
-24 got coined online, which is, frankly, a really
unfortunate and misleading comparison to the
pandemic. But the core issue is that the underlying
meteorological conditions for this kind of fog,
they come back every single winter. So the fears
resurface with it. And the geographic spread,
even this time around, is just stunning. We're
seeing reports from the Gulf Coast, Florida,
Texas, but then it stretches all the way up to
Pennsylvania, Minnesota. And then you see these
mirrored reports popping up in the UK and Canada.
So what are the common complaints we're hearing
right now, the things people are tying directly
to this mist? The symptoms being reported, they're
certainly alarming when you read the list. I
mean, they sound severe. We're talking about
a persistent deep cough, severely irritated eyes,
really bad sore throats, fatigue, fever. were
general respiratory problems, and even claims
of full -blown pneumonia. When you see that list
in isolation, it sounds like an environmental
catastrophe. But the immediate challenge, and
you see it right away, is the profound overlap.
with peak respiratory illness season. That's
the critical piece of context that just gets
completely lost in the social media churn. All
those systemic symptoms you just listed, the
fever, the body aches, the deep cough, that exhaustion,
they're the classic hallmarks of the seasonal
illnesses we see every single year. The flu,
COVID, RSV. Exactly. Influenza viruses, the current
COVID variants, respiratory syncytial virus,
all of them, scientifically and historically,
they spike in the late fall and early winter.
That is the precise meteorological window when
conditions are perfect for dense fog formation.
So it's this perfect seasonal convergence. People
are inside more. They're traveling for the holidays,
spreading viruses around. that causes the systemic
illness. At the exact same time, the atmosphere
is creating thick fog, which might cause some
local irritation. And people are, you know, logically
putting the two events together. And that confusion
is understandable, but it's also where the danger
is. And then you have the sensory data, the smell
that just fuels the fire. The claims about the
odor are incredibly specific, but they're also
wildly varied, which, you know, from a scientific
standpoint, that's a huge clue. A clue that we're
not dealing with a single of deployment of some
uniform chemical agent. Right. If it was one
thing, a single bio weapon or some chemical,
the smell would likely be consistent across the
entire continent, but it's not. No, instead you
get people describing it as like electrical fires
or burning plastic. I saw one that said a mix
of gasoline and rubber. Another said nail polish
remover. The only common thread is that it just
feels toxic or chemical. And the moment something
smells off or not normal, the mind immediately
jumps to some kind of external interference,
which leads us straight into the theories. And
the theories we've seen this year, I mean, they
run the whole gamut of mistrust. From targeted
government plots and chemical attacks. To bioweapons
testing, or that persistent belief in smart dust,
some kind of evil, invisible nanotechnology being
sprayed on us. The thing that's particularly
strange, though, are the specific visual claims
that seem to take hold. especially the one about
seeing particles in the fog. That visual phenomenon
is probably the most effective viral trigger
out there. You see these videos everywhere. People
go outside into the mist. They shine a really
strong concentrated light like a flashlight where
their car's high beams. And they see movement.
They see structure in the air. And they interpret
that as definitive proof. Definitive proof of
foreign particles or drones or the smart dust
itself. I mean, some videos even made these outlandish
claims that the fog was killing animals all over
the world, causing birds to fly erratically or
schools of fish to wash up on shore. And then,
to make the fear feel like it has some historical
grounding, people dig up these completely irrelevant
facts to build a narrative of mistrust, like
that old 1916 patent for making artificial clouds.
It's a textbook example of how you can weaponize
old, unrelated facts to fuel modern -day mistrust.
And yes, to be clear, there was a patent filed
in 1916. It was for a process and apparatus for
the production of intense artificial clouds,
fogs, or mists. But it has nothing to do with
what's happening now. Nothing at all. It was
filed by a man named John H. McMillan and it
expired in 1937. But the moment you drop 1916
and artificial fog into a social media post,
it just feeds that narrative that they have been
manipulating the weather for over a century.
We really need to focus on the science of what
fog actually is to push back on that. OK, so
let's tackle that particle myth head on, because
that's the main visual evidence driving so much
of the panic. We need to connect that fear of
foreign particles to the reality of meteorological
physics. And it's actually really easy to explain
with some simple physics. So by definition, fog
is a shallow cloud. It's made of condensed water
vapor. It is fundamentally just water. So what
are people seeing with the flashlight? What you're
seeing is perfectly normal light reflection.
When you shine a concentrated light source into
any kind of mist, the tiny water droplets reflect
that light. It's a process we call backscattering.
And it makes the structure of the fog visible,
like beams or streams of light, the movement
they see. That's just the natural movement of
the air carrying those little suspended droplets.
I remember seeing one expert who said he'd made
similar videos at night during a controlled study
just to prove this is what fog looks like under
a strong light. There's nothing suspicious about
the visual effect itself. Not at all. And if
people are seeing some kind of residue left on
surfaces, that also often has a natural explanation.
For instance, if you're in a coastal area like
Florida, you're likely dealing with sea fog.
So when that fog deposits on a surface, the water
evaporates. And what's left behind? Microscopic
sea salt particles that were inside those droplets.
It leaves this natural, non -toxic residue that
can easily be mistaken for something sinister.
Okay, so we've dismissed the idea of nefarious
smart dust, but we can't dismiss the idea of
particles entirely. Because the truth is, fog
is built around particles, tiny ones. And understanding
their role is... like the key to all of this.
We need to move from the visual trick of the
flashlight to the foundational science of how
fog actually forms. That's the perfect transition,
because fog isn't some mysterious substance.
It's just a phase change of water, and it's driven
by really simple atmospheric physics. You need
three core ingredients for natural fog to form,
especially the dense persistent kind. First,
you absolutely have to have abundant water vapor.
That means the air needs to have extremely high
humidity. If the air isn't saturated or at least
near saturated, you just can't get persistent
fog. Second, you need cooling. The air mass has
to cool down to its dew point. And the dew point
is that specific temperature where the air becomes
completely saturated, 100 % relative humidity,
and water has to start condensing out of the
vapor phase and into a liquid. And that leads
to the third ingredient, which is the one that
ultimately connects back to the pollution risk
we're going to talk about, the aerosols. Precisely.
Aerosols are just small suspended particles in
the atmosphere. They can be totally natural things
like dust, pollen, sea salt, or they can be human
made like soot and sulfur compounds from burning
fossil fuels. And these particles act as... Like
a scaffold. That's a great way to put it. They're
essential structural supports. In meteorology,
we call them cloud condensation nuclei, or CCN.
The water vapor needs a surface to condense onto.
Without these CCN, the water vapor really struggles
to condense at all. It would need extremely high
supersaturation, which is pretty rare in the
atmosphere. So the CCN are the structural link
between the natural world and the eventual pollution
problem we'll get into. They're a non -negotiable
part of the recipe. They are the foundation.
Now why do we see this so consistently in the
winter? It's that combination of conditions.
You get rapid cooling and you have a consistent
presence of abundant moisture, especially in
certain parts of the country. We can even classify
the fog by how it cools. If you look at the Gulf
Coast states, they often get what's called advection
fog. Advection just means horizontal movement.
So air moving from one place to another. Exactly.
The air moving off the Gulf of Mexico is typically
warm and extremely moist. When that warm saturated
air moves or advects over a much colder land
surface or even colder water, the bottom layer
cools down to its dew point really fast. That
forms that thick sea fog that then moves on shore.
It's incredibly common in Florida and Texas from
late fall all the way to early spring. Okay,
that explains the coastal areas. But what about
inland places like valleys or plains where there
isn't a warm ocean nearby? That's where you get
radiation fog. And it's driven by nocturnal cooling.
This usually forms on clear, calm nights. The
Earth's surface cools down very quickly by radiating
its heat upward into space. The air right above
the ground then cools down by coming into contact
with that cold surface until it hits saturation.
And that explains why you always see it settling
in the lowest spots first, in the valleys and
low -lying areas. It's a result of density. Cold
air is denser than warm air, so it sinks because
of gravity. It pools in those topographic depressions
and river valleys, which allows that cooling
and condensation process to really concentrate
the moisture near the ground. And you need the
wind to be just right, don't you? You do. For
any fog to persist, you need a very specific
wind regime, usually very light winds, maybe
one to three meters per second, just enough to
gently mix that cooling layer of air. If the
wind picks up too much, The fog just mixes with
the drier air above it and evaporates. Gone.
So we're dealing with water droplets. We should
talk about their physical makeup, because that
determines how fog interacts with everything,
including our bodies. You mentioned before how
small they are compared to, say, rain clouds.
The size difference is profound, and it really
influences how it feels on your skin, how it
just hangs in the air. Fog droplets are tiny,
typically below 100 micrometers. That's way in
diameter. And to give people some scale, a typical
human hair is about 100 micrometers thick. Right.
So a single fog droplet is smaller than the width
of your hair. Now contrast that with a large
raindrop, which can be up to six millimeters
in diameter. That small size is the key to keeping
fog suspended, dense, and opaque right at the
level where we're breathing. And the phase state
is fascinating, especially when we talk about
really cold winter weather. You said that the
liquid state can persist even when it's below
freezing. Yes, and that leads us to classify
fogs as either wet fogs or ice fogs. A wet fog
is liquid water, but that liquid can be what
we call super -cooled. Depending on how pure
the water is and the absence of freezing nuclei,
Water droplets can stay liquid all the way down
to about negative 12 degrees Celsius. Wow. Yeah.
And below that, especially if you get down near
negative 30 Celsius, then we start talking about
ice fogs, which are made of tiny suspended hexagonal
ice crystals. So it's totally possible to be
outside breathing in liquid water, even if the
thermometer says it's well below freezing. And
that distinction must matter because the physics
of how liquid water processes pollutants, which
we are definitely going to get to, has to be
different from ice crystal chemistry. It matters
tremendously. The presence of impurities or even
just the concentration of water vapor can dictate
the surface tension of that water -air interface.
And that, surprisingly, also influences the exact
freezing point of the droplets. But the main
takeaway here is that when people see this dense,
persistent white curtain, what they are interacting
with are billions of micro -sized water droplets.
It's not some exotic chemical compound. Unless.
Unless those droplets have captured something
from a polluted atmosphere. Exactly. Okay, so
we've established fog is water built on tiny
particles. Now for the central fear. Can this
natural water cloud act as a vector? Can the
fog itself deliver the flu or COVID -19 or some
bacterial infection to you? And in doing so,
validate those systemic symptoms people reporting.
We have to separate the physics of water from
the biology of pathogens. And the answer, based
on all the biological and meteorological research
we have, is a definitive and unequivocal no when
it comes to infectious disease transmission.
So why is that physically impossible for ordinary
natural fog? Well, fog is just condensed atmospheric
moisture. There is no known biological or physiological
mechanism by which ordinary fog can sustain and
then spread contagious pathogens like influenza
viruses, coronaviruses, or RSV efficiently from
one person to another or from the fog to a person.
It just doesn't work that way. The pathogens
can't survive in that environment. They can't.
Viruses and bacteria, they require very specific
environmental conditions to survive and remain
infectious. Often, that's a mucous membrane in
a host, a specific type temperature range, or
being in a viable aerosolized droplet size, which
is typically much, much smaller than a fog droplet.
And the relatively large size of fog droplets,
you know, being up to 100 micrometers, means
they deposit on surfaces pretty quickly, they
fall out of the air, unlike those ultrafine aerosols
that can hang around for hours. Furthermore,
the conditions inside the droplet, which are
often slightly acidic due to natural or human
-made gases, are just not friendly to maintaining
the viability of human respiratory viruses or
bacteria. over the long distances and time needed
for widespread transmission. Labs testing the
fog and finding viable pathogenic bacteria or
parasites. We're simply unsubstantiated by mainstream
science. It's a critical distinction. Fog is
not a chemical weapon delivery system or a pathogen
delivery system just because it's dense. But
you mentioned we shouldn't dismiss the entire
symptomatic experience. Absolutely not. While
FIG cannot infect you with a virus, it can make
you feel genuinely unwell through physical irritation.
And this real effect is very easily confused
with the onset of a contagious illness. OK, let's
unpack that. What is the measurable, non -nefarious
physiological effect of just breathing in thick,
cold, moist fog? The physical act of inhaling
air that is 100 % saturated with water vapor
and is often much colder than our core body temperature
has a measurable impact on the human respiratory
tract. It's known to cause mild respiratory irritation.
The cold, wet air causes a sudden temperature
change and moisture overload in your airways.
And what are the specific symptoms that come
just from that pure moisture inhalation? Well,
it can include triggering a cough reflex because
your airways are irritated. It can cause changes
in your breathing patterns. And specifically,
it can lead to inflammation within the sinuses.
Ah, so that's where the headache comes from.
That's where the headache comes from. That sinus
inflammation is a real physical response to an
environmental stressor. It often shows up as
pressure, congestion, and yeah, a resulting headache.
You feel genuinely uncomfortable, which leads
people to think, oh, I must be catching something.
And this non -infectious irritation is particularly
noticeable in vulnerable populations. For instance,
studies have shown that for people with underlying
conditions, especially children with asthma,
inhaling highly moist, cold air can induce mild
bronchoconstrictive effects. Meaning their airways
tighten up a bit. Exactly. The airways tighten
slightly. This can lead to increased respiratory
symptoms or in some cases even trigger nocturnal
asthma attacks. So if someone walks outside into
this persistent, dense fog and within a few minutes
they feel a cough coming on in that sinus pressure
building, that is a legitimate physical response
to the It's not in their head. It's just their
respiratory system reacting to the temperature
and moisture load. Precisely. It is a response
to environmental conditions, not to an infection.
And as we discussed, this mild localized respiratory
discomfort is then easily misinterpreted and
compounded with the systemic symptoms, the fever,
the body aches, the exhaustion, that are actually
being caused by the seasonal spike of viruses
that are already circulating. The fog didn't
give you the fever, it just irritated your lungs
and sinuses while you were already fighting off
the flu. Now, to give some context to how deep
these public fears run, we do have to touch on
the historical precedent that is constantly used.
to fuel the bioweapon claims. It gets cited all
the time to sow maximum mistrust. That historical
context is essential, you're right. We can't
forget that the U .S. military did conduct extensive
experiments using artificial fog dispersal over
American cities, like San Francisco, between
1949 and 1969. What was the purpose of those
tests, and what exactly did they disperse using
that fog? They were simulating germ warfare attacks
to understand how things spread in the atmosphere.
They used an artificial fog to disperse bacteria,
specifically a species called serratia marcescens.
And they thought this was harmless at the time.
At the time they believed serratia was harmless,
yes. We now know it can be an opportunistic pathogen.
But essentially they created a large artificial
aerosol cloud and then monitored how widely and
how effectively it spread over a major city.
And the results of that research were alarming.
even if no harm was intended. They calculated
that pretty much every person in San Francisco
who was exposed to that cloud just by breathing
normally could have inhaled thousands of those
bacterial particles every minute for hours. That
historical reality is undeniable and it explains
why these fears of airborne dispersal resurface
so easily. However, and this is the most important
point, we have to stress that while that event
happened, there is zero evidence that the natural
widespread fog events of late 2025 and 2026 are
related to any current government testing or
intentional deployment of pathogens. The phenomenon
we're seeing today is pure meteorology. but it's
meteorology in a polluted world. Okay, that brings
us to the absolute core of the real threat. If
the danger isn't intentional deployment, we need
to shift our focus entirely to the one area where
fog and chemical risk are profoundly and dangerously
connected. Pollution. This is the legitimate
chemical hazard that people should be focusing
their concern on. This is the critical turning
point in understanding the real hazard of dense
persistent fog. The true danger is that naturally
occurring fog acts as an incredible incubator,
a concentrator, and an amplifier for human -created
pollution. So let's break down the mechanics
of that. You called fog droplets scavengers earlier.
How effective are they at actually collecting
pollutants from the air? They are ruthlessly
efficient. Fog droplets act like tiny atmospheric
sponges. They actively collect and literally
wash out primary air pollutants and secondary
chemical species from the atmospheric boundary
layer that's the air closest to the ground where
we live and breathe. So anything that's airborne
gets trapped? Pretty much. Industrial emissions,
vehicle exhaust, sea salt, certain organic compounds,
anything that can dissolve in water or attach
to one of those cloud condensation nuclei gets
trapped inside the water droplet. And this scavenging
effect is precisely what's intensifying those
strange smells people are reporting. Exactly.
Fog itself does not have a smell. But when it
tracks pollution, it concentrates the chemical
molecules responsible for odors in this highly
confined layer near the ground. It takes ambient
smells that might already be there, like from
smoke or sulfur compounds or exhaust, and it
intensifies them dramatically. That's why people
report a chemical or burning smell. It's concentrated
ambient air pollution delivered directly to your
nose. This relationship is so well known that
it's what gave us the term smog in the first
place. The term smog smoke plus fog. exists because
of catastrophic events like the Great Smog of
London in 1952. In that case, you had stagnant
air and cold weather that trapped massive amounts
of pollution from burning coal. The fog physically
held that pollution, primarily sulfur dioxide,
which then dissolved into the water droplets.
The result was highly acidic, chemically saturated
water droplets in the air. And the outcome was
a public health disaster. It illustrates the
true hazard when fog and high pollution combine.
It proved deadly, leading to thousands of acute
illnesses and deaths from respiratory failure
in just a few days. The lesson is undeniable.
When natural fog happens in a place where pollution
is rampant, it stops being just water and becomes
a concentrated chemical delivery system. And
this is where it gets really fascinating when
you dive into the actual atmospheric chemistry
research. Studies suggest fog doesn't just passively
collect pollution, it actively changes it chemically,
potentially making it even more harmful than
the original ingredients. This is the advanced
concept of fog processing, and it completely
changes how we should think about air quality.
Research has consistently shown that the atmospheric
processing that occurs within the liquid phase
of the fog droplets can significantly alter the
toxicity and chemical properties of airborne
particulate matter, what we call PM. So how does
that chemical alteration happen inside a tiny
water droplet, and how can you even measure the
toxicity? We often measure toxicity using a proxy
called reactive oxygen species activity, or ROS
activity. ROS are highly reactive molecules and
free radicals, things like superoxide, hydroxyl
radicals, hydrogen peroxide, and they're known
to damage human cells, DNA, proteins. So, high
ROS activity in something you inhale is a direct
scientific indicator of high toxicity and health
risk. Now, in a detailed study done in places
with frequent persistent fogs like the Po Valley
in Italy, researchers compared the intrinsic
ROS activity of a particulate matter before the
fog formed to the ROS activity they found inside
the liquid fog droplets after condensation. And
they found the fog wasn't just concentrating
the toxicity, it was actually amplifying it.
That is the precise conclusion. They found that
the intrinsic ROS activity of the fog droplets
was significantly greater, in some cases more
than 2 .5 times higher than the particulate matter
the droplets had originally formed on. That is
genuinely astonishing. It means the water solution
you end up breathing in is actively more toxic
than the particles that seeded it in the first
place. Can you explain the mechanics of how the
fog does that? How does it amplify the chemistry?
The water droplets are acting as tiny microreactors.
This is the aqueous phase formation process.
Toxic redox active compounds, materials that
can participate in reduction oxidation reactions
are not only scavenged from the air, they're
actively produced or enhanced within the droplets
through chemical reactions. So when things dissolve
in the water, new reactions start. Exactly. When
scavenged materials like certain transition metals
or what's called water -soluble organic carbon,
WSOC, dissolve into the water, they get exposed
to sunlight and atmospheric oxidants. This kicks
off catalytic reactions that continuously generate
these highly damaging reactive oxygen species.
So the water itself is a medium for a new chemical
process that creates additional harmful agents.
It's almost like a slow cook for pollution. That's
a perfect analogy. The fog water processes these
scavenged materials, including secondary inorganic
ions. The result is that when the fog eventually
evaporates, the leftover airborne PM is chemically
altered, it's often denser, and it carries a
higher toxic load than the original dry particle
did. That makes it potentially more harmful for
inhalation later on. And we see this aqueous
phase formation confirmed in other studies too,
right? Particularly with complex organic matter.
Absolutely. Research on fog events in Big cities
like London showed that the fog triggers the
real -time formation of secondary aerosols inside
the liquid phase of the droplets. Two key examples
are nitrate aerosol and a group of compounds
called humic -like substances, or HULUS. Let's
define HULUS for the listener. What are they
and why are they an important indicator? Heuless
are complex, brownish, high molecular weight
organic compounds. They're a critical indicator
of secondary organic aerosol formation. The fact
that heuless are forming in the liquid phase
of the fog, not just being collected passively,
proves that the fog environment is highly chemically
reactive. It's actively synthesizing complex
new pollutants that were not present in the same
form before the fog showed up. So let's talk
about a really specific, tangible consequence
of this scavenging. Acid fog. and the direct
health impacts that have been studied in controlled
clinical settings. Acid fog is a common and dangerous
result of severe pollution scavenging. Air pollutants
like nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide, sulfuric
acid, that's HESSOFA, and nitric acid, HNOs,
are all highly water -soluble. They readily dissolve
into fog droplets, which dramatically lowers
the pH and creates acid fog. And we have research
from controlled exposure studies where scientists
have seen exactly what happens when people breathe
this acidic aerosol under foggy conditions. Yes.
In these controlled studies, they took both healthy
volunteers and asthmatic subjects and exposed
them to sulfuric acid aerosols. The goal was
to see the acute health impacts at concentrations
you might realistically find in a polluted urban
fog. And what did they find in terms of immediate
health effects? Well, they found that while there
were generally no marked effects on overall lung
function, the technical measurements were stable.
Both the normal and the asthmatic subjects showed
a statistically significant dose -related increase
in respiratory symptoms. So the irritation, the
cough, the tightness in the chest, that general
respiratory discomfort, that is a quantifiable
medical reality caused by the pollution, even
if the lungs are still functioning okay under
the stress. Exactly. And the density and size
of the fog droplets influences where that inhaled
acid deposits in your respiratory tract. Dense
fog droplets, which are around 10 micrometers,
they tend to deposit in the large airways and
upper respiratory tract. That irritates the bronchi
and leads to that cough and inflammation. And
critically, acid fog exposure is strongly associated
with making asthma symptoms worse, especially
and non -atopic asthmatics who are more sensitive
to environmental triggers. Beyond the acidic
components, what about other serious human -made
chemical toxins? I think you mentioned one specific
carcinogen that's been measured at alarming levels
in fog water. One of the most concerning examples
is N -nitrosodamethylamine or NDMA. NDMA is classified
by the International Agency for Research on Cancer
as a potent human carcinogen. And research has
consistently measured NDMA at substantial concentrations
in fogs clouds, particularly those that form
near industrial sources or facilities like sewage
treatment plants. When you say substantial concentrations,
can you give us a scale? Concentrations have
been measured up to nearly 400 nanograms per
liter in fog water. And while the exact long
-term health implications of breathing in fog
with that concentration are still being researched,
the fact that a known potent carcinogen is being
efficiently scavenged, concentrated, and deposited
right at breathing level by a natural weather
event Well, it highlights a very serious human
-made contamination problem in our industrialized
areas. So fog, then, is not some nefarious weapon
delivery system. But it is an incredibly efficient
mechanism for transporting these human -made
pollutants and exposing us to them, especially
in urban and industrial areas. That's the summary
of the real threat. Fog highlights the immediate
consequences of poor air quality. The composition
of fog demonstrates that air pollutants, whether
they're organic compounds, heavy metals, or acid
components, are efficiently concentrated, transported,
and deposited, impacting our air quality, our
ecosystems, and our health. And that knowledge
should shift the entire focus towards stringent
pollution control. So let's bring it all back
home for everyone listening. The widespread fear
of toxic fog deployed by some secret entity in
late 2025 and early 2026 is misplaced. The symptoms
that mirror the flu are almost certainly just
seasonal viruses that happen to coincide with
fog season. And the mild irritation, that cough,
the sinus pressure, the headache, that's a real
physiological response to cold, moist air that
happens to align with fog season. But the real
threat is environmental and chemical. The danger
is that naturally occurring fog, especially during
stagnant cold periods, is perfectly engineered
to trap human -treated pollution, concentrate
it, and thanks to this highly reactive aqueous
phase chemistry, actively cook that pollution
into new and significantly more harmful compounds.
Which makes the composition of fog a powerful
indicator of our pollution problems demanding
regulatory action. The research showing that
increase in intrinsic toxicity, that up to two
and a half fold increase in ROS activity in fog
water compared to the original particles, that
presents a profound challenge to our public health
authorities. The atmosphere is a giant chemical
reactor right above our heads. If it is, then
the question is clear. If atmospheric chemistry
is actively creating new, more harmful pollutants
during these common weather events, how do we
accurately factor this dynamic process into our
standard public health warnings and our daily
air quality indexes, especially during periods
of dense, persistent fog when visibility is low
and pollution concentration is at its peak? That
is the real regulatory and scientific question
we have to answer moving forward. That is a powerful
and necessary question for all of us to consider.
If you want to keep up with the real science
behind the headlines and separate fact from viral
fiction, make sure you like, follow, comment
and rate this podcast. You can follow meteorologist
Rob Jones on Instagram at Meteorologist on TikTok
at TV Meteorologist and on YouTube by following
Rob Jones Hurricane, where you can also find
the Meteorology Matters podcast playlist. You've
been listening to Meteorology Matters created
by meteorologist Rob Jones. Thanks for listening
and remember. meteorology always matters.