Welcome to Meteorology Matters. We're here today
to unpack some truly vital information, especially
as we reflect on, well, a pivotal event that
fundamentally reshaped our understanding of extreme
weather. And our preparedness for it. Exactly.
You know the date. You know the name. August
29th, 2005. Hurricane Katrina. A name that still
echoes, doesn't it? Especially along the Gulf
Coast. Particularly in New Orleans, the Devastation
Katrina unleashed was just staggering. It really
was. Imagine wind gusts consistently hitting
over 130 miles per hour. That's like a freight
train. Yeah, just immense power. And then the
storm surge. A wall of water, taller than a two
-story building, sweeping inland. The images
are still hard to forget. And the result was
catastrophic. 80 % of New Orleans found itself
submerged. And nearly 1 ,400 lives were tragically
lost. It's a date just etched into our collective
memory. A stark reminder, for sure. But here's
where our focus lies today, where it gets really
compelling. What have we actually learned in
the two decades since? Right, how have we adapted?
How have we innovated, improved our ability to
predict hurricanes? and protect against them.
That's the core question. That's our mission
for this Meteorology Matters Exploration. We'll
look at three major transformative shifts in
hurricane forecasting. Then we'll turn our attention
to the monumental engineering effort in New Orleans.
We'll examine the resilience of its rebuilt flood
defense system. Asking the big questions, are
we truly safer? And what challenges still loom,
especially, you know, with a changing climate?
What's truly fascinating here and also heartbreaking,
is that Katrina served as such a stark turning
point, a tragic one, obviously. It wasn't just
about the storm's raw power. It also, well, it
ruthlessly exposed critical gaps. Gaps in what,
exactly? And how we understood hurricanes, how
we predicted them, and maybe most crucially,
how we communicated the dangers. Ah, the communication
piece. Absolutely. To grasp the human element.
Think about Max Mayfield. He was the director
of the National Hurricane Center back then. I
remember him. He vividly recalled the conversation
with the New Orleans mayor right before landfall.
After hanging up, he turned to a colleague, apparently
with this deep sense of foreboding. He said,
he doesn't get it. Just profound concern in his
voice. That says so much, even with a good forecast.
Exactly. And for its time, the forecast was unusually
good. But that statement, he doesn't get it,
underscores this huge communication challenge.
A gap between the science and the understanding
on the ground. Precisely. A fundamental chasm
in risk perception, in translating foresight
into urgent action. So the lessons go beyond
just the storm itself. Oh, far beyond technology
and engineering. It's about the entire ecosystem
of disaster preparedness. Meaning? From the initial
forecast all the way through to community response.
How people organize, protect themselves? The
whole chain. The whole chain. So for you listening
today, we'll dive into how forecasting capabilities
have been transformed. Then we'll meticulously
examine those new flood defenses in New Orleans.
And finally, we'll grapple with the evolving
risks we still face, the persistent ones. Okay,
with that sobering insight into the human side,
let's turn to the tech. The incredible transformation
in hurricane forecasting itself. Right? You might
think, oh, it's just faster computers. But the
investment, the sheer technological leap since
Katrina, it's truly remarkable. It's far more
than just a software update. Absolutely. A complete
overhaul. So our first major shift. It revolves
around substantial funding and staff increases.
Katrina really acted as a catalyst. An unprecedented
boost, really. Recognizing the catastrophic toll,
Congress established the Hurricane Forecast Improvement
Program. Hey, Chef. as it's known. And this wasn't
just adding a few extra desks. It was a systemic
expansion at the Hurricane Center in Miami. Plus
a massive infusion of investment into hurricane
-specific computer modeling. Right. This wasn't
a Band -Aid. It was a strategic long -term overhaul,
an explicit acknowledgement of the value of accurate
forecasts. Both human and economic value. Exactly.
Both former director Max Mayfield and the current
director Michael Brennan, they've openly acknowledged
it. Katrina's forecast was good for its era.
But the tools were limited, severely limited.
This sustained funding completely changed the
game, gave meteorologists the cutting -edge resources
they needed. It's a clear demonstration, isn't
it? That targeted, significant investment. yields
immense progress. Measurable progress in scientific
prediction, directly enhancing our safety. That's
absolutely right. The commitment post -Katrina
wasn't just a reaction, it was absolutely necessary.
It showed that even brilliant minds are constrained
without the right tools. The computational power,
sufficient staffing, all critical. HFE basically
laid down a new foundation. Shifting from reactive
to proactive. Exactly. Research -driven, continuously
improving. It fostered innovation that was...
frankly, missing before. So beyond the people
and programs, what really shifted the paradigm
was the tech itself, right? The unprecedented
advancements. The eyes in the sky and the brains
behind the predictions. Let's start with the
satellites. The eyes. There's a fascinating,
almost unbelievable detail from the Katrina era.
Oh, yeah. Back in 2005, the satellites tracking
Katrina. State -of -the -art, then, capturing
images every five minutes. Pretty good for the
time. But they had this critical flaw. Their
solar -powered batteries ran low when they passed
through Earth's shadow. Oh. Which meant the day
before Katrina made landfall, precisely when
it was rapidly intensifying over the gulf. Don't
tell me. Those satellites went completely dark
for two crucial hours. Two hours. Right when
you need the data most. Imagine trying to track
a speeding train but losing sight of it for a
big chunk of time. That was the challenge. Unbelievable.
So what's changed? Today, thanks to a new generation
of satellites operational since about 2016, we
get high definition images every single minute.
Every minute. That's incredible. And critically,
no lengthy downtime in Earth's shadow. Continuous
high resolution surveillance. That makes a world
of difference. Missing those moments of rapid
intensification. Could be the difference between
life and death. We're far better equipped now.
Indeed. That continuous monitoring at such fine
resolution, it's profoundly transformative. No
more extrapolating from potentially old data.
Exactly. Before, those blind spots forced educated
guesses that could quickly diverge from reality
during the most dangerous phases. But now. Now,
near real time, uninterrupted surveillance gives
us an unprecedented understanding of the storm
structure, wind fields. moisture. The whole picture.
It's the foundation for much more accurate, timely
warnings, especially for rapid intensification,
which, as we saw with Katrina, was a huge factor.
And beyond the eyes in the sky, the forecast
models themselves, the brains, have seen huge
strides, too. Big time. In 2005, Katrina's track
was tricky. First predicted towards Florida,
then shifted west to Louisiana. And the models
then were notoriously poor at predicting that
rapid intensification the day before landfall.
But today, today, the average errors in track
forecasting have dramatically decreased significantly
better. And what about intensity? Specialized
models now give a much better indication of whether
a storm is likely to rapidly intensify. Much
improved signals. But not perfect, right? Michael
Brennan warned about that. Absolutely. Nature
can still surprise us. Yeah. The urologists can
still be caught off guard. You just have to look
at Hurricane Otis in 2023. A truly harrowing
example. Formed as a tropical storm October 24th,
Eastern Pacific. Less than 24 hours later. Landfall
near Acapulco is a monster category five. And
the models. They completely failed to predict
its terrifying speed and intensity. Over 50 lives
lost. It just underscores even with vastly improved
tech, that rapid intensification challenge remains
formidable. It really does. And it highlights
this broader, unsettling context. Climate change.
Yes. Researchers find it might not cause more
hurricanes overall, but it's likely causing some
storms like Katrina to intensify more quickly,
more violently, often just before landfall. Making
accurate, rapid intensification prediction absolutely
critical. Especially in our warmer world. That's
a crucial point. Otis is a stark reminder. Our
models are better, yes, but the environment is
changing. Warmer oceans mean more fuel. Precisely.
The oceans is the heat engine. Supercharge it
and you provide incredible latent heat for these
storms. So the challenge isn't just where it
goes. But how fast it strengthens. Especially
in that critical 24 to 48 hour window before
landfall. It's a race then. Science versus increasingly
dynamic storms. It really is an ongoing race.
And that unpredictability, like with Otis, isn't
just about wind speed. It connects directly to
the deadliest part. Storm surge. The wall of
water. So what does this mean for understanding
and predicting that? Because it's not always
the wind causing the most fatalities. Our ability
there has dramatically improved too. Storm surge
was undeniably Katrina's deadliest component.
That destructive wall of water breached the levees,
inundated the city. And initially experts were
baffled, right? Gauges washed away. Exactly.
So scientists like Herman Fritz, an expert in
coastal hazards, had to get creative, almost
like detectives. What do they do? His first stop
wasn't a lab, but the ravaged barrier islands
in the Gulf. He observed natural markers. Leg
wide. Bark stripped off trees by high water,
meticulously measured sand scour lines, things
like that. Wow. Using nature's own evidence.
Combined with satellite data, modeling, they
painstakingly estimated the surge height and
wind power. And Fritz emphasized something crucial.
He did. He said, most people don't die from wind.
Even with 200 mile per hour winds, you're not
going to get thousands of fatalities. You're
only going to get that with storm surge, flooding,
and inundation. That insight really reframed
the danger, didn't it? Absolutely. Fast forward
to today. The advancements are truly life saving.
Current forecast models are vastly superior.
They don't just predict the surge height. They
provide sophisticated maps showing potential
inundation depths in specific low -lying areas.
That granular detail is invaluable. It helps
officials decide precisely which neighborhoods
need evacuation. More targeted, more effective,
life -saving measures. And the impact is clear.
Historically, storm surge caused about half of
hurricane fatalities. But since 2013, that number's
down dramatically. To about 11%, according to
research by Michael Brennan and others. That's
a powerful demonstration. Science and tech directly
saving lives. Preventing countless tragedies.
A tangible success story for communities like
yours. That reduction is profound. It's about
the forecasting accuracy and communicating the
risk effectively. Visualizing the impact. Exactly.
Translating complex data into actionable info
for emergency managers and, crucially, for you,
the public. The hard lessons from Katrina applied
directly. A fundamental shift in approaching
the most lethal aspect of hurricanes. Building
on that, imagine getting a whole week's heads
up on a potential storm. That's not just an improvement.
It's a game changer for preparation. Forecasters
now have much longer lead times. Earlier, more
detailed warnings. Let's contrast that with 2005.
Back then, an official written forecast for possible
formation. Issued only up to two days ahead.
And visualizing weak storm clusters was limited.
Now. The National Hurricane Center can forecast
possible formation up to seven days in advance.
Seven days? Issuing watches, warnings, potential
paths much, much sooner. That extended lead time
is invaluable for large -scale evacuations. Time
to secure homes, gather supplies. relocate safely.
And for emergency managers, crucial days to pre
-position resources, activate shelters, coordinate
logistics. But there's still that challenge,
right? Being too certain too early. Absolutely.
Initial Katrina forecasts predicted that sharper
turn towards Florida before shifting west. And
Hurricane Ian in 2022. A stark reminder, shifted
south at the last minute, hitting southwest Florida
on the edge of the forecast zone, caught some
off guard. Tragically so. So while we have earlier
warnings, that balance between early heads up
and pinpoint accuracy, especially for landfall
location, it's a persistent challenge. But the
increase in lead time itself provides an indispensable
window. For communities to prepare and take life
saving action. This balance is delicate. Yeah.
Because the further out you forecast, the wider
that cone of uncertainty naturally gets. But
having that initial seven -day outlook, it transforms
the strategic advantage. Also... Allows preliminary
preparations, activation of plans. Critically,
it informs the public that something significant
might be developing. Shifting the focus. From
reacting to an existing storm, to actively monitoring
and preparing for conditions that might lead
to one. Empowering communities with foresight.
Even if the details are still evolving. Exactly.
A proactive approach. Monumental improvement
over the past. Which brings us to that crucial
question. What has New Orleans done with these
improved forecasts? With this new era of preparedness.
Right, the city at the epicenter of Katrina's
devastation. The flood defenses there underwent
a truly monumental transformation. A direct response
to those catastrophic failures. We're talking
about the post -Katrina investment in the hurricane
and storm damage risk reduction system. A massive
multi -billion dollar project. Congress approved
a staggering $14 .6 billion upgrade. Adjusted
for inflation in scope, that's around $23 billion
today. Wow. Not just repairs, though. It's not
at all. Construction of a comprehensive 139 -mile
integrated system. Levees, robust flood walls,
enormous floodgates. And the design goal? Protect
against a one -in -a -hundred -year storm surge.
That's roughly 15 feet of water. What a strong
Category 3 hurricane might bring. It's one of
the largest civil engineering projects in U .S.
history, isn't it? It really is. An incredible
feat of ingenuity and resolve to fortify a major
American city. An incredible investment. But
the key question, how well has this multi -billion
dollar system actually performed under tests?
Right. Building it is one thing. Seeing it hold
up under real hurricane pressure is another.
Has it delivered? The first significant trial
came in 2012. Hurricane Isaac. Isaac, right.
Category one, but large and slow -moving. Which
meant it brought a substantial 10 -foot storm
surge, more like a category two surge in impact.
And the HSDRS. Performed admirably. Held firm.
It demonstrated its ability to withstand that
level of surge. So a boost of confidence. Proof
it could handle the designed 15 -foot surge from
a Cat 3. Exactly. A crucial first reassurance.
Then came Hurricane Ida in 2021. A much bigger
challenge. And tragically, on the 16th anniversary
of Katrina's landfall. IDA hit as a powerful
category four, 150 mobile hour winds. Bringing
a devastating surge of nine to 14 feet to Placemines
Parish, south of New Orleans. And there was a
breach there, right? Yes, a levee in Braithwaite.
Yeah. Importantly, it was not part of the upgraded
federally funded HSTRRS. That older levee was
overtopped and breached. Huge damage. But the
HSTRRS itself. The main system? It held. Water
levels of 6 to 9 feet were common along parts
of the New Orleans system, reached just a few
feet below the top of the West Bank levee. So,
critically, no portions of the upgraded system
were overtopped? Correct. No overtopping of the
HSTRS. Okay, that sounds like a success. A major
success under a cat four. And in many ways it
was. But here's the critical what -if that keeps
experts up at night. Uh -oh. What's the what
-if? The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's
National Hurricane Center reported later if Ida
had made landfall just 17 miles further east.
Closer to New Orleans. Yes. Storm surge heights
against the southern edge of that West Bank HSDRS
levee would have been five to seven feet higher.
We should move. Undeniably overtopping and potentially
a catastrophic breach. And that section protects.
246 ,000 people. $41 billion in assets. A massive
area. So the system worked, but the margin was
razor thin. Extremely thin. It underscores how
even the best engineering has limits when nature
pushes that hard. A slight track change could
have been catastrophic. That what -if scenario
for Ida is truly sobering. It really highlights
why distinguishing between overtopping and breach
is so important. Two very different things with
different consequences. Vastly different. Understanding
that difference is critical for assessing and
communicating risk. Okay, let's break it down.
Overtopping is? During overtopping, waves or
the surge just wash over the top. The levee structure
stays intact. Like a bathtub overflowing. Exactly.
It causes relatively slow inundation behind it,
water flowing over. And the breach. That's a
catastrophic structure. failure, the levee fails
at its base, or a section collapses. Reading
a gap. A gaping hole where floodwaters pour through
unabated rapidly. Far, far more serious. Much
higher potential for loss of life. Because the
flooding is so swift and forceful. Precisely.
Often with little warning. And you said overtopping
often leads to a breach. Yes. That's the dangerous
connection. As water cascades over and down the
back slope, it erodes the base. Dowering it away.
Right. compromising structural integrity until
it collapses. Look at Katrina. 50 major breaches.
Almost all were caused by overtopping combined
with this erosion. Wow, and the difference in
potential impact. A 2011 Army Corps study, before
the final upgrades, predicted maybe 974 deaths
from overtopping in a major storm. Okay. But
if those levees breached... The estimate jumped
to 2 ,945 deaths. That's a huge difference. Highlights
why preventing the breach itself is paramount.
Absolutely critical for safety. So if overtopping
leads to breaching via erosion, what have engineers
done about that specific failure point? That
led to the armoring project. A key investment.
Tell me about that. The Army Corps spent $145
million completed in 2021 specifically to armor
those earthen levees against erosion during overtopping.
And they tested this. Rigorously. Partnered with
Colorado State University to build a full -scale
wave overtopping simulator. A massive facility.
Testing materials against simulated hurricane
waves. Exactly. and Louisiana State University
AgCenter tested different grasses for resilience
even against things like mowing. So what was
the solution they installed? Engineered turf
reinforcement mats integrated with specific grasses
installed along the inside the landward slopes
of key levee stretches. And the claim is? The
Corps states this armoring should greatly reduce
or eliminate breaches during overtopping. Meaning
less severe flooding. Their prediction, inundation
depths of only about five feet in an overtopping
scenario. compared to 1520 feet in Katrina's
lowest areas from breaches. A dramatic improvement,
but there's a catch. The critical caveat for
you the listener. This armor, while well tested
in sims, hasn't faced a real -world overtopping
by a major hurricane yet. So it's engineered
based on science, but awaiting its first true
test. Precisely. Represents a huge investment,
solid engineering, but the ultimate real -world
performance is still unknown. Which brings us
to another profound question. The system's built
for a Cat 3 surge. What happens when something
stronger hits? Because experts say it's only
a matter of time. It's not if, but when a hurricane
capable of overtopping these levees hits New
Orleans. Is there historical precedent for that
kind of storm hitting the area? There is. Since
1851, Louisiana's seen 65 hurricanes. But only
one brought a surge likely to overwhelm the current
system, assuming it works as designed. Which
one is that? The 1893 Cheniere -Kamanata hurricane.
A powerful category four. 130 mile per hour winds,
estimated 16 foot surge. 16 feet? That's above
the 15 foot design limit. Exactly. It obliterated
the town of Cheniere -Kamanata, killed over half
its residents, 1 ,700 to 2 ,000 fatalities overall.
third deadliest in U .S. history. Horrifying.
Any others? An 1812 hurricane, possibly a cat
four, according to researcher Carrie Mock, might
also have been strong enough. It highlights this
long -standing threat. So even with the incredible
engineering... Expert concerns remain high. Very
high. Bob Jacobson, a senior consulting hydrologist,
points out a critical distinction. What's that?
The system was primarily designed to reduce flood
insurance costs, meet federal mandates. Not necessarily
for a rigorous safety certification against every
extreme event. An important nuance. He believes
some parts could still breach with surges exceeding
that one in a hundred year level. especially
along Lake Pontchartrain. Why there? Less freeboard.
That's the safety margin between expected water
level and the levee top. Less room for error.
And he mentioned unpredictable factors too. Yes,
he notes that in the chaos, unexpected bad things
can happen. Like a barge breaking loose, slamming
into a flood wall, causing a breach. So it's
not just the design limits, it's the real world
chaos of a major storm. Exactly. Forces that
can test any engineering to its absolute limit.
That really emphasizes the unpredictable nature.
So what does this mean for the future? Because
the environment isn't static, is it? Not at all.
Climate change is adding profound new layers
of complexity. Altering the calculus of risks.
Unequivocally. It's increasing the risk to New
Orleans levies. in two major ways. Okay, what's
the first? Rising sea levels. Steadily rising.
Predicted rise at Grand Isle, the closest tide
gauge, is over two feet by 2050 compared to 2000
levels. Two feet is significant. And here's a
crucial detail. More than half of that relative
rise is actually from the land sinking. Subsidence.
Why is the land sinking? Largely human causes.
Extracting groundwater, oil, compacts the soil.
And the river levees themselves. while essential
for protection, stop the natural sediment deposition
that used to build the Delta land. So controlling
the river inadvertently contributes to the sinking?
In some ways, yes. We've altered natural processes.
And the implication of rising sea levels. Maintaining
that one -in -one of your protection requires
regularly raising the levees. A monumental, ongoing
task. Especially with debates over funding for
climate risk reduction. It's a constant uphill
battle against a rising tide, quite literally.
OK, that's the first way. What's the second?
Stronger hurricanes. A clear trend. Think of
them as heat engines. And a hotter ocean provides
more fuel. Exactly. Allowing them to grow more
powerful, intensify more rapidly, assuming other
conditions are right. Like low wind shear, moist
atmosphere. Right. Climate theory and modeling
consistently show a projected increase in the
proportion of Category 4 and 5 hurricanes. And
more storms that rapidly intensify just before
landfall. Which is a huge shift. It amplifies
the risk to a system designed for a Category
3 storm. Creating a dangerous mismatch. Defense
capacity versus intensifying threats. Precisely.
We're meticulously building for one scenario,
while the changing climate prepares for another,
more extreme one. What's fascinating here, though,
and a powerful argument for sustained investment,
is the clear, quantifiable value of investing
in meteorology. Despite the fragility of commitment
waivers. Right. The investments post -Katrina
yielded immense returns. A compelling example
of science funding providing tangible benefits.
How significant were those returns? Consider
this. The National Science Board, back in 2006,
recommended a $300 million annual increase in
hurricane research funding, a massive jump from
the $20 million at the time. And the Hurricane
Forecast Improvement Program, HFE, born from
that. Directly led to over 50 % improvement in
track forecasts, over 30 % intensity forecast
since 2005, across all lead times. That's huge
progress. And the economic impact. A 2024 study
found these advancements reduced average costs
by an astonishing five billion dollars per major
landfalling hurricane between 2005 and 2020.
Five billion per storm. How? Two ways. Either
decreasing deaths and damages via better evacuations
and prep. Or. Or increasing confidence in decisions
not to spend money on adaptation if a storm shifts
away. avoiding unnecessary costs. So for you
listening, this is a clear case. Scientific investment
directly saves money and lives. A highly effective
form of risk reduction, not just a cost. Those
numbers are striking. So where does forecasting
go next? We've seen incredible progress, but
are there new hurdles, new challenges? Unfortunately,
yes. There are real concerns about recent budget
shifts threatening future progress. How so? Sources
indicate significant budget changes affected
agencies involved in natural disasters during
a recent administration. FEMA the National Weather
Service, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration. Impacting their ability to continue
improvements. James Franklin, a retired meteorologist,
called the post -Katrina investment the greatest
success for forecast accuracy. But he and others
fear future progress might be stymied. making
the next generation of improvements less likely
to happen. It highlights that critical ongoing
debate about sustained investment in these vital
areas, especially facing escalating climate threats.
Are there specific areas where improvement is
still needed? Michael Brennan hopes to see inland
flooding forecasts improve next. Inland flooding?
Like from Hurricane Helene? Exactly. He mentioned
the National Hurricane Center issued an unprecedented
release about extreme flooding risk in the Appalachians
for Helene, really trying to ring the alarm bell.
But it still caught people off guard. The eventual
extent inland did, yes. As Brennan notes, we
learn something from every event, applying lessons
from Katrina Ian Helene to continuously improve.
A constant learning cycle. Absolutely. Communication
services forecasts always adapting. Then there's
that persistent evacuation dilemma. And it's
growing, isn't it? Rapidly intensifying hurricanes,
more common with climate change, shrink that
critical evacuation window. And New Orleans needs...
A full 72 hours to safely evacuate everyone.
A massive undertaking. That window might just
not be available with a rapidly intensifying
cap four or five. A terrifying prospect. Which
is why, for you, the listener, awareness is key.
Understanding these trends, the progress, the
challenges. It's part of the solution. Informed
citizens can advocate for a sustained investment
for community preparedness, helping safeguard
lives and livelihoods. So wrapping this up, what
does it all mean? We've journeyed through two
decades of incredible science, amazing engineering,
satellites to armored levees, all driven by the
harsh lessons of Hurricane Katrina. We've seen
forecasting is dramatically better. Storm surge
is better understood. better predicted. And New
Orleans defenses are significantly more robust,
much stronger than before. But crucial challenges
remain. Intensifying storms due to climate change,
potential funding fluctuations. We've made immense
strides, but Mother Nature keeps evolving. And
so must our preparedness, our vigilance, our
commitment to keep improving. This really raises
an important question for you listening at home
to consider. What role do you think continued
scientific investment plays in safeguarding our
communities? Beyond the tech. Exactly. Even with
the most advanced technology, the best engineering,
the human element remains the ultimate variable.
Our ability to prepare, respond, adapt. How do
we ensure effective communication, comprehensive
community preparedness, not only keep pace with
science, but actually lead the way? Especially
when the stakes are just so incredibly high.
It's the critical question. That's a powerful
thought to leave you with. And it really underscores
why meteorology matters. We hope this exploration
has given you a clearer, more nuanced picture.
The complexities and the triumphs in hurricane
science and safety. If you found this insightful,
please like, follow, comment, and rate Meteorology
Matters wherever you listen. If feedback helps
others, find the show. And for more incredible
insights into weather phenomena, make sure to
follow meteorologist Rob Jones. Where can people
find him? You can find him on Instagram as Meteorologist.
That's easy to remember. Got it. On TikTok, he's
TV Meteorologist. OK. And on YouTube, just search
for Rob Jones Hurricane. You'll also find the
Meteorology Matters playlist there. Excellent.
Lots of ways to connect. Definitely. Until next
time, stay informed, stay curious, and stay safe.