WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:04.620
Welcome to Meteorology Matters. So yesterday

00:00:04.620 --> 00:00:06.700
was quite a day, wasn't it? It was, Earth Day,

00:00:06.820 --> 00:00:10.039
the 55th anniversary. Yeah, 55 years. It's amazing

00:00:10.039 --> 00:00:13.460
to think back to 1970, 20 million Americans out

00:00:13.460 --> 00:00:16.100
demonstrating. Right. And this was before the

00:00:16.100 --> 00:00:18.019
big environmental protections we kind of take

00:00:18.019 --> 00:00:20.719
for granted now. Exactly. No environmental protection

00:00:20.719 --> 00:00:23.899
agency, no Clean Air Act, no Clean Water Act,

00:00:24.320 --> 00:00:26.399
not in the way we know them. And that massive

00:00:26.399 --> 00:00:29.100
public movement, that first Earth Day, it actually

00:00:29.100 --> 00:00:31.879
led directly to the EPA being created later that

00:00:31.879 --> 00:00:34.679
very year. It really shows the power of collective

00:00:34.679 --> 00:00:36.920
voice, I think, which kind of sets the stage

00:00:36.920 --> 00:00:39.119
for what we want to talk about today on Meteorology

00:00:39.119 --> 00:00:41.600
Matters. Right. Looking at the current environmental

00:00:41.600 --> 00:00:43.880
policy landscape, specifically under the Trump

00:00:43.880 --> 00:00:45.880
administration. Yeah, and contrasting it with

00:00:45.880 --> 00:00:48.740
those original Earth Day principles and, well...

00:00:48.490 --> 00:00:50.609
the direction things have been heading for decades.

00:00:50.969 --> 00:00:53.609
It's quite a shift. It is. The focus seems very

00:00:53.609 --> 00:00:56.310
much on energy production now, perhaps, over

00:00:56.310 --> 00:00:59.630
those protections. Let's dig into that. The administration's

00:00:59.630 --> 00:01:02.450
goal, stated as unleashing American energy, seems

00:01:02.450 --> 00:01:05.629
central. And that's involved actively dismantling

00:01:05.629 --> 00:01:09.079
regulations that they see as well. burdensome

00:01:09.079 --> 00:01:11.299
for fuel producers. Which, not surprisingly,

00:01:11.519 --> 00:01:13.519
has led to lawsuits from conservation groups

00:01:13.519 --> 00:01:16.079
trying to keep those regulations in place. Absolutely.

00:01:16.359 --> 00:01:18.680
And part of that regulatory picture, there are

00:01:18.680 --> 00:01:21.920
reports the EPA is preparing to possibly eliminate

00:01:21.920 --> 00:01:24.439
the need for polluters to report their greenhouse

00:01:24.439 --> 00:01:27.000
gas emissions. Wow. Eliminate reporting. That

00:01:27.000 --> 00:01:29.959
seems fundamental to tracking progress, or lack

00:01:29.959 --> 00:01:32.400
thereof. It does. How do you manage what you're

00:01:32.400 --> 00:01:35.310
not measuring, right? Then there was the proclamation

00:01:35.310 --> 00:01:37.750
giving coal plants a break. Oh, yeah, the two

00:01:37.750 --> 00:01:41.090
-year exemption exactly from tougher air pollution

00:01:41.090 --> 00:01:43.689
standards the administration framed it as necessary

00:01:43.689 --> 00:01:47.730
for energy reliability and National security

00:01:47.730 --> 00:01:49.670
reliability is often the argument used isn't

00:01:49.670 --> 00:01:51.510
it? But you have to weigh that against the air

00:01:51.510 --> 00:01:53.769
quality impact definitely and it goes beyond

00:01:53.769 --> 00:01:56.810
just exemptions reports suggest a much wider

00:01:56.810 --> 00:01:59.349
Dismantling is happening. You mean federal offices.

00:01:59.349 --> 00:02:02.530
Yeah Offices overseeing clean air, drinking water,

00:02:02.769 --> 00:02:05.129
our national parks, forests, conservation efforts.

00:02:05.629 --> 00:02:07.849
Climate smart farming, environmental justice.

00:02:08.710 --> 00:02:10.810
It sounds like a pretty broad sweep. It really

00:02:10.810 --> 00:02:13.889
does. And if these reports are accurate, it raises

00:02:13.889 --> 00:02:16.030
big questions about the government's ability

00:02:16.030 --> 00:02:18.189
to actually oversee these areas effectively.

00:02:18.770 --> 00:02:21.590
And tied into that are the reported mass layoffs.

00:02:22.129 --> 00:02:23.949
We're hearing about agencies like the National

00:02:23.949 --> 00:02:27.039
Weather Service, FEMA. the EPA itself, the Forest

00:02:27.039 --> 00:02:29.199
Service. Losing experienced staff like that,

00:02:29.240 --> 00:02:31.039
I mean, the institutional knowledge is huge.

00:02:31.159 --> 00:02:33.020
It could really impact how these agencies function

00:02:33.020 --> 00:02:35.960
day to day and in emergencies. So organizational

00:02:35.960 --> 00:02:39.919
changes, staff cuts. What about the rules themselves?

00:02:40.319 --> 00:02:43.319
Well, reports also point to slashing regulatory

00:02:43.319 --> 00:02:46.379
standards for fossil fuels, petrochemical plants,

00:02:46.840 --> 00:02:49.659
mining. Basically, polluting industry is potentially

00:02:49.659 --> 00:02:52.400
facing fewer hurdles. Which could mean, well,

00:02:52.520 --> 00:02:54.930
more pollution. Potentially. That's the concern,

00:02:55.009 --> 00:02:56.569
certainly. And then there's talk about going

00:02:56.569 --> 00:02:59.210
after the nonprofits, too. How so? There was

00:02:59.210 --> 00:03:01.889
a rumor, at least, a potential executive order

00:03:01.889 --> 00:03:04.770
to remove the tax -exempt status for some climate

00:03:04.770 --> 00:03:06.530
advocacy groups. That would hit their funding

00:03:06.530 --> 00:03:09.129
hard. It could seriously hinder their ability

00:03:09.129 --> 00:03:12.210
to operate. And alongside that, a push for a

00:03:12.210 --> 00:03:15.389
budget reconciliation bill. To do what? To cancel

00:03:15.389 --> 00:03:18.050
billions in grants from the previous administration.

00:03:18.629 --> 00:03:21.030
Funds meant for clean energy and environmental

00:03:21.030 --> 00:03:24.020
protection projects. OK, so that's a lot of action

00:03:24.020 --> 00:03:26.520
on the administration side. What's the response

00:03:26.520 --> 00:03:28.740
been like? You mentioned lawsuits earlier. Right.

00:03:28.759 --> 00:03:31.259
That seems to be a major avenue for pushback,

00:03:31.580 --> 00:03:34.199
challenging the legality of the layoffs, the

00:03:34.199 --> 00:03:36.819
funding suspensions, even things like removing

00:03:36.819 --> 00:03:39.120
climate change information from government websites.

00:03:39.300 --> 00:03:41.219
Has there been much street protest like that

00:03:41.219 --> 00:03:44.159
original Earth Day? You know, observers noted

00:03:44.159 --> 00:03:47.580
that maybe initially the large scale street resistance

00:03:47.580 --> 00:03:51.430
seemed a bit underwhelming. Any idea why? Well,

00:03:51.849 --> 00:03:53.789
speculation includes maybe just the sheer scale

00:03:53.789 --> 00:03:56.669
and speed of the changes, people feeling overwhelmed,

00:03:57.250 --> 00:03:59.669
perhaps some groups trying to remain apolitical,

00:03:59.750 --> 00:04:02.129
and maybe just general protest fatigue after

00:04:02.129 --> 00:04:04.469
several intense years. That makes sense. But

00:04:04.469 --> 00:04:07.270
is that changing? It seems so. We saw reports

00:04:07.270 --> 00:04:09.969
of increased mobilization recently, these all

00:04:09.969 --> 00:04:12.090
out on Earth Day actions. What do those involve?

00:04:12.319 --> 00:04:14.819
Environmental groups joining up with pro -democracy

00:04:14.819 --> 00:04:18.279
groups, their message seems to be about the fundamental

00:04:18.279 --> 00:04:21.100
right to live free and healthy lives, connecting

00:04:21.100 --> 00:04:23.759
those two ideas. Interesting link. Any specific

00:04:23.759 --> 00:04:26.350
examples? Yeah, in New York, there was a hands

00:04:26.350 --> 00:04:29.629
-off migrants march. They explicitly linked migrant

00:04:29.629 --> 00:04:32.389
justice issues with concerns about fossil fuels,

00:04:32.930 --> 00:04:35.350
arguing both relate to displacement and hardship.

00:04:35.750 --> 00:04:37.329
OK, so drawing connections between different

00:04:37.329 --> 00:04:40.550
issues. Exactly. And in Milwaukee, a stop the

00:04:40.550 --> 00:04:43.670
cuts march protested reductions not just in environmental

00:04:43.670 --> 00:04:46.689
and climate funding, but also health care, education,

00:04:47.250 --> 00:04:49.449
seeing it all as interconnected. Right. And I

00:04:49.449 --> 00:04:52.250
saw something about a planned protest targeting

00:04:52.250 --> 00:04:55.129
James Murdoch. Yeah. Yeah, the Planet Overprofit

00:04:55.129 --> 00:04:58.370
and Hashtag Tesla Takedown Coalition. They're

00:04:58.370 --> 00:05:00.449
reportedly focusing on pollution allegations

00:05:00.449 --> 00:05:03.850
against Tesla and framing the Trump -Musk relationship

00:05:03.850 --> 00:05:06.189
as a threat. Speaking of New York, the city controller

00:05:06.189 --> 00:05:08.629
Brad Lander seemed pretty vocal on Earth Day.

00:05:08.769 --> 00:05:11.629
He was. He directly condemned the rollbacks and

00:05:11.629 --> 00:05:15.180
pointed to specific impacts on the city. reported

00:05:15.180 --> 00:05:18.180
cuts to climate infrastructure funding, specifically

00:05:18.180 --> 00:05:21.060
mentioning FEMA apparently canceling the BRIC

00:05:21.060 --> 00:05:23.579
program that's building resilient infrastructure

00:05:23.579 --> 00:05:25.959
and communities. And BRIC funding was important

00:05:25.959 --> 00:05:29.019
for New York City. Hugely important. It was earmarked

00:05:29.019 --> 00:05:31.740
for critical flood protection projects, which,

00:05:31.920 --> 00:05:34.779
for a coastal city like New York, is vital with

00:05:34.779 --> 00:05:37.639
rising sea levels. Wow. What else did he mention?

00:05:38.000 --> 00:05:40.860
He also highlighted the reported halt of a major

00:05:40.860 --> 00:05:43.540
offshore wind farm project that was supposed

00:05:43.540 --> 00:05:45.660
to power hundreds of thousands of homes with

00:05:45.660 --> 00:05:48.240
clean energy. So hitting renewable energy goals,

00:05:48.459 --> 00:05:51.220
too. And impacting related port development jobs.

00:05:51.720 --> 00:05:53.579
Plus, he mentioned layoffs at the Department

00:05:53.579 --> 00:05:56.540
of General Services impacting lye heat. Lye heat.

00:05:56.600 --> 00:05:58.860
That's the energy assistance program for low

00:05:58.860 --> 00:06:01.079
-income households, right? Exactly. Helps people

00:06:01.079 --> 00:06:03.019
afford heating and cooling, so cuts there could

00:06:03.019 --> 00:06:05.120
really hurt vulnerable New Yorkers, especially

00:06:05.120 --> 00:06:08.139
with more extreme weather. So Landers highlighting

00:06:08.139 --> 00:06:11.000
local impacts. Is he doing anything proactively?

00:06:11.360 --> 00:06:14.139
Yes. He announced he's pushing the asset managers

00:06:14.139 --> 00:06:16.639
who handle the city's retirement funds harder

00:06:16.639 --> 00:06:19.740
on climate, demanding credible net zero plans.

00:06:19.879 --> 00:06:21.459
And he actually threatened to put their contracts

00:06:21.459 --> 00:06:23.459
out to bid if their plans aren't good enough,

00:06:23.920 --> 00:06:26.170
using the city's financial clout. That's significant.

00:06:26.509 --> 00:06:28.689
And didn't he also bring up Tesla again? He did.

00:06:29.029 --> 00:06:31.410
He reportedly renewed his call for litigation

00:06:31.410 --> 00:06:34.410
against Tesla, expressing concern that Elon Musk's

00:06:34.410 --> 00:06:38.050
focus on other ventures like DOGE could negatively

00:06:38.050 --> 00:06:40.550
impact Tesla's performance and, by extension,

00:06:40.750 --> 00:06:42.930
the city's climate goals, given their pension

00:06:42.930 --> 00:06:45.790
fund investments. OK, so pressure from multiple

00:06:45.790 --> 00:06:48.009
angles there. Yeah. Stepping back to the bigger

00:06:48.009 --> 00:06:52.629
picture, how are observers framing this overall

00:06:52.629 --> 00:06:55.480
direction? Many are calling it a war on the planet,

00:06:55.720 --> 00:06:58.920
essentially. An attempt to undo much of the environmental

00:06:58.920 --> 00:07:01.480
progress made since that first Earth Day, potentially

00:07:01.480 --> 00:07:04.100
leading to, well, more pollution and ecological

00:07:04.100 --> 00:07:06.860
damage. And we heard reports about the EPA administrator's

00:07:06.860 --> 00:07:09.639
plans. Right. Pledging to dissolve the agency's

00:07:09.639 --> 00:07:12.480
scientific research office, cut staff significantly,

00:07:13.199 --> 00:07:15.759
undo numerous regulations. It's quite a list.

00:07:15.879 --> 00:07:17.899
Which really undermines the science -based approach

00:07:17.899 --> 00:07:20.500
to policy, doesn't it? Correctly so. And of course,

00:07:20.600 --> 00:07:22.300
there was the withdrawal from the Paris Climate

00:07:22.300 --> 00:07:24.980
Accord. A huge international step. And efforts

00:07:24.980 --> 00:07:27.000
reported to get around the Supreme Court decision

00:07:27.000 --> 00:07:29.939
that allows the EPA to limit carbon dioxide emissions,

00:07:30.660 --> 00:07:32.980
plus canceling clean energy incentives and, as

00:07:32.980 --> 00:07:35.480
we mentioned, that reported desire to let polluters

00:07:35.480 --> 00:07:38.160
skip emissions reporting. It paints a picture

00:07:38.160 --> 00:07:41.800
of really trying to remove climate considerations

00:07:41.800 --> 00:07:44.410
from policy. That seems to be the direction.

00:07:44.670 --> 00:07:47.089
We even heard about a leading climate scientist

00:07:47.089 --> 00:07:49.290
who actually moved to New Zealand because of

00:07:49.290 --> 00:07:51.870
the administration's stance. Really? Left the

00:07:51.870 --> 00:07:54.550
country? Yeah. And warned that other researchers

00:07:54.550 --> 00:07:57.649
might follow. He stressed how serious exiting

00:07:57.649 --> 00:08:00.189
the Paris agreement was, saying the U .S. can't

00:08:00.189 --> 00:08:02.949
just opt out without major consequences, and

00:08:02.949 --> 00:08:05.110
that there's an ethical responsibility to lead.

00:08:05.329 --> 00:08:07.529
What does the public think about all this? Any

00:08:07.529 --> 00:08:10.199
sense of that? Well, one survey reportedly found

00:08:10.199 --> 00:08:12.839
that over half of Americans actually oppose this

00:08:12.839 --> 00:08:15.740
reversal on climate leadership, including Republicans.

00:08:16.100 --> 00:08:17.879
Apparently, younger Republicans showed notable

00:08:17.879 --> 00:08:20.500
concern. The perception seems to be growing that

00:08:20.500 --> 00:08:22.819
these rollbacks could threaten jobs, especially

00:08:22.819 --> 00:08:25.500
in clean energy, plus public health and the environment

00:08:25.500 --> 00:08:29.079
generally, and U .S. leadership. OK, so potentially

00:08:29.079 --> 00:08:32.059
a gap between policy direction and public opinion

00:08:32.059 --> 00:08:34.879
there. Now, there was one more area of concern

00:08:34.879 --> 00:08:38.740
mentioned. International aid. Yes, very concerning

00:08:38.740 --> 00:08:42.360
reports about the cancellation of USAID and its

00:08:42.360 --> 00:08:44.399
international conservation programs. What kind

00:08:44.399 --> 00:08:46.360
of programs are we talking about? Things like

00:08:46.360 --> 00:08:49.299
protecting endangered species, fighting poaching,

00:08:49.659 --> 00:08:52.759
illegal fishing, providing clean water and sanitation

00:08:52.759 --> 00:08:55.379
in developing countries. Really vital work. And

00:08:55.379 --> 00:08:57.730
the impact of cutting that. Potentially devastating

00:08:57.730 --> 00:09:00.289
for those efforts. Yeah. But it gets even more

00:09:00.289 --> 00:09:03.110
immediate and tragic. How so? There are alarming

00:09:03.110 --> 00:09:06.909
reports about cuts to emergency food aid, specifically

00:09:06.909 --> 00:09:09.669
aid for starving children in countries like Bangladesh

00:09:09.669 --> 00:09:11.950
and Somalia. Emergency food aid. You mean like

00:09:11.950 --> 00:09:14.210
therapeutic food. Exactly. Life -saving stuff

00:09:14.210 --> 00:09:17.210
like that special peanut based. Apparently, despite

00:09:17.210 --> 00:09:20.090
some initial focus on the issue, the administration's

00:09:20.090 --> 00:09:22.889
actions have disrupted the entire delivery pipeline.

00:09:23.049 --> 00:09:25.210
So the food isn't getting there. Reports say

00:09:25.210 --> 00:09:27.169
shipments of this critical aid are literally

00:09:27.169 --> 00:09:29.629
stuck here in the U .S. And for children suffering

00:09:29.629 --> 00:09:32.889
severe malnutrition, delays like that. While

00:09:32.889 --> 00:09:36.129
the consequences can be fatal very quickly. That's

00:09:36.129 --> 00:09:38.370
incredibly grim. It puts a very human face on

00:09:38.370 --> 00:09:40.970
these policy decisions. It really does. It shows

00:09:40.970 --> 00:09:43.090
how decisions made in Washington can have life

00:09:43.090 --> 00:09:45.289
or death consequences thousands of miles away.

00:09:45.490 --> 00:09:48.230
So wrapping this up, reflecting on that 55th

00:09:48.230 --> 00:09:51.289
anniversary of Earth Day yesterday, the contrast

00:09:51.289 --> 00:09:54.460
is just unavoidable, isn't it? Stark, you had

00:09:54.460 --> 00:09:56.559
this moment that sparked major environmental

00:09:56.559 --> 00:09:59.919
protections and now a very different direction

00:09:59.919 --> 00:10:02.379
being reported. With serious concerns being raised

00:10:02.379 --> 00:10:05.679
about the long -term impact on, well, everything,

00:10:06.019 --> 00:10:08.299
our environment, public health, our international

00:10:08.299 --> 00:10:10.659
standing, and as we just heard, even the most

00:10:10.659 --> 00:10:13.360
vulnerable populations globally. It's a pivotal

00:10:13.360 --> 00:10:16.299
moment, it feels like, forcing a hard look at

00:10:16.299 --> 00:10:18.419
the kind of future these choices might lead to.

00:10:18.759 --> 00:10:20.759
Absolutely. Which brings us to a final thought

00:10:20.759 --> 00:10:23.190
for you, our listeners. Thinking out the history

00:10:23.190 --> 00:10:25.909
that first Earth Day and everything we've discussed

00:10:25.909 --> 00:10:29.809
today on meteorology matters What role do you

00:10:29.809 --> 00:10:33.649
see for individual action? For collective mobilization

00:10:33.649 --> 00:10:35.929
in shaping where we go from here on environmental

00:10:35.929 --> 00:10:38.230
policy. It's definitely something worth pondering.

00:10:38.230 --> 00:10:41.519
How does change happen now indeed? Keep thinking.

00:10:41.759 --> 00:10:43.840
Keep engaging. And for more discussions like

00:10:43.840 --> 00:10:46.200
this, remember you can follow meteorologist Rob

00:10:46.200 --> 00:10:48.779
Jones on Instagram, that's meteorologist. On

00:10:48.779 --> 00:10:51.220
TikTok, it's TV meteorologist. And on YouTube,

00:10:51.500 --> 00:10:53.600
follow Rob Jones Hurricane. You'll also find

00:10:53.600 --> 00:10:55.539
the Meteorology Matters podcast playlist there

00:10:55.539 --> 00:10:55.980
on YouTube.
