1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:02,400
Welcome back everybody to Meteorology Matters.

2
00:00:02,400 --> 00:00:04,560
We like to get into all kinds of cool weather topics,

3
00:00:04,560 --> 00:00:06,440
but this one today is,

4
00:00:06,440 --> 00:00:07,880
I don't even know how to describe this one.

5
00:00:07,880 --> 00:00:08,840
It's a-

6
00:00:08,840 --> 00:00:10,080
Really, it's something else.

7
00:00:10,080 --> 00:00:11,440
Yeah, kind of a strange intersection

8
00:00:11,440 --> 00:00:14,120
between politics and technology and meteorology.

9
00:00:14,120 --> 00:00:15,160
Absolutely.

10
00:00:15,160 --> 00:00:17,840
But if you want to stay up to date on all things weather,

11
00:00:17,840 --> 00:00:21,320
you can follow meteorologist Rob Jones on Instagram

12
00:00:21,320 --> 00:00:26,160
at meteorologist on TikTok, at TV meteorologist,

13
00:00:26,160 --> 00:00:29,240
and on YouTube at Rob Jones' hurricane.

14
00:00:29,240 --> 00:00:31,560
You can also find the Meteorology Matters playlist

15
00:00:31,560 --> 00:00:32,400
there as well.

16
00:00:32,400 --> 00:00:33,240
Very good.

17
00:00:33,240 --> 00:00:35,680
So NOAA, that's the National Oceanic

18
00:00:35,680 --> 00:00:37,000
and Atmospheric Administration.

19
00:00:37,000 --> 00:00:37,840
Right.

20
00:00:37,840 --> 00:00:39,080
Got slammed with a bunch of weird emails.

21
00:00:39,080 --> 00:00:39,920
Right.

22
00:00:39,920 --> 00:00:43,320
So imagine, you know, thousands of NOAA employees.

23
00:00:43,320 --> 00:00:44,160
Right.

24
00:00:44,160 --> 00:00:45,960
You know, people who are tracking hurricanes

25
00:00:45,960 --> 00:00:47,480
and studying climate change.

26
00:00:47,480 --> 00:00:48,320
Of course.

27
00:00:48,320 --> 00:00:49,520
They open up their inboxes.

28
00:00:49,520 --> 00:00:50,640
Yeah, what's waiting for them.

29
00:00:50,640 --> 00:00:52,560
The interesting thing is to say the least.

30
00:00:52,560 --> 00:00:55,480
Yeah, I think what's interesting here is how

31
00:00:55,480 --> 00:00:57,880
this really kind of exposes the changes

32
00:00:57,880 --> 00:01:00,400
that the Trump administration made to the federal communication

33
00:01:00,400 --> 00:01:01,400
systems.

34
00:01:01,400 --> 00:01:04,600
They put in this new system that allowed anyone to email

35
00:01:04,600 --> 00:01:08,040
all 2.3 million federal employees from one address.

36
00:01:08,040 --> 00:01:10,320
Wait, so you're telling me that anybody could just send out

37
00:01:10,320 --> 00:01:13,760
a mass email to the entire federal workforce.

38
00:01:13,760 --> 00:01:14,240
Yeah.

39
00:01:14,240 --> 00:01:16,280
That's got to be some kind of security nightmare.

40
00:01:16,280 --> 00:01:18,840
Yeah, you would definitely be right to be concerned.

41
00:01:18,840 --> 00:01:21,440
And in fact, some employees, they initially just

42
00:01:21,440 --> 00:01:24,200
thought that these emails were just spam, you know?

43
00:01:24,200 --> 00:01:24,440
Right.

44
00:01:24,440 --> 00:01:26,280
But it quickly became clear that, you know,

45
00:01:26,280 --> 00:01:28,760
this new system was vulnerable to misuse.

46
00:01:28,760 --> 00:01:31,520
And there was actually this journalist, Ken Klippenstein,

47
00:01:31,520 --> 00:01:34,120
who actually was able to send his newsletter

48
00:01:34,120 --> 00:01:36,880
to all 13,000 NOAA employees.

49
00:01:36,880 --> 00:01:40,440
So he just blasted his newsletter to everybody at NOAA.

50
00:01:40,440 --> 00:01:43,120
That's pretty serious security breach.

51
00:01:43,120 --> 00:01:43,840
Yeah.

52
00:01:43,840 --> 00:01:46,440
Seems like maybe the Trump administration kind of overlooked

53
00:01:46,440 --> 00:01:48,920
some pretty crucial security measures here.

54
00:01:48,920 --> 00:01:51,760
Yeah, it definitely raises some questions about their approach

55
00:01:51,760 --> 00:01:53,520
to cybersecurity for sure.

56
00:01:53,520 --> 00:01:57,400
And the content of some of these emails to NOAA employees

57
00:01:57,400 --> 00:01:59,000
were pretty alarming.

58
00:01:59,000 --> 00:02:01,720
Some were like urging employees to resign,

59
00:02:01,720 --> 00:02:04,120
a lot of inappropriate language, even promoting things

60
00:02:04,120 --> 00:02:05,560
like Scientology subscriptions.

61
00:02:05,560 --> 00:02:06,800
Scientology subscriptions.

62
00:02:06,800 --> 00:02:08,160
That's a new one.

63
00:02:08,160 --> 00:02:10,160
Sounds like somebody was having a little too much

64
00:02:10,160 --> 00:02:13,200
fun with their access to the entire federal workforce.

65
00:02:13,200 --> 00:02:15,160
But this wasn't like a one-off thing, was it?

66
00:02:15,160 --> 00:02:16,600
No, you're right.

67
00:02:16,600 --> 00:02:20,120
This incident at NOAA is kind of part of a larger pattern

68
00:02:20,120 --> 00:02:22,440
that we've seen where these internal federal emails have

69
00:02:22,440 --> 00:02:24,520
been gaining attention, especially since the start

70
00:02:24,520 --> 00:02:27,720
of the Trump administration, especially these emails related

71
00:02:27,720 --> 00:02:30,080
to deferred resignation.

72
00:02:30,080 --> 00:02:31,360
Deferred resignation.

73
00:02:31,360 --> 00:02:32,040
What is that?

74
00:02:32,040 --> 00:02:34,920
It's basically a way for federal employees

75
00:02:34,920 --> 00:02:37,680
to kind of signal that they plan to leave their position,

76
00:02:37,680 --> 00:02:40,080
but they're going to delay their actual departure.

77
00:02:40,080 --> 00:02:42,640
And it's become interesting because a lot of these emails,

78
00:02:42,640 --> 00:02:44,960
which were meant to be internal, of course,

79
00:02:44,960 --> 00:02:46,600
have been leaked or shared publicly.

80
00:02:46,600 --> 00:02:48,520
So it gives us a glimpse into kind of what

81
00:02:48,520 --> 00:02:50,520
was happening within the government under the Trump

82
00:02:50,520 --> 00:02:51,840
administration.

83
00:02:51,840 --> 00:02:55,240
So you've got this new email system, which is basically

84
00:02:55,240 --> 00:02:56,680
a free-for-all.

85
00:02:56,680 --> 00:02:59,680
And then on top of that, you've got these government employees

86
00:02:59,680 --> 00:03:03,240
sending out these deferred resignation emails,

87
00:03:03,240 --> 00:03:06,160
which are then sometimes getting leaked to the public.

88
00:03:06,160 --> 00:03:09,240
It paints a pretty chaotic picture of what's happening.

89
00:03:09,240 --> 00:03:09,720
It does.

90
00:03:09,720 --> 00:03:11,280
It definitely raises a lot of questions

91
00:03:11,280 --> 00:03:15,520
about security and transparency and what exactly was happening

92
00:03:15,520 --> 00:03:17,720
within the federal government at the time.

93
00:03:17,720 --> 00:03:19,560
But maybe we can shift gears a little bit

94
00:03:19,560 --> 00:03:22,200
and talk about another incident that shed some light

95
00:03:22,200 --> 00:03:24,960
on the Trump administration's approach

96
00:03:24,960 --> 00:03:26,640
to technology and personnel.

97
00:03:26,640 --> 00:03:28,440
Do you remember that story about Elon Musk

98
00:03:28,440 --> 00:03:31,240
in the Office of Personnel Management or OPM?

99
00:03:31,240 --> 00:03:32,280
Oh, yeah, I remember that.

100
00:03:32,280 --> 00:03:34,040
That was a big story.

101
00:03:34,040 --> 00:03:35,800
Wasn't there some kind of controversy there

102
00:03:35,800 --> 00:03:38,440
about Elon Musk and his involvement with the OPM?

103
00:03:38,440 --> 00:03:40,360
Yeah, there was definitely some controversy there.

104
00:03:40,360 --> 00:03:43,200
According to a Wired report, Elon Musk basically

105
00:03:43,200 --> 00:03:45,560
was able to replace a lot of the high-level staff

106
00:03:45,560 --> 00:03:49,320
at the OPM with some younger, less experienced individuals

107
00:03:49,320 --> 00:03:50,800
from his own companies.

108
00:03:50,800 --> 00:03:52,440
So just to be clear, we're talking

109
00:03:52,440 --> 00:03:54,520
to the Office of Personnel Management.

110
00:03:54,520 --> 00:03:56,880
That's the agency that's in charge of managing

111
00:03:56,880 --> 00:04:00,680
the entire federal workforce, including NOAA.

112
00:04:00,680 --> 00:04:02,600
That's a pretty important role, wouldn't you say?

113
00:04:02,600 --> 00:04:03,480
Yeah, absolutely.

114
00:04:03,480 --> 00:04:07,040
And one of the major changes that Musk pushed for

115
00:04:07,040 --> 00:04:11,000
was this new in-house email server for OPM.

116
00:04:11,000 --> 00:04:14,720
But the OPM's chief information officer, Melvin Brown,

117
00:04:14,720 --> 00:04:16,960
the second she resisted this change,

118
00:04:16,960 --> 00:04:18,480
citing security concerns.

119
00:04:18,480 --> 00:04:19,320
Yeah.

120
00:04:19,320 --> 00:04:20,400
And of course, he was fired.

121
00:04:20,400 --> 00:04:23,480
Fired for trying to make sure that sensitive information

122
00:04:23,480 --> 00:04:24,520
was secure.

123
00:04:24,520 --> 00:04:25,640
That's not a good sign.

124
00:04:25,640 --> 00:04:26,520
What happened after that?

125
00:04:26,520 --> 00:04:29,160
Did they actually end up implementing that new server?

126
00:04:29,160 --> 00:04:33,360
They did, despite the concerns, and not long after a class

127
00:04:33,360 --> 00:04:36,240
action lawsuit was filed, alleging that the new server

128
00:04:36,240 --> 00:04:39,200
didn't even meet the most basic cybersecurity standards

129
00:04:39,200 --> 00:04:40,880
that were established back in the Bush era.

130
00:04:40,880 --> 00:04:43,280
Wow, so we've got this vulnerable email system

131
00:04:43,280 --> 00:04:45,440
that we know has already been exploited,

132
00:04:45,440 --> 00:04:48,120
some questionable personnel changes at a key agency.

133
00:04:48,120 --> 00:04:51,160
And a complete disregard for established cybersecurity

134
00:04:51,160 --> 00:04:52,320
practices.

135
00:04:52,320 --> 00:04:54,000
Yeah.

136
00:04:54,000 --> 00:04:56,120
It sounds like a recipe for disaster.

137
00:04:56,120 --> 00:04:57,760
What were the implications of all this,

138
00:04:57,760 --> 00:04:59,720
especially for agencies like NOAA?

139
00:04:59,720 --> 00:05:01,000
Well, one of the biggest concerns

140
00:05:01,000 --> 00:05:02,760
was that this insecure server could

141
00:05:02,760 --> 00:05:05,360
be used to gather information on government employees,

142
00:05:05,360 --> 00:05:07,920
potentially even those working at NOAA.

143
00:05:07,920 --> 00:05:09,800
And this fear was kind of heightened when

144
00:05:09,800 --> 00:05:12,440
these fork in the road memos got sent out.

145
00:05:12,440 --> 00:05:15,480
Wait, those memos were sent from that same unsecured server

146
00:05:15,480 --> 00:05:18,760
at OPM, and what were these fork in the road memos anyway?

147
00:05:18,760 --> 00:05:19,760
That's right.

148
00:05:19,760 --> 00:05:21,720
These memos, they were meant to be internal,

149
00:05:21,720 --> 00:05:23,720
but they accidentally revealed the involvement

150
00:05:23,720 --> 00:05:26,480
of these two individuals who were not government employees.

151
00:05:26,480 --> 00:05:27,000
Oh, wow.

152
00:05:27,000 --> 00:05:29,520
But they were heavily involved in this project called Project

153
00:05:29,520 --> 00:05:31,000
2025.

154
00:05:31,000 --> 00:05:33,200
And this project, as we'll talk about later on,

155
00:05:33,200 --> 00:05:35,040
has some pretty significant implications

156
00:05:35,040 --> 00:05:36,840
for the future of the federal workforce,

157
00:05:36,840 --> 00:05:38,240
including those at NOAA.

158
00:05:38,240 --> 00:05:41,080
So we have these email vulnerabilities, personnel

159
00:05:41,080 --> 00:05:43,400
changes, potential data breaches,

160
00:05:43,400 --> 00:05:47,560
and this mysterious Project 2025 looming in the background.

161
00:05:47,560 --> 00:05:49,800
It sounds like the Trump administration's approach

162
00:05:49,800 --> 00:05:52,080
to technology and personnel really

163
00:05:52,080 --> 00:05:54,720
had a ripple effect across the whole entire federal government,

164
00:05:54,720 --> 00:05:56,840
including the world of meteorology.

165
00:05:56,840 --> 00:05:58,520
You hit it right on the head.

166
00:05:58,520 --> 00:06:00,560
These incidents, when you take them all together,

167
00:06:00,560 --> 00:06:02,720
really suggest a pattern of disregard

168
00:06:02,720 --> 00:06:04,880
for established norms and procedures

169
00:06:04,880 --> 00:06:07,440
with potentially serious consequences

170
00:06:07,440 --> 00:06:09,560
for government agencies like NOAA.

171
00:06:09,560 --> 00:06:11,080
This is definitely a lot to unpack.

172
00:06:11,080 --> 00:06:12,920
It seems like we're just scratching the surface

173
00:06:12,920 --> 00:06:14,160
of this whole thing.

174
00:06:14,160 --> 00:06:16,520
But before we get too deep into the weeds here,

175
00:06:16,520 --> 00:06:18,360
maybe we should take a step back and consider

176
00:06:18,360 --> 00:06:20,720
the broader context.

177
00:06:20,720 --> 00:06:24,160
What do these events tell us about the Trump administration's

178
00:06:24,160 --> 00:06:27,640
efforts to try to reshape the federal workforce, especially

179
00:06:27,640 --> 00:06:29,000
within agencies like NOAA?

180
00:06:29,000 --> 00:06:30,040
That's a great question.

181
00:06:30,040 --> 00:06:31,440
And to really understand the answer,

182
00:06:31,440 --> 00:06:35,040
we have to delve into the details of Project 2025

183
00:06:35,040 --> 00:06:37,320
and its potential impact on the very people who

184
00:06:37,320 --> 00:06:39,240
are responsible for forecasting our weather

185
00:06:39,240 --> 00:06:40,560
and protecting our planet.

186
00:06:40,560 --> 00:06:43,840
And that is where things get really interesting

187
00:06:43,840 --> 00:06:45,200
and a little bit concerning.

188
00:06:45,200 --> 00:06:48,120
Let's take a closer look at what this project is all about

189
00:06:48,120 --> 00:06:50,960
and why it's causing so much controversy, especially

190
00:06:50,960 --> 00:06:52,320
within the scientific community.

191
00:06:52,320 --> 00:06:53,200
Yeah.

192
00:06:53,200 --> 00:06:56,160
It really is amazing how all these seemingly unrelated

193
00:06:56,160 --> 00:07:00,120
events can connect to paint a bigger picture.

194
00:07:00,120 --> 00:07:02,840
We started with strange emails at NOAA.

195
00:07:02,840 --> 00:07:04,920
And now we're talking about cybersecurity

196
00:07:04,920 --> 00:07:08,280
and this mysterious Project 2025.

197
00:07:08,280 --> 00:07:10,840
It's like following a trail of digital breadcrumbs.

198
00:07:10,840 --> 00:07:11,480
Yeah.

199
00:07:11,480 --> 00:07:13,320
You start with something that seems small.

200
00:07:13,320 --> 00:07:14,080
Right.

201
00:07:14,080 --> 00:07:15,960
And it just leads to a much bigger story.

202
00:07:15,960 --> 00:07:16,760
Absolutely.

203
00:07:16,760 --> 00:07:18,840
So let's talk about Project 2025.

204
00:07:18,840 --> 00:07:19,480
What is it?

205
00:07:19,480 --> 00:07:21,640
And what are they trying to accomplish?

206
00:07:21,640 --> 00:07:24,320
So basically, Project 2025 is this initiative

207
00:07:24,320 --> 00:07:26,720
that's being led by these conservative think tanks

208
00:07:26,720 --> 00:07:27,840
and advocacy groups.

209
00:07:27,840 --> 00:07:28,400
OK.

210
00:07:28,400 --> 00:07:31,200
And their goal is to fundamentally reshape

211
00:07:31,200 --> 00:07:34,320
the federal government, especially the civil service.

212
00:07:34,320 --> 00:07:35,400
Reshape the federal government.

213
00:07:35,400 --> 00:07:36,600
That sounds like a pretty big goal.

214
00:07:36,600 --> 00:07:37,880
What does that even mean?

215
00:07:37,880 --> 00:07:38,380
Yeah.

216
00:07:38,380 --> 00:07:39,920
What kind of changes are they talking about?

217
00:07:39,920 --> 00:07:41,280
Well, from what we know, it seems

218
00:07:41,280 --> 00:07:44,400
like they want a much smaller, less powerful federal

219
00:07:44,400 --> 00:07:45,600
government.

220
00:07:45,600 --> 00:07:48,760
They want to make deep cuts to social programs,

221
00:07:48,760 --> 00:07:51,600
scale back environmental regulations,

222
00:07:51,600 --> 00:07:54,400
and even reduce funding for scientific research.

223
00:07:54,400 --> 00:07:55,040
Hold on.

224
00:07:55,040 --> 00:07:56,720
They want to cut funding for NOAA.

225
00:07:56,720 --> 00:07:57,000
Yeah.

226
00:07:57,000 --> 00:07:59,920
The agency that's literally on the front lines

227
00:07:59,920 --> 00:08:03,760
of tracking hurricanes and monitoring climate change

228
00:08:03,760 --> 00:08:05,760
and providing crucial weather data.

229
00:08:05,760 --> 00:08:06,920
Right.

230
00:08:06,920 --> 00:08:08,480
That doesn't seem like a good idea,

231
00:08:08,480 --> 00:08:10,480
especially considering the increasing threats we're

232
00:08:10,480 --> 00:08:12,560
facing from extreme weather.

233
00:08:12,560 --> 00:08:14,600
It might seem counterintuitive, but it

234
00:08:14,600 --> 00:08:18,640
does align with their ideology of shrinking the government's

235
00:08:18,640 --> 00:08:22,200
role in areas that they see as unnecessary or even harmful.

236
00:08:22,200 --> 00:08:22,680
Right.

237
00:08:22,680 --> 00:08:26,280
Project 2025 is really about dismantling or privatizing

238
00:08:26,280 --> 00:08:28,760
a lot of government functions, including those that

239
00:08:28,760 --> 00:08:30,240
have to do with scientific research

240
00:08:30,240 --> 00:08:31,680
and environmental protection.

241
00:08:31,680 --> 00:08:33,440
So it's not just about budget cuts.

242
00:08:33,440 --> 00:08:33,960
No.

243
00:08:33,960 --> 00:08:37,240
It's about completely changing the role of government

244
00:08:37,240 --> 00:08:39,560
when it comes to things like science and environmental

245
00:08:39,560 --> 00:08:40,040
protection.

246
00:08:40,040 --> 00:08:40,400
Yes.

247
00:08:40,400 --> 00:08:43,000
What does that mean for the people who actually work at NOAA?

248
00:08:43,000 --> 00:08:45,960
Well, one of the most concerning things about Project 2025

249
00:08:45,960 --> 00:08:48,960
is their focus on replacing career civil servants

250
00:08:48,960 --> 00:08:51,720
with people who agree with their ideology.

251
00:08:51,720 --> 00:08:55,280
And that could mean sidelining experienced scientists

252
00:08:55,280 --> 00:08:58,400
and researchers and bringing in people who might not

253
00:08:58,400 --> 00:08:59,640
have the right expertise.

254
00:08:59,640 --> 00:09:02,040
So you're saying it's ideology over experience.

255
00:09:02,040 --> 00:09:03,000
Yeah.

256
00:09:03,000 --> 00:09:04,520
That's a scary thought, especially when

257
00:09:04,520 --> 00:09:06,440
we're talking about something as important as weather

258
00:09:06,440 --> 00:09:09,680
forecasting and climate research that could really

259
00:09:09,680 --> 00:09:11,480
hurt the scientific community at NOAA.

260
00:09:11,480 --> 00:09:11,960
Yeah.

261
00:09:11,960 --> 00:09:13,400
That's a valid concern.

262
00:09:13,400 --> 00:09:15,160
If scientists and researchers feel

263
00:09:15,160 --> 00:09:16,920
like their work is being undermined

264
00:09:16,920 --> 00:09:21,240
or their expertise isn't valued, it could really lower morale

265
00:09:21,240 --> 00:09:23,200
and potentially prevent them from doing their jobs

266
00:09:23,200 --> 00:09:23,920
effectively.

267
00:09:23,920 --> 00:09:26,080
And that's not even taking into account the impact

268
00:09:26,080 --> 00:09:27,040
on public safety.

269
00:09:27,040 --> 00:09:29,840
We're having accurate weather forecasting and climate modeling

270
00:09:29,840 --> 00:09:32,640
is essential for protecting lives and property.

271
00:09:32,640 --> 00:09:33,720
Absolutely.

272
00:09:33,720 --> 00:09:35,880
Undermining NOAA's work could have consequences

273
00:09:35,880 --> 00:09:38,640
that reach far beyond the agency itself.

274
00:09:38,640 --> 00:09:40,320
It could affect the whole country.

275
00:09:40,320 --> 00:09:42,920
And it seems like the Trump administration was using Project

276
00:09:42,920 --> 00:09:45,960
2025 as a guide for their actions, especially

277
00:09:45,960 --> 00:09:47,920
those personnel changes at OPM.

278
00:09:47,920 --> 00:09:50,920
And that push for a new email server.

279
00:09:50,920 --> 00:09:52,480
It's all starting to come together now.

280
00:09:52,480 --> 00:09:55,520
The email vulnerabilities, the strange personnel changes.

281
00:09:55,520 --> 00:09:59,080
Let's fork in the road memos and now this Project 2025.

282
00:09:59,080 --> 00:10:01,320
It feels like there was a deliberate effort

283
00:10:01,320 --> 00:10:04,880
to reshape the federal government, including NOAA,

284
00:10:04,880 --> 00:10:07,920
in a way that fits a very specific ideology.

285
00:10:07,920 --> 00:10:11,320
And it seems like they were willing to compromise security

286
00:10:11,320 --> 00:10:14,920
and maybe even jeopardize vital scientific research to do it.

287
00:10:14,920 --> 00:10:16,480
You're putting all the pieces together.

288
00:10:16,480 --> 00:10:19,440
It really makes you wonder about the role of ideology

289
00:10:19,440 --> 00:10:22,720
in shaping government policy and whether prioritizing

290
00:10:22,720 --> 00:10:25,840
political gen-was over scientific expertise

291
00:10:25,840 --> 00:10:28,200
and well-established procedures is a good idea.

292
00:10:28,200 --> 00:10:29,280
It's a sobering thought.

293
00:10:29,280 --> 00:10:31,280
We can't just sit here and worry about it, though, can we?

294
00:10:31,280 --> 00:10:33,160
What can we do to fight back against this?

295
00:10:33,160 --> 00:10:36,600
What can people do to protect NOAA and other government

296
00:10:36,600 --> 00:10:39,720
agencies from these potentially harmful changes?

297
00:10:39,720 --> 00:10:43,200
It's a tough challenge, but there are some things we can do.

298
00:10:43,200 --> 00:10:45,200
The most important thing is to raise awareness

299
00:10:45,200 --> 00:10:49,400
about Project 2025 and its potential impact on the government

300
00:10:49,400 --> 00:10:50,680
and on our lives.

301
00:10:50,680 --> 00:10:53,440
So it's all about educating ourselves and others

302
00:10:53,440 --> 00:10:54,920
about what's going on.

303
00:10:54,920 --> 00:10:57,120
We can't fight something if we don't understand it.

304
00:10:57,120 --> 00:10:58,000
Exactly.

305
00:10:58,000 --> 00:11:02,400
We need to really understand the details of Project 2025.

306
00:11:02,400 --> 00:11:03,920
What are their goals?

307
00:11:03,920 --> 00:11:05,000
What are their methods?

308
00:11:05,000 --> 00:11:07,120
And what could the consequences be?

309
00:11:07,120 --> 00:11:10,680
Once we understand that, then we can start to effectively

310
00:11:10,680 --> 00:11:12,280
counter their influence.

311
00:11:12,280 --> 00:11:15,040
And once we understand it, we can start speaking out

312
00:11:15,040 --> 00:11:15,680
against it, right?

313
00:11:15,680 --> 00:11:16,280
Yes.

314
00:11:16,280 --> 00:11:18,640
Contact our elected officials, talk to our communities

315
00:11:18,640 --> 00:11:21,440
about it, and use our voices to try to make a change.

316
00:11:21,440 --> 00:11:22,680
Exactly.

317
00:11:22,680 --> 00:11:25,360
We need to hold our elected officials accountable.

318
00:11:25,360 --> 00:11:25,680
Yes.

319
00:11:25,680 --> 00:11:28,600
And demand that they protect our government institutions

320
00:11:28,600 --> 00:11:31,480
from these partisan agendas that could make them less effective.

321
00:11:31,480 --> 00:11:34,520
It's about reminding them that these agencies like NELA

322
00:11:34,520 --> 00:11:35,880
are supposed to serve the public.

323
00:11:35,880 --> 00:11:36,600
Yes.

324
00:11:36,600 --> 00:11:38,760
Not a specific political party.

325
00:11:38,760 --> 00:11:41,440
Their focus should be on protecting people, not

326
00:11:41,440 --> 00:11:43,680
advancing political agendas.

327
00:11:43,680 --> 00:11:44,800
Exactly.

328
00:11:44,800 --> 00:11:46,880
And we can also support organizations

329
00:11:46,880 --> 00:11:50,280
that are fighting to protect scientific integrity

330
00:11:50,280 --> 00:11:52,400
and the work that government agencies do.

331
00:11:52,400 --> 00:11:55,880
So donating to organizations that support

332
00:11:55,880 --> 00:11:58,640
science-based policymaking, supporting groups

333
00:11:58,640 --> 00:12:00,920
that are monitoring what the government's doing

334
00:12:00,920 --> 00:12:03,640
and amplifying the voices of scientists and researchers who

335
00:12:03,640 --> 00:12:05,840
are speaking out against these changes.

336
00:12:05,840 --> 00:12:06,720
You got it.

337
00:12:06,720 --> 00:12:09,400
It's about using our collective voice and our resources

338
00:12:09,400 --> 00:12:12,560
to push back against these changes that could be harmful

339
00:12:12,560 --> 00:12:15,280
and protect the institutions that are so important

340
00:12:15,280 --> 00:12:16,200
for our well-being.

341
00:12:16,200 --> 00:12:16,720
Yeah.

342
00:12:16,720 --> 00:12:18,560
And remember, this isn't just about NOAA.

343
00:12:18,560 --> 00:12:18,760
Right.

344
00:12:18,760 --> 00:12:21,240
It's about protecting all federal employees

345
00:12:21,240 --> 00:12:24,440
and making sure our government serves the needs of the people,

346
00:12:24,440 --> 00:12:26,880
not the whims of a particular political party.

347
00:12:26,880 --> 00:12:28,440
It's a fight worth having.

348
00:12:28,440 --> 00:12:30,320
And it reminds us that we as citizens

349
00:12:30,320 --> 00:12:33,240
have a role to play in shaping the future of our government.

350
00:12:33,240 --> 00:12:36,000
We can't just sit back and hope everything turns out OK.

351
00:12:36,000 --> 00:12:39,080
We have to be informed and engaged and active

352
00:12:39,080 --> 00:12:40,720
in defending the institutions that

353
00:12:40,720 --> 00:12:43,560
are vital for our democracy and our future.

354
00:12:43,560 --> 00:12:45,600
So we've been talking about Project 2025

355
00:12:45,600 --> 00:12:48,480
and this whole idea of reshaping the federal government.

356
00:12:48,480 --> 00:12:50,720
But it's not just like a bunch of abstract ideas

357
00:12:50,720 --> 00:12:54,400
where this project actually has a plan for how they want to do it.

358
00:12:54,400 --> 00:12:55,280
Yeah, absolutely.

359
00:12:55,280 --> 00:12:57,920
They have this whole roadmap for how

360
00:12:57,920 --> 00:13:00,880
they want to dismantle or privatize different parts

361
00:13:00,880 --> 00:13:01,520
of the government.

362
00:13:01,520 --> 00:13:04,200
And it's all written out in these policy papers

363
00:13:04,200 --> 00:13:05,560
and strategic documents.

364
00:13:05,560 --> 00:13:06,520
So they're not just taught.

365
00:13:06,520 --> 00:13:08,440
They actually have a plan to make it happen.

366
00:13:08,440 --> 00:13:09,480
That's kind of scary.

367
00:13:09,480 --> 00:13:12,200
Can you give us some examples of what they're actually proposing?

368
00:13:12,200 --> 00:13:15,160
What would a government that's been shaped by this Project

369
00:13:15,160 --> 00:13:17,320
2025 actually look like?

370
00:13:17,320 --> 00:13:19,760
Well, one of the big things is they want to make major cuts

371
00:13:19,760 --> 00:13:23,120
to social programs like Medicare and Social Security.

372
00:13:23,120 --> 00:13:25,880
They say these programs are too expensive and not efficient

373
00:13:25,880 --> 00:13:26,480
enough.

374
00:13:26,480 --> 00:13:29,040
Wait, they want to cut Medicare and Social Security.

375
00:13:29,040 --> 00:13:32,360
Those programs are so important for so many people.

376
00:13:32,360 --> 00:13:33,200
Yeah.

377
00:13:33,200 --> 00:13:34,280
That just seems crazy.

378
00:13:34,280 --> 00:13:35,840
What else are they going after?

379
00:13:35,840 --> 00:13:38,440
They also want to roll back environmental regulations,

380
00:13:38,440 --> 00:13:41,280
you know, the protections that keep our air and water clean.

381
00:13:41,280 --> 00:13:41,760
OK.

382
00:13:41,760 --> 00:13:44,040
They say these regulations are bad for businesses

383
00:13:44,040 --> 00:13:45,920
and that they're based on bad science.

384
00:13:45,920 --> 00:13:48,720
So they're not only going after social safety nets,

385
00:13:48,720 --> 00:13:52,000
but they're also targeting environmental protections.

386
00:13:52,000 --> 00:13:54,760
It feels like they care more about businesses

387
00:13:54,760 --> 00:13:57,000
than they do about people and the planet.

388
00:13:57,000 --> 00:13:59,040
Yeah, I can see why you'd say that.

389
00:13:59,040 --> 00:14:02,160
And what they want to do to NOAA is especially worrying.

390
00:14:02,160 --> 00:14:04,280
They want to slash the agency's budget

391
00:14:04,280 --> 00:14:05,880
and limit what they do.

392
00:14:05,880 --> 00:14:08,280
Basically, they're trying to stop them from monitoring

393
00:14:08,280 --> 00:14:10,840
climate change, predicting extreme weather,

394
00:14:10,840 --> 00:14:12,400
and protecting our oceans.

395
00:14:12,400 --> 00:14:14,960
So they're trying to weaken the very agency that's

396
00:14:14,960 --> 00:14:18,320
supposed to be keeping us safe from climate change.

397
00:14:18,320 --> 00:14:20,520
That just seems so backwards and dangerous,

398
00:14:20,520 --> 00:14:22,960
especially with all the hurricanes and floods

399
00:14:22,960 --> 00:14:26,160
and wildfires that are happening more and more these days.

400
00:14:26,160 --> 00:14:28,080
It's definitely a risky move.

401
00:14:28,080 --> 00:14:30,600
They're basically gambling that we can just

402
00:14:30,600 --> 00:14:32,160
ignore what the scientists are saying

403
00:14:32,160 --> 00:14:34,760
and that climate change won't be as bad as they're predicting.

404
00:14:34,760 --> 00:14:36,040
And what if they're wrong?

405
00:14:36,040 --> 00:14:37,960
What if it's even worse than we think?

406
00:14:37,960 --> 00:14:39,560
It's like they're playing with fire

407
00:14:39,560 --> 00:14:41,120
when it comes to the future of the planet.

408
00:14:41,120 --> 00:14:42,760
Yeah, it's a scary thought.

409
00:14:42,760 --> 00:14:44,480
And it's not even just about the environment.

410
00:14:44,480 --> 00:14:48,680
Project 2025 also wants to reduce funding for scientific research

411
00:14:48,680 --> 00:14:49,920
in general.

412
00:14:49,920 --> 00:14:52,680
They're going after agencies like the National Institutes

413
00:14:52,680 --> 00:14:55,560
of Health and the National Science Foundation.

414
00:14:55,560 --> 00:14:57,920
So basically, they want to stop scientific progress

415
00:14:57,920 --> 00:14:58,880
in all areas.

416
00:14:58,880 --> 00:15:01,240
That's a really dangerous path to take.

417
00:15:01,240 --> 00:15:03,760
Scientific research is how we make new discoveries

418
00:15:03,760 --> 00:15:05,400
and solve problems.

419
00:15:05,400 --> 00:15:08,840
It's essential for dealing with all sorts of challenges,

420
00:15:08,840 --> 00:15:12,280
from climate change to pandemics to national security.

421
00:15:12,280 --> 00:15:14,280
Yeah, it really shows a misunderstanding

422
00:15:14,280 --> 00:15:16,400
of the role that science plays in society.

423
00:15:16,400 --> 00:15:18,240
Science isn't just about learning things.

424
00:15:18,240 --> 00:15:21,400
It's about solving problems, making people's lives better

425
00:15:21,400 --> 00:15:22,920
and creating a better future.

426
00:15:22,920 --> 00:15:23,440
Exactly.

427
00:15:23,440 --> 00:15:25,160
And when they undermine scientific research,

428
00:15:25,160 --> 00:15:28,720
they're basically taking away our ability to do those things.

429
00:15:28,720 --> 00:15:31,840
It's a recipe for things to get worse, not better.

430
00:15:31,840 --> 00:15:34,560
Yeah, it's definitely a worrying trend.

431
00:15:34,560 --> 00:15:36,560
And it's not only happening in the US either.

432
00:15:36,560 --> 00:15:39,720
We're seeing similar attacks on science and experts

433
00:15:39,720 --> 00:15:41,160
all over the world.

434
00:15:41,160 --> 00:15:42,720
So what can we do about this?

435
00:15:42,720 --> 00:15:46,040
How do we fight back against all this anti-science sentiment

436
00:15:46,040 --> 00:15:48,840
and protect the role that science plays in our society?

437
00:15:48,840 --> 00:15:51,200
Well, the first thing is we have to stand up for science.

438
00:15:51,200 --> 00:15:53,560
We have to celebrate what science has accomplished,

439
00:15:53,560 --> 00:15:55,360
teach ourselves and others about why

440
00:15:55,360 --> 00:15:58,240
scientific research is important, and challenge anyone

441
00:15:58,240 --> 00:15:59,640
who tries to undermine it.

442
00:15:59,640 --> 00:16:02,200
So it's about being vocal supporters of science.

443
00:16:02,200 --> 00:16:04,480
We have to speak out against misinformation,

444
00:16:04,480 --> 00:16:07,600
support science education, and push for policies that

445
00:16:07,600 --> 00:16:08,720
are based on evidence.

446
00:16:08,720 --> 00:16:09,880
Exactly.

447
00:16:09,880 --> 00:16:12,960
We have to make it clear that science isn't about politics.

448
00:16:12,960 --> 00:16:16,080
It's about using reason, evidence, and critical thinking

449
00:16:16,080 --> 00:16:18,200
to understand the world and solve problems.

450
00:16:18,200 --> 00:16:21,600
It's about making sure that our decisions based on facts,

451
00:16:21,600 --> 00:16:24,960
not on ideology or what's politically convenient.

452
00:16:24,960 --> 00:16:25,800
Exactly.

453
00:16:25,800 --> 00:16:28,360
And we have to hold our elected officials accountable.

454
00:16:28,360 --> 00:16:30,720
We need to make sure they support scientific research,

455
00:16:30,720 --> 00:16:32,480
that they listen to what the experts are saying,

456
00:16:32,480 --> 00:16:33,800
and that they make decisions that

457
00:16:33,800 --> 00:16:36,520
are in the best interests of the public and the planet.

458
00:16:36,520 --> 00:16:38,920
That means voting for candidates who value

459
00:16:38,920 --> 00:16:41,760
science and evidence, talking to our representatives

460
00:16:41,760 --> 00:16:44,440
about our concerns, and advocating for policies that

461
00:16:44,440 --> 00:16:46,520
prioritize scientific integrity.

462
00:16:46,520 --> 00:16:47,640
Exactly.

463
00:16:47,640 --> 00:16:50,200
It's about being active citizens, making sure

464
00:16:50,200 --> 00:16:53,120
science has a voice, and working to create a society that

465
00:16:53,120 --> 00:16:55,920
values knowledge, reason, and progress.

466
00:16:55,920 --> 00:16:58,200
It's a fight that's worth fighting.

467
00:16:58,200 --> 00:17:01,160
And it reminds us that the future isn't set in stone.

468
00:17:01,160 --> 00:17:03,760
It's shaped by the choices we make today.

469
00:17:03,760 --> 00:17:05,360
And if we choose to support science

470
00:17:05,360 --> 00:17:07,960
and make decisions based on evidence and demand

471
00:17:07,960 --> 00:17:10,480
that our leaders care about the long-term well-being

472
00:17:10,480 --> 00:17:12,680
of our planet and its people, then we

473
00:17:12,680 --> 00:17:14,880
can create a future where science is guiding us

474
00:17:14,880 --> 00:17:16,680
towards a brighter tomorrow.

475
00:17:16,680 --> 00:17:17,400
I like that.

476
00:17:17,400 --> 00:17:19,200
That's a great point to end on.

477
00:17:19,200 --> 00:17:21,560
Remember, the pursuit of knowledge never ends.

478
00:17:21,560 --> 00:17:25,240
Stay curious, stay informed, and never stop asking questions.

479
00:17:25,240 --> 00:17:27,120
Thanks for joining us on this look

480
00:17:27,120 --> 00:17:29,000
at the intersection of politics, technology,

481
00:17:29,000 --> 00:17:30,600
and the future of science.

482
00:17:30,600 --> 00:17:33,200
Until next time, keep exploring, keep learning,

483
00:17:33,200 --> 00:17:38,160
and keep those questions coming.

