WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:04.320
Imagine spending two decades climbing to the

00:00:04.320 --> 00:00:07.960
absolute peak. of the corporate IT world. You

00:00:07.960 --> 00:00:11.099
have built this absolutely flawless resume. Right.

00:00:11.099 --> 00:00:12.939
You're at the very top of your game. Exactly.

00:00:13.320 --> 00:00:16.600
You are the global CIO of a multi -billion dollar

00:00:16.600 --> 00:00:19.940
company. You're at a major industry event. You're

00:00:19.940 --> 00:00:23.320
about to walk on stage to give a keynote address

00:00:23.320 --> 00:00:26.739
to a room full of your peers. And someone just

00:00:26.739 --> 00:00:28.640
walks up and hands you their valet keys. I mean,

00:00:28.640 --> 00:00:30.739
it's just a jarring image. But the crazy thing

00:00:30.739 --> 00:00:34.100
is, it is a completely real scenario. Yeah, it

00:00:34.100 --> 00:00:36.039
really happened. And today we're looking at how

00:00:36.039 --> 00:00:39.439
the world's top executives take moments of profound

00:00:39.439 --> 00:00:41.719
exclusion exactly like that one and actually

00:00:41.719 --> 00:00:44.579
reverse engineer them into multi -billion dollar

00:00:44.579 --> 00:00:46.520
product innovations. It's such a powerful pivot.

00:00:46.659 --> 00:00:49.179
It really is. So welcome to today's Deep Dive.

00:00:49.280 --> 00:00:50.700
If you're listening to this, you are probably

00:00:50.700 --> 00:00:53.579
trying to cut through the endless corporate buzzwords

00:00:53.579 --> 00:00:55.340
surrounding diversity, equity, and inclusion.

00:00:55.560 --> 00:00:58.479
All the acronyms. There's so many acronyms. Right.

00:00:58.740 --> 00:01:01.520
We all hear them. But what does the actual machinery

00:01:01.520 --> 00:01:04.140
of inclusion look like when it's operating at

00:01:04.140 --> 00:01:07.099
the highest possible level? That's our mission

00:01:07.099 --> 00:01:09.939
today. We are looking at how C -suite executives

00:01:09.939 --> 00:01:13.500
operationalize this for real world impact. And

00:01:13.500 --> 00:01:15.599
the source material we're diving into is just

00:01:15.599 --> 00:01:19.159
a phenomenal resource for exactly that. It's

00:01:19.159 --> 00:01:21.359
a panel discussion from the Women in Tech Network.

00:01:21.480 --> 00:01:23.680
Yeah, moderated by Annette White -Klososki, right?

00:01:23.819 --> 00:01:26.540
Exactly. And she sits down with three absolute

00:01:26.540 --> 00:01:29.200
heavy hitters. You've got Ron Garrier, the global

00:01:29.200 --> 00:01:32.180
CIO at HP. You've got Leanne Hornsey, who's the

00:01:32.180 --> 00:01:34.959
chief people officer at Palo Alto Networks, and

00:01:34.959 --> 00:01:37.640
Graciela Perez, the VP and chief digital program

00:01:37.640 --> 00:01:40.019
officer at GE Healthcare. So we are talking about

00:01:40.019 --> 00:01:42.819
leaders who manage massive global workforces.

00:01:42.840 --> 00:01:45.859
Oh, yeah. And budgets that honestly rival...

00:01:45.900 --> 00:01:48.400
the GDP of small countries. OK, so let's unpack

00:01:48.400 --> 00:01:50.340
this, because today is all about moving from

00:01:50.340 --> 00:01:52.379
theory to practice. We're going to see how the

00:01:52.379 --> 00:01:54.620
mechanics of inclusion change, like literally

00:01:54.620 --> 00:01:56.739
everything, right down to the physical products

00:01:56.739 --> 00:01:59.159
we buy and the way we combat burnout. Which is

00:01:59.159 --> 00:02:02.060
huge for anyone in the workforce right now. Absolutely.

00:02:02.519 --> 00:02:06.140
But to understand how these leaders shape those

00:02:06.140 --> 00:02:09.319
massive corporate policies, we first have to

00:02:09.319 --> 00:02:11.860
start somewhere incredibly personal. We have

00:02:11.860 --> 00:02:14.819
to look at the painful lived experiences that

00:02:14.909 --> 00:02:16.849
you know, forge their perspectives in the first

00:02:16.849 --> 00:02:19.289
place. Right, because high -level policies don't

00:02:19.289 --> 00:02:21.990
just materialize out of thin air. They're almost

00:02:21.990 --> 00:02:25.090
always born from a highly specific lived experience,

00:02:25.250 --> 00:02:27.870
which brings us back to that opening scenario.

00:02:27.969 --> 00:02:30.810
Yeah, that valet key story. In this panel, Ron

00:02:30.810 --> 00:02:33.330
Garrier shares that exact story. I mean, he's

00:02:33.330 --> 00:02:35.889
a highly successful executive with 25 years in

00:02:35.889 --> 00:02:38.129
IT. And he is the one giving the keynote. Exactly.

00:02:38.150 --> 00:02:40.629
And he recounts these moments where even as a

00:02:40.629 --> 00:02:43.949
sitting CIO, attendees would just assume he was

00:02:43.949 --> 00:02:45.960
the coffee. Or they'd hand him the keys to park

00:02:45.960 --> 00:02:48.939
their car. He even mentions two specific cases

00:02:48.939 --> 00:02:50.919
where security was actually called on him at

00:02:50.919 --> 00:02:53.120
events. Wow. Yeah, because people assumed he

00:02:53.120 --> 00:02:54.719
was just wandering around trying to get free

00:02:54.719 --> 00:02:57.360
food. That is just staggering. But, you know,

00:02:57.360 --> 00:03:01.139
what is truly fascinating here is how these early

00:03:01.139 --> 00:03:04.099
feelings of being an outsider naturally evolve

00:03:04.099 --> 00:03:07.120
into this lifelong drive to address broader systemic

00:03:07.120 --> 00:03:09.800
inequalities. Right, because when someone hands

00:03:09.800 --> 00:03:12.620
Ron their valet keys, he doesn't react poorly.

00:03:12.659 --> 00:03:14.340
He doesn't, like, throw... the keys into the

00:03:14.340 --> 00:03:17.639
bushes. Which, frankly, many of us might be tempted

00:03:17.639 --> 00:03:20.319
to do. Oh, absolutely. I would be furious. But

00:03:20.319 --> 00:03:22.979
instead, he uses it as a mechanical intervention.

00:03:23.219 --> 00:03:26.289
How so? He stops, he looks at them, and he just

00:03:26.289 --> 00:03:28.629
says, no, I happen to be a peer of yours. I'm

00:03:28.629 --> 00:03:30.490
going on stage in 10 minutes. I hope you enjoy

00:03:30.490 --> 00:03:33.430
the talk. Oh, that's brilliant. Right. He intercepts

00:03:33.430 --> 00:03:36.009
their bias and turns it into an educational moment

00:03:36.009 --> 00:03:38.770
right there on the spot. He takes that profound

00:03:38.770 --> 00:03:42.229
feeling of being marginalized and he operationalizes

00:03:42.229 --> 00:03:44.689
it. He builds a bridge instead of a wall. Exactly.

00:03:44.969 --> 00:03:47.650
And the panel doesn't just focus on race or gender

00:03:47.650 --> 00:03:50.169
in this regard. Like, Leigh Ann Hornsey shares

00:03:50.169 --> 00:03:53.349
a very different but mechanically similar experience.

00:03:53.229 --> 00:03:56.289
of being an outsider. Yes, so Leanne grew up

00:03:56.289 --> 00:03:58.770
in a working -class family in the UK. She is

00:03:58.770 --> 00:04:00.689
white, but she points out that she's Irish and

00:04:00.689 --> 00:04:03.889
Catholic, which in her specific environment was

00:04:03.889 --> 00:04:06.129
not a thing that blended in easily at all. Because

00:04:06.129 --> 00:04:08.169
she was a very bright kid, so she got sent to

00:04:08.169 --> 00:04:10.349
a school for other high -performing children.

00:04:10.750 --> 00:04:13.069
Right, but she didn't have the money, she didn't

00:04:13.069 --> 00:04:15.349
have the proper uniform, and she had what she

00:04:15.349 --> 00:04:18.350
called an appalling working -class accent compared

00:04:18.350 --> 00:04:21.350
to her... you know, affluent peers. And the lengths

00:04:21.350 --> 00:04:23.910
she went to just to survive in that environment

00:04:23.910 --> 00:04:26.730
are incredible. Like, at 11 years old, she spent

00:04:26.730 --> 00:04:30.350
18 grueling months taking elocution lessons.

00:04:30.670 --> 00:04:34.600
Wow. 18 months. Yeah. 18 months of actively trying

00:04:34.600 --> 00:04:37.319
to erase her accent and permanently alter her

00:04:37.319 --> 00:04:39.560
voice just to sound like the majority. And the

00:04:39.560 --> 00:04:42.319
realization she takes from that is just foundational

00:04:42.319 --> 00:04:44.699
to her work as a chief people officer. Yeah.

00:04:44.839 --> 00:04:47.439
Because she realized she was physically capable

00:04:47.439 --> 00:04:50.019
of changing her voice, right? She could successfully

00:04:50.019 --> 00:04:52.620
emulate the majority. Right. But it took massive

00:04:52.620 --> 00:04:55.019
effort. Exactly. And she points out that many

00:04:55.019 --> 00:04:57.279
people, people of color, people with different

00:04:57.279 --> 00:04:59.879
genders or different physical abilities, they

00:04:59.879 --> 00:05:01.860
cannot simply change their physical appearance

00:05:01.860 --> 00:05:04.939
to blend in like that. To put this in tech terms,

00:05:04.980 --> 00:05:06.680
since we're talking about IT executives here,

00:05:06.860 --> 00:05:08.600
it's like running a background operating system

00:05:08.600 --> 00:05:12.480
that eats up, say, 40 % of your CPU just to maintain

00:05:12.480 --> 00:05:14.980
a fake user interface. This is such a good analogy.

00:05:15.209 --> 00:05:17.970
Right. Because if you are using almost half your

00:05:17.970 --> 00:05:19.970
brain power just trying to sound, look, and act

00:05:19.970 --> 00:05:22.470
like the majority, you only have 60 % of your

00:05:22.470 --> 00:05:25.089
energy left to actually do your job. Yeah, that

00:05:25.089 --> 00:05:28.009
CPU drain is real. If an employee's processing

00:05:28.009 --> 00:05:31.069
power is drained by emulation, they aren't using

00:05:31.069 --> 00:05:34.209
that energy to innovate. Leanne's ultimate thesis

00:05:34.209 --> 00:05:36.670
is that forcing people to emulate the majority

00:05:36.670 --> 00:05:39.910
is just an exhausting burden that entirely saps

00:05:39.910 --> 00:05:42.810
human energy. which naturally shifts the conversation

00:05:42.810 --> 00:05:45.550
from how empathy feels on an individual level

00:05:45.550 --> 00:05:48.990
to how empathy literally builds things on a corporate

00:05:48.990 --> 00:05:50.949
level. And this is where I really want to push

00:05:50.949 --> 00:05:54.350
back on the kind of cynical view of this topic,

00:05:54.649 --> 00:05:57.430
because a lot of people view DEI as just an HR

00:05:57.430 --> 00:05:59.230
initiative. Like a training module you click

00:05:59.230 --> 00:06:01.550
through once a year. Exactly. But here's where

00:06:01.550 --> 00:06:04.230
it gets really interesting. Does having diverse

00:06:04.230 --> 00:06:06.949
perspectives in a company actually change the

00:06:06.949 --> 00:06:09.910
physical, tangible products that a multi -billion

00:06:09.910 --> 00:06:12.310
dollar company manufactures? If we connect this

00:06:12.310 --> 00:06:15.689
to the bigger picture, Graciela Perez from GE

00:06:15.689 --> 00:06:18.410
Healthcare provides an absolute master class

00:06:18.410 --> 00:06:20.790
on exactly how it does. She brings up a really

00:06:20.790 --> 00:06:24.050
striking data point, doesn't she? She does. She

00:06:24.050 --> 00:06:26.230
notes that over 70 % of healthcare providers

00:06:26.230 --> 00:06:29.230
are women. Yet historically, the technology they

00:06:29.230 --> 00:06:31.720
use hasn't always been built with them. or their

00:06:31.720 --> 00:06:35.040
patients in mind. Right. And she talks about

00:06:35.040 --> 00:06:37.120
this concept in artificial intelligence called

00:06:37.120 --> 00:06:39.560
data artifacts. Now, I've heard that term thrown

00:06:39.560 --> 00:06:41.819
around in text circles, but like, what does it

00:06:41.819 --> 00:06:44.079
actually mean in the context of building a product?

00:06:44.360 --> 00:06:47.639
Is an artifact just a bug in the code? Not exactly.

00:06:48.819 --> 00:06:52.000
Think of an artifact as a historical bias frozen

00:06:52.000 --> 00:06:54.939
in data. Okay. Frozen how? Well, let's say a

00:06:54.939 --> 00:06:57.639
development team is training an AI model to detect

00:06:57.639 --> 00:07:00.459
anomalies in medical scans. If the historical

00:07:00.459 --> 00:07:03.100
data they feed into that AI comes from a demographic

00:07:03.100 --> 00:07:06.120
that leans, say, 80 % male in Caucasian. The

00:07:06.120 --> 00:07:08.899
algorithm just mathematically optimizes for that

00:07:08.899 --> 00:07:11.680
specific reality. Exactly. It treats that male

00:07:11.680 --> 00:07:14.560
anatomy as the absolute baseline. The AI doesn't

00:07:14.560 --> 00:07:16.759
know it's biased. It's just calculating based

00:07:16.759 --> 00:07:19.149
on the only worldview it was ever given. So if

00:07:19.149 --> 00:07:21.350
the engineering team all looks the same and they

00:07:21.350 --> 00:07:23.550
all have the same lived experience, they might

00:07:23.550 --> 00:07:25.730
not even realize the data is skewed in the first

00:07:25.730 --> 00:07:28.649
place. Right. The product literally inherits

00:07:28.649 --> 00:07:31.629
the blind spots of its creators. That is terrifying

00:07:31.629 --> 00:07:33.589
when you're talking about medical AI. It really

00:07:33.589 --> 00:07:36.250
is. And Graciela points out that this goes far

00:07:36.250 --> 00:07:39.310
beyond just software and algorithms. It dictates

00:07:39.310 --> 00:07:41.089
the physical manufacturing of hardware, too.

00:07:41.189 --> 00:07:44.370
Oh, like the MRI machines. Yes. She uses this

00:07:44.370 --> 00:07:47.949
incredible example of magnetic resonance imaging.

00:07:48.189 --> 00:07:51.230
GE actually went back and physically changed

00:07:51.230 --> 00:07:54.610
the engineering of their newer MRI machines to

00:07:54.610 --> 00:07:58.410
increase the opening space, the bore of the machine.

00:07:58.529 --> 00:08:00.709
Because as she so perfectly put it, people don't

00:08:00.709 --> 00:08:03.269
come in one size. Precisely. The original dimensions

00:08:03.269 --> 00:08:05.870
were largely based on a specific historical standard

00:08:05.870 --> 00:08:08.279
of the human body. which really excluded a lot

00:08:08.279 --> 00:08:10.800
of people. Absolutely. So by widening that space,

00:08:10.939 --> 00:08:13.480
they reduce patient claustrophobia, they accommodate

00:08:13.480 --> 00:08:15.480
different body types, and they actually change

00:08:15.480 --> 00:08:18.180
the entire diagnostic experience. But here is

00:08:18.180 --> 00:08:20.480
the mechanical hurdle Graciela highlights right.

00:08:21.000 --> 00:08:22.860
You can have all the data in the world suggesting

00:08:22.860 --> 00:08:25.920
you need a wider MRI machine, but it takes diverse

00:08:25.920 --> 00:08:28.339
people actually embedded within the design team

00:08:28.339 --> 00:08:31.540
to spot the flaw. And to champion the redesign.

00:08:32.299 --> 00:08:35.179
Because changing hardware is not cheap. No, not

00:08:35.179 --> 00:08:38.120
at all. And crucially, it takes a diverse C -suite

00:08:38.120 --> 00:08:41.120
to actually sign the checks. The executives holding

00:08:41.120 --> 00:08:43.679
the budget have to understand the why behind

00:08:43.679 --> 00:08:46.519
the redesign, or the inclusive idea never makes

00:08:46.519 --> 00:08:48.580
it off the whiteboard. It just dies in committee.

00:08:48.919 --> 00:08:51.659
Exactly. If you're managing a team right now,

00:08:51.700 --> 00:08:54.720
it makes you ask yourself, like, how many metaphorical

00:08:54.720 --> 00:08:57.399
MRI machines is your team building with blind

00:08:57.399 --> 00:09:00.360
spots simply because you haven't given the budget

00:09:00.360 --> 00:09:03.080
pen to a diverse voice? Which brings up a massive

00:09:03.080 --> 00:09:05.759
logistical challenge. Let's say a company understands

00:09:05.759 --> 00:09:08.259
this, right? They know diverse perspectives are

00:09:08.259 --> 00:09:10.940
an absolute requirement to avoid engineering

00:09:10.940 --> 00:09:12.820
blind spots. Okay, so they know they need the

00:09:12.820 --> 00:09:15.720
voices. Right, but how do they actually ensure

00:09:15.720 --> 00:09:18.200
those diverse voices feel safe enough to speak

00:09:18.200 --> 00:09:20.440
up in a high -pressure boardroom? Because getting

00:09:20.440 --> 00:09:22.740
a seat at the table is one thing. Having the

00:09:22.740 --> 00:09:24.919
authorization to use your voice is something

00:09:24.919 --> 00:09:27.870
else entirely. And the panel was incredibly candid

00:09:27.870 --> 00:09:30.929
about the barriers here. Graciela shared that,

00:09:30.990 --> 00:09:33.809
early in her career, she was literally told to

00:09:33.809 --> 00:09:36.509
cut her indigenous curly hair so she would, quote,

00:09:36.649 --> 00:09:38.990
look the part for her executive level. Which

00:09:38.990 --> 00:09:41.250
ties directly back to Leanne's warning about

00:09:41.250 --> 00:09:44.269
the danger of emulation. The CPU drain again.

00:09:44.830 --> 00:09:47.669
Exactly. Leanne argues that a significant reason

00:09:47.669 --> 00:09:50.330
many women fail in corporate business is because

00:09:50.330 --> 00:09:52.909
they try to emulate aggressive male behaviors.

00:09:53.210 --> 00:09:55.509
Right. They force themselves into a posture that

00:09:55.509 --> 00:09:57.710
just isn't authentic to them. And it leads to

00:09:57.710 --> 00:10:00.210
utter exhaustion. It results in failure because

00:10:00.210 --> 00:10:02.409
you're spending half your energy just wearing

00:10:02.409 --> 00:10:04.970
a mask in every meeting. So if the solution isn't

00:10:04.970 --> 00:10:07.370
just sending out a company -wide memo that says,

00:10:07.590 --> 00:10:10.990
hey, be yourself, how do leaders actually dismantle

00:10:10.990 --> 00:10:13.929
that expectation of emulation? Well, Ron Garry

00:10:13.929 --> 00:10:16.210
has this tactical approach he uses that I just

00:10:16.210 --> 00:10:18.990
found fascinating. He calls it identifying wildflowers.

00:10:19.389 --> 00:10:21.429
Wildflowers. I love that term. What does that

00:10:21.429 --> 00:10:23.700
look like in practice? It's a brilliant piece

00:10:23.700 --> 00:10:26.940
of active management. So Ron notices a pattern.

00:10:28.100 --> 00:10:30.820
During informal prep sessions for big executive

00:10:30.820 --> 00:10:33.480
meetings, everyone is chatting, the ideas are

00:10:33.480 --> 00:10:35.740
flowing, and the diverse candidates on his team

00:10:35.740 --> 00:10:37.919
are just brilliant. OK, so they know their stuff

00:10:37.919 --> 00:10:40.539
in private. Exactly. Yeah. But the moment they

00:10:40.539 --> 00:10:42.799
step into the formal boardroom with the broader

00:10:42.799 --> 00:10:46.080
C -suite, certain individuals who he affectionately

00:10:46.080 --> 00:10:49.659
calls wildflowers suddenly clam up. They just

00:10:49.659 --> 00:10:51.919
shrink back. But hold on, if someone is already

00:10:51.919 --> 00:10:54.000
an introvert, or if they already feel marginalized

00:10:54.000 --> 00:10:56.700
in a room full of, you know, type A executives,

00:10:57.340 --> 00:10:59.500
isn't cold -calling them in front of the entire

00:10:59.500 --> 00:11:02.100
C -suite the exact opposite of psychological

00:11:02.100 --> 00:11:04.519
safety? Like, that honestly sounds terrifying

00:11:04.519 --> 00:11:06.159
to me. Oh, it would be absolutely terrifying

00:11:06.159 --> 00:11:08.600
if you did it blind. But the mechanism that makes

00:11:08.600 --> 00:11:11.820
this work is prep session. His strategy is entirely

00:11:11.820 --> 00:11:13.840
proactive. Okay, so he plans it out with them

00:11:13.840 --> 00:11:16.700
beforehand. Yes. Before they ever walk into the

00:11:16.700 --> 00:11:18.899
boardroom, he sits down with his wildflowers

00:11:18.899 --> 00:11:21.639
and says, listen, be ready. At some point in

00:11:21.639 --> 00:11:23.519
this meeting, I'm going to throw you a softball

00:11:23.519 --> 00:11:26.580
or a t -ball question. He tells them, I am going

00:11:26.580 --> 00:11:29.139
to intentionally create a gap in the conversation

00:11:29.139 --> 00:11:33.529
for you. And I want you to show your value. Ah,

00:11:33.710 --> 00:11:36.450
so he leverages his own power and privilege as

00:11:36.450 --> 00:11:38.669
the leader in the room to construct a safe off

00:11:38.669 --> 00:11:41.210
ramp for them. Precisely. He tees them up so

00:11:41.210 --> 00:11:43.250
they don't have to fight to interject over all

00:11:43.250 --> 00:11:46.269
the loud voices. They just have to step up and

00:11:46.269 --> 00:11:48.470
knock the softball out of the park. He doesn't

00:11:48.470 --> 00:11:50.470
just hope they find the courage to speak over

00:11:50.470 --> 00:11:53.750
loud executives. He actually engineers the environment

00:11:53.750 --> 00:11:56.129
so they can prove their immense value to the

00:11:56.129 --> 00:11:58.269
rest of the room. That is real leadership right

00:11:58.269 --> 00:12:01.049
there. It really is. And this raises an important

00:12:01.049 --> 00:12:04.840
question about... which Leanne illustrates with

00:12:04.840 --> 00:12:07.799
a really powerful anecdote from a previous company

00:12:07.799 --> 00:12:10.340
she worked at. Oh, the hoodie story. Yeah. This

00:12:10.340 --> 00:12:13.159
story completely stopped me in my tracks. It's

00:12:13.159 --> 00:12:15.320
incredibly moving. It was an all -hands meeting

00:12:15.320 --> 00:12:17.960
during Black History Month. A young black tech

00:12:17.960 --> 00:12:20.019
employee gets up on the stage to address the

00:12:20.019 --> 00:12:22.320
company. And what does he tell them? He explains

00:12:22.320 --> 00:12:25.360
to the crowd that his entire life, for his own

00:12:25.360 --> 00:12:27.039
physical safety in his neighborhood and with

00:12:27.039 --> 00:12:29.100
authorities, he was trained to keep his hoodie

00:12:29.100 --> 00:12:32.440
up. keep his voice low, and stay quiet. That

00:12:32.440 --> 00:12:35.539
was his literal survival mechanism. Yes. And

00:12:35.539 --> 00:12:37.879
then he walks through the doors of a fast -paced

00:12:37.879 --> 00:12:40.740
tech company, and suddenly management expects

00:12:40.740 --> 00:12:43.899
him to act like a loud, extroverted, table -pounding

00:12:43.899 --> 00:12:47.200
Stanford grad. They expect him to totally reverse

00:12:47.200 --> 00:12:49.360
a lifetime of survival conditioning just because

00:12:49.360 --> 00:12:52.159
he walked into a corporate office. It's a profound

00:12:52.159 --> 00:12:55.480
realization of how historical norms of corporate

00:12:55.480 --> 00:12:59.299
behavior are completely alien. or even historically

00:12:59.299 --> 00:13:02.159
dangerous for the very people we are now inviting

00:13:02.159 --> 00:13:04.580
into the building. So Leanne emphasizes that

00:13:04.580 --> 00:13:07.720
inclusivity cannot just be a broad sweeping initiative,

00:13:07.899 --> 00:13:09.840
right? It's a highly individual people issue.

00:13:10.059 --> 00:13:12.580
Exactly. Because you have white male introverts,

00:13:12.759 --> 00:13:14.919
you have working mothers, you have young black

00:13:14.919 --> 00:13:17.159
men carrying the weight of systemic caution.

00:13:17.379 --> 00:13:19.940
And they all have completely unique operational

00:13:19.940 --> 00:13:22.559
needs. Which is exactly why she aggressively

00:13:22.559 --> 00:13:25.340
champions things like flexible work schedules.

00:13:26.359 --> 00:13:29.779
Inclusion means looking at the individual and

00:13:29.779 --> 00:13:34.080
realizing that the rigid 9 -5 aggressive boardroom

00:13:34.080 --> 00:13:38.179
structure only optimizes performance for a very

00:13:38.179 --> 00:13:41.519
specific type of person. Right. If you want the

00:13:41.519 --> 00:13:43.779
absolute best out of your entire workforce, you

00:13:43.779 --> 00:13:46.039
have to offer flexible environments that meet

00:13:46.039 --> 00:13:49.139
them where their CPU runs most efficiently. Perfectly

00:13:49.139 --> 00:13:51.679
said. So what does this all mean for you, the

00:13:51.679 --> 00:13:53.559
person listening right now, trying to navigate

00:13:53.559 --> 00:13:56.440
your own career? The panel tied this back to

00:13:56.440 --> 00:13:58.740
a phrase we hear constantly, personal brand,

00:13:59.200 --> 00:14:01.419
but they approached it completely differently.

00:14:01.500 --> 00:14:03.720
Yeah, they really flipped it on its head. Graciela

00:14:03.720 --> 00:14:05.679
said you have to find your brand, secure your

00:14:05.679 --> 00:14:08.120
foundation, and then just flaunt it. Think about

00:14:08.120 --> 00:14:10.980
how a multi -billion dollar corporate brand works.

00:14:11.419 --> 00:14:13.679
If consumers don't quite get a company's brand,

00:14:13.860 --> 00:14:16.340
the company doesn't panic, abandon its identity,

00:14:16.679 --> 00:14:18.399
and pretend to be its competitor. Right. They

00:14:18.399 --> 00:14:20.659
go back to their core foundation, they strengthen

00:14:20.659 --> 00:14:22.960
their messaging, and they communicate their value

00:14:22.960 --> 00:14:26.429
better. Exactly. Inclusion isn't a one -off email

00:14:26.429 --> 00:14:29.269
you send out in a designated month. As Graciela

00:14:29.269 --> 00:14:31.230
frames it, it's the difference between going

00:14:31.230 --> 00:14:33.929
on a crash diet for a week and fundamentally

00:14:33.929 --> 00:14:36.549
changing your lifestyle to be healthy. Inclusion

00:14:36.549 --> 00:14:39.809
has to be a daily operational habit. You can't

00:14:39.809 --> 00:14:42.169
invite someone to the table and then demand they

00:14:42.169 --> 00:14:44.870
use your exact manners, your exact tone of voice,

00:14:44.870 --> 00:14:47.690
and your exact aggressive posture. You have to

00:14:47.690 --> 00:14:50.350
let them be who they are because, as one of the

00:14:50.350 --> 00:14:52.669
panelists noted, everyone else has already taken.

00:14:52.919 --> 00:14:55.639
That's a great quote and this is where the timeline

00:14:55.639 --> 00:14:58.539
of our discussion really shifts. Because when

00:14:58.539 --> 00:15:01.419
an organization actually masters this internal

00:15:01.419 --> 00:15:03.899
inclusion when they remove that emulation tax

00:15:03.899 --> 00:15:06.200
from their employees Exactly when they do that.

00:15:06.200 --> 00:15:07.919
It doesn't just stay trapped inside the walls

00:15:07.919 --> 00:15:10.220
of the corporate headquarters It creates this

00:15:10.220 --> 00:15:13.460
massive ripple effect that spills out into global

00:15:13.460 --> 00:15:16.519
community impact Yes, and this transition is

00:15:16.519 --> 00:15:18.919
crucial because when a massive company starts

00:15:18.919 --> 00:15:21.820
deploying its resources to do good globally It

00:15:21.820 --> 00:15:24.200
actually solves one of the most pressing internal

00:15:24.200 --> 00:15:27.019
crises companies face today, which is the desperate

00:15:26.960 --> 00:15:29.460
craving for purpose among their own employees.

00:15:30.000 --> 00:15:33.139
And Ron detailed some incredible mechanics of

00:15:33.139 --> 00:15:35.120
how HP is doing this. Right because a lot of

00:15:35.120 --> 00:15:37.220
companies just passively write donation checks

00:15:37.220 --> 00:15:40.139
to universities. Yeah. But HP actively partners

00:15:40.139 --> 00:15:43.220
with historically black colleges and universities,

00:15:43.379 --> 00:15:47.820
HBCUs, to physically shape their tech curriculums.

00:15:47.940 --> 00:15:51.080
Wait, so they actually help write the coursework?

00:15:51.539 --> 00:15:54.259
Yes. Ron literally sits down with academic leaders

00:15:54.259 --> 00:15:57.899
and says, here are the exact IT skills I need

00:15:57.899 --> 00:16:01.470
as a global CIO today. He helps them build the

00:16:01.470 --> 00:16:03.309
coursework so that when these students graduate,

00:16:03.710 --> 00:16:06.070
they are perfectly calibrated to be hired immediately.

00:16:06.210 --> 00:16:08.529
That is so much more valuable than just a check.

00:16:08.799 --> 00:16:11.899
He also shared that HP's treasurer made major,

00:16:12.100 --> 00:16:14.360
highly intentional cash deposits into black -owned

00:16:14.360 --> 00:16:16.799
banks in Detroit and Houston. They didn't just

00:16:16.799 --> 00:16:18.960
leave all their capital in Wall Street institutions.

00:16:19.080 --> 00:16:21.940
Right. They placed it there specifically so those

00:16:21.940 --> 00:16:24.299
local banks could lend that money out and reinvest

00:16:24.299 --> 00:16:26.039
directly into those local communities. It's all

00:16:26.039 --> 00:16:28.860
about intentionality. But the story that truly

00:16:28.860 --> 00:16:31.340
showcases the intersection of global supply chain

00:16:31.340 --> 00:16:34.340
and personal purpose is Ron's connection to Haiti.

00:16:34.679 --> 00:16:37.759
Oh, this story. It's amazing. So Ron's parents

00:16:37.759 --> 00:16:40.179
migrated from Haiti to the U .S. in the late

00:16:40.179 --> 00:16:43.620
60s. Tragically, during the devastating earthquake

00:16:43.620 --> 00:16:47.200
there, he lost 12 family members. Just heartbreaking.

00:16:47.480 --> 00:16:49.440
It is. And he shared a really haunting detail.

00:16:50.419 --> 00:16:52.419
One of his relatives actually called him the

00:16:52.419 --> 00:16:55.799
Knight of the Quake, and he didn't answer. That

00:16:55.799 --> 00:16:58.059
missed call has just stayed with him ever since.

00:16:58.500 --> 00:17:01.259
Man. So to channel that grief into action, he

00:17:01.259 --> 00:17:04.180
serves on the board of SBP, an organization that

00:17:04.180 --> 00:17:06.640
rebuilds homes after natural disasters. Right.

00:17:06.859 --> 00:17:09.119
But here is the amazing way his corporate life

00:17:09.119 --> 00:17:12.279
intersects with his personal mission. HP actually

00:17:12.279 --> 00:17:14.579
set up a recycling center in Haiti. And they

00:17:14.579 --> 00:17:16.380
employ locals there, right? Yes, they employ

00:17:16.380 --> 00:17:19.019
locals to pull ocean -bound plastics right off

00:17:19.019 --> 00:17:22.289
the beaches. And that recycled material is integrated

00:17:22.289 --> 00:17:24.910
directly into HP's core supply chain. This blew

00:17:24.910 --> 00:17:27.809
my mind. It makes up 60 % of the physical material

00:17:27.809 --> 00:17:31.089
in the HP Dragonfly laptop that Ron himself uses

00:17:31.089 --> 00:17:33.849
every day. It is not a charity write -off. It

00:17:33.849 --> 00:17:36.150
is core procurement. And to bring the story entirely

00:17:36.150 --> 00:17:38.569
full circle, Ron recently discovered that his

00:17:38.569 --> 00:17:41.609
own second cousin is employed at that exact recycling

00:17:41.609 --> 00:17:44.309
facility in Haiti, building a sustainable living

00:17:44.309 --> 00:17:47.250
for his family. that is a company's inclusive

00:17:47.250 --> 00:17:49.769
supply chain, literally changing the trajectory

00:17:49.769 --> 00:17:52.430
of a community and the very family of the executive

00:17:52.430 --> 00:17:54.869
leading the charge. When you hear the mechanics

00:17:54.869 --> 00:17:57.049
of a story like that, you really start to understand

00:17:57.049 --> 00:17:59.630
Leanne's advice regarding the daily news cycle.

00:17:59.809 --> 00:18:02.329
Oh, absolutely. She pointed out how watching

00:18:02.329 --> 00:18:04.609
the news every day can make us feel incredibly

00:18:04.609 --> 00:18:08.150
sad, overwhelmed, and just completely disempowered.

00:18:08.410 --> 00:18:10.730
Yeah, the world just feels too heavy to fix sometimes.

00:18:11.009 --> 00:18:14.500
But she offered a very pragmatic antidote. Doing

00:18:14.500 --> 00:18:17.640
good. She stresses how vital it is for companies

00:18:17.640 --> 00:18:20.240
to let employees choose where they want to direct

00:18:20.240 --> 00:18:22.920
their community efforts. So don't just dictate

00:18:22.920 --> 00:18:25.200
the corporate charity from the top down. Exactly.

00:18:25.460 --> 00:18:27.619
Empower the employee to solve a problem in their

00:18:27.619 --> 00:18:29.980
own backyard. Because community service isn't

00:18:29.980 --> 00:18:32.680
just a corporate public relations strategy. It

00:18:32.680 --> 00:18:35.500
is a vital operational tool for employee mental

00:18:35.500 --> 00:18:38.359
health. It's how a workforce gains understanding

00:18:38.359 --> 00:18:41.599
and shifts perspective. As she simply put it,

00:18:41.700 --> 00:18:44.119
when you do good for others, you biologically

00:18:44.119 --> 00:18:46.700
feel good for yourself. And this directly explains

00:18:46.700 --> 00:18:48.799
the massive labor shifts we've seen, you know,

00:18:48.880 --> 00:18:51.240
what the media calls the great resignation. People

00:18:51.240 --> 00:18:53.319
aren't just quitting to sit on the couch. No,

00:18:53.359 --> 00:18:56.240
they're migrating. Right. If you are a highly

00:18:56.240 --> 00:18:58.700
skilled worker in an organization that doesn't

00:18:58.700 --> 00:19:01.319
value your authentic self, you're going to leave

00:19:01.319 --> 00:19:03.880
and find a company that actually serves a higher

00:19:03.880 --> 00:19:06.539
good and offers a tangible sense of purpose.

00:19:06.759 --> 00:19:11.000
Exactly. Retaining top talent today means giving

00:19:11.000 --> 00:19:14.220
your workforce a reason to be intensely proud

00:19:14.220 --> 00:19:17.279
of the logo on their paycheck. If the company

00:19:17.279 --> 00:19:20.400
is actively engaged in the community, the employees

00:19:20.400 --> 00:19:23.440
feel a shared sense of ownership over that positive

00:19:23.440 --> 00:19:25.950
impact. So let's take a step back and look at

00:19:25.950 --> 00:19:27.869
the trajectory we've been on today. We started

00:19:27.869 --> 00:19:29.789
out trying to cut through the buzzwords of corporate

00:19:29.789 --> 00:19:32.410
culture, looking for the actual mechanics of

00:19:32.410 --> 00:19:35.390
inclusion. And what we found is that it is deeply

00:19:35.390 --> 00:19:38.789
personal, rooted in painful experiences, and

00:19:38.789 --> 00:19:41.569
highly operational. We saw how a personal feeling

00:19:41.569 --> 00:19:44.289
of being an outsider, like being mistaken for

00:19:44.289 --> 00:19:46.569
the valet or spending 18 months trying to erase

00:19:46.569 --> 00:19:49.009
your own accent, can evolve into a leadership

00:19:49.009 --> 00:19:52.190
style that intentionally engineers off -ramps

00:19:52.190 --> 00:19:54.849
for quiet voices in the boardroom. We explored

00:19:54.849 --> 00:19:57.589
how removing the exhausting burden of emulation

00:19:57.589 --> 00:20:00.250
frees up the mental processing power required

00:20:00.250 --> 00:20:02.990
to redesign life -saving medical equipment, ensuring

00:20:02.990 --> 00:20:06.130
that MRI machines actually fit the diverse reality

00:20:06.130 --> 00:20:08.589
of the human body. And we saw how a corporate

00:20:08.589 --> 00:20:12.450
commitment community can literally pull plastic

00:20:12.450 --> 00:20:14.950
out of the ocean in Haiti, turning it into a

00:20:14.950 --> 00:20:17.450
laptop while providing sustainable jobs for the

00:20:17.450 --> 00:20:19.849
very families of the executives leading the company.

00:20:19.890 --> 00:20:21.690
It all comes down to the architecture of the

00:20:21.690 --> 00:20:23.470
environments we build and work in. It really

00:20:23.470 --> 00:20:25.990
does. So here is a final thought to mull over

00:20:25.990 --> 00:20:28.089
as you close out this deep dive and go about

00:20:28.089 --> 00:20:31.210
your day. We've spent this time exploring how

00:20:31.210 --> 00:20:34.009
human beings must avoid emulating the majority

00:20:34.009 --> 00:20:36.950
just to fit into a corporate machine. We know

00:20:36.950 --> 00:20:39.109
that code switching drains our vital energy.

00:20:39.690 --> 00:20:42.250
Right. But as we increasingly rely on artificial

00:20:42.250 --> 00:20:44.509
intelligence to write our emails, to screen our

00:20:44.509 --> 00:20:46.950
resumes, and to manage our schedules, are we

00:20:46.950 --> 00:20:49.029
unknowingly building a digital infrastructure

00:20:49.029 --> 00:20:51.789
that will force the next generation to code switch

00:20:52.220 --> 00:20:55.039
just to be understood by the algorithm. That

00:20:55.039 --> 00:20:57.859
is a terrifying thought. Are we finally freeing

00:20:57.859 --> 00:21:00.460
humans from the burden of emulation in the boardroom

00:21:00.460 --> 00:21:03.680
only to program that exact same bias into our

00:21:03.680 --> 00:21:06.339
machines? Take a hard look at where you spend

00:21:06.339 --> 00:21:09.079
your 40 hours a week. Are you spending your energy

00:21:09.079 --> 00:21:11.319
trying to emulate someone else or are you in

00:21:11.319 --> 00:21:14.059
an environment that actively amplifies your authentic

00:21:14.059 --> 00:21:16.740
self? It's a profound question about what we

00:21:16.740 --> 00:21:19.789
are optimizing for in the future. Something to

00:21:19.789 --> 00:21:22.769
keep a close eye on as technology evolves. Thank

00:21:22.769 --> 00:21:25.069
you for joining us on this deep dive. Until next

00:21:25.069 --> 00:21:26.910
time, keep looking beneath the surface.
