1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:04,480
All right, so this time we're really diving into the deep end, talking about some serious

2
00:00:04,480 --> 00:00:07,920
Nobel Prize winning research on artificial neural networks.

3
00:00:07,920 --> 00:00:12,940
We've got a whole bunch of cool stuff to dig into today, transcripts from those Nobel Prize

4
00:00:12,940 --> 00:00:17,360
press conferences, one from the University of Toronto, and then there's another from

5
00:00:17,360 --> 00:00:19,840
the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.

6
00:00:19,840 --> 00:00:24,160
Oh, and even some snippets from interviews with the winners themselves, you know, getting

7
00:00:24,160 --> 00:00:25,280
this firsthand insights.

8
00:00:25,280 --> 00:00:27,560
Yeah, and you're spot on calling it a deep dive.

9
00:00:27,560 --> 00:00:30,640
This isn't just like a quick update or a new gadget review.

10
00:00:30,640 --> 00:00:35,640
This is about understanding the core, the foundation that this whole AI explosion is

11
00:00:35,640 --> 00:00:37,640
built on, and it goes way back.

12
00:00:37,640 --> 00:00:41,040
It's kind of like giving the Nobel Prize to the Wright brothers, just as we're all figuring

13
00:00:41,040 --> 00:00:43,000
out jet engines, isn't it?

14
00:00:43,000 --> 00:00:48,140
But before we go too far down the rabbit hole of AI as we know it now, let's rewind a bit.

15
00:00:48,140 --> 00:00:54,160
This year's Nobel Prize actually recognizes not one, but four incredible minds.

16
00:00:54,160 --> 00:00:57,040
Exactly, and it's important we recognize all of them.

17
00:00:57,040 --> 00:00:59,640
Of course, there's Jeffrey Hinton from the University of Toronto.

18
00:00:59,640 --> 00:01:00,640
You know him.

19
00:01:00,640 --> 00:01:04,760
He's practically AI royalty, the godfather of AI, as they call him.

20
00:01:04,760 --> 00:01:09,800
Right, and we can't forget Yoshua Bengio from the University of Montreal, and Jan Lacoon,

21
00:01:09,800 --> 00:01:12,880
who's doing amazing work at both NYU and Metta.

22
00:01:12,880 --> 00:01:16,800
I mean, they might not be front and center in those Nobel announcements, but trust me,

23
00:01:16,800 --> 00:01:19,360
their contributions are a huge part of the story.

24
00:01:19,360 --> 00:01:20,440
Absolutely massive.

25
00:01:20,440 --> 00:01:24,320
And then there's the one that caught me a little off guard, John Hopfield from Princeton

26
00:01:24,320 --> 00:01:28,360
University, a giant in the world of biological physics.

27
00:01:28,360 --> 00:01:32,960
What folks might not realize is how much he shaped our understanding of neural networks.

28
00:01:32,960 --> 00:01:37,000
Okay, yeah, I've got to admit, seeing his name next to those AI giants was a bit of

29
00:01:37,000 --> 00:01:38,320
a head scratcher at first.

30
00:01:38,320 --> 00:01:41,280
But that's what I love about these deep dives, those unexpected connections.

31
00:01:41,280 --> 00:01:43,360
So how does Hopfield fit into all of this?

32
00:01:43,360 --> 00:01:45,280
All right, so picture this.

33
00:01:45,280 --> 00:01:46,280
It's the early 1980s.

34
00:01:46,280 --> 00:01:48,920
AI is still, you know, finding its feet.

35
00:01:48,920 --> 00:01:53,680
And Hopfield drops this bombshell work on what we now call the Hopfield network.

36
00:01:53,680 --> 00:01:58,080
It was revolutionary, truly groundbreaking, because it showed for the first time ever

37
00:01:58,080 --> 00:02:02,840
that you could actually represent information in a network using patterns of activation,

38
00:02:02,840 --> 00:02:04,720
just like neurons firing in our brains.

39
00:02:04,720 --> 00:02:11,880
So instead of your computer saving, say, a picture as vacationphoto.jpg, it's more like

40
00:02:11,880 --> 00:02:16,760
a bunch of connections lighting up in a specific way to represent that memory.

41
00:02:16,760 --> 00:02:17,760
Exactly.

42
00:02:17,760 --> 00:02:18,760
This was huge.

43
00:02:18,760 --> 00:02:23,320
It suggested that maybe, just maybe, we could build machines that actually think like we

44
00:02:23,320 --> 00:02:24,320
do.

45
00:02:24,320 --> 00:02:25,320
Wow.

46
00:02:25,320 --> 00:02:26,320
All right.

47
00:02:26,320 --> 00:02:27,320
So that's why he's part of this Nobel Prize lineup.

48
00:02:27,320 --> 00:02:28,880
But you mentioned limitations earlier.

49
00:02:28,880 --> 00:02:29,880
What were they?

50
00:02:29,880 --> 00:02:34,280
Well, the Hopfield network was amazing at storing and retrieving those simple patterns.

51
00:02:34,280 --> 00:02:37,720
But when it came to more complex information, it struggled.

52
00:02:37,720 --> 00:02:42,440
So like remembering a phone number versus understanding, let's say, a whole conversation.

53
00:02:42,440 --> 00:02:43,440
Perfect example.

54
00:02:43,440 --> 00:02:47,120
And this is where Hinton and his colleague Terry Sushnowski come in.

55
00:02:47,120 --> 00:02:49,280
They ask this really interesting question.

56
00:02:49,280 --> 00:02:53,180
What if we added another layer to this network, a hidden layer?

57
00:02:53,180 --> 00:02:57,400
That question led to something remarkable, the development of what we now call the Boltzmann

58
00:02:57,400 --> 00:02:58,400
machine.

59
00:02:58,400 --> 00:02:59,400
Hold on.

60
00:02:59,400 --> 00:03:00,400
Hidden nodes.

61
00:03:00,400 --> 00:03:01,400
What makes them so special?

62
00:03:01,400 --> 00:03:04,120
Think of them like those behind-the-scenes players, you know, not directly connected

63
00:03:04,120 --> 00:03:06,360
to the input or output.

64
00:03:06,360 --> 00:03:12,080
These hidden nodes allow the Boltzmann machine to learn and process information in a way

65
00:03:12,080 --> 00:03:16,560
more complex and nuanced way, like this.

66
00:03:16,560 --> 00:03:19,040
Your brain doesn't just passively store information, right?

67
00:03:19,040 --> 00:03:20,040
It processes it.

68
00:03:20,040 --> 00:03:22,440
It looks for patterns, makes connections.

69
00:03:22,440 --> 00:03:26,720
These hidden nodes brought that kind of complexity to artificial neural networks.

70
00:03:26,720 --> 00:03:32,240
So it's like, Hotfield lays the foundation and Hinton adds a whole new floor to the building.

71
00:03:32,240 --> 00:03:33,720
Sounds like a recipe for success.

72
00:03:33,720 --> 00:03:35,480
It was, at least in theory.

73
00:03:35,480 --> 00:03:39,560
The problem was, the computers back then, they just couldn't handle how complex the

74
00:03:39,560 --> 00:03:40,680
Boltzmann machine was.

75
00:03:40,680 --> 00:03:41,680
Yeah.

76
00:03:41,680 --> 00:03:43,940
It's like having a Ferrari but no roads to drive it on.

77
00:03:43,940 --> 00:03:47,980
The idea is they were groundbreaking, but a lot of people, they had their doubts.

78
00:03:47,980 --> 00:03:49,440
Would this ever really work?

79
00:03:49,440 --> 00:03:54,160
So they had this amazing idea, this machine with so much potential, but just not the horsepower

80
00:03:54,160 --> 00:03:55,160
to really make it go.

81
00:03:55,160 --> 00:03:57,740
It kind of makes you appreciate how far we've come, you know?

82
00:03:57,740 --> 00:03:58,820
For sure.

83
00:03:58,820 --> 00:04:03,160
It really shows how far we've pushed those boundaries in terms of computing power.

84
00:04:03,160 --> 00:04:04,160
But you're right.

85
00:04:04,160 --> 00:04:07,760
It would have been easy for Hinton and everyone else to just throw in the towel, say, maybe

86
00:04:07,760 --> 00:04:09,080
someday, but not today.

87
00:04:09,080 --> 00:04:10,080
Right.

88
00:04:10,080 --> 00:04:13,000
Just waiting around for technology to catch up to those big ideas.

89
00:04:13,000 --> 00:04:15,800
And that's what I think is so cool about this.

90
00:04:15,800 --> 00:04:19,440
No matter what you're into, there's this lesson there, this persistence.

91
00:04:19,440 --> 00:04:23,380
They believed in those ideas even when the tools didn't exist yet.

92
00:04:23,380 --> 00:04:24,380
And it paid off.

93
00:04:24,380 --> 00:04:25,380
Big time.

94
00:04:25,380 --> 00:04:28,100
Here's where our story takes another turn.

95
00:04:28,100 --> 00:04:32,200
Remember how those early networks like that Boltzmann machine were kind of held back by

96
00:04:32,200 --> 00:04:34,200
the computers of the time?

97
00:04:34,200 --> 00:04:38,680
Well Hinton, along with some other brilliant minds like David Romelhardt, they figured

98
00:04:38,680 --> 00:04:41,960
out this learning algorithm for neural networks called backpropagation.

99
00:04:41,960 --> 00:04:42,960
OK.

100
00:04:42,960 --> 00:04:43,960
Got to stop you there for a sec.

101
00:04:43,960 --> 00:04:47,640
I kept seeing that word backpropagation pop up in the articles.

102
00:04:47,640 --> 00:04:49,800
And I'll be honest, I kind of skimmed over it.

103
00:04:49,800 --> 00:04:51,320
It sounds pretty intense.

104
00:04:51,320 --> 00:04:53,920
What's the easiest way to wrap your head around it?

105
00:04:53,920 --> 00:04:54,920
OK.

106
00:04:54,920 --> 00:04:56,680
So imagine you're learning to play the piano.

107
00:04:56,680 --> 00:04:57,680
Right.

108
00:04:57,680 --> 00:04:59,900
At first, you're hitting a ton of wrong notes.

109
00:04:59,900 --> 00:05:03,880
But every time you miss one, you adjust your fingers a little, maybe even think about the

110
00:05:03,880 --> 00:05:05,320
music differently.

111
00:05:05,320 --> 00:05:06,800
Backpropagation.

112
00:05:06,800 --> 00:05:10,760
That's basically the neural network doing the same thing, learning from its mistakes.

113
00:05:10,760 --> 00:05:14,960
It tweaks those connections between the nodes, those artificial neurons, until it gets it

114
00:05:14,960 --> 00:05:15,960
right.

115
00:05:15,960 --> 00:05:19,680
So it's constantly refining, getting better based on the feedback.

116
00:05:19,680 --> 00:05:20,680
Exactly.

117
00:05:20,680 --> 00:05:21,680
And that was huge.

118
00:05:21,680 --> 00:05:25,840
It allowed those super complex networks to learn way more efficiently, even with the

119
00:05:25,840 --> 00:05:28,720
limited computing power they had back then.

120
00:05:28,720 --> 00:05:32,780
So it's like they found a workaround, a way to make these incredible machines actually

121
00:05:32,780 --> 00:05:35,000
work within the limitations they had.

122
00:05:35,000 --> 00:05:36,120
Nailed it.

123
00:05:36,120 --> 00:05:41,240
And that, along with the work of other pioneers we talked about, like Yoshua Bengio and Yan

124
00:05:41,240 --> 00:05:46,080
LeCun, it set the stage for the AI explosion we're seeing today.

125
00:05:46,080 --> 00:05:49,720
It's mind-blowing to think that so much of the AI we use every day, stuff we don't even

126
00:05:49,720 --> 00:05:53,440
think twice about, goes back to that one clever solution.

127
00:05:53,440 --> 00:05:57,080
It really highlights the power of that fundamental research.

128
00:05:57,080 --> 00:05:58,760
These weren't people trying to build the next big app.

129
00:05:58,760 --> 00:06:01,640
They were trying to understand intelligence itself.

130
00:06:01,640 --> 00:06:06,720
Speaking of unlocking secrets, I think it's time to address the elephant in the room,

131
00:06:06,720 --> 00:06:09,780
the whole what could go wrong part of AI.

132
00:06:09,780 --> 00:06:13,680
Both Hinton and Hopfield have expressed some serious concerns, right?

133
00:06:13,680 --> 00:06:15,800
Yeah, and they're not alone.

134
00:06:15,800 --> 00:06:19,540
As AI gets more advanced, the risks get bigger too.

135
00:06:19,540 --> 00:06:23,440
And we're not just talking about some far-off sci-fi dystopia.

136
00:06:23,440 --> 00:06:27,540
It's funny you say that because when I hear people talking about the dangers of AI, my

137
00:06:27,540 --> 00:06:31,600
mind goes straight to Terminator robots taking over the world.

138
00:06:31,600 --> 00:06:32,800
That makes for a good movie.

139
00:06:32,800 --> 00:06:35,720
But the reality is way more complex.

140
00:06:35,720 --> 00:06:38,800
What's more concerning are those immediate dangers, things that are already starting

141
00:06:38,800 --> 00:06:39,900
to happen.

142
00:06:39,900 --> 00:06:44,880
Think about the potential for massive misinformation campaigns using these hyper-realistic deep

143
00:06:44,880 --> 00:06:45,880
fakes.

144
00:06:45,880 --> 00:06:49,320
Oh, you mean those videos where it looks and sounds exactly like someone, but it's totally

145
00:06:49,320 --> 00:06:50,320
fake?

146
00:06:50,320 --> 00:06:51,320
Exactly.

147
00:06:51,320 --> 00:06:52,320
Yeah.

148
00:06:52,320 --> 00:06:58,400
Imagine a super-realistic video of, say, a world leader declaring war or something.

149
00:06:58,400 --> 00:07:01,760
The potential for chaos is enormous.

150
00:07:01,760 --> 00:07:02,920
And that's just one example.

151
00:07:02,920 --> 00:07:07,720
We're also seeing AI being used in these incredibly advanced cyber attacks, making our systems

152
00:07:07,720 --> 00:07:09,160
more vulnerable than ever.

153
00:07:09,160 --> 00:07:10,560
It's kind of freaky, right?

154
00:07:10,560 --> 00:07:13,240
We're living in a sci-fi movie, but it's actually happening.

155
00:07:13,240 --> 00:07:17,160
And these are challenges most of us haven't even begun to consider, I think.

156
00:07:17,160 --> 00:07:18,160
Absolutely.

157
00:07:18,160 --> 00:07:21,960
And that's exactly why we need to be talking about AI safety right now.

158
00:07:21,960 --> 00:07:23,880
We can't just sit back and watch this happen.

159
00:07:23,880 --> 00:07:26,080
So where do we even start?

160
00:07:26,080 --> 00:07:28,640
Can we even slow down AI development at this point?

161
00:07:28,640 --> 00:07:31,280
It feels like every day there's something new, some big breakthrough.

162
00:07:31,280 --> 00:07:32,280
You're right.

163
00:07:32,280 --> 00:07:33,440
It's moving so fast.

164
00:07:33,440 --> 00:07:37,240
Trying to stop AI research altogether, that's probably not going to happen.

165
00:07:37,240 --> 00:07:40,200
And it might not even be the right thing to do, really.

166
00:07:40,200 --> 00:07:42,840
We have to remember, this technology has a huge upside, too.

167
00:07:42,840 --> 00:07:44,000
Yeah, for sure.

168
00:07:44,000 --> 00:07:48,720
We've seen how AI can be used in health care, scientific research, even tackling climate

169
00:07:48,720 --> 00:07:49,720
change.

170
00:07:49,720 --> 00:07:52,240
So it's not about pretending AI is all bad.

171
00:07:52,240 --> 00:07:56,680
It's about figuring out how to manage the risks without killing the innovation.

172
00:07:56,680 --> 00:07:57,680
Right on.

173
00:07:57,680 --> 00:08:01,640
And so what Hinn has been saying, he's really stressed how important it is for governments

174
00:08:01,640 --> 00:08:07,040
and regulators to step up, to push these big tech companies to care about AI safety just

175
00:08:07,040 --> 00:08:09,600
as much as they care about profits.

176
00:08:09,600 --> 00:08:15,120
Finding that balance, making sure these incredibly powerful technologies are used responsibly,

177
00:08:15,120 --> 00:08:16,120
that's the key.

178
00:08:16,120 --> 00:08:17,800
That's going to be tough, though, right?

179
00:08:17,800 --> 00:08:20,800
Especially with all these companies racing to be the AI leader.

180
00:08:20,800 --> 00:08:25,840
It's like the space race, but instead of countries, it's these tech giants battling it out.

181
00:08:25,840 --> 00:08:27,500
That's a good way to put it.

182
00:08:27,500 --> 00:08:29,440
But it's not just about who gets there first.

183
00:08:29,440 --> 00:08:32,000
It's about what we do when we get there.

184
00:08:32,000 --> 00:08:36,240
And that brings me to this really big kind of philosophical question that Hinton asks,

185
00:08:36,240 --> 00:08:38,880
something I think we should all be asking ourselves.

186
00:08:38,880 --> 00:08:42,900
What if, or maybe even when, AI becomes smarter than us?

187
00:08:42,900 --> 00:08:44,400
What does that mean for humanity?

188
00:08:44,400 --> 00:08:45,400
Whoa, OK.

189
00:08:45,400 --> 00:08:46,680
You're really going there.

190
00:08:46,680 --> 00:08:48,440
It makes you think about everything, doesn't it?

191
00:08:48,440 --> 00:08:52,840
Our whole identity, our place in the universe, it's all built around this idea that humans

192
00:08:52,840 --> 00:08:55,680
are like the smartest things out there.

193
00:08:55,680 --> 00:08:56,680
Exactly.

194
00:08:56,680 --> 00:09:01,520
So if AI becomes more intelligent than us, does that mean we're less than?

195
00:09:01,520 --> 00:09:06,280
Do we see it as a threat, as competition, or maybe like a partner in a way we can't

196
00:09:06,280 --> 00:09:07,480
even imagine yet?

197
00:09:07,480 --> 00:09:10,600
These are tough questions, but they're questions we can't ignore.

198
00:09:10,600 --> 00:09:14,200
It's exciting, you know, but also kind of scary to think about.

199
00:09:14,200 --> 00:09:20,480
Move on from those early days of AI just trying to mimic the human brain to facing questions

200
00:09:20,480 --> 00:09:23,840
that could totally change what it means to be human.

201
00:09:23,840 --> 00:09:26,000
And that's the most important thing to take away from all of this.

202
00:09:26,000 --> 00:09:28,480
This isn't just about code and algorithms.

203
00:09:28,480 --> 00:09:32,800
This is about our future, all of us, and we have a role to play in shaping it.

204
00:09:32,800 --> 00:09:34,600
It's a lot, but so important.

205
00:09:34,600 --> 00:09:38,880
It reminds me that sometimes those big discoveries, they're not just about the science itself,

206
00:09:38,880 --> 00:09:42,160
they're about the questions they make us ask about ourselves and the world.

207
00:09:42,160 --> 00:09:43,160
I like that.

208
00:09:43,160 --> 00:09:45,280
Maybe that's the beauty of a good deep dive.

209
00:09:45,280 --> 00:09:49,600
It's not about giving all the answers, it's about sparking that curiosity, getting you

210
00:09:49,600 --> 00:09:52,440
to look at things, maybe even yourself, a little differently.

211
00:09:52,440 --> 00:09:56,000
Well, on that note, we're going to leave you with some food for thought.

212
00:09:56,000 --> 00:09:59,800
Keep learning, keep asking questions, and who knows what amazing things you'll find.

213
00:09:59,800 --> 00:10:13,320
Until next time, happy diving.