1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:01,400
Hey everyone, welcome back.

2
00:00:01,400 --> 00:00:04,960
Ready to dive deep into some seriously cool AI stuff?

3
00:00:04,960 --> 00:00:06,040
Always ready.

4
00:00:06,040 --> 00:00:08,240
So we're diving into this awesome presentation

5
00:00:08,240 --> 00:00:11,120
by Eric Brinjolfsson, a real heavyweight

6
00:00:11,120 --> 00:00:13,240
in the world of digital economics right now.

7
00:00:13,240 --> 00:00:16,240
He's got his finger on the pulse of where AI is

8
00:00:16,240 --> 00:00:19,380
and where it's going, and more importantly,

9
00:00:19,380 --> 00:00:20,640
what it all means for us.

10
00:00:20,640 --> 00:00:22,520
Exactly, the impact is what matters.

11
00:00:22,520 --> 00:00:23,480
Totally.

12
00:00:23,480 --> 00:00:24,840
And what I always find so interesting

13
00:00:24,840 --> 00:00:28,960
about Brinjolfsson's work is how he connects AI

14
00:00:28,960 --> 00:00:32,280
to the real world, the actual economic impact.

15
00:00:32,280 --> 00:00:34,960
Everyone's talking about AI, but he cuts through the hype

16
00:00:34,960 --> 00:00:36,040
and gets to the heart of it.

17
00:00:36,040 --> 00:00:36,840
Yeah, no doubt.

18
00:00:36,840 --> 00:00:38,200
He's all about the practical side.

19
00:00:38,200 --> 00:00:40,780
Right, and he comes out swinging with his bold statement,

20
00:00:40,780 --> 00:00:43,360
claiming that AI is the defining general purpose

21
00:00:43,360 --> 00:00:45,040
technology of our time.

22
00:00:45,040 --> 00:00:48,560
He even compares it to electricity or the steam

23
00:00:48,560 --> 00:00:50,680
engine, those massive game changers in history.

24
00:00:50,680 --> 00:00:52,280
It's a pretty bold comparison.

25
00:00:52,280 --> 00:00:52,960
Yeah.

26
00:00:52,960 --> 00:00:54,660
So I'm curious, what do you think?

27
00:00:54,660 --> 00:00:57,040
Does that comparison hold water?

28
00:00:57,040 --> 00:00:58,560
Well, let's think about it for a sec.

29
00:00:58,560 --> 00:01:01,240
What did electricity really do for us?

30
00:01:01,240 --> 00:01:02,840
I mean, yeah, it lit up our homes,

31
00:01:02,840 --> 00:01:03,960
but it was more than that, right?

32
00:01:03,960 --> 00:01:04,640
Way more.

33
00:01:04,640 --> 00:01:06,600
Right, it completely revolutionized

34
00:01:06,600 --> 00:01:08,320
how we lived and worked.

35
00:01:08,320 --> 00:01:10,320
Brinjolfsson argues that AI could

36
00:01:10,320 --> 00:01:13,480
be even more fundamental, more impactful than even that.

37
00:01:13,480 --> 00:01:15,480
And his reasoning is interesting.

38
00:01:15,480 --> 00:01:20,000
He says it has the potential to actually solve intelligence.

39
00:01:20,000 --> 00:01:24,080
Now, imagine, just imagine, applying that power to things

40
00:01:24,080 --> 00:01:26,840
like, say, designing brand new energy sources

41
00:01:26,840 --> 00:01:30,680
or even personalized medicine that could wipe out diseases

42
00:01:30,680 --> 00:01:32,000
before we even get them.

43
00:01:32,000 --> 00:01:32,640
Are you seeing what I mean?

44
00:01:32,640 --> 00:01:33,160
Oh, totally.

45
00:01:33,160 --> 00:01:34,720
It's like next level stuff.

46
00:01:34,720 --> 00:01:35,600
Right, it's huge.

47
00:01:35,600 --> 00:01:38,600
We're talking about a whole new era of human progress

48
00:01:38,600 --> 00:01:40,360
driven by AI.

49
00:01:40,360 --> 00:01:42,640
It's kind of mind blowing when you really think about it.

50
00:01:42,640 --> 00:01:43,200
It really is.

51
00:01:43,200 --> 00:01:45,040
It actually makes DeepMind's slogan,

52
00:01:45,040 --> 00:01:46,880
that whole solve intelligence, use

53
00:01:46,880 --> 00:01:48,520
it to solve everything else thing,

54
00:01:48,520 --> 00:01:50,160
seem a lot less like, I don't know,

55
00:01:50,160 --> 00:01:52,560
some tech company's pipe dream and a lot more like a real

56
00:01:52,560 --> 00:01:53,320
roadmap.

57
00:01:53,320 --> 00:01:55,440
Yeah, it suddenly feels a lot more tangible

58
00:01:55,440 --> 00:01:57,000
and a lot less like sci-fi.

59
00:01:57,000 --> 00:01:57,520
Exactly.

60
00:01:57,520 --> 00:01:58,020
Yeah.

61
00:01:58,020 --> 00:01:58,960
It's happening now.

62
00:01:58,960 --> 00:02:01,320
But Bryn Dobson, he's not just looking way ahead

63
00:02:01,320 --> 00:02:02,240
into the future.

64
00:02:02,240 --> 00:02:06,680
He also breaks down how AI got to where it is now.

65
00:02:06,680 --> 00:02:08,680
He divides it into these three distinct waves.

66
00:02:08,680 --> 00:02:11,400
First, you've got those early rule-based systems.

67
00:02:11,400 --> 00:02:13,440
Then comes the explosion of machine learning,

68
00:02:13,440 --> 00:02:15,080
what he calls software 2.0.

69
00:02:15,080 --> 00:02:17,040
Which is what everyone's talking about now.

70
00:02:17,040 --> 00:02:21,280
And then now we've got this whole new wave, generative AI,

71
00:02:21,280 --> 00:02:24,760
which is so advanced and moving so fast that even the experts

72
00:02:24,760 --> 00:02:26,320
are like, whoa, hold on a second.

73
00:02:26,320 --> 00:02:27,200
It's true.

74
00:02:27,200 --> 00:02:28,040
It's really wild.

75
00:02:28,040 --> 00:02:31,440
It's like that scene in the Will Smith movie,

76
00:02:31,440 --> 00:02:33,600
where he challenges a robot to write a symphony.

77
00:02:33,600 --> 00:02:35,760
That seemed totally impossible just a few years ago.

78
00:02:35,760 --> 00:02:36,560
But guess what?

79
00:02:36,560 --> 00:02:39,480
Now we have AI composing music, writing screenplays,

80
00:02:39,480 --> 00:02:43,160
even acing those standardized tests like the SAT and GRE.

81
00:02:43,160 --> 00:02:44,840
Science fiction is trying to catch up

82
00:02:44,840 --> 00:02:46,440
to what's actually happening.

83
00:02:46,440 --> 00:02:48,800
And the thing is, it's not just about AI

84
00:02:48,800 --> 00:02:51,060
mimicking human creativity.

85
00:02:51,060 --> 00:02:56,400
It's about showing this capacity for actual problem solving,

86
00:02:56,400 --> 00:02:58,720
for reasoning stuff that people used to think

87
00:02:58,720 --> 00:03:01,000
was totally unique to humans.

88
00:03:01,000 --> 00:03:03,480
And the really cool part, this isn't some far off thing.

89
00:03:03,480 --> 00:03:05,200
It's already happening in the real world,

90
00:03:05,200 --> 00:03:06,880
even in everyday places.

91
00:03:06,880 --> 00:03:07,680
Oh, absolutely.

92
00:03:07,680 --> 00:03:10,400
And Bryn Jolson's research on AI's impact

93
00:03:10,400 --> 00:03:12,640
on productivity in the workplace really

94
00:03:12,640 --> 00:03:13,960
brings it all down to Earth.

95
00:03:13,960 --> 00:03:15,680
And you know what?

96
00:03:15,680 --> 00:03:19,160
He uses a really unexpected example, call centers.

97
00:03:19,160 --> 00:03:20,000
Who would have thought?

98
00:03:20,000 --> 00:03:20,480
Right.

99
00:03:20,480 --> 00:03:22,840
It's not exactly the first place you think of when

100
00:03:22,840 --> 00:03:24,160
you think cutting edge AI.

101
00:03:24,160 --> 00:03:24,660
Right.

102
00:03:24,660 --> 00:03:26,000
So what's the story there?

103
00:03:26,000 --> 00:03:26,960
Think about it, right?

104
00:03:26,960 --> 00:03:28,880
Call center work is often very repetitive.

105
00:03:28,880 --> 00:03:30,560
They're dealing with similar questions,

106
00:03:30,560 --> 00:03:32,480
similar problems all day long.

107
00:03:32,480 --> 00:03:34,180
So Bryn Jolson's team wanted to see

108
00:03:34,180 --> 00:03:36,440
what would happen if they used AI to help out

109
00:03:36,440 --> 00:03:40,400
these human agents in real time, giving them suggestions,

110
00:03:40,400 --> 00:03:42,400
providing information, all while they're

111
00:03:42,400 --> 00:03:43,800
interacting with customers.

112
00:03:43,800 --> 00:03:45,280
OK, so like a little AI assistant

113
00:03:45,280 --> 00:03:46,400
whispering in their ear.

114
00:03:46,400 --> 00:03:47,360
Exactly.

115
00:03:47,360 --> 00:03:50,440
And they went in with this idea that AI would just

116
00:03:50,440 --> 00:03:51,720
make things more efficient.

117
00:03:51,720 --> 00:03:53,280
But the results, they're actually

118
00:03:53,280 --> 00:03:54,960
way more nuanced than that.

119
00:03:54,960 --> 00:03:56,600
It wasn't about replacing the humans.

120
00:03:56,600 --> 00:03:58,840
It was about amplifying their abilities

121
00:03:58,840 --> 00:04:00,600
in a way that helped everyone.

122
00:04:00,600 --> 00:04:01,680
So it was a win-win.

123
00:04:01,680 --> 00:04:02,600
It seems like it.

124
00:04:02,600 --> 00:04:04,280
OK, but what actually happened?

125
00:04:04,280 --> 00:04:07,200
Did the AI make the agents more efficient?

126
00:04:07,200 --> 00:04:10,120
Or were there other unexpected outcomes?

127
00:04:10,120 --> 00:04:10,680
I got to know.

128
00:04:10,680 --> 00:04:12,840
So across the board, they saw big improvements.

129
00:04:12,840 --> 00:04:14,920
The agents were handling more calls per hour.

130
00:04:14,920 --> 00:04:16,920
The time it took to resolve issues went down.

131
00:04:16,920 --> 00:04:20,560
And even, get this, customer satisfaction went up.

132
00:04:20,560 --> 00:04:23,200
But here's where it gets interesting.

133
00:04:23,200 --> 00:04:25,920
The AI seemed to benefit the less experienced workers

134
00:04:25,920 --> 00:04:26,720
the most.

135
00:04:26,720 --> 00:04:28,160
Now, that is unexpected.

136
00:04:28,160 --> 00:04:29,880
You'd think the more experienced agents

137
00:04:29,880 --> 00:04:32,760
would be the ones to really take advantage of this AI helper,

138
00:04:32,760 --> 00:04:33,760
right?

139
00:04:33,760 --> 00:04:34,880
Why do you think that is?

140
00:04:34,880 --> 00:04:37,080
It does seem counterintuitive, right?

141
00:04:37,080 --> 00:04:38,640
Well, Brynjolfsson thinks it might

142
00:04:38,640 --> 00:04:42,640
be because AI can actually capture and share

143
00:04:42,640 --> 00:04:44,720
what he calls tacit knowledge.

144
00:04:44,720 --> 00:04:48,640
That's like the unspoken, those subtle but effective things

145
00:04:48,640 --> 00:04:50,640
that the best performers just do naturally.

146
00:04:50,640 --> 00:04:53,560
It's like having a virtual mentor whispering in your ear,

147
00:04:53,560 --> 00:04:55,000
guiding you to better answers.

148
00:04:55,000 --> 00:04:56,040
Oh, that's so interesting.

149
00:04:56,040 --> 00:04:58,600
So AI is kind of leveling the playing field here,

150
00:04:58,600 --> 00:05:00,760
allowing those less experienced workers

151
00:05:00,760 --> 00:05:03,960
to tap into the expertise of those more seasoned agents.

152
00:05:03,960 --> 00:05:04,920
Yeah, exactly.

153
00:05:04,920 --> 00:05:08,000
It's like AI is democratizing expertise,

154
00:05:08,000 --> 00:05:09,320
which is a really cool thought.

155
00:05:09,320 --> 00:05:09,840
It is.

156
00:05:09,840 --> 00:05:11,880
It challenges all those traditional assumptions

157
00:05:11,880 --> 00:05:15,120
about technology and its impact on jobs.

158
00:05:15,120 --> 00:05:15,760
But you know what?

159
00:05:15,760 --> 00:05:18,640
This whole idea of AI enhancing human abilities rather than

160
00:05:18,640 --> 00:05:22,320
replacing us, it leads to a more maybe a bit

161
00:05:22,320 --> 00:05:25,200
of a cautionary note in Brynjolfsson's presentation

162
00:05:25,200 --> 00:05:27,160
when he starts talking about the Turing trap.

163
00:05:27,160 --> 00:05:29,360
Right, because it's not all sunshine and roses.

164
00:05:29,360 --> 00:05:30,760
Right, so what exactly is that?

165
00:05:30,760 --> 00:05:31,760
What's the Turing trap?

166
00:05:31,760 --> 00:05:33,320
So it's a really interesting concept.

167
00:05:33,320 --> 00:05:36,200
And it's all about shifting how we think about AI development.

168
00:05:36,200 --> 00:05:39,040
Like on the surface, creating an AI that's

169
00:05:39,040 --> 00:05:41,720
basically indistinguishable from a human,

170
00:05:41,720 --> 00:05:44,560
that seems like the ultimate goal, right?

171
00:05:44,560 --> 00:05:47,520
But Brynjolfsson says that this, while super ambitious,

172
00:05:47,520 --> 00:05:50,480
might actually be aiming too low.

173
00:05:50,480 --> 00:05:51,280
Really?

174
00:05:51,280 --> 00:05:52,320
In what way?

175
00:05:52,320 --> 00:05:54,160
It seems like a pretty high bar to clear.

176
00:05:54,160 --> 00:05:56,420
Well, he says that if all we focus on

177
00:05:56,420 --> 00:05:58,860
is replicating human capabilities,

178
00:05:58,860 --> 00:06:02,080
we're going to fall into this trap of just automating tasks

179
00:06:02,080 --> 00:06:04,040
that we already do instead of exploring

180
00:06:04,040 --> 00:06:06,720
what AI is truly capable of, like solving problems

181
00:06:06,720 --> 00:06:09,440
in completely new ways, ways that we can't even imagine.

182
00:06:09,440 --> 00:06:09,920
I see.

183
00:06:09,920 --> 00:06:12,760
Thinking outside the box, not just replicating what's in it.

184
00:06:12,760 --> 00:06:13,720
Exactly.

185
00:06:13,720 --> 00:06:16,000
Brynjolfsson, he uses this really interesting thought

186
00:06:16,000 --> 00:06:17,960
experiment to illustrate his point.

187
00:06:17,960 --> 00:06:22,320
He says, imagine we could send robots back to ancient Greece,

188
00:06:22,320 --> 00:06:24,920
robots that could perfectly copy everything the Greeks were

189
00:06:24,920 --> 00:06:28,240
doing, building temples, making pottery, all of it.

190
00:06:28,240 --> 00:06:31,120
Would that have actually moved human civilization forward?

191
00:06:31,120 --> 00:06:32,680
It's like, would it have even mattered?

192
00:06:32,680 --> 00:06:35,640
Right, or would we be stuck in the same old ways of thinking

193
00:06:35,640 --> 00:06:36,720
and doing things?

194
00:06:36,720 --> 00:06:37,920
Makes you think, huh?

195
00:06:37,920 --> 00:06:39,960
The Turing Trap is basically a reminder

196
00:06:39,960 --> 00:06:43,220
that our goal with AI shouldn't be to simply create

197
00:06:43,220 --> 00:06:45,080
a copycat of ourselves.

198
00:06:45,080 --> 00:06:47,600
It's about using AI's unique abilities

199
00:06:47,600 --> 00:06:50,800
to push the boundaries of what's possible,

200
00:06:50,800 --> 00:06:53,840
to tackle problems that we haven't been able to solve for

201
00:06:53,840 --> 00:06:56,000
centuries, and to create a future that

202
00:06:56,000 --> 00:06:57,400
actually benefits everyone.

203
00:06:57,400 --> 00:06:59,320
So it's about aiming higher and thinking bigger.

204
00:06:59,320 --> 00:06:59,840
Exactly.

205
00:06:59,840 --> 00:07:01,920
It's about looking at the big picture, right?

206
00:07:01,920 --> 00:07:03,800
Not just efficiency for its own sake.

207
00:07:03,800 --> 00:07:07,160
It's about deciding what we want the future to look like,

208
00:07:07,160 --> 00:07:11,560
which brings us to the real meat of Brynjolfsson's argument,

209
00:07:11,560 --> 00:07:12,840
the economic side of things.

210
00:07:12,840 --> 00:07:15,080
Because, yeah, robots in ancient Greece

211
00:07:15,080 --> 00:07:18,160
are super interesting, but it does feel a bit theoretical.

212
00:07:18,160 --> 00:07:20,560
So how does this Turing Trap actually

213
00:07:20,560 --> 00:07:22,200
play out in the real world, especially

214
00:07:22,200 --> 00:07:24,880
when we're talking about the economy and jobs and all that?

215
00:07:24,880 --> 00:07:27,480
OK, so let's imagine, just for a second,

216
00:07:27,480 --> 00:07:30,520
that we go all in on automation.

217
00:07:30,520 --> 00:07:33,440
Those robots in ancient Greece, they're real,

218
00:07:33,440 --> 00:07:35,680
and they're everywhere, in every industry.

219
00:07:35,680 --> 00:07:36,560
What happens?

220
00:07:36,560 --> 00:07:39,200
Well, productivity, it would go through the roof, right?

221
00:07:39,200 --> 00:07:40,640
But then what about wages?

222
00:07:40,640 --> 00:07:42,400
What about people's ability to buy stuff,

223
00:07:42,400 --> 00:07:44,200
to participate in the economy?

224
00:07:44,200 --> 00:07:47,680
Our whole system kind of relies on people having jobs,

225
00:07:47,680 --> 00:07:48,840
earning money, right?

226
00:07:48,840 --> 00:07:51,280
Right, it's like that classic sci-fi problem.

227
00:07:51,280 --> 00:07:53,560
We solve scarcity, but then what?

228
00:07:53,560 --> 00:07:57,080
It seems like this amazing potential of AI

229
00:07:57,080 --> 00:07:58,920
to make everything more productive

230
00:07:58,920 --> 00:08:00,640
could also backfire pretty badly.

231
00:08:00,640 --> 00:08:02,960
Exactly, and that's what Brynjolfsson is getting out

232
00:08:02,960 --> 00:08:03,760
with the Turing Trap.

233
00:08:03,760 --> 00:08:05,260
It's like this warning sign, right?

234
00:08:05,260 --> 00:08:07,760
It's saying, hey, if we're not careful,

235
00:08:07,760 --> 00:08:09,400
we could end up with an economy that's

236
00:08:09,400 --> 00:08:12,720
super efficient on paper, but also incredibly unfair.

237
00:08:12,720 --> 00:08:15,440
So we could end up with a tiny group of people

238
00:08:15,440 --> 00:08:17,240
benefiting from all this automation,

239
00:08:17,240 --> 00:08:20,080
while everyone else gets left behind, which is

240
00:08:20,080 --> 00:08:21,960
the opposite of what we want.

241
00:08:21,960 --> 00:08:23,280
And honestly, it's kind of what everyone's

242
00:08:23,280 --> 00:08:25,120
worried about these days, right?

243
00:08:25,120 --> 00:08:28,920
AI, taking over jobs, widening the gap between the haves

244
00:08:28,920 --> 00:08:32,320
and the have-nots, it feels like we're at this crossroads.

245
00:08:32,320 --> 00:08:34,280
And the decisions we make now, they're

246
00:08:34,280 --> 00:08:35,400
going to determine everything.

247
00:08:35,400 --> 00:08:35,880
You got it.

248
00:08:35,880 --> 00:08:36,880
It's a pivotal moment.

249
00:08:36,880 --> 00:08:40,760
So do we just keep automating everything, hoping for the best,

250
00:08:40,760 --> 00:08:44,200
but risking these potentially terrible outcomes?

251
00:08:44,200 --> 00:08:46,240
Or do we take a different route, one that's

252
00:08:46,240 --> 00:08:49,720
more about using AI as this tool for good,

253
00:08:49,720 --> 00:08:52,680
to work alongside us, to create new opportunities,

254
00:08:52,680 --> 00:08:55,200
and to finally tackle some of those huge problems that

255
00:08:55,200 --> 00:08:56,240
have been around forever?

256
00:08:56,240 --> 00:08:58,800
So like a more optimistic view of the future?

257
00:08:58,800 --> 00:09:00,360
More like a more intentional one, I think.

258
00:09:00,360 --> 00:09:01,680
OK, I like that.

259
00:09:01,680 --> 00:09:03,140
But how do we actually do that?

260
00:09:03,140 --> 00:09:05,360
How do we avoid this Turing trap?

261
00:09:05,360 --> 00:09:08,840
Is it about changing how we develop AI itself?

262
00:09:08,840 --> 00:09:11,920
Or are we talking about bigger societal changes?

263
00:09:11,920 --> 00:09:13,680
It's going to take both, honestly.

264
00:09:13,680 --> 00:09:15,440
It's a multifaceted challenge.

265
00:09:15,440 --> 00:09:18,000
Bryn Jolfsson, he talks about a two-palmed approach, right?

266
00:09:18,000 --> 00:09:20,840
First, we've got to shift our mindset from replacement

267
00:09:20,840 --> 00:09:22,200
to augmentation.

268
00:09:22,200 --> 00:09:25,400
We need to be investing in AI that works with us, that

269
00:09:25,400 --> 00:09:28,200
enhances what we're already good at, not just replaces us.

270
00:09:28,200 --> 00:09:30,000
Remember those call center workers?

271
00:09:30,000 --> 00:09:31,920
The AI wasn't there to take their jobs.

272
00:09:31,920 --> 00:09:34,240
It was there to make them better at their jobs,

273
00:09:34,240 --> 00:09:35,520
to give them new skills.

274
00:09:35,520 --> 00:09:37,720
So it's about finding ways for humans and AI

275
00:09:37,720 --> 00:09:40,720
to be on the same team, each playing to their strengths.

276
00:09:40,720 --> 00:09:41,680
Exactly.

277
00:09:41,680 --> 00:09:45,000
Now, the other piece of this, and it's a big one, is policy.

278
00:09:45,000 --> 00:09:46,580
We need to give companies a reason

279
00:09:46,580 --> 00:09:48,600
to adopt this whole augmentation approach.

280
00:09:48,600 --> 00:09:51,240
Maybe that's tax breaks, grants, something

281
00:09:51,240 --> 00:09:54,120
that encourages them to invest in AI that helps humans,

282
00:09:54,120 --> 00:09:55,440
not just pushes them out.

283
00:09:55,440 --> 00:09:57,760
Right, because if we want companies to do the right thing,

284
00:09:57,760 --> 00:10:00,840
we've got to make it make sense for their bottom line, too.

285
00:10:00,840 --> 00:10:02,800
But even with the right policies and everything,

286
00:10:02,800 --> 00:10:05,560
it still feels like there's so much uncertainty.

287
00:10:05,560 --> 00:10:08,800
I mean, AI is changing so fast, how can we even

288
00:10:08,800 --> 00:10:12,440
begin to predict what the world will look like in 10, 20, 50

289
00:10:12,440 --> 00:10:13,120
years?

290
00:10:13,120 --> 00:10:15,560
It's kind of mind boggling.

291
00:10:15,560 --> 00:10:17,520
And speaking of predictions, Bryn Jolson

292
00:10:17,520 --> 00:10:20,280
mentioned some pretty wild ones about the timeline

293
00:10:20,280 --> 00:10:22,720
for this idea of transformative AI,

294
00:10:22,720 --> 00:10:24,560
like when AI will totally reshape

295
00:10:24,560 --> 00:10:25,960
every part of our lives.

296
00:10:25,960 --> 00:10:27,400
He even brings up some predictions

297
00:10:27,400 --> 00:10:30,360
about artificial general intelligence, or AGI, that

298
00:10:30,360 --> 00:10:32,040
is kind of blowing my mind right now.

299
00:10:32,040 --> 00:10:34,440
Yeah, the pace of a development is really something else.

300
00:10:34,440 --> 00:10:38,040
Even just a couple of years ago, the predictions about AGI,

301
00:10:38,040 --> 00:10:39,840
when AI can do basically anything

302
00:10:39,840 --> 00:10:42,680
a human can do intellectually, we're way, way further out.

303
00:10:42,680 --> 00:10:44,760
Remember that prediction platform we talked about,

304
00:10:44,760 --> 00:10:45,760
Metaculous?

305
00:10:45,760 --> 00:10:49,000
Well, this year, they're saying AGI could be here by 2032.

306
00:10:49,000 --> 00:10:50,860
Whoa, that's right around the corner.

307
00:10:50,860 --> 00:10:52,860
I don't even know what to do with that information.

308
00:10:52,860 --> 00:10:56,680
It makes Bryn Jolson's call for a Project Apollo for AI

309
00:10:56,680 --> 00:10:58,640
seem incredibly important.

310
00:10:58,640 --> 00:11:02,040
Totally, he's talking about this massive coordinated research

311
00:11:02,040 --> 00:11:05,440
effort, something on the scale of, well, the Apollo program

312
00:11:05,440 --> 00:11:07,200
that put people on the moon.

313
00:11:07,200 --> 00:11:11,520
But this time, it's all about understanding and navigating

314
00:11:11,520 --> 00:11:13,800
this AI revolution we're in the middle of.

315
00:11:13,800 --> 00:11:15,720
So it's not just about the technology itself.

316
00:11:15,720 --> 00:11:18,340
It's about figuring out the rules, the social contract,

317
00:11:18,340 --> 00:11:21,560
all of it, to make sure AI benefits everyone.

318
00:11:21,560 --> 00:11:22,360
Exactly.

319
00:11:22,360 --> 00:11:26,800
Bryn Jolson is challenging us to think big, to think long term,

320
00:11:26,800 --> 00:11:29,960
and to start laying the groundwork now for a future

321
00:11:29,960 --> 00:11:33,120
where AI helps us reach our full potential instead

322
00:11:33,120 --> 00:11:34,440
of holding us back.

323
00:11:34,440 --> 00:11:36,400
Yeah, it really makes you think about the future

324
00:11:36,400 --> 00:11:39,080
in a whole new way and all the possibilities,

325
00:11:39,080 --> 00:11:41,160
and maybe a little bit of the uncertainty, too.

326
00:11:41,160 --> 00:11:42,680
It's a lot to take in, for sure.

327
00:11:42,680 --> 00:11:43,180
It is.

328
00:11:43,180 --> 00:11:43,680
It is.

329
00:11:43,680 --> 00:11:45,680
But before we go too far down that rabbit hole,

330
00:11:45,680 --> 00:11:47,880
let's just take a second to recap what we've

331
00:11:47,880 --> 00:11:49,140
learned from Bryn Jolson today.

332
00:11:49,140 --> 00:11:50,400
It's been a wild ride.

333
00:11:50,400 --> 00:11:52,140
He's really changed how I think about AI.

334
00:11:52,140 --> 00:11:53,000
That's for sure.

335
00:11:53,000 --> 00:11:53,600
We do.

336
00:11:53,600 --> 00:11:57,560
So he basically argues that AI is this incredibly powerful

337
00:11:57,560 --> 00:12:01,000
force, maybe even the defining force of our time.

338
00:12:01,000 --> 00:12:06,080
He even says it's potentially a GPT like electricity, maybe even

339
00:12:06,080 --> 00:12:07,920
more so because it can solve intelligence.

340
00:12:07,920 --> 00:12:10,040
And it's not just theoretical either, right?

341
00:12:10,040 --> 00:12:10,920
Right.

342
00:12:10,920 --> 00:12:13,560
He brings it all back to reality with that call center example,

343
00:12:13,560 --> 00:12:15,260
which I thought was super interesting.

344
00:12:15,260 --> 00:12:18,880
Here's this real world example of AI actually

345
00:12:18,880 --> 00:12:21,700
making people's jobs better, even

346
00:12:21,700 --> 00:12:24,080
helping those who might not have as much experience.

347
00:12:24,080 --> 00:12:26,760
Which I think highlights that key point about the Turing

348
00:12:26,760 --> 00:12:27,560
trap, right?

349
00:12:27,560 --> 00:12:29,720
Just automating everything isn't the answer.

350
00:12:29,720 --> 00:12:32,280
It's about finding those win-win situations where

351
00:12:32,280 --> 00:12:34,040
AI and humans work together.

352
00:12:34,040 --> 00:12:34,760
Exactly.

353
00:12:34,760 --> 00:12:35,920
We need both.

354
00:12:35,920 --> 00:12:38,080
And that means we've got to change our thinking about AI,

355
00:12:38,080 --> 00:12:41,240
both in how we develop it and in the policies we put in place

356
00:12:41,240 --> 00:12:44,040
to make sure everyone benefits, not just a select few.

357
00:12:44,040 --> 00:12:46,400
It's about being proactive, shaping the future,

358
00:12:46,400 --> 00:12:48,440
instead of just letting it happen to us.

359
00:12:48,440 --> 00:12:49,780
100%.

360
00:12:49,780 --> 00:12:51,960
And that brings us back to that final question

361
00:12:51,960 --> 00:12:54,240
that Bryn Jolson leaves us with.

362
00:12:54,240 --> 00:12:57,200
If we can use AI to do all these amazing things,

363
00:12:57,200 --> 00:13:00,600
to solve problems, to create new possibilities, what kind

364
00:13:00,600 --> 00:13:01,920
of future could we create?

365
00:13:01,920 --> 00:13:02,880
It's a big question.

366
00:13:02,880 --> 00:13:04,120
It is a really big question.

367
00:13:04,120 --> 00:13:08,080
It goes way beyond the tech, beyond the economics even.

368
00:13:08,080 --> 00:13:11,560
It's about what we value as a society, what we aspire to.

369
00:13:11,560 --> 00:13:14,120
And I love that he doesn't pretend

370
00:13:14,120 --> 00:13:15,480
to have all the answers.

371
00:13:15,480 --> 00:13:16,080
Right.

372
00:13:16,080 --> 00:13:19,040
He's inviting all of us to be part of this conversation,

373
00:13:19,040 --> 00:13:20,880
to grapple with these big questions,

374
00:13:20,880 --> 00:13:22,680
and to make sure that the future of AI

375
00:13:22,680 --> 00:13:24,960
is one that benefits all of humanity.

376
00:13:24,960 --> 00:13:26,000
Perfectly said.

377
00:13:26,000 --> 00:13:27,840
And that's what we've tried to do today, too, right?

378
00:13:27,840 --> 00:13:29,920
Give you the information, the different perspectives,

379
00:13:29,920 --> 00:13:31,560
so you can form your own opinions

380
00:13:31,560 --> 00:13:34,200
about this incredible technology that's changing everything.

381
00:13:34,200 --> 00:13:35,240
So keep learning.

382
00:13:35,240 --> 00:13:37,160
Keep asking those tough questions.

383
00:13:37,160 --> 00:13:40,240
And remember, the future of AI is not set in stone.

384
00:13:40,240 --> 00:13:42,320
It's something we're all creating together.

385
00:13:42,320 --> 00:13:49,320
Until next time, stay curious, everyone.

