WEBVTT

00:00:10.509 --> 00:00:13.429
Welcome to the Bullvine Podcast, where we cut

00:00:13.429 --> 00:00:15.910
through the dairy industry's noise to deliver

00:00:15.910 --> 00:00:19.510
the unfiltered truth. Today, we're tackling the

00:00:19.510 --> 00:00:22.250
billion -dollar question, should your dairy grow

00:00:22.250 --> 00:00:26.179
its own grain or stick to milking cows? New research

00:00:26.179 --> 00:00:29.620
from Penn State reveals a shocking 15 % energy

00:00:29.620 --> 00:00:33.039
savings for farms that grow their feed. But equipment

00:00:33.039 --> 00:00:36.299
dealers won't tell you about the $500 ,000 price

00:00:36.299 --> 00:00:39.880
tag or the 15 -year payback period. We'll dissect

00:00:39.880 --> 00:00:42.439
the brutal economics, expose the hidden risks

00:00:42.439 --> 00:00:44.859
for high -producing herds, and share real -world

00:00:44.859 --> 00:00:47.100
case studies from dairies that made grain work

00:00:47.100 --> 00:00:50.380
and those that went bankrupt trying. Stick around

00:00:50.380 --> 00:00:54.000
to hear why a 650 -cow New York operation calls

00:00:54.000 --> 00:00:56.960
grain their secret profit center, while a Wisconsin

00:00:56.960 --> 00:01:00.960
farmer says, growing corn nearly sunk us. Plus,

00:01:01.140 --> 00:01:03.259
we'll give you a step -by -step tool to decide

00:01:03.259 --> 00:01:06.159
if this gamble could save or sink your dairy.

00:01:06.700 --> 00:01:09.879
No BS, just the facts you need. Let's dig in.

00:01:10.060 --> 00:01:12.540
Welcome back to The Deep Dive, where we try to

00:01:12.540 --> 00:01:14.519
wade through all the information out there for

00:01:14.519 --> 00:01:17.400
you. Today, we're tackling a question that, well,

00:01:17.540 --> 00:01:19.900
it's probably popped up a few times lately. Should

00:01:19.900 --> 00:01:23.159
your dairy get into growing its own grain? Is,

00:01:23.239 --> 00:01:25.680
you know, a smart move for the bottom line, maybe

00:01:25.680 --> 00:01:29.359
even energy independence? Or is it a risky detour?

00:01:29.519 --> 00:01:31.459
Yeah, that's really the core issue, isn't it?

00:01:31.640 --> 00:01:35.019
We've got some fascinating stuff here. Research

00:01:35.019 --> 00:01:36.959
pointing one way, heart economics pointing another.

00:01:37.260 --> 00:01:39.739
It's definitely not a simple yes or no answer

00:01:39.739 --> 00:01:42.780
you might get from, say, your nutritionist or

00:01:42.780 --> 00:01:45.090
banker. We're going deeper. Exactly. I mean,

00:01:45.090 --> 00:01:46.989
on one hand, you hear about this Penn State research

00:01:46.989 --> 00:01:49.189
showing some, frankly, pretty surprising energy

00:01:49.189 --> 00:01:52.409
savings, like up to 15 % for farms growing their

00:01:52.409 --> 00:01:55.109
own feed. That sounds great. But then you look

00:01:55.109 --> 00:01:57.090
at the price tag on a combine. Right. Suddenly

00:01:57.090 --> 00:02:00.049
that 15 % feels a bit different. So that's the

00:02:00.049 --> 00:02:02.170
real tension here. Our mission today is to unpack

00:02:02.170 --> 00:02:05.189
all of this, the research, the costs, the real

00:02:05.189 --> 00:02:07.510
world stuff, and give you a clear picture of

00:02:07.510 --> 00:02:09.849
when growing grain might make sense for a dairy

00:02:09.849 --> 00:02:12.699
and, well, when it probably doesn't. And it seems

00:02:12.699 --> 00:02:15.020
like good timing, too. Our sources say there's

00:02:15.020 --> 00:02:17.419
a definite upswing in interest in this idea across

00:02:17.419 --> 00:02:19.960
different dairy regions. There really is. And

00:02:19.960 --> 00:02:21.879
it's not just out of the blue. Farmers are looking

00:02:21.879 --> 00:02:25.400
hard at feed costs, thinking about supply chain

00:02:25.400 --> 00:02:28.060
security after the last few years. And that flexibility,

00:02:28.419 --> 00:02:32.039
being able to use land for grain or forage, that's

00:02:32.039 --> 00:02:34.060
definitely appealing, too. Absolutely. That control

00:02:34.060 --> 00:02:37.490
factor is tempting. Like our sources say, you

00:02:37.490 --> 00:02:40.169
really got to evaluate your own situation carefully

00:02:40.169 --> 00:02:43.210
before jumping in. So, OK, let's start with this

00:02:43.210 --> 00:02:45.990
shocking energy advantage the Penn State research

00:02:45.990 --> 00:02:48.270
found. Tell us about that. Right. So the good

00:02:48.270 --> 00:02:51.259
news. as one source puts it. They found northeast

00:02:51.259 --> 00:02:53.659
dairy farms growing their own grain could cut

00:02:53.659 --> 00:02:57.680
fossil energy inputs by, yeah, up to 15 % compared

00:02:57.680 --> 00:03:00.139
to farms importing all their feed. They compared

00:03:00.139 --> 00:03:03.240
farms, same herd size, same milk output, but

00:03:03.240 --> 00:03:05.560
different levels of feed self -sufficiency. And

00:03:05.560 --> 00:03:08.039
yeah, ones doing both forage and grain on farms

00:03:08.039 --> 00:03:11.520
saw that 15 % drop in energy per turn of milk.

00:03:11.599 --> 00:03:13.759
Okay, 15%. That's not small potatoes. So where's

00:03:13.759 --> 00:03:16.520
that saving coming from? Magic. Not quite magic.

00:03:16.680 --> 00:03:20.020
It's mostly about importing way less feed, 71

00:03:20.020 --> 00:03:22.800
% less than the study. Think about it. Growing

00:03:22.800 --> 00:03:25.800
feed, say, in the Midwest, often relies heavily

00:03:25.800 --> 00:03:28.740
on synthetic nitrogen fertilizers. Making those

00:03:28.740 --> 00:03:31.180
fertilizers, that takes a lot of energy. Right.

00:03:31.219 --> 00:03:33.000
It's not free energy baked into the fertilizer

00:03:33.000 --> 00:03:36.159
bag. Exactly. But when you grow grain on farm,

00:03:36.439 --> 00:03:40.550
you can leverage your own resources better. Manure

00:03:40.550 --> 00:03:43.289
becomes a key nutrient source. Legumes in the

00:03:43.289 --> 00:03:45.949
rotation help fix nitrogen naturally. The Penn

00:03:45.949 --> 00:03:48.389
State team actually saw nitrogen inputs were

00:03:48.389 --> 00:03:51.289
four times higher for the imported corn compared

00:03:51.289 --> 00:03:53.689
to their trial farm using manure and legumes.

00:03:53.789 --> 00:03:56.150
Four times. Wow, that's a huge difference. It

00:03:56.150 --> 00:03:57.870
really is. And it's not just Penn State saying

00:03:57.870 --> 00:04:00.270
this. Research out of the University of Wisconsin

00:04:00.270 --> 00:04:02.789
-Madison backs it up. They found integrated crop

00:04:02.789 --> 00:04:04.750
livestock systems could cut purchase fertilizer

00:04:04.750 --> 00:04:08.259
needs by up to 80 percent. And their long -term

00:04:08.259 --> 00:04:10.500
trials showed diverse rotations could keep yields

00:04:10.500 --> 00:04:13.400
up while cutting input costs, maybe $40 to $70

00:04:13.400 --> 00:04:16.019
an acre compared to continuous corn. Okay, so

00:04:16.019 --> 00:04:18.980
the energy efficiency side looks, well, pretty

00:04:18.980 --> 00:04:21.459
compelling on paper. Less fertilizer, less transport.

00:04:21.740 --> 00:04:24.180
But let's bring it back to the farm level, that

00:04:24.180 --> 00:04:27.800
15 % overall energy saving. How does that line

00:04:27.800 --> 00:04:31.500
up with... where a dairy actually uses energy

00:04:31.500 --> 00:04:33.800
day to day. What are the big hogs on the power

00:04:33.800 --> 00:04:35.660
bill? That's a really important connection to

00:04:35.660 --> 00:04:38.199
make. Yeah. NYSERDA report that's the New York

00:04:38.199 --> 00:04:40.079
State Energy Research and Development Authority

00:04:40.079 --> 00:04:44.180
broke it down. Ventilation, big one, about 25%.

00:04:44.180 --> 00:04:47.540
Lighting, close behind at 24%. Milk cooling,

00:04:47.720 --> 00:04:51.180
22%. Vacuum pumps, 17%. Then you get down to

00:04:51.180 --> 00:04:53.680
manure handling, water heating. Those are around

00:04:53.680 --> 00:04:56.259
4 % each. And actual feeding equipment, only

00:04:56.259 --> 00:04:59.379
about 3%. 3%. Wow, okay. So the energy saved

00:04:59.379 --> 00:05:01.360
by growing grain is mostly before it even gets

00:05:01.360 --> 00:05:03.259
to your farm gate in the production and transport.

00:05:03.459 --> 00:05:06.180
But the big energy users on the farm fans, lights,

00:05:06.300 --> 00:05:08.740
cooling, aren't directly changed by where the

00:05:08.740 --> 00:05:12.220
grain comes from. Precisely. That 15 % reduction

00:05:12.220 --> 00:05:15.439
is significant environmentally, for sure. But

00:05:15.439 --> 00:05:17.019
it doesn't mean your farm's electricity bill

00:05:17.019 --> 00:05:20.100
will suddenly drop by 15%. The savings are mainly

00:05:20.100 --> 00:05:23.180
upstream. It's a critical distinction when you're

00:05:23.180 --> 00:05:25.420
thinking about your farm's direct operating costs.

00:05:25.879 --> 00:05:28.000
Right. Okay, so the energy piece is complex.

00:05:28.220 --> 00:05:30.920
That leads us to this fundamental point the sources

00:05:30.920 --> 00:05:33.759
kept hitting. Milk comes first. Sounds obvious,

00:05:33.879 --> 00:05:36.839
maybe. It sounds obvious, but it's easy to lose

00:05:36.839 --> 00:05:39.379
sight of. You're a dairy farmer. Your main job,

00:05:39.420 --> 00:05:41.360
your core business, is making milk efficiently.

00:05:41.939 --> 00:05:44.519
Everything else should support that. So the question

00:05:44.519 --> 00:05:47.699
is, does adding a whole grain enterprise truly

00:05:47.699 --> 00:05:50.420
help you make milk better or more profitably?

00:05:50.779 --> 00:05:54.500
Or does it pull resources your time, your people's

00:05:54.500 --> 00:05:57.069
time, your capital? Away from the cows. Yeah,

00:05:57.110 --> 00:05:59.389
I can see that. Especially where high -quality

00:05:59.389 --> 00:06:01.269
forage is king, you wouldn't want to compromise

00:06:01.269 --> 00:06:03.209
your haylage quality because you're stretched

00:06:03.209 --> 00:06:05.810
too thin trying to manage grain crops, too. Exactly.

00:06:05.990 --> 00:06:08.350
You need to be honest. Do you have the land,

00:06:08.490 --> 00:06:11.610
the time, the labor to add grain acres without

00:06:11.610 --> 00:06:13.410
messing up your forage planting and harvesting

00:06:13.410 --> 00:06:15.709
schedule? If things are already tight, adding

00:06:15.709 --> 00:06:17.990
another big job could cause problems everywhere.

00:06:18.370 --> 00:06:20.290
Right. Can't chase the grain dream while the

00:06:20.290 --> 00:06:22.829
forage harvester sits idle or the cows are waiting.

00:06:23.790 --> 00:06:26.509
Okay, this leads us straight into the scary part

00:06:26.509 --> 00:06:29.930
for many. Equipment costs. This isn't just about

00:06:29.930 --> 00:06:32.389
buying a bit more seed, is it? Not even close.

00:06:32.910 --> 00:06:35.970
Forget just seed. Fertilizer. Herbicide costs.

00:06:36.029 --> 00:06:38.529
You're talking major capital. Specialized stuff.

00:06:38.990 --> 00:06:42.129
Combines. Grain planters. Drills. They're not

00:06:42.129 --> 00:06:46.050
cheap. These storage bins. Maybe dryers. You

00:06:46.050 --> 00:06:47.990
need people to run it all. More labor. And the

00:06:47.990 --> 00:06:50.449
land itself. If you put 200 acres into corn for

00:06:50.449 --> 00:06:53.600
grain, that's 200 acres. not growing forage or

00:06:53.600 --> 00:06:55.639
maybe not rented out, that's a real cost, the

00:06:55.639 --> 00:06:58.079
opportunity cost. Absolutely. So yeah, the energy

00:06:58.079 --> 00:07:00.339
savings are nice to talk about, but the economics,

00:07:00.600 --> 00:07:02.980
way more complicated. The sources suggest that

00:07:02.980 --> 00:07:05.639
often growing your own grain only really pencils

00:07:05.639 --> 00:07:07.920
out financially when commodity prices are high.

00:07:08.040 --> 00:07:10.540
When they drop, you might wish you'd just bought

00:07:10.540 --> 00:07:12.759
it. It really makes you ask, if I have, say,

00:07:12.920 --> 00:07:14.980
half a million dollars to invest, where does

00:07:14.980 --> 00:07:17.579
it make the biggest impact? A new combine. Or

00:07:17.579 --> 00:07:20.319
maybe better bedding or parlor upgrades? That's

00:07:20.319 --> 00:07:23.120
exactly the critical question. Okay, let's dive

00:07:23.120 --> 00:07:24.920
into some of those numbers. University of Minnesota

00:07:24.920 --> 00:07:28.079
Extension laid out some typical costs. A new

00:07:28.079 --> 00:07:31.180
combine. Yeah, I saw that. $300 ,000, up to half

00:07:31.180 --> 00:07:33.839
a million bucks. Yeah. And depreciating $20 ,000

00:07:33.839 --> 00:07:36.439
to $50 ,000 a year. Ouch. And that's just the

00:07:36.439 --> 00:07:39.639
combine. A corn planter. $80 ,000 to $150 ,000.

00:07:40.040 --> 00:07:43.000
Grain drill, maybe $40 ,000 to $80 ,000. Then

00:07:43.000 --> 00:07:45.939
storage bins priced per bushel, maybe $1 .80

00:07:45.939 --> 00:07:50.519
to $2 .50 a bushel capacity. Handling gear, augers,

00:07:50.600 --> 00:07:53.319
conveyors, another $25 ,000 to $80 ,000. Ed and

00:07:53.319 --> 00:07:56.600
maybe a dryer, $40 ,000 to $150 ,000 there too.

00:07:56.779 --> 00:08:00.199
So for a medium dairy, maybe 150, 300 cows trying

00:08:00.199 --> 00:08:03.069
to grow even just... half their grain, you could

00:08:03.069 --> 00:08:04.769
easily be looking at over half a million dollars

00:08:04.769 --> 00:08:07.129
in capital. And that's before fuel, maintenance,

00:08:07.329 --> 00:08:09.389
labor. Exactly. It adds up incredibly fast. And

00:08:09.389 --> 00:08:11.009
this ties into that Penn State extension warning

00:08:11.009 --> 00:08:12.970
about false efficiency. You think you're saving

00:08:12.970 --> 00:08:14.689
energy or being self -sufficient, but you create

00:08:14.689 --> 00:08:16.230
this huge financial burden with the equipment,

00:08:16.350 --> 00:08:18.050
maybe straining other parts of the operation.

00:08:18.290 --> 00:08:20.110
Grain growing can definitely fall into that trap.

00:08:20.370 --> 00:08:22.069
Okay. So you bite the bullet, you buy the iron.

00:08:22.329 --> 00:08:24.230
When does it actually start paying you back?

00:08:24.910 --> 00:08:26.750
Cornell looked at this break -even stuff, right?

00:08:26.810 --> 00:08:30.069
And it varies a lot. Hugely. Depends on your

00:08:30.069 --> 00:08:31.930
farm size, what equipment you might already have,

00:08:32.090 --> 00:08:35.110
and crucially, what grain prices are doing. For

00:08:35.110 --> 00:08:37.409
a smaller place, maybe 50, 100 acres of grain.

00:08:37.809 --> 00:08:40.110
Cornell figured the break -even corn price might

00:08:40.110 --> 00:08:44.309
need to be $5 .80 to $7 .25 a bushel. And the

00:08:44.309 --> 00:08:47.009
payback could be 15 plus years if you bought

00:08:47.009 --> 00:08:50.049
all new gear. 15 years. 15 years. Wow, that's

00:08:50.049 --> 00:08:52.009
a long horizon. Does it get better for bigger

00:08:52.009 --> 00:08:54.289
farms? Yeah, it does improve with scale. Medium

00:08:54.289 --> 00:08:57.850
farms say 100, 250 acres of grain. Maybe breakeven

00:08:57.850 --> 00:09:02.250
is $4 .75 to $5 .60 corn. Payback might drop

00:09:02.250 --> 00:09:06.149
to 8 to 12 years, get up to 250 plus acres. Breakeven

00:09:06.149 --> 00:09:09.809
could be $4 .10 to $4 .80. And maybe you see

00:09:09.809 --> 00:09:12.330
a positive ROI in 5 to 8 years. Scale is definitely

00:09:12.330 --> 00:09:15.009
key. Right. And these numbers assume buying everything

00:09:15.009 --> 00:09:16.970
new. If you've already had some gear or use the

00:09:16.970 --> 00:09:19.159
custom operators, it could look better. For sure.

00:09:19.440 --> 00:09:22.299
If you can use existing planters or drills or

00:09:22.299 --> 00:09:25.080
rely on custom harvesting, that cuts the upfront

00:09:25.080 --> 00:09:28.200
investment significantly. But you still have

00:09:28.200 --> 00:09:30.919
storage costs, handling costs, and with custom

00:09:30.919 --> 00:09:33.320
guys, you're relying on their schedule. Can they

00:09:33.320 --> 00:09:35.600
be there exactly when you need them? That's a

00:09:35.600 --> 00:09:38.250
risk too. This whole thing just screams opportunity

00:09:38.250 --> 00:09:41.710
cost, doesn't it? If you have that capital, is

00:09:41.710 --> 00:09:44.850
grain gear the best use for it on a dairy? That

00:09:44.850 --> 00:09:47.490
is the million -dollar question. Exactly. Limited

00:09:47.490 --> 00:09:49.850
capital. Where does it give you the best return

00:09:49.850 --> 00:09:52.149
for improving milk production, your core business?

00:09:52.710 --> 00:09:56.350
Is it the combine? Or is it new freestalls, better

00:09:56.350 --> 00:09:58.889
ventilation, a more efficient parlor? Things

00:09:58.889 --> 00:10:01.090
that directly touch the cows in the milk check.

00:10:01.519 --> 00:10:04.440
That NYSERDA energy pyramid idea seems relevant

00:10:04.440 --> 00:10:07.000
here. Analyze first, then efficiency upgrades,

00:10:07.320 --> 00:10:09.700
then big capital projects. Makes total sense.

00:10:09.919 --> 00:10:12.919
Go for the low -hanging fruit first. Better bedding,

00:10:12.919 --> 00:10:14.659
improved ventilation, those investments directly

00:10:14.659 --> 00:10:17.399
impact cow health and production. Money tied

00:10:17.399 --> 00:10:19.259
up in a grain drill isn't directly making your

00:10:19.259 --> 00:10:21.340
cows more comfortable or productive. And the

00:10:21.340 --> 00:10:23.200
example they gave of variable speed drive on

00:10:23.200 --> 00:10:25.980
a vacuum pump. Saves significant energy, potentially

00:10:25.980 --> 00:10:28.559
pays back much faster than a whole grain enterprise.

00:10:28.940 --> 00:10:31.720
Exactly. Those targeted efficiency gains within

00:10:31.720 --> 00:10:35.120
the dairy itself often offer quicker, more certain

00:10:35.120 --> 00:10:37.399
returns than launching a whole new farming venture.

00:10:37.639 --> 00:10:39.679
Okay, let's switch focus to the cows themselves.

00:10:40.460 --> 00:10:43.759
High -producing herds and homegrown grain. The

00:10:43.759 --> 00:10:46.440
sources suggest that can be tricky. It's not

00:10:46.440 --> 00:10:49.019
just about growing it cheaply. No, definitely

00:10:49.019 --> 00:10:50.879
not. Think about commercial grain suppliers.

00:10:51.240 --> 00:10:54.419
They blend grain from lots of sources. That gives

00:10:54.419 --> 00:10:56.440
them incredible consistency in the nutritional

00:10:56.440 --> 00:10:59.490
profile. It also dilutes any potential issues

00:10:59.490 --> 00:11:03.309
like mycotoxins from one specific batch. Achieving

00:11:03.309 --> 00:11:06.129
that same consistency on farm with smaller batches

00:11:06.129 --> 00:11:08.690
is just harder. And those high -end cows pushing

00:11:08.690 --> 00:11:11.929
90, 100 pounds or more, they're sensitive, like

00:11:11.929 --> 00:11:14.450
that producer said. Even small energy swings

00:11:14.450 --> 00:11:16.750
in high -moisture corn can mess them up. Totally.

00:11:17.049 --> 00:11:18.669
They have way less wiggle room nutritionally.

00:11:18.690 --> 00:11:20.669
And storage becomes absolutely critical. You

00:11:20.669 --> 00:11:22.990
can't just pile it in an old shed. You need proper

00:11:22.990 --> 00:11:26.169
drying, aeration, monitoring to prevent spoilage

00:11:26.169 --> 00:11:28.470
and quality loss. That loss is called shrink.

00:11:28.769 --> 00:11:31.710
Shrink. Right. That's moisture loss, spoilage,

00:11:31.730 --> 00:11:34.870
pests. And the Wisconsin research said typical

00:11:34.870 --> 00:11:38.309
losses can be, what, 4 % up to 15 % for corn?

00:11:38.529 --> 00:11:40.590
Yeah, depending on storage and management. Even

00:11:40.590 --> 00:11:43.210
a few percent shrink at today's prices adds up

00:11:43.210 --> 00:11:45.509
fast. It eats away at any savings you thought

00:11:45.509 --> 00:11:48.259
you had. So you need the capital for good storage,

00:11:48.299 --> 00:11:50.000
and you need the management time to actually

00:11:50.000 --> 00:11:53.519
keep that grain in top condition. Okay, we've

00:11:53.519 --> 00:11:56.659
painted a challenging picture, but it's not impossible,

00:11:56.860 --> 00:11:59.940
right? The sources did mention some success stories.

00:12:00.120 --> 00:12:02.120
Dairy's making it work. What's their secret?

00:12:02.399 --> 00:12:04.240
Yeah, absolutely. There are successful examples.

00:12:04.720 --> 00:12:07.120
Michigan State Research looked into this. One

00:12:07.120 --> 00:12:09.980
model is the large -scale integrated dairy, like

00:12:09.980 --> 00:12:13.159
that 650 Cow Farm in New York. They farm 1 ,800

00:12:13.159 --> 00:12:16.159
acres. over a thousand of that in grain. A big

00:12:16.159 --> 00:12:17.919
part of their success is just scale. They can

00:12:17.919 --> 00:12:20.399
justify owning the big equipment, multiple combines,

00:12:20.740 --> 00:12:23.080
trucks, etc. Makes sense. Economies of scale

00:12:23.080 --> 00:12:25.240
kick in. What else? They have a dedicated grain

00:12:25.240 --> 00:12:27.580
management team, almost separate from the dairy

00:12:27.580 --> 00:12:30.700
side. It gets the focus it needs. They've invested

00:12:30.700 --> 00:12:33.259
in modern storage with monitoring. Their equipment

00:12:33.259 --> 00:12:35.440
is sized right, so grain harvest doesn't delay

00:12:35.440 --> 00:12:38.539
forage harvest. They use a specialized crop consultant.

00:12:38.980 --> 00:12:42.100
And crucially, they track grain as a separate

00:12:42.100 --> 00:12:44.580
profit center. That farmer said they treat it

00:12:44.580 --> 00:12:47.620
like its own business unit, comparing costs directly

00:12:47.620 --> 00:12:50.000
to market prices. Right, treating it like a distinct

00:12:50.000 --> 00:12:52.159
business. Okay, what about the other example,

00:12:52.340 --> 00:12:54.820
the mid -sized farm in PA? They had a different

00:12:54.820 --> 00:12:57.860
approach. Yeah, the 320 cow dairy. Their success

00:12:57.860 --> 00:13:00.279
comes more from partnerships. They share equipment

00:13:00.279 --> 00:13:03.320
and expertise with neighboring grain farms. This

00:13:03.320 --> 00:13:06.080
avoids that massive upfront capital cost. They

00:13:06.080 --> 00:13:08.279
focus mainly on corn, buy other grains. They

00:13:08.279 --> 00:13:10.200
use custom harvesters, but have agreements that

00:13:10.200 --> 00:13:12.620
prioritize their timing. So collaboration is

00:13:12.620 --> 00:13:15.789
key for them. What else works? Flexibility. They

00:13:15.789 --> 00:13:17.750
can decide late in the season whether to chop

00:13:17.750 --> 00:13:20.370
a field for silage or harvest it for grain, depending

00:13:20.370 --> 00:13:23.370
on needs and conditions. That's huge. They also

00:13:23.370 --> 00:13:25.669
have relationships for emergency grain purchases

00:13:25.669 --> 00:13:28.370
if needed, and they do intensive soil testing

00:13:28.370 --> 00:13:31.250
to maximize manure nutrients. They figure their

00:13:31.250 --> 00:13:33.889
production costs are usually 15 -20 % below market,

00:13:34.029 --> 00:13:37.429
and that silage flexibility is a big win in dry

00:13:37.429 --> 00:13:40.929
years. So clearly no single recipe for success.

00:13:41.429 --> 00:13:44.500
Scale helps. Partnerships help. but both need

00:13:44.500 --> 00:13:47.379
serious management and planning. Now, you mentioned

00:13:47.379 --> 00:13:50.100
regional differences and maybe a research gap.

00:13:50.279 --> 00:13:53.500
That 15 % energy saving in the Northeast, that

00:13:53.500 --> 00:13:55.860
might not apply everywhere. Exactly. The Penn

00:13:55.860 --> 00:13:58.820
State study was, well, in Pennsylvania, a big

00:13:58.820 --> 00:14:00.899
chunk of their energy saving came from not trucking

00:14:00.899 --> 00:14:02.980
grain all the way from the Midwest. If you're

00:14:02.980 --> 00:14:04.779
already in the Midwest or another major grain

00:14:04.779 --> 00:14:07.460
area, that transportation energy saving disappears.

00:14:07.799 --> 00:14:10.019
Your potential advantage is much smaller, maybe

00:14:10.019 --> 00:14:11.799
zero. Right. Depends where you're starting from.

00:14:12.139 --> 00:14:14.919
Yeah. And even Penn State noted that while their

00:14:14.919 --> 00:14:17.120
system using on -farm fuel production lowered

00:14:17.120 --> 00:14:19.980
energy inputs, it needed more land and might

00:14:19.980 --> 00:14:22.460
not actually save money at current fuel prices.

00:14:22.620 --> 00:14:24.720
Again, energy efficiency doesn't always equal

00:14:24.720 --> 00:14:26.879
economic efficiency. They aren't always the same

00:14:26.879 --> 00:14:29.539
thing. Michigan State also compared specialized

00:14:29.539 --> 00:14:32.440
areas versus diversified ones growing feed. What

00:14:32.440 --> 00:14:34.419
did they find? It was interesting. They looked

00:14:34.419 --> 00:14:37.899
at about 246 farms. They found that under 500

00:14:37.899 --> 00:14:40.899
acres, the farms specializing in milk production

00:14:40.899 --> 00:14:44.139
buying most feed actually had an 11 % higher

00:14:44.139 --> 00:14:47.240
return on assets than the diversified farms growing

00:14:47.240 --> 00:14:50.120
lots of grain. But that advantage -vantage for

00:14:50.120 --> 00:14:53.240
the really big farms, over 500 acres, suggests

00:14:53.240 --> 00:14:55.059
that at large scale, the grain economics can

00:14:55.059 --> 00:14:58.039
work. But for smaller to mid -size, specialization

00:14:58.039 --> 00:15:00.620
often paid better. So for many folks listening,

00:15:00.779 --> 00:15:02.840
focusing intensely on milk production might be

00:15:02.840 --> 00:15:04.720
the smarter financial play, according to that

00:15:04.720 --> 00:15:06.779
study. Okay, let's try to boil this down. When

00:15:06.779 --> 00:15:09.340
might growing grain actually make sense? What

00:15:09.340 --> 00:15:11.840
are the green lights? Okay, based on everything,

00:15:12.139 --> 00:15:15.559
favorable conditions would include having significant

00:15:15.559 --> 00:15:18.139
excess land, Truly beyond your forage needs,

00:15:18.340 --> 00:15:20.399
already owning some key grain equipment helps

00:15:20.399 --> 00:15:22.700
a lot. Having management who actually knows grain

00:15:22.700 --> 00:15:25.279
farming or access to good specialists. Being

00:15:25.279 --> 00:15:27.480
located far from grain belts, like the Northeast

00:15:27.480 --> 00:15:30.240
example, where transport costs are high for purchased

00:15:30.240 --> 00:15:32.899
feed. Having the scale maybe two plus acres per

00:15:32.899 --> 00:15:35.220
cow to make equipment ownership viable. Having

00:15:35.220 --> 00:15:37.559
good modern storage at the capital to build it.

00:15:37.740 --> 00:15:40.000
And, you know, having the right soil and climate.

00:15:40.299 --> 00:15:42.559
Plus, enough financial cushion to handle the

00:15:42.559 --> 00:15:44.580
learning curve. Maybe some losses initially.

00:15:45.019 --> 00:15:47.220
That's a solid checklist. Now, the flip side,

00:15:47.399 --> 00:15:49.700
what are the big red flags, the warning signs

00:15:49.700 --> 00:15:52.720
that say danger, Will Robinson? Big warning signs.

00:15:53.159 --> 00:15:55.779
If you're already struggling to make enough high

00:15:55.779 --> 00:15:58.820
-quality forage, if your team equipment, labor,

00:15:59.000 --> 00:16:01.740
management is already stretched thin, if your

00:16:01.740 --> 00:16:04.139
focus is pushing really high production per cow,

00:16:04.419 --> 00:16:07.019
remember that sensitivity issue. If you're in

00:16:07.019 --> 00:16:09.120
a major grain region where it's cheap to buy

00:16:09.120 --> 00:16:12.679
locally, If investing in grain means not investing

00:16:12.679 --> 00:16:15.299
in cow comfort or crucial dairy facility upgrades,

00:16:15.580 --> 00:16:18.759
that's a huge red flag. Lack of good storage.

00:16:19.100 --> 00:16:21.600
Always struggling to get field work done on time.

00:16:21.700 --> 00:16:24.399
And, frankly, having limited financial reserves

00:16:24.399 --> 00:16:27.259
to handle a bad crop year or low prices. It really

00:16:27.259 --> 00:16:29.139
forces an honest look in the mirror, doesn't

00:16:29.139 --> 00:16:31.779
it? At your resources, your skills, your farm's

00:16:31.779 --> 00:16:33.820
core strengths. Like the source said, success

00:16:33.820 --> 00:16:35.899
here isn't luck. It's about a clear -eyed assessment

00:16:35.899 --> 00:16:38.940
of your unique situation. Exactly. Dr. Stevenson

00:16:38.940 --> 00:16:41.080
from Wisconsin quoted in the source, summed it

00:16:41.080 --> 00:16:43.720
up well. The advantage varies hugely by size,

00:16:43.840 --> 00:16:46.120
management, region. He said the winners tend

00:16:46.120 --> 00:16:48.779
to be either intensely focused on milk or big

00:16:48.779 --> 00:16:50.659
enough to run both milk and grain effectively

00:16:50.659 --> 00:16:53.220
as separate, well -managed enterprises. So those

00:16:53.220 --> 00:16:56.159
core questions keep coming back. Does this help

00:16:56.159 --> 00:16:59.379
my main mission making milk? Do I really have

00:16:59.379 --> 00:17:01.539
the capacity for this complexity? Where does

00:17:01.539 --> 00:17:04.420
my capital do the most good? Maybe for some,

00:17:04.500 --> 00:17:07.240
that 15 % energy saving in the Northeast, if

00:17:07.240 --> 00:17:09.599
they have the scale and setup, aligns energy

00:17:09.599 --> 00:17:12.640
goals and economics. But for lots of others,

00:17:12.779 --> 00:17:15.200
focusing on the cows, optimizing that core dairy

00:17:15.200 --> 00:17:18.220
business is probably still the best bet. The

00:17:18.220 --> 00:17:20.339
truth isn't always convenient, as we like to

00:17:20.339 --> 00:17:22.660
say at The Bullvine. That's spot on. And look,

00:17:22.680 --> 00:17:24.500
before you get serious, there are some pointed

00:17:24.500 --> 00:17:26.720
questions you absolutely need to ask specific

00:17:26.720 --> 00:17:29.099
people. Right. Like your equipment dealer. Don't

00:17:29.099 --> 00:17:31.099
just ask the price. No way. Ask for the total

00:17:31.099 --> 00:17:33.619
annual cost of ownership depreciation, maintenance,

00:17:33.759 --> 00:17:36.119
finance. Ask how many acres they think you really

00:17:36.119 --> 00:17:38.579
need to justify that machine. Ask about custom

00:17:38.579 --> 00:17:41.160
work options as an alternative. And crucially,

00:17:41.279 --> 00:17:43.519
what's their parts and service situation during

00:17:43.519 --> 00:17:45.960
harvest? Can they keep you running when time

00:17:45.960 --> 00:17:48.240
is critical? Good ones. And your nutritionist.

00:17:48.359 --> 00:17:51.359
You need a frank talk. What quality variations

00:17:51.359 --> 00:17:54.220
should you expect from homegrown grain? How will

00:17:54.220 --> 00:17:56.339
that impact your high producers? What testing

00:17:56.339 --> 00:17:58.740
should you plan on? What storage and processing

00:17:58.740 --> 00:18:00.859
methods did they recommend for your setup and

00:18:00.859 --> 00:18:03.720
your cows? Okay. And definitely your financial

00:18:03.720 --> 00:18:06.740
advisor or lender. Yeah. Compare this investment

00:18:06.740 --> 00:18:08.779
directly to other uses for that capital on the

00:18:08.779 --> 00:18:11.339
dairy side. Calculate your realistic break -even

00:18:11.339 --> 00:18:14.079
cost, all in. How does the extra debt affect

00:18:14.079 --> 00:18:16.339
your overall financial health, your flexibility,

00:18:16.660 --> 00:18:19.400
and what risk management tools... crop insurance

00:18:19.400 --> 00:18:21.940
marketing strategies should you use for the grain

00:18:21.940 --> 00:18:24.740
side? Okay, let's quickly recap the biggest takeaways

00:18:24.740 --> 00:18:28.660
then. One, potential 15 % energy savings in feed

00:18:28.660 --> 00:18:31.099
production, especially far from grain belt, but

00:18:31.099 --> 00:18:33.019
that doesn't always equal economic savings for

00:18:33.019 --> 00:18:37.019
the farm. Two, equipment costs are huge, 300k,

00:18:37.099 --> 00:18:39.599
500k for just a combine needs scale. Payback

00:18:39.599 --> 00:18:42.380
can be very long, 8 -15 plus years for smaller

00:18:42.380 --> 00:18:45.950
farms. Three, Successful integrated farms often

00:18:45.950 --> 00:18:47.990
have separate grain management, modern storage,

00:18:48.170 --> 00:18:50.190
and are either large -scale or use partnerships

00:18:50.190 --> 00:18:53.630
effectively. 4. High -producing herds are sensitive

00:18:53.630 --> 00:18:56.349
to grain quality variations. Specialized milk

00:18:56.349 --> 00:18:58.349
production is often more profitable under 500

00:18:58.349 --> 00:19:01.609
acres. 5. Use those checklists' favorable conditions

00:19:01.609 --> 00:19:03.650
versus warning signs to assess your own farm

00:19:03.650 --> 00:19:05.849
realistically. Exactly. It's that trade -off.

00:19:05.930 --> 00:19:08.490
Energy potential versus financial risk and management

00:19:08.490 --> 00:19:11.150
complexity. Penn State showed the energy angle

00:19:11.150 --> 00:19:13.369
in one region, but economics depend on your scale.

00:19:13.720 --> 00:19:16.259
Setup. Management. Success seems possible at

00:19:16.259 --> 00:19:19.160
600 plus cows with dedicated resources, but smaller

00:19:19.160 --> 00:19:21.960
farms face big hurdles with costs and ROI. It

00:19:21.960 --> 00:19:23.779
always comes back to, does grain growing advance

00:19:23.779 --> 00:19:26.359
or distract from making milk? Data often suggests

00:19:26.359 --> 00:19:28.680
specialization wins for dairies under 500 acres.

00:19:28.880 --> 00:19:31.400
Well, that was certainly a deep dive into the

00:19:31.400 --> 00:19:33.859
grain growing question. Thanks for joining us

00:19:33.859 --> 00:19:36.099
as we sorted through the pros, cons, and complexities.

00:19:36.799 --> 00:19:39.480
It is definitely not a simple decision, and hopefully

00:19:39.480 --> 00:19:41.460
this conversation gave you some valuable things

00:19:41.460 --> 00:19:43.799
to think about for your own operation. Yeah,

00:19:43.900 --> 00:19:46.240
we really hope so. We definitely encourage you

00:19:46.240 --> 00:19:48.200
to think about the points that hit home for you

00:19:48.200 --> 00:19:50.940
and talk them over with your own advisors, your

00:19:50.940 --> 00:19:54.440
lender, nutritionist, consultant. Consider this

00:19:54.440 --> 00:19:57.079
discussion just the start. It's a big strategic

00:19:57.079 --> 00:19:59.970
question for your dairy's future. So after chewing

00:19:59.970 --> 00:20:01.869
on all this, are you leaning more towards the

00:20:01.869 --> 00:20:04.349
potential of homegrown grain? Or are you thinking

00:20:04.349 --> 00:20:06.990
it's better to double down on optimizing everything

00:20:06.990 --> 00:20:09.690
that goes into that bulk tank? The answer, as

00:20:09.690 --> 00:20:11.930
we've seen, is really unique to your farm's story.

00:20:12.130 --> 00:20:14.670
Until our next deep dive, keep farming smart.

00:20:25.130 --> 00:20:27.450
including our exclusive decision checklist and

00:20:27.450 --> 00:20:30.049
equipment cost breakdown, visit thebullvine .com.

00:20:30.430 --> 00:20:33.789
Before we go, here's your takeaway. Growing grain

00:20:33.789 --> 00:20:36.809
isn't about pride, it's about profit. For some,

00:20:36.869 --> 00:20:40.490
it's a lifeline. For others, a distraction. Only

00:20:40.490 --> 00:20:43.630
your land, labor, and ledger can decide. Next

00:20:43.630 --> 00:20:46.230
week, we're exposing how carbon credits are paying

00:20:46.230 --> 00:20:50.589
dairies $1 ,200 per cow and why 80 % of farmers

00:20:50.589 --> 00:20:53.869
are getting scammed. Until then, this is Hostname

00:20:53.869 --> 00:20:56.559
reminding you, In dairy, you don't get what you

00:20:56.559 --> 00:20:59.480
deserve. You get what you negotiate. Innovate

00:20:59.480 --> 00:21:00.319
or evaporate.
