So we have Keir Starmer's Labour. What have they done in the last month? It's pretty horrific
their record so far. They've sort of made it worse. And we've got nationwide rioting
and protests, you know, up and down the UK. We've also got protests in Northern and Southern
Ireland. It's at least 12. They've effectively forced schools to close due to educational
taxes, this VAT on private schools, which would also have massive pressure when parents
make the hard decision that they can't afford it and they'd have to go to state schools.
We've got still a massive number of illegal immigrants crossing. It's an all time high
of 17,000, even though the last idea may not have been great, but it was a deterrent and
people were going to other countries. We've got a GP strike for the first time in 80 years.
I'm also hearing that a lot of drugs have six weeks of use before we run out of them
because drugs aren't being ordered across the board. So when you want to fill your prescription
or get your relevant drugs at the relevant locations, we're probably going to run out
in about six weeks. So as well as the sort of the vulnerable building, our society who
will be worse off due to this new government, we've got the elderly, so the disabled and
the vulnerable will be left to freeze after fuel subsidy is cut. Now, not many people
are eligible for pension credits. I think you have to have absolutely nothing, no real
savings or any private pension coming in because you won't be eligible. This fictitious idea
that they've got a 20 billion black hole to justify these tax increases. I mean, the information
was freely available in March. Things probably wouldn't have changed that much. And you're
looking at potential hypotheticals because depending on what the governments do, the
receipts will potentially be more and potentially less. So I mean, from what I've seen on the
TV and my involvement, you have a two tier government and policing. Is that an all time
high? So depending on how they feel about a particular group, they would have a soft
policing stance and another group that have a strong policing stance, as well as a lot
of these police should be impartial and they're saying things that they shouldn't be able
to do on the job and they're doing the relevant actions that the police should be impartial
and uphold the law, not have their relevant perspective on the law. And you've got this
position where almost a day or two later, there was a nice jolly to America. There's
a lot of blind from here, there and everywhere and the hypocritical thing that we have to
sort out climate change. Well, it's got to start at home. And if he was traveling by
other means by car or by railway, he would actually pick up on the feelings of the nation.
I mean, from my mind, having you layers and other things being introduced is just a way
to actually tax us and get more money to be put into certain avenues that they shouldn't
be put in. I think the you layers is a bit of a mistake. And the other thing of utilizing
face recognition to actually control and determine what select individuals are allowed to do.
It removes their freedom of speech and freedom of action. And this has been used in the past
where you've had, you know, I mean, on the one hand, you've had the freedom for people
to have sort of nonviolent protest, but because of the economic impact they have been putting
jail. So effectively, the you allowed your freedom if it doesn't cost enough. And the
full idea of facial recognition to identify individuals and then restrict their movement
is a warrant. But it is something that has been noted by the in text if you search it
under 2025 and 2030 about the ways that the powers, as I call them, are going to control
us. That's a bit of an eye opener, and it will give you an idea of what they're doing.
But the other thing is to give a 20% increase to the junior doctors is going to be inflationary
because it's not just going to be them. You're going to get a silent agreement with all the
other fire brigade, the police, other NHS individuals, let alone the somewhat secret
pay rises for the civil service. But the other thing that they're keeping quiet is that they're
one of the few people that get defined benefits. So depending on your salary range, I think
the defined benefit amount that is earmarked for any individual is between 20% and 29%.
So that's a huge increase in the pension cost. But these are only sums earmarked because
effectively, unlike non-defined benefit pensions, it's effectively how well that money does
in the stock market over time, which could be good and which could be bad. It's a massive
risk where sometimes you can see half your pension savings go back in smoke. But if you
define benefit effectively, if you work one year, that's one year of pension benefit.
And that's all wrapped up into normally, they take your final three years and come out with
an equation is that is the average salary that you've had. And then depending on how
many years you've actually built up, you would get a fixed agreed amount every single year.
But the interesting thing is that if you have that amount of money, it's really expensive
to actually keep up with inflation and the retail price index, which these the government
pensions actually keep up with inflation and they have nice little increases and so forth.
So in true terms, their salary is head and shoulders above other people. Because say
you're on 30,000 and then you get a pretty strong pension in comparison to have the pension
as well as holiday at some such strong levels, you're going to have to be earning north of
fifty thousand pounds to compensate. So if you could comment on how you think that the
government have done in the first sort of month that they've been in power, the actual
communications that they have done, the actual tax raises that they said they wouldn't introduce,
as well as other items which I haven't discussed because I'm going to be discussed when they
become more into light. So I would probably give them probably about two or three out
of ten, because at least on some of these policies, we're going to get the relevant
access that we need to our junior doctors. But I think the whole principle of the NHS
has been forgotten. It's supposed to determine and check, you know, and advise sort of lifestyle
choices as well as to actually check our health on a yearly basis rather than currently you
effectively only go when you're ill. It should be sort of a regular six month and you say
right don't do your blood pressure, do your weight, do your blood, do your breathing,
etc. And then we can make assessments earlier on, rather than when you are sort of fairly
ill or critically ill. And that takes a lot of changes. But unfortunately, from my perspective,
a lot of the treatments are just to contain the patient, sort of the opioids or to say,
oh, well, you know, here you go, take some of this or put this on. And, you know, come
back if you have a problem. It's more like containment rather than solving the real issue
and effectively if you do that, you're going to save the money in the long run. So please
subscribe to my channel, please share this video with other people and please comment
because from that I can create other videos which may be insightful for to you. Thank
you very much. Bye bye.