1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:03,000
If you liked this video, please share and subscribe to my channel!

2
00:00:30,000 --> 00:00:37,600
Hi, it's great to be in your studio finally.

3
00:00:37,600 --> 00:00:41,560
I've seen so many pictures of it from all these different angles that it's fantastic

4
00:00:41,560 --> 00:00:44,080
to be here in person.

5
00:00:44,080 --> 00:00:47,400
So glad to have you finally here to see the work in the flesh.

6
00:00:47,400 --> 00:00:48,680
Yes, me too.

7
00:00:48,680 --> 00:00:55,360
Speaking of the work in the flesh, I wanted to maybe first start by asking you about all

8
00:00:55,360 --> 00:01:01,600
the different elements that I see around, all these fragments of things.

9
00:01:01,600 --> 00:01:04,840
And when I mean things, they really are completely random things.

10
00:01:04,840 --> 00:01:08,600
I'm looking at cut out yoga mats on the floor.

11
00:01:08,600 --> 00:01:11,000
I'm looking at leaves.

12
00:01:11,000 --> 00:01:14,040
I'm looking at little pieces of sequins everywhere.

13
00:01:14,040 --> 00:01:15,360
I'm looking at threads.

14
00:01:15,360 --> 00:01:19,520
Yeah, there is a lot going on in the studio.

15
00:01:19,520 --> 00:01:22,680
And as well as sketches on the wall.

16
00:01:22,680 --> 00:01:28,320
It's like fragments is a very key part of your practice and of what the work means.

17
00:01:28,320 --> 00:01:34,600
So can you walk us through the meaning of fragments and how fragments are integrated

18
00:01:34,600 --> 00:01:35,600
in your work?

19
00:01:35,600 --> 00:01:36,600
Yeah, absolutely.

20
00:01:36,600 --> 00:01:41,360
So I often collect found objects that I'm attracted to instantly.

21
00:01:41,360 --> 00:01:46,160
And I feel this desire to bring them back to the studio, having no idea exactly what's

22
00:01:46,160 --> 00:01:47,800
going to become of them.

23
00:01:47,800 --> 00:01:51,520
I'm initially attracted to things that I find beautiful.

24
00:01:51,520 --> 00:01:56,600
And because I often think about notions, notions of beauty, I kind of unpack the objects I

25
00:01:56,600 --> 00:02:01,680
bring back to the studio, but by taking them completely apart.

26
00:02:01,680 --> 00:02:08,200
So this is quite a laborious and meditative process whereby I'll sit on my yoga mat and

27
00:02:08,200 --> 00:02:10,760
take an object completely to pieces.

28
00:02:10,760 --> 00:02:12,680
I completely fragmented.

29
00:02:12,680 --> 00:02:17,000
And this means that each fragment will have in a way its own agency and can become part

30
00:02:17,000 --> 00:02:19,680
of a completely new landscape.

31
00:02:19,680 --> 00:02:25,200
So what you can see around the studio is different objects I've collected over the years that

32
00:02:25,200 --> 00:02:30,960
I've taken up, that I've taken to pieces and they kind of unpredictably become part of

33
00:02:30,960 --> 00:02:32,200
the surface.

34
00:02:32,200 --> 00:02:38,900
And actually, I never really know what the end result will be of taking the object apart.

35
00:02:38,900 --> 00:02:44,560
But all I know is that these fragments will have agency to start talking about a variety

36
00:02:44,560 --> 00:02:50,040
of different subjects, whether that be pink dolphins or an archaeological fragment found

37
00:02:50,040 --> 00:02:51,200
in a lefcina.

38
00:02:51,200 --> 00:02:55,480
I try to think about different notions through the surface and through these fragments.

39
00:02:55,480 --> 00:02:59,800
So that's why they're kind of spread around my studio because they always have the potential

40
00:02:59,800 --> 00:03:01,920
to become part of the next work.

41
00:03:01,920 --> 00:03:03,800
So walk me through this idea.

42
00:03:03,800 --> 00:03:07,380
You're, let's say, out and about in Athens running an errand.

43
00:03:07,380 --> 00:03:08,880
How do you actually look?

44
00:03:08,880 --> 00:03:13,480
Well, I'm one of those people that is generally just kind of looking around on the floor.

45
00:03:13,480 --> 00:03:18,640
I mean, I'm kind of attracted in general to waste and to detritus.

46
00:03:18,640 --> 00:03:23,680
And I've always picked up things as a child and brought crap back to the house.

47
00:03:23,680 --> 00:03:25,040
So this isn't something new.

48
00:03:25,040 --> 00:03:28,400
It's something that I've always kind of done is bringing things back that I find really

49
00:03:28,400 --> 00:03:30,040
beautiful and I don't know why.

50
00:03:30,040 --> 00:03:34,080
And I end up thinking about that as it sits in my studio for long periods of time.

51
00:03:34,080 --> 00:03:39,520
But like a few days ago, I found a pink birdcage in the trash near my house.

52
00:03:39,520 --> 00:03:42,080
And it's the most beautiful thing I've ever seen, really.

53
00:03:42,080 --> 00:03:45,040
It's like the shadows of the lines through the birdcage.

54
00:03:45,040 --> 00:03:46,040
Where is it?

55
00:03:46,040 --> 00:03:47,040
It's in my house still.

56
00:03:47,040 --> 00:03:48,760
I need to bring it.

57
00:03:48,760 --> 00:03:52,560
But kind of anything has the capacity, I think, for beauty.

58
00:03:52,560 --> 00:03:57,840
And I love the idea of repurposing things that were on their way to become absolute

59
00:03:57,840 --> 00:03:58,840
decay.

60
00:03:58,840 --> 00:04:03,580
So, yes, if I'm going on a walk, like you say, running an errand, if something catches

61
00:04:03,580 --> 00:04:07,940
my eye, I will without a doubt bring it back to the studio no matter what the size of this

62
00:04:07,940 --> 00:04:11,100
thing is, whether it could be tiny and it could be large.

63
00:04:11,100 --> 00:04:19,280
So is it an idea of basically needing to share or to show the beauty that you see in that

64
00:04:19,280 --> 00:04:24,680
work to more people because it's a discarded object that is supposedly valueless and therefore

65
00:04:24,680 --> 00:04:25,680
without beauty?

66
00:04:25,680 --> 00:04:26,680
Exactly.

67
00:04:26,680 --> 00:04:31,280
In a way, I feel like I'm trying to slow down the process because I've been thinking for

68
00:04:31,280 --> 00:04:34,760
years about the fast pace of object to trash.

69
00:04:34,760 --> 00:04:38,800
And because obviously as consumers, things become trash before they've even reached that

70
00:04:38,800 --> 00:04:40,800
point in their life as objects.

71
00:04:40,800 --> 00:04:45,920
So in a way, I'm trying to honor things around us that have too quickly become trash, which

72
00:04:45,920 --> 00:04:49,120
I see some kind of beauty within them.

73
00:04:49,120 --> 00:04:53,200
And then I unpack their beauty and try to show in a way others their beauty through

74
00:04:53,200 --> 00:04:54,600
the surface.

75
00:04:54,600 --> 00:04:57,400
So this could happen directly or more indirectly.

76
00:04:57,400 --> 00:05:01,260
Like my painting could be an allusion to an object or to the life of an object.

77
00:05:01,260 --> 00:05:02,560
But I'm trying to kind of capture.

78
00:05:02,560 --> 00:05:06,880
So I might take the object apart and then it physically becomes part of the work.

79
00:05:06,880 --> 00:05:11,680
Or I might be using it to paint over and over again until I've exhausted it.

80
00:05:11,680 --> 00:05:17,240
So Lydia, another thing that struck me when I first saw your work, but now that I'm here

81
00:05:17,240 --> 00:05:23,760
seeing it in the flesh, is the incredible amount of layering that you have worked with.

82
00:05:23,760 --> 00:05:27,080
You've spent time in TINOS at the sculpture school.

83
00:05:27,080 --> 00:05:32,080
There's many different dimensions and the fragments that you salvage are multi-dimensional.

84
00:05:32,080 --> 00:05:37,080
But what I find really interesting in each and every one of the works that I'm seeing

85
00:05:37,080 --> 00:05:45,400
here is that they are multi-layered while being displayed on a two-dimensional canvas.

86
00:05:45,400 --> 00:05:49,600
But even the canvas itself, which is unstretched, has another life.

87
00:05:49,600 --> 00:05:54,360
There's a kind of an infinity, in a sense, where things can continue to be layered and

88
00:05:54,360 --> 00:05:56,000
layered and layered.

89
00:05:56,000 --> 00:05:59,520
Can you dissect this a little bit more?

90
00:05:59,520 --> 00:06:00,520
Yeah, sure.

91
00:06:00,520 --> 00:06:04,040
I mean, there are layers in my work, you're absolutely right.

92
00:06:04,040 --> 00:06:08,280
And in a way, for me to be able to reference all these kinds of different objects which

93
00:06:08,280 --> 00:06:11,240
have their own histories, there have to be layers involved.

94
00:06:11,240 --> 00:06:17,080
For me to be able to think about the relationship between scenes that I've witnessed or objects

95
00:06:17,080 --> 00:06:21,560
that I've picked up, and in a way because my work has a lot to do with memory as well

96
00:06:21,560 --> 00:06:26,280
and memory of places, there has to be layers for me to be able to kind of wedge them all

97
00:06:26,280 --> 00:06:27,280
together.

98
00:06:27,280 --> 00:06:32,600
So obviously in my work, there's always thread, thread plays a crucial role in my work.

99
00:06:32,600 --> 00:06:37,240
Because generally I'm very attracted to line and the potential of line, and that's where

100
00:06:37,240 --> 00:06:38,680
the grid comes in as well.

101
00:06:38,680 --> 00:06:44,080
So in a way, one of those layers, one of the crucial layers is the grid, art historically

102
00:06:44,080 --> 00:06:50,360
as well, but also in terms of me being able to control my own process, I need to implement

103
00:06:50,360 --> 00:06:53,320
some kind of structure in my work, and that's one of the layers.

104
00:06:53,320 --> 00:06:56,640
And is the structure connected to a story?

105
00:06:56,640 --> 00:07:02,800
The structure of the grid is the literal way in which I'm able to allow the painting to

106
00:07:02,800 --> 00:07:03,800
grow.

107
00:07:03,800 --> 00:07:09,320
So that's kind of a technique I use to be able to connect disparate things.

108
00:07:09,320 --> 00:07:15,160
In terms of the acrylics, for instance, that I use on the surface, this is the more uncontrolled

109
00:07:15,160 --> 00:07:19,200
layer where the paint spreads in its own way.

110
00:07:19,200 --> 00:07:24,880
I can't really control it because it's not primed, so the paint seeps through the surface

111
00:07:24,880 --> 00:07:26,840
in whichever way it will.

112
00:07:26,840 --> 00:07:31,440
But then when I start using graphite, or I start using sequins from a throwaway skirt

113
00:07:31,440 --> 00:07:35,800
or hedgehog spines, all these things are very deliberate gestures on the surface which I

114
00:07:35,800 --> 00:07:42,640
can control, but those are inextricably linked with the idea of textile, and fragments becoming

115
00:07:42,640 --> 00:07:44,120
a textile as well.

116
00:07:44,120 --> 00:07:49,280
So I like to think I'm in the realm of working between painting and textile.

117
00:07:49,280 --> 00:07:54,880
But tell me, you have in some cases started a work where there wasn't enough space for

118
00:07:54,880 --> 00:08:00,480
you to actually create what you wanted to, so you've had to add space, which is really

119
00:08:00,480 --> 00:08:06,040
interesting where you've had to stitch and expand the space in an ad hoc traditional

120
00:08:06,040 --> 00:08:07,040
way.

121
00:08:07,040 --> 00:08:09,280
I mean, it's almost like a collage of canvas.

122
00:08:09,280 --> 00:08:12,120
But then the stitching itself becomes part of the work.

123
00:08:12,120 --> 00:08:13,120
Yeah, absolutely.

124
00:08:13,120 --> 00:08:17,680
Well, I'm interested in a way in everything showing, and that's why, for instance, with

125
00:08:17,680 --> 00:08:24,160
the grid, I never go and erase evidence of having used a grid to unravel the surface.

126
00:08:24,160 --> 00:08:29,560
You know, if I work on some arbitrary size of canvas, I like the idea that the gestures

127
00:08:29,560 --> 00:08:34,560
that I've made will kind of then interfere with the rest of it, and if I need to add

128
00:08:34,560 --> 00:08:40,480
more surface to it, then I will, because the marks need to expand, they need to go on further.

129
00:08:40,480 --> 00:08:45,480
But because my work is quite unplanned, there's a lot of room, in a way, for unpredictable

130
00:08:45,480 --> 00:08:50,000
gestures, and that's part of the process that I really enjoy, that a painting could start

131
00:08:50,000 --> 00:08:53,880
off quite small, but then become much larger through fragments coming together.

132
00:08:53,880 --> 00:08:58,040
So in a way, the notion of the fragment is something which is involved in the whole process,

133
00:08:58,040 --> 00:09:02,800
not just the physical act of bringing fragments back to the studio.

134
00:09:02,800 --> 00:09:07,920
But tell me something, when you talk about fragments, it takes me to, somehow, archaeology,

135
00:09:07,920 --> 00:09:17,240
artifacts, broken pieces of an ancient sculpture, and we're sitting here in Athens, and both

136
00:09:17,240 --> 00:09:24,680
antiquity and also Byzantine culture has played a role in your work, in forming your aesthetics

137
00:09:24,680 --> 00:09:27,040
and the research that you've done.

138
00:09:27,040 --> 00:09:30,640
Can you elaborate a little bit more on this relationship and the connections?

139
00:09:30,640 --> 00:09:34,720
Yeah, absolutely, and what you're saying is really important, because actually, I remember

140
00:09:34,720 --> 00:09:42,360
going to museums growing up as a kid in Athens and being very attracted to fragments of sculptures,

141
00:09:42,360 --> 00:09:50,480
where there was pieces of a frieze, for instance, that were displayed alongside casts of what

142
00:09:50,480 --> 00:09:51,960
would be the whole.

143
00:09:51,960 --> 00:09:57,840
So there was always this idea of how was the whole recreated for the purpose of showing

144
00:09:57,840 --> 00:10:01,800
an audience what the frieze looked like in ancient Greece, for example.

145
00:10:01,800 --> 00:10:08,720
And that kind of possibility and trying to envision what things looked like back in ancient

146
00:10:08,720 --> 00:10:13,160
Greece is something that sparked my interest in finding fragments of everyday life and

147
00:10:13,160 --> 00:10:15,800
what kind of narrative they belonged to.

148
00:10:15,800 --> 00:10:20,280
And I think, in general, there's something so captivating by these archaeological fragments,

149
00:10:20,280 --> 00:10:25,800
where we don't know exactly what the rest of the statue or the monument looked like.

150
00:10:25,800 --> 00:10:29,920
So it's up to us to use our imagination and facts that we have on that period to piece

151
00:10:29,920 --> 00:10:32,760
together what the whole would be.

152
00:10:32,760 --> 00:10:38,680
So I'm constantly, in a way, trying to imagine a new whole for these fragments that I collect.

153
00:10:38,680 --> 00:10:40,320
But it's a story that you create.

154
00:10:40,320 --> 00:10:41,960
It's a story that I create.

155
00:10:41,960 --> 00:10:45,200
Sometimes it doesn't feel that way, because when I bring back someone to the studio, it

156
00:10:45,200 --> 00:10:47,680
feels like I'm just telling the story of that object.

157
00:10:47,680 --> 00:10:49,240
I'm not making it up.

158
00:10:49,240 --> 00:10:55,760
Maybe that sounds crazy, but I feel like a duty to a thing, a duty to an object.

159
00:10:55,760 --> 00:11:01,360
And it does become part of a new narrative, in a way, but using its kind of pure existence,

160
00:11:01,360 --> 00:11:02,800
if I may say.

161
00:11:02,800 --> 00:11:08,880
So in terms of the narrative of these found objects and what can be created out of them,

162
00:11:08,880 --> 00:11:12,320
we've had a conversation where you've talked about being influenced by the whole Art in

163
00:11:12,320 --> 00:11:17,480
Povera movement and the kind of the philosophy behind what they were trying to communicate.

164
00:11:17,480 --> 00:11:22,320
Can you say a little bit more about how that feeds into your work or how that allows you

165
00:11:22,320 --> 00:11:24,360
to create work?

166
00:11:24,360 --> 00:11:25,680
Yeah, certainly.

167
00:11:25,680 --> 00:11:32,080
So I kind of started looking into the Art of Povera movement when I was at Goldsmith.

168
00:11:32,080 --> 00:11:36,720
And obviously I had known about the work of Yannis Kounelis, for instance, but I was particularly

169
00:11:36,720 --> 00:11:42,200
attracted to the way in which he had used mundane materials and given them a sort of

170
00:11:42,200 --> 00:11:45,120
extravagance in the space that they were exhibited.

171
00:11:45,120 --> 00:11:51,520
So I think that was kind of a moment whereby seeing his work and seeing how the everyday

172
00:11:51,520 --> 00:11:58,160
could be incorporated into a work using exactly the colour of the material and not changing

173
00:11:58,160 --> 00:12:03,520
it in any way, I think that made me start being able to use found objects and appreciate

174
00:12:03,520 --> 00:12:07,160
them as they are and not intervening with them too much.

175
00:12:07,160 --> 00:12:11,600
So actually the only way in which I intervene with the actual object would be the fragmentation

176
00:12:11,600 --> 00:12:16,400
of it and taking it apart, but not actually changing the colour of it, for instance.

177
00:12:16,400 --> 00:12:22,960
So I'd say that the Art of Povera movement influenced my confidence in using found objects

178
00:12:22,960 --> 00:12:24,320
that I'm attracted to.

179
00:12:24,320 --> 00:12:29,720
And in referencing the grid with a capital G, many different artists come to mind, but

180
00:12:29,720 --> 00:12:34,920
in particular I would say Agnes Martin because it's also somebody I think that you are interested

181
00:12:34,920 --> 00:12:35,920
in her practice.

182
00:12:35,920 --> 00:12:41,720
Well, you know, one of the main things I was attracted to with Agnes Martin's work was

183
00:12:41,720 --> 00:12:48,040
the titles of her work and for instance a painting of hers called Little Sister, one

184
00:12:48,040 --> 00:12:49,680
of her earlier works.

185
00:12:49,680 --> 00:12:54,840
I just really liked the kind of intimacy of her titles and how they linked with the grid.

186
00:12:54,840 --> 00:13:01,320
In a way she kind of saw the whole world through the grid and I see the potential of line like

187
00:13:01,320 --> 00:13:02,320
that as well.

188
00:13:02,320 --> 00:13:08,240
So in a way her sensibility of the grid is something I felt very attracted to and mesmerised

189
00:13:08,240 --> 00:13:09,240
by.

190
00:13:09,240 --> 00:13:12,360
Can you define to me what the grid is for you?

191
00:13:12,360 --> 00:13:15,280
For me the grid is the answer to how I work.

192
00:13:15,280 --> 00:13:20,640
So thinking about many disparate things at the same time, whether that be a throwaway

193
00:13:20,640 --> 00:13:25,320
object and how that links with a Byzantine motif for instance, the grid will allow these

194
00:13:25,320 --> 00:13:26,940
things to have a dialogue.

195
00:13:26,940 --> 00:13:31,520
So in a way the grid for me is allowing for a dialogue to take place between seemingly

196
00:13:31,520 --> 00:13:32,520
disparate things.

197
00:13:32,520 --> 00:13:34,520
So is it like a conduit?

198
00:13:34,520 --> 00:13:35,880
Yeah, it is.

199
00:13:35,880 --> 00:13:37,240
It's like a gateway.

200
00:13:37,240 --> 00:13:40,280
Maybe a gateway is a good way of describing it.

201
00:13:40,280 --> 00:13:45,400
Because even though my work seems completely abstract, there is a structure underlying

202
00:13:45,400 --> 00:13:52,080
the abstraction and there's a structure underlying the gestures that take place on the surface.

203
00:13:52,080 --> 00:13:58,000
So the grid in a way is a fundamental structure to think about the disparate notions that

204
00:13:58,000 --> 00:14:02,480
I'm looking at and it's a way for things to coexist.

205
00:14:02,480 --> 00:14:05,840
But interestingly you can use many different things to create the grid.

206
00:14:05,840 --> 00:14:09,960
It's not about making it just out of graphite or out of a pencil.

207
00:14:09,960 --> 00:14:10,960
Is that correct?

208
00:14:10,960 --> 00:14:11,960
It is correct.

209
00:14:11,960 --> 00:14:16,560
Initially though, because my works start off with these kind of arbitrary gestures and

210
00:14:16,560 --> 00:14:21,100
then the grid comes along afterwards, the grid is kind of dependent on what these gestures

211
00:14:21,100 --> 00:14:25,320
are like as well, aesthetically, materialistically.

212
00:14:25,320 --> 00:14:28,840
So as I had mentioned before as well, the grid kind of might come a quarter of the way

213
00:14:28,840 --> 00:14:31,640
in or it might come a bit later in the work.

214
00:14:31,640 --> 00:14:38,400
But the grid generally is what allows the fragments from the found object to be placed.

215
00:14:38,400 --> 00:14:43,560
So for instance the sequence moves along the grid and that's why they have a symmetry as

216
00:14:43,560 --> 00:14:44,560
well.

217
00:14:44,560 --> 00:14:48,420
There's a mathematical kind of symmetry in the way that the sequence spreads.

218
00:14:48,420 --> 00:14:50,160
Those parts are not random.

219
00:14:50,160 --> 00:14:55,080
So the grid allows for this balance between control and abstraction.

220
00:14:55,080 --> 00:15:00,680
One thing that really speaks and is so wonderfully refreshing in your work is your choice of

221
00:15:00,680 --> 00:15:04,200
colors, particularly pink.

222
00:15:04,200 --> 00:15:09,120
And I love the way that you have, I think, spent a lot of time looking into pink and

223
00:15:09,120 --> 00:15:13,560
the meaning of the color pink because it's not just about Barbie and the current fashion

224
00:15:13,560 --> 00:15:15,120
of pink, let's say.

225
00:15:15,120 --> 00:15:16,120
Yeah.

226
00:15:16,120 --> 00:15:21,920
But also in terms of the whole connection with spirituality, with the Byzantine liturgy

227
00:15:21,920 --> 00:15:25,640
as well as in connection with blood and dolphins.

228
00:15:25,640 --> 00:15:28,040
Can you just talk to us a little bit about pink?

229
00:15:28,040 --> 00:15:29,040
Yeah, absolutely.

230
00:15:29,040 --> 00:15:36,040
Well, I initially became interested in pink when my grandfather was dying in the hospital.

231
00:15:36,040 --> 00:15:39,480
My first actual connection with pink was through death.

232
00:15:39,480 --> 00:15:44,920
And my grandfather died of sepsis and watching the way the color of his skin gradually changed,

233
00:15:44,920 --> 00:15:49,880
I suddenly became very attracted to an interest in the role of pink in decay.

234
00:15:49,880 --> 00:15:54,360
So in a way, thinking about pink started from something very dark.

235
00:15:54,360 --> 00:15:59,760
But I actually started to find a lot of comfort when my grandfather passed away in pink.

236
00:15:59,760 --> 00:16:02,600
For me, pink has this solace about it.

237
00:16:02,600 --> 00:16:04,560
It's a very comforting color.

238
00:16:04,560 --> 00:16:06,280
It's an unthreatening color.

239
00:16:06,280 --> 00:16:10,440
And so there's a personal significance in pink, and that's how it all began.

240
00:16:10,440 --> 00:16:14,840
But then I kind of started looking at pink in Byzantine iconography and reading about

241
00:16:14,840 --> 00:16:15,840
that while I was in Tinos.

242
00:16:15,840 --> 00:16:22,000
And there wasn't much written about the significance of the pink found in Saints' Roads, for instance.

243
00:16:22,000 --> 00:16:25,880
There was a lot written about the blue and the red, but not much written about the pink.

244
00:16:25,880 --> 00:16:29,640
And pink does play a massive role in Byzantine iconography, but there's not much written

245
00:16:29,640 --> 00:16:31,760
about the symbolism of that.

246
00:16:31,760 --> 00:16:37,160
So in a way, I do use pink to think about a variety of disparate notions.

247
00:16:37,160 --> 00:16:42,560
But something I had read recently about pink dolphins, as you mentioned, was the fact that

248
00:16:42,560 --> 00:16:44,080
they're not in themselves pink.

249
00:16:44,080 --> 00:16:47,800
It's the blood showing through their gray skin, which gives them the appearance of being

250
00:16:47,800 --> 00:16:48,760
pink.

251
00:16:48,760 --> 00:16:52,200
So then I started thinking about pink again as a force of life.

252
00:16:52,200 --> 00:16:57,640
And that linked to what I had said initially about starting to think about pink and decay,

253
00:16:57,640 --> 00:17:02,440
because they seem like they'd be quite disparate, because pink is also a color that seems sometimes

254
00:17:02,440 --> 00:17:04,200
frivolous or artificial.

255
00:17:04,200 --> 00:17:10,240
But yeah, through these dolphins, and this is why I began to use them as a repeated motif

256
00:17:10,240 --> 00:17:15,960
in my work, is that pink can allude to notions of wisdom, for instance.

257
00:17:15,960 --> 00:17:20,200
The older we get, the wiser we get, and in a way, these animals become, their pink becomes

258
00:17:20,200 --> 00:17:24,840
more intensified as they get older, showing their wisdom.

259
00:17:24,840 --> 00:17:30,000
So I'm kind of interested in pink having the capacity to talk about a variety of different

260
00:17:30,000 --> 00:17:33,720
notions that we wouldn't initially associate.

261
00:17:33,720 --> 00:17:39,360
And so usually, it's a color that I use in the first kind of abstract gesture that I

262
00:17:39,360 --> 00:17:40,360
make on the surface.

263
00:17:40,360 --> 00:17:44,120
And that is something that I find quite comforting.

264
00:17:44,120 --> 00:17:49,080
But then other colors start to emerge through, it could be through a body of water, the body

265
00:17:49,080 --> 00:17:51,040
of water that the dolphin is in.

266
00:17:51,040 --> 00:17:54,280
It could emerge through the color of the found object.

267
00:17:54,280 --> 00:17:59,040
So all the layers of colors reference the different narratives of the objects.

268
00:17:59,040 --> 00:18:02,080
It references different phases of life.

269
00:18:02,080 --> 00:18:04,480
But you keep coming back to this color.

270
00:18:04,480 --> 00:18:08,880
I do keep coming back to this color, but there are times where through graphite, for instance,

271
00:18:08,880 --> 00:18:13,080
if I'm using pink and graphite, the pink becomes more purple.

272
00:18:13,080 --> 00:18:17,320
So I'm interested in the kind of organic decay of the color on the surface.

273
00:18:17,320 --> 00:18:21,200
And if the pink is going to become purple, or if it's going to become more red, I allow

274
00:18:21,200 --> 00:18:22,280
for that to happen.

275
00:18:22,280 --> 00:18:24,600
I don't force pink into my work.

276
00:18:24,600 --> 00:18:29,320
But yeah, like I said, initially, when I'm painting the subject, whether that be a pair

277
00:18:29,320 --> 00:18:35,240
of throwaway shoes, or a pair of pink dolphins that I think are in love, the pink has the

278
00:18:35,240 --> 00:18:38,040
same value, no matter what it's depicting.

279
00:18:38,040 --> 00:18:41,400
All the objects are treated in the same way.

280
00:18:41,400 --> 00:18:45,160
And I'm interested in there not being a hierarchy between the fragments in the painting.

281
00:18:45,160 --> 00:18:47,600
They're all just part of a language of stuff.

282
00:18:47,600 --> 00:18:52,960
Tell me, what would you like your work to be saying to people?

283
00:18:52,960 --> 00:18:56,920
How would you like people to walk away after seeing your work?

284
00:18:56,920 --> 00:19:03,800
I think what's important for me is the viewer starting to notice things, notice things around

285
00:19:03,800 --> 00:19:05,720
them in everyday life.

286
00:19:05,720 --> 00:19:11,160
Start thinking about things that are on their way out, things that are, you know, being

287
00:19:11,160 --> 00:19:15,640
ready to throw away, whether that be a piece of furniture or something that the audience

288
00:19:15,640 --> 00:19:20,680
are very quickly to turn into rubbish, to kind of think about the process of objects,

289
00:19:20,680 --> 00:19:26,640
the life of objects, trying to give things more of an opportunity to still exist before

290
00:19:26,640 --> 00:19:28,140
discarding it.

291
00:19:28,140 --> 00:19:34,980
So for me, it would be more of a change in attitude towards things around us and appreciation

292
00:19:34,980 --> 00:19:35,980
of objects.

293
00:19:35,980 --> 00:19:43,720
So I think definitely to slow down in a way, and that would be a success if I could make

294
00:19:43,720 --> 00:19:48,240
work where the viewer would just in their everyday life slow down a little.

295
00:19:48,240 --> 00:19:54,560
And what would be your dream project to create that is something you aspire to do that you

296
00:19:54,560 --> 00:20:00,160
haven't been able to do yet because of scale, because of circumstances, etc.?

297
00:20:00,160 --> 00:20:01,160
Yeah.

298
00:20:01,160 --> 00:20:06,800
I'm aiming for the idea of whatever I make on a small scale now, for that to be able

299
00:20:06,800 --> 00:20:08,560
to transcend surfaces.

300
00:20:08,560 --> 00:20:12,720
So what you can see now on the floor with the yoga mats, for instance, this was kind

301
00:20:12,720 --> 00:20:20,160
of an organic spill of my works onto the surface I've been sitting on to unpick all the found

302
00:20:20,160 --> 00:20:21,160
objects.

303
00:20:21,160 --> 00:20:27,880
So for me, the goal is kind of to let any object have the capacity to become something

304
00:20:27,880 --> 00:20:29,160
else.

305
00:20:29,160 --> 00:20:35,520
So the work that I'm proceeding to make for the next few months will be accumulating yoga

306
00:20:35,520 --> 00:20:42,440
mats, discarded yoga mats from women all over Athens to make a giant collage of these embroidered

307
00:20:42,440 --> 00:20:48,440
motifs cut out in each yoga mat, but they're all going to become part of one whole.

308
00:20:48,440 --> 00:20:52,760
So in a way, I'm starting to think about how the viewer will experience my work because

309
00:20:52,760 --> 00:20:56,160
I'm interested in everything making sense as you're looking.

310
00:20:56,160 --> 00:21:00,180
So instead of just stretching the canvases or framing them, there's going to be a more

311
00:21:00,180 --> 00:21:04,680
elaborate way of stepping onto all these yoga mats and thinking about the histories of these

312
00:21:04,680 --> 00:21:09,480
individual objects and how they've become part of one whole and what it means to look

313
00:21:09,480 --> 00:21:15,920
at a piece of work and be stepping on something which has so much history in a way.

314
00:21:15,920 --> 00:21:21,060
So I'm kind of interested in how my work can start becoming an experience rather than just

315
00:21:21,060 --> 00:21:22,060
an object to look at.

316
00:21:22,060 --> 00:21:26,480
As you're talking here, you currently have your canvases displayed.

317
00:21:26,480 --> 00:21:33,520
There's almost a kind of a transparency where one can see through one canvas into another.

318
00:21:33,520 --> 00:21:37,880
And there's a very fluid way of interacting with your work.

319
00:21:37,880 --> 00:21:38,880
Absolutely.

320
00:21:38,880 --> 00:21:43,480
And thinking about exhibiting my work, there needs to be a reflection of the studio as

321
00:21:43,480 --> 00:21:47,720
well because the way in which some works are hung, some works are starting to emerge on

322
00:21:47,720 --> 00:21:52,720
the floor, I think there needs to be an honest reflection of that when thinking about how

323
00:21:52,720 --> 00:21:54,160
to exhibit them.

324
00:21:54,160 --> 00:21:57,600
And it's more about creating like a world for the viewer of these things rather than

325
00:21:57,600 --> 00:22:00,520
just showing glimpses through surfaces.

326
00:22:00,520 --> 00:22:01,520
Right.

327
00:22:01,520 --> 00:22:05,800
And that world you've referred, you've talked about Elefcina, about Dinos.

328
00:22:05,800 --> 00:22:10,880
How do you think nature fits into your work or how your work could be in nature?

329
00:22:10,880 --> 00:22:16,360
Well, just by the way in which the process is so organic and unpredictable, that's an

330
00:22:16,360 --> 00:22:19,800
instant reference to nature in a way.

331
00:22:19,800 --> 00:22:24,760
And the geometry in a lot of my work can link to fractals, for instance, and the repetition

332
00:22:24,760 --> 00:22:25,760
of fractals.

333
00:22:25,760 --> 00:22:31,440
So the way in which my work can be kind of rolled up and taken to a place is also a kind

334
00:22:31,440 --> 00:22:36,760
of reflection of the nature of my work because I can roll it up and take it to a quarry,

335
00:22:36,760 --> 00:22:42,680
for instance, or take it to a forest and get some inspiration as to how the colors will

336
00:22:42,680 --> 00:22:44,240
unfold on the surface.

337
00:22:44,240 --> 00:22:49,240
So there's a very direct link with nature as I'm making the work as well.

338
00:22:49,240 --> 00:22:51,640
And when I'm stuck, this is often something I do is take the...

339
00:22:51,640 --> 00:22:52,640
So like it's a conversation.

340
00:22:52,640 --> 00:22:54,120
You take it into the space.

341
00:22:54,120 --> 00:22:55,120
Yeah.

342
00:22:55,120 --> 00:22:59,480
I'll take it to a space that I'll find quite mesmerizing, like a green quarry in Dinos,

343
00:22:59,480 --> 00:23:00,480
for instance.

344
00:23:00,480 --> 00:23:05,080
That has helped the last body of work evolve massively just in the way in which like the

345
00:23:05,080 --> 00:23:09,120
artificial lake reflects the lines in the marble.

346
00:23:09,120 --> 00:23:14,000
That's something that stuck with me for a long time and became a recurring element in

347
00:23:14,000 --> 00:23:15,920
the surface of my work.

348
00:23:15,920 --> 00:23:20,800
But also, for instance, a lot of the horizontal lines have to do with the rapid growth of

349
00:23:20,800 --> 00:23:29,160
bamboo, for instance, and the way in which these bamboo shoots evolve as they're growing.

350
00:23:29,160 --> 00:23:35,000
So there's a constant transformative element, transformative potential in my work, and that

351
00:23:35,000 --> 00:23:39,120
does come directly from nature.

352
00:23:39,120 --> 00:23:40,440
But why bamboo?

353
00:23:40,440 --> 00:23:47,760
My dad actually, who lives in China, has been bringing bamboo to grow in his garden, and

354
00:23:47,760 --> 00:23:52,600
that is one of his avid passions, and it's something that we often talk about.

355
00:23:52,600 --> 00:23:58,240
So bamboo is actually something that I enjoy discussing with my father, and it's sometimes

356
00:23:58,240 --> 00:24:05,320
the colors of bamboo and the way in which they grow kind of indirectly impacts the surface.

357
00:24:05,320 --> 00:24:06,640
They grow easily in Greece?

358
00:24:06,640 --> 00:24:10,960
No, there aren't that many types of bamboo in contrast to how many there are in China.

359
00:24:10,960 --> 00:24:16,200
There are many more different types, and one that he brought recently was like the belly

360
00:24:16,200 --> 00:24:20,880
Buddha bamboo, which starts having curves as it grows.

361
00:24:20,880 --> 00:24:24,080
So I was kind of interested in thinking about the notion of growth and how the line becomes

362
00:24:24,080 --> 00:24:29,320
a curve, and this happens in my work all the time, that this transformative potential between

363
00:24:29,320 --> 00:24:35,320
the vertical or horizontal line becoming a wave or referencing a found object.

364
00:24:35,320 --> 00:24:40,280
All this kind of goes back to drawing as well, which is like the underlying foundation of

365
00:24:40,280 --> 00:24:41,280
my work.

366
00:24:41,280 --> 00:24:46,240
Lydia, one of the things that I think they're coming back to is you're working on unstretched

367
00:24:46,240 --> 00:24:52,240
canvas, that suppleness that seems to be so key to you interacting with the work in a

368
00:24:52,240 --> 00:24:59,120
way that when you describe a stretched canvas that it somehow hinders you, hinders a certain

369
00:24:59,120 --> 00:25:05,640
process, and there's a physicality there that is somehow uncomfortable.

370
00:25:05,640 --> 00:25:07,400
Yeah, certainly.

371
00:25:07,400 --> 00:25:12,280
I find working on stretched canvas hindering and actually there's something too official

372
00:25:12,280 --> 00:25:16,360
about it which wouldn't let the work unfold in its own way.

373
00:25:16,360 --> 00:25:23,240
So working on unprimed and unstretched canvas allows for the idea that the painting could

374
00:25:23,240 --> 00:25:28,320
go on infinitely, which I think is a lot more powerful than having edges which the viewer

375
00:25:28,320 --> 00:25:31,720
is confined by when viewing the work.

376
00:25:31,720 --> 00:25:37,560
So as I had mentioned also previously to Tamara, the notion that the lines from one painting

377
00:25:37,560 --> 00:25:42,520
could organically ascend to the next painting is extremely important because I need there

378
00:25:42,520 --> 00:25:49,340
to be a flow of elements from one work to the next because that maintains a kind of

379
00:25:49,340 --> 00:25:52,480
honesty in the work.

380
00:25:52,480 --> 00:25:55,960
But you don't think that can happen with stretched canvas?

381
00:25:55,960 --> 00:26:01,200
I think it can happen for other artists on stretched canvas but for me there's something

382
00:26:01,200 --> 00:26:07,840
about the fluidity of textile which allows for more literal transitioning from one work

383
00:26:07,840 --> 00:26:09,120
to another.

384
00:26:09,120 --> 00:26:14,720
The way that the threads fall from the unstretched canvas does something in my mind that allows

385
00:26:14,720 --> 00:26:20,800
me to go onto the next piece of fabric and that means my relationship to the work is

386
00:26:20,800 --> 00:26:22,800
somehow kind of softer.

387
00:26:22,800 --> 00:26:26,920
There's a fragility about it which makes sense with all the things I collect as well.

388
00:26:26,920 --> 00:26:31,080
So working on primed canvas makes sense for the notions that I'm talking about.

389
00:26:31,080 --> 00:26:36,080
But it seems to be almost like a physical, there's a physical element to it that is just

390
00:26:36,080 --> 00:26:38,080
much more comfortable for you.

391
00:26:38,080 --> 00:26:42,280
Certainly and I feel that that would be the same for the viewer as well because I think

392
00:26:42,280 --> 00:26:48,200
people are often feel a threat or like an intimidation from paintings that are officialised

393
00:26:48,200 --> 00:26:50,360
in this way of stretching them.

394
00:26:50,360 --> 00:26:56,680
Actually I think they're more easy to access for the viewer as unstretched fragments, as

395
00:26:56,680 --> 00:27:03,000
moments in a way because there's a fluidity in the unstretched that I think passes something

396
00:27:03,000 --> 00:27:05,400
different onto the viewer.

397
00:27:05,400 --> 00:27:13,160
One last question is I love the title of your work, The Banana Falls Very Far From the Tree.

398
00:27:13,160 --> 00:27:18,960
Right, again, so that's really important that you mention that because I started thinking

399
00:27:18,960 --> 00:27:26,080
about how far the consumer is from the origin of the consumer object.

400
00:27:26,080 --> 00:27:31,080
So in a way that the title was kind of like a play on words from the apple doesn't fall

401
00:27:31,080 --> 00:27:32,080
far from the tree.

402
00:27:32,080 --> 00:27:36,960
But in a way I wanted that title to reflect how far we are from many of the things that

403
00:27:36,960 --> 00:27:39,080
we consume in our everyday lives.

404
00:27:39,080 --> 00:27:42,900
But then also what is interesting is that this is the work that we're also exploring

405
00:27:42,900 --> 00:27:45,900
as a variation and in terms of blog printing.

406
00:27:45,900 --> 00:27:50,360
What are your thoughts and feelings about that and why did you choose that work particularly?

407
00:27:50,360 --> 00:27:54,400
Well it was the first painting that truly behaved as a textile.

408
00:27:54,400 --> 00:27:59,320
So in the way that I showed you that the painting started off on a small piece of canvas but

409
00:27:59,320 --> 00:28:05,080
needed to then grow and because it was on this isolated fragment I needed to add more

410
00:28:05,080 --> 00:28:10,200
canvas to the side and sew them in order for it to be one stable whole.

411
00:28:10,200 --> 00:28:15,840
For me it made sense that an object that I treated as a textile for that to then carry

412
00:28:15,840 --> 00:28:20,520
on as textile in the way that we worked on it in the workshop.

413
00:28:20,520 --> 00:28:26,200
So I think it made sense the painting that was treated most as a fabric for its evolution

414
00:28:26,200 --> 00:28:28,280
to become something else.

415
00:28:28,280 --> 00:28:33,240
And the fact that someone else is creating that work with your collaboration, how does

416
00:28:33,240 --> 00:28:34,240
that make you feel?

417
00:28:34,240 --> 00:28:39,040
Well you know it felt like an honour because the thought process behind making the work

418
00:28:39,040 --> 00:28:44,800
was quite complicated and unusual that I was quite interested to see how someone else would

419
00:28:44,800 --> 00:28:50,440
interpret the marks or even what the hell the painting could be about you know.

420
00:28:50,440 --> 00:28:55,640
So there was a lot of layers that I was unsure about how they were going to be grasped but

421
00:28:55,640 --> 00:29:00,440
I felt so touched in a way by how people that I've never met before would interpret the

422
00:29:00,440 --> 00:29:05,400
painting and try to mimic elements of the painting.

423
00:29:05,400 --> 00:29:09,800
Yeah and I think they've done a very sincere, it's been a very painstaking job.

424
00:29:09,800 --> 00:29:11,400
Very much looking forward to seeing that.

425
00:29:11,400 --> 00:29:13,600
Yeah me too, me too.

426
00:29:13,600 --> 00:29:15,000
Thank you very much Lydia.

427
00:29:15,000 --> 00:29:37,640
Thank you Tamara.

