See you later!
Oh
Now it's all out
I hate to tell you that I told you
Now everything is out there is a reality and you know why I start with this
song of the most classic and most emblematic hypes because because I hate
otherwise I am pleased to tell you I told you I told you I told you I told you I told you I told you I told you I repeated it I said it again I do not know if you but many attacked me and now everything is out there is a reality and you know why I start with this
I told you, I told you again.
I don't know if you, but many attacked me
and now everything is out there.
It's a reality.
And you know it.
Why?
I'm talking about this.
June, June.
Of election rags.
And those election rags are usually
blows to reality.
For many, the raw is the celebration
because they are very happy
with what happened.
For others, it's the raw reality.
That blow, that opening of the eyes
and that hangover of disappointment.
And for me personally,
it's this raw,
that on the one hand I enjoy it a lot.
Why? Because while they are election processes,
of course, I get a lot of work.
I don't complain, I celebrate it a lot.
I do my August when they are election years.
But yes, I am very tired of opinion.
I think every day, I analyze every day
and not only are the opinions open
that I do through my networks,
these forums, my platforms,
but they are also the opinions
for which they pay me,
fortunately,
for thinking, for making my diagnosis,
for how I see things,
for helping and assisting with that opinion
from a selection of a candidate
to an interpretation and diagnosis
of the perception of what people are saying.
And of course, we use research.
Qualitative, quantitative, digital ethnographies,
which are these social listenings,
what people are saying on networks,
digital thermometers,
and being able to diagnose what is happening.
And then, I don't want to
ruin the exact date on my face here.
How about when you say
I don't want to do it, but I'm going to do it?
I don't want to ruin exact dates.
What I do is say that since the selection
of the famous corcholatas,
when Claudia is going to be,
Adán is going to be,
Marcelo,
I thought about it almost a year ago
that it didn't matter,
I said it in a sarcastic way
and a lot of people were offended,
that it didn't matter if a dog was passing by
and they put him as a candidate,
he was going to become the most voted president
in the history of Mexico,
unless something extremely surprising,
something that was possible,
but that looked very unlikely
to change a trend
from an electoral climate to a year
where I said that he was going to become
the person who put him as president,
and in this case he was the most voted president
in the history of Mexico.
And of course, the attacks came.
Of course, in a country divided
with so many clashes,
the statements came.
And if I thought about good things
that I was doing at the public level,
the president,
after the campaign,
damn Chairo,
if I talked about a brushstroke of sensibility
that I saw in the opposition,
damn Fifi.
And if we get into the analysis,
for example, of debates,
analysis of objectives,
analysis of consciousness,
analysis of things that were good
at the image level,
I even made predictions
of what would have to happen in the debates
and what they would have to do,
and then we analyzed if they did it
because it was positive
and if they didn't do it because it was negative,
and there came the stupid statements.
And I'm not insulting.
Hey Álvaro, everyone is free to give their opinion,
yes, but let's talk today
in this podcast
about human stupidity
from the point of view of science,
of the economies,
and I'll put them in context to what I mean
with the economies,
which is finally a study of sociology
and many things that happen at a social level.
Why? Because it will give us a chance
to talk about why what happened happened.
You don't know how many people told me,
Álvaro, I'm surprised
with the result of these elections.
And I said,
what's surprising?
Is it surprising what happened?
If you see it from the analysis
that we are going to understand
of human stupidity laws,
you will be able to understand
why what happened happened.
Now, I'm not attacking
the elected president or the current government,
on the contrary, you will realize that today
I will put them inside the quadrant
of the intelligent.
We are going to talk about
many stupidities that the opposition also committed
and we are also going to talk about
the indefense,
the society, the political parties,
some voters, and we are also going to talk about the bandits,
but so you can understand
that this is not going to be a personal opinion
of Álvaro Gordova,
but a supported opinion in academicism.
Let's get nervous.
The basic laws of human stupidity,
the basic laws of human stupidity,
is a trial and study
of the Italian economist and academic
Carlo Cipolla.
Carlo Cipolla,
why do I like his way of analyzing
and it makes me very similar to what he does,
for example, Bill Maher today
with his political satire
or even what Juvenal did
in ancient Rome with his satire.
Luckily, the word satire is later
in the one of Abuelito,
tell me a story in our section.
I'll talk a little about Juvenal
because it comes totally to the point,
but I don't get lost.
Whenever there is this kind of satire,
humor in the analysis of a more academic
court, it makes me fall in love
as part of the scientific divulgation.
So, Carlo Cipolla,
analyzing why some decisions
and actions are made in human beings,
some that benefit society
and others that harm society,
but also some that benefit us
personally and others that harm us,
wrote this essay
where he put what the laws of human stupidity are
and there are some very interesting ones
that say things like there are more stupid people
at a social level than smart people
and you end up understanding it
and above all you fall many 20s
of your own stupidity
and it has served me as a text
in my decision-making
and in my way of acting.
Why? Because Carlo Cipolla
says that human beings
through our actions,
any action that we perform,
can be analyzed
based on the benefit
that others receive
and the benefit of its own.
And based on these benefits,
he makes a Cartesian shot
that I will explain to you here,
but if you are watching it on YouTube,
I will graph it here
and if you are listening to it
on audio platforms,
jump at some point
when you can, if you want,
to the video so you can understand
what we mean by this
Cartesian shot graph
where, according to the greatest benefit
that you give to others
and the personal benefit,
there is that quadrant,
let's say it would be the quadrant
from top to the right
in the Cartesian shot
of greatest benefit to others
and personal benefit,
all that quadrant
is the quadrant of the smart people.
And so we will go explaining each one
but I want to put some examples.
Imagine that you want to eat cake,
you are at a party
where there are also other people
who want to eat cake
and therefore you have to take an action
and the action is to eat the cake
or divide the cake.
I don't know why that example came to my mind
but it can be as simple as driving,
going in traffic
and so it could also be
the issue of giving your opinion
about anything.
And more, here we are going to see
opinion about the aspect of others.
All of these are actions.
We will take it in its moment to analyze
the vote, the selection of candidates,
the way to govern,
that is, even the governance.
We will put examples of that type.
At first I put myself simplistic
so that you understand.
The traffic signals
that can be from a high sign
to it can be a traffic light
even if you can turn around or not
or respect the speed.
It is an action that as a society
we do and we put it
because we have a personal benefit,
the security one,
and that there is good circulation and flow
and that therefore also brings a benefit
to the other drivers.
It means that putting a traffic signal
is an intelligent action
and then the intelligent thing
would be to respect it.
If you arrive at a sign that says stop
you have to make a full stop
that you do not pass a stop
that you respect the follow
that would be an intelligent action.
How smart would it be?
Hey, the cake is small,
we are 10 people,
we are going to divide it into 10 equal parts
and each one eats a piece of the cake.
Even if that slice is small
it is the intelligent action
because there is the personal benefit
and the benefit of others,
I say it in cliché way,
is the famous win-win.
Hey, how good that color is,
you look very handsome, you look very pretty.
That opinion, that cake,
the other person wins in his ego
and you win in his esteem and sympathy.
That means having expressed that opinion
is an intelligent action.
Perfect!
Now let's go to the quadrant
that would be below
where there is a personal benefit
but there is loss of the other person.
That is the quadrant of the bandits.
That is the literal translation I make.
An action that would be a bandit
and therefore vandalic
is an action like, for example,
I have a personal benefit
while you lose.
So I go too far,
I do not respect.
Why? Because that's how I'm going to get
microseconds before my work
but I'm taking a personal benefit
by breaking the speed limits.
What would a bandit action be?
A bandit action would be
to steal the cake and eat it all.
The others lose
while I start to make a profit.
These actions,
sometimes bandits and vandalists,
the simplest example of a bandit action
would be to steal.
Steal a thousand pesos from a person.
Your profit is very logical.
You earned a thousand pesos,
the loss of the other person
is a thousand pesos.
They are actions that are bandits.
So, within the bandit actions,
there are many,
because I was going to put the example
of the opinion of the personal aspect
but here I want to start
to see the edges
of everything that can be
within this.
Steal.
Steal?
But while you steal,
you bring a social good to someone else,
for example, the phenomenon Robin Hood,
he stole the rich to give it to the poor,
would enter this other aspect
of the quadrants of intelligence
and the bandit,
which means it is a bandit action
but intelligent.
But also to take a step
in an opportunistic way,
take advantage of the opportunity,
is to break the law.
And breaking the law
is an action that,
although it sounds ugly to say it,
is a bandit action
but intelligent
because you took a benefit
and even the person who was behind you
now won a place of privilege
that you abandoned.
I'm not saying that living outside the law
and the bandit actions
are allowed,
but back to the Robin Hood case.
So you can tell a person,
a
a crook,
to fall for you.
Imagine that a person
smells bad in the mouth
and you don't tell him,
okay?
Hey, my mouth stinks
and it would stink,
but you, for looking good,
you say no,
it doesn't smell bad to me,
that would be a bandit action,
intelligent,
the truth is that the other person is losing
because his mouth would smell bad,
but you want to hang a little star of pleasure
with that person
and it was an intelligence
and therefore the other person also won
by not feeling bad.
And since I'm saying with the case,
I don't want to get involved with so many examples,
but since I'm saying the case of
it stinks in your mouth,
so you don't confuse that an intelligent action
is always the bandit,
the positive things
or that everything has to be fine.
Imagine that a person
smells bad in the mouth,
but that person is your partner
or is a person
that you live with for a long time.
It means if it's something that affects me personally
and therefore tell you that your mouth stinks bad,
it does bring me a benefit
and I think it will also bring you a benefit
for the social coexistences
and stigmas that can put you
if your mouth stinks bad.
Therefore,
even if it hurts and is difficult,
I will give my opinion
and I will tell you that your mouth stinks bad
so that it is not just the joke
of how well you look,
if your mouth stinks bad,
there would also be a win-win.
I know you are understanding it,
so it's a bandit action.
I'm going to the quadrant that is next to it,
which is the point I want to get to,
where there is no profit.
Neither do you win
nor do the other people win
and this is the quadrant of stupidity.
If you realize it,
it is preceded by the quadrant of intelligence.
What is human stupidity in some actions?
I stay in the middle of the street
because the yellow yellow light was on,
I see that the cars in front are stopped
and therefore I accelerate,
it goes up,
but I stay in the middle of the street.
What did I win with that action?
And see how many idiots,
especially in Mexico City,
I don't know where you live,
do that every day.
And then what they do is
I screwed myself because I didn't win anything
but I screwed the others
because now I'm getting in the way
and they can't move forward
and they end up making stupid knots.
What did you win with doing that?
It was not a bandit action,
it was not an intelligent action,
it was a stupid action.
There is a cake,
we are 10 people,
bandit is
I steal it and eat it myself.
Or I suck it,
I spit it out
so that no one else can eat it.
It would be an extremely bandit action.
Bandit in the quadrant also a little stupid
because you are also going to eat your cake
with your own drooling
and with this spit,
but finally they are your own spit.
But this, I don't get lost,
that would be the stupid action.
An intelligent bandit action
would be like I cut it into 10 equal
but in reality
mine was a bigger slice
and I stay with the biggest slice.
It would be an intelligent bandit action.
What would be a stupid action?
Get angry because the cake is too small
and poop the cake.
You are not going to eat it,
nor are others going to eat it.
Therefore, you are not the person
who poops the cake.
What do I mean by pooping the cake?
Oh, you are very bad.
And what is your opinion
about the personal aspect?
Did the other person win something?
It's not like your mouth smells bad,
you can wash it and you get a benefit.
So criticizing that kind of situation
what is going to be the other person?
Did he grow miraculously in your opinion?
And what did you gain by expressing your opinion?
Did you gain something by telling a person
a criticism about his height?
His weight?
His ways of thinking?
Did you gain something?
Did you change something in the world?
Throwing orange paint at Stone Age
or tomato sauce
to a lube paint
changed the use of the fuel?
The climate change no longer exists?
Or was it a stupid action
by two activists?
No, Álvaro, it was that he had the profit
of letting people find out
and put it in the conversation.
Bullshit, stupidities.
It's not true.
There are other ways
of doing more important activism.
There are ways of being part of the solution
and not the problem in this life.
So we already clearly understand
what stupid actions are.
And now let's go to the last quadrant.
The English translation
of Carlo Cipolla
was left as helpless.
Those who cannot have help.
The translation
would be defenseless.
Incautious.
The one who stays with his hands tied
and cannot do anything about it.
And above all,
when you are incautious,
you give someone else's benefit
or you spend watching someone else's benefits
while you lose.
And then
it's the person who says
I don't eat cake,
I die of desire to eat cake,
but I sacrifice and I'm left
without a slice of cake.
That is an indefense action.
Incautious.
You give the benefit to others
and you lose the benefit.
This so you don't think that sometimes
having the situation of incautious,
helpless,
is negative.
Because the action that I just said
of I give my slice of cake
enters this quadrant
or rather in this shared area
of the intelligent indefense.
He preferred more the benefit of the other
than the personal
and a little star hangs in the front
with that sacrifice.
So there are many actions
that leave us defenseless
but they are intelligent.
It is to tell your partner
yes, you are right,
sorry, when you are not right.
You are giving him the benefit of winning
while you apparently lose the argument
but you have the personal benefit
of mental health and a good relationship
and say, come on,
we are not going to fight for this stupidity
of which restaurant we are going to go to dinner.
I give my slice of cake
and it turns out that my action
that seems to be incautious or indefense
is actually an intelligent action
because maybe later now you owe me a favor
or because I have given my slice of cake
at that moment I generate the liking of others
and say no, now Álvaro is in charge of this
because he did not eat cake
and you get a long-term benefit
and very ancient interest
all this way of thinking and seeing life.
Now let's see what happens with traffic
in Mexico City
and with some actions
that we have to do as users
and actions that governments have to do.
There is no symbol of vile insubordination
greater than the traffic jams.
See how many traffic jams you find in Mexico City
and second point the pedestrian bridges.
Travel to a country that you consider civilized
and start seeing how many traffic jams
you find on your way
or how many pedestrian bridges.
Ah, they do not exist.
Why?
Because people do the intelligent action
of stopping at a cross
with a red hexagon that says stop
but if you put it in Mexico City
nobody is going to stop you.
School area, 20 kilometers per hour
people act
intelligently in a win-win situation.
Not here.
So what does society do?
What society does
is to do an indefense and stupid action
that would give in this part of stupidity
and the indefense question
to put a stop.
The stop brings benefit to others.
Correct.
Do not go to run over the child
or that you model your speed
or so many things that may happen
or that the pedestrian may cross
because nobody respects the pedestrian
in a city like Mexico City
brings benefit to others.
But what is personal loss?
Personal loss is one.
The government has to generate
infrastructure budget
to build and maintain those stops.
Okay?
Lose budget that could distract you
in other things.
Cars
finally also screw up
with the stops.
It means that shock absorbers wear out
but your advances also stop you.
You have to go down speed,
braking in a different way
to respect traffic signs.
I could also talk about speed fines,
speed radar cameras.
That's why smart people do it
and earn money from it.
For the age.
What does the pedestrian lose?
The pedestrian loses having to go up
some stairs and cross a pedestrian bridge
and then the government
also has to invest in it.
Do you realize that if we were smart
as a society we would respect those traffic signs
and there would be a win-win?
Therefore,
stay very, very careful
about this quadrant.
And remember what actions are smart,
bandits,
stupid,
and unruly or defenseless.
And what actions like Robin Hood's
could be a bandit
but smart action.
Because in that will also be
the key to why
what happened happened
and why I told you, I told you, I told you
and I told you that in this election
we were going to see
the most voted president
in the history of Mexico.
But I promised you
that I was going to tell you
a story
and this story is a populist story.
Pay close attention.
Can you tell me a story?
Panem et Circenses
Surely you have heard
this Latin occlusion
with the translation
Pan y Circo
to the people
Pan y Circo
What is this?
Pan y Circo action
is the way in which Juvenal
in his satyrs
and that's why I told you
that we were going to talk about the satyrs
he made his opinion of what was happening
in Rome
both in the republican Rome
and then in the imperial Rome
around why these social changes
were so interesting
why they stopped being a republic
and ended up becoming
a strong empire.
And he realized that it was in the changes
of the way of governing
in which
the context of that phrase
is given as
attention to the Roman people
that they did not have
keeping them fed
and keeping them entertained
to win
through clientelism
and to win through populism
their sympathy
and therefore
take them and keep them
in power.
So let's say it's the beginning
of populism, of the clientelism
of the clientelism
and this with the goal of keeping people
content.
This action of the people
Pan y Circo
we have to go historically
in this story
to
let's go to these changes, right?
For example, let's go with Julio César
that I think Julio César was one of the most pointed out
and then to the whole dynasty
Julio Claudia
of being very populist
to the point that we knew that within the senators
there were two big blocks
the optimists, optimates
and there were also the populists
these people who were more to please
the people. Today we would talk about the socialists
or we would talk about those who are left-wing
that today they are called populists
and then we could see the optimists
that they were the right-wingers
those who respected the rules, the laws
who had control of the state, of the budgets
of the high taxes
very in protection
of the trade and private initiatives
and of the differences of castes
and social classes
would be what they would call
an ultra-right
but to put you in the context
Rome, the Republic
as a state
grew and grew a lot
and through the conquest of new lands
where they put the consuls and the proconsuls
and to give you an example, no?
Spain, the lands that today are Spain
because there they began to see some consuls
that began to create their own laws
their own senators
and the first thing they did was
lower taxes
give people wheat
and they grew so much
that they began to generate differences
between what happened in Rome
with the way of governing
and many realized that that worked
and they began to grow
one of them, Julius Caesar
Julius Caesar was part or belonged
to the block of the populists
and began to grow to such an extent
within Rome
that he ended up pulling the republican system
and ended up with the republic
and he was so loved, so popular
so much to the people, bread and circus
I would say juvenile
that he turned him into this emperor
that although he was never called as such
if later came all his dynasty of relatives
reigning for so long
first with Caesar Augustus
and ending with Caligula
in an extremely popular way
and they became the great Roman Empire
and they threw the other one that existed
understood this historical question
I'm going to read you exactly
and punctually, textually
what juvenile says in his sátira X
where he quotes the people, bread and circus
and now this was
put yourself out there of the year 100
ok, that is, let's go these
2000 years ahead
in time
and try to take it to Mexico
today
and juvenile says
for a long time
exactly since we have no one to sell the vote
this people has lost interest
by politics
the people are not interested in the issues of government
before they were granted commands
legions
anyway, power issues
now the people stop being
and only wish with Christmas
two things
bread and circus games
means
a personal benefit
if I'm not hungry
and if I keep myself distracted
or entertained
in my micro
I will be happy
and this way
think that this was already analyzing juvenile
around the year 100
it was the way to govern the Julio Claudia dynasty
but then he got out of hand
because
through populism
they grew so much in power
that their actions
stopped being smart bandits
and they became only bandits
listen again
it was very smart
what these consuls, pro-consuls
Julio César
or Augusto
to the extent that they were so dear
that the calendar could be changed
and put a month July
because it was when Julio César was born
and then César Augusto
decide that Augusto was going to call in that way
because he also wanted his own, no?
Julio and Augusto
so dear
that it didn't matter
change things to the people who were so used to
like the calendar itself
I don't know if here
in the month of
Augusto and
Schoenbaum
let's go
to reflect about
these topics
but what am I going to do?
they grew through love
people took them
because they loved them
and above all to not lose a benefit
if I change my ruler
I lose the bread
I lose the circus
I lose the benefit
I lose the clientelism
I lose the assistance
and then
that's how the dynasty grew
Julio Claudia
when does that dynasty fall?
let's go with Nerón
when Nerón becomes a tyrant
more than a demagogue
more than a popular
becomes a tyrant
when he takes all the power
his actions
begin to be considered more bandit
than intelligent
and then a great mansion is built
where there were supposedly
the main sources
and the first places
where people used to
provide water
and they are sent to build a great
cult statue of the personality
the Colossus of Nerón
and then they
ended up losing
because a new dynasty
the Flavius
say we are going to end it
and what does the Flavian dynasty do?
the Flavian dynasty
the first thing it does is
it kills the symbols
but it keeps giving the people bread and circus
in what were those gardens
the Colosseum is created
it's called Colosseum
because there was that Colossus
to which they break his face
and leave him as a triumphant statue
and they make the great Roman Colosseum
and in those aqueducts
they make big public bathrooms
finally they return to the populism
of the people
bread and circus
well, since we understand this
since we understand
the law of human stupidity
and especially the quadrants
of intelligence
of the bandit actions
since we are understanding
the points of the uncautious
and since we are talking about
the actions that are stupid
even if you haven't asked me
and even if
sometimes the opinions
that I said during these elections
were signs of attacks
today, after so many times
that I said, I told you
let's analyze
why it happened
what happened
and let's see, I just realized
that the section of
nobody asked you
is normally where I give advice
on how to use it in our favor
and then we put the news curtain
of analysis of the month
then, go
you can get it by reference
how to take this to your personal life
every time you have an action
think about which quadrant enters
and what is the benefit of itself
and the benefit of others
and so you can check your actions
from
if you are going to pass a high
or you are not going to pass it
until you are going to think
and you are going to open your mouth
if you are doing an intelligent act
stupid, bandit but intelligent
incautious but intelligent
because you are winning something
and it has helped me a lot
they don't know how many times in my life
I stop doing things
because I say don't do it
because it's stupid
you are not winning
nor is anyone winning
nothing else
sometimes with opinions
I dedicate myself to opinion
and I hope that my opinions
are intelligent in the sense
I win by opinion
what did I win?
well, from awareness engagement
in my networks
they pay me for opinion
I give lectures
I write books
where I express my opinion
every time I comment on a YouTube channel
you listen
hello, how are you?
I greet you, Alvaro Guardada
from the public image school
I win things by generating my opinion
but I always think that that opinion
also helps you in something
they don't know how many times
I have to bite my tongue
to say to see Alvaro
here you are winning
a personal benefit
to get something out of your chest
but whoever is listening to you on your networks
will not get any benefit
because that is your personal opinion
not your opinion as a consultant
in public image
therefore
stop thinking
and I put this context
because now my opinion is going
of why
what happened happened
well
we come from bandit governments
we come from governments
that have only been in the quadrant
of winning them
without bringing a benefit to others
and I am talking of course
of the 70 years of PRI
that was pronounced so much
that later this change came in 2000
with Vicente Fox
and Felipe Calderon
but you will realize that their actions
were also quite bandit
and if we later reset it
with Enrique Peña Nieto
the bandit actions went to the maximum
well it is inaugurate this plant
of the soda industry
that is the soda of President Peña Nieto
Peña Fiel
I am going to go with social programs
to me the first one I have memories
I say already in life issues
although I was born
and I have to live
finals of Echeverria and Madrid
and I have to that
I was very young
I the first social program I heard
was the solidarity
and there was the song of
solidarity we will win
I even remember
imagine if I was a child
and it was the first time
that a more popular name was put
to a social assistance program
but in reality people
did not see the benefits
of the solidarity program
if some houses were built
and then we entered this time
where they put attractive names
and I don't want to be wrong
and if I'm wrong
I'm sorry I'm appealing
100% to my memory in Cedillo
it was called this
I think it progresses
later when Fox and Calderón
was the opportunity
and see so recent
that is Enrique Peña Nieto
and it was something similar
to progress for coming
to see if they help me
google there this
I'm asking people
from here production
put social assistance program
or the secretary
of social development
of Enrique Peña Nieto
is more I'm going to take my phone
I think I'm going to do it too
fast here among all
not the community eaters
was part of it is that
you have to understand
that it is part of a
of a umbrella
it was called
to see here they are
if with Carlos Aninas
pro nasol national solidarity program
with Cedillo progress
education program
health and food
I like the word games
not progress opportunities
with Vicente Fox and Felipe Calderón
Prospera
that's why I was
confusing with the progress
and Prospera was the Enrique
Peña Nieto
they were no more than
attractive names
opportunities program
Prospera progress
solidarity
but what was behind
the secretary of social development
the small box that was
too big
personal benefit
to steal steal
and remove those
big budget games
because the big
budget games are
social development
and that's where
for example the master scam
Rosario Robles
being the secretary
of social development
CEDESOL
ends up in jail
for being one of the
main involved
in what
documentally
with serious journalism
was called
the master scam
then we come
from bandits
and from people
incautious and indefense
helpless
I with my vote
I gave you a benefit
remember that the incautious
is the one who gave the benefit to the other
with his loss
I gave you my vote
but you stuck me
I lost
and the only one who won
the others lost
but they won
political parties
the rulers
the resource deviations
towards political campaigns
only the bandits won
people in opposition
indefense citizenship
bandits rulers
until a new government arrives
and a new government
popular
to the people pan and circus
telling him that he is going to end it all
and what does it become
the Morena movement
and what does Andrés Manuel
López Obrador
in Robin Hood
becomes Robin Hood
I'm going to take the rich away
and I'm going to give the poor
I'm going to sell an airplane
that Obama doesn't have
and I'm going to give it to the people
I'm not going to live in Los Pinos
because they stole those lands
and that has to be a popular park
where I'm going to put the dependency
to return the stolen to the people
and so the power arrives
and the first thing they do in power
is change the name
to the secretary of social development
and call it the secretary of welfare
and through this name
the name of welfare
let's see the number of programs
that there may be
welfare program
all focused on the population
pension for adults
pension for people with disabilities
scholarship for welfare
Benito Juárez
welfare sowing life
welfare young people building the future
so many for the welfare
production for the welfare
for farmers
a number of supports
but that people see them
through the welfare cards
through the welfare banks
and through an assistance
that people say
I'm receiving now the month
welfare for the older adult
between the card for this and for the other
while the scholarship
there were families that came out of extreme poverty
families that had no income
to have family income of 20 thousand pesos
and then
I give you food
and I give you a benefit
that many criticize in the short term
but it is a benefit
that if you vote for someone else
you lose it
because the bandits come back
hey alvaro but they have also stolen
more than power in this sex
that is ending
yes sega el mex
ok they are also all
are these documented audios
of construction of the mayan train
where we are going to put another material
and that shamelessly
you hear the bandit action
stupid bandit
to say
when it is already out of line
and we see what we do
the network of corruption
what the hell is that of us
every three thousand cubic meters
goes to your little spot
so that you can give me the dove
that everything is fine
when the train is already out of line
it's already worth another foot
but while
realize that it is the first time
for many of us
that we are
in this phase
of the earth as Mexicans
that is to say the first time in our lives
that we are seeing
government
intelligent bandits
let's hope someday
to see
government
that are nothing more intelligent
that see the personal benefit
and the benefit of others
in a win-win
and not in the loss of others
since I mean that this government
there have been losses for others
and we see the health sector
as it is
if you need medicine
you need medical attention
you have a child who needs
medicines against cancer
the management of the pandemic itself
as it was with the vaccines
we lost more not to be able
of course we have lost
in security issues
not to mention
that is, all the decisions
of the national guard
all the decisions
that have been taken in security issues
of course they have been
decisions
some stupid
close the airport
what did the president win?
what did we win as a society?
it was a stupid action
because the profit was ego
of the president
the losses were
multimillionaires
we lost as a society
they lost many people
and the president also lost
with that action
he could have won a lot
he could even have turned it
into a mine
of intelligent bandits
if he wanted to
this is so that they do not see
that I am giving flowers
neither
to what happened in this sex
I am talking about public image
I am talking about perception
and people perceive Robin Hood
yes, they steal but they spill
yes, the others also stole
but they did not give me a penny
yes, there are no medicines
but I have money
I have a scholarship
at the level of education
that is why
Andrés Manuel López Obrador
comes out with an evaluation
of 70%
of approval
same, which has not decreased
it has always been between the
it started with 84
it went down at some point to 68
70s low
but if we want to round it
becomes the president
with better numbers of acceptance
and above all
maintained during his sex
at the level of evaluation
as well as Enrique Peña Nieto
comes out as the president
worst evaluated in the history of Mexico
since studies are made
from Adolfo López Mateos
Andrés Manuel López Obrador
will be evaluated
as one of the best presidents
in the history of Mexico
for whom?
for the surveys that say
that they lie so much
and it turns out that they do not lie
because many surveys
gave a 30% victory to Claudia Sheinbaum
and they said they were crazy
my trust surveys
they said 20%
I always said in these forums
Claudia will win
between 15 and 20%
I was surprised that it has gone
to 30
hey, it's a state election
and they got their hands in
now I'm going to get in
with that second point
of why it happened
what happened
but then we are already understanding
this point, right?
that if you have 70% approval
in this government
that we already call it
of intelligent bandit
it means that the 70%
approximately of the people
who were going to vote
many of them were convinced
in continuity
that's why they put who they put
the election or the election
of candidates and candidates
was a referendum election
to a government
or punishment
to a government
the vote was the punishment vote
and then
I what I said
after having managed more than
33 political campaigns
in this country
I have always said that
campaigns are won by air
advertising, promotion, debates
but the elections are won by land
territorial movement
it's not the same
when you are not in the government
and you do not control the institutions
and the powers
budgets
that were managed six years ago
and still
Andrés Manuel López Obrador won
that now that you have the federal government
in your hands
it is logical that the electoral machinery
the shopping cart
buy votes
call him as you want to call him
I was also going to be present
that's why the natural vote
Claudio would have won by 20%
but with the vote pushed
the go out to vote
hey, even intimidation
in some places
yes, that happens
and that happens
that's why it went to 30%
ok?
but it went to 30%
but it would not have gone
if we had not had
an opposition
stupid
and an opposition
that enters the quadrant
of stupid bandits
gentlemen, there was never
an opposition
it's a myth that there was an opposition
and an opposition alliance
a myth
time came to them
what was there?
three worn out political franchises
with very bad public image
disorganized
I do not mean to say cephalos
because there was a head
but bandit heads
heads looking for personal interests
and party members
and not for social benefit
the selection of candidates
was stupid
many people tell me
Álvaro, how is it possible
that Rocío Nale
with so many scandals
has won for the government
of Veracruz
well, the simple answer
the first
they did not vote for Nale
they voted for Andrés Manuel
and second the machinery
that is behind
ok?
and second
because they put Junez in front of him
they put a worn out last name
and with this bad reputation
therefore
what did the party win
in putting candidates like that
but many others
I mean
we were seeing names
for the Senate
of the most archaic
and bandit that can be
and at least Morena
hides it
or hides it
what am I going with this?
you can have Bartlett
no?
of the most bandit
of the bandit that can be
in terms of what we are talking about
of chipola
yes, but
how do they do propaganda
so that that does not generate noise
but I do not get lost
I keep talking about the opposition
Xochitl
indefense
trying to give benefit to others
but without being able to take the benefit to others
Xochitl had to give taste
to Marco
to Lito
they grabbed his hands
they did not train him
they did not give him a budget
they told him the budget of the PAM party
he already left
and he is committed with these spectacular
the PRI is with this
and what do you think?
that not spectacular
I'm going to go out
said Lito
said Marco
next to you
I'm going to take a personal benefit
while we lose the election
bandit action
Xochitl
indefense
and at some points
Xochitl
had actions
that fell into the stupid
example
when he says a statement
they are talking about that if Claudia Schemann
and her heritage
and that if she has an apartment
and the other does not have
and Xochitl
makes a statement
that was one of the strongest
or the most noise generated during the campaign
said
if you have not been able to build a heritage
and buy an apartment for 60 years
because you are very stupid
if at 60 years old
you have not been able to make a heritage
you are very good
with all due respect
let's see
do you remember the quadrant?
here I put the quadrant again
where would you put
that opinion
is it an intelligent opinion?
is it a bandit opinion?
is it an untaught opinion?
or is it stupid?
you are telling him
stupid
to whom you have to convince to vote
because the one who has a heritage
to be able to have an apartment for 60 years
is going to vote for you
you do not have to convince him
Xochitl should have been
the most populist
of the popular
the most assistent
say that
from the first day
say that the welfare programs
not only would continue
but they would increase
you are receiving so much money
with your scholarship
I'm going to raise a 20%
to your scholarship
and now I'm also going to give him scholarships
or programs
to this, to this, to this
and to the other
and he should have positioned himself
in convincing
that one who did not want to lose
that benefit
he should have said the word
welfare and the secretary of welfare
will continue
in fact, I'm going to give the secretary of welfare
to the people who already have it
yes, but they did not let her do any of that
and it looked utopian
why?
because Xochitl again returned
was in the quadrant
of indifference
indifference
and now
let's finally go
to the population
that voted
and those who voted
on the one hand we have then
some govenors
bandits and smarts
with a bandit
stupid opposition
and a candidate
indifference
but let's see that there was an electorate
indifference, smart
indifference
I'm giving someone else the benefit
I'm giving you more power to power
and you know, Molotov
what happens when you give more power to power
harder they will come to us
but people said, no, they will come to help us
they will continue to help us
then
an incautious
helpless population
that many of them also said
is that
I don't like neither one nor the other
I don't even know who to vote for
totally indifference
but I have to go out and vote for someone
who do I vote for?
and who is in favor?
well
I know they steal
but they spill
therefore I will continue with my small social benefit
assistance
and then my vote
was an indifference vote
and smart
at least I get a small benefit
although the others
I don't like either
that's why a lot of middle class
voted for Morena
that people were surprised
that there was a lot of voters
that Sochitl didn't convince him
and that he said, I think things are not so bad
and I think they can continue better
and although I am a middle class
I can also get
my welfare card
and there are many people
who enter that demographic
socioeconomic
that have their adult card
and then they say
well, finally
I see a plus here
and I see a benefit
and also
it would be stupid for me
to vote for this opposition
so that's why a lot of people
who were not
morenista
of sepa
who was not happy with
Andrés Manuel López Obrador
voted for Claudia
and here is where an interesting factor comes
Claudia Sheinbaum's campaign
was a very intelligent campaign
it was a campaign
that generated security
in people who were insecure
you end up seeing a debate
and there were many people
that were not a population
of Morena that said
I think this woman is more sensible
I think it's more interesting
I think she looks more powerful
I think she looks more authoritarian
and a very bad Sochitl debate
that said
I'm not going to vote for her
I know people
against Andrés Manuel López Obrador
the other day a person at the dinner
told me the best analogy
he told me Álvaro
I was two votes for Claudia Sheinbaum
but no my values
did not allow me
this person told me
therefore I voted for Sochitl
but the analogy he told me is
but when voting
I felt like when
Ariel the little mermaid
gives her voice to Ursula
he said
I even turned to see
while he was
social
and then
comes this social minority
of opposition
and I say a social minority
of opposition
the one that can have a patrimony
at the age of 60
to go around
to travel
the social business
dome
comes all this people
who are given
so many pejorative attributes
that they can say
a small, small social minority
totally defenseless
defenseless
and stupid
with eyes closed
without realizing
that there was no opposition
that what was dedicated
to the campaign
was to denounce the polls
no, the polls are very bad
I have a small survey here
of a little-reputed
house of research
that says that there is a couple
and that even Sochitl
is a point up
let's celebrate
and a population
that continues
doing stupid acts
the other day
there were on social networks
circular
of this opposing society
angry
is very crude
with the results
of this election
saying things so unpleasant
and that post said
from today
zero propinal
comes comes
to the top of the super
even if it is an adult
if they want so much
to help them
help them someone else
it seems that
I'm going to give my housemaid
benefits of law
if you want to help them so much
Claudia Sheinbaum
help them
that action is a stupid action
it's a loss
lose wherever you see it
therefore
that social minority
his vote
I thought it was a smart vote
but I had to know
that it was
a political cause
and that it was
a political cause
to see that it was
a lost cause
from the beginning
and when I said it
they attacked me
and many of the attacks
very stupid
the only smart
at the opposition level
was the rose tide
the rose tide
if I tried to win
but too late
too late
the wave of the rose tide
rose during the campaign
what is the smart thing
for that opposition
that is so angry
do that activism
they did
and take it
to make people say things
like Morena said
Andrés Manuel López Obrador
did not become
the most voted president
in the history of Mexico
Claudia Sheinbaum already passed it
overnight
but it was through
that lost campaign of 2006
that creates a social movement
that people began to say
if that's the case
if they are not governing
how will they be if they govern
and that they become a political party
that is the path of the opposition
the rose tide
no longer think of Pri and Pan
of course in PRD, CD
that friend is dead
they just haven't warned him
that friend was dead
they just hadn't warned him
of course he's already dead
but think that the second
political force of this country
today is the Green Party
ok?
and in the third citizen movement
and the work started
then comes the Pan
and then comes the PRI
you have to know when a cartridge
is already soaked
is already burned
because now I'm going to
bite my tongue
because I would love to tell you
I told you
six years later
of what is going to happen
in this sexenium
and I can today
throw my cards on the table
and tell you who is going to be
the next president of Mexico
or the three alternatives
of the next president of Mexico
but it's not time to think
because maybe for the moment
I don't win anything with that opinion
and you only satiate a curiosity
I even after this election
I don't know if I've made a decision
so sharp to the 100%
but I'm going to separate myself
more and more from the political opinion
as long as we continue to be
a stupid society
in our way of acting
as long as we continue to be
so incivilized
in our way of living
as long as we continue to have
so much incongruity and social resentment
between two opposite sides
I think that quiet
I look more beautiful
and I think that a helpless position
of incautious
will be my most intelligent position
Well, we close with the pylons as always
and go, I said I was going to bite my tongue
but what if it would be a utopian or idyllic letter
if we talk about intelligence
Claudia Schemba still has to enter
with her first 100 days of government
with actions to win, to win extremely intelligent
and especially with what is known as
Operation Scicatrice
Mexico is an open wound
and Claudia Schemba still has to do Operation Scicatrice
and she's already giving the first blows
on the table of the same
from her speech when she accepted the triumph
she's calling for conciliation
we know that right now the subject is very terrible
and what generates the most noise
is the case of judicial reform
and other issues
but Andrés Manuel is still president
from October 1 things change
and from López Portillo to Eche Berria
I don't remember being this ambassador
of an island lost in the middle of nowhere
but this little guy put Raúl Salinas in jail
and he was always the president's puppet
who is putting him in jail
and they have always given blows on the table
so the utopian Santa Claus letter
would be to make many blows of image
and propaganda that would position her
in Operation Scicatrice
and I find it very analogous
with what happened in Spain
at the end of the 80s
when the new forms of government were created
and I am mainly talking about Felipe González
Felipe González, think about the PSOE
the Spanish Socialist Workers' Party
a totally socialist party
a leftist tendency
when you finally come from a dictatorship
of the far right
and with these transition processes
and the good monarchical actions that were made
plus the good pact of the Moncloa
comes later this president
who generated a lot of fear
between some social sector
how is it possible that a socialist
someone so populist would come to power
and not only that
he came with total representation
in his mandate
in the chambers
that had not been seen in Spain
and having a president who had control of the chambers
he could unite a country
and above all he could make proposals of intelligent laws
so that people would be better
so much so that it is the longest mandate
of a president of Spain
almost 14 years being president
and he is evaluated in a way that was very good
the best that could happen to Spain
was a president of socialist court
that had majority in the congress
it was when the greatest growth and abundance came
Spain when it falls again
when a break comes
when a president comes with a divided opposition congress
that does not let his laws pass
and then comes Asnari and then all these changes come
and then comes Zapatero
and what is the serious problem of Spain today?
a social division with stupid actions
so that's why I'm talking about a utopia
what would have to happen and happen
but as utopias
we can continue talking all our lives
and they are scenarios that although we wish it possible
very unlikely
better than good
that they give us a pill
and let's see, I have a stack of pills here
because logically you should read the essay
of Carlos Chipola of the laws of human stupidity
but I do not leave it as a pill
because I practically already did the summary
of the essay and the conclusions
but hey, there it is
it is a very small essay
you read it in a very brief way
it also crossed my mind
to give you as a pill
that I mentioned Bill Maher
if you do not know who this comedian is
that I am surprised that the first thing people say about Bill Maher
is a comedian
the reality is that he is an activist
and leader of political and social opinion
very interesting
if you have never seen the real time with Bill Maher
look for it, I'm sure there in Crocs 10 HBO
they do not know what platform they pass it
it is a weekly program but of political analysis
if you have never seen it, see it
because on the one hand it shows humor, sarcasm
but opinions are very intelligent
it is very divided, they always attack it
because we know that the United States
are Democrats and Republicans
more fought and more polarized
and more stupid than ever
but as the elections of the United States come
give Bill Maher a ride
he will be the second pillar
the third while I was talking
about Rome and grandpa
tell me a story
Santiago Posteguillo
if you have never read the books of Santiago Posteguillo
you can go from
I do not know if it was trilogy
how many books were those of Africanus
who do not know how I enjoyed them
of the Punic Wars
and then you find out about the story
but in a very entertaining way
I Julia and the part of the two books
about Julia Dobna
they are also very interesting
but the trilogy that is running now
that already presented the first two books
are those of Roma Soy Yo and Maldita Roma
that are about Julius Caesar
the first is about childhood
and therefore you see how the political and social climate was
this of the optimates and the popular
but the second is already the rise
to the power of Julius Caesar
and it is very interesting
if you like the story
Santiago Posteguillo
but the pillar that I decided to finish and leave you
is in the College of Public Image
we have the certification in political image
the SIPO
that on August 10 we open all the diplomas
and certifications of the College of Public Image
if you are listening to this podcast
then twice a year we open
there are even intensive summer diplomas
but August 10 certification in political image
for what?
for what stop doing stupid things
and let's start seeing more intelligent campaigns
and take advantage of the great business behind it
that would be the most intelligent thing you could do
July, August, popular months
for the story we tell
see you and listen to us
El mes de Julio