1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:11,500
This episode is sponsored by Global Medical Response, yet another sponsor that I have tracked down because they have a solution to one of the biggest problems we have in emergency medicine and healthcare.

2
00:00:11,500 --> 00:00:18,700
We often hear the term 911 abuse, but what I love is the concept that this should be a three-tier system.

3
00:00:18,700 --> 00:00:22,700
ALS, BLS and then the non-emergent element.

4
00:00:22,700 --> 00:00:29,500
With the evolution of telehealth and telemedicine, that third tier is now possible virtually.

5
00:00:29,500 --> 00:00:35,500
In 2018, Global Medical Response pioneered 911 Nurse Navigation.

6
00:00:35,500 --> 00:00:44,000
In communities across the country, GMR's nurse navigators use evidence-based clinical protocols to screen a patient's current condition,

7
00:00:44,000 --> 00:00:49,000
providing an appropriate resource to meet the patient's unique healthcare needs,

8
00:00:49,000 --> 00:00:59,000
whether that's dispatching a rideshare to an urgent care, an appointment at a federally qualified health center, or virtual care with a physician on the spot.

9
00:00:59,000 --> 00:01:08,500
The five-level screening system ensures patients receive the right resource at the right time, in the right setting, to achieve the right outcome at the right cost.

10
00:01:08,500 --> 00:01:16,000
So as a huge advocate for our first responders' health and of course the people that we serve, this solves three issues.

11
00:01:16,000 --> 00:01:22,000
It allows the patient to have a far less expensive option when it comes to their non-emergent issue.

12
00:01:22,000 --> 00:01:30,500
It stops a firefighter or a paramedic being woken up for that call and it frees up an ER bed for a true emergency.

13
00:01:30,500 --> 00:01:37,000
So if you want to hear more about how GMR can integrate nurse navigation in your 911 system,

14
00:01:37,000 --> 00:01:48,000
listen to episode 998 with Joshua Rose and Dr. Jared Troutman or go to globalmedicalresponse.com.

15
00:01:48,000 --> 00:01:55,000
This episode is sponsored by TeamBuildr, yet another company that's doing great things for the first responder community.

16
00:01:55,000 --> 00:02:04,000
As a strength and conditioning coach myself who also trains tactical athletes, dissemination of wellness information is one of the biggest challenges.

17
00:02:04,000 --> 00:02:12,000
Now TeamBuildr is the premier strength and conditioning software for tactical athletes and there are several features that really impress me.

18
00:02:12,000 --> 00:02:20,000
Firstly, there is a full exercise library so you, the personal trainer, does not have to create that within your own department.

19
00:02:20,000 --> 00:02:25,000
Secondly, you can send out programming but also individualize, which I love.

20
00:02:25,000 --> 00:02:33,000
So you blanket program for everyone. Now you can tweak based on someone's injury, someone's need to maybe drop some body composition

21
00:02:33,000 --> 00:02:37,000
rather than having to write a program for every single person on their own.

22
00:02:37,000 --> 00:02:43,000
TeamBuildr also allows you to build custom questionnaires to collate health and wellness data.

23
00:02:43,000 --> 00:02:48,000
It integrates with wearables and I think one of the most important things is obviously it tracks.

24
00:02:48,000 --> 00:02:58,000
To me, it's imperative that we as a profession start tracking our people from day one and then over the full span of their career,

25
00:02:58,000 --> 00:03:03,000
therefore catching potential wellness issues and injuries before they happen.

26
00:03:03,000 --> 00:03:14,000
Now if you want to try TeamBuildr, they are offering you, the audience of the Behind the Shield podcast, a free 14 day trial to experience all of the features.

27
00:03:14,000 --> 00:03:24,000
And if you want to take a deeper dive into Team Builder, listen to episode 1032 with Melissa Mercado or go to teambuildr.com

28
00:03:24,000 --> 00:03:31,000
and I'll spell that to you because it's not as you think. T-E-A-M-B-U-I-L-D-R.com.

29
00:03:31,000 --> 00:03:38,000
Welcome to the Behind the Shield podcast. As always, my name is James Gearing and this week it is my absolute honor to welcome on the show

30
00:03:38,000 --> 00:03:42,000
Kiran Patil and Peter Holm Jensen.

31
00:03:42,000 --> 00:03:50,000
Now what makes this conversation so excited is PFAS is one of these buzz terms that we're hearing at the moment and rightly so.

32
00:03:50,000 --> 00:04:00,000
This is a specific forever chemical that is found in nearly all of the humans on this planet because of their toxicity and inability to break down.

33
00:04:00,000 --> 00:04:05,000
They are known to be behind numerous diseases including cancer.

34
00:04:05,000 --> 00:04:13,000
And the same PFAS is in our bunker gear, it's in our firefighting foam, as you can imagine it's what's being dropped all over California at the moment.

35
00:04:13,000 --> 00:04:24,000
So the ability to remove this from water and from the human body is an imperative conversation when it comes to a compound that will not denature on its own.

36
00:04:24,000 --> 00:04:36,000
So Peter and Kiran have developed a company called Cambiotics. They have discovered that there is a certain probiotic strain that will actually extract PFAS from the human body.

37
00:04:36,000 --> 00:04:46,000
So in this conversation we discuss a host of topics from each of their backgrounds in India and Denmark, their individual journeys through science,

38
00:04:46,000 --> 00:04:52,000
Parkinson's disease, pollution, probiotics, gut health and so much more.

39
00:04:52,000 --> 00:04:58,000
Now before we get to this incredibly exciting conversation as I say every week, please just take a moment.

40
00:04:58,000 --> 00:05:05,000
Go to whichever app you listen to this on, subscribe to the show, leave feedback and leave a rating.

41
00:05:05,000 --> 00:05:12,000
Every single five star rating truly does elevate this podcast, therefore making it easier for others to find.

42
00:05:12,000 --> 00:05:17,000
And this is a free library of over 1,000 episodes now.

43
00:05:17,000 --> 00:05:28,000
So all I ask in return is that you help share these incredible men and women stories so I can get them to every single person on planet Earth who needs to hear them.

44
00:05:28,000 --> 00:05:33,000
Now one more side note, I don't mention this on every episode but I like to periodically.

45
00:05:33,000 --> 00:05:41,000
My second book, KINDER, is not only available now on paperback and ebook but also audiobook as of the new year.

46
00:05:41,000 --> 00:05:45,000
And you can find all of those on Amazon, Audible and iTunes.

47
00:05:45,000 --> 00:05:54,000
So with that being said, I introduce to you Kiran Patil and Peter Holm Jensen. Enjoy.

48
00:05:54,000 --> 00:06:16,000
Well, Peter and Kiran, I want to start by saying two things.

49
00:06:16,000 --> 00:06:25,000
Firstly, thank you to Diane Cotter and Hitheshi for making this happen and secondly to welcome you both onto the Behind the Shield podcast today.

50
00:06:25,000 --> 00:06:27,000
Thanks a lot James.

51
00:06:27,000 --> 00:06:32,000
Yeah, pleasure to be here and very happy to speak to you, James.

52
00:06:32,000 --> 00:06:36,000
So where on planet Earth are we finding you both today?

53
00:06:36,000 --> 00:06:40,000
Well, today you are finding us in Copenhagen in Denmark.

54
00:06:40,000 --> 00:06:45,000
That's not my usual location. Usually you would find me in Cambridge, UK.

55
00:06:45,000 --> 00:06:49,000
But today I'm in Copenhagen together with Peter.

56
00:06:49,000 --> 00:06:55,000
Brilliant. All right. Well, I want to start at the very beginning of each of your journeys because obviously you guys have different backgrounds.

57
00:06:55,000 --> 00:07:04,000
So let's start with you, Peter. Tell me where you were born and tell me a little bit about your family dynamic, what your parents did, how many siblings.

58
00:07:04,000 --> 00:07:21,000
Yeah, so I'm from Denmark, originally from a small village called Hornslid in Jutland, which is the largest part of Denmark.

59
00:07:21,000 --> 00:07:32,000
I have two brothers. We lived in a small village and I one of these provincial towns where you have a fantastic childhood if you do sports.

60
00:07:32,000 --> 00:07:40,000
If you don't do sports, there's nothing to do. So I did sports my entire childhood.

61
00:07:40,000 --> 00:07:45,000
And it was a fantastic childhood I had together with my two brothers.

62
00:07:45,000 --> 00:07:56,000
And then when you become around the age of 13, 14, you start getting bored in these small villages and then you really need to go somewhere else.

63
00:07:56,000 --> 00:08:08,000
So I then went to another part of Denmark called Fyn, where I was studying for some years in university.

64
00:08:08,000 --> 00:08:17,000
And then like 25, 30 years ago, I moved to the capital of Denmark, Copenhagen, where we are today.

65
00:08:17,000 --> 00:08:23,000
When you said you were playing sports, which sports were popular back then in your village?

66
00:08:23,000 --> 00:08:29,000
Well, anything really. I think the most it was soccer.

67
00:08:29,000 --> 00:08:36,000
That's the biggest sport in Denmark. So I played that for sure.

68
00:08:36,000 --> 00:08:40,000
Handball is also a big thing, maybe not in the US, but in Denmark.

69
00:08:40,000 --> 00:08:46,000
It's a big thing, maybe because we are world champions in handball.

70
00:08:46,000 --> 00:08:55,000
But I mean, I also did swimming, volleyball, basketball, tennis, running.

71
00:08:55,000 --> 00:08:59,000
Once a week you did it all.

72
00:08:59,000 --> 00:09:06,000
When people talk about education in the world, usually Scandinavia is at the top.

73
00:09:06,000 --> 00:09:10,000
And I think I've had people like from Finland, for example, an educator from there.

74
00:09:10,000 --> 00:09:16,000
And it seems like there's a more holistic view of the child and education versus America,

75
00:09:16,000 --> 00:09:24,000
where we have this very standardized testing and we're really preparing children for tests rather than for life.

76
00:09:24,000 --> 00:09:33,000
When you look back now, what were some of the good things about your Scandinavian upbringing that maybe other countries could learn from?

77
00:09:33,000 --> 00:09:47,000
Yeah, well, my generation, me and my brothers, we are the first generation in my family that had an education on university level.

78
00:09:47,000 --> 00:09:52,000
And I think that's really due to the welfare system that we have in Scandinavia,

79
00:09:52,000 --> 00:09:56,000
where it's society paying for the education for everybody.

80
00:09:56,000 --> 00:10:04,000
So, I mean, my parents did not have to use all the spending for my education.

81
00:10:04,000 --> 00:10:16,000
So I think it's one of the things that I believe that society can learn from the Scandinavian model is really that education should really be for everybody.

82
00:10:16,000 --> 00:10:23,000
And society should pay for education for everybody, because it's also society benefiting from that.

83
00:10:23,000 --> 00:10:29,000
Everybody is able to generate knowledge and participate in the development of society.

84
00:10:29,000 --> 00:10:38,000
So that is for sure something that has been important in my upbringing and in my education.

85
00:10:38,000 --> 00:10:45,000
And, you know, if we had been living in the US, I don't know whether my parents had been able to pay for my education.

86
00:10:45,000 --> 00:10:53,000
Yeah, my wife just finished, we've had to finish medical school and she's going to have close to half a million dollars worth of debt,

87
00:10:53,000 --> 00:10:58,000
just from being a doctor, which she's then going to go and help people in America for the next few decades.

88
00:10:58,000 --> 00:11:07,000
So I truly agree. I think if you had a system where, you know, if the kid just went to university and messed around and got drunk and failed,

89
00:11:07,000 --> 00:11:09,000
then you give them the bill for that.

90
00:11:09,000 --> 00:11:17,000
But if they actually graduate and become, you know, a contributor to society, I believe that we should help our children or young people

91
00:11:17,000 --> 00:11:23,000
so that they can then be, you know, elevated to some position where they're going to make the country better.

92
00:11:23,000 --> 00:11:26,000
Yeah, for sure.

93
00:11:26,000 --> 00:11:29,000
So staying with you, Peter, one more question.

94
00:11:29,000 --> 00:11:36,000
When you reflect back, where did the interest in science come from your younger years?

95
00:11:36,000 --> 00:11:43,000
I think it came from a fantastic chemistry teacher that I had in high school that really inspired me.

96
00:11:43,000 --> 00:11:49,000
And even though I was interested in science on a high school level, I think, you know,

97
00:11:49,000 --> 00:11:56,000
having the right teachers is something that really is decisive on which route you take.

98
00:11:56,000 --> 00:12:05,000
So already in second grade of high school, I was pretty convinced that which direction I wanted to go in terms of natural sciences.

99
00:12:05,000 --> 00:12:12,000
And I was convinced that I was going to be able to do that when I should be studying next level at university.

100
00:12:12,000 --> 00:12:21,000
So I would thank my teachers for that, I would say, specifically two teachers without naming them.

101
00:12:21,000 --> 00:12:25,000
Brilliant. Well, that's another important factor that I've had from a lot of people.

102
00:12:25,000 --> 00:12:33,000
Whatever their upbringing was like, whether they had two great parents that were present or whether they only had a parent or they were living with grandparents,

103
00:12:33,000 --> 00:12:41,000
that steer them in to a good direction. So whether it's a teacher or a sports coach or a spiritual leader, whoever it is,

104
00:12:41,000 --> 00:12:47,000
we all have the ability to affect children's lives, even if they're not their own.

105
00:12:47,000 --> 00:12:51,000
Yes. No doubt about that.

106
00:12:51,000 --> 00:13:00,000
All right. Well, Kiran, on to you. So tell me where you were born and tell me a little about your family dynamic, what your parents did, how many siblings?

107
00:13:00,000 --> 00:13:06,000
Well, James, I was born in India, in the rural part of India in southwest.

108
00:13:06,000 --> 00:13:13,000
And I actually as a child, my family moved around quite a bit because my father worked in the FDA.

109
00:13:13,000 --> 00:13:22,000
And that he was a food inspector. And that job required that every five years he had to work in a new city.

110
00:13:22,000 --> 00:13:27,000
And that's how it was the nature of the job. I grew up in many different places in that region,

111
00:13:27,000 --> 00:13:32,000
which was hard in some ways because, of course, moving is always difficult.

112
00:13:32,000 --> 00:13:38,000
You change your school, your friends and everything. As you become a teenager, it becomes progressively more difficult.

113
00:13:38,000 --> 00:13:44,000
But looking back, actually, I'm quite happy that we did that because also I made new friends,

114
00:13:44,000 --> 00:13:52,000
got to new places, new schools and to some extent learned how to adapt to new places.

115
00:13:52,000 --> 00:13:58,000
And it was fun also meeting new people, new classmates and so on.

116
00:13:58,000 --> 00:14:01,000
And what about sports? What were you playing?

117
00:14:01,000 --> 00:14:09,000
Well, that's an easy one. Everyone plays cricket. So you don't have many different options.

118
00:14:09,000 --> 00:14:15,000
Nowadays, there are more options, but cricket is kind of the standard thing that you do.

119
00:14:15,000 --> 00:14:19,000
So which is what I did as well.

120
00:14:19,000 --> 00:14:26,000
With this traveling that you had as a family, India obviously is very diverse.

121
00:14:26,000 --> 00:14:32,000
And you have a lot of poverty in some of the cities and the abuse of industry in some areas.

122
00:14:32,000 --> 00:14:35,000
But then you have obviously all the rural beautiful areas too.

123
00:14:35,000 --> 00:14:41,000
The same kind of lens as I asked Peter, what were the things that India was doing really well?

124
00:14:41,000 --> 00:14:44,000
And then seeing as we're going to get into chemicals and pollution,

125
00:14:44,000 --> 00:14:49,000
what were some of the things that they weren't doing well when it came to the health of their people?

126
00:14:49,000 --> 00:14:54,000
I mean, I can only speak in hindsight because when you live in a society,

127
00:14:54,000 --> 00:14:57,000
especially when you grow up there, that's your world, right?

128
00:14:57,000 --> 00:15:01,000
That's how the world is. You kind of have nothing to contrast it against.

129
00:15:01,000 --> 00:15:07,000
And looking back, I lived in Europe for a long time now, more than 20 years.

130
00:15:07,000 --> 00:15:12,000
And there are incredible things in India. It's very populated.

131
00:15:12,000 --> 00:15:18,000
It's tense and you have big inequalities in many different regards.

132
00:15:18,000 --> 00:15:25,000
But it's actually quite amazing that it functions, which is a big thing.

133
00:15:25,000 --> 00:15:27,000
But also you have incredible people, right?

134
00:15:27,000 --> 00:15:33,000
People you can see that are living in poverty but doing absolutely amazing jobs.

135
00:15:33,000 --> 00:15:36,000
They are very dedicated to what they do.

136
00:15:36,000 --> 00:15:41,000
They make every effort and try to help others even though they are poor themselves.

137
00:15:41,000 --> 00:15:44,000
You kind of have these incredible features.

138
00:15:44,000 --> 00:15:49,000
Also with education, I must say that similar to what Peter said,

139
00:15:49,000 --> 00:15:52,000
I think free education actually is still...

140
00:15:52,000 --> 00:15:59,000
You have private universities in India, but most good places actually are public universities and public schools.

141
00:15:59,000 --> 00:16:06,000
This is where I studied and I'm very grateful for that, having that opportunity to have good education.

142
00:16:06,000 --> 00:16:11,000
It's kind of a bit of a mixture because we have good education, but it's still very competitive.

143
00:16:11,000 --> 00:16:17,000
Simply because we are a lot of people, which means that if you want to go to a good place, you have to compete.

144
00:16:17,000 --> 00:16:25,000
And this is not competition who got most money to pay for the fees, but you have to just rank high in the price.

145
00:16:25,000 --> 00:16:28,000
To some extent, there's also a lot of pressure.

146
00:16:28,000 --> 00:16:39,000
I think India could also actually learn a bit from Scandinavia that you have to kind of balance the open up more opportunities for people to do things.

147
00:16:39,000 --> 00:16:47,000
What is it about Indian culture and that environment that creates so many great people in science and medicine

148
00:16:47,000 --> 00:16:52,000
that ultimately find themselves in the UK and America and other countries?

149
00:16:52,000 --> 00:16:55,000
I mean, it's a difficult question to answer.

150
00:16:55,000 --> 00:16:58,000
Explaining human nature has never been easy.

151
00:16:58,000 --> 00:17:06,000
But I think, at least based on my experience and observations, I think part of this is resilience.

152
00:17:06,000 --> 00:17:09,000
It's a system that you have to work through.

153
00:17:09,000 --> 00:17:15,000
And a good example of that is if you look at a typical traffic situation in India, it's very crowded.

154
00:17:15,000 --> 00:17:22,000
A lot of people trying to pass through in small vehicles, bicycles, pedestrians, animals, all at the same time.

155
00:17:22,000 --> 00:17:28,000
And it's a little bit chaotic, but very rarely you will see that people are angry about it.

156
00:17:28,000 --> 00:17:35,000
If you have a similar situation in Europe, somewhere you will see people will get very agitated and trying to shout at each other or hon.

157
00:17:35,000 --> 00:17:41,000
And trying to, in India, they will just kind of wait for someone to pass and then they will just go about their way.

158
00:17:41,000 --> 00:17:49,000
It builds some degree of resilience and patience that you have to just wait out certain things and go forward.

159
00:17:49,000 --> 00:17:55,000
And I think that sometimes it can be, of course, not good to be too patient.

160
00:17:55,000 --> 00:17:59,000
But I think I personally feel that I benefit from that.

161
00:17:59,000 --> 00:18:04,000
You kind of don't get upset easily.

162
00:18:04,000 --> 00:18:06,000
Well, Peter, let's go back to you then.

163
00:18:06,000 --> 00:18:10,000
Let's walk through your journey into the science world.

164
00:18:10,000 --> 00:18:15,000
And then I'd love to hear more about working with Carlsberg.

165
00:18:15,000 --> 00:18:17,000
Yes.

166
00:18:17,000 --> 00:18:24,000
So I started my education in science at the University of Odense at Fyn.

167
00:18:24,000 --> 00:18:32,000
And then after four years, when I had to do my masters, I moved to Copenhagen, where I did my masters at the Carlsberg laboratory.

168
00:18:32,000 --> 00:18:37,000
When people hear about Carlsberg, they think it has to be about brewing.

169
00:18:37,000 --> 00:18:42,000
When you do some science at Carlsberg laboratory, actually, it doesn't.

170
00:18:42,000 --> 00:18:52,000
When you enter the Carlsberg laboratory, it says that on the wall, that everything we do has to be for the benefit of mankind.

171
00:18:52,000 --> 00:18:59,000
One thing, however, that Carlsberg says they would like to focus their science on is proteins.

172
00:18:59,000 --> 00:19:08,000
And you could say life, our bodies and all other life is built of proteins through the building block of life.

173
00:19:08,000 --> 00:19:16,000
So I studied proteins when I was doing my masters and also my PhD at Carlsberg.

174
00:19:16,000 --> 00:19:35,000
But I looked at that time on proteins sitting on the surface of nerve cells and tried to explain how nerve cells adhere to other nerve cells instead of, for instance, adhering to muscle cells or brain cells.

175
00:19:35,000 --> 00:19:46,000
And I was allowed to do that at Carlsberg because Carlsberg has an interest in proteins because there's a lot of proteins in beer.

176
00:19:46,000 --> 00:19:54,000
We say the foam and taste in a beer is made out of proteins as well.

177
00:19:54,000 --> 00:19:57,000
And that's the only link actually to Carlsberg.

178
00:19:57,000 --> 00:20:03,000
The reason why we were allowed to do that, it was a fantastic, inspiring place to do both my master and PhD.

179
00:20:03,000 --> 00:20:22,000
At that time, it was really a melting pot of, I think, 40, 50 different nationalities and maybe 200 different scientists, some of them visiting scientists being there for half a year, others that had been working there for 10, 15 years.

180
00:20:22,000 --> 00:20:27,000
And then a lot of PhDs and postdocs and master students working together.

181
00:20:27,000 --> 00:20:35,000
And it was a really unique place where some fantastic science were made.

182
00:20:35,000 --> 00:20:46,000
And evidence of that is that it was actually also at that time that the Danish Nobel Laureate, Morten Meldahl, he did his science at the Carlsberg Laboratory.

183
00:20:46,000 --> 00:21:01,000
And I think that's really due to the culture that was there at that time, that you were allowed to work in this area that are in between academic science and industrial science without any limitations.

184
00:21:01,000 --> 00:21:05,000
But it has to do with proteins, the building blocks of life.

185
00:21:05,000 --> 00:21:08,000
So that has really inspired me a lot.

186
00:21:08,000 --> 00:21:17,000
I think one of the other things that have inspired me a lot from Carlsberg is also that they allow themselves to work also in the interface between art and science.

187
00:21:17,000 --> 00:21:29,000
And I think that's also very inspiring because sometimes you can really use art to express something about science that science cannot express itself.

188
00:21:29,000 --> 00:21:41,000
So I think that's sort of two of the most valuable things that I've learned in my career from the Carlsberg Laboratory.

189
00:21:41,000 --> 00:21:48,000
When I think about nerve cells joining, I think about neurogenesis and traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury.

190
00:21:48,000 --> 00:22:03,000
Was there any kind of glimmer of hope in your research in that field as far as people who are injured in the central nervous system and the ability to regrow some of that damage?

191
00:22:03,000 --> 00:22:20,000
One thing that we actually ended up doing a small company on was it was not directly due to specific damages that you referred to, but it was in the focus on development of Alzheimer's medicine.

192
00:22:20,000 --> 00:22:35,000
So that's where we through the work of myself in my PhD and also two other PhDs, we identified some ligands that could be potential drug candidates for treating Alzheimer's disease.

193
00:22:35,000 --> 00:22:46,000
And we actually had some very nice, very nice preclinical data on these potential drug candidates.

194
00:22:46,000 --> 00:22:55,000
And we ended up failing in terms of not being able to find the right formulation, which is where many drugs, they end up failing.

195
00:22:55,000 --> 00:23:04,000
It's really getting them from a petri dish in the lab and then getting it to where it has to function in the brain without being damaged.

196
00:23:04,000 --> 00:23:19,000
So it was a very nice task to make a pill or kind of injection where you could either eat it or inject it into the bloodstream and then it could go across the blood brain barrier into the brain where it had to function.

197
00:23:19,000 --> 00:23:33,000
So I think the only way where you could actually administer it in any clinical trials were that you had to drill a hole in the head of the patient and then put it in through that, which is not really the proper way to administer a drug.

198
00:23:33,000 --> 00:23:47,000
It ended up not becoming a full development of a drug, but it had the potential to in terms of finding drug candidates that could actually partly cure Alzheimer's.

199
00:23:47,000 --> 00:23:54,000
But unfortunately, we couldn't get it to function because of the formulation of the drug candidate.

200
00:23:54,000 --> 00:24:04,000
Well, let's go to the world of PFAS then obviously we're going to talk about removal from water and even the human body. But when were you even made aware of this chemical?

201
00:24:04,000 --> 00:24:10,000
And then let's start talking about the impact that it has on the human body and the environment.

202
00:24:10,000 --> 00:24:28,000
Yeah, so the first time I really started to digging further into PFAS was around 10 years ago when I was a CEO of a Danish BiSolutions company called Aquaporin where we reused the way that nature filtrates water in a more industrial context.

203
00:24:28,000 --> 00:24:41,000
We take the protein from living cells that filtrates water in and out of living cells and incorporate that into a membrane that can, for instance, purify drinking water from PFAS contaminants.

204
00:24:41,000 --> 00:24:51,000
And here we started looking into the problem of PFAS in drinking water, both globally, but also in Denmark.

205
00:24:51,000 --> 00:25:03,000
Because every year we see an increase in the number of well drillings where PFAS has been contaminating these sources.

206
00:25:03,000 --> 00:25:15,000
Last year in 2024, around 55% of all new drillings in a country like Denmark showed PFAS contamination.

207
00:25:15,000 --> 00:25:27,000
When I started looking at it like close to 10 years ago, it was maybe 20 to 30% of new drillings in Denmark for drinking water that showed contamination with PFAS.

208
00:25:27,000 --> 00:25:41,000
So every year we see an increase in the contamination of PFAS in water resources, even in a country like Denmark, where we actually feel we have some of the world's cleanest drinking water.

209
00:25:41,000 --> 00:25:46,000
Then we started working with that as a value proposition for the Aquaporin site technology.

210
00:25:46,000 --> 00:25:56,000
And we got into contact with different collaboration groups, both universities and also industrial collaboration partners in that project.

211
00:25:56,000 --> 00:25:59,000
That's where sort of my journey with PFAS started.

212
00:25:59,000 --> 00:26:08,000
I had Rob Belart on the show who was the lawyer that really helped expose the PFAS contamination here in America.

213
00:26:08,000 --> 00:26:15,000
It was interesting obviously hearing about the states and I want to get to some of our standards as far as that in a little bit.

214
00:26:15,000 --> 00:26:22,000
But when I think of Denmark, Sweden, Norway, I think of also high standards and a lot of cleanliness.

215
00:26:22,000 --> 00:26:26,000
How was PFAS penetrating Denmark?

216
00:26:26,000 --> 00:26:31,000
Was it companies within your country or was it actually coming from other countries?

217
00:26:31,000 --> 00:26:40,000
I think it's coming from primarily industrial pollution that are created in Denmark, within Denmark.

218
00:26:40,000 --> 00:26:49,000
I think we have something like 1600 contamination sites in a small country like Denmark known today, already today.

219
00:26:49,000 --> 00:26:55,000
It could be from firefighter test sites.

220
00:26:55,000 --> 00:26:59,000
It could be from industrial production of chemicals.

221
00:26:59,000 --> 00:27:07,000
It could be from coding processes that are done in the automotive industry or a lot of other industries.

222
00:27:07,000 --> 00:27:12,000
So I think we are part of our own pollution.

223
00:27:12,000 --> 00:27:15,000
We are to blame ourselves in Denmark.

224
00:27:15,000 --> 00:27:19,000
I don't think we can blame any other country for the pollution that we find in Denmark.

225
00:27:19,000 --> 00:27:24,000
And I think that goes for most other countries.

226
00:27:24,000 --> 00:27:40,000
The European Environmental Agency just last year came out with a study where they had shown PFAS pollution in teenagers all over Europe.

227
00:27:40,000 --> 00:27:50,000
And on average, it was shown that by the nine countries that were tested in this study, Denmark was not included in that.

228
00:27:50,000 --> 00:28:01,000
On average, 14% of all teenagers in Europe, they show elevated PFAS levels in the blood above the health-based guidance values.

229
00:28:01,000 --> 00:28:12,000
In countries like, for instance, Norway and Sweden, it's more than 20% of the teenagers that today have PFAS levels above the health-based guidance values.

230
00:28:12,000 --> 00:28:23,000
You can ask yourself, how come that in a very regulated country like Sweden or Norway, Denmark for that matter, because I think we have the same levels, it is that high.

231
00:28:23,000 --> 00:28:32,000
One of the reasons could be that, for instance, in Norway and Sweden, one of the national sports, we just talked about sports before, is skiing.

232
00:28:32,000 --> 00:28:37,000
And all ski wax, more or less today, contains PFAS.

233
00:28:37,000 --> 00:28:49,000
So all teenagers are actually indirectly in contact with ski wax and other things that are contaminated with PFAS without knowing it.

234
00:28:49,000 --> 00:29:03,000
So it could be a very concrete reason to why a lot of teenagers in countries like Sweden and Norway have even higher PFAS levels in the blood than the average in Europe.

235
00:29:03,000 --> 00:29:19,000
I think it was surprising to see that this study by the European Environmental Agency showed PFAS levels that were very high in countries like Norway and Sweden.

236
00:29:19,000 --> 00:29:29,000
But for instance, in a country like Spain, it was only around 2% of the teenagers in Spain that had PFAS levels above the health-based guidance values.

237
00:29:29,000 --> 00:29:35,000
And you can ask yourself why. I don't have the answer for that.

238
00:29:35,000 --> 00:29:44,000
But I think it will be hard for us to blame anybody else but ourselves and our own governments and our own industries for the pollution.

239
00:29:44,000 --> 00:29:53,000
Well, when you think about skiing, I'm also thinking about the waterproofing and all the ski wear too, because obviously the fire bunker gear that we wear has all the waterproofing.

240
00:29:53,000 --> 00:30:00,000
So not only have you got it on the wax, I'm assuming that all the clothes they're wearing have probably got it in too.

241
00:30:00,000 --> 00:30:08,000
Yeah, for sure. I mean, also if you take it, I mean, Gore-Tex is made of PFAS. We all have Gore-Tex jackets, right?

242
00:30:08,000 --> 00:30:20,000
If you do water repellent coatings that you spray onto your skiing equipment, that for sure holds PFAS compounds in it as well.

243
00:30:20,000 --> 00:30:26,000
So, yeah, it's in many different types of ski approvals.

244
00:30:26,000 --> 00:30:32,000
I think there was a study that looked into professionals that have very high level.

245
00:30:32,000 --> 00:30:43,000
And I think amongst the groups that are at highest levels, I think were professional ski waxers, which of course are exposed to it a lot more.

246
00:30:43,000 --> 00:30:45,000
Yeah, I didn't even think about that.

247
00:30:45,000 --> 00:30:51,000
Well, Kiran, while we're on you, let's just kind of roll the clock back a little bit and then we'll walk through to your introduction of PFAS.

248
00:30:51,000 --> 00:30:57,000
But just prior to that, how did you find yourself in my home country in Cambridge?

249
00:30:57,000 --> 00:31:06,000
Well, it has been a long journey. I remember I told my mother that I was going to Denmark just for one year.

250
00:31:06,000 --> 00:31:12,000
That's how I left India, but haven't gone back, figuratively speaking.

251
00:31:12,000 --> 00:31:16,000
Of course, I go back every year or twice.

252
00:31:16,000 --> 00:31:20,000
So I studied chemical engineering in India.

253
00:31:20,000 --> 00:31:28,000
And while doing that, I got very interested in biotechnology, like fermentation processes, microbial biotechnology and so on.

254
00:31:28,000 --> 00:31:36,000
And I had actually one of my textbooks that I used in university was from Professor Jens Nielsen from Copenhagen.

255
00:31:36,000 --> 00:31:39,000
And I said, this is what I want to study.

256
00:31:39,000 --> 00:31:43,000
So I wrote to him and he said, OK, come here for one year.

257
00:31:43,000 --> 00:31:47,000
We will try out whether we match each other in our interest overlap.

258
00:31:47,000 --> 00:31:54,000
And that's how I came here for one year, got a PhD scholarship, did my PhD here with Jens Nielsen.

259
00:31:54,000 --> 00:31:59,000
Then after that, I was assistant professor in the same university for four years.

260
00:31:59,000 --> 00:32:05,000
Then I moved to EMBL, that's European Molecular Biology Laboratory in Heidelberg in Germany.

261
00:32:05,000 --> 00:32:13,000
I was there for 10 years and then we moved to Cambridge, where we are currently based.

262
00:32:13,000 --> 00:32:18,000
So prior to Cambiotics, what were some of the areas that you were studying?

263
00:32:18,000 --> 00:32:26,000
Yes, so as I mentioned, I started studying chemical engineering and then mostly microbial biotechnology, yeast fermentations.

264
00:32:26,000 --> 00:32:29,000
Especially I was interested in transcription regulation.

265
00:32:29,000 --> 00:32:34,000
So how gene regulation acts within the yeast and how it responds to different genetic and environmental perturbation.

266
00:32:34,000 --> 00:32:41,000
And also thinking about how we can use that knowledge to improve biological processes, industrial processes.

267
00:32:41,000 --> 00:32:49,000
And when I moved to Heidelberg in Germany, with some of my other colleagues, we got very interested in microbiomes.

268
00:32:49,000 --> 00:32:54,000
Partly just because of the curiosity and the complexity that it presents.

269
00:32:54,000 --> 00:32:58,000
You study yeast, one microorganism, and then it's complex.

270
00:32:58,000 --> 00:33:06,000
But if you now think about things like microbiome, where hundreds of different species living together, that gives fascinating complexity.

271
00:33:06,000 --> 00:33:09,000
And we started thinking about how one could tackle this.

272
00:33:09,000 --> 00:33:12,000
And then we got interested in microbiomes.

273
00:33:12,000 --> 00:33:19,000
We were very interested in understanding the impact of therapeutic drugs like medications, how that interacts with microbiome.

274
00:33:19,000 --> 00:33:25,000
And this got them more generalized into the interaction of chemicals with microbiomes.

275
00:33:25,000 --> 00:33:29,000
And that's what we've asked him a lot.

276
00:33:29,000 --> 00:33:39,000
My dad's a veterinary surgeon, but he actually says that he's more of a biologist because he's just fascinated on that side, even though he did a full career with horses and small animals.

277
00:33:39,000 --> 00:33:44,000
But every time I talk to that man, we always get onto the conversation of microbiome.

278
00:33:44,000 --> 00:33:48,000
He loves gut bacteria and poo more than anyone I've ever known.

279
00:33:48,000 --> 00:33:58,000
But the more I listen, the more we talk, the more we realize we talk about that gut brain connection.

280
00:33:58,000 --> 00:34:08,000
Speak to me about how impactful the health of our gut bacteria is in relation to overall health.

281
00:34:08,000 --> 00:34:14,000
Because if I think about one of the least healthy countries in the world, which is where I'm sitting now, the US,

282
00:34:14,000 --> 00:34:22,000
the one common denominator is all the processed food and the things that I would imagine are actually destroying our gut bacteria.

283
00:34:22,000 --> 00:34:25,000
And it's reflected on physical health, on mental health.

284
00:34:25,000 --> 00:34:34,000
So what have you seen as far as the health of gut bacteria in a human being and all the diseases that we're aware of?

285
00:34:34,000 --> 00:34:36,000
Yeah, I mean, it's a very interesting question.

286
00:34:36,000 --> 00:34:47,000
And of course, health is a holistic concept. So I think often in health, I think it's very important in a complex system,

287
00:34:47,000 --> 00:34:57,000
which is the human body, is that usually in most situations, gut microbiota will not be the driver of things, but it will be a contributing factor.

288
00:34:57,000 --> 00:35:04,000
So it's a part of a complex wheel. And every cog in that machine is important.

289
00:35:04,000 --> 00:35:10,000
And I think that microbiome is one of them. So with that in mind, I think that microbiota,

290
00:35:10,000 --> 00:35:17,000
just because it's a central position in our physiology, contributes to many, many health and disease states.

291
00:35:17,000 --> 00:35:26,000
So because food is kind of old saying that we are what we eat in a way, and everything that we eat needs to go through the GI tract.

292
00:35:26,000 --> 00:35:33,000
This is where our microbiota resides. So what they do to this food, how they interact or with the medication, other things that we eat.

293
00:35:33,000 --> 00:35:39,000
So it makes a very, very important and crucial contribution to the development.

294
00:35:39,000 --> 00:35:44,000
And I think one good example of that is training of the immune system.

295
00:35:44,000 --> 00:35:49,000
So our immune system needs to learn to recognize friends from the force from very, very early on.

296
00:35:49,000 --> 00:35:56,000
And our microbiota presents that opportunity, because you can't react, hyper react to every microbe that comes around,

297
00:35:56,000 --> 00:36:04,000
because otherwise we wouldn't survive at all. We'll be always in the kind of a hyper implemented state.

298
00:36:04,000 --> 00:36:11,000
So the gut microbiota provides that crucial training. And since we grow with it and we have evolved with it,

299
00:36:11,000 --> 00:36:17,000
I think a lot of our bodily functions, immune systems, gut function, and so on and so forth,

300
00:36:17,000 --> 00:36:24,000
and including our neurological system actually trained to work with the microbiota and the metabolites that they produce.

301
00:36:24,000 --> 00:36:28,000
So it actually is a very tight connection.

302
00:36:28,000 --> 00:36:32,000
How effective are probiotics overall?

303
00:36:32,000 --> 00:36:40,000
Are we being given roughly the right kinds of strains that we would need to improve our gut bacteria?

304
00:36:40,000 --> 00:36:49,000
Or is there a spectrum where some of the things that we're seeing on the shelves aren't very effective, but there are some other ones that are?

305
00:36:49,000 --> 00:36:54,000
That's a billion dollar question literally.

306
00:36:54,000 --> 00:36:59,000
And I think it really depends on the context.

307
00:36:59,000 --> 00:37:03,000
Again, it's a question of complexity and how complex systems respond.

308
00:37:03,000 --> 00:37:11,000
So if a particular complex system, some stimuli can make a big difference only if you're in the right state.

309
00:37:11,000 --> 00:37:21,000
I think regarding probiotics really comes down to what that person is, what their health status is, what their microbiome status is, and what that probiotic is.

310
00:37:21,000 --> 00:37:26,000
So I think there's a lot of personal individualized elements to it.

311
00:37:26,000 --> 00:37:29,000
So I think it's very difficult to make a general statement.

312
00:37:29,000 --> 00:37:39,000
What we know from the scientific literature is that many of the probiotics that people are trying to study, they don't end up colonizing the microbiota.

313
00:37:39,000 --> 00:37:41,000
Of course, it doesn't mean that they don't make any effect.

314
00:37:41,000 --> 00:37:49,000
They can stimulate immune responses, for example, or change the microbiota composition temporarily in a certain direction and so on.

315
00:37:49,000 --> 00:38:00,000
So there's definitely, I think, more work needed to understand what makes a probiotic colonize the gut and not colonize the gut and how that functions.

316
00:38:00,000 --> 00:38:04,000
But it really depends on the thing in a very, very individual context.

317
00:38:04,000 --> 00:38:06,000
Well, one more question for you, Kiran.

318
00:38:06,000 --> 00:38:10,000
Your introduction into PFAS, when did you first discover this?

319
00:38:10,000 --> 00:38:16,000
And then what were you seeing as far as the UK, India, some of the areas that you were looking at?

320
00:38:16,000 --> 00:38:22,000
So I first came across it around five years ago, actually, around the time when I moved to the UK.

321
00:38:22,000 --> 00:38:29,000
And that was the time I was thinking about, you know, we have studied a lot about, you know, drugs and microbiome interactions.

322
00:38:29,000 --> 00:38:38,000
But it's really that the classification between what we call medications and some of the other chemicals is to some extent arbitrary.

323
00:38:38,000 --> 00:38:44,000
Who decided what should be called, for example, a pesticide, and what should be called medication, what should be called a plant toxin?

324
00:38:44,000 --> 00:38:50,000
There are some clear distinctions, but some are arbitrary, if you see from a chemical structure perspective.

325
00:38:50,000 --> 00:38:57,000
And this is how I thought that, I think, what other things our microbiota would be exposed to beyond medication that we take.

326
00:38:57,000 --> 00:39:04,000
And, you know, we started thinking about pollutants around pesticides, other industrial chemicals and so on.

327
00:39:04,000 --> 00:39:13,000
And then we decided that together with my PhD student, Anna, that we can't pick one or two molecules because we are exposed to a lot of them.

328
00:39:13,000 --> 00:39:22,000
So we decided to be ambitious and do a large screen of, I think we did more than a thousand different pollutants,

329
00:39:22,000 --> 00:39:32,000
you know, to test them against, cut back to how they affect them. And when we were deciding what chemicals we should include, you know, the pesticides were obvious one.

330
00:39:32,000 --> 00:39:39,000
And then we started looking at what else. And this is how I came across the literature about PFAS and how big that problem is.

331
00:39:39,000 --> 00:39:47,000
And coincidentally, I think it was around the same time we were studying PFAS and other pollutants that we're exposed to.

332
00:39:47,000 --> 00:39:54,000
There was a news, local news in Cambridge that there's a village next called Shelford,

333
00:39:54,000 --> 00:39:59,000
probably one of the most expensive villages in England, possibly.

334
00:39:59,000 --> 00:40:08,000
And there was a news that the water supply for Great Shelford actually had higher PFAS levels than what was allowed, you know,

335
00:40:08,000 --> 00:40:18,000
and that made to the local news and so on. And then it made us even more interested in that, trying to understand about these compounds.

336
00:40:18,000 --> 00:40:22,000
Well, Peter, back to you. You mentioned a second ago about firefighters.

337
00:40:22,000 --> 00:40:33,000
So talk to me about what you've observed as far as firefighting foam, our turnout gear and other areas in my profession we're exposed to PFAS.

338
00:40:33,000 --> 00:40:46,000
Well, I would say when we talk to professionals working with PFAS pollution and testing people and firefighters for PFAS contaminants in their blood,

339
00:40:46,000 --> 00:40:56,000
we hear numbers that when we test firefighters that are some of the groups that are in the risk zone of having elevated PFAS levels,

340
00:40:56,000 --> 00:41:07,000
it's between 60 to 80 percent of the people they test that have elevated PFAS levels where you are in the risk zone of getting these terrible diseases

341
00:41:07,000 --> 00:41:23,000
that are associated to PFAS poisoning, like, for instance, cancer or lower immune responses, higher cholesterol levels, decreased fertility rates and so on.

342
00:41:23,000 --> 00:41:44,000
So when you compare that to the average, let's say, teenage offense in Europe, we are talking about, you know, maybe 500 percent higher numbers compared to the average person in society.

343
00:41:44,000 --> 00:41:56,000
So I think, as you mentioned before, whether you are a skier or whether you are a firefighter, you have these you have these approvals, which are water repellent.

344
00:41:56,000 --> 00:42:01,000
They contain PFAS. They're the best ones at repelling water. That's why we use them.

345
00:42:01,000 --> 00:42:27,000
So I think the challenge here is that we have we have some chemicals that are very, very effective, very durable, very cheap, actually, to produce and to put on to clothing and to do coatings on a lot of different types of equipment, even firefighter equipment, even put it in firefighter foam.

346
00:42:27,000 --> 00:42:33,000
Unfortunately, they are toxic and they are I mean, they're toxic like hell.

347
00:42:33,000 --> 00:42:44,000
It's very hard to find chemical pollutants that are as toxic as PFAS because it's so small amounts that are needed in order for it to be carcinogenic, for instance.

348
00:42:44,000 --> 00:42:51,000
So to cause cancer. Yeah.

349
00:42:51,000 --> 00:42:57,000
I'm sitting and thinking whether I'm answering your question on what type of equipment is it in.

350
00:42:57,000 --> 00:43:02,000
I'm more thinking what type of firefighter equipment is it not in.

351
00:43:02,000 --> 00:43:07,000
That's that's more the challenge.

352
00:43:07,000 --> 00:43:36,000
Yeah. Also, when I see the big fires that is going on, as we speak right now in California, when I see how I mean, the only way that we can effectively fight these big fires is also by using equipment or firefighter foam or things we throw out from planes

353
00:43:36,000 --> 00:43:40,000
that can sort of that can kill the fires.

354
00:43:40,000 --> 00:43:48,000
But again, a lot of these materials, not all, but a lot of them, they also contain PFAS because there's the most effective ones.

355
00:43:48,000 --> 00:44:03,000
So right now we actually, you know, seeing it a dilemma where we say, should we use these materials to fight the fire and thereby also polluting the environment afterwards because we know we are.

356
00:44:03,000 --> 00:44:08,000
And of course, that's a terrible dilemma to be in.

357
00:44:08,000 --> 00:44:14,000
But this is the dilemma we have with using PFAS as we do today.

358
00:44:14,000 --> 00:44:24,000
It's been interesting talking to several members of the wildland community that are thought leaders when it comes to innovation and the safety and mental health of the firefighter.

359
00:44:24,000 --> 00:44:27,000
But I never hear them say we need more chemicals.

360
00:44:27,000 --> 00:44:41,000
I hear them say, you know, we need to be allowed to do prescribed burns because a lot of towns, I don't want smoke in my town, so they'll oppose prescribed burns, you know, making ordinance where you can't have brush within a certain amount of space, you know,

361
00:44:41,000 --> 00:44:51,000
distance from your home. So you create a natural fire break. So they're all very proactive, preventative measures. And then also just to the sheer workforce.

362
00:44:51,000 --> 00:44:58,000
I think the American Fire Service on the wildland side are only operating at about 70 percent of their workforce.

363
00:44:58,000 --> 00:45:04,000
And as we see now, now they're all, you know, being asked to do incredible things in California.

364
00:45:04,000 --> 00:45:07,000
So you're lacking people, you're lacking equipment as well.

365
00:45:07,000 --> 00:45:20,000
So I think when people understand that you can't just simply fly over and drop, you know, chemicals all over the place because that's going to affect the food that's grown and, you know, the children playing after the fact.

366
00:45:20,000 --> 00:45:24,000
I hope this is another push towards being more proactive.

367
00:45:24,000 --> 00:45:29,000
And the other thing is just, you know, maybe not allowing people to build houses on the side of a mountain as well.

368
00:45:29,000 --> 00:45:40,000
I mean, it sounds harsh, but, you know, if you're putting yourself right in the middle of a place that's going to naturally is burned for millennia, then now you're endangering all the people around you as well.

369
00:45:40,000 --> 00:45:48,000
I mean, there's no doubt that the answer long term and doing it is, of course, we don't need more chemicals.

370
00:45:48,000 --> 00:45:55,000
We need to do the right things long term with all the prevention measures that you mentioned.

371
00:45:55,000 --> 00:46:01,000
The problem, of course, arises if you are in the middle of a catastrophe like we are right now.

372
00:46:01,000 --> 00:46:09,000
What you do short term in order to stop the catastrophe might be a very bad thing on the long term.

373
00:46:09,000 --> 00:46:14,000
But obviously, I mean, you have to stop the catastrophe when you're standing in it.

374
00:46:14,000 --> 00:46:24,000
Absolutely. Well, when we spoke a few weeks ago, I remember you talking to me about the longevity of some of these chemicals.

375
00:46:24,000 --> 00:46:29,000
So talk to me about that. Which ones are the ones that are staying in our body?

376
00:46:29,000 --> 00:46:36,000
And then talk to me about another group that actually is excreted naturally or breaks down on its own.

377
00:46:36,000 --> 00:46:44,000
Yeah. So I think our focus in in Cambodia is really to focus on the long chain PFAS,

378
00:46:44,000 --> 00:46:48,000
which are the one that bioaccumulates the most in human beings.

379
00:46:48,000 --> 00:46:53,000
And then the short chain PFAS, they can also be toxic and carcinogenic.

380
00:46:53,000 --> 00:46:59,000
However, they are naturally excreted by the body on its own within a week or two.

381
00:46:59,000 --> 00:47:06,000
Actually, there's quite a fantastic study that just recently came out where there was a German volunteer

382
00:47:06,000 --> 00:47:10,000
that ate a lot of PFAS, different lengths of PFAS chemicals.

383
00:47:10,000 --> 00:47:17,000
And then he tested, they tested on him how fast and slow they were excreted by the body,

384
00:47:17,000 --> 00:47:20,000
which I don't know how they found that volunteer.

385
00:47:20,000 --> 00:47:28,000
But thank you to volunteer for science. It's as we said, you can only be a German.

386
00:47:28,000 --> 00:47:33,000
I mean, fantastic sacrifice from these studies.

387
00:47:33,000 --> 00:47:41,000
We have seen that short chain PFAS, they actually excrete by themselves quite fast from the human body.

388
00:47:41,000 --> 00:47:51,000
So the biggest concern we have in terms of bioaccumulation in humans causing being the root cause to terminal diseases like cancer

389
00:47:51,000 --> 00:47:56,000
is for sure the long chain PFAS. That is also what we focus on here.

390
00:47:56,000 --> 00:48:01,000
And these type of PFAS, they have lifetimes of more than a thousand years.

391
00:48:01,000 --> 00:48:11,000
How long they are in the environment, we don't really know yet because they have only been around for around 70 years.

392
00:48:11,000 --> 00:48:17,000
The first ones were developed as part of the Manhattan Project when we developed the atomic bomb.

393
00:48:17,000 --> 00:48:25,000
And then during the last decades, we have developed hundreds or even for some decades,

394
00:48:25,000 --> 00:48:30,000
thousands of new PFAS chemicals. So they haven't been around for that long.

395
00:48:30,000 --> 00:48:40,000
But the one that I exposed and goes into our drinking water today, they might have been put into the environment 50 years ago.

396
00:48:40,000 --> 00:48:50,000
So the chemicals we put into the environment and nature today will be the chemicals that will pollute our grandchildren.

397
00:48:50,000 --> 00:48:56,000
And we don't know, but we know that they will be here for a long time.

398
00:48:56,000 --> 00:49:04,000
And I think they will be here as long as the pyramids have been there. So in a way, they are our pyramids.

399
00:49:04,000 --> 00:49:13,000
So it's not a very pleasant thought, but it is something we have to address because we have to face the fact

400
00:49:13,000 --> 00:49:20,000
that we are living in a world where we have to live together with PFAS pollution.

401
00:49:20,000 --> 00:49:28,000
We can't get PFAS out of the environment, out of all the drinking water and all the soil. That's impossible.

402
00:49:28,000 --> 00:49:41,000
We don't have the money. We don't have the energy or resources to detoxify all the soil and the drinking water that is already polluted today.

403
00:49:41,000 --> 00:49:50,000
So we have to find a way where we actually are able to live alongside PFAS chemicals that surrounds us today.

404
00:49:50,000 --> 00:50:07,000
We know that because when we look at the food chain today, already today, we find PFAS in things like even eggs or butter, strawberries, other berries in nature.

405
00:50:07,000 --> 00:50:18,000
And I mean, we eat them on a daily basis. So I mean, you're not able to be a normal consumer, even if you do ecological and organic food.

406
00:50:18,000 --> 00:50:26,000
You cannot live in society today without being exposed to PFAS. That's unfortunately just a fact.

407
00:50:26,000 --> 00:50:37,000
And how long they will be here and how much it will affect human health is a big experiment, to be honest.

408
00:50:37,000 --> 00:50:43,000
Well, I think we've seen just chemicals in general, the chemicals in our food, in our air and our water.

409
00:50:43,000 --> 00:50:51,000
And you look at the growth of cancer. I mean, my feed every day now is people dying of cancer, you know, amongst other things.

410
00:50:51,000 --> 00:51:02,000
And if some of them were exposed to actual firefighting carcinogens, but arguably a lot of them, it was probably in their food, you know, or the stress of shift work or all these other things that are contributing as well.

411
00:51:02,000 --> 00:51:11,000
But yeah, I mean, we seem to have normalized cancer. You know, we do our 5Ks and shave our heads when someone's getting chemo and all that kind of stuff.

412
00:51:11,000 --> 00:51:21,000
But it's this proactive conversation we need to have. And if we can't make the PFAS go away, as we're about to say, how can we then at least try and get it from the human body?

413
00:51:21,000 --> 00:51:35,000
Yeah. And I think one thing we can do is we can change the law on how we allow chemicals to be used in the industry and thereby also indirectly polluting the environment and nature.

414
00:51:35,000 --> 00:51:47,000
And here just a week ago, there was a very interesting article coming out from the New England Journal of Medicine where a big group of scientists, they proactively go in and say,

415
00:51:47,000 --> 00:51:52,000
we have to change the laws on how chemicals are being approved today.

416
00:51:52,000 --> 00:52:11,000
Because if we don't, then we will continue to find new chemicals that 50 years from when they have been introduced into the market, we find out that they're actually toxic and very harmful or even carcinogenic to human beings or other animals.

417
00:52:11,000 --> 00:52:21,000
So I think we have to change our mindset on how chemicals can be used and also be allowed in industry.

418
00:52:21,000 --> 00:52:32,000
That's a good point. I think it's a very good article, Peter. I think they also make a case that, of course, a dose makes a poison, right? So one can argue that, you know, small amounts, you know, what does it do and so on.

419
00:52:32,000 --> 00:52:50,000
But another fact is that at what stage of life we are exposed to also makes a big difference, or which organs get exposed to. And I think, you know, early life exposure during development, I think it can be very, very critical because small effects there can amplify and, you know, may make manifest, you know, 10 years, 20, maybe 30 years later.

420
00:52:50,000 --> 00:53:02,000
It's quite important to take into context not only what concentrations, what substances we are exposed to, but when we are exposed to, how we are exposed to, which organs are being exposed.

421
00:53:02,000 --> 00:53:24,000
That's just one comment to that. For my time in the water industry in the aquapurine, I remember that when I talk to people that has been in the water industry for decades, a lot of them, they had this saying, they said, well, pollution is not really a problem.

422
00:53:24,000 --> 00:53:34,000
The solution to pollution is dilution. That's a saying that people use in the water industry, which makes me a little bit mad sometimes, to be honest.

423
00:53:34,000 --> 00:53:46,000
But it has been the fix for the last decades for 30, 40 years. And now we've come to a stage where we can't dilute our way out of it anymore, because it's all over.

424
00:53:46,000 --> 00:53:56,000
I mean, it's in the whales. That's why people in the Faroe Islands or Greenland get it. They don't have their own industry polluting the environment.

425
00:53:56,000 --> 00:54:06,000
It's actually because it's in the food chain. And now it ends up in the whales and seals that they consume.

426
00:54:06,000 --> 00:54:17,000
But yeah, even in the ice bears, you find them. I think there was a study on penguins that they found in penguins.

427
00:54:17,000 --> 00:54:25,000
So now we've come to a stage, for instance, with PFAS, where the solution to pollution can no longer be dilution.

428
00:54:25,000 --> 00:54:40,000
That's a scary place to be. And I think that's also why we feel that there's a need for treatment where you can actively also work on detoxifying your own body.

429
00:54:40,000 --> 00:54:47,000
Because no matter how much you try to prevent PFAS pollution, you will be exposed to it.

430
00:54:47,000 --> 00:54:55,000
Well, I want to get to the probiotic. One more question before we do. Rob was obviously talking about DuPont and the cover-ups that were going on there.

431
00:54:55,000 --> 00:55:04,000
He also talked about the renaming of the chemicals, so finding a slight variation of PFAS. And now it's not PFAS anymore.

432
00:55:04,000 --> 00:55:10,000
So what has been the resistance to addressing this from the industry side?

433
00:55:10,000 --> 00:55:21,000
Well, I guess profit. When you make good money, you would like to keep that profit as long as you can.

434
00:55:21,000 --> 00:55:31,000
So I think the reason is greed. And that's the prime reason.

435
00:55:31,000 --> 00:55:42,000
Because if it was not greediness that had sort of influenced decision makers, then they would have taken other decisions when they knew it was toxic.

436
00:55:42,000 --> 00:55:46,000
We have known that for decades.

437
00:55:46,000 --> 00:55:48,000
Keir, anything to add?

438
00:55:48,000 --> 00:55:56,000
No, I think I agree with Peter. I think, of course, it is difficult to put ourselves in someone else's mind and see what thinking going on.

439
00:55:56,000 --> 00:56:06,000
I mean, just another perspective to that is that PFAS are not, I mean, at least in the amounts that people have, they are not acute toxins.

440
00:56:06,000 --> 00:56:11,000
It's not that you know, it's not that, you know, sarin or something that, you know, you come in contact with.

441
00:56:11,000 --> 00:56:20,000
It's kind of a, I think analogous thing would be smoking, right? It's not, you know, smoking one cigar is not going to do, you know, or maybe you don't see anything immediately.

442
00:56:20,000 --> 00:56:28,000
So it's kind of a slow poison thing, right? And that also makes very difficult from decision making what to do about it.

443
00:56:28,000 --> 00:56:33,000
And other thing is that they are good materials. So there's a demand for materials like that.

444
00:56:33,000 --> 00:56:38,000
You know, people want to have waterproof clothes. People want to have non-stick pants.

445
00:56:38,000 --> 00:56:43,000
You know, there are certain applications where their properties are just very good.

446
00:56:43,000 --> 00:56:50,000
And I think this is kind of that confounds the whole scenario because there is a continuous demand on this kind of properties.

447
00:56:50,000 --> 00:56:55,000
So I think it's a, it's kind of interaction of all these different things coming together.

448
00:56:55,000 --> 00:57:00,000
Absolutely. All right. Well, then let's talk about the solution that you've come up with.

449
00:57:00,000 --> 00:57:03,000
So Kiran, staying with you, we were talking about gut bacteria.

450
00:57:03,000 --> 00:57:13,000
Talk to me about the discovery that, you know, you could use certain probiotics to actually remove some PFAS from the body.

451
00:57:13,000 --> 00:57:22,000
So, yeah, as I mentioned earlier, I think we were very curious about understanding interaction between chemicals that were exposed to and the gut microbiota,

452
00:57:22,000 --> 00:57:29,000
especially chemicals that come via food or water. And we decided to do this as systematically as we practically could.

453
00:57:29,000 --> 00:57:41,000
So we looked into more than a thousand chemicals that we might be likely to be exposed to industrial chemicals, including PFAS, of course, but also pesticides and so on.

454
00:57:41,000 --> 00:57:46,000
And we did a systematic screen looking into the interaction with 20 commonly found gut bacteria.

455
00:57:46,000 --> 00:57:52,000
So this gut bacteria we chose based on their prevalence, meaning that how many people who generally have them.

456
00:57:52,000 --> 00:57:57,000
So we chose one that are highly prevalent, usually in high abundance as well.

457
00:57:57,000 --> 00:58:06,000
And also some other bacteria that are famous to some extent because they have good properties or linked to diseases or health and so on.

458
00:58:06,000 --> 00:58:11,000
And this is so in the beginning, we did not look specifically for PFAS, but just we look broadscape.

459
00:58:11,000 --> 00:58:22,000
And so Anna, when my student, she had the results and we looked with and we were, you know, the PFAS kind of stood out and we were kind of curious because

460
00:58:22,000 --> 00:58:27,000
no one had reported that bacteria can actually accumulate PFAS in such high amounts.

461
00:58:27,000 --> 00:58:37,000
And so we were very curious about it. So we decided to kind of like in science, you would do you kind of repeat those experiments in different contexts and see if you can validate those.

462
00:58:37,000 --> 00:58:46,000
And we were very, very, I must say I was very surprised, but also positively and impressed by the capacity of this bacteria to accumulate PFAS.

463
00:58:46,000 --> 00:58:52,000
And we thought, you know, could we now put it to use somehow because these are natural human bacteria.

464
00:58:52,000 --> 00:59:02,000
So it means that, you know, we could actually, in a way, repurpose them to kind of sequester PFAS out of the human body.

465
00:59:02,000 --> 00:59:08,000
And then the idea, you know, this is where the chembiotics idea was born.

466
00:59:08,000 --> 00:59:14,000
And we decided to go ahead with that. And this would help in two different ways.

467
00:59:14,000 --> 00:59:22,000
One is that, of course, the PFAS that comes with the water and food that goes to the human body, also the GI tract, this bacteria could act on them.

468
00:59:22,000 --> 00:59:30,000
PFAS also, curiously enough, actually circulate between the blood and liver and the GI tract together with enteropathy circulation.

469
00:59:30,000 --> 00:59:39,000
So that's kind of a natural body process where bile acids are secreted in the early part of GI tract, in particular to absorb the lipids and fats that's going in there.

470
00:59:39,000 --> 00:59:45,000
And they're reabsorbed again. And PFAS actually find bile acids and go through the circulation.

471
00:59:45,000 --> 00:59:51,000
So, in a way, I think this bacteria that are in our GI tract also has a chance to act on them.

472
00:59:51,000 --> 00:59:55,000
So that's the basic idea.

473
00:59:55,000 --> 01:00:01,000
So, Peter, talk to me about the kind of the coalition of the two of you and the creation of chembiotics.

474
01:00:01,000 --> 01:00:08,000
And what can we see over the next couple of years as far as the US and then the rest of the world?

475
01:00:08,000 --> 01:00:18,000
Yes. So based on the really great science that Kjern and his team did at Cambridge, we sat down and talked about that.

476
01:00:18,000 --> 01:00:29,000
Maybe we could use this as a sort of a thesis for a company where we could use biology to detoxify our bodies from the chemicals that we know accumulate in our bodies

477
01:00:29,000 --> 01:00:36,000
and are the root cause to a lot of different diseases that we see today in society.

478
01:00:36,000 --> 01:00:45,000
And you could say there's a certain logic behind that because if a chemical compound like PFAS can bioaccumulate in a human cell,

479
01:00:45,000 --> 01:00:52,000
well, maybe the same chemical can also bioaccumulate in other living cells like bacteria.

480
01:00:52,000 --> 01:01:03,000
So that's sort of the thesis behind the company saying that if a chemical can bioaccumulate in the human body and in human cells,

481
01:01:03,000 --> 01:01:10,000
well, maybe biology and other living cells like bacteria are the answer to how we can get rid of it again.

482
01:01:10,000 --> 01:01:14,000
And there's a certain logic to that because it has to cross the cell membrane.

483
01:01:14,000 --> 01:01:20,000
And it's a good thing a bacterial cell and a human cell is built of the same components.

484
01:01:20,000 --> 01:01:24,000
And in many ways, we live in synergy with each other.

485
01:01:24,000 --> 01:01:35,000
It's like Kjern talked about before, we have the microbiome and looking at our human body, we have approximately as many bacterial cells in or outside our human body

486
01:01:35,000 --> 01:01:40,000
that we have human cells, more or less one to one.

487
01:01:40,000 --> 01:01:53,000
So we are living in synergy with bacteria and almost every cell is in contact or dialogue with bacterial cells on a daily basis.

488
01:01:53,000 --> 01:02:03,000
And through the science made in Cambridge, we have then been able to identify some families that could clearly bioaccumulate PFAS

489
01:02:03,000 --> 01:02:06,000
and thereby also detoxify the body from this.

490
01:02:06,000 --> 01:02:16,000
So we sort of actually based on the science from Cambridge, we are quite far in the sense that we already know which bacterial cells to work with,

491
01:02:16,000 --> 01:02:18,000
which families to work with.

492
01:02:18,000 --> 01:02:31,000
So we just and now I said just because that's a big work, we just have to take these identified cells and then produce them in larger scale,

493
01:02:31,000 --> 01:02:39,000
formulate them into the right capsule format, which are in many ways standard in the probiotics industry today.

494
01:02:39,000 --> 01:02:43,000
And then we actually have a product which we can test out in humans.

495
01:02:43,000 --> 01:02:48,000
It's important to say until now, it has been tested in the labs in Cambridge.

496
01:02:48,000 --> 01:02:56,000
And we also have mouse studies showing that it could work as an effective probiotic for PFAS detoxification.

497
01:02:56,000 --> 01:02:59,000
But it has never been tested in humans yet.

498
01:02:59,000 --> 01:03:09,000
The reason for that is that you actually more or less have to finalize the product, both with the right bacterial cells, formulate that in the right way,

499
01:03:09,000 --> 01:03:17,000
put that into a capsule that we can digest on a daily basis and then test it over a period of three to six months.

500
01:03:17,000 --> 01:03:21,000
So essentially, we are in a position where we are finalizing the product now.

501
01:03:21,000 --> 01:03:28,000
And then by the end of the year, we expect to do to start up the first clinical trials in humans.

502
01:03:28,000 --> 01:03:35,000
And if we see the same results as we have seen in the animal studies and in the lab studies in Cambridge,

503
01:03:35,000 --> 01:03:41,000
we expect to be able to put this into the market in the US by the end of 2026.

504
01:03:41,000 --> 01:03:45,000
But it's not something that we hope will be on the market in 10 years from now.

505
01:03:45,000 --> 01:03:53,000
It's actually by the end of next year, we expect to be able to provide this to, for instance, firefighters in the US.

506
01:03:53,000 --> 01:04:01,000
And we are very interested in getting into dialogue with the right people and associations in the US

507
01:04:01,000 --> 01:04:12,000
for being our first customers, if this turns out to have the same effect in humans as it has shown in the lab in Cambridge.

508
01:04:12,000 --> 01:04:21,000
When I think about animal trials versus human trials, there's some products, procedures, obviously, that just aren't apples to apples.

509
01:04:21,000 --> 01:04:27,000
But understanding the very limited amount that I do when it comes to bacteria, I would assume,

510
01:04:27,000 --> 01:04:35,000
and please correct me if I'm wrong, that the bacteria, even though it's in a mouse, is the same, basically, bacteria that would also be in a human.

511
01:04:35,000 --> 01:04:40,000
Therefore, it's very optimistic that this is going to transfer well in the human studies.

512
01:04:40,000 --> 01:04:44,000
Yes, so from a microbiome perspective, yes, they would be the same bacteria.

513
01:04:44,000 --> 01:04:49,000
In fact, the mouse GI tract physiology is different from the human physiology.

514
01:04:49,000 --> 01:04:56,000
But I think there are researchers, for example, in Stanford have shown that you can actually humanize the mouse microbiome.

515
01:04:56,000 --> 01:05:04,000
Meaning that you can actually get rid of all the antibiotics, for example, with other procedures, get rid of the normal mouse microbiome.

516
01:05:04,000 --> 01:05:07,000
And if you give them a cocktail of human bacteria, they will colonize it well.

517
01:05:07,000 --> 01:05:13,000
And you could actually get very similar to human microbiomes in there.

518
01:05:13,000 --> 01:05:16,000
Yet there are differences. We are not mice.

519
01:05:16,000 --> 01:05:20,000
The length of the GI tract, its morphology, is different.

520
01:05:20,000 --> 01:05:24,000
The way bile acid functions, the kind of food that they eat.

521
01:05:24,000 --> 01:05:31,000
And of course, we have to do testing mice that are living in cages, and they have very defined food and so on.

522
01:05:31,000 --> 01:05:35,000
So there can be differences. But we are optimistic.

523
01:05:35,000 --> 01:05:40,000
And I think one reason behind that optimism is that we...

524
01:05:40,000 --> 01:05:44,000
So probiotics is a general term, right? So they can work in many different ways.

525
01:05:44,000 --> 01:05:50,000
Some can do immune stimulation. Some need to interact with, let's say, host immune system.

526
01:05:50,000 --> 01:05:55,000
Some needs to interact with other components of the microbiota and make something happen.

527
01:05:55,000 --> 01:06:01,000
So more steps are required to have the effect.

528
01:06:01,000 --> 01:06:06,000
More likely it is that something may not work, or it may not work in everyone.

529
01:06:06,000 --> 01:06:14,000
So in our case, our bacteria need to do one job, which is to sequester PFAS.

530
01:06:14,000 --> 01:06:19,000
And it does not necessarily require to interact with the host.

531
01:06:19,000 --> 01:06:24,000
Of course, it will interact with the host, but it's a natural human common cell bacteria.

532
01:06:24,000 --> 01:06:29,000
So I think there is a good room and scientific basis for optimism.

533
01:06:29,000 --> 01:06:36,000
But we are not mice, so we have to just try it out and go through all the process that Peter described.

534
01:06:36,000 --> 01:06:41,000
And have the regulatory approval, of course, before this part of the process as well.

535
01:06:41,000 --> 01:06:45,000
And maybe I can just add here that it's...

536
01:06:45,000 --> 01:06:52,000
What Kjern is saying is that, yes, we are optimistic on this, but the only thing that we need to do here is to test it in humans.

537
01:06:52,000 --> 01:06:56,000
And then we have the answer. Then we know whether we have a treatment or not.

538
01:06:56,000 --> 01:07:00,000
So it's just one step away from being a yes or no.

539
01:07:00,000 --> 01:07:11,000
And the good thing about our treatment here using probiotics and naturally occurring gut bacteria is that we are...

540
01:07:11,000 --> 01:07:16,000
...almost zero percent risk of it having any side effects.

541
01:07:16,000 --> 01:07:20,000
Because what we're working with here is a naturally occurring gut bacteria.

542
01:07:20,000 --> 01:07:30,000
And then we are using the natural process or we are supporting the natural process of PFAS removal that the body already does.

543
01:07:30,000 --> 01:07:37,000
Because PFAS will come out of your body if you're not exposed to more PFAS over a period of maybe, let's say, 10 years or so.

544
01:07:37,000 --> 01:07:41,000
Very slowly. What we do is we accelerate that process.

545
01:07:41,000 --> 01:07:49,000
So instead of having a small percentage, you have a big percentage of these gut bacteria that detoxify your body.

546
01:07:49,000 --> 01:07:56,000
So we essentially just support the already existing process, which is a natural process.

547
01:07:56,000 --> 01:08:03,000
And we are not like, for instance, if it was a drug, we would take an inorganic compound and put it into the body.

548
01:08:03,000 --> 01:08:13,000
We don't know what happens here. We take an existing bacteria that already exists in our gut microbiome and enhance the number of those.

549
01:08:13,000 --> 01:08:23,000
That's it. So there's almost no risk associated to what we will do.

550
01:08:23,000 --> 01:08:29,000
And then we'll see how big the effect is to the clinical trials we will start next year.

551
01:08:29,000 --> 01:08:38,000
So, yes, we are very optimistic and we are ready to go as soon as the production has been upscaled.

552
01:08:38,000 --> 01:08:44,000
I think it's a problem. I think that's worth making effort for. That's why we are doing it.

553
01:08:44,000 --> 01:08:50,000
And I think we would like to give it a best shot and think about how we are going to formulate it,

554
01:08:50,000 --> 01:08:57,000
how we are going to make sure that it's delivered to the right site in the GI tract and so on and so forth.

555
01:08:57,000 --> 01:09:02,000
Well, I'm extremely excited. I mean, as you mentioned, just the average civilian has a lot of PFAS.

556
01:09:02,000 --> 01:09:07,000
My community have so much more, as you talked about.

557
01:09:07,000 --> 01:09:12,000
What do you envision that kind of therapeutic process looking like?

558
01:09:12,000 --> 01:09:18,000
I mean, it's going to be probiotics. It's going to be excreted through the feces. It's a very natural process.

559
01:09:18,000 --> 01:09:21,000
Would a firefighter be taking it for six months?

560
01:09:21,000 --> 01:09:27,000
What are you anticipating the prescription of this would be?

561
01:09:27,000 --> 01:09:32,000
Yeah. So first of all, I think it's important to say it is not a therapeutic treatment.

562
01:09:32,000 --> 01:09:35,000
It's a dietary food supplement we're doing.

563
01:09:35,000 --> 01:09:43,000
So it's a capsule that you take on a daily basis together with your vitamin pill, something like that.

564
01:09:43,000 --> 01:09:47,000
And then we expect that you take it for a period of six to 12 months.

565
01:09:47,000 --> 01:09:52,000
And throughout that process, you will be able to detoxify your body.

566
01:09:52,000 --> 01:10:02,000
And the good thing about this is that already today, there are companies that test the levels of PFAS in individual's blood.

567
01:10:02,000 --> 01:10:06,000
So you will actually be able to monitor the PFAS levels in your blood.

568
01:10:06,000 --> 01:10:11,000
If they're elevated, you take the probiotic dietary supplement.

569
01:10:11,000 --> 01:10:18,000
And then over time, let's say every three months, you actually measure the PFAS levels in each individual.

570
01:10:18,000 --> 01:10:24,000
So we can measure efficacy in each individual throughout the treatment process.

571
01:10:24,000 --> 01:10:32,000
And that makes us quite certain on where are we, how long should you take it, and how effective is the treatment.

572
01:10:32,000 --> 01:10:37,000
So that's one of the things that makes this product a little bit unique in the market,

573
01:10:37,000 --> 01:10:45,000
because when you talk about, for instance, probiotics that are on the market today that you referred to indirectly before, James,

574
01:10:45,000 --> 01:10:48,000
some of them refer to gut health.

575
01:10:48,000 --> 01:10:53,000
And of course, gut health is important. But how do you measure gut health?

576
01:10:53,000 --> 01:11:02,000
It's a feeling. It's a gut feeling, right?

577
01:11:02,000 --> 01:11:12,000
Whereas here, we are actually able to measure the efficacy in each individual with a specific number of PFAS levels in each individual's blood.

578
01:11:12,000 --> 01:11:19,000
And therefore, we feel we have something that will for sure stand out in the market.

579
01:11:19,000 --> 01:11:29,000
And it will be a true precision probiotics that does something very specific for the people that need it. And only that.

580
01:11:29,000 --> 01:11:32,000
I think it's extremely exciting. I really do.

581
01:11:32,000 --> 01:11:38,000
And as you do the trials, obviously then we'll make sure that we connect you with all the people over here to get this out.

582
01:11:38,000 --> 01:11:47,000
Because I know I can envision so many fires, car fires, dumpster fires, industrial fires where I was standing knee deep in foam.

583
01:11:47,000 --> 01:11:54,000
And I mean, just the exposures are insane. And not only the fires I fought, but all the workouts I did in my gear,

584
01:11:54,000 --> 01:12:01,000
that my pores were open and absorbing even more. So I will be certainly buying some of this as well.

585
01:12:01,000 --> 01:12:10,000
But before I let you go, are there any other areas, any other topics, any other messages that you want to impart before we wrap up?

586
01:12:10,000 --> 01:12:19,000
I think it's quite important that we think about certain long term solutions.

587
01:12:19,000 --> 01:12:25,000
Because PFAS problem comes because these molecules are very resistant to degradation.

588
01:12:25,000 --> 01:12:30,000
And it means that they hang around for a long time. Unfortunately, we are where we are.

589
01:12:30,000 --> 01:12:34,000
I think the solution-wise also we have to think in a broad sense.

590
01:12:34,000 --> 01:12:43,000
That is, there's not going to be, it's not practically possible that we get rid of all the PFAS.

591
01:12:43,000 --> 01:12:53,000
And I think we need to think about living with PFAS that's around us. Even if we stop producing all PFAS production from tomorrow, it's still around there.

592
01:12:53,000 --> 01:12:59,000
I think from my perspective, where does it do the most harm? I think it does most harm within our body.

593
01:12:59,000 --> 01:13:02,000
So let's start thinking about how do we get rid of from our body.

594
01:13:02,000 --> 01:13:10,000
And I think this is how I think we need to systematically move forward, getting rid from the agriculture systems, farming systems, and so on and so forth.

595
01:13:10,000 --> 01:13:15,000
And I think that's the way forward.

596
01:13:15,000 --> 01:13:21,000
Maybe I would say that I think I would take this opportunity, James, to just to reach out and say,

597
01:13:21,000 --> 01:13:29,000
if anybody that is listening to this podcast feels that this is an important and interesting area,

598
01:13:29,000 --> 01:13:39,000
then we are looking for partners, any type of partner, I would say, that can help us to get this realized

599
01:13:39,000 --> 01:13:45,000
and to become a product that can help people that suffer from PFAS poisoning.

600
01:13:45,000 --> 01:13:51,000
Because we have started this process, but we can only do it together with partners.

601
01:13:51,000 --> 01:13:57,000
And like any other partner, we need manufacturing partners, we need distribution partners,

602
01:13:57,000 --> 01:14:03,000
we need getting it out into the community, whether that's through marketing or influencers.

603
01:14:03,000 --> 01:14:10,000
And we need also to get in contact with the customers that need this product.

604
01:14:10,000 --> 01:14:17,000
So I would just like to reach out and say we are a small company from Denmark.

605
01:14:17,000 --> 01:14:21,000
It has a good idea. We hope to be in the market by the end of 2026.

606
01:14:21,000 --> 01:14:37,000
But we need all the help we can to get this out to firefighters in the US and other personnel that has been poisoned by PFAS through their professional work.

607
01:14:37,000 --> 01:14:44,000
So, yeah.

608
01:14:44,000 --> 01:14:47,000
Well, thank you. I mean, there's one company that I'm going to connect you with.

609
01:14:47,000 --> 01:14:56,000
I think we talked about before. But yeah, I mean, as far as anyone else listening, please feel reach out to me through the website and I can connect you with these guys.

610
01:14:56,000 --> 01:14:59,000
I just want to thank you so much. It's been such an important conversation.

611
01:14:59,000 --> 01:15:04,000
I mean, I love the background stuff as well, kind of hearing, you know, your journey into science.

612
01:15:04,000 --> 01:15:10,000
But what you are doing, I mean, literally is going to change lives because this PFAS conversation, the fire service,

613
01:15:10,000 --> 01:15:22,000
literally only in the last couple of years has become a huge hot topic. And I hope that we'll see PFAS free gear, truly PFAS free gear, you know, emerging as an alternative for us now.

614
01:15:22,000 --> 01:15:26,000
But most of us, I'm sure, are wondering, well, what are we going to do with this that's already in our body?

615
01:15:26,000 --> 01:15:37,000
And if this really does show efficacy on the human trials, then this is going to be life changing, even if it's just for my profession, not to mention all the other ones.

616
01:15:37,000 --> 01:15:46,000
So I want to thank you both so much for your work and also for being so generous with your time and coming on the Behind the Shield podcast today.

617
01:15:46,000 --> 01:15:54,000
Thanks a lot, James, for, you know, taking up this very important topic on your podcast.

618
01:15:54,000 --> 01:16:11,000
Thank you very much, James. It was a pleasure talking to you and hope it was useful to you and to the others who are listening.