1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:03,700
I'm your host David Wand and welcome to episode five,

2
00:00:03,700 --> 00:00:06,280
part one, where we introduce a new

3
00:00:06,280 --> 00:00:08,840
international development organization.

4
00:00:08,840 --> 00:00:12,440
That international development organization is

5
00:00:12,440 --> 00:00:16,080
the Mennonite Development Associates,

6
00:00:16,080 --> 00:00:19,940
located headquarters in Waterloo, Canada.

7
00:00:19,940 --> 00:00:22,480
You can learn more about the Mennonite Development

8
00:00:22,480 --> 00:00:26,100
Associates International Development Organization

9
00:00:26,100 --> 00:00:31,100
by going to their website at www.meda.org.

10
00:00:33,800 --> 00:00:36,240
We're gonna be talking about one of the projects

11
00:00:36,240 --> 00:00:38,960
that they have been provided money from the government

12
00:00:38,960 --> 00:00:42,080
of Canada, courtesy of the Canadian taxpayer.

13
00:00:42,080 --> 00:00:47,080
This project cost the Canadian taxpayer $19,040,307.

14
00:00:51,020 --> 00:00:53,080
The title of this project is,

15
00:00:53,080 --> 00:00:57,160
A New Partnership for Sustainable Impact Investing

16
00:00:57,160 --> 00:00:59,080
in Frontier Markets.

17
00:01:00,640 --> 00:01:03,520
This project, unfortunately, doesn't specify

18
00:01:03,520 --> 00:01:06,060
the specific developing countries

19
00:01:06,060 --> 00:01:08,100
where these monies are spent.

20
00:01:08,100 --> 00:01:12,840
Instead, it only indicates that 30% of the $19 million

21
00:01:12,840 --> 00:01:17,840
will be spent in Africa, 30% spent in the Americas,

22
00:01:18,080 --> 00:01:22,480
and the remaining 40% being spent in Asia.

23
00:01:22,480 --> 00:01:25,880
I have acquired, through an access to information request,

24
00:01:25,880 --> 00:01:29,760
the performance measurement framework, or PMF,

25
00:01:29,760 --> 00:01:31,800
for this project.

26
00:01:31,800 --> 00:01:36,640
Reviewing the PMF, I have discovered there are nine outcomes

27
00:01:36,640 --> 00:01:41,000
that are expected to be achieved from this $19 million,

28
00:01:41,000 --> 00:01:45,640
and 23 outcome indicators are in the PMF

29
00:01:45,640 --> 00:01:49,200
that are being used to determine whether or not

30
00:01:49,200 --> 00:01:52,440
these nine outcomes have been achieved.

31
00:01:52,440 --> 00:01:55,720
Unfortunately, based on my review of all 23 outcome

32
00:01:55,720 --> 00:01:58,980
indicators, none of those indicators are able

33
00:01:58,980 --> 00:02:02,600
to adequately measure the achievement of the outcomes.

34
00:02:02,600 --> 00:02:05,780
Therefore, the Mennonite Development Associates

35
00:02:05,780 --> 00:02:09,320
cannot make the claim that they are achieving

36
00:02:09,320 --> 00:02:12,480
these nine outcomes based on the performance

37
00:02:12,480 --> 00:02:15,120
measurement framework that they have designed.

38
00:02:16,920 --> 00:02:19,400
So in this part one, I will just give you

39
00:02:19,400 --> 00:02:22,160
a brief description of what the services are

40
00:02:22,160 --> 00:02:25,800
that this $19 million is being paid for,

41
00:02:25,800 --> 00:02:27,680
and it falls into three areas.

42
00:02:27,680 --> 00:02:30,780
The first area is funds that are provided

43
00:02:30,780 --> 00:02:34,760
to investment firms, and funds or grants

44
00:02:34,760 --> 00:02:38,440
that are provided to small, medium enterprises.

45
00:02:38,440 --> 00:02:42,840
And a third component of this project is paying

46
00:02:42,840 --> 00:02:47,840
for Canadian firm managers, investment firm managers,

47
00:02:47,840 --> 00:02:52,840
to mentor investment firms in developing countries.

48
00:02:52,980 --> 00:02:57,440
That is, mentoring the managers of investment firms

49
00:02:57,440 --> 00:02:59,140
in developing countries.

50
00:03:00,980 --> 00:03:05,260
In those three areas, particularly investment funds

51
00:03:05,260 --> 00:03:09,340
and small, medium enterprises in these developing countries

52
00:03:09,340 --> 00:03:10,420
receive money.

53
00:03:11,360 --> 00:03:13,740
They also receive, these investment firms

54
00:03:13,740 --> 00:03:17,440
and small, medium enterprises, technical support

55
00:03:17,440 --> 00:03:20,540
on social and environmental principles

56
00:03:20,540 --> 00:03:24,300
so that they can access these funds from this project.

57
00:03:26,020 --> 00:03:28,540
And as I mentioned, the investment firms

58
00:03:28,540 --> 00:03:30,900
in these development countries, their managers

59
00:03:30,900 --> 00:03:34,820
also receive mentoring from investment fund managers

60
00:03:34,820 --> 00:03:35,820
from Canada.

61
00:03:37,060 --> 00:03:39,860
The small, medium enterprises receive grants

62
00:03:39,860 --> 00:03:41,460
for social innovation.

63
00:03:42,400 --> 00:03:45,420
And they also receive technical support

64
00:03:45,420 --> 00:03:47,400
on social innovation.

65
00:03:48,700 --> 00:03:51,320
So basically, those are what the funds,

66
00:03:51,320 --> 00:03:53,740
the $19 million are used for.

67
00:03:54,980 --> 00:03:59,220
And what I'm now going to do is give you two examples

68
00:03:59,220 --> 00:04:02,940
of outcomes from the performance measurement framework

69
00:04:02,940 --> 00:04:05,700
where the indicator, the outcome indicator

70
00:04:05,700 --> 00:04:08,700
that's been designed to determine whether or not

71
00:04:08,700 --> 00:04:13,080
the outcome has been achieved is flawed.

72
00:04:13,080 --> 00:04:15,700
So we'll start with this outcome from the performance

73
00:04:15,700 --> 00:04:17,220
measurement framework.

74
00:04:17,220 --> 00:04:21,340
The outcome is strengthened management capacity

75
00:04:21,340 --> 00:04:25,820
amongst investment fund managers in selected countries.

76
00:04:27,340 --> 00:04:30,620
The indicator for measuring this strengthened

77
00:04:30,620 --> 00:04:33,700
management capacity is, and I quote,

78
00:04:33,700 --> 00:04:36,020
level of business skills and knowledge

79
00:04:36,020 --> 00:04:39,980
among mentored fund managers.

80
00:04:39,980 --> 00:04:42,200
Sounds pretty good.

81
00:04:42,200 --> 00:04:44,980
It sounds like they're ready to measure some skills

82
00:04:44,980 --> 00:04:46,460
and knowledge levels.

83
00:04:46,460 --> 00:04:48,820
But unfortunately, when you look at the performance

84
00:04:48,820 --> 00:04:52,340
measurement framework, once again, it falls into

85
00:04:52,340 --> 00:04:55,380
the problem of self-reporting bias,

86
00:04:55,380 --> 00:04:58,860
where these mentored fund managers are themselves

87
00:04:58,860 --> 00:05:02,340
expected to self-assess their quote,

88
00:05:02,340 --> 00:05:05,220
acquisition of knowledge and skill,

89
00:05:05,220 --> 00:05:08,820
rather than being tested objectively on their knowledge

90
00:05:08,820 --> 00:05:13,820
and skill levels regarding how to work as a fund manager

91
00:05:17,220 --> 00:05:19,880
in terms of their management capacity.

92
00:05:20,780 --> 00:05:23,100
They need to be objectively tested on their knowledge

93
00:05:23,100 --> 00:05:24,100
and skill levels.

94
00:05:24,100 --> 00:05:27,300
So that's the problem with that indicator.

95
00:05:27,300 --> 00:05:30,660
Even though it sounds good, it's only by getting a hold

96
00:05:30,660 --> 00:05:34,140
of the performance measurement framework that we see

97
00:05:34,140 --> 00:05:37,380
that once again, there's a bias and they're being asked

98
00:05:37,380 --> 00:05:40,580
to self-assess themselves rather than being tested

99
00:05:40,580 --> 00:05:42,740
objectively from somebody externally.

100
00:05:43,940 --> 00:05:48,140
The second outcome that I'm going to look at is called

101
00:05:48,140 --> 00:05:52,580
strengthened business practices for economic growth,

102
00:05:52,580 --> 00:05:57,580
job creation, and social impact amongst investment firms

103
00:05:57,820 --> 00:06:00,540
and small, medium enterprises.

104
00:06:00,540 --> 00:06:04,260
The indicator to measure whether or not these

105
00:06:04,260 --> 00:06:08,620
strengthened business practices have been achieved is

106
00:06:08,620 --> 00:06:12,620
qualitative evidence of strengthened capacity

107
00:06:12,620 --> 00:06:17,340
of investment firms to promote improved social

108
00:06:17,340 --> 00:06:19,200
and environmental practices.

109
00:06:20,380 --> 00:06:23,620
The problem here again is self-reporting.

110
00:06:23,620 --> 00:06:27,300
These investment firms self-report their quote,

111
00:06:27,300 --> 00:06:31,140
strengthened capacity to promote through case studies

112
00:06:31,140 --> 00:06:34,940
and most significant change stories.

113
00:06:34,940 --> 00:06:37,500
Again, it would be better to test people in these

114
00:06:37,500 --> 00:06:40,860
investment firms on their knowledge of social

115
00:06:40,860 --> 00:06:45,580
and environmental principles, plus their skill levels

116
00:06:45,580 --> 00:06:48,920
on how to promote these principles.

117
00:06:50,380 --> 00:06:54,380
Plus, a comparison group of people in investment firms

118
00:06:54,380 --> 00:06:59,380
outside of this $19 million project would be also helpful

119
00:06:59,380 --> 00:07:04,220
so that you can show that the $19 million project

120
00:07:04,220 --> 00:07:06,780
had people at these investment firms that you were

121
00:07:06,780 --> 00:07:09,980
providing them with training and technical support

122
00:07:09,980 --> 00:07:11,660
on these principles.

123
00:07:11,660 --> 00:07:14,200
You would hope that they would have higher knowledge

124
00:07:14,200 --> 00:07:17,500
and skill levels on how to promote these social

125
00:07:17,500 --> 00:07:21,620
and environmental business practices compared to another

126
00:07:21,620 --> 00:07:25,180
group of people in investment firms that don't receive

127
00:07:25,180 --> 00:07:26,460
this project training.

128
00:07:26,460 --> 00:07:31,460
So in part two, we're going to invite the Mennonite

129
00:07:33,340 --> 00:07:38,340
Development Associates to respond to our critique

130
00:07:38,340 --> 00:07:43,340
of all 23 outcome indicators and why they're flawed.

131
00:07:44,740 --> 00:07:48,880
And we'll also have another evaluation expert on part two

132
00:07:48,880 --> 00:07:52,540
of the podcast who will work with me in going through

133
00:07:52,540 --> 00:07:56,140
at least nine of those outcome indicators to make sure

134
00:07:56,140 --> 00:07:59,660
that we cover all nine outcomes of the project.

135
00:07:59,660 --> 00:08:02,300
Hopefully we'll go through more than just nine outcome

136
00:08:02,300 --> 00:08:07,180
indicators and hopefully cover all 23 outcome indicators

137
00:08:07,180 --> 00:08:10,460
to explain how each one fails to properly measure

138
00:08:10,460 --> 00:08:11,300
the outcome.

139
00:08:11,300 --> 00:08:14,180
So stay tuned for part two where we will go through

140
00:08:14,180 --> 00:08:19,180
in more detail all 23 outcome indicators as to why they

141
00:08:20,460 --> 00:08:25,020
have a problem with not properly measuring the outcomes.

142
00:08:25,020 --> 00:08:27,220
So if you're interested in receiving the performance

143
00:08:27,220 --> 00:08:32,180
measurement framework for this project and also the outcome

144
00:08:32,180 --> 00:08:36,060
indicator summary for all 23 outcome indicators,

145
00:08:36,060 --> 00:08:40,620
explaining which of the five problem areas each outcome

146
00:08:40,620 --> 00:08:44,300
indicator falls into, feel free to send me an email

147
00:08:44,300 --> 00:08:49,300
at evaluatecanadaaid at gmail.com.

148
00:08:49,460 --> 00:08:53,420
And if there's any evaluation experts out there who would

149
00:08:53,420 --> 00:08:57,740
be interested in being on a part two of the podcast

150
00:08:57,740 --> 00:09:00,700
where we go into depth on each outcome indicator,

151
00:09:02,180 --> 00:09:05,460
feel free to email me and I will send you the remaining

152
00:09:05,460 --> 00:09:07,860
performance measurement frameworks that I have

153
00:09:07,860 --> 00:09:12,820
for season one and you can choose one and then I can also

154
00:09:12,820 --> 00:09:17,020
send you the notes that I have from my perspective

155
00:09:17,020 --> 00:09:20,300
of why the outcome indicators are flawed or not.

156
00:09:20,300 --> 00:09:23,260
I look forward to doing part two and stay tuned for part

157
00:09:23,260 --> 00:09:27,980
two which will be coming up very soon in a couple of weeks.

158
00:09:27,980 --> 00:09:56,820
Bye for now.

