WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:03.220
Hello everyone, my name is Ryan and welcome to

00:00:03.220 --> 00:00:07.480
The Vegan Report. Today we talk about sharing

00:00:07.480 --> 00:00:11.400
our vegan diets with the cats and dogs in our

00:00:11.400 --> 00:00:16.300
life. I have a cat. She is old, has been with

00:00:16.300 --> 00:00:20.339
me since before I was vegan, since high school.

00:00:20.839 --> 00:00:24.160
I was thinking of her during this conversation.

00:00:24.739 --> 00:00:29.309
I care a lot about her. and that means being

00:00:29.309 --> 00:00:34.390
very careful about what I feed her. And I don't

00:00:34.390 --> 00:00:38.270
know about you, but I have been reluctant to

00:00:38.270 --> 00:00:42.670
feed her a vegan diet. So for me, this conversation

00:00:42.670 --> 00:00:46.009
was a chance to question the science and studies

00:00:46.009 --> 00:00:50.770
behind vegan cat food. But this was also a chance

00:00:50.770 --> 00:00:54.770
to ask, are we offsetting the good of adopting

00:00:54.770 --> 00:00:58.570
dogs and cats from shelters by feeding them dead

00:00:58.570 --> 00:01:02.890
chickens and cows? Why is the animal rights world

00:01:02.890 --> 00:01:06.810
so behind on addressing the issue of pet food

00:01:06.810 --> 00:01:12.670
diets? Is the word pet offensive? And much more.

00:01:13.670 --> 00:01:16.870
To discuss this topic I have with me Billy Nichols.

00:01:17.510 --> 00:01:20.209
Billy is a researcher specializing in the pet

00:01:20.209 --> 00:01:24.430
food protein transition. He is based at Bryant

00:01:24.430 --> 00:01:28.969
Research, a UK research consultancy specializing

00:01:28.969 --> 00:01:32.250
in the protein transition, where he conducts

00:01:32.250 --> 00:01:36.769
research related to pet diets with a focus on

00:01:36.769 --> 00:01:40.549
the environmental impacts of meat -based and

00:01:40.549 --> 00:01:45.150
vegan pet foods. He has published on the sustainability

00:01:45.150 --> 00:01:49.909
of pet diets and on consumer attitudes towards

00:01:49.909 --> 00:01:54.780
alternative proteins. He was also formerly a

00:01:54.780 --> 00:01:58.560
founder's associate at Omni, one of the UK's

00:01:58.560 --> 00:02:02.540
leading vegan pet food companies. To learn more

00:02:02.540 --> 00:02:06.939
about Billy and his great work, visit the episode

00:02:06.939 --> 00:02:13.259
notes. And as always, if you appreciate this

00:02:13.259 --> 00:02:18.219
type of conversations, follow or subscribe to

00:02:18.219 --> 00:02:22.199
the podcast for more. Please support the podcast

00:02:22.199 --> 00:02:26.259
by sharing it with your fellow vegans, with your

00:02:26.259 --> 00:02:31.020
friends and family. Leave a good review. Every

00:02:31.020 --> 00:02:37.340
gesture counts. Thank you. Okay, so Billy, thank

00:02:37.340 --> 00:02:39.780
you so much for having accepted my invitation.

00:02:40.340 --> 00:02:43.039
Welcome to The Vegan Report. Thank you very much,

00:02:43.120 --> 00:02:44.439
Ryan. It's a pleasure to be here. Glad to be

00:02:44.439 --> 00:02:48.360
on the show. So I want to start with a question

00:02:48.360 --> 00:02:54.319
I had in mind for this week, this entire week,

00:02:54.400 --> 00:02:57.319
as I was thinking about the conversation we were

00:02:57.319 --> 00:03:02.199
about to have. Cats are carnivorous creatures,

00:03:02.360 --> 00:03:07.819
and I feel deeply uncomfortable in feeding my

00:03:07.819 --> 00:03:12.889
cat a vegan diet. What do you make of you know,

00:03:12.889 --> 00:03:15.449
what is this the state of research around that

00:03:15.449 --> 00:03:21.449
issue and why do I feel so? Hesitant in feeding

00:03:21.449 --> 00:03:24.889
my cat a vegan diet Brilliant. I love this way.

00:03:25.030 --> 00:03:26.990
We're going straight into the deep end. This

00:03:26.990 --> 00:03:30.370
is really the sort of big probably most controversial

00:03:30.370 --> 00:03:34.389
question in the Pet food protein transition the

00:03:34.389 --> 00:03:37.710
vegan pet food space So let's get right into

00:03:37.710 --> 00:03:40.419
it. It's worth saying Why would we think about

00:03:40.419 --> 00:03:41.939
this in the first place, right? There's got to

00:03:41.939 --> 00:03:44.560
be motivations for this. And there's quite a

00:03:44.560 --> 00:03:46.199
few when it comes to the diets of our dogs and

00:03:46.199 --> 00:03:48.319
cats. I'm sure we'll get into it, but dogs and

00:03:48.319 --> 00:03:50.439
cats consume a lot of meat. There's ethical implications

00:03:50.439 --> 00:03:52.939
there. There's environmental implications, obviously,

00:03:52.960 --> 00:03:55.719
that go with it. But on top of that, there's

00:03:55.719 --> 00:03:57.520
growing body of evidence to show that there's

00:03:57.520 --> 00:04:00.139
health implications with the current meat -based

00:04:00.139 --> 00:04:02.659
diets that our dogs and cats are eating. So there

00:04:02.659 --> 00:04:04.979
we go. There's some motivation similar to the

00:04:04.979 --> 00:04:08.219
human space for a transition. That's motivated.

00:04:09.020 --> 00:04:12.639
guardians, another word for owners. So that's

00:04:12.639 --> 00:04:14.539
motivated dog and cat guardians to think about

00:04:14.539 --> 00:04:16.759
a transition and whether that's possible. And

00:04:16.759 --> 00:04:18.699
it's also motivated researchers like myself and

00:04:18.699 --> 00:04:21.800
others to think about the implications of feeding

00:04:21.800 --> 00:04:24.639
our dogs and cats vegan diets. So let's start

00:04:24.639 --> 00:04:27.779
with cats, as you say, I'm interested and thrilled

00:04:27.779 --> 00:04:29.740
to hear that you feel inconvertible, perhaps

00:04:29.740 --> 00:04:31.699
by the end of this conversation, you might feel

00:04:31.699 --> 00:04:35.259
slightly differently. There's a premise here

00:04:35.259 --> 00:04:37.600
before we get to the research when it comes to

00:04:37.660 --> 00:04:39.819
transitioning dogs and cats onto vegan diets.

00:04:40.360 --> 00:04:43.579
And we'll start, as you say, with cats. Cats

00:04:43.579 --> 00:04:45.639
are obligate carnivores. That's correct. What

00:04:45.639 --> 00:04:48.240
does obligate carnivore mean? It means that they

00:04:48.240 --> 00:04:50.779
require certain nutrients that aren't typically

00:04:50.779 --> 00:04:53.199
found in plant -based sources. They're typically

00:04:53.199 --> 00:04:55.600
found in animal -based sources. These are things

00:04:55.600 --> 00:04:59.860
like taurine, vitamin A, to name a couple. And

00:04:59.860 --> 00:05:02.699
so in the wild, cats certainly would need to

00:05:02.699 --> 00:05:04.459
eat these meat -based ingredients in order to

00:05:04.459 --> 00:05:08.199
thrive. and receive the nutrients that they need

00:05:08.199 --> 00:05:12.220
to survive and thrive. However, there's a sort

00:05:12.220 --> 00:05:14.339
of specificity here that's worth remembering.

00:05:15.279 --> 00:05:17.060
The fact that they're obligate carnivores is

00:05:17.060 --> 00:05:19.620
based on the premise that they need certain nutrients

00:05:19.620 --> 00:05:21.620
that typically come from animal -based sources.

00:05:21.879 --> 00:05:24.540
That doesn't mean that they need the ingredients

00:05:24.540 --> 00:05:27.240
that you will usually find those nutrients in.

00:05:27.339 --> 00:05:29.779
Right. It just means they need those nutrients.

00:05:30.019 --> 00:05:32.139
So then the question becomes, can we find those

00:05:32.139 --> 00:05:35.100
nutrients from sources other than animal products

00:05:35.100 --> 00:05:38.399
in the wild? No. Right. You're basically getting

00:05:38.399 --> 00:05:41.420
these from from animal flesh, animal flesh, animal

00:05:41.420 --> 00:05:43.779
protein, or the cat is probably going to survive.

00:05:43.819 --> 00:05:46.620
But we're obviously quite a way away from these

00:05:46.620 --> 00:05:48.620
wild environments when it comes to domesticated

00:05:48.620 --> 00:05:51.920
dogs and cats now. And certainly most of the

00:05:51.920 --> 00:05:53.680
pet foods that we feed to our dogs and cats.

00:05:53.980 --> 00:05:58.139
are synthetically substituted with some of these

00:05:58.139 --> 00:06:00.660
nutrients, taurine, vitamin A to name a couple.

00:06:00.959 --> 00:06:03.699
So actually you can synthetically create these

00:06:03.699 --> 00:06:05.819
nutrients that typically animals and you know

00:06:05.819 --> 00:06:09.519
cats would would require meat to get. You can

00:06:09.519 --> 00:06:12.310
now synthetically substitute them with no animals

00:06:12.310 --> 00:06:15.230
required so there's the premise right there's

00:06:15.230 --> 00:06:18.490
the premise for feeding a cat a vegan diet you

00:06:18.490 --> 00:06:21.350
can obtain the same nutrients that cats need

00:06:21.350 --> 00:06:25.129
that were you know were necessary from meat from

00:06:25.129 --> 00:06:27.149
synthetic sources and you can supplement them

00:06:27.149 --> 00:06:29.370
into a diet much in the same way that humans

00:06:29.370 --> 00:06:32.490
will supplement say b12 into their diet usually

00:06:32.490 --> 00:06:34.610
there's the premise the next thing you asked

00:06:34.610 --> 00:06:37.290
was well what do we know what does the research

00:06:37.290 --> 00:06:41.930
say right and the research for cats i would described

00:06:41.930 --> 00:06:46.370
so far as positive, and we'd like more of it.

00:06:46.430 --> 00:06:50.470
Right. So we've got three studies looking at

00:06:50.470 --> 00:06:54.290
the health impacts of cats fed vegan versus meat

00:06:54.290 --> 00:06:57.829
based diets. All three of those studies so far

00:06:57.829 --> 00:07:02.069
show that cats fed vegan diets will have health

00:07:02.069 --> 00:07:05.329
outcomes on average as good as or better than

00:07:05.329 --> 00:07:08.009
those on meat based diets. These are typically

00:07:08.009 --> 00:07:09.889
survey based studies. So it's sending surveys

00:07:09.889 --> 00:07:13.310
out to typically, you know, 2000, let's say,

00:07:13.449 --> 00:07:16.670
guardians or cat owners, working out what they're

00:07:16.670 --> 00:07:18.490
fed with a meat based or vegan diet, and then

00:07:18.490 --> 00:07:20.569
asking the owner to give indications of their

00:07:20.569 --> 00:07:22.250
health, you know, what does their health look

00:07:22.250 --> 00:07:23.990
like? What does the vet say about their health?

00:07:24.050 --> 00:07:26.149
How many times they go to the vet? And typically

00:07:26.149 --> 00:07:29.170
those studies find that cats fed vegan diets

00:07:29.170 --> 00:07:31.730
have health outcomes as good as or indeed better

00:07:31.730 --> 00:07:33.670
than those on conventional meat based diets.

00:07:34.250 --> 00:07:36.250
So there's the evidence as it stands, and there's

00:07:36.250 --> 00:07:40.259
the theory that supports it. Perhaps you'll agree

00:07:40.259 --> 00:07:42.639
with me to say that that's essentially a promising

00:07:42.639 --> 00:07:46.060
start to feeding a cat a vegan diet. What we'd

00:07:46.060 --> 00:07:48.899
probably want now is some more research, particularly

00:07:48.899 --> 00:07:52.220
clinical studies looking at various health indicators

00:07:52.220 --> 00:07:55.680
in a clinical setting to confirm that research

00:07:55.680 --> 00:07:57.680
and improve the evidence base. But certainly

00:07:57.680 --> 00:08:00.339
so far, I think there's a good theory and good

00:08:00.339 --> 00:08:03.339
evidence so far to show that cats can be fed

00:08:03.339 --> 00:08:07.550
vegan diets and thrive, as you said. That's fascinating.

00:08:07.870 --> 00:08:12.490
So those studies were surveys, but people can

00:08:12.490 --> 00:08:16.970
lie about, you know, the state of their animals.

00:08:18.430 --> 00:08:22.709
And if you send a survey to a vegan who's feeding

00:08:22.709 --> 00:08:25.449
their cat, you know, a vegan diet, what stops

00:08:25.449 --> 00:08:27.629
them from saying, you know, yeah, like it is

00:08:27.629 --> 00:08:31.689
super healthy, like he's, you know, living a

00:08:31.689 --> 00:08:36.309
good life and all of that. So Yeah, what do you

00:08:36.309 --> 00:08:38.789
make of that? Yeah, it's a great question. I

00:08:38.789 --> 00:08:40.710
mean, you've essentially identified one of the

00:08:40.710 --> 00:08:43.570
method of methodological methodological Let's

00:08:43.570 --> 00:08:45.210
see that one more time. Yeah, it's a great question.

00:08:45.210 --> 00:08:47.710
You've essentially identified one of the methodological

00:08:47.710 --> 00:08:50.600
limitations of the evidence base as it stands,

00:08:50.840 --> 00:08:53.059
right? So typically for this, you know, these

00:08:53.059 --> 00:08:56.379
studies are survey based. And there's there's

00:08:56.379 --> 00:08:59.100
naturally going to be bias, probably on both

00:08:59.100 --> 00:09:01.340
sides, right? But we can definitely see bias

00:09:01.340 --> 00:09:03.879
for the the vegan cat guardians, right? We can

00:09:03.879 --> 00:09:08.120
see them potentially over estimating or overstating

00:09:08.120 --> 00:09:11.700
the health benefits on a vegan diet. So I think

00:09:11.700 --> 00:09:14.220
what that says is we really want some more research.

00:09:14.409 --> 00:09:16.710
to either confirm or deny the findings we've

00:09:16.710 --> 00:09:18.549
got so far. As I've said, the findings so far

00:09:18.549 --> 00:09:23.970
seem positive. They align with the theory of

00:09:23.970 --> 00:09:26.809
feeding cats a vegan diet. They certainly align

00:09:26.809 --> 00:09:29.549
with the fact that actually many cat foods today

00:09:29.549 --> 00:09:32.889
that are meat -based will have the same synthetic

00:09:32.889 --> 00:09:35.429
taurine substituted into those diets because

00:09:35.429 --> 00:09:38.710
the processing of often poor quality meat -based

00:09:38.710 --> 00:09:42.070
ingredients in meat -based cat food means that

00:09:42.070 --> 00:09:44.909
often these nutrients such as taurine will get

00:09:44.909 --> 00:09:47.029
degraded and then they're synthetically substituted

00:09:47.029 --> 00:09:49.769
back in. If you have a cat at home and you feed

00:09:49.769 --> 00:09:51.169
them with meat -based food, you might want to

00:09:51.169 --> 00:09:53.269
have a look on the back of the packaging, look

00:09:53.269 --> 00:09:56.879
for substitutions or nutritional additives. see

00:09:56.879 --> 00:09:59.179
if taurine's in there. If it is, it might say

00:09:59.179 --> 00:10:01.019
it's from a synthetic source. It usually is.

00:10:01.320 --> 00:10:02.919
And that shows you that actually this is the

00:10:02.919 --> 00:10:04.539
same source of taurine that's going to be in

00:10:04.539 --> 00:10:07.799
vegan cat foods as well. So as I said, there's

00:10:07.799 --> 00:10:09.940
theory that's positive and there's some research

00:10:09.940 --> 00:10:12.019
that's positive, but really we'd love to see

00:10:12.019 --> 00:10:15.960
more that proves this in a clinical setting as

00:10:15.960 --> 00:10:21.500
well. However, my... My position on this as someone

00:10:21.500 --> 00:10:24.259
who is advocating for a protein transition is

00:10:24.259 --> 00:10:27.120
to say what we should be cautious and we should

00:10:27.120 --> 00:10:31.000
ensure the good health of our companion animals

00:10:31.000 --> 00:10:34.700
while we facilitate this transition. This is

00:10:34.700 --> 00:10:38.740
a promising body of evidence that we should I

00:10:38.740 --> 00:10:42.320
think begin to act on because we are aware and

00:10:42.320 --> 00:10:44.440
perhaps will come into this in a second but we

00:10:44.440 --> 00:10:47.620
are aware of the significance ethical environmental.

00:10:48.080 --> 00:10:51.799
and emerging health issues associated with feeding

00:10:51.799 --> 00:10:58.240
dogs and cats meat -based diets. So I think your

00:10:58.240 --> 00:11:02.120
desire for a stronger evidence base is really

00:11:02.120 --> 00:11:04.460
commendable. But at the same time, I don't think

00:11:04.460 --> 00:11:08.419
we should necessarily let that hold us back from

00:11:08.419 --> 00:11:10.919
recognizing the significant benefits of a pet

00:11:10.919 --> 00:11:14.950
food protein transition and where we feel comfortable

00:11:14.950 --> 00:11:16.950
to do so and where the research is credible,

00:11:17.029 --> 00:11:20.049
facilitating that transition as quickly as possible.

00:11:21.470 --> 00:11:25.370
Of course. And what is the opinion of veterinarians

00:11:25.370 --> 00:11:30.250
on this issue? Yeah, great question. So the research

00:11:30.250 --> 00:11:34.230
on the health benefits or health impacts of dogs

00:11:34.230 --> 00:11:37.730
and cats, fed vegan diets is relatively new,

00:11:37.889 --> 00:11:41.190
I would say between sort of two and maybe at

00:11:41.190 --> 00:11:44.250
a maximum 10 years old. There were some studies

00:11:44.250 --> 00:11:46.690
that were done before that, but they're relatively

00:11:46.690 --> 00:11:49.929
sparse and typically poorer methods as well.

00:11:50.950 --> 00:11:53.409
So essentially this body of research showing

00:11:53.409 --> 00:11:56.840
that dogs and cats seem to have... as good as

00:11:56.840 --> 00:11:59.679
or better health outcomes on vegan diets compared

00:11:59.679 --> 00:12:02.639
to meat -based diets is really new. And obviously,

00:12:02.899 --> 00:12:04.559
whenever a new body of research comes into the

00:12:04.559 --> 00:12:06.240
scientific literature, it then takes time for

00:12:06.240 --> 00:12:10.440
that to filter out into the relevant bodies and

00:12:10.440 --> 00:12:12.340
groups of professionals and also the wider population

00:12:12.340 --> 00:12:15.799
as well. That's exactly what we're seeing essentially

00:12:15.799 --> 00:12:19.509
when it comes to this field. uh it was the case

00:12:19.509 --> 00:12:21.809
probably you know five ten years ago that ask

00:12:21.809 --> 00:12:24.649
any vet you could find and they would speak with

00:12:24.649 --> 00:12:27.669
quite some concern um and probably strong criticism

00:12:27.669 --> 00:12:30.330
on the idea of feeding dogs and cats vegan diets

00:12:30.330 --> 00:12:32.309
um there were some people out there who have

00:12:32.309 --> 00:12:34.289
been cited in the in the literature who were

00:12:34.289 --> 00:12:37.309
basically saying look this is probably a a violation

00:12:37.309 --> 00:12:39.789
of the animal welfare standards in for example

00:12:39.789 --> 00:12:42.870
the uk um because this is not going to meet the

00:12:42.870 --> 00:12:44.710
you know health requirements of dogs and cats

00:12:44.710 --> 00:12:46.529
and maybe not the the taste requirements of dogs

00:12:46.529 --> 00:12:48.080
and cats either you know they be fed a tasty

00:12:48.080 --> 00:12:50.340
food and apparently vegan foods wouldn't be wouldn't

00:12:50.340 --> 00:12:53.120
be tasty. However over time that is changing

00:12:53.120 --> 00:12:55.899
and we are seeing a transition. A good example

00:12:55.899 --> 00:12:58.840
of that is the British Veterinary Association

00:12:58.840 --> 00:13:02.940
which it was pretty much this time a year ago

00:13:02.940 --> 00:13:06.799
retracted their opposition to the use of vegan

00:13:06.799 --> 00:13:11.559
diets in dogs. So that is one relatively strong

00:13:11.559 --> 00:13:14.240
veterinary body accepting this evidence and changing

00:13:14.240 --> 00:13:17.899
their policies and stances as a result. And on

00:13:17.899 --> 00:13:21.000
top of that, you will also see a change on the

00:13:21.000 --> 00:13:23.340
ground in veterinary communities. I don't have

00:13:23.340 --> 00:13:26.820
a quantifiable estimate for you there. But I

00:13:26.820 --> 00:13:28.980
can say that I attend many of the veterinary

00:13:28.980 --> 00:13:31.860
conferences in the UK and speak to vets on this

00:13:31.860 --> 00:13:36.620
issue and advocate for this research and a transition

00:13:36.620 --> 00:13:40.480
as a result. And typically, you know, the more

00:13:40.480 --> 00:13:42.340
times I've been, you know, I've now been to these

00:13:42.340 --> 00:13:44.820
conferences for years at a time, you do hear

00:13:44.820 --> 00:13:48.340
more vets being more open to this idea and more

00:13:48.340 --> 00:13:51.100
supportive as a result. Obviously, vets are,

00:13:51.100 --> 00:13:53.820
you know, have rigorous scientific training and

00:13:53.820 --> 00:13:56.659
are motivated to follow evidence as it evolves.

00:13:58.259 --> 00:14:00.360
And generally speaking, I think we are seeing

00:14:00.360 --> 00:14:03.399
that movement in the veterinary community. Of

00:14:03.399 --> 00:14:05.600
course, there's still a lot more work to do.

00:14:06.689 --> 00:14:08.789
partly to advocate for this research and partly

00:14:08.789 --> 00:14:11.549
to challenge the ties between the meat -based

00:14:11.549 --> 00:14:13.929
pet food industry and veterinary communities

00:14:13.929 --> 00:14:19.009
as well. But I'm certainly seeing a change and

00:14:19.009 --> 00:14:20.789
the change in policy from the British Veterinary

00:14:20.789 --> 00:14:22.769
Association is, I think, a good example of that.

00:14:23.350 --> 00:14:27.929
Let's talk about the available cat pet food out

00:14:27.929 --> 00:14:30.809
there because there's the issue of, you know,

00:14:30.809 --> 00:14:37.100
can cats survive, thrive in a on a vegan diet.

00:14:37.679 --> 00:14:40.840
And then there's the question of, beyond that,

00:14:41.840 --> 00:14:46.120
is there pet food available that will address

00:14:46.120 --> 00:14:50.879
those nutrients needs that you highlighted earlier?

00:14:51.279 --> 00:14:55.080
So for instance, the taurine. And can we trust

00:14:55.080 --> 00:15:03.059
pet food companies to provide good, healthy options

00:15:03.059 --> 00:15:07.950
of cat pet food? uh to owners or guardians as

00:15:07.950 --> 00:15:12.210
you call them any comment about that uh yeah

00:15:12.210 --> 00:15:14.649
look great question you know if we want to try

00:15:14.649 --> 00:15:17.870
this out what do we do um there's one point that's

00:15:17.870 --> 00:15:20.090
really important and that i'll probably repeat

00:15:20.090 --> 00:15:23.669
because it's worth saying um it is strongly recommended

00:15:23.669 --> 00:15:29.009
that you find um reputable commercial nutritionally

00:15:29.009 --> 00:15:32.629
sound nutritionally complete foods rather than

00:15:32.629 --> 00:15:36.519
uh making your own um home -cooked diets for

00:15:36.519 --> 00:15:39.539
dogs and cats are an option and some people go

00:15:39.539 --> 00:15:43.299
for them, but it is very difficult to home formulate

00:15:43.299 --> 00:15:45.320
a nutritionally complete diet. And typically

00:15:45.320 --> 00:15:47.799
what you'll see, even if a veterinary nutritionist

00:15:47.799 --> 00:15:49.940
were to do this for their own animal, is that

00:15:49.940 --> 00:15:54.519
nutritional deficiencies will creep in. So when

00:15:54.519 --> 00:15:56.779
I talk about a transition, what I'm not advocating

00:15:56.779 --> 00:16:00.139
for is that everyone simply cooks their own vegan

00:16:00.139 --> 00:16:03.340
food for their dogs and cats. And so we want

00:16:03.340 --> 00:16:04.460
to be looking at the things that you were talking

00:16:04.460 --> 00:16:06.600
about, which is what's available at the moment.

00:16:07.039 --> 00:16:09.700
And what you should look for is nutritionally

00:16:09.700 --> 00:16:11.440
sound and nutritionally complete products. How

00:16:11.440 --> 00:16:14.200
can you tell? It's often hard, but there are

00:16:14.200 --> 00:16:17.360
often ways to find this. For example, in Europe,

00:16:17.740 --> 00:16:20.220
there are a set of nutrition standards guidelines

00:16:20.220 --> 00:16:24.740
called the Fedia standards. And typically you

00:16:24.740 --> 00:16:27.200
can see that pet food companies will comply to

00:16:27.200 --> 00:16:28.720
those standards. That means essentially that

00:16:28.720 --> 00:16:31.929
there'll be nutritionally sound. And you can

00:16:31.929 --> 00:16:34.009
also look on the back of the package as well

00:16:34.009 --> 00:16:36.710
and look at the ingredients in nutritional additives.

00:16:37.629 --> 00:16:40.629
You obviously might not be a you know, a veteran

00:16:40.629 --> 00:16:42.129
nutritionist yourself, so you might not understand

00:16:42.129 --> 00:16:44.370
completely what a diet is, what a nutritionally

00:16:44.370 --> 00:16:47.690
sound diet is. But that's another way to look

00:16:47.690 --> 00:16:50.409
at the essentially the reputability of a commercial

00:16:50.409 --> 00:16:53.370
company. It should be very clear. which ingredients

00:16:53.370 --> 00:16:55.450
are in the pet food, what the nutritional additives

00:16:55.450 --> 00:16:57.129
are, and that should be all freely available

00:16:57.129 --> 00:16:58.970
on the website and obviously on the products

00:16:58.970 --> 00:17:01.450
as well. So those are some things to look out

00:17:01.450 --> 00:17:06.130
for. Once you find those products and you can

00:17:06.130 --> 00:17:08.130
see that these are reputable commercial companies

00:17:08.130 --> 00:17:10.589
selling a nutritionally sound food, that's the

00:17:10.589 --> 00:17:12.769
time where you might feel comfortable to buy

00:17:12.769 --> 00:17:15.670
one and try transitioning your dog on cats. onto

00:17:15.670 --> 00:17:18.309
that food, obviously carefully monitoring them

00:17:18.309 --> 00:17:20.369
as you do so, as you would do when transitioning

00:17:20.369 --> 00:17:23.230
to any other food. But at that point, once you

00:17:23.230 --> 00:17:24.910
found a commercial company with a nutritionally

00:17:24.910 --> 00:17:27.329
sound food that seems reputable in your eyes,

00:17:27.349 --> 00:17:29.849
perhaps it's endorsed by veterinarians, they've

00:17:29.849 --> 00:17:31.990
used veterinarians in the formulation process,

00:17:32.369 --> 00:17:34.569
that's when you should feel more confident that

00:17:34.569 --> 00:17:37.990
the product is nutritionally sound. One more

00:17:37.990 --> 00:17:40.490
thing to add is that a study was done into the

00:17:40.490 --> 00:17:42.509
nutritional soundness of meat -based versus vegan

00:17:42.509 --> 00:17:46.009
pet foods. This was few years ago now I think

00:17:46.009 --> 00:17:48.910
and that found essentially no difference between

00:17:48.910 --> 00:17:50.809
the nutritional soundness of vegan versus meat

00:17:50.809 --> 00:17:55.130
-based pet foods. It in fact found that on average

00:17:55.130 --> 00:17:57.509
typically the vegan pet foods are more likely

00:17:57.509 --> 00:17:59.930
to meet all the nutritional requirements and

00:17:59.930 --> 00:18:01.970
it was theorized that that may be because there's

00:18:01.970 --> 00:18:03.750
much more scrutiny on these foods and therefore

00:18:03.750 --> 00:18:05.630
they are more careful with their formulation.

00:18:06.730 --> 00:18:09.099
But certainly we have peer -reviewed academic

00:18:09.099 --> 00:18:11.519
research out there to show that there's not a

00:18:11.519 --> 00:18:12.859
significant difference between the nutritional

00:18:12.859 --> 00:18:14.759
soundness of vegan and meat -based fat foods.

00:18:16.240 --> 00:18:21.039
And that includes cats. Indeed, yeah, that's

00:18:21.039 --> 00:18:23.779
dog and fat foods, if I'm not mistaken. What

00:18:23.779 --> 00:18:26.900
I will do, I realize I've been citing various

00:18:26.900 --> 00:18:28.900
studies as we've gone through our conversation,

00:18:29.339 --> 00:18:32.630
I'll make sure that there's some references to

00:18:32.630 --> 00:18:34.490
those that are sent to you. And perhaps you can

00:18:34.490 --> 00:18:36.329
include the show notes if you're able to, so

00:18:36.329 --> 00:18:37.630
that people can have a look at these studies

00:18:37.630 --> 00:18:41.089
as well if they'd like to. Of course, they will

00:18:41.089 --> 00:18:45.069
be available in the episode notes. Um, yeah,

00:18:45.170 --> 00:18:49.910
I guess I'm I'm less afraid about feeding a vegan

00:18:49.910 --> 00:18:55.250
diet to a dog. I had a conversation with the

00:18:55.250 --> 00:19:02.059
owner, the mom of brambles. uh you yeah uh so

00:19:02.059 --> 00:19:07.839
it's been done um and experimented with since

00:19:07.839 --> 00:19:13.200
you know the 1980s 1960s i i think i have to

00:19:13.200 --> 00:19:17.880
check um but cats you know for me cats are are

00:19:17.880 --> 00:19:21.180
just natural killers you know i i see that in

00:19:21.180 --> 00:19:26.200
my cats they're um killer instincts and I just

00:19:26.200 --> 00:19:29.900
feel weird feed them a vegan diet. Yeah, look,

00:19:30.019 --> 00:19:32.480
I mean, I think you speak to a sort of concern

00:19:32.480 --> 00:19:33.980
or a feeling that a lot of people have, right?

00:19:34.140 --> 00:19:37.099
It does feel perhaps instinctively a little bit

00:19:37.099 --> 00:19:39.839
strange. Cats feel like carnivores. They feel

00:19:39.839 --> 00:19:42.359
like killers. You might often see your cat, you

00:19:42.359 --> 00:19:44.180
know, pouncing at a mouse in the in the back

00:19:44.180 --> 00:19:47.640
garden. And so it feels strange then given the

00:19:47.640 --> 00:19:50.470
plant based food. I think it's worth reflecting

00:19:50.470 --> 00:19:52.970
on the fact that this is a sort of effective

00:19:52.970 --> 00:19:58.130
feeling that currently is going against the a

00:19:58.130 --> 00:20:00.750
grain of scientific evidence in this field that's

00:20:00.750 --> 00:20:02.910
totally okay right we often feel that certain

00:20:02.910 --> 00:20:04.769
things particularly things that are connected

00:20:04.769 --> 00:20:07.230
to nature feel a certain way they feel right

00:20:07.230 --> 00:20:09.049
you know we talk a lot in the in the vegan space

00:20:09.049 --> 00:20:11.789
about ultra processed food right and how food

00:20:11.789 --> 00:20:14.309
that's ultra processed feels like it's bad and

00:20:14.309 --> 00:20:16.869
feels like it's unhealthy but in some cases you

00:20:16.869 --> 00:20:19.390
know plant -based meat is an example it can actually

00:20:19.390 --> 00:20:22.930
be superior to alternatives um so i think the

00:20:22.930 --> 00:20:26.289
the you know my feeling on what you've expressed

00:20:26.289 --> 00:20:28.839
there is that but it's a totally understandable

00:20:28.839 --> 00:20:32.440
sense that you've got there. But it's worth emphasizing

00:20:32.440 --> 00:20:36.460
that the scientific evidence and certain theories

00:20:36.460 --> 00:20:39.380
beyond that doesn't align with that feeling.

00:20:40.079 --> 00:20:41.980
And perhaps, particularly given the benefits

00:20:41.980 --> 00:20:43.920
of a protein transition, which I hope we'll get

00:20:43.920 --> 00:20:48.640
on to soon, we should adjust our instincts and

00:20:48.640 --> 00:20:53.019
practices as a result. Yeah, let's answer the

00:20:53.019 --> 00:21:00.579
why. Why should we... lead that transition. And

00:21:00.579 --> 00:21:06.500
I guess a way to introduce this question is to

00:21:06.500 --> 00:21:11.779
talk about the ethical aspect of owning cats

00:21:11.779 --> 00:21:17.900
and dogs. Often I've heard, you know, many activists

00:21:17.900 --> 00:21:25.539
advocating for vegans to adopt sheltered cats

00:21:25.539 --> 00:21:32.400
and dogs. And now I'm thinking, you know, is

00:21:32.400 --> 00:21:36.240
it really doing good in the world in the sense

00:21:36.240 --> 00:21:40.980
of is feeding those cats and dogs that we are

00:21:40.980 --> 00:21:45.900
rescuing from shelters, a meat based diet, offsetting

00:21:45.900 --> 00:21:49.940
the good of having rescued them? What do you

00:21:49.940 --> 00:21:53.680
make of that issue? Yeah, look, this is a really

00:21:53.680 --> 00:21:55.259
good question, right? I mean, it's it's known

00:21:55.259 --> 00:21:58.920
in academic circles. A few scholars have termed

00:21:58.920 --> 00:22:02.259
it the vegetarian's dilemma, right? And I remember

00:22:02.259 --> 00:22:03.680
having this, you know, when I said it's changed

00:22:03.680 --> 00:22:06.000
my diet. I remember thinking, well, okay, it's

00:22:06.000 --> 00:22:07.539
all well and good that I might stop eating a

00:22:07.539 --> 00:22:09.789
beef burger. but it looks like I'm feeding a

00:22:09.789 --> 00:22:11.809
lot of these same ingredients to my dog, right?

00:22:13.190 --> 00:22:16.069
So this can definitely be a concern that many

00:22:16.069 --> 00:22:18.630
people have. And the concern, you know, let's

00:22:18.630 --> 00:22:20.589
put the health stuff to one side for now. We

00:22:20.589 --> 00:22:22.230
can come back to health benefits in a bit. We

00:22:22.230 --> 00:22:24.630
can go into more detail on that literature. But

00:22:24.630 --> 00:22:28.049
let's for now look at the ethical and the environmental

00:22:28.049 --> 00:22:30.990
issues with feeding a meat -based diet to your

00:22:30.990 --> 00:22:33.170
dog. They go together, right? The first one is

00:22:33.170 --> 00:22:37.980
to say that A significant proportion of the animals

00:22:37.980 --> 00:22:41.579
that we feed, that we grow for food, it's currently

00:22:41.579 --> 00:22:45.880
reaching about 90, 92 maybe billion land animals

00:22:45.880 --> 00:22:48.619
a year, probably in the hundreds of billions

00:22:48.619 --> 00:22:50.799
or the trillions of aquatic animals on top of

00:22:50.799 --> 00:22:54.180
that. A significant proportion of those are being

00:22:54.180 --> 00:22:57.000
grown for pet food. They're being fed to our

00:22:57.000 --> 00:23:01.119
dogs and cats, right? The numbers on this are...

00:23:00.809 --> 00:23:03.950
when I first saw them, pretty striking and larger

00:23:03.950 --> 00:23:08.670
than I would expect. Globally, 9 % of all land,

00:23:08.950 --> 00:23:12.029
farmed land animals are fed to dogs and cats.

00:23:12.549 --> 00:23:15.529
When you look at wealthy, high -income countries

00:23:15.529 --> 00:23:20.210
that have, you know, high rates of dog and cat

00:23:20.210 --> 00:23:24.410
ownership, that rises to 20%, okay? 20 % of all

00:23:24.410 --> 00:23:26.569
farmed land animals going to pet food. This is

00:23:26.569 --> 00:23:30.339
a significant proportion. It comes with significant

00:23:30.339 --> 00:23:33.599
ethical issues to kill that many animals to feed

00:23:33.599 --> 00:23:35.839
our other animals who we treat as companions

00:23:35.839 --> 00:23:38.359
and it also obviously comes with significant

00:23:38.359 --> 00:23:41.559
environmental issues as well that are attached

00:23:41.559 --> 00:23:45.059
to that because as we know animal -based ingredients

00:23:45.059 --> 00:23:50.700
are very commonly and often extremely the ingredients

00:23:50.700 --> 00:23:54.440
with the worst environmental outcomes. So we

00:23:54.440 --> 00:23:56.579
can delve into this but I think there's a couple

00:23:56.579 --> 00:23:59.829
of key figures that are worth remembering. The

00:23:59.829 --> 00:24:02.109
first, obviously, is that proportion of farmed

00:24:02.109 --> 00:24:03.569
land animals that are going to dogs and cats.

00:24:04.069 --> 00:24:06.630
The second is to say that the literature on this

00:24:06.630 --> 00:24:10.950
has found that in some cases, there's a study

00:24:10.950 --> 00:24:13.710
in Japan, for example, the environmental impacts

00:24:13.710 --> 00:24:16.390
of feeding, say, a medium or large dog, a meat

00:24:16.390 --> 00:24:19.150
-based diet, can outsize the environmental impacts

00:24:19.150 --> 00:24:23.539
of a Japanese person's diets as this study was

00:24:23.539 --> 00:24:26.500
in Japan or even for a large dog a Japanese person's

00:24:26.500 --> 00:24:29.059
entire environmental footprint. It's quite striking

00:24:29.059 --> 00:24:32.259
but makes some sense when you think these are

00:24:32.259 --> 00:24:36.059
particularly unsustainable diets built of a high

00:24:36.059 --> 00:24:40.079
proportion of meat inside the diet. So it's pretty

00:24:40.079 --> 00:24:42.539
clear that there are significant environmental

00:24:42.539 --> 00:24:45.119
and as a result also you could say ethical issues

00:24:45.119 --> 00:24:48.319
with feeding meat -based diets to dogs and cats

00:24:48.319 --> 00:24:51.680
and that's why you know, many people and a growing

00:24:51.680 --> 00:24:54.339
number of people are becoming more interested

00:24:54.339 --> 00:24:57.400
in alternatives that are both more ethical, more

00:24:57.400 --> 00:24:59.720
environmentally friendly, and of course, at the

00:24:59.720 --> 00:25:02.420
same time retaining positive or superior health

00:25:02.420 --> 00:25:06.720
outcomes. And so your answer is, it's complicated.

00:25:09.839 --> 00:25:11.819
Well, look, I mean, it is certainly complicated,

00:25:11.880 --> 00:25:15.059
the impacts are often challenging to calculate

00:25:15.059 --> 00:25:19.119
and varied. But there's a Also relatively simple

00:25:19.119 --> 00:25:22.000
bottom line here, which is to say that dog and

00:25:22.000 --> 00:25:23.819
cat diets as they currently exist, which are

00:25:23.819 --> 00:25:27.579
predominantly meat based, are extremely unsustainable,

00:25:28.140 --> 00:25:32.980
are contributing significant environmental impacts.

00:25:34.000 --> 00:25:37.240
on our planet right now. And also contributing

00:25:37.240 --> 00:25:39.900
significantly to animal farming and animal slaughter,

00:25:39.920 --> 00:25:41.980
which comes with significant ethical implications

00:25:41.980 --> 00:25:43.920
as well. So, you know, certainly when you drill

00:25:43.920 --> 00:25:45.740
into the details, there's a lot of nuance here.

00:25:45.799 --> 00:25:47.799
And, you know, we might get into that. But the

00:25:47.799 --> 00:25:50.440
bottom line is that there are currently significant

00:25:50.440 --> 00:25:53.259
ethical and environmental issues with feeding

00:25:53.259 --> 00:25:57.380
these diets to dogs and cats. Hence the interest

00:25:57.380 --> 00:26:00.480
in alternatives. Yes. And the idea, of course,

00:26:00.519 --> 00:26:04.779
is to feed them a plant based diet to reduce

00:26:04.779 --> 00:26:07.440
the effects of that environmental footprint and

00:26:07.440 --> 00:26:11.400
of course of the impact on the many billions

00:26:11.400 --> 00:26:14.579
of animals out there that are suffering from

00:26:14.579 --> 00:26:17.759
factory farming. Yeah, that's correct. It goes

00:26:17.759 --> 00:26:21.059
beyond that as well. Plant based diets. So by

00:26:21.059 --> 00:26:23.400
this we mean sort of, you know, animal free pet

00:26:23.400 --> 00:26:26.660
food that is Comprised of you know typically

00:26:26.660 --> 00:26:29.500
whole food plant based sources that might be

00:26:29.500 --> 00:26:31.940
anything from beans and pulses to fruits and

00:26:31.940 --> 00:26:35.019
vegetables to algae and things like this. Many

00:26:35.019 --> 00:26:38.380
of the most widely available commercial diets

00:26:38.380 --> 00:26:40.299
at the moment vegan pet food diets for dogs and

00:26:40.299 --> 00:26:42.839
cats. I made of those ingredients but there's

00:26:42.839 --> 00:26:44.700
also some really exciting emerging alternatives

00:26:44.700 --> 00:26:48.759
as well so. Just as in the human case, we have

00:26:48.759 --> 00:26:51.000
various wings of the alternative protein sector

00:26:51.000 --> 00:26:53.920
that includes proteins made from fermentation

00:26:53.920 --> 00:26:56.539
and from cell cultivation, you've got the same

00:26:56.539 --> 00:27:00.559
in the pet food space. So there's a large company

00:27:00.559 --> 00:27:04.000
called Feedkind, I believe, that is now selling

00:27:04.000 --> 00:27:08.039
a commercially available pet food made from a

00:27:08.039 --> 00:27:10.559
precision fermented naturally occurring bacterium.

00:27:10.900 --> 00:27:13.519
So that's also a vegan pet food, but it's made

00:27:13.519 --> 00:27:17.200
by precision fermentation. the environmental

00:27:17.200 --> 00:27:19.720
impacts associated with this sort of food production

00:27:19.720 --> 00:27:22.359
even more greatly diminished compared to plant

00:27:22.359 --> 00:27:24.059
-based because the land use requirements are

00:27:24.059 --> 00:27:26.559
extremely reduced and typically their inputs

00:27:26.559 --> 00:27:30.200
are waste inputs from plant agriculture. And

00:27:30.200 --> 00:27:32.900
then on top of that we've also got a emerging

00:27:32.900 --> 00:27:36.910
cultivated meat pet food space as well. Just

00:27:36.910 --> 00:27:39.490
as in the human case, we've got Singapore, the

00:27:39.490 --> 00:27:41.930
US, and a couple of other places I think that

00:27:41.930 --> 00:27:44.890
are producing cultivated meat for humans to consume

00:27:44.890 --> 00:27:48.490
and can sell it there. There is one company in

00:27:48.490 --> 00:27:51.250
the UK called Meatly that has gained approval

00:27:51.250 --> 00:27:56.880
to sell cultivated meat -based pet food. to dogs

00:27:56.880 --> 00:28:00.539
in the UK and some cultivated meat -based dog

00:28:00.539 --> 00:28:03.519
treats were available for sale in the UK earlier

00:28:03.519 --> 00:28:06.299
this year in a limited supply and there are other

00:28:06.299 --> 00:28:09.119
companies worldwide that are working on cultivated

00:28:09.119 --> 00:28:11.420
meat -based pet food for dogs and cats as well.

00:28:11.700 --> 00:28:15.130
We might not call that animal -free pet food,

00:28:15.190 --> 00:28:17.329
and we might not even call it vegan pet food,

00:28:17.410 --> 00:28:19.910
depending on your definition of these different

00:28:19.910 --> 00:28:22.190
ingredients, but it certainly comes under the

00:28:22.190 --> 00:28:24.529
umbrella of sustainable pet foods in that it

00:28:24.529 --> 00:28:27.269
seeks to address those ethical environmental

00:28:27.269 --> 00:28:29.309
issues associated with conventional meat -based

00:28:29.309 --> 00:28:33.009
pet food. So there we go, there's a few different

00:28:33.009 --> 00:28:36.509
areas of the sector there, but as you say, plant

00:28:36.509 --> 00:28:39.150
-based is the most prolific one at the moment.

00:28:39.950 --> 00:28:43.490
And how do we convince people to make that transition

00:28:43.490 --> 00:28:47.609
to replace the current pet food they have to

00:28:47.609 --> 00:28:52.289
the plant -based alternative? I guess one thing

00:28:52.289 --> 00:28:57.569
I thought about was a video that a natural vegan,

00:28:57.730 --> 00:29:02.009
she's an influencer, recently posted on YouTube

00:29:02.009 --> 00:29:10.700
where she eats. vegan dog pet food and you know

00:29:10.700 --> 00:29:16.059
it's quite weird to see but yeah we do have that

00:29:16.059 --> 00:29:19.000
feeling that the pet food we give to our animals

00:29:19.000 --> 00:29:24.900
is not good for us like we would never you know

00:29:24.900 --> 00:29:28.420
taste it or something like that but we don't

00:29:28.420 --> 00:29:34.019
get the same you know yucky feeling with plant

00:29:34.019 --> 00:29:38.980
-based pet food which is, I guess, could be presented

00:29:38.980 --> 00:29:43.359
as an argument, like, you trust the food, you

00:29:43.359 --> 00:29:47.279
can even taste that food, so why not, you know,

00:29:47.440 --> 00:29:52.799
give it to your pets instead of the meat alternative,

00:29:53.019 --> 00:29:55.380
which, you know, you don't trust, and you would

00:29:55.380 --> 00:29:59.220
never even, you would get on your hand and wash

00:29:59.220 --> 00:30:03.539
it, like, because that's just disgusting. Yeah,

00:30:03.900 --> 00:30:08.460
so was there any research done on this issue?

00:30:08.859 --> 00:30:12.000
Or maybe you have an opinion on that? Yeah, that's

00:30:12.000 --> 00:30:15.759
funny. Yeah. So as I said earlier, I'm a I used

00:30:15.759 --> 00:30:18.079
to be a founders associate at Omni, which is

00:30:18.079 --> 00:30:20.000
one of the leading vegan pet food companies in

00:30:20.000 --> 00:30:23.079
the UK. And I sold a lot of pet food while I

00:30:23.079 --> 00:30:25.380
was there often in person at markets and so on.

00:30:25.500 --> 00:30:28.440
And I developed a sort of habit of eating a piece

00:30:28.440 --> 00:30:31.609
of kibble. if someone was concerned about the

00:30:31.609 --> 00:30:33.170
ingredients or the quality and I'd say, look,

00:30:33.190 --> 00:30:35.490
it's delicious. Even I eat it. You know, I snack

00:30:35.490 --> 00:30:37.809
on it in my spare time. So yeah, that can convince

00:30:37.809 --> 00:30:39.630
for some people it's quite a fun sort of party

00:30:39.630 --> 00:30:41.750
trick to do. As you say, you wouldn't do it with

00:30:41.750 --> 00:30:43.390
some of the ingredients in meat based pet foods.

00:30:43.390 --> 00:30:45.950
And in the same way that some people say that

00:30:45.950 --> 00:30:49.109
meat feels natural for pets, often vegan pet

00:30:49.109 --> 00:30:51.109
food feels much cleaner for pets, much, much

00:30:51.109 --> 00:30:53.670
cleaner than the often poor quality animal ingredients

00:30:53.670 --> 00:30:55.650
that go into conventional meat based pet food.

00:30:56.130 --> 00:30:58.450
But to this question of you know, how can we

00:30:58.450 --> 00:31:00.329
convince people, you know, look, it's very similar

00:31:00.329 --> 00:31:01.690
to the human case, it's going to be different

00:31:01.690 --> 00:31:04.589
arguments for different people. And it sort of

00:31:04.589 --> 00:31:06.990
depends, you know, how you want to convince someone

00:31:06.990 --> 00:31:09.549
and what someone's priorities are. We're fortunate

00:31:09.549 --> 00:31:12.349
that as things stand, as the evidence shows us

00:31:12.349 --> 00:31:15.329
at the moment, there are, you know, a variety

00:31:15.329 --> 00:31:17.930
of very compelling reasons to transition these

00:31:17.930 --> 00:31:20.269
animals. And so often is a case of, you know,

00:31:20.390 --> 00:31:22.009
pick your pick the argument you most prefer.

00:31:22.190 --> 00:31:25.480
It's worth saying that at the moment, uh the

00:31:25.480 --> 00:31:28.400
percentage of guardians feeding vegan pet foods

00:31:28.400 --> 00:31:31.539
there dogs and cats are is pretty limited right

00:31:31.539 --> 00:31:33.700
it's probably about two percent for dogs in the

00:31:33.700 --> 00:31:36.319
uk it's pretty much zero percent at the moment

00:31:36.319 --> 00:31:38.220
for cats there's certainly some but it's you

00:31:38.220 --> 00:31:42.000
know uh not not a not a significant number right

00:31:42.000 --> 00:31:46.309
however consumer survey studies that have been

00:31:46.309 --> 00:31:47.730
conducted, there's a couple in the literature

00:31:47.730 --> 00:31:52.450
now, show that between 35 to 46 percent of guardians

00:31:52.450 --> 00:31:56.440
are open to transitioning to alternatives. if

00:31:56.440 --> 00:31:58.059
they were given the right information and their

00:31:58.059 --> 00:32:00.680
concerns were satisfied. So there's clearly a

00:32:00.680 --> 00:32:02.619
huge opportunity here. And it suggests, as you

00:32:02.619 --> 00:32:04.319
say, that there's some convincing that needs

00:32:04.319 --> 00:32:07.619
to be done. The research, I think, and perhaps

00:32:07.619 --> 00:32:09.900
you're coming around to this as well, seems strong

00:32:09.900 --> 00:32:12.420
so far, particularly for dogs. We might talk

00:32:12.420 --> 00:32:14.640
about the research for dogs in a bit and growing

00:32:14.640 --> 00:32:17.460
for cats. And so we should certainly think about

00:32:17.460 --> 00:32:20.359
this transition. For many people, the arguments

00:32:20.359 --> 00:32:23.220
will be environmental. And that's one that can

00:32:23.220 --> 00:32:27.440
be quite strong. simply saying that the footprint

00:32:27.440 --> 00:32:29.700
associated with your dog's diet, in particular,

00:32:30.119 --> 00:32:32.460
is going to rival your own in some cases that,

00:32:32.680 --> 00:32:34.200
as I said, you know, in a high income country,

00:32:34.339 --> 00:32:37.759
the UK 20 % of all farmed land animals are going

00:32:37.759 --> 00:32:41.099
to pet food is often quite compelling. There's

00:32:41.099 --> 00:32:43.700
a few different statistics there that can motivate

00:32:43.700 --> 00:32:46.539
a transition. But there's also some really strong

00:32:46.539 --> 00:32:48.200
health based arguments. And actually, the companies

00:32:48.200 --> 00:32:49.700
you see that are really flying at the moment,

00:32:49.799 --> 00:32:54.519
one of which is Omni in the UK, stick relatively

00:32:54.519 --> 00:32:56.619
exclusively to these health based arguments because

00:32:56.619 --> 00:32:58.599
they're really strong. These arguments tend to

00:32:58.599 --> 00:33:01.819
say, particularly for dogs, because Omni is a

00:33:01.819 --> 00:33:05.240
dog food company, it didn't say, look, some of

00:33:05.240 --> 00:33:09.579
the ingredients that the pet food industry are

00:33:09.579 --> 00:33:11.279
relying on at the moment and have historically

00:33:11.279 --> 00:33:15.400
relied on are connected to animal agriculture,

00:33:15.700 --> 00:33:17.500
right? These are essentially chicken and beef

00:33:17.500 --> 00:33:20.480
are really common ones in pet food. They also

00:33:20.480 --> 00:33:23.309
happen to be some of the most common allergens

00:33:23.309 --> 00:33:26.309
for dogs in pet food, right? Chicken and beef

00:33:26.309 --> 00:33:28.829
are not really the ideal protein sources for

00:33:28.829 --> 00:33:31.089
these animals and we feed them I think largely

00:33:31.089 --> 00:33:33.769
because they're so available, right? We kill

00:33:33.769 --> 00:33:37.420
so many chickens and so many cows. that it's

00:33:37.420 --> 00:33:39.559
very available to also feed this stuff to our

00:33:39.559 --> 00:33:41.539
dogs and cats, particularly say the byproducts

00:33:41.539 --> 00:33:45.299
that humans don't want to eat. But these typically

00:33:45.299 --> 00:33:47.619
are sources of allergens that will result in

00:33:47.619 --> 00:33:50.660
various health issues. Obesity is a big one.

00:33:51.140 --> 00:33:54.160
So 50 % roughly of dogs and cats now in the UK

00:33:54.160 --> 00:33:57.339
are obese and that's a rising challenge for veterinarians

00:33:57.339 --> 00:33:59.380
that comes with various... you know, subsequent

00:33:59.380 --> 00:34:02.859
health issues. Guts issues tend to be a good

00:34:02.859 --> 00:34:05.240
problem with this. Skin issues as well as the

00:34:05.240 --> 00:34:07.339
other thing I'll typically hear guardians talk

00:34:07.339 --> 00:34:10.699
about. And the research shows, and this is particularly

00:34:10.699 --> 00:34:12.400
strong in dogs, I said that there were three

00:34:12.400 --> 00:34:15.699
studies showing positive health outcomes for

00:34:15.699 --> 00:34:19.719
cats, for cats fed vegan diets. There's now I

00:34:19.719 --> 00:34:23.059
think 12 studies for dogs showing this. Out of

00:34:23.059 --> 00:34:26.400
a literature about 13 studies, 12 roughly, are

00:34:26.400 --> 00:34:29.369
showing you know, superior equivalent health

00:34:29.369 --> 00:34:31.929
outcomes for dogs on vegan diets. And typically

00:34:31.929 --> 00:34:36.050
what you see is a reduction in these health indicators

00:34:36.050 --> 00:34:38.190
that are linked to, you know, allergens prompted

00:34:38.190 --> 00:34:39.969
by chicken and beef. So these are things like,

00:34:39.969 --> 00:34:42.690
you know, gut and digestive issues, skin issues,

00:34:42.789 --> 00:34:45.369
things like that. And actually, that's something

00:34:45.369 --> 00:34:47.289
that can be really compelling for guardians to

00:34:47.289 --> 00:34:48.710
hear that actually the food that they're feeding

00:34:48.710 --> 00:34:50.769
may not be prompting the best health outcomes

00:34:50.769 --> 00:34:54.969
as it stands. And transitioning to a cleaner

00:34:54.969 --> 00:34:58.360
alternative that you know as a bonus has some

00:34:58.360 --> 00:35:01.659
environmental positives will be better for your

00:35:01.659 --> 00:35:04.179
dog or cats and you know best for your wallet

00:35:04.179 --> 00:35:06.239
overall you could also say excluding certain

00:35:06.239 --> 00:35:08.980
vet bills and best of your peace of mind because

00:35:08.980 --> 00:35:12.159
you know we should recognize that dogs and cats

00:35:12.159 --> 00:35:14.980
are now seen as part of the family we love these

00:35:14.980 --> 00:35:17.840
animals very much i know i love my dog and and

00:35:17.840 --> 00:35:19.579
you know the dogs i've had in my life very much

00:35:19.579 --> 00:35:21.480
and we want what's best for them we want the

00:35:21.480 --> 00:35:24.489
best health outcomes out there So these are the

00:35:24.489 --> 00:35:27.130
sort of arguments that we can use to motivate

00:35:27.130 --> 00:35:29.869
a transition. And we're seeing from the success

00:35:29.869 --> 00:35:33.349
of various companies like Omni and others that

00:35:33.349 --> 00:35:36.070
this is being effective in facilitating a transition.

00:35:37.449 --> 00:35:41.349
I feel like we should focus on the fact that

00:35:41.349 --> 00:35:45.190
animal products have traces of antibiotics in

00:35:45.190 --> 00:35:49.690
them, of excrements of mercury, and the list

00:35:49.690 --> 00:35:54.980
goes on. why are we getting into the, you know,

00:35:55.500 --> 00:35:58.199
nutrition talk, which is, you know, usually,

00:35:58.820 --> 00:36:02.460
you know, you can make the case this way or that

00:36:02.460 --> 00:36:05.699
way, it's, it's all, you know, scientific terms

00:36:05.699 --> 00:36:09.179
for people, they just don't, it's not very easy

00:36:09.179 --> 00:36:13.960
to grasp. And, you know, it's easy to interpret

00:36:13.960 --> 00:36:16.280
it that this way or that way. But if you talk

00:36:16.280 --> 00:36:20.969
about excrements and mercury, I, you know, case,

00:36:21.210 --> 00:36:23.750
you know, you're doing a great case for for your

00:36:23.750 --> 00:36:28.610
product. Do you have an opinion on that? Yeah,

00:36:28.670 --> 00:36:31.030
look, I think you've, you know, raised a few

00:36:31.030 --> 00:36:34.090
more good reasons to transition dogs away from

00:36:34.090 --> 00:36:36.710
these diets, you know, that the list essentially

00:36:36.710 --> 00:36:41.210
goes on. You know, I would say that I found that

00:36:41.210 --> 00:36:44.070
many, you know, guardians of dogs and cats are

00:36:44.139 --> 00:36:47.440
quite clued up in the health literature, or at

00:36:47.440 --> 00:36:50.599
least the health impacts of their dogs and cats.

00:36:50.780 --> 00:36:52.940
They care about this deeply. They'll often read

00:36:52.940 --> 00:36:54.719
up online. They'll often speak to their veterinarians.

00:36:55.139 --> 00:36:58.260
So I think that is a really ripe discourse that

00:36:58.260 --> 00:37:01.519
we can tap into and many guardians will meet

00:37:01.519 --> 00:37:04.860
us there. But as you say, there are many others

00:37:04.860 --> 00:37:08.550
to go through as well. Animal processing is in

00:37:08.550 --> 00:37:11.769
many ways a nightmare and there are issues not

00:37:11.769 --> 00:37:15.929
only for the health of the animals The companion

00:37:15.929 --> 00:37:17.869
animals I should say that when it comes to things

00:37:17.869 --> 00:37:20.250
like mercury excrement, you know residual antibiotics

00:37:20.250 --> 00:37:23.210
coming through But also, you know, let's stick

00:37:23.210 --> 00:37:25.010
with that antibiotic point public health issues

00:37:25.010 --> 00:37:26.570
that come with that as well You know the antibiotic

00:37:26.570 --> 00:37:30.010
use in general is a serious public health concern.

00:37:30.170 --> 00:37:32.510
I believe the majority of all antibiotics that

00:37:32.510 --> 00:37:35.940
we feed are fed to farmed animals, it's certainly

00:37:35.940 --> 00:37:39.039
a significant proportion. And so there's a public

00:37:39.039 --> 00:37:41.280
health angle there as well that actually comes

00:37:41.280 --> 00:37:44.559
back to humans. So yeah, look, you know, there's,

00:37:44.559 --> 00:37:47.760
there's various reasons to be concerned with

00:37:47.760 --> 00:37:50.019
the status quo when it comes to these diets and

00:37:50.019 --> 00:37:52.780
various reasons to strive for superior alternatives.

00:37:54.360 --> 00:37:56.280
Yeah, it's just, you know, personal feeling,

00:37:56.380 --> 00:38:00.559
I feel frustrated when, you know, vegans or vegan

00:38:00.559 --> 00:38:04.300
advocates get into the, you know, science of

00:38:04.300 --> 00:38:10.159
nutrition talk and talk about B12, B6, B this

00:38:10.159 --> 00:38:15.079
and that. You know that the other side can just

00:38:15.079 --> 00:38:19.139
point to other studies and make the same kind

00:38:19.139 --> 00:38:24.039
of sciencey arguments. It's just endless conversation

00:38:24.039 --> 00:38:28.920
when we have those bigger, stronger arguments

00:38:28.920 --> 00:38:32.659
in the presence of, again, antibiotics, mercury,

00:38:32.699 --> 00:38:38.070
and so on. So yeah, I just feel it's a missed

00:38:38.070 --> 00:38:42.989
opportunity. Do you think that feeding more and

00:38:42.989 --> 00:38:49.090
more pets a vegan diet will influence the diet

00:38:49.090 --> 00:38:52.449
of their owners, of their guardians? Do you think

00:38:52.449 --> 00:38:55.969
it will have an effect in veganizing the general

00:38:55.969 --> 00:39:00.360
public? Great question. see something in the

00:39:00.360 --> 00:39:02.000
back of my mind says i've read something academic

00:39:02.000 --> 00:39:03.860
on this but it's not coming to mind so i'll have

00:39:03.860 --> 00:39:06.159
to give you anecdotal evidence instead as i said

00:39:06.159 --> 00:39:09.250
look i've i've sold a lot of pet food in my time

00:39:09.250 --> 00:39:12.389
and you know i've spoken probably to hundreds

00:39:12.389 --> 00:39:15.409
if not thousands thousands of guardians and every

00:39:15.409 --> 00:39:18.309
now and again i do meet a vegan guardian who

00:39:18.309 --> 00:39:20.449
says oh well i wasn't vegan until my dog turned

00:39:20.449 --> 00:39:22.190
vegan you know my dog turned vegan for some health

00:39:22.190 --> 00:39:24.170
based reason you know the vet asked them to be

00:39:24.170 --> 00:39:27.070
put on a hypoallergenic diet or you know i was

00:39:27.070 --> 00:39:28.769
concerned with the environmental impact and so

00:39:28.769 --> 00:39:32.329
on and after that they became more open to the

00:39:32.329 --> 00:39:34.670
use of vegan diet on themselves, you know, vegan,

00:39:34.670 --> 00:39:36.650
vegan ingredients, plant based ingredients. And

00:39:36.650 --> 00:39:37.929
so I think it's certainly possible. And I think

00:39:37.929 --> 00:39:40.349
it's a it'll be an interesting avenue to explore.

00:39:41.889 --> 00:39:44.849
But I think that could be a positive case from

00:39:44.849 --> 00:39:46.730
an advocacy point of view. And we might see some

00:39:46.730 --> 00:39:48.530
beneficial spillover effects there for sure.

00:39:49.269 --> 00:39:54.289
A few words about the I guess the words we use

00:39:54.289 --> 00:39:58.849
the terms to describe, you know, pets, you use

00:39:58.849 --> 00:40:02.409
the word guardian instead of owner. Do you feel

00:40:02.409 --> 00:40:06.849
it makes a difference to use that kind of vocabulary

00:40:06.849 --> 00:40:15.869
to talk about pets, companion animals? Great

00:40:15.869 --> 00:40:17.829
question. I mean, look, this is a question we

00:40:17.829 --> 00:40:20.329
grapple with in various different fields, I guess

00:40:20.329 --> 00:40:23.469
you could say, as we learn to dismantle some

00:40:23.469 --> 00:40:25.289
of the systems of oppression around us, right?

00:40:25.550 --> 00:40:28.849
There's language when it comes to feminism, when

00:40:28.849 --> 00:40:31.750
it comes to racism, when it comes to sexuality

00:40:31.750 --> 00:40:36.269
and gender that various people encourage us to

00:40:36.269 --> 00:40:38.969
change in order to be more inclusive and more

00:40:38.969 --> 00:40:43.510
respectful to others. It's really difficult because

00:40:43.510 --> 00:40:47.369
changing language is a complex thing that is

00:40:47.369 --> 00:40:50.809
never going to be done all in one go with complete

00:40:50.809 --> 00:40:54.650
agreement from everyone. But I am relatively

00:40:54.650 --> 00:40:57.329
convinced that we should be using language that

00:40:57.329 --> 00:41:01.150
is inclusive and also aligns with our ethical

00:41:01.150 --> 00:41:05.050
views right so in this case why do i say companion

00:41:05.050 --> 00:41:07.130
animals instead of pets and why do i say guardians

00:41:07.130 --> 00:41:09.730
of owners because the connotations around pets

00:41:09.730 --> 00:41:12.289
and owner is there's an inferiority inferior

00:41:12.289 --> 00:41:15.250
and superior element to it and also particularly

00:41:15.250 --> 00:41:16.989
the owner there's a sense of ownership right

00:41:16.989 --> 00:41:19.989
um and it's it's my sense that we shouldn't own

00:41:19.989 --> 00:41:22.869
animals as commodities but rather care for and

00:41:22.869 --> 00:41:25.130
respect them as living beings so in that sense

00:41:25.130 --> 00:41:28.639
i think there's you know a good case to change

00:41:28.639 --> 00:41:31.659
our language in that respect. I guess a caveat

00:41:31.659 --> 00:41:34.760
to that is that changing language is generally

00:41:34.760 --> 00:41:38.320
messy. And I probably wouldn't expect anyone

00:41:38.320 --> 00:41:41.579
to only say companion animal and only say guardian.

00:41:41.860 --> 00:41:44.059
And indeed, I often say pet owner, you know,

00:41:44.199 --> 00:41:46.960
pet and owner as well, depending on the context

00:41:46.960 --> 00:41:49.599
and depending on, you know, what happens to come

00:41:49.599 --> 00:41:53.739
out of my mouth. But I do think it is helpful

00:41:53.739 --> 00:41:55.880
generally speaking, perhaps depending on your

00:41:55.880 --> 00:41:58.800
audience, but generally speaking. to use language

00:41:58.800 --> 00:42:01.679
that aligns with our sort of, you know, ethical

00:42:01.679 --> 00:42:05.260
frameworks and our desire to keep spaces inclusive,

00:42:05.880 --> 00:42:08.139
because language does make a difference to how

00:42:08.139 --> 00:42:10.199
we think about the world, conceive the world

00:42:10.199 --> 00:42:15.360
around us. I think we should do what we can to

00:42:15.360 --> 00:42:18.860
use language to promote the future that we want

00:42:18.860 --> 00:42:21.860
to see. Yeah, there are so many perspectives

00:42:21.860 --> 00:42:26.500
on on this question. Anne Heritage, again, the

00:42:26.500 --> 00:42:31.000
owner of Brembles, I asked her the same question.

00:42:31.880 --> 00:42:36.300
She said, she responded, we should, you know,

00:42:36.699 --> 00:42:39.960
expose the reality, the violent reality of this

00:42:39.960 --> 00:42:43.639
system. And so, yeah, we should be talking about

00:42:43.639 --> 00:42:48.980
owners and pets and so on. I don't know if you

00:42:48.980 --> 00:42:53.750
ever read Matthew Scully, but he talks about

00:42:53.750 --> 00:42:56.809
re appropriating, you know, that language and

00:42:56.809 --> 00:43:01.789
the fact that pet was endearing to him. So yeah,

00:43:01.929 --> 00:43:05.030
so many perspectives. Yeah, really interesting.

00:43:05.170 --> 00:43:06.889
I mean, it's a it's a constant debate, right?

00:43:07.489 --> 00:43:10.489
And it's never going to be easy. But I think

00:43:10.489 --> 00:43:14.619
there is Certainly things we can do to make a

00:43:14.619 --> 00:43:16.719
difference here. And, you know, that's typically

00:43:16.719 --> 00:43:19.119
why I use these words, you know, generally speaking

00:43:19.119 --> 00:43:22.159
when I can. So long as it doesn't become the

00:43:22.159 --> 00:43:25.679
hill we die on, I think. I think there's still

00:43:25.679 --> 00:43:28.659
space to, you know, allow for individual preference

00:43:28.659 --> 00:43:31.139
and allow for mistakes, you know, and also to

00:43:31.139 --> 00:43:33.019
allow for certain language be used in certain

00:43:33.019 --> 00:43:35.199
spaces. If you're in a more conservative space

00:43:35.199 --> 00:43:38.940
where, you know, saying guardian instead of owner

00:43:38.940 --> 00:43:41.079
is going to really switch off a room. you know,

00:43:41.079 --> 00:43:43.639
maybe it's best to say owner in that context.

00:43:44.300 --> 00:43:47.179
But yeah, generally speaking, I'm with you on

00:43:47.179 --> 00:43:50.579
using the language we want to use when possible.

00:43:51.940 --> 00:43:56.519
You mentioned a few companies that are developing

00:43:56.519 --> 00:44:00.300
and you worked for one that are developing pet

00:44:00.300 --> 00:44:07.440
food. Is this lucrative? Are they going to, you

00:44:07.440 --> 00:44:14.539
know, become bankrupt in the near future. What

00:44:14.539 --> 00:44:18.420
is the state of this new plant based pet food

00:44:18.420 --> 00:44:22.599
economy? Good question. Yeah. Yeah, look, it

00:44:22.599 --> 00:44:26.289
is lucrative. There's one statistic I can give

00:44:26.289 --> 00:44:28.809
you that speaks to that. The vegan pet food market

00:44:28.809 --> 00:44:31.150
is growing at a faster rate than the pet food

00:44:31.150 --> 00:44:34.610
market overall, right? So it's about 4 .6 % compound

00:44:34.610 --> 00:44:36.510
annual growth rate for the pet food market as

00:44:36.510 --> 00:44:39.889
a whole. Vegan pet food is about 7 to 9 % CAGR.

00:44:40.250 --> 00:44:43.809
So we're seeing there that there's a... particular

00:44:43.809 --> 00:44:46.849
growth of this category at the moment. And that

00:44:46.849 --> 00:44:49.989
is, you know, most likely motivated by the concerns

00:44:49.989 --> 00:44:52.030
we've been talking about the interest in alternatives.

00:44:53.190 --> 00:44:54.769
So that's one thing to say the second thing to

00:44:54.769 --> 00:44:56.510
say and I can talk about Omni because it's one

00:44:56.510 --> 00:44:58.550
of the companies I know best. There are others

00:44:58.550 --> 00:45:03.250
that will also be doing well. But the growth

00:45:03.250 --> 00:45:05.409
rate of these companies is very impressive. And

00:45:05.409 --> 00:45:07.769
certainly Omni is now at a point where it's receiving

00:45:08.940 --> 00:45:11.059
relatively mainstream appeal it was on dragons

00:45:11.059 --> 00:45:14.920
den which is the uh us equivalent of shark tank

00:45:14.920 --> 00:45:18.099
um you know going in front of five celebrity

00:45:18.099 --> 00:45:20.139
investors and securing investment from two of

00:45:20.139 --> 00:45:24.349
them um and a lot of these companies are growing

00:45:24.349 --> 00:45:26.769
very quickly and achieving incredible things.

00:45:27.050 --> 00:45:28.789
Another company, The Pack, along with Meatly,

00:45:28.889 --> 00:45:31.829
as I said, were able to develop the world's first

00:45:31.829 --> 00:45:36.570
cultivated meat -based pet treats ever and feed

00:45:36.570 --> 00:45:38.750
it to dogs in the UK. These are really impressive

00:45:38.750 --> 00:45:40.230
achievements and it's happening at breakneck

00:45:40.230 --> 00:45:44.429
speed. So this is an active and rapidly growing

00:45:44.429 --> 00:45:48.150
industry that we should, I think, do our best

00:45:48.150 --> 00:45:51.840
to support as it as it real realizes the benefits

00:45:51.840 --> 00:45:56.960
that it's seeking to realize. It's funny. It's

00:45:56.960 --> 00:45:59.420
so it's called shark tank is called dragon stand

00:45:59.420 --> 00:46:05.559
in the UK. Right. The Canada version of that

00:46:05.559 --> 00:46:11.380
is also called shark tanks. But the Quebec version,

00:46:11.679 --> 00:46:17.880
which is French Canada is called So it's like

00:46:17.880 --> 00:46:22.840
the literal translation of the UK one. Funny.

00:46:24.940 --> 00:46:27.820
Yeah, that's interesting. Scary animal is basically

00:46:27.820 --> 00:46:30.300
the vibe, right? The place where the scary animals

00:46:30.300 --> 00:46:33.300
are, it's interesting. But yeah, I guess you

00:46:33.300 --> 00:46:36.380
guys are bridging the Europeans or at least the

00:46:36.380 --> 00:46:40.000
UK from the North Americans there. Yeah, I wonder

00:46:40.000 --> 00:46:45.789
why they made that choice. If we want to invest

00:46:45.789 --> 00:46:50.489
in those companies, how do we do so? Yeah, good

00:46:50.489 --> 00:46:55.050
question. So I have been aware of some companies

00:46:55.050 --> 00:46:57.289
that have offered public shares through Cedars

00:46:57.289 --> 00:46:59.190
and platforms like this. I'm not aware of any

00:46:59.190 --> 00:47:03.159
that are available at the moment. These companies

00:47:03.159 --> 00:47:04.820
may go public at some point, but I don't know

00:47:04.820 --> 00:47:06.800
when and I wouldn't expect it to be immediately.

00:47:07.079 --> 00:47:08.800
So, you know, feel free to have a look online.

00:47:08.880 --> 00:47:10.840
There'll be lists of vegan pet food companies

00:47:10.840 --> 00:47:13.679
as a incomplete but still useful list on one

00:47:13.679 --> 00:47:16.360
of the websites in the show notes that I'll provide

00:47:16.360 --> 00:47:19.260
to you sustainablepetfood .info. So you can have

00:47:19.260 --> 00:47:21.340
a look there and see if any are accepting investment.

00:47:21.739 --> 00:47:24.539
However, if you are an ordinary person and not

00:47:24.539 --> 00:47:26.960
an investor with, you know, piles of money to

00:47:26.960 --> 00:47:29.320
spare, there's two ways I think that you could

00:47:29.320 --> 00:47:34.059
really financially support this transition. One

00:47:34.059 --> 00:47:35.739
is if you've got a dog or cat, you could buy

00:47:35.739 --> 00:47:38.059
them vegan pet food, right? You're gonna be realizing

00:47:38.059 --> 00:47:40.480
some benefits there with regards to your pet's

00:47:40.480 --> 00:47:42.679
health and with regards to the environment and

00:47:42.679 --> 00:47:45.019
the ethical impact there as well. But the other

00:47:45.019 --> 00:47:48.960
thing you can do is donate to animal charities.

00:47:49.880 --> 00:47:51.980
So I expect most of your listeners will be familiar

00:47:51.980 --> 00:47:53.960
with these, but there's various charities that

00:47:53.960 --> 00:47:57.239
will, meta charities that will collect funds

00:47:57.239 --> 00:47:59.900
for those who are seeking to drive positive good

00:47:59.900 --> 00:48:02.300
for animals and then distribute those, the animal

00:48:02.300 --> 00:48:05.079
movement, animal charity evaluators is one, open

00:48:05.079 --> 00:48:07.239
philanthropy I believe has an animal branch,

00:48:08.780 --> 00:48:11.059
and farm kind is another great one that's focused

00:48:11.059 --> 00:48:14.599
specifically on animals. have a look at those

00:48:14.599 --> 00:48:17.099
organizations. And if you want to donate that

00:48:17.099 --> 00:48:21.039
is effectively a way of investing in the pet

00:48:21.039 --> 00:48:23.920
food protein transition, among other excellent

00:48:23.920 --> 00:48:25.960
campaigns that are aimed at helping animals.

00:48:26.519 --> 00:48:28.820
So that can be one thing that I'd recommend if

00:48:28.820 --> 00:48:30.860
you're interested in supporting financially.

00:48:31.820 --> 00:48:38.320
And I guess lastly, why did you decide to, you

00:48:38.320 --> 00:48:43.590
know, focus your work on this area of the fight

00:48:43.590 --> 00:48:48.070
for animal rights? Yeah, good question. Two reasons

00:48:48.070 --> 00:48:50.369
really, or two categories of reason. One is the

00:48:50.369 --> 00:48:53.429
sort of maybe the intellectual sort of more businessy

00:48:53.429 --> 00:48:55.489
side of things. And the other is the emotional

00:48:55.489 --> 00:48:58.210
one, right? The intellectual one was to say,

00:48:58.230 --> 00:49:01.030
I've been interested in effective altruism for

00:49:01.030 --> 00:49:03.550
a few years. So I was interested in what can

00:49:03.550 --> 00:49:06.349
I do that is important neglected and tractable,

00:49:06.510 --> 00:49:09.489
how can I do the most good? That led me quite

00:49:09.489 --> 00:49:11.070
quickly to the animal movement, which I felt

00:49:11.070 --> 00:49:13.489
was incredibly neglected, incredibly important,

00:49:13.590 --> 00:49:17.530
and I hope very tractable. And so quite quickly,

00:49:17.610 --> 00:49:19.489
I started working on movement and found that

00:49:19.489 --> 00:49:22.469
very inspiring and invigorating. And from there,

00:49:22.469 --> 00:49:24.230
I sort of looked further still and thought, okay,

00:49:24.230 --> 00:49:25.869
I'm a young person, I've got my career ahead

00:49:25.869 --> 00:49:28.469
of me, where do I start here? It looks like there's,

00:49:28.469 --> 00:49:31.340
you know, a lot of sort of a lot of opportunities

00:49:31.340 --> 00:49:33.280
that are right for the taking, but where would

00:49:33.280 --> 00:49:36.139
be best? Where can I go? And within the animal

00:49:36.139 --> 00:49:38.900
movement, I think the pet food protein transition

00:49:38.900 --> 00:49:41.300
is a particularly important, particularly neglected

00:49:41.300 --> 00:49:43.940
and particularly tractable sub -cause area, if

00:49:43.940 --> 00:49:46.099
you like, particularly important because, as

00:49:46.099 --> 00:49:48.820
I've said, you've got about, you know, nine to

00:49:48.820 --> 00:49:52.119
20 % of global farmed animals, farmed land animals

00:49:52.119 --> 00:49:54.519
and, you know, many more aquatic animals as well

00:49:54.519 --> 00:49:57.750
who are being farmed for pet foods. you know,

00:49:57.750 --> 00:50:00.050
if we were to transition away from meat based

00:50:00.050 --> 00:50:02.949
diets, we'd be saving about 6 billion land animals

00:50:02.949 --> 00:50:05.670
globally from slaughter. So there's an importance

00:50:05.670 --> 00:50:09.150
there in the numbers. There's a neglectedness

00:50:09.150 --> 00:50:11.710
in the sense that despite this occupying a pretty

00:50:11.710 --> 00:50:15.329
significant proportion of, you know, animal consumption,

00:50:16.230 --> 00:50:17.869
there are hard, there's hardly anyone in the

00:50:17.869 --> 00:50:19.389
animal community working on this. You know, I

00:50:19.389 --> 00:50:23.010
know there's a podcast that your audience is

00:50:23.010 --> 00:50:26.150
a sort of animal advocacy audience. So really,

00:50:26.630 --> 00:50:29.860
may I address you all directly when I say this

00:50:29.860 --> 00:50:31.760
is severely neglected, and at the moment we've

00:50:31.760 --> 00:50:35.219
got quite a large chunk of animal consumption

00:50:35.219 --> 00:50:38.239
being focused on with really just a few people

00:50:38.239 --> 00:50:40.420
in the movement. I'm one, Professor Andrew Knight

00:50:40.420 --> 00:50:43.940
is another, and there's a few others doing excellent

00:50:43.940 --> 00:50:47.139
work as well, but it's really not many given

00:50:47.139 --> 00:50:50.960
the importance of this field. and then on top

00:50:50.960 --> 00:50:52.760
of that I see this is particularly tractable

00:50:52.760 --> 00:50:55.719
you know dietary change in the human space is

00:50:55.719 --> 00:50:58.179
you know worth fighting for but certainly challenging

00:50:58.179 --> 00:51:00.639
and we're learning that as we go dietary change

00:51:00.639 --> 00:51:04.340
in the pet space is is under explored and potentially

00:51:04.340 --> 00:51:06.380
even more tractable than the human case you know

00:51:06.380 --> 00:51:09.719
I see certain elements of that such as you know

00:51:09.719 --> 00:51:12.869
when you transition a dog or a cat it's typically

00:51:12.869 --> 00:51:14.670
not the case that they'll just suddenly one day

00:51:14.670 --> 00:51:16.070
decide that they don't like it anymore and they'll

00:51:16.070 --> 00:51:17.690
go something else. You can often feed that food

00:51:17.690 --> 00:51:20.610
pretty much forever so long as the guardian is

00:51:20.610 --> 00:51:24.269
motivated to rebuy. There's some elements here

00:51:24.269 --> 00:51:26.170
to say that this is really tractable health elements

00:51:26.170 --> 00:51:31.409
as well. So from that sense, that drew me to

00:51:31.409 --> 00:51:34.219
work on pet food and I've been working on the

00:51:34.219 --> 00:51:36.380
business side of things for a bit, but now focusing

00:51:36.380 --> 00:51:39.460
on research for the last sort of, you know, one,

00:51:39.460 --> 00:51:42.480
one and a half, two and a half years now. The

00:51:42.480 --> 00:51:44.480
emotional argument is much simpler. The emotional

00:51:44.480 --> 00:51:47.840
reason, you know, I love dogs, dogs and cats,

00:51:48.019 --> 00:51:51.440
I love animals. It's a pleasure to spend my day

00:51:51.440 --> 00:51:53.980
thinking about them and often meeting them if

00:51:53.980 --> 00:51:57.300
I'm selling pet food. And yeah, I really enjoy

00:51:57.300 --> 00:51:59.159
that. And so it was great to be able to focus

00:51:59.159 --> 00:52:03.530
on. sort of an air of this movement that I love

00:52:03.530 --> 00:52:07.690
as well. So that's been lovely too. And is it

00:52:07.690 --> 00:52:13.329
smooth sailing? Or are you meeting like opposition

00:52:13.329 --> 00:52:17.590
from the animal industry? From sort of animal

00:52:17.590 --> 00:52:21.170
agriculture industries, do you mean? Yes, I'm

00:52:21.170 --> 00:52:26.070
thinking for instance, about advertisements against

00:52:26.070 --> 00:52:30.929
plant based meat alternatives. Is there a version

00:52:30.929 --> 00:52:35.969
of that for plant based pet food? Yeah, look,

00:52:36.050 --> 00:52:38.329
you know, I've heard less of it from an advertising

00:52:38.329 --> 00:52:41.550
perspective. I expect it exists to an extent.

00:52:42.309 --> 00:52:46.260
I'm aware of I'm aware of cases of animal industries

00:52:46.260 --> 00:52:49.539
being concerned and trying to prevent the growth

00:52:49.539 --> 00:52:52.480
of this movement and the growth of the research,

00:52:52.519 --> 00:52:56.059
so that can exist to an extent. However, it's

00:52:56.059 --> 00:52:57.860
also worth saying, and this is similar to the

00:52:57.860 --> 00:53:02.280
human case, often meat -based companies and animal

00:53:02.280 --> 00:53:04.159
industries see this as an opportunity as well.

00:53:04.539 --> 00:53:08.400
So, Mars, one of the biggest pet food conglomerates

00:53:08.400 --> 00:53:11.809
in the world, do invest in some vegan pet food

00:53:11.809 --> 00:53:14.429
companies, and that's not really a surprise.

00:53:14.449 --> 00:53:18.050
They see it as a fast growing category. And while

00:53:18.050 --> 00:53:20.929
there is some advertisement moving against vegan,

00:53:21.070 --> 00:53:22.949
it's typically just from individual meat based

00:53:22.949 --> 00:53:24.969
companies who just want to show off their own

00:53:24.969 --> 00:53:27.590
products and discredit the competition. So I

00:53:27.590 --> 00:53:29.409
don't see that as too much of a coordinated effort.

00:53:30.150 --> 00:53:32.349
So while there is always challenge, and there's

00:53:32.349 --> 00:53:33.969
always going to be people with vested interests

00:53:33.969 --> 00:53:36.170
to prevent this, and we haven't discussed too

00:53:36.170 --> 00:53:37.690
much that, you know, the whole of the meat based

00:53:37.690 --> 00:53:39.750
industry in the veterinary community, but You

00:53:39.750 --> 00:53:41.230
know, I would love to see you bring for example,

00:53:41.449 --> 00:53:44.610
Crystal Heath on who's a veterinarian by trade

00:53:44.610 --> 00:53:47.769
who also has done a lot of good work here. And

00:53:47.769 --> 00:53:50.949
she could tell you more about that. The evidence

00:53:50.949 --> 00:53:53.309
is really strong, you know, and that's why you're

00:53:53.309 --> 00:53:56.190
seeing veterinary institutions changing their

00:53:56.190 --> 00:53:58.030
guidance. That's why you're seeing more people

00:53:58.030 --> 00:54:00.349
becoming interested from a consumer perspective,

00:54:00.610 --> 00:54:03.949
and from a movement perspective. And that's why

00:54:03.949 --> 00:54:05.769
while there's always opposition to an extent.

00:54:06.010 --> 00:54:08.670
I feel very positive about the trajectory of

00:54:08.670 --> 00:54:11.750
this movement and this sector as a whole. Yes,

00:54:11.750 --> 00:54:17.090
I love Crystal. I had her on the show, maybe

00:54:17.090 --> 00:54:22.570
three times, a few times. She's amazing. Okay,

00:54:22.789 --> 00:54:24.949
great. So did you want to add something Billy

00:54:24.949 --> 00:54:27.849
before I stopped the recording? Yeah, so look,

00:54:27.989 --> 00:54:31.289
what I'd say in summary, is that for anyone in

00:54:31.289 --> 00:54:33.590
the animal movement or for people who care about

00:54:33.760 --> 00:54:37.059
environmental sustainability or the ethics of

00:54:37.059 --> 00:54:39.980
animal farming or indeed the health of companion

00:54:39.980 --> 00:54:44.460
animals. This is a important and neglected field

00:54:44.460 --> 00:54:49.019
that would particularly value your support, I

00:54:49.019 --> 00:54:51.239
think. The arguments are pretty clear now. We

00:54:51.239 --> 00:54:54.159
could save six billion land animals from slaughter

00:54:54.159 --> 00:54:56.960
each year under a global transition to vegan

00:54:56.960 --> 00:55:00.800
diets for dogs alone, let alone cats. On top

00:55:00.800 --> 00:55:03.639
of that, we could save more greenhouse gases

00:55:03.639 --> 00:55:08.679
than the UK emits each year, 1 .5 times more,

00:55:08.719 --> 00:55:10.559
in fact. So I could essentially rest easy, I

00:55:10.559 --> 00:55:12.880
think, under that scenario. That's for dogs alone.

00:55:13.820 --> 00:55:15.679
And land use savings, I believe, larger than

00:55:15.679 --> 00:55:17.599
Mexico and Germany combined for dogs and cats.

00:55:18.000 --> 00:55:19.599
So, you know, there's some really significant

00:55:19.599 --> 00:55:22.500
environmental benefits here and some significant

00:55:23.309 --> 00:55:25.590
ethical benefits there as well. On top of that,

00:55:25.829 --> 00:55:28.590
we've got strong research here on the health

00:55:28.590 --> 00:55:30.710
benefits for dogs and cats. So I said earlier

00:55:30.710 --> 00:55:32.849
it was 12 and 13. That's not correct. We've got

00:55:32.849 --> 00:55:35.230
12 studies at the moment looking at the health

00:55:35.230 --> 00:55:37.269
impacts of dogs fed vegan and meat based diets.

00:55:37.610 --> 00:55:40.250
11 of those currently support the use of vegan

00:55:40.250 --> 00:55:42.969
diets. Three studies for cats. All three of those

00:55:42.969 --> 00:55:44.570
currently support the use of vegan diets for

00:55:44.570 --> 00:55:46.489
cats. We've also got a systematic literature

00:55:46.489 --> 00:55:49.159
review. that supports the use of these diets

00:55:49.159 --> 00:55:51.000
as well and confirms that evidence. So, you know,

00:55:51.000 --> 00:55:54.099
this is a really strong body of evidence. And

00:55:54.099 --> 00:55:57.320
now really is the time to accelerate this transition,

00:55:57.800 --> 00:56:00.440
certainly for dogs where fortunately most of

00:56:00.440 --> 00:56:02.840
the impacts are we've got more dogs globally

00:56:02.840 --> 00:56:07.699
than cats. It's about 535 million dogs. 475 million

00:56:07.699 --> 00:56:09.559
cats globally okay so we've got more dogs than

00:56:09.559 --> 00:56:11.719
cats and dogs are bigger so they're eating more

00:56:11.719 --> 00:56:14.039
right as well so the impact of dogs are much

00:56:14.039 --> 00:56:16.000
more significant unfortunately it's easier to

00:56:16.000 --> 00:56:19.079
transition them at the moment anyway and now

00:56:19.079 --> 00:56:21.139
that's why we're seeing reputable commercial

00:56:21.139 --> 00:56:23.559
companies creating vegan products we're seeing

00:56:23.559 --> 00:56:27.559
veterinary institutions opposing their opposition,

00:56:28.400 --> 00:56:31.059
taking away their opposition to these diets.

00:56:32.059 --> 00:56:34.380
And what I'd really love to see as well is more

00:56:34.380 --> 00:56:37.500
people in the animal movement coming on and working

00:56:37.500 --> 00:56:41.199
on this issue, talking to consumers, working

00:56:41.199 --> 00:56:44.239
with veterinary bodies, with governments, with

00:56:44.239 --> 00:56:47.380
regulators, with the pet industry to normalize

00:56:47.380 --> 00:56:51.429
these diets as quickly as possible. I hope that's

00:56:51.429 --> 00:56:54.730
compelling. If you'd like to learn more sustainablepetfood

00:56:54.730 --> 00:56:57.630
.info is a great site. There'll be some other

00:56:57.630 --> 00:56:59.769
resources in the show notes and please feel free

00:56:59.769 --> 00:57:27.719
to contact me as well. Well, let me say this.

00:57:28.119 --> 00:57:33.179
You convinced me to order vegan cat food for

00:57:33.179 --> 00:57:39.059
my cat and I will let her decide judge on you

00:57:39.059 --> 00:57:43.199
know if it's good enough or not but yeah you

00:57:43.199 --> 00:57:47.380
you convinced me to do this much and yeah I'm

00:57:47.380 --> 00:57:51.000
I invite people to also you know follow my example

00:57:51.000 --> 00:57:53.579
very good well looking forward to hearing how

00:57:53.579 --> 00:57:57.139
they like it do let me know and yeah thank you

00:57:57.139 --> 00:57:59.920
very much for the time today it's been a pleasure

00:57:59.920 --> 00:58:02.530
chatting with you Thank you so much, Billy. Thank

00:58:02.530 --> 00:58:05.449
you for all of your good work. Thank you everyone

00:58:05.449 --> 00:58:08.610
for listening. I kindly invite you to share this

00:58:08.610 --> 00:58:11.469
podcast with the vegans you know. Let's encourage

00:58:11.469 --> 00:58:15.429
more people to take action. Again, thank you

00:58:15.429 --> 00:58:18.429
so much for caring and I will see you next Tuesday

00:58:18.429 --> 00:58:19.869
for a new episode.
