1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:05,720
Sometimes, things just kind of have a way of popping back up after a while, and that

2
00:00:05,720 --> 00:00:12,780
definitely happened to me recently with culturally responsive teaching in the brain, and it kind

3
00:00:12,780 --> 00:00:16,680
of made connections for me to building thinking classrooms, and I'm wondering if anybody else

4
00:00:16,680 --> 00:00:25,080
has thought about this too.

5
00:00:25,080 --> 00:00:28,380
Hello and welcome to Making Number Sense Make Sense.

6
00:00:28,380 --> 00:00:33,440
A podcast for elementary teachers, specifically early elementary teachers, looking to really

7
00:00:33,440 --> 00:00:36,480
make an impact in the number sense of their students.

8
00:00:36,480 --> 00:00:40,880
I'm going to have to take you guys back a little bit to kind of get the full picture

9
00:00:40,880 --> 00:00:44,400
of my culturally responsive teaching journey.

10
00:00:44,400 --> 00:00:50,640
So my assistant principal at the time had asked me if I wanted to go to an equity symposium,

11
00:00:50,640 --> 00:00:53,720
and I was like, sure, I've never been to one before.

12
00:00:53,720 --> 00:00:54,720
Why not?

13
00:00:54,720 --> 00:00:59,520
I didn't realize that going to that equity symposium would put me on the equity team

14
00:00:59,520 --> 00:01:03,880
the coming school year and have us creating and giving professional development to the

15
00:01:03,880 --> 00:01:05,320
entire staff.

16
00:01:05,320 --> 00:01:11,000
And one of the resources that I really kind of took to was a book by Zaretta Hammond called

17
00:01:11,000 --> 00:01:13,640
Culturally Responsive Teaching in the Brain.

18
00:01:13,640 --> 00:01:19,440
I read the whole book cover to cover, and it was really a different way to look at the

19
00:01:19,440 --> 00:01:24,240
way that we teach in education and what we can do.

20
00:01:24,240 --> 00:01:29,660
If you are looking to make your teaching practice more culturally responsive, I highly recommend

21
00:01:29,660 --> 00:01:30,660
that book.

22
00:01:30,660 --> 00:01:32,720
She talks about different types of culture.

23
00:01:32,720 --> 00:01:37,720
She talks about the way that the brain works and kind of strategies and things that we

24
00:01:37,720 --> 00:01:43,600
as teachers can do to be more culturally responsive and inclusive for our students so that they

25
00:01:43,600 --> 00:01:46,080
can have the best outcomes possible.

26
00:01:46,080 --> 00:01:50,660
A lot of times when people think of culturally responsive teaching or culture, they think

27
00:01:50,660 --> 00:01:55,360
of surface culture like music, food, language.

28
00:01:55,360 --> 00:01:59,960
And in the book, Zaretta Hammond talks about deep culture, which is like the way that you

29
00:01:59,960 --> 00:02:05,600
communicate and how you interact with the world being something that can be tapped into

30
00:02:05,600 --> 00:02:07,640
to support learners.

31
00:02:07,640 --> 00:02:12,760
And I have to say, it's one of those things where like I was into it, I read it and then

32
00:02:12,760 --> 00:02:15,200
life happened and I was looking for this book.

33
00:02:15,200 --> 00:02:16,600
I couldn't find it anywhere.

34
00:02:16,600 --> 00:02:18,560
This was years ago, mind you.

35
00:02:18,560 --> 00:02:20,880
Years ago, I could not find this book anywhere.

36
00:02:20,880 --> 00:02:24,360
I was like, it has to be here somewhere, but I couldn't find it.

37
00:02:24,360 --> 00:02:29,720
And in my new role, we were talking about or we had to read about culturally responsive

38
00:02:29,720 --> 00:02:30,720
education.

39
00:02:30,720 --> 00:02:33,680
And I was like, oh, I already know about culturally responsive education.

40
00:02:33,680 --> 00:02:36,800
It's just going to be a little bit of a refresher.

41
00:02:36,800 --> 00:02:42,080
And I kind of came at it with a new lens because I was reading through it, had a lot of resources,

42
00:02:42,080 --> 00:02:48,520
not just didn't just talk about Zaretta Hammond's book, but I was like, huh.

43
00:02:48,520 --> 00:02:53,840
And it was kind of like connecting for me with the building thinking classrooms framework

44
00:02:53,840 --> 00:02:58,760
because as a lot of you know, I had tried it with my kindergartners and it was an amazing

45
00:02:58,760 --> 00:02:59,760
success.

46
00:02:59,760 --> 00:03:01,320
The kids loved it.

47
00:03:01,320 --> 00:03:05,160
And I kind of had to wonder like, why is it working?

48
00:03:05,160 --> 00:03:09,700
And when you're in it, you don't necessarily need to know why it works.

49
00:03:09,700 --> 00:03:10,700
You just know that it does.

50
00:03:10,700 --> 00:03:13,720
Like, I don't know how my cell phone works, but I know that it does.

51
00:03:13,720 --> 00:03:17,180
So like, I don't know the mechanisms inside of it, but it works.

52
00:03:17,180 --> 00:03:19,120
And that's all you really need to know.

53
00:03:19,120 --> 00:03:24,760
But when I was rereading the parts of the culturally responsive teaching in the brain

54
00:03:24,760 --> 00:03:26,400
book, I was like, you know what?

55
00:03:26,400 --> 00:03:31,920
I think that maybe Peter Liljadal and like Zaretta Hammond were on the same wavelength

56
00:03:31,920 --> 00:03:33,040
and they didn't even know it.

57
00:03:33,040 --> 00:03:37,220
Like I think that these two need to get together and chat because I think that they could really

58
00:03:37,220 --> 00:03:39,600
build off of each other's work.

59
00:03:39,600 --> 00:03:43,640
You know, I feel like it just kind of, it's like a collab that needs to happen, you know,

60
00:03:43,640 --> 00:03:49,320
like Cardi and Megan or Jay-Z and Beyonce or Shakira and anybody, it needs to happen.

61
00:03:49,320 --> 00:03:52,080
So the more I thought about it and I was like, you know what?

62
00:03:52,080 --> 00:03:57,920
I think that he might have unintentionally tapped into that deep culture with his research.

63
00:03:57,920 --> 00:04:03,500
And that's why, or one of the reasons why, his methodology works so well.

64
00:04:03,500 --> 00:04:08,240
When you think about culturally responsive teaching or culturally responsive education,

65
00:04:08,240 --> 00:04:13,720
a lot of times they talk about, you know, PBL and bringing in kids real live into the

66
00:04:13,720 --> 00:04:18,320
classroom to help with engagement, to help activate prior knowledge, all of that.

67
00:04:18,320 --> 00:04:23,000
But a lot of times when you think about that, it seems like it's a more, I don't want to

68
00:04:23,000 --> 00:04:28,720
say easy, but it's a more natural flow to talk about culturally responsive education

69
00:04:28,720 --> 00:04:35,160
through the lens of language arts or social studies because it can connect seemingly more

70
00:04:35,160 --> 00:04:40,280
easily to our students than math, which I feel can be really removed, can feel very

71
00:04:40,280 --> 00:04:43,680
removed for a lot of students.

72
00:04:43,680 --> 00:04:49,880
So when I was thinking about culture and math, I was thinking about the book, like I said,

73
00:04:49,880 --> 00:04:52,040
and the Building Thinking Classrooms book.

74
00:04:52,040 --> 00:04:58,360
And I was thinking that what ended up happening is this framework kind of delves into deep

75
00:04:58,360 --> 00:05:02,200
culture that makes math more meaningful.

76
00:05:02,200 --> 00:05:05,780
From the content, they are learning how to learn.

77
00:05:05,780 --> 00:05:12,280
And a lot of students come to us with a rich history of oral tradition, storytelling, talking

78
00:05:12,280 --> 00:05:13,400
to learn.

79
00:05:13,400 --> 00:05:18,200
So in the Building Thinking Classroom frameworks, where all of the students are talking and

80
00:05:18,200 --> 00:05:22,360
learning together, they're kind of building their understanding in a very collectivist

81
00:05:22,360 --> 00:05:27,380
way, which is how a lot of our students come to us with that history and their brains are

82
00:05:27,380 --> 00:05:29,280
primed to learn that way.

83
00:05:29,280 --> 00:05:34,860
So if you can bring in that way of processing to the classroom, it's taking advantage of

84
00:05:34,860 --> 00:05:38,800
neural pathways that are already there and making them stronger.

85
00:05:38,800 --> 00:05:43,240
So instead of being held up by content, they look at everything as something they can solve

86
00:05:43,240 --> 00:05:48,520
because they've had practice solving it and looking at things in different ways and understanding

87
00:05:48,520 --> 00:05:53,120
that knowledge comes from everybody in the room, not just the teacher.

88
00:05:53,120 --> 00:05:56,420
Now I'm going to read you this quote, and you're going to have to see if you can figure

89
00:05:56,420 --> 00:05:58,880
out which book it's from.

90
00:05:58,880 --> 00:06:05,040
We want them to have the ability to size up any task, map out a strategy for completing

91
00:06:05,040 --> 00:06:07,840
it and execute the plan.

92
00:06:07,840 --> 00:06:11,480
Now if you've read the Building Thinking Classroom's book, it could have come right out of there.

93
00:06:11,480 --> 00:06:16,360
But the sentence before says, our ultimate goal as culturally responsive teachers is

94
00:06:16,360 --> 00:06:19,640
to help dependent learners learn how to learn.

95
00:06:19,640 --> 00:06:24,440
And then we want them to have the ability to size up any task, map out a strategy for

96
00:06:24,440 --> 00:06:26,800
completing it, and then execute the plan.

97
00:06:26,800 --> 00:06:30,680
I was like, those two things could have come from the same book.

98
00:06:30,680 --> 00:06:32,240
They're on the same wavelength.

99
00:06:32,240 --> 00:06:39,120
So what are the similarities between these two books that might be a reason why the Building

100
00:06:39,120 --> 00:06:42,220
Thinking Classroom's framework works so well?

101
00:06:42,220 --> 00:06:47,320
Just a caveat before I dig into this, being a culturally responsive educator isn't just

102
00:06:47,320 --> 00:06:49,960
about using the right strategy.

103
00:06:49,960 --> 00:06:55,480
It's really about understanding yourself, understanding the way that you communicate

104
00:06:55,480 --> 00:07:01,240
and how that might differ from your students, and also what implicit bias you might have.

105
00:07:01,240 --> 00:07:04,840
And implicit in nature means that you don't realize that you have it.

106
00:07:04,840 --> 00:07:12,160
But it's really about examining yourself as a person to know how to best interact with

107
00:07:12,160 --> 00:07:16,200
your students so that they can be successful no matter what they're doing.

108
00:07:16,200 --> 00:07:20,680
The strategies she discusses don't come until the very end of the book because she spends

109
00:07:20,680 --> 00:07:26,000
so much time talking about what culture is, what you can do before you go to this.

110
00:07:26,000 --> 00:07:31,840
This is like, do the work on yourself first and then these strategies will make more sense.

111
00:07:31,840 --> 00:07:37,840
Zaretta Hammond outlines in her book four strategies to lead students through the stages

112
00:07:37,840 --> 00:07:44,160
of information processing, which are ignite, chunk, chew, and review.

113
00:07:44,160 --> 00:07:47,200
So in ignite, you're getting the brain's attention.

114
00:07:47,200 --> 00:07:50,440
In chunking, you're making information digestible.

115
00:07:50,440 --> 00:07:53,880
In chewing, you're actively processing new information.

116
00:07:53,880 --> 00:07:56,920
And review is having a chance to apply new learning.

117
00:07:56,920 --> 00:08:00,880
Now if you're familiar with the building thinking classrooms framework, it falls into those

118
00:08:00,880 --> 00:08:02,720
categories really well.

119
00:08:02,720 --> 00:08:04,760
The ignite, getting the brain's attention.

120
00:08:04,760 --> 00:08:09,100
When you're introducing a math task, you want a story, you want to puzzle something to get

121
00:08:09,100 --> 00:08:13,440
kids like, oh, I kind of want to figure that out or I want to solve that problem.

122
00:08:13,440 --> 00:08:14,760
It's a mystery.

123
00:08:14,760 --> 00:08:20,320
And then chunking, you're starting with a low floor, high ceiling task that is accessible

124
00:08:20,320 --> 00:08:21,960
to all of your students.

125
00:08:21,960 --> 00:08:23,880
And then they start to build on that information.

126
00:08:23,880 --> 00:08:27,200
They might get a task that's a little more challenging after that and a little more challenging

127
00:08:27,200 --> 00:08:28,840
and a little more challenging.

128
00:08:28,840 --> 00:08:35,240
And the kids can use the strategies that they worked on for the first task and kind of roll

129
00:08:35,240 --> 00:08:38,240
it out into the second and third.

130
00:08:38,240 --> 00:08:41,680
And while they're doing that, they're actively processing this new information.

131
00:08:41,680 --> 00:08:46,000
They're processing from their partner, they're processing from the other people in the room,

132
00:08:46,000 --> 00:08:51,680
seeing everybody's work on the boards really helps them kind of understand lots of different

133
00:08:51,680 --> 00:08:56,520
viewpoints at the same time and kind of make it make sense for them.

134
00:08:56,520 --> 00:09:02,360
Creating visuals and non-linguistic representations is a really powerful way for students to process

135
00:09:02,360 --> 00:09:03,720
information.

136
00:09:03,720 --> 00:09:10,120
So the idea of drawing your problem solving and everybody seeing all these different examples

137
00:09:10,120 --> 00:09:14,760
can really help with their own information processing and help them understand the problems

138
00:09:14,760 --> 00:09:15,760
that they're working on.

139
00:09:15,760 --> 00:09:20,480
And after that with the reviewing or having a chance to apply the new learning, that's

140
00:09:20,480 --> 00:09:27,280
kind of the consolidation or check your understanding part of the problem solving session where

141
00:09:27,280 --> 00:09:31,480
they see if they really did kind of understand what they were doing on the boards and be

142
00:09:31,480 --> 00:09:37,560
able to use that information or use those strategies to new problems in kind of a different

143
00:09:37,560 --> 00:09:43,960
setting or a different way by choosing their own question or questions to solve that are

144
00:09:43,960 --> 00:09:47,160
similar to the one that they just worked on.

145
00:09:47,160 --> 00:09:52,000
And both frameworks just kind of fit so well like a puzzle, like they were part of the

146
00:09:52,000 --> 00:09:58,440
same puzzle kind of hitting on the same idea and seeing similar positive results, hopefully

147
00:09:58,440 --> 00:10:00,400
seeing similar positive results.

148
00:10:00,400 --> 00:10:06,640
I'm wondering if anybody else has kind of put their pulse on this and what your thoughts

149
00:10:06,640 --> 00:10:07,640
are.

150
00:10:07,640 --> 00:10:10,340
I'm really curious, am I just making this up or does it seem like it makes sense to

151
00:10:10,340 --> 00:10:11,340
you too?

152
00:10:11,340 --> 00:10:14,680
Please send me a message and let me know your thoughts.

153
00:10:14,680 --> 00:10:18,640
And before I go, I do want to share a little something that just warmed my heart.

154
00:10:18,640 --> 00:10:24,740
I'm in touch with the teacher that has my students from last year and she was also a

155
00:10:24,740 --> 00:10:28,000
teacher who was like, oh, I'd like to try building thinking classrooms.

156
00:10:28,000 --> 00:10:33,680
So she tried last year, she was continuing this year and she said that when my students

157
00:10:33,680 --> 00:10:38,360
saw like the building thinking classrooms, like little cards I use and everything that

158
00:10:38,360 --> 00:10:43,500
they were so excited, they're like, oh, we did this last year, I loved it, we get to

159
00:10:43,500 --> 00:10:44,500
do it again.

160
00:10:44,500 --> 00:10:48,880
They were so excited and that just, I can't even tell you how exciting that is for me

161
00:10:48,880 --> 00:10:53,400
to hear, to hear these kids be so excited about doing math, especially because, you

162
00:10:53,400 --> 00:10:57,160
know, there's a lot of people who just don't like math, they didn't get it, they're like,

163
00:10:57,160 --> 00:10:58,520
oh, I don't want to do it ever.

164
00:10:58,520 --> 00:11:03,760
So to hear all of them be so excited about it just warms my heart that hopefully they

165
00:11:03,760 --> 00:11:09,200
can carry that attitude about math throughout their education career and it's something

166
00:11:09,200 --> 00:11:37,200
that they don't feel intimidated by, but they feel empowered to do.

