WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:02.459
I'm Sean King, and I'm the chief revenue officer

00:00:02.459 --> 00:00:04.620
and general manager for the commercial division

00:00:04.620 --> 00:00:07.960
at Veritone. Veritone, we're an AI software company

00:00:07.960 --> 00:00:12.199
where we help organizations in both the public

00:00:12.199 --> 00:00:16.219
and private sector help make sense out of their

00:00:16.219 --> 00:00:19.120
unstructured data, specifically meaning audio

00:00:19.120 --> 00:00:22.500
and video. So across our organization, we ingest

00:00:22.500 --> 00:00:26.870
about 150 ,000 hours of content a day. and append

00:00:26.870 --> 00:00:29.850
kind of frame -by -frame analysis of what's taking

00:00:29.850 --> 00:00:34.350
place in the audio or in the video, who's speaking,

00:00:34.590 --> 00:00:36.549
what are they talking about, what objects, what

00:00:36.549 --> 00:00:39.409
logos may be in the background. And we turn that

00:00:39.409 --> 00:00:43.189
into kind of actionable data that they can use

00:00:43.189 --> 00:00:47.409
for a litany of different opportunities across

00:00:47.409 --> 00:00:49.789
their organization. We obviously have heard the

00:00:49.789 --> 00:00:53.369
news about Wondery this week. What do you think?

00:00:53.929 --> 00:00:57.350
What do you think went on there? Why have Amazon

00:00:57.350 --> 00:01:00.049
made the big changes that they have? At the end

00:01:00.049 --> 00:01:02.289
of the day, all these organizations make strategic

00:01:02.289 --> 00:01:04.569
decisions about what their priorities are in

00:01:04.569 --> 00:01:06.969
the organization. And then especially in an organization

00:01:06.969 --> 00:01:10.329
as big as Amazon, what are those downstream implications,

00:01:10.849 --> 00:01:13.730
broadly speaking, across that organization? But

00:01:13.730 --> 00:01:19.109
in my opinion, that restructuring is what I'll

00:01:19.109 --> 00:01:20.969
consider a little bit more of a recalibration.

00:01:22.540 --> 00:01:24.920
their shift potentially for more of that traditional

00:01:24.920 --> 00:01:28.180
studio models into more potentially integrated

00:01:28.180 --> 00:01:31.640
audio ecosystems. I mean, obviously with having

00:01:31.640 --> 00:01:34.159
Wondery and having Audible and having these different

00:01:34.159 --> 00:01:37.260
groups, there's a natural opportunity to kind

00:01:37.260 --> 00:01:40.299
of consolidate those different ecosystems. And

00:01:40.299 --> 00:01:41.959
also at the same time, kind of set themselves

00:01:41.959 --> 00:01:45.040
up. I mean, more and more podcasts are becoming

00:01:45.040 --> 00:01:48.359
video orientated and more platform agnostic even

00:01:48.359 --> 00:01:50.280
in those. Like even when I go through my social

00:01:50.280 --> 00:01:54.480
feeds these days, just how many videos I'm watching

00:01:54.480 --> 00:01:56.739
that is basically just a recording of a podcast

00:01:56.739 --> 00:01:59.459
that I would likely listen to as well. And you're

00:01:59.459 --> 00:02:01.959
just starting to see different ways in which

00:02:01.959 --> 00:02:05.040
the medium is being consumed. And at the same

00:02:05.040 --> 00:02:08.919
time, allowing their brands to... you know, potentially

00:02:08.919 --> 00:02:11.340
be able to navigate some more of their kind of

00:02:11.340 --> 00:02:13.379
what I'll consider platform control distribution

00:02:13.379 --> 00:02:16.789
and monetization. And obviously, in an organization

00:02:16.789 --> 00:02:19.590
that has so many assets in it from Amazon, if

00:02:19.590 --> 00:02:21.210
you just think about it from their audio divisions,

00:02:21.469 --> 00:02:24.090
their film divisions, their, you know, their

00:02:24.090 --> 00:02:28.069
streaming platforms across that, you know, having

00:02:28.069 --> 00:02:30.169
these abilities to be able to consolidate, I

00:02:30.169 --> 00:02:31.770
mean, it's typically what you would expect to

00:02:31.770 --> 00:02:34.129
see in these organizations. Yeah, yeah. And I

00:02:34.129 --> 00:02:36.949
mean, it's interesting, we were looking at how

00:02:36.949 --> 00:02:40.189
Wondery has done. Wondery has done more podcast

00:02:40.189 --> 00:02:44.629
to TV conversions than any other company has.

00:02:44.680 --> 00:02:46.620
has done. They've done particularly well in terms

00:02:46.620 --> 00:02:49.319
of that. They've obviously released a massive

00:02:49.319 --> 00:02:53.020
amount of content. But of course, Amazon being

00:02:53.020 --> 00:02:56.080
Amazon, we can't quite see whether or not that

00:02:56.080 --> 00:02:58.699
was a sustainable business model. What's your

00:02:58.699 --> 00:03:03.240
gut feel in terms of that? Well, I mean, it's

00:03:03.240 --> 00:03:06.280
a game of numbers. And those. And look, at the

00:03:06.280 --> 00:03:08.560
end of the day, content is still king. You know,

00:03:08.599 --> 00:03:11.139
I think a lot of the success that Wondery had

00:03:11.139 --> 00:03:14.060
in that even dates back to Hernan and the founders

00:03:14.060 --> 00:03:16.680
and having background in Fox and everything else

00:03:16.680 --> 00:03:19.120
that's there. So being able to, you know, make

00:03:19.120 --> 00:03:21.360
the right bets on what type of content and what

00:03:21.360 --> 00:03:23.659
content and what things may be able to transcend

00:03:23.659 --> 00:03:28.139
platforms and transcend, you know, from an audio

00:03:28.139 --> 00:03:31.159
only, you know, medium into, you know, more storytelling

00:03:31.159 --> 00:03:34.780
from those. But again, to that point. What a

00:03:34.780 --> 00:03:37.039
wonderful opportunity in these areas and why

00:03:37.039 --> 00:03:39.120
I've always loved the podcasting space from those

00:03:39.120 --> 00:03:42.849
is. The barrier to entry in podcasting and being

00:03:42.849 --> 00:03:44.889
able to be able to create this and be able to

00:03:44.889 --> 00:03:46.969
do this, to be able to incubate, to really develop

00:03:46.969 --> 00:03:49.370
these things and build that audience. I mean,

00:03:49.370 --> 00:03:51.449
and build the storytelling elements of it there

00:03:51.449 --> 00:03:53.770
to be able to kind of elevate that through the

00:03:53.770 --> 00:03:55.969
different, you know, I'll consider entertainment

00:03:55.969 --> 00:04:00.229
supply chains is is is. And I think just looking

00:04:00.229 --> 00:04:03.409
at Amazon specifically and knowing that from

00:04:03.409 --> 00:04:05.949
an audio to potentially a streaming platform

00:04:05.949 --> 00:04:09.580
to Twitch, to video, to, you know, movies. and

00:04:09.580 --> 00:04:11.780
everything else that they do. I mean, they have

00:04:11.780 --> 00:04:14.039
an entire stack, so to speak. Is the revenue

00:04:14.039 --> 00:04:16.899
for the podcast industry still very much focused

00:04:16.899 --> 00:04:20.439
around host -read ads? I mean, clearly, when

00:04:20.439 --> 00:04:22.579
you look at some of the content that Wondery

00:04:22.579 --> 00:04:25.680
was producing, host -read ads are quite difficult

00:04:25.680 --> 00:04:28.850
in that sort of narrative. you know, experience

00:04:28.850 --> 00:04:32.230
anyway. But are we still essentially a host -read

00:04:32.230 --> 00:04:35.670
ad industry or are we moving to something a bit

00:04:35.670 --> 00:04:38.569
more complex? Well, I hope we're going to something

00:04:38.569 --> 00:04:41.670
that's a healthy medium before. You know, I always

00:04:41.670 --> 00:04:43.689
loved about the, what I always still love about

00:04:43.689 --> 00:04:46.569
the podcasting space is, you know, it reminds

00:04:46.569 --> 00:04:49.389
me of, you know, driving to work in the 90s.

00:04:49.829 --> 00:04:53.029
And I had my favorite entertainment that I would

00:04:53.029 --> 00:04:54.949
listen to. And it was structured in the timeline

00:04:54.949 --> 00:04:57.610
that I would listen to it. And I would go to

00:04:57.610 --> 00:05:00.470
those. And it's the trusted voices. It's on demand.

00:05:00.850 --> 00:05:05.009
But the accessibility of it is just great. And

00:05:05.009 --> 00:05:08.769
I think the host read ads is a special key component.

00:05:09.480 --> 00:05:12.480
to podcasting but for podcasting to continue

00:05:12.480 --> 00:05:15.339
to scale to continue to evolve there has to be

00:05:15.339 --> 00:05:18.680
a healthy balance on being able to create and

00:05:18.680 --> 00:05:20.660
develop what i'll consider the relationship and

00:05:20.660 --> 00:05:23.519
the engagement and how do you support that with

00:05:23.519 --> 00:05:26.379
other ads i mean we see this all the time in

00:05:26.379 --> 00:05:28.600
traditionals you know you have you know let's

00:05:28.600 --> 00:05:31.720
pick pick on tv for a second Okay, well, yeah,

00:05:31.759 --> 00:05:33.459
you want to have your Super Bowl ad. You want

00:05:33.459 --> 00:05:36.680
to have that tentpole opportunity. But as a standalone

00:05:36.680 --> 00:05:38.879
basis, it's really hard to make that tentpole

00:05:38.879 --> 00:05:41.560
event work if you don't have a supporting cast.

00:05:42.360 --> 00:05:46.259
of advertisements and other medias and other

00:05:46.259 --> 00:05:48.360
things taking place to make you leverage that

00:05:48.360 --> 00:05:51.300
the most. And so it's similar here, in my opinion,

00:05:51.339 --> 00:05:53.839
on the podcasting spaces. You have to leverage

00:05:53.839 --> 00:05:56.040
that relationship that you have the opportunity

00:05:56.040 --> 00:05:58.480
to with the host, but you also have to support

00:05:58.480 --> 00:06:00.759
it with everything there to make sure that you're

00:06:00.759 --> 00:06:05.180
staying consistent. What's coming? Who's the

00:06:05.180 --> 00:06:08.899
stranger at the gate that your dog is barking

00:06:08.899 --> 00:06:12.480
at? What should we be worried about? uh in the

00:06:12.480 --> 00:06:15.740
future in terms of the podcast industry how are

00:06:15.740 --> 00:06:18.160
things changing i mean i think things are changing

00:06:18.160 --> 00:06:20.600
so much as we're seeing such acceleration and

00:06:20.600 --> 00:06:22.680
all these other different platforms and i do

00:06:22.680 --> 00:06:25.579
apologize for my i'm i'm afraid to go down and

00:06:25.579 --> 00:06:28.240
don't worry about the dog 200 dog downstairs

00:06:28.240 --> 00:06:33.160
is 200 pound dog but but i think what is changing

00:06:33.160 --> 00:06:37.100
is being able to find and where and navigate

00:06:37.100 --> 00:06:39.180
the connections across these multi -platforms

00:06:39.180 --> 00:06:42.000
you know what is your core podcasting group that's

00:06:42.000 --> 00:06:44.399
listening to it are you live streaming that and

00:06:44.399 --> 00:06:46.639
that audience on youtube how does that transcend

00:06:46.639 --> 00:06:48.819
over to the different social networks either

00:06:48.819 --> 00:06:51.879
on instagram or facebook or tiktok or any of

00:06:51.879 --> 00:06:54.819
these others you know your audience just pool

00:06:54.819 --> 00:06:59.000
just got much more fragmented and and and how

00:06:59.000 --> 00:07:02.420
do you make sure you're you know staying connected

00:07:03.129 --> 00:07:06.889
And as a brand, how you're making sure that you're

00:07:06.889 --> 00:07:11.089
trying your best to uniquely be able to serve

00:07:11.089 --> 00:07:13.550
the target customer that you're trying to see

00:07:13.550 --> 00:07:17.389
without inundating them all over the place. It's

00:07:17.389 --> 00:07:20.310
a challenging balance that's a requirement of,

00:07:20.329 --> 00:07:23.269
you know, smart people and good technology and

00:07:23.269 --> 00:07:26.060
better data. that will allow you to be able to

00:07:26.060 --> 00:07:27.939
help make the right decisions. I mean, I guess

00:07:27.939 --> 00:07:32.100
the world of podcasting has seen what TV has

00:07:32.100 --> 00:07:35.720
seen in the last decade, what radio has seen

00:07:35.720 --> 00:07:38.620
in the last decade, in that instead of being

00:07:38.620 --> 00:07:42.079
consumed on one platform, whether that's live

00:07:42.079 --> 00:07:46.699
TV or whether that's AM, FM. all of a sudden

00:07:46.699 --> 00:07:49.040
things are being consumed on lots of different

00:07:49.040 --> 00:07:51.860
platforms. How complicated does that make it

00:07:51.860 --> 00:07:54.680
in terms of advertising and reaching audiences?

00:07:55.019 --> 00:07:56.680
It's challenging in a case because you're talking

00:07:56.680 --> 00:08:00.040
about diverse medias that have very diverse measurements.

00:08:00.560 --> 00:08:02.779
And because they have very diverse measurements

00:08:02.779 --> 00:08:04.860
means they have very different forms of currency.

00:08:06.769 --> 00:08:09.209
And trying to figure out that, you know, trying

00:08:09.209 --> 00:08:11.730
to make $1 kind of equal the same across those.

00:08:11.810 --> 00:08:13.709
It's very different when you're looking at a

00:08:13.709 --> 00:08:16.810
television audience measured on, you know, how

00:08:16.810 --> 00:08:19.649
many thousands Nielsen or Comscore may estimate

00:08:19.649 --> 00:08:23.889
may have watched or listened to this across AM,

00:08:24.009 --> 00:08:26.730
FM or television. How does that differ when you're

00:08:26.730 --> 00:08:29.050
listening to it from your, you know, Apple streaming

00:08:29.050 --> 00:08:31.610
device? Or how does that differ when you're downloading

00:08:31.610 --> 00:08:34.809
through iTunes? you know you all very different

00:08:34.809 --> 00:08:37.049
unique and all the currencies are a little different

00:08:37.049 --> 00:08:40.450
on that uh so it's really the right mix of you

00:08:40.450 --> 00:08:43.049
know your media mix modeling and and how you're

00:08:43.049 --> 00:08:45.230
doing that so i always you know would advise

00:08:45.230 --> 00:08:49.830
everyone to think about and agree on you know

00:08:49.830 --> 00:08:53.460
there's not the silver bullet quite yet But you

00:08:53.460 --> 00:08:55.220
at least have to stand on what you're going to

00:08:55.220 --> 00:08:57.539
put your value, your importance against and define

00:08:57.539 --> 00:08:59.159
on what your measurement is and how you're going

00:08:59.159 --> 00:09:01.379
to measure success. And then you're going to

00:09:01.379 --> 00:09:03.220
have to look at each one of these things somewhat

00:09:03.220 --> 00:09:06.019
uniquely different, uniquely to make sure that,

00:09:06.059 --> 00:09:07.360
you know, you're accounting for it appropriately.

00:09:07.779 --> 00:09:12.179
And in a future where podcasting is certainly

00:09:12.179 --> 00:09:15.179
talking to some people, podcasting is essentially

00:09:15.179 --> 00:09:20.490
shifting to YouTube. Is that a good future for

00:09:20.490 --> 00:09:23.809
where the industry is going in your view or where

00:09:23.809 --> 00:09:27.450
do we go from that? I think it's a good complementary

00:09:27.450 --> 00:09:32.570
piece to those. At the end of the day, it was

00:09:32.570 --> 00:09:35.250
true 100 years ago and it'll be true in 100 years.

00:09:35.370 --> 00:09:40.129
Content is king. And what's wonderful about both

00:09:40.129 --> 00:09:43.750
YouTube and podcasting is, again, as I was mentioning

00:09:43.750 --> 00:09:47.769
earlier, that low barrier to entry. on i mean

00:09:47.769 --> 00:09:50.269
on how you can create and how you'll be able

00:09:50.269 --> 00:09:53.070
to do that and there are people like myself like

00:09:53.070 --> 00:09:56.769
i don't like to sit down and watch a podcast

00:09:56.769 --> 00:10:00.210
on youtube like and it's it's for those i like

00:10:00.210 --> 00:10:03.990
to engage in a podcast like just purely just

00:10:03.990 --> 00:10:07.980
me and my ears It's my opportunity. It's my focus.

00:10:08.139 --> 00:10:09.940
That's how I enjoy it. That's how I get the most

00:10:09.940 --> 00:10:12.500
out of it. You know, when I'm going to sit down

00:10:12.500 --> 00:10:14.740
and watch something, I'm not going to want to

00:10:14.740 --> 00:10:17.480
watch that. But there are people that are probably

00:10:17.480 --> 00:10:21.100
the antithesis of me and like to have that sight,

00:10:21.139 --> 00:10:24.000
sound, and motion with everything. I look at

00:10:24.000 --> 00:10:26.000
it as if I watch my daughter. I mean, and she

00:10:26.000 --> 00:10:28.919
does everything on YouTube. Very different than

00:10:28.919 --> 00:10:31.620
me. But it's just all you're doing is you're

00:10:31.620 --> 00:10:34.879
making sure that your content is accessible and

00:10:34.879 --> 00:10:37.559
all the different fragmented vehicles that are

00:10:37.559 --> 00:10:39.940
there to consume it. And, you know, and you're

00:10:39.940 --> 00:10:42.620
just meeting your your audience where they're

00:10:42.620 --> 00:10:45.480
at. Sean, it's been great to chat. Thank you

00:10:45.480 --> 00:10:47.279
so much for your time. My pleasure. Thanks for

00:10:47.279 --> 00:10:47.720
having me, James.
