Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the sheep Get Sheared podcast. I'm your host, Austin Creed. Today. My friends, we're going to be talking about how feminism failed females more. And, you know, before you get upset, I can already tell you're probably upset. I've done a whole show on how feminism. Has freed men. How it's failed men. We've talked about this from the male perspective before, and trust me, I'll continue to do it again and again, but we're going to talk about how this unfortunately affects women as well. Because when you think feminism, you think that, oh, it only benefits women and whatnot. And you're not wrong when you say that. Frankly, but here's something that maybe you didn't know. You know the boomers and the Gen. X women, you know, the ones like your mom and your grandma. Whatever. They're the ones. Who championed this? Right. They were like, you go feminist. Feminism was great. But you know what? My generation, Gen. Alpha, I'm telling you, I'm telling you, man, these people, my people. We don't like this. A lot of women I know, they don't want to go out there, they don't want to go in corporate America and work there behind off for 50 years. Oh man, they wanna go in the soft girl era. They wanna come out here and they wanna go be stay at home moms again. I mean, let's keep in mind for a second. The economy is in the garbage can. So that plays an element in this. So don't fall for this trap. Gentlemen that ohh women want to be filming in again. I'm in the clear. The first what's gonna go down? No, no, no. 

Ohh hell no. 

I wouldn't be so sure about that. I'll tell you this right now. I wish to God that was true, but I'm going to warn you, I don't think it is. And so we're going to show. Feminism failing women. And you know, I'm, I'm tempted to use it to females because apparently people don't want to tell me. Ohh. Women and men are social constructs. No. And bloody bloody, bloody bloody blah blah. 

You lied to me. 

Well, you know what I'm going to do what I want to do. This is my show that there is that they want to do something about it. Well, then go right ahead. Make my day. But you know what? We're going to go to the first clip of the day and you know what's really interesting on the little side note, I think that women are watching. 

I was looking. Apology letter on the table giving an opportunity to the public. 

Content on this side of the Internet that might be watching Andrew Tate fresh and fit CGA might be watching these guys shout out to all those guys. They might be watching these guys and cause they're stealing or pearly things. What is it with? I can not go and look at anything like. 

Is absolutely about taking something away from men. One child has 20 marbles and the other has 10 marbles and the child. 

Like. Just keep talking to it without. Really. And I have nothing against Pearl. The problem is a woman should never be the face of the manosphere. Red pill, whatever you want to call it, cause it just doesn't work. That's the problem. It doesn't. I don't care whether I agree with it. It just doesn't work because she's very easy. He. You will like to pick on her because she's an easy target. Not to say she's wrong, necessarily, but that she's an easy target to discredit without actually diving into the intellectual abilities. But we're going to look at this dichotomy of liberation because liberation both allows you to go your own way, but then makes it really hard if you want to stick with tradition. 

Yeah. 

You know, we talk about this reality of cherry picking a lot of women, like the cherry pick. They want to have the freedoms to do what a man can do, but then they also want a man to provide for them like they're traditional women, which they are not. So we get stuck in this catch 22 of we can't be traditional men or we're toxic, or if we want to be progressive men, we don't get any action cause. No one respects us. So if you're in this catch 22, my only advice to you is just forget all this bull crap and just do what you wanna do. Look, if you want to be an effeminate dude who wears pink and all this crap, go right ahead. I don't care what you do. Just don't expect me to tell you that you're the pinnacle of masculinity when you do some crap like that. That's all I'm saying. You wanna go out here? Y'all tippy toes, rainbows, unicorns, and and and have all. These. Acronyms next to your name and go right ahead. See if I care. I don't care what you do. Just don't come over here and tell me that I need to affirm you or reaffirm or whatever. I'm not doing any that crap. But let's look at what this lady has to say about feminism. Let's jump right in and. Let's do this. 

I was a feminist when feminism was about equality, about leveling the playing field, giving women an opportunity to find their rightful place in the public world, which was tremendously important and exciting when we achieved that. But what feminism, feminism today to me, is all about advantaging women at the expense of men. And it's become very much caught up in the demonization of males, presenting them always at a disadvantage. 

It honestly offends me that there is an entire ideology built on the premise that I as a woman. Sacrifice from others simply so that I could contend with the world around me. A woman has never held me back so. Feminism had its cute little run. For 50. But it's time to hang it up and accept the basic reality men and women are different. We have different desires, different tendencies and different responsibilities. We are not meant to be men, and we are certainly not meant to disrespect and degrade masculinity. So stop celebrating femininity as something superior to masculinity and start celebrating both as valuable pillars to our well-being. And culture. 

You know, I'm going to tell you, gentlemen, I don't disagree with what she's saying. But there's one thing that you probably did not patch on to. Ohh. I will pause for one second and I wanna. I'm gonna ask you a question. What? In there. Did you hear that? Did not hear? That was a subliminal message. That should have tipped you off. That something was wrong. Here. And that she wasn't actually trying to stand up for you, but she was standing up for herself up. I'll wait for a second and I'll let you think about it. You ready? You come up with the answer yet or you stomped? All right, I'll give you the answer. The answer is she benefits by what she's talking about. Yeah, that's right. She benefits by that. You don't think that women benefit when they're at stay at home mom, and they don't have to go out there and work in the corporate jungle? Of course they do. Now there's some women who want to do that. Yeah. So there's some men who don't like to do. That, of course. But guess what? We are seeing a blowback, a reaction. The older woman who was in there, who was in the the boomer, the Gen. X, you know, type woman who said that feminism was great. Has seen the evolution of feminism because a lot of people don't even know where feminism really comes from, and we'll get into that. I'll give you a little teaser about the bat. It actually really stemmed from Marks and angles. Who wrote a book you might have heard of is called the Communist Manifesto, and I'm not one of these types that says that communism is. Blaming for everything. OK, I'll, I'll. I'll leave that for the less intelligent people. But I'll tell you. These sorts of philosophies don't develop in a vacuum. In fact, we see them play out and all the planning on selling this till later. But we'll we'll look at. It right now. Is how it marks an angle spot for women's liberation. I mean, maybe you. Didn't know this. But it says Karl Marx and Frederick Angles, who wrote the Communist manifesto. Or champions of women's liberation, both in theory as well as in practice in public and in private. Important work has already been published according to both of them, women in the family and developing their theoretical framework into a more symbolic understanding. Of women depression. Now you might have not understood what. You know what we just said? I wouldn't blame you. Basically, what they're saying is they took an idea that sounded good on paper and they tried to apply it to the real world. Let's see. What else do I want to read? This article is a step into readdressing that balance you see. One thing you'll notice, especially about 1 telltale sign of communism, socialism type of ideology is this idea of fairness and balance. OK, as soon as you hear phrases about workers of the world. Right. Fairness, equality, oppression, liberation and stuff like that. You immediately have to look into. The influence, because I guarantee you it has some kind of roots into communism, whether it's Marxist Marxism, communism could be Mao's idea. I mean, just like every other political ideology. You know there's. Democracy leaders, different types of democracy, different types of republics, any kind of lust feel like this has different branches. They have the same shrunk for different branches. So you need to see. Everything eventually kind of flows back to the roots and the roots stem from Karl Marx and Frederick Angles. Let's see. Oh, here it is. Let's read what he says throughout their lives, Marks and angles were actively were active alongside women and men in building opposition to emerging capitalism. In the 1830s, Marks and angles were beginning their revolutionary careers. They're both lawyers, by the way. Especially Marx, I'm pretty sure Lionel Marx was a. Was a a lawyer. I'm pretty sure Ingles was too. Women participated in utopian socialist organizations. Again utopian. Utopian is another telltale sign you're dealing with. The more extreme ideology while raising their own demands for equality. Now equality is a very important distinction. Again, here's the I want to tell you something right now. If you ever go into any level of philosophy, politics, a theory or science or anything, and you do not establish terms, if you are a professor, if you are an intellectual, A philosopher, whatever, and you do not establish terms because I can use the same word as you. But it can mean something else because I'm using it in a different context. If you do not explain what you're talking about, any fool. You can make a comment. Created concept more convoluted, but it takes someone genuinely intelligent to break something down and make it simpler. So anytime you hear these commie bum types, these professor cummy bum types use words that are above 3 syllables that sound like they came out of a textbook and they don't define what they're talking about. They're using what I call sphinxes in syndrome. They are trying to use riddles and word games. To subvert your natural inclination to question what you hear because they're they're feigning, they're they're flexing their intelligence on you by not actually explaining what they're talking about. They're using very intelligent language, very convoluted, expressive language to basically. Try to convince you that I'm more intelligent than you. So you should listen to me, even though you don't know. What I'm talking about, let's keep. In the 40s, the 1840s that is in Britain, women organized riots, marches and went on strike. Let's see. Oh, they have built barricades, took up arms. Another telltale sign against kings. Emperors. All Paris. Yeah, we're talking about now the the French Revolution. OK. Where? Oh here it is. Here it is. Here it is. Here's what I was looking for. Today Marks and angles stand accused of preaching emancipation in public while acting like typical Victorian male. Come again convolution ists in private again, we are not defining what these words mean. And that is a red flag for anybody who's listening to the show. If they do not define what these words mean, then they are trying to flex their intelligence on you by not. Dumbing it down for you is the equivalent of what the Catholic Church did back in the day when the Bible was only in Latin and the only person who could tell you what the Bible said was the clergy. And that's why a lot of times people were like, wait, what the hell guys like Martin Luther, who learned Latin and became a monk. We're like, what are you talking about? This just doesn't make any sense. This is not what the Bible says. It creates the opportunity for exploitation when you do not understand what you are talking about. One biographer of Karl Marx writes for all his mockery of the bourgeoisie morals and manners. Marx was outwardly freely bourgeoisie. Patriarch, please. Like. Hold on a minute. Ohh in other words, now they're. They're they're picking them apart now. Where was the line about? I was hoping this article had this. I didn't read through all the way I was hoping this article had. Their. Saying about the woman being the proletarian and the man being the Blues was the and how the women needed to be liberated from the oppressive nature of marriage. Because marriage was built to oppress. Them, which is a total falsehood, but they believed it nonetheless, because of course, if you could be a victim, why the hell wouldn't you play the victim card if you can become a victim, perceived or realized that the illusion doesn't matter? It it's. Where is that? Do they not have this quote? In here I thought they would. I thought they would have. This quote about Marks and angles. Describing the marriage, the bourgeois marriage as the biggest problem in society and how they wanted to tear it. Down. And it was one of the biggest problems that they wanted to be exploited because they thought that women were being exploited by men. And then it was the Rockefellers who took this idea during the women's suffrage movement, paid for their signs, paid for the protesting organizations and everything, and an attempt to tax the other half of the population. And people are now figuring this out, by the way. Now people are figuring this out because they're seeing, wait a minute, this economy. Doesn't work for me. This economy is now I have to work back in the day when women didn't have to work, they could if they wanted, but they didn't have to work now, unless you're a guy making way above the average wage, you cannot even have the option. Of your wife being a stay at home mom and now you're stuck in the catch 22 of paying for childcare, which is exorbitant and through the roof, which prevents you from building wealth, ergo keeping you captive to the very system that marks an angle said was oppressive. You see how backwards this is, but again, This is why. Feminism has failed women because it tells them. But. Feminism is supposed to be freedom, and in that extent it's actually true. But it's supposed to free you from the things of normal society. For men, for example, for most men, men view feminism is bad. But you know what? I don't view feminism is bad for me personally, and you want to know why? Because I'm not willing to get married. I have no desire to live the traditional life than most men have LED throughout time. The reason why is because most men if not. All men stand to gain very little or nothing in the modern marriage. The problem is a lot of us think it's the right thing to do because we're pushing that to the society. Tells us that because obviously society benefits from us producing more little taxpayers, we call children and then they can tax them, tax US, tax everything. And then we pay for childcare. We vote for Socialists, we vote for universal Healthcare, which is not about helping you without giving the government more power over you and your treatment and everything else. But go right ahead. See, that's what it all comes down to is power money. And everything else. But the problem is people. Don't see it. And so they're willing to trade their freedom or security because people don't want to fail. They don't want to feel like they're at risk of losing stuff. So instead they'll trade their freedom that feminism supposed to give them both men and women, and they'll trade it for comfort. They'll trade it for security. There are women who make billions, if not billions of dollars. Most billionaires are most of female billionaires are not billionaires through self creation. They're billionaires through divorce, but we'll ignore that for two seconds. There are exceptions, but at the end of the day, the reason it's failed you is because you're using the wrong formula. It can work for you. How does this works for you? If you are not traditional? If you say, hey, you know what the system ain't working. I don't like this. I'm gonna go my own way and I'm gonna blaze my own trail. I'm not gonna try the old equation with the new variables because it doesn't work. That's why I wrote biblical bachelor cause I said, you know what? This ain't working for me. I'm not going to roll the dice and hope for a Yahtzee. It's not going to work. I'm not doing it now. You can if you want, but just know that unless you roll Yahtzee, your life's gonna be miserable. Either gonna get divorced or gonna get a sexless marriage or a an open marriage or whatever. I'm just telling you that statistics. And if you don't like it, feel free to ignore them. But just know. That's the statistics are there for a reason. But here's the main issue. People want to be happy. This all comes down to happiness, right? People want to feel happy. They want to feel fulfilled, right? Well, we're going to look, I've showed this clip on the show before, but there's this this video of on happiness that was put together by Steve cuts, great video. We're going to look at this. As he talks about happiness in the rat. Race. We're going to look at this and let me know what you think. Look familiar? Can we pause? I want to pause right away. Because it right away I wanna let I wanna say one thing. Just know. This video is supposed to be a representation of happiness, and I want you to really ask yourself how accurate or inaccurate do you think this actually is? OK let me know. Does this represent you your life? Will you see in society? Let's look at it. Let's keep going. Oh man. Look at all these things that they talk about. Happiness they got. We have the Nike reference. We have the Coca-Cola reference, we have the Starbucks reference and look at all these things. See all these things they're trying to make you feel happy. They're trying to get you to come back. They're trying to get you to consume. Consume, consume, consume. Tell me, is this all familiar yet? Being happy when you buy stuff. Yep, consumer culture. Black Friday? Yep. Fighting over junk that you don't care about? Yep. Oh man. Ohh, look at that. He got him. A whip. Yeah, the fancy car, the nice stuff. The luxury items. Yep, Yep, Yep. Oh no, not the no, no, not the bottle. Oh, no. Ohh not the not the Daniels. Ohh no. Ohh not the honey. Ohh no. Ohh no, not the prescription. Ohh no. No. Oh yeah, there, there. There's the prescription drugs. Ohh, Yep. There it is. But what goes up must come down. Oh no. Ohh it's too damn bad now he chasing the money. Look at him. Look him go. Oh, this is not going to hang up. Ohh no. 

Oh my God. 

Oh no. My friends, let me ask you, it's like a corn you a little bit. I hit you a little too close to. Home. Good. Get me a little close to home. I've been there before. Well, at the end of the day, this is what it all comes back to is we're sold this idea of happiness, but it's not something that we produce according to society. It's something that we have to consume and I'm here to tell you that's just false. The only way you can truly gain happiness in your life is if you act. Find out that most of the stuff you've been told is a complete fabrication at best and an absolute. Lie at worst. It's not an. Thing to accept, I get that. But you know what part of this dichotomy of liberation you have to free your own mind. You have to free yourself from the shackles that are placed upon you by the. Fighting and I know it's easy to blame society like it's some kind of invisible boogie man, but at the end of the day, my friends, we need to realize that most people they're not listening to this. They don't want to improve. They don't want to express this kind of unfortunate reality. They want to just be all good. They want to go with the flow and be as good social creature and a good cog inside of. Giant machine. And you know what, at the end of the day, that's what most people are fine with. They don't want to thrive. They just want to survive. And society is built for you to survive. I've told the story before, but what if my professors got really mad at me when I asked her this question? They were talking about public policy and I said. Professor, why is it that society seems to be set up in a way not? For the rich. To win, but for the poor not to lose. And she kind of looked at me for with a blank stare for a second. And she. Said, what are you talking about? And I said, well, it kind of seems like the government set up in such a way that I mean. Obviously the rich are going to win. You know, but it also seems like we don't let poor people actually go down bad because the government's going to protect them because they want their vote. And that's why they read quote, UN quote, redistribute the wealth because they know that if the four people actually realize that the people at the top, the top, don't actually care about them, then the whole system falls apart. And she like that. Do you like that? You got upset about. That. Which I don't normally see professors like I get upset, but Speaking of professors, you know, I tell you that story because we're going to go to this video and. It looks interesting. I don't know what they're going to. 

Say, but let's see is absolutely about taking something away from men. One child has 20 marbles and the other has 10 marbles. The child with 20 needs to give up five. 

So on the one hand, yes, equity requires the redistribution of wealth. 

Ohh no, I'm just looking at this guy and right away. Ohh no. Ohh this is going to. Be rough. See, I can make that ohh boy. 

Privilege and oppression are inextricably linked. If you want to eliminate oppression, you also have to eliminate privileges. 

What did I say earlier about not defining terms? What did I say about these pipes using more than three syllables to sound sophisticated, and they don't define a Dang thing so that you're kind of stuck just. Mesmerized by this flamboyant scientific, intelligent sounding language. And so you immediately trust them because you don't know what your their you don't know what they're saying, but you assume they know what they're saying because they're using words you don't understand. Ohh boy, let's go back. 

But feminism is also about giving something to men, giving us freedom. 

Listening. 

Freedom from the. 

OK. 

Limitations. The restrictions, the discipline the surveillance of traditional hegemonic masculinity. Freedom from the expectation that you'll be the sole breadwinner and provider for your. 

I'm listening, OK. OK. 

Freedom from the expectation that you will be tough, stoic, aggressive, and the freedom to be emotional and empathetic and kind without the perception that that means you're also weak. Watch Disney movies have platonic female friends. Be the stay at home Dad. 

You lost me. 

Oh my God. 

Wear pink. Does feminism demand that we lose something? Yes, we still come out ahead. 

Wow. Well this is getting weird. 

Ohh no. Ohh this guys a professor. Ohh no. 

Ohh hell no. 

Ohh my goodness. Ladies and gentlemen. I mean, I rushed my case, I mean. Let's just be totally frank here. Why is it that these types? What is it with the overall theme of using flamboyant colorful language? And words that people have heard but don't understand to then make it sound like you know more than them. They're dumb, so they need to listen to you. This idea of the intellectual the left wing intellectuals trying to run everything because any idiot can make something more complicated, but it takes someone with true comprehension to break something down into simplistic and understandable terms. But for some reason too many people, they don't do that. They don't use simple terms. They don't explain what they're talking about. But. Do I even want to try to interpret what this guy just said? Sure, why not? Let's go again. Let's go again. I'll. I'll. I'll interpret. We're going to skip past. 

Have 20 marbles and the other has 10 marbles. The child with 20 needs to give up five. 

Let's do this. 

So on the one hand, yes, equity required. 

The equity, what is equity? You didn't define equity people think they know what it means. They don't know what it means. Equity is the idea that people are supposed to have equal access. Well, no. Equality is equal. Access equity is like you're all supposed to be on the exact same level. Like they they mean equal opportunity. Is basically what they're saying. You need equal opportunity and equal access. That's what they're talking about. 

Requires the redistribution of wealth. 

Redistribution of wealth means are going to take from the guy who was more and give to the guy who was less merely because the guy has more and the other guy has less. Even though they're not giving the same amount to society, but we'll ignore that. Let's keep going. 

And privilege and oppression. 

Privilege and oppression. What does he mean by that privilege means. That you have an. Advantage and oppression means that you are being pushed down and they're not at all discussing whether or not this is linked to your choices. Your ancestors choices. We're taking choice and decisions out, and we're only putting in the results. 

And are inextricably linked. If you want to. 

Inextricably inextricable. Oh, well, I could even say that, inextricably, inextricably leaked. Ohh, that sound ridiculous. I can't even say that. No. In other words, they're saying that it's inextricably linked, like, in other words, they're saying that they're tied together. 

We eliminate oppression. You also have to eliminate privileges. 

Again, what it. Oh, I can't. I I can't. I can't do this. This is the this is the type of garbage that gets me so angry. Why do they have to use these terms that people don't understand and are not going to take the time to look up. And they know it. Which is why they're doing it, because if they knew that people would actually look it up, they wouldn't use those terms. They'd use simple, very easy to understand language, but they don't because they know that people will just think ohh he used more than two syllables. Oh my God, he must be so smart. I've had enough of this. I I mean my point. Ladies and gentlemen of the of the show of the ship, Get your podcast. I'll. I'll leave it to you to decide what you think at the end of the day. Because what you think is really what matters. Do you think I'm right? Do you think I'm wrong? Fair foul. I'll let you decide. You can leave it in the comments. You can leave it on my ex page at Sheep gets shared if you want to go over there and leave a comment on any of my posts, you're welcome to do it all my friends. I encourage you to question everything you heard today, because I know I don't always. I'm not always correct about everything. I don't pretend to be. But I give you my raw reactions and I give you my opinion. Is 1 man's opinion. One man's musings of the world in which he finds himself my friends, mean time. Please be careful out here. This world's crazy. I really hope that doesn't jog you down, but I look forward to sitting on next time I'm out of here. Take care of yourselves. Peace.