1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:03,280
Well, let's pick off where we left and record some more sessions.

2
00:00:04,880 --> 00:00:13,920
Yeah, I think I'm not sure where we left off, but I'd like to talk about non-arguable goals.

3
00:00:14,720 --> 00:00:21,120
And if possible, MoCA, which is a form of communication. Are you familiar with non-arguable

4
00:00:21,120 --> 00:00:28,160
goals? Yeah, I think you mentioned that last time, but. Did I? Yeah. So I mean, a non-arguable goal

5
00:00:28,160 --> 00:00:32,480
is actually literally something that someone wouldn't argue about. And my favorite example is

6
00:00:34,240 --> 00:00:40,400
Paul O'Neill of Alcoa saying that their non-arguable goal is going to be employee safety.

7
00:00:40,400 --> 00:00:47,840
And the non-arguable piece was like he asked the shareholders, look, if anybody wants to lose an

8
00:00:47,840 --> 00:00:54,000
arm working at Alcoa factory, raise your hand and we'll take that arm. Right. So like, who's going

9
00:00:54,000 --> 00:01:02,320
to argue against that or for that? And, you know, and he also said at the same time, or sometime

10
00:01:02,320 --> 00:01:08,560
during that process, anyone who comes to me with a proposal where our company is going to make a

11
00:01:08,560 --> 00:01:14,480
lot of money by sacrificing the health and safety of our employees or our stakeholders, just

12
00:01:14,480 --> 00:01:23,920
shareholders, that person's going to get fired. Right. So a non-arguable goal is often unattainable.

13
00:01:23,920 --> 00:01:35,360
So zero worker days lost to illness or death or just somebody calling in sick when they're not well,

14
00:01:35,360 --> 00:01:39,040
or when they are well, sorry, like they said, they have a vision problem. I can't see myself

15
00:01:39,040 --> 00:01:46,640
coming to work today. That's not attainable. Someone's going to get sick. Someone is going

16
00:01:46,640 --> 00:01:52,160
to get hurt. The goal is like, you need to have zero. You don't want to say, well, it's okay if

17
00:01:52,160 --> 00:01:59,760
1% of our employees get hurt this year. That's not a reasonable thing to say. If it's you, if you say,

18
00:01:59,760 --> 00:02:08,000
okay, well, I'm volunteering. I'll be the one who gets hurt. Different story, right? So non-arguable

19
00:02:08,000 --> 00:02:15,120
goals, I think are highly effective at galvanizing activity in an organization. And they have

20
00:02:15,680 --> 00:02:21,520
far reaching effects across organizations beyond the stated purpose of that goal. And that, once

21
00:02:21,520 --> 00:02:27,600
again, that other one's a really good example. What Paul O'Neill knew at that time that no one

22
00:02:27,600 --> 00:02:35,920
else was paying attention to is that there are a lot of ways that worker safety permeates other

23
00:02:35,920 --> 00:02:42,400
pieces of culture that are important inside the organization. For instance, it's actually very

24
00:02:42,400 --> 00:02:48,880
expensive and anti-efficient to have people call in sick. And certainly it's very expensive to have

25
00:02:48,880 --> 00:02:55,280
somebody get their arm taken off and then end up in a lawsuit. It's time consuming, right? It's

26
00:02:55,280 --> 00:03:04,160
unethical as well. And so it actually was driving organizational excellence across the organization

27
00:03:04,160 --> 00:03:12,320
in a lot of different ways. And you can measure the culture, the positive or negative culture

28
00:03:12,320 --> 00:03:22,480
in an organization by worker days lost to employees calling in sick. So he knew that.

29
00:03:22,480 --> 00:03:26,640
And he knew that it would have an effect on the bottom line. And he also knew that when he

30
00:03:26,640 --> 00:03:34,000
made it clear to everybody that the employees were really important and their health and safety was

31
00:03:34,000 --> 00:03:39,120
really important, that that would translate and transmit itself to the customers as well.

32
00:03:39,840 --> 00:03:47,280
Quality of products would go up, quality of ideas would go up, all of that. So at the

33
00:03:47,280 --> 00:03:52,560
Globally Conscious Leader, we have invented a non-arguable goal called zero unmeasured

34
00:03:52,560 --> 00:03:57,440
externalities. And are you familiar, Harry, with the term externalities?

35
00:03:58,080 --> 00:03:58,800
I am not.

36
00:03:58,800 --> 00:04:05,040
It was actually coined in the late 1800s and it was made famous in the 1920s by an economist.

37
00:04:05,840 --> 00:04:12,400
And it was the first time someone said, okay, here's an externality. And what an externality is,

38
00:04:13,280 --> 00:04:21,760
is an effect that your action or someone's action has on someone else that is they don't

39
00:04:21,760 --> 00:04:29,680
know about and is unintended to them. It might be intended to you, like I'm going to pour this barrel

40
00:04:29,680 --> 00:04:35,840
of toxic chemicals into the river knowing that it causes cancer. That's intentional, right?

41
00:04:36,240 --> 00:04:40,000
But you've created an externality for somebody's granddaughter living downstream.

42
00:04:40,560 --> 00:04:44,000
They don't know the water's toxic. They don't know they're going to get cancer, all those things.

43
00:04:44,000 --> 00:04:51,760
Those are externalities. And I'm forgetting the name of the guy who coined it, but the idea was

44
00:04:51,760 --> 00:04:57,760
you need to know what your externalities are from business. Because we all know there are

45
00:04:57,760 --> 00:05:02,640
certain externalities to some activities. For instance, if you sell heroin to school children

46
00:05:02,640 --> 00:05:08,400
at the schoolyard, you're going to end up with a bunch of heroin addicts, right? We don't

47
00:05:08,400 --> 00:05:14,960
legalize selling drugs to children because we know it's bad. It has externalities all the way across

48
00:05:14,960 --> 00:05:22,400
society. And as a business, every business owner has externalities. And a business owner's job

49
00:05:23,040 --> 00:05:29,040
is to know more and more externalities, to take them outside, external, and bring them inside.

50
00:05:29,040 --> 00:05:37,680
And I use the term externalities a little more loosely, maybe a lot more loosely than most people

51
00:05:37,680 --> 00:05:43,920
do. I think it's important that we understand the original intention of externalities as business

52
00:05:43,920 --> 00:05:50,480
people because it helps us define our stakeholders, not just shareholders. Because our

53
00:05:50,480 --> 00:05:55,440
stakeholders are anyone that we're going to have an effect on, plainly spoken. And then you can name

54
00:05:55,440 --> 00:06:00,720
as many as you want. It's how we ended up going from a bottom line to a dribble bottom line to a

55
00:06:00,720 --> 00:06:08,240
quadruple bottom line, quintuple, there's so many, you can keep going. So with zero unmeasured

56
00:06:08,240 --> 00:06:13,440
externalities, you're saying we don't want to live in a world where we don't know all the

57
00:06:13,440 --> 00:06:18,480
effects that our activities are having on people around us. Whether they're our consumers,

58
00:06:18,480 --> 00:06:24,800
there are partners, there are partners, employees, the granddaughters of our partners, employees,

59
00:06:24,800 --> 00:06:29,520
our granddaughters, all of that. So does that make sense, Harry?

60
00:06:30,400 --> 00:06:32,080
It kind of does. Tell me more about that.

61
00:06:33,360 --> 00:06:38,560
Well, as part of the core values of the globally conscious leader, what we're trying to teach

62
00:06:38,560 --> 00:06:45,760
people, we're trying to set a bar of core values around ethics. And that's what we're trying to

63
00:06:45,760 --> 00:06:51,280
teach people. A bar of core values around ethics that basically says, don't do something to

64
00:06:51,280 --> 00:06:55,680
someone else's granddaughter that you wouldn't do to your own granddaughter. Granddaughters are

65
00:06:55,680 --> 00:07:06,240
precious. Everyone else is precious too. But that's the concept. So our relationships and

66
00:07:06,240 --> 00:07:13,040
business are important and how you run your business is important. And what we're saying is,

67
00:07:13,040 --> 00:07:18,320
if you take into account your granddaughter, which I think everybody does, we're using that

68
00:07:18,320 --> 00:07:23,760
as a way to cross, call it political and global boundaries and social boundaries, because this

69
00:07:23,760 --> 00:07:32,400
isn't a political issue. This is a personal issue. If you are running a factory in a town

70
00:07:32,400 --> 00:07:37,600
and you're pouring chemicals into a river and it's upstream from anybody, but we're saying it's

71
00:07:37,600 --> 00:07:41,680
your granddaughter, you shouldn't be doing that. So why would you be in a relationship with someone

72
00:07:41,680 --> 00:07:48,000
in another country where they have maybe a different set of rules or that person is breaking

73
00:07:48,000 --> 00:07:52,000
those rules that you're partnered with and they're doing the same? We're saying you wouldn't.

74
00:07:53,440 --> 00:08:01,600
This is where the globally conscious leader piece comes in. It's our job as business owners,

75
00:08:01,600 --> 00:08:08,560
as entrepreneurs, as executives, as the janitor, a middle manager, an employee,

76
00:08:08,560 --> 00:08:15,200
to hold up a set of ethics that says it's not just about money. It's about leadership. It's

77
00:08:15,200 --> 00:08:23,440
about doing the right thing. And we believe that businesses are uniquely suited to have a huge

78
00:08:23,440 --> 00:08:28,000
effect on this. We're not saying that everybody's dumping chemicals. I'm using hyperbolic examples.

79
00:08:28,000 --> 00:08:37,280
But we produce stuff. We take stuff out of the ground or we pay someone who pays someone who

80
00:08:37,280 --> 00:08:41,440
pays someone who pays someone to take it out of the ground and turn it into something else.

81
00:08:42,080 --> 00:08:50,960
And then we sell it. And there is a limit to the number of resources that we have on this planet

82
00:08:50,960 --> 00:08:55,920
and we need to figure out how to use them. And businesses, I think we have a responsibility

83
00:08:55,920 --> 00:09:04,240
to do that in a responsible, globally ethical fashion. Thank you for sharing that. I want to

84
00:09:04,240 --> 00:09:13,840
go along with what you just shared. The real question for you, Steve, is that I want to ask

85
00:09:13,840 --> 00:09:22,480
is what is the story behind this non-arguable goals that you set up? Why go along this path?

86
00:09:24,480 --> 00:09:33,040
Why did you start all this, essentially? Yeah. Well, great question, Harry. We started this

87
00:09:33,040 --> 00:09:38,880
John Leamy and I started the Globally Conscious Leader together. We did not come to this idea

88
00:09:38,880 --> 00:09:47,680
solely on our own, but we, along with lots of other, now I'm a consultant. I have a company

89
00:09:47,680 --> 00:09:54,480
that we call dotcom jungle. People hire us to build really big ERP integrations with

90
00:09:54,480 --> 00:09:59,840
large manufacturing retail websites and dealer portals and things like that. And I get hired

91
00:09:59,840 --> 00:10:07,680
for technology. And what I've learned over and over again is that there are often culture problems

92
00:10:08,320 --> 00:10:15,600
in organizations that are created by poor technology decisions. And more often than not,

93
00:10:15,600 --> 00:10:22,720
there's actually culture problems because a owner is like maybe some sort of fantastic person who

94
00:10:22,720 --> 00:10:27,760
invented something really cool with their hands. They went from making something with their hands

95
00:10:27,760 --> 00:10:33,760
to making, having teams of people make that thing with their hands. And as they've grown,

96
00:10:33,760 --> 00:10:39,520
they've made and sold a lot of stuff, but they maybe haven't transitioned from I know how to

97
00:10:39,520 --> 00:10:44,880
make something to I know how to lead people. I know how to find the right people to fit in an

98
00:10:44,880 --> 00:10:50,160
organization, fit in my organization, and I know how to treat them well and I'm not going to yell

99
00:10:50,160 --> 00:10:56,960
at them and make them feel like crap or whatever it is. So in my role as a leader, I've been

100
00:10:56,960 --> 00:11:02,000
in my role as a technology specialist is essentially a technical architect who can come in and look at

101
00:11:02,000 --> 00:11:10,560
all those systems. I often pretty much every time run into cultural problems. And they're

102
00:11:10,560 --> 00:11:18,720
usually systems problems that can be fixed with a better system or recognition of a new system,

103
00:11:19,280 --> 00:11:26,800
or they're cultural problems where something very pragmatic like a system or a way of talking can

104
00:11:26,800 --> 00:11:36,320
be applied. And the reason I'm saying this this way is in general, if you bring up this topic of

105
00:11:36,320 --> 00:11:42,240
having great culture and great systems and being efficient, like people are going to say it's really

106
00:11:42,240 --> 00:11:48,400
expensive. It's totally hard to do. You're like, you can't you can't do all of that. And I'm saying,

107
00:11:48,400 --> 00:11:57,440
okay, it is difficult to do. It's very hard to do. And it's also easy to start doing. And you don't

108
00:11:57,440 --> 00:12:04,800
have to have an MBA. You just have to have a couple of concepts, I think in mind and a couple of tools.

109
00:12:05,440 --> 00:12:14,080
And I've chosen a few. There are other tools out there that that work. I've chosen Mocha,

110
00:12:14,080 --> 00:12:19,520
which is a conversational framework. It was presented to me by Stephen Sloan, who is the

111
00:12:19,520 --> 00:12:26,400
founder of Humane Leadership Institute. It stands for motivation, opportunity, clarity, and ability.

112
00:12:26,400 --> 00:12:32,080
And I would challenge anybody who's listening to this to put that acronym on a post-it and just

113
00:12:32,080 --> 00:12:38,080
put it everywhere. Because I've never been in a situation, or maybe I should say rarely instead

114
00:12:38,080 --> 00:12:43,600
of being, you know, super hyperbolic about it, but I've rarely been in a situation in a business or

115
00:12:43,600 --> 00:12:54,720
conversation where I couldn't access Mocha in order to make the conversation better and to make

116
00:12:54,720 --> 00:13:01,200
the results of that conversation better in the future. Or to even assess, you know, call it a

117
00:13:01,200 --> 00:13:08,080
failure that has happened. I think it was Sig Siggler who said that failure is not a person,

118
00:13:08,080 --> 00:13:15,040
it's an event. And if you approach a failure, whether it feels like a personal failure or it

119
00:13:15,040 --> 00:13:21,840
feels like a systemic failure or an organizational failure, from the perspective of Mocha,

120
00:13:23,040 --> 00:13:31,520
you can sort of say, okay, who would be accountable for this? Right? And you can Mocha a company.

121
00:13:32,480 --> 00:13:38,000
You can say, I used to own an outdoor store and I actually sat my entire staff down and I said,

122
00:13:38,000 --> 00:13:43,440
like, I want you guys to take the next 24 hours, you get like a half hour break each day to do this.

123
00:13:43,440 --> 00:13:48,720
I gave them the opportunity, part of the O, schedule it in. I want you to sort of Mocha the

124
00:13:48,720 --> 00:13:54,320
company. Are we motivated to do what we're doing? What are we doing? Do we have clarity? You know,

125
00:13:54,320 --> 00:13:59,120
do we know how to do it? Do we have the ability? That's the A. And are we giving ourselves the

126
00:13:59,120 --> 00:14:05,920
opportunity? And it was a very interesting exercise because, you know, I learned that

127
00:14:05,920 --> 00:14:09,680
everybody's individually motivated and they felt like the store was motivated. But then we found

128
00:14:09,680 --> 00:14:14,640
some places where maybe we weren't giving ourselves the opportunity to be as successful as we wanted

129
00:14:14,640 --> 00:14:23,040
to be. You know, so I basically elicited very good, pragmatic business development ideas from

130
00:14:23,600 --> 00:14:27,360
a group of people that I believe most other people would say they're just employees. I don't need to

131
00:14:27,360 --> 00:14:32,000
listen to them. Thank you for being here today. I'm really happy that you tuned into Vision Pros

132
00:14:32,000 --> 00:14:37,440
Live. I'm looking forward to seeing your reactions as these episodes continue to move forward. This

133
00:14:37,440 --> 00:14:41,360
is going to get more and more fun. We'll have more and more engagement as well. We'll invite

134
00:14:41,360 --> 00:14:45,360
people to participate in the show and thank you for giving us your time and attention.

135
00:14:45,360 --> 00:15:02,160
Have an excellent time building out your vision and becoming a Vision Pro yourself.

