1
00:02:30,000 --> 00:02:32,000
Yeah, you're right.

2
00:02:32,000 --> 00:02:34,000
Have you got your own?

3
00:02:34,000 --> 00:02:35,000
I have a plan.

4
00:02:35,000 --> 00:02:37,500
Yeah.

5
00:02:37,500 --> 00:02:39,000
It's supposed to be yesterday.

6
00:02:39,000 --> 00:02:45,000
And we're trying really hard to get it in there.

7
00:02:45,000 --> 00:02:46,000
No luck.

8
00:02:46,000 --> 00:02:47,000
No luck.

9
00:02:47,000 --> 00:02:49,000
It's full.

10
00:02:49,000 --> 00:03:01,000
Yeah.

11
00:03:19,000 --> 00:03:42,000
Yeah.

12
00:03:42,000 --> 00:03:55,000
Yeah.

13
00:03:55,000 --> 00:04:23,000
Yeah.

14
00:04:23,000 --> 00:04:50,000
Yeah.

15
00:04:50,000 --> 00:05:15,000
Yeah.

16
00:05:15,000 --> 00:05:22,000
Yeah.

17
00:05:45,000 --> 00:05:48,000
Yeah.

18
00:06:15,000 --> 00:06:18,000
Yeah.

19
00:06:45,000 --> 00:07:10,000
Yeah.

20
00:07:10,000 --> 00:07:29,000
Yeah.

21
00:07:40,000 --> 00:08:05,000
Yeah.

22
00:08:05,000 --> 00:08:33,000
Yeah.

23
00:08:33,000 --> 00:08:55,000
Yeah.

24
00:08:55,000 --> 00:09:17,000
Yeah.

25
00:09:17,000 --> 00:09:32,000
Yeah.

26
00:09:32,000 --> 00:09:54,000
Yeah.

27
00:09:54,000 --> 00:10:09,000
Yeah.

28
00:10:09,000 --> 00:10:24,000
Yeah.

29
00:10:24,000 --> 00:10:49,000
Yeah.

30
00:10:49,000 --> 00:10:50,000
All right.

31
00:10:50,000 --> 00:10:51,000
Good morning, everyone.

32
00:10:51,000 --> 00:10:52,000
Thank you.

33
00:10:52,000 --> 00:10:55,000
I'm Mark.

34
00:10:55,000 --> 00:10:59,000
I'm from Landisrath and Cobb on behalf of FTX Trading Limited and its

35
00:10:59,000 --> 00:11:01,000
affiliated debtors.

36
00:11:01,000 --> 00:11:04,000
Your honor, we're here today with two agendas.

37
00:11:04,000 --> 00:11:08,000
I don't know if the Latin for that is agendum, but we're here with two agendas.

38
00:11:08,000 --> 00:11:12,000
One in the FTX Trading Limited case and one in the FTX Digital Markets case.

39
00:11:12,000 --> 00:11:16,000
Nothing is contested, your honor.

40
00:11:16,000 --> 00:11:19,000
On either agenda.

41
00:11:19,000 --> 00:11:21,000
two-fifth of a

42
00:11:19,000 --> 00:11:22,160
We have a

43
00:11:21,000 --> 00:11:23,000
FTP

44
00:11:23,000 --> 00:11:27,000
FTX Trading agenda and we've spoken with counsel to the joint

45
00:11:27,000 --> 00:11:28,000
prohibition of liquidators.

46
00:11:28,000 --> 00:11:32,000
We thought we would go forward with the FTX Trading Chapter 11 agenda first.

47
00:11:32,000 --> 00:11:35,000
We filed a second amended agenda last night,

48
00:11:35,000 --> 00:11:39,000
noting that the committee had filed certifications of

49
00:11:39,000 --> 00:11:43,000
certificates of counsel with respect to the professional

50
00:11:43,000 --> 00:11:49,000
attorney. I note that I think as we were standing here this morning, your

51
00:11:49,000 --> 00:11:51,000
honor, has signed the orders.

52
00:11:51,000 --> 00:11:52,000
Yes.

53
00:11:52,000 --> 00:11:53,000
They've done it.

54
00:11:53,000 --> 00:11:54,000
For FTI and Jeffries.

55
00:11:54,000 --> 00:11:58,000
So they really made, unless your honor has questions, we'd just like anything on the

56
00:11:58,000 --> 00:11:59,000
agenda.

57
00:11:59,000 --> 00:12:03,000
We believe we can move right to item number six, which is the court's ruling with

58
00:12:03,000 --> 00:12:07,000
respect to the United States trustees motion to appoint an examiner.

59
00:12:07,000 --> 00:12:08,000
Okay.

60
00:12:08,000 --> 00:12:18,000
So we can go ahead.

61
00:12:18,000 --> 00:12:19,000
All right.

62
00:12:19,000 --> 00:12:22,000
So this is the ruling on the motion to appoint an examiner.

63
00:12:22,000 --> 00:12:26,000
The United States trustee moved for the appointment of an examiner in these

64
00:12:26,000 --> 00:12:32,000
cases pursuant to section 1104 C1 and C2 of the bankruptcy code.

65
00:12:32,000 --> 00:12:37,000
Section 1104 provides that if a Chapter 11 trustee is not appointed in a case,

66
00:12:37,000 --> 00:12:41,000
that at any time prior to confirmation of a plan, quote,

67
00:12:41,000 --> 00:12:44,000
on request of a party in interest or the United States trustee,

68
00:12:44,000 --> 00:12:46,000
and after notice in a hearing,

69
00:12:46,000 --> 00:12:49,000
the court shall appoint an examiner to conduct such an investigation of the

70
00:12:49,000 --> 00:12:53,000
debtor as is appropriate, including an investigation of allegations of fraud,

71
00:12:53,000 --> 00:12:57,000
dishonesty, incompetence, misconduct, mismanagement,

72
00:12:57,000 --> 00:13:00,000
or irregularity in the management of the debtor,

73
00:13:00,000 --> 00:13:05,000
if one, such appointment is in the interest of the creditors and any equity

74
00:13:05,000 --> 00:13:09,000
security holders and interests and other interests of the estate,

75
00:13:09,000 --> 00:13:12,000
or two, the debtor's fixed liquidated unsecured debts,

76
00:13:12,000 --> 00:13:14,000
other than debts for goods, services,

77
00:13:14,000 --> 00:13:19,000
or taxes or owing to an insider exceed $5 million.

78
00:13:19,000 --> 00:13:23,000
The trustee joined by several state regulatory authorities argues that

79
00:13:23,000 --> 00:13:26,000
because there are allegations of massive fraud alleged against the debtors,

80
00:13:26,000 --> 00:13:27,000
pre-petition management,

81
00:13:27,000 --> 00:13:32,000
the appointment of an examiner in is in the best interest of the creditors,

82
00:13:32,000 --> 00:13:36,000
creditors, and other interest holders under 1104C1.

83
00:13:36,000 --> 00:13:42,000
The trustee also argues that even if I conclude the requirements of 1104C1 have

84
00:13:42,000 --> 00:13:43,000
not been met,

85
00:13:43,000 --> 00:13:48,000
I am required to appoint an examiner under 1104C2 because three of the

86
00:13:48,000 --> 00:13:51,000
debtors meet the debt threshold,

87
00:13:51,000 --> 00:13:54,000
or the debtors do not, for the purposes of this motion,

88
00:13:54,000 --> 00:13:59,000
contest the debt limit with regard to the remaining debtors.

89
00:13:59,000 --> 00:14:02,000
The debtors, the committee of general unsecured creditors,

90
00:14:02,000 --> 00:14:05,000
and the joint provisional liquidators of FTX Digital Markets Limited,

91
00:14:05,000 --> 00:14:09,000
appointed in the provisional liquidation proceeding pending in the Bahamas,

92
00:14:09,000 --> 00:14:11,000
object to the appointment of an examiner,

93
00:14:11,000 --> 00:14:15,000
arguing that given the investigations being conducted by the debtors and the

94
00:14:15,000 --> 00:14:18,000
committee as well as various federal law enforcement and regulatory agencies,

95
00:14:18,000 --> 00:14:21,000
there is no need to appoint an examiner to conduct yet another costly

96
00:14:21,000 --> 00:14:25,000
investigation that would slow the progress of these cases.

97
00:14:25,000 --> 00:14:30,000
Moreover, the objectors argue that contrary to the trustee's position,

98
00:14:30,000 --> 00:14:33,000
appointment of an examiner is not mandatory under 1104C2,

99
00:14:33,000 --> 00:14:37,000
even if the debt threshold is met.

100
00:14:37,000 --> 00:14:41,000
For the reasons I will explain, I agree with the objectors and will deny the

101
00:14:41,000 --> 00:14:44,000
motion to appoint an examiner.

102
00:14:44,000 --> 00:14:50,000
These cases have been described as unique, unusual, highly complex,

103
00:14:50,000 --> 00:14:53,000
and unprecedented, and just a few of the adjectives applied to them,

104
00:14:53,000 --> 00:14:56,000
and they have certainly lived up to that billing.

105
00:14:56,000 --> 00:15:01,000
A multi-billion dollar company built over the course of just a few years,

106
00:15:01,000 --> 00:15:04,000
a spectacular crash with billions worth of assets missing,

107
00:15:04,000 --> 00:15:10,000
allegations of gross mismanagement and massive fraud leading to criminal

108
00:15:10,000 --> 00:15:14,000
indictments and investigations by numerous federal agencies.

109
00:15:14,000 --> 00:15:18,000
Behind that backdrop sit the creditors and the customers of the debtors,

110
00:15:18,000 --> 00:15:21,000
individuals and entities that trusted the management of the company with their

111
00:15:21,000 --> 00:15:24,000
relatively new type of asset, cryptocurrency,

112
00:15:24,000 --> 00:15:28,000
as well as those who did business with the debtors on a day-to-day basis.

113
00:15:28,000 --> 00:15:33,000
This case is about making sure that those parties get back as much value as

114
00:15:33,000 --> 00:15:36,000
possible from the debtors' estates.

115
00:15:36,000 --> 00:15:39,000
That process began immediately prior to the filing of these cases with the

116
00:15:39,000 --> 00:15:43,000
appointment of Mr. Ray as the new CEO of the debtors.

117
00:15:43,000 --> 00:15:46,000
Although appointed by the previous CEO, Mr. Benjamin Fried,

118
00:15:46,000 --> 00:15:49,000
who is currently under federal indictment,

119
00:15:49,000 --> 00:15:52,000
there is no question that Mr. Ray is completely independent of prior

120
00:15:52,000 --> 00:15:55,000
management and the companies he was appointed to lead.

121
00:15:55,000 --> 00:15:58,000
Mr. Ray is the consummate professional,

122
00:15:58,000 --> 00:16:02,000
highly qualified with decades of experience in taking control of companies

123
00:16:02,000 --> 00:16:05,000
in dire financial condition.

124
00:16:05,000 --> 00:16:09,000
Mr. Ray in turn appointed four independent directors to three silos of

125
00:16:09,000 --> 00:16:12,000
debtor entities to assist him in determining what happened,

126
00:16:12,000 --> 00:16:15,000
how to sort out the financial condition of the debtors,

127
00:16:15,000 --> 00:16:19,000
and how to return as much value as possible to creditors and customers.

128
00:16:19,000 --> 00:16:23,000
Each of the four directors are also highly qualified professionals with no

129
00:16:23,000 --> 00:16:26,000
prior connection with the debtors or the debtors' prior management.

130
00:16:26,000 --> 00:16:29,000
Mr. Ray also ensured that all prior senior management of the debtors were

131
00:16:29,000 --> 00:16:33,000
removed, two of whom have been indicted and pled guilty to various crimes

132
00:16:33,000 --> 00:16:37,000
involving the management of the debtors.

133
00:16:37,000 --> 00:16:40,000
Although some prior officers of the debtors remain in place,

134
00:16:40,000 --> 00:16:43,000
there is no indication they were involved in any wrongdoing,

135
00:16:43,000 --> 00:16:47,000
and according to Mr. Ray, all have been stripped of any decision-making authority.

136
00:16:47,000 --> 00:16:51,000
Mr. Ray has also retained a group of highly qualified experts to assist the

137
00:16:51,000 --> 00:16:54,000
sorting through the debtors' poorly maintained records.

138
00:16:54,000 --> 00:16:57,000
In many instances, records don't exist at all because the record-keeping was

139
00:16:57,000 --> 00:16:59,000
neglected by prior management.

140
00:16:59,000 --> 00:17:02,000
Mr. Ray testified that those experts, among other things,

141
00:17:02,000 --> 00:17:05,000
are accessing the debtors' extremely vulnerable electronic information

142
00:17:05,000 --> 00:17:09,000
containing cryptoassets that have already suffered hacking incidents both

143
00:17:09,000 --> 00:17:13,000
during and post-petition before controls could be restored.

144
00:17:13,000 --> 00:17:16,000
Those hacks resulted in the possible loss of hundreds of millions,

145
00:17:16,000 --> 00:17:19,000
if not billions, of dollars worth of cryptoassets.

146
00:17:19,000 --> 00:17:22,000
He further testified that he has been informed by those experts that giving

147
00:17:22,000 --> 00:17:25,000
additional persons access to the data creates the risk of further inadvertent

148
00:17:25,000 --> 00:17:30,000
disclosure or hacking of information that could lead to additional losses.

149
00:17:30,000 --> 00:17:34,000
Indeed, even committee counsel indicated that while they are working closely

150
00:17:34,000 --> 00:17:37,000
with the debtors in conducting investigations into what happened,

151
00:17:37,000 --> 00:17:43,000
the committee is not requesting direct access to the debtors' data due to those risks.

152
00:17:43,000 --> 00:17:47,000
There's no question that an examiner or a Chapter 11 trustee, for that matter,

153
00:17:47,000 --> 00:17:51,000
appointed pursuant to Section 1104, would have the same attributes as Mr. Ray

154
00:17:51,000 --> 00:17:53,000
and the independent directors.

155
00:17:53,000 --> 00:17:57,000
That person would be independent with no connection to the debtors or the

156
00:17:57,000 --> 00:17:59,000
debtors' prior management.

157
00:17:59,000 --> 00:18:03,000
That person would need to be qualified and would need to be as qualified and as

158
00:18:03,000 --> 00:18:07,000
experienced as Mr. Ray, and that person would retain qualified and experienced

159
00:18:07,000 --> 00:18:10,000
professionals to assist with the investigation.

160
00:18:10,000 --> 00:18:13,000
There's no question that if an examiner was appointed here, the cost of the

161
00:18:13,000 --> 00:18:17,000
examination, given the scope suggested by the trustee at the hearing,

162
00:18:17,000 --> 00:18:22,000
would be in the tens of millions of dollars and would likely exceed $100 million.

163
00:18:22,000 --> 00:18:25,000
Contrary to the suggestion of the trustee, the debtors in the committee could not

164
00:18:25,000 --> 00:18:30,000
merely sit idly by while the months-long investigation unfolded, leading to

165
00:18:30,000 --> 00:18:35,000
exponential costs to the estate, which would have to be borne by the creditors.

166
00:18:35,000 --> 00:18:38,000
While the debtors may ultimately have billions of dollars' worth of assets to

167
00:18:38,000 --> 00:18:41,000
distribute, creditors will likely not come close to recovering the full amount of

168
00:18:41,000 --> 00:18:44,000
their losses, and it may take some time to recover anything as the debtors in the

169
00:18:44,000 --> 00:18:49,000
committee work to claw back as much of the assets as possible.

170
00:18:49,000 --> 00:18:53,000
Given the facts and circumstances of this highly unique case, I have no doubt that

171
00:18:53,000 --> 00:18:57,000
the appointment of an examiner would not be in the best interest of the creditors.

172
00:18:57,000 --> 00:19:01,000
There are already multiple investigations underway by incredibly competent and

173
00:19:01,000 --> 00:19:04,000
independent parties. Requiring creditors to bear the burden of yet another

174
00:19:04,000 --> 00:19:09,000
investigation does not comport with the requirements of Section 1104C1 or the

175
00:19:09,000 --> 00:19:13,000
general scheme of the bankruptcy code, that is, to maximize recovery to creditors.

176
00:19:13,000 --> 00:19:17,000
It is important to keep in mind that while we talk about the cost of an

177
00:19:17,000 --> 00:19:20,000
investigation being borne by the debtors, we are actually talking about the cost

178
00:19:20,000 --> 00:19:25,000
being borne by the creditors. Every dollar spent in these cases on

179
00:19:25,000 --> 00:19:30,000
administrative expenses is a dollar less to the creditors. Therefore, I will deny

180
00:19:30,000 --> 00:19:35,000
the request to appoint an examiner under 1104C1.

181
00:19:35,000 --> 00:19:39,000
I should have brought some water with me.

182
00:19:39,000 --> 00:19:44,000
The trustee argues, however, that even if I conclude that the appointment of an

183
00:19:44,000 --> 00:19:48,000
examiner is not in the best interest of the creditors, I am still obligated to

184
00:19:48,000 --> 00:19:54,000
appoint one as mandated by Section 1104C2 because the debtors met the burden, met

185
00:19:54,000 --> 00:19:57,000
the debt threshold, or at least did not contest that they do for purposes of this

186
00:19:57,000 --> 00:20:01,000
motion. Even the trustee concedes, however, that a bankruptcy court has some

187
00:20:01,000 --> 00:20:07,000
discretion in determining whether or not an examiner must be appointed under 1104C2.

188
00:20:07,000 --> 00:20:11,000
For example, for a motion to appoint an examiner as being used by a creditor to

189
00:20:11,000 --> 00:20:15,000
obtain an advantage in plan negotiations. In other words, the trustee agrees there

190
00:20:15,000 --> 00:20:21,000
are times when the appointment of an examiner would not be appropriate under 1104C2.

191
00:20:21,000 --> 00:20:25,000
To be sure, there is a split of authority over whether 1104C2 leaves any discretion

192
00:20:25,000 --> 00:20:30,000
on the appointment of an examiner. Courts that hold there is no discretion

193
00:20:30,000 --> 00:20:34,000
concentrate on the language in 1104 that states, quote, the court shall appoint an

194
00:20:34,000 --> 00:20:38,000
examiner with emphasis on shall, if the debtor meets the debt requirements of

195
00:20:38,000 --> 00:20:43,000
Section C2. Those courts either ignore the additional language of 1104 that

196
00:20:43,000 --> 00:20:47,000
states, quote, to conduct such an investigation of the debtors as is

197
00:20:47,000 --> 00:20:51,000
appropriate, close quote, or conclude that the language only means the court can

198
00:20:51,000 --> 00:20:55,000
direct the scope and nature of an examination after an examiner is

199
00:20:55,000 --> 00:21:04,000
appointed. For example, see In re revco, 898F2nd, 498 at 501, Sixth Circuit, 1990.

200
00:21:04,000 --> 00:21:10,000
Court held appointment is mandatory, but, quote, the bankruptcy court retains broad

201
00:21:10,000 --> 00:21:14,000
discretion to direct the examiner's investigation, including its nature,

202
00:21:14,000 --> 00:21:18,000
extent, and duration, close quote. The Sixth Circuit is the only circuit court of

203
00:21:18,000 --> 00:21:22,000
appeals to consider the issue. Other courts have concluded that the as

204
00:21:22,000 --> 00:21:26,000
appropriate language in 1104C permits a bankruptcy court to deny the

205
00:21:26,000 --> 00:21:30,000
appointment of an examiner in limited circumstances, even if the debtor meets

206
00:21:30,000 --> 00:21:37,000
the debt requirements of C2. In, and examples are In re residential capital,

207
00:21:37,000 --> 00:21:45,000
LLC, 474, Bankruptcy Reporter 112, 117, Bankruptcy SDNY, 2012, In re Dewey and

208
00:21:45,000 --> 00:21:54,000
LeMouffe, 478, BR, 627, 629, Bankruptcy SDNY, 2012, In re shelter resources,

209
00:21:54,000 --> 00:22:00,000
35, BR, 304, thank you very much, 304, 305, Bankruptcy Northern District of

210
00:22:00,000 --> 00:22:11,000
Ohio, 1983, In re Gilman services, 46, BR, 322, 327, Bankruptcy,

211
00:22:11,000 --> 00:22:16,000
District of Massachusetts, 1985, In re Erickson retirement communities, LLC,

212
00:22:16,000 --> 00:22:23,000
425, BR, 309, at 312, Bankruptcy Northern District of Texas, 2010, In re GHR

213
00:22:23,000 --> 00:22:31,000
companies, Inc, 43, BR, 165, 170, Bankruptcy, District of Massachusetts, 1984,

214
00:22:31,000 --> 00:22:35,000
Indeed every bankruptcy judge in this district to consider the issue has

215
00:22:35,000 --> 00:22:43,000
concluded that there is discretion. See In re SA Telecom, Inc, case number 97-2395-

216
00:22:43,000 --> 00:22:52,000
2401, Judge Walsh, March 27th, 1998, hearing transcript at 82, In re

217
00:22:52,000 --> 00:22:58,000
expansion, 426, BR, 114, 128, Bankruptcy, District of Delaware, 2010, Judge

218
00:22:58,000 --> 00:23:04,000
Shannon, decision, In re Vistion Corporation, number 09-11786, Judge

219
00:23:04,000 --> 00:23:10,000
Sanchi, decision, from May 12, 2010, hearing transcript at 170, In re

220
00:23:10,000 --> 00:23:16,000
Washington Mutual, Inc, case number 0812229, Judge Walrath, decision,

221
00:23:16,000 --> 00:23:21,000
Bankruptcy, District of Delaware, May 5, 2010, hearing transcript at 97, and

222
00:23:21,000 --> 00:23:28,000
two of my own prior cases, In re Cred, Inc, case number 20-12836, Bankruptcy,

223
00:23:28,000 --> 00:23:35,000
District of Delaware, December 12, 2020, hearing transcript at 95, In re

224
00:23:35,000 --> 00:23:43,000
Mollenkrat, PLC, case number 20-12522, November 22, 2021, hearing transcript

225
00:23:43,000 --> 00:23:50,000
38-46. As Judge Glenn posited the question in

226
00:23:50,000 --> 00:23:54,000
residential capital, quote, If the as is appropriate language provides such

227
00:23:54,000 --> 00:23:58,000
discretion with respect to the nature, extent, and duration of the

228
00:23:58,000 --> 00:24:01,000
investigation, then why doesn't the same language provide discretion to just

229
00:24:01,000 --> 00:24:05,000
say no to an examiner investigation where it may not be justified on the

230
00:24:05,000 --> 00:24:11,000
particular facts and circumstances of the case? 474, BR, 118. As the

231
00:24:11,000 --> 00:24:15,000
trustee pointed out during argument, ultimately Judge Glenn did appoint an

232
00:24:15,000 --> 00:24:18,000
examiner in residential capital because, one, no plan had been confirmed, two,

233
00:24:18,000 --> 00:24:22,000
no trustee had been appointed, three, the debtor had fixed debt succeeding

234
00:24:22,000 --> 00:24:26,000
five million, and four, an investigation was appropriate and an investigation

235
00:24:26,000 --> 00:24:29,000
by the committee had just begun. The first three elements of this analysis

236
00:24:29,000 --> 00:24:33,000
are certainly present here, but while one could argue the fourth is also met

237
00:24:33,000 --> 00:24:36,000
because the debtors and the committee are in the early stages of their

238
00:24:36,000 --> 00:24:40,000
investigations, the facts present here are fundamentally different than in

239
00:24:40,000 --> 00:24:47,000
residential capital.

240
00:24:47,000 --> 00:24:50,000
First, Judge Glenn recognized in residential capital that, quote, Other

241
00:24:50,000 --> 00:24:53,000
than the committee, there is currently no independent party with the ability

242
00:24:53,000 --> 00:24:57,000
and authority to fully investigate and analyze the transactions that issue.

243
00:24:57,000 --> 00:25:01,000
Judge Glenn emphasized the no independent party in that statement. By

244
00:25:01,000 --> 00:25:04,000
contrast, in this case, all the senior managers of the company accused of

245
00:25:04,000 --> 00:25:08,000
wrongdoing had been removed and replaced by extremely competent independent

246
00:25:08,000 --> 00:25:11,000
professionals led by Mr. Ray with the ability and authority to investigate all

247
00:25:11,000 --> 00:25:16,000
claims that might ultimately benefit the creditors in these cases. Moreover,

248
00:25:16,000 --> 00:25:21,000
as indicated before, all remaining employees and officers of the debtors,

249
00:25:21,000 --> 00:25:26,000
all remaining employees and officers of the debtors that have not been accused

250
00:25:26,000 --> 00:25:31,000
of wrongdoing have been, do not possess any decision-making authority. Mr. Ray

251
00:25:31,000 --> 00:25:34,000
has also retained professionals that are fully capable of conducting a

252
00:25:34,000 --> 00:25:38,000
thorough investigation.

253
00:25:38,000 --> 00:25:42,000
Second, as Judge Glenn recognized, an examiner investigation might not be

254
00:25:42,000 --> 00:25:45,000
appropriate when, among other things, the debtor's senior management has been

255
00:25:45,000 --> 00:25:51,000
indicted. 474 PR at 118, footnote 6. Here, of course, senior management has been

256
00:25:51,000 --> 00:25:55,000
indicted. Two have pled guilty and three and a third is scheduled for trial in

257
00:25:55,000 --> 00:25:59,000
October. Finally, the issues to be investigated in residential capital

258
00:25:59,000 --> 00:26:03,000
involved a, quote, complex constellation of pre- and post-bankruptcy transactions

259
00:26:03,000 --> 00:26:07,000
involving billions of dollars in transfers and financing among interested

260
00:26:07,000 --> 00:26:13,000
parties. The debt 115, note 3, emphasis on interested parties. In residential

261
00:26:13,000 --> 00:26:17,000
capital, the allegations were that transfers between the debtors and certain

262
00:26:17,000 --> 00:26:22,000
secured creditors benefited the secured creditors to the detriment of unsecured

263
00:26:22,000 --> 00:26:26,000
creditors. Here, there are no secured creditors. There are only unsecured

264
00:26:26,000 --> 00:26:31,000
creditors. Finally, the issues to be investigated in residential capital, no,

265
00:26:31,000 --> 00:26:35,000
excuse me. Moreover, while the transfers at issue in residential capital were

266
00:26:35,000 --> 00:26:40,000
clearly complex commercial transactions, there was no indication that accessing

267
00:26:40,000 --> 00:26:43,000
the debtor's financial information would create a risk of further harm to the

268
00:26:43,000 --> 00:26:47,000
debtors or their creditors. By contrast, the uncontroverted testimony during the

269
00:26:47,000 --> 00:26:51,000
hearing in this matter established that given the debtor's business and the

270
00:26:51,000 --> 00:26:55,000
vulnerability of the debtor's financial data, permitting additional parties'

271
00:26:55,000 --> 00:26:58,000
access to the financial information would create an increased risk of further

272
00:26:58,000 --> 00:27:03,000
loss through inadvertent disclosures or hacking. Therefore, I conclude that under

273
00:27:03,000 --> 00:27:06,000
the facts and circumstances of these cases, appointment of an examiner is not

274
00:27:06,000 --> 00:27:11,000
needed pursuant to 1104C2, and appointing one would impose an unnecessary burden

275
00:27:11,000 --> 00:27:15,000
on the debtors and ultimately the creditors for whose benefit these cases

276
00:27:15,000 --> 00:27:19,000
are being pursued. Contrary to the trustee's position, this is not inconsistent

277
00:27:19,000 --> 00:27:23,000
with the language of the statute or the legislative history. Congress did not

278
00:27:23,000 --> 00:27:26,000
explain in the language of the statute itself what it meant by the as-is

279
00:27:26,000 --> 00:27:30,000
appropriate limitation. As I previously mentioned, many courts have concluded

280
00:27:30,000 --> 00:27:34,000
that it means a bankruptcy court must always appoint an examiner if the debt

281
00:27:34,000 --> 00:27:37,000
limit has been met but can limit the nature, extent, and duration of any

282
00:27:37,000 --> 00:27:41,000
examination. Others have concluded that if the bankruptcy court can limit the

283
00:27:41,000 --> 00:27:44,000
scope and duration, it must also mean that the court can conclude that no

284
00:27:44,000 --> 00:27:49,000
examination is needed at all under specific facts and circumstances.

285
00:27:49,000 --> 00:27:52,000
Clearly, there is more than one logical conclusion as to the meaning of Section

286
00:27:52,000 --> 00:27:58,000
1104C. The legislative history of 1104C, which at the time of its enactment was

287
00:27:58,000 --> 00:28:02,000
1104B, concluded that, quote, the standards for the appointment of an

288
00:28:02,000 --> 00:28:06,000
examiner are the same as those for the appointment of a trustee. The protection

289
00:28:06,000 --> 00:28:11,000
must be needed and the cost and expense must not be disproportionately high.

290
00:28:11,000 --> 00:28:20,000
H.R. Rep. No. 95-595, 95th Congress, 1st Section, 402, 1977. Thus, the

291
00:28:20,000 --> 00:28:24,000
legislative history supports the conclusion that an examiner shall be

292
00:28:24,000 --> 00:28:28,000
appointed, quote, as appropriate under the particular circumstances of the case,

293
00:28:28,000 --> 00:28:32,000
quote, the protection must be needed. That legislative intent is met in cases

294
00:28:32,000 --> 00:28:36,000
where, even though the debt limit of 1104C2 is met, the evidence establishes

295
00:28:36,000 --> 00:28:41,000
an examiner is not needed under the facts and circumstances of a particular case.

296
00:28:41,000 --> 00:28:44,000
Therefore, I will sustain the objections and deny the motion to appoint an

297
00:28:44,000 --> 00:28:49,000
examiner. The parties should meet and confer and submit a form of order under

298
00:28:49,000 --> 00:29:04,000
certification of counsel. Any questions? Next up.

299
00:29:04,000 --> 00:29:09,000
Thank you, Your Honor. I just wanted to go back very briefly to the Second

300
00:29:09,000 --> 00:29:14,000
Amendment agenda. There's an Item 5 that was the Committee's motion for

301
00:29:14,000 --> 00:29:21,000
permission to file a response to the United States Trustee's objection. I

302
00:29:21,000 --> 00:29:25,000
believe that matter is mooted out and the Committee is not pressing it, but I

303
00:29:25,000 --> 00:29:29,000
didn't, for housekeeping purposes, want to just let that hang out on the agenda.

304
00:29:29,000 --> 00:29:32,000
So you can probably hear from the Committee on that.

305
00:29:32,000 --> 00:29:37,000
Does seem moot.

306
00:29:37,000 --> 00:29:41,000
Your Honor, Matthew from the Conaway. I believe it's just the motion for

307
00:29:41,000 --> 00:29:45,000
permission to file the reply, Your Honor. It's simply procedural. I believe the

308
00:29:45,000 --> 00:29:48,000
U.S. Trustee had an objection to it, so House could be able to approve the

309
00:29:48,000 --> 00:29:50,000
form of order if it's acceptable.

310
00:29:50,000 --> 00:29:52,000
All right. We'll go ahead and just enter the order.

311
00:29:52,000 --> 00:29:55,000
Thank you. I just wanted to make sure that that loose end is tied up, and with

312
00:29:55,000 --> 00:29:59,000
that, we can pass the podium over to counsel to the Joint Provisional

313
00:29:59,000 --> 00:30:06,000
Liquidators.

314
00:30:06,000 --> 00:30:09,000
Good morning, Your Honor. Chris Shore from White and Case on behalf of the

315
00:30:09,000 --> 00:30:15,000
Joint Provisional Liquidators in the Chapter 15 case now. We're here today

316
00:30:15,000 --> 00:30:19,000
seeking recognition of the pending Bahamian liquidation as a foreign main

317
00:30:19,000 --> 00:30:26,000
proceeding and granting related relief. Tending in the courtroom today are Brian

318
00:30:26,000 --> 00:30:33,000
Sims and Peter Greaves, two of the JPLs. The third, Kevin Cambridge, unfortunately

319
00:30:33,000 --> 00:30:38,000
was unavailable to come today because he's ill with COVID. As for today's

320
00:30:38,000 --> 00:30:41,000
agenda, we're happy to report that there are no pending objections to our

321
00:30:41,000 --> 00:30:45,000
request for recognition. So if it's okay with the Court, I'd like to proceed as

322
00:30:45,000 --> 00:30:50,000
follows. First, I'd like to move in the evidence into the record and request

323
00:30:50,000 --> 00:30:53,000
that the Court enter the proposed form of order, which we filed on Monday at

324
00:30:53,000 --> 00:30:59,000
Docket 125. Then I'd like to give the Court a 15-minute status update, not in

325
00:30:59,000 --> 00:31:03,000
the way of evidence, but just to give Your Honor a sense of what the JPLs have

326
00:31:03,000 --> 00:31:09,000
been doing and give you kind of a six-month look forward so you know what's

327
00:31:09,000 --> 00:31:13,000
going to be happening in the case. And the good news is I don't perceive that

328
00:31:13,000 --> 00:31:18,000
we're going to be doing a lot in the 15 over that time, but maybe at the end we

329
00:31:18,000 --> 00:31:23,000
can set a further status conference just to let you know what's happening in that

330
00:31:23,000 --> 00:31:29,000
proceeding. And of course, at any time if Your Honor has questions, I'm happy to

331
00:31:29,000 --> 00:31:34,000
answer them or have others assist in the answer. As for the evidence, the

332
00:31:34,000 --> 00:31:39,000
verified petition is filed at Docket Number 1 of the Chapter 15. We have three

333
00:31:39,000 --> 00:31:42,000
declarations that we'd like to submit into evidence in support of the

334
00:31:42,000 --> 00:31:46,000
application. Those are the two declarations of Mr. Sims and the

335
00:31:46,000 --> 00:31:51,000
declaration of Sophia Roll Cap in support of the petition at Dockets 2, 5,

336
00:31:51,000 --> 00:31:56,000
and 8. Mr. Sims is here should you have any questions for him. Ms. Roll Cap had

337
00:31:56,000 --> 00:32:01,000
to be in the Bahamas yesterday at the recognition of the debtors Chapter 11

338
00:32:01,000 --> 00:32:05,000
cases in the Bahamian proceedings, but she is available via Zoom should the

339
00:32:05,000 --> 00:32:11,000
Court have any questions about the intricacies of Bahamian liquidation law.

340
00:32:11,000 --> 00:32:17,000
But I'd like to offer their declarations into evidence as Exhibits 1 to 4 on the

341
00:32:17,000 --> 00:32:21,000
exhibit list we distributed to the parties in interest in the Court, and also

342
00:32:21,000 --> 00:32:26,000
move into evidence Exhibit 5, which is an order from the Supreme Court of the

343
00:32:26,000 --> 00:32:38,000
Bahamas regarding the JPL's ability to commence the Chapter 15 action.

344
00:32:38,000 --> 00:32:43,000
Okay, anyone have an objection to the introduction of the evidence?

345
00:32:43,000 --> 00:32:47,000
Your Honor, Jim Bromley from Salt and Cromwell on behalf of the Chapter 11

346
00:32:47,000 --> 00:32:51,000
debtors, we do not have an objection to the admission of the evidence with

347
00:32:51,000 --> 00:32:57,000
respect to the recognition proceeding, but there are certain aspects of the

348
00:32:57,000 --> 00:33:03,000
declarations which we believe go beyond the four corners of the Chapter 15

349
00:33:03,000 --> 00:33:07,000
recognition. So as long as it's limited just to Chapter 15 recognition, just to

350
00:33:07,000 --> 00:33:10,000
this hearing, and just to this relief, we have no objection.

351
00:33:10,000 --> 00:33:11,000
All right, fine.

352
00:33:11,000 --> 00:33:17,000
No objection. Okay. Somebody to the limitation, Mr. Bromley.

353
00:33:17,000 --> 00:33:20,000
As for the motion itself, as part of the cooperation agreement that we

354
00:33:20,000 --> 00:33:24,000
entered into with the debtors, we agreed to support their application for

355
00:33:24,000 --> 00:33:30,000
recognition in the Bahamas. They agreed to support our application here, and we

356
00:33:30,000 --> 00:33:35,000
took their comments on the order. We then reached agreement on language with the

357
00:33:35,000 --> 00:33:42,000
DOJ, the U.S. Trustee, and the Committee. So as I said, the form of order which

358
00:33:42,000 --> 00:33:47,000
has been agreed to by the parties is at Docket 125. I do want to note that there

359
00:33:47,000 --> 00:33:52,000
have been a number of informal letters submitted by Mr. Leslie Stewart, the

360
00:33:52,000 --> 00:33:59,000
Hamean citizen. Specifically, he sent a letter that was docketed in the Chapter

361
00:33:59,000 --> 00:34:04,000
11 cases at Docket 357 and some others. We don't believe any of them constitute

362
00:34:04,000 --> 00:34:11,000
an objection to recognition, but wanted to raise this to your Honor's attention.

363
00:34:11,000 --> 00:34:15,000
I did see those letters, and I directed that they be put on the docket just

364
00:34:15,000 --> 00:34:18,000
because they wanted everyone to be able to see what kind of things that I'm

365
00:34:18,000 --> 00:34:21,000
receiving from folks here.

366
00:34:21,000 --> 00:34:25,000
Yes, Your Honor. So unless the Court has any questions, we respectfully request

367
00:34:25,000 --> 00:34:30,000
that the Court enter the amended proposed order, and we move to the status update.

368
00:34:30,000 --> 00:34:36,000
Anybody wish to be heard on the recognition? Satisfied, then. Relief is

369
00:34:36,000 --> 00:34:39,000
appropriate. I will enter the order.

370
00:34:39,000 --> 00:34:45,000
So just wanted to give your Honor a sense of where the JPL is abandoned, and as

371
00:34:45,000 --> 00:34:51,000
I said, give a kind of six-month look forward so you know what's going on. And

372
00:34:51,000 --> 00:34:56,000
I'll focus on, if you think of the debtor's presentation and the silos, FTX

373
00:34:56,000 --> 00:35:01,000
Digital is a subsidiary within the FTX International platform, that

374
00:35:01,000 --> 00:35:05,000
international silo. Now, the first day presentation may have left the Court

375
00:35:05,000 --> 00:35:10,000
with the impression that the FTX Digital estate played an undersized role in the

376
00:35:10,000 --> 00:35:14,000
saga, and I do want to address that, because it is actually, from our

377
00:35:14,000 --> 00:35:18,000
perspective, a big piece of the puzzle that's going to need to get resolved. At

378
00:35:18,000 --> 00:35:24,000
the time of the collapse, Digital employed 84 persons, including 38 who were

379
00:35:24,000 --> 00:35:30,000
transferred over from other FTX debtor entities, including a board and key

380
00:35:30,000 --> 00:35:36,000
management personnel. That company was the headquarters in Nassau, Bahamas. It's

381
00:35:36,000 --> 00:35:42,000
one of 52 properties that the JPLs have identified in the Bahamas, all held in

382
00:35:42,000 --> 00:35:47,000
the name of Chapter 11 debtor, in this case FTX Property Holdings. Amongst those

383
00:35:47,000 --> 00:35:52,000
properties was the DELEX Office Suite, residential complexes and

384
00:35:52,000 --> 00:35:59,000
accommodations for the employees, and a six-acre FTX campus in New Providence,

385
00:35:59,000 --> 00:36:04,000
Bahamas. All of these properties, we seem to think, are worth north of $250

386
00:36:04,000 --> 00:36:11,000
million. They were financed by FTX Digital and are on FTX's Digital's

387
00:36:11,000 --> 00:36:16,000
balance sheet as intercompany receivables. As part of the cooperation

388
00:36:16,000 --> 00:36:21,000
agreement, we've agreed with the debtors that the JPLs will take the lead on

389
00:36:21,000 --> 00:36:28,000
liquidating that real estate in the Bahamas. So there is a big real estate

390
00:36:28,000 --> 00:36:37,000
piece in FTX Digital. There was a motion to dismiss that entity, wasn't there?

391
00:36:37,000 --> 00:36:41,000
I thought it was the Turkish proceeding that did get dismissed. I thought I

392
00:36:41,000 --> 00:36:45,000
remembered seeing another one for one of the Bahamian entities. Yes, Your Honor,

393
00:36:45,000 --> 00:36:51,000
the properties in the Bahamas are actually owned in fee by a U.S. debtor,

394
00:36:51,000 --> 00:36:55,000
and the joint provisional liquidators did file a motion to dismiss that

395
00:36:55,000 --> 00:37:03,000
individual proceeding. That's been resolved. That one has been resolved as

396
00:37:03,000 --> 00:37:07,000
part of the cooperation agreement. We're going to go ahead and market and sell

397
00:37:07,000 --> 00:37:10,000
those assets, and then we're going to have a discussion about where those

398
00:37:10,000 --> 00:37:14,000
assets go at a later date. But... So I need to put something on the docket

399
00:37:14,000 --> 00:37:22,000
to close that out, close that motion out. Okay, we can address that. So of the

400
00:37:22,000 --> 00:37:27,000
84 employees who were living in the Bahamas at the time, there are 16

401
00:37:27,000 --> 00:37:34,000
employees who remain working on a variety of forensic matters and

402
00:37:34,000 --> 00:37:40,000
assisting with ongoing investigations. But moving back in time, as Mr. Bromley

403
00:37:40,000 --> 00:37:45,000
said at that first day hearing, the FTX International platform was primarily a

404
00:37:45,000 --> 00:37:52,000
digital assets trading and exchange platform for not U.S. citizens. To that

405
00:37:52,000 --> 00:38:00,000
end, FTX was created, FTX Digital was created in July 2021 for maintaining,

406
00:38:00,000 --> 00:38:04,000
for the purpose of migrating the business. Remember Mr. Bromley said that

407
00:38:04,000 --> 00:38:09,000
the entity was moving around the country and then offshore. It was all going to

408
00:38:09,000 --> 00:38:14,000
be moving to the Bahamas where this giant real estate conglomeration was and the

409
00:38:14,000 --> 00:38:20,000
headquarters. And that was going to allow FTX Group to take advantage of the

410
00:38:20,000 --> 00:38:25,000
Bahamas' favorable regulatory environment and the newly created DARE Act, which

411
00:38:25,000 --> 00:38:30,000
you've kind of heard about. The question that's going to come up in this case is

412
00:38:30,000 --> 00:38:36,000
what was the status of that movement between the time that digital was created

413
00:38:36,000 --> 00:38:44,000
and FTX and digital filed their respective proceedings? And I'm going to

414
00:38:44,000 --> 00:38:51,000
come back to that migration concept in a bit. But I did want to give your honor a

415
00:38:51,000 --> 00:38:56,000
sense before I get there of how the Bahamian proceeding is going to go along.

416
00:38:56,000 --> 00:39:01,000
The Bahamian proceedings are either voluntary or court supervised. Ours is

417
00:39:01,000 --> 00:39:08,000
court supervised. To that end Mr. Sims, Mr. Greaves, and Mr. Cambridge were

418
00:39:08,000 --> 00:39:16,000
appointed as joint provisional liquidators. The Supreme Court of the

419
00:39:16,000 --> 00:39:20,000
Bahamas has exclusive jurisdiction, right? Your honor has exclusive jurisdiction

420
00:39:20,000 --> 00:39:24,000
over assets worldwide of the debtors. The Supreme Court of the Bahamas is the one

421
00:39:24,000 --> 00:39:28,000
that has exclusive jurisdiction over insolvency proceedings and has broad

422
00:39:28,000 --> 00:39:36,000
authority to make winding up orders for all types of companies. When a company

423
00:39:36,000 --> 00:39:41,000
is being wound up compulsively by the court, the court issues an order which

424
00:39:41,000 --> 00:39:47,000
describes the steps that the liquidators must take to liquidate the company and

425
00:39:47,000 --> 00:39:53,000
the liquidator then as the JPLs here have been filing periodic status updates

426
00:39:53,000 --> 00:40:00,000
with the Bahamian court as to how they're doing on the order laying out their

427
00:40:00,000 --> 00:40:05,000
duties. Once appointed, liquidators generally gather assets, distribute

428
00:40:05,000 --> 00:40:11,000
companies' assets to the creditors on a peri-pesu basis. They have broad

429
00:40:11,000 --> 00:40:17,000
authority to bring and defend lawsuits, file claims, engage in business on behalf

430
00:40:17,000 --> 00:40:22,000
of the debtors. So it's best really to think about the JPLs as Chapter 11

431
00:40:22,000 --> 00:40:29,000
debtors. There are some distinctions, but normally the process runs that way. So

432
00:40:29,000 --> 00:40:34,000
to that end, over the past few months, let's talk about what they've been doing

433
00:40:34,000 --> 00:40:40,000
and then I'll come to what needs to get done. Beginning right from appointment,

434
00:40:40,000 --> 00:40:50,000
the JPLs took steps to identify and gain custody of cash. They've identified

435
00:40:50,000 --> 00:40:55,000
approximately $143 million of cash held by Silvergate and Moonstone, which your

436
00:40:55,000 --> 00:41:00,000
honor may have heard about. We filed requests for provisional relief with

437
00:41:00,000 --> 00:41:04,000
respect to those funds and then as the court knows, the U.S. Department of

438
00:41:04,000 --> 00:41:08,000
Justice seized the funds, but the JPLs are in active discussion with the DOJ

439
00:41:08,000 --> 00:41:13,000
with respect to the release of the funds and hope to have a consensual resolution

440
00:41:13,000 --> 00:41:21,000
on that. The JPLs also established cash management controls to ensure proper

441
00:41:21,000 --> 00:41:26,000
stewardship and security over the estate funds, much like the debtors have been

442
00:41:26,000 --> 00:41:30,000
doing, and the controls include rolling cash flow forecasts, payment approval

443
00:41:30,000 --> 00:41:34,000
controls, anti-money laundering, treasury controls, and all the things that you

444
00:41:34,000 --> 00:41:42,000
would expect a U.S. Chapter 11 trustee to do. There have been significant efforts

445
00:41:42,000 --> 00:41:47,000
and it's part of their requirements to communicate with customers and creditors.

446
00:41:47,000 --> 00:41:53,000
The JPLs launched a general informational website and creditor portal website.

447
00:41:53,000 --> 00:41:58,000
They've also sent letters out to approximately $2.4 million of potential

448
00:41:58,000 --> 00:42:05,000
customers inviting them to register their contact information in order to receive

449
00:42:05,000 --> 00:42:11,000
updates of what's going on. They've also been, much like the U.S. debtors, been in

450
00:42:11,000 --> 00:42:18,000
active communication with regulators in the Bahamas and in the U.S. and

451
00:42:18,000 --> 00:42:25,000
participating in investigations as well. We have been active in the Chapter 11

452
00:42:25,000 --> 00:42:32,000
case. To get to it, we believe we're a very large creditor in these cases. But, you

453
00:42:32,000 --> 00:42:39,000
know, the main goal which we reached early on in the case was the cooperation

454
00:42:39,000 --> 00:42:46,000
agreement which this court has approved and the Bahamian court has approved and

455
00:42:46,000 --> 00:42:53,000
it just gives us a framework from which we're going to try to figure out how the

456
00:42:53,000 --> 00:42:57,000
two proceedings are going to be done. This is where we are just to get a sense of

457
00:42:57,000 --> 00:43:02,000
the current financial picture, not evidence, but just to give your honor a

458
00:43:02,000 --> 00:43:07,000
sense of the size of what we're talking about. As I said, there's about $220 million

459
00:43:07,000 --> 00:43:18,000
in cash, $143 million subject to the DOJ seizure order. There's the $276 million

460
00:43:18,000 --> 00:43:24,000
receivable relating to the property. But so far, the JPLs have traced two major

461
00:43:24,000 --> 00:43:32,000
sources of outflows from their accounts in the lead-up to the case. $5.6 billion

462
00:43:32,000 --> 00:43:38,000
was transferred from FTX digital custodial accounts to a U.S. debtor at FTX

463
00:43:38,000 --> 00:43:44,000
trading. And $2.1 billion was transferred from FTX digital custodial accounts to

464
00:43:44,000 --> 00:43:50,000
Alameda, another Chapter 11 debtor. So to get the proper sense of the size here,

465
00:43:50,000 --> 00:43:58,000
we're talking about $7.7 billion of cash outflows from the Bahamian estate to the

466
00:43:58,000 --> 00:44:05,000
U.S. debtors. And then we have other tangible assets of about $3 million,

467
00:44:05,000 --> 00:44:11,000
mostly relating to office furniture equipment and the fleet of cars that the

468
00:44:11,000 --> 00:44:18,000
employees had in the Bahamas. So that's where we stand right now. Over the next

469
00:44:18,000 --> 00:44:23,000
six months, we've got to deal with the customer migration issue, obviously

470
00:44:23,000 --> 00:44:33,000
determining whether customers were customers of U.S. debtors or digital is

471
00:44:33,000 --> 00:44:39,000
going to be critical to any distribution scheme. We've got to address the issue of

472
00:44:39,000 --> 00:44:45,000
customer trust claims, as has happened in many other crypto cases. There are

473
00:44:45,000 --> 00:44:51,000
unresolved legal and factual issues as to the nature of the customer's deposits,

474
00:44:51,000 --> 00:44:55,000
whether they're held in trust, whether they're general unsecured claims, and

475
00:44:55,000 --> 00:44:59,000
we're going to need to work through that. We've got open trade contracts that

476
00:44:59,000 --> 00:45:05,000
we're going to need to address and see if there can't be a way to restructure the

477
00:45:05,000 --> 00:45:10,000
platform. And then as the debtors are doing here, there's a ton of work being

478
00:45:10,000 --> 00:45:16,000
done into antecedent transactions, not just in a company, but also with respect

479
00:45:16,000 --> 00:45:21,000
to third parties to determine whether those third parties or any of the persons

480
00:45:21,000 --> 00:45:29,000
associated with the transactions need to bring money back into the estate. So as

481
00:45:29,000 --> 00:45:34,000
I said, there's a lot of work that needs to be done. I'm not sure how much of it

482
00:45:34,000 --> 00:45:38,000
is going to need the involvement of the court, but we may be back seeking

483
00:45:38,000 --> 00:45:44,000
additional relief from the court to be able to get all that stuff done. And

484
00:45:44,000 --> 00:45:50,000
unless Your Honor has any questions, I just think we'd probably best to set a

485
00:45:50,000 --> 00:45:57,000
status conference sometime in the May-June timeframe and come back and kind

486
00:45:57,000 --> 00:46:02,000
of tell you where we are on those issues and then give you a look forward again

487
00:46:02,000 --> 00:46:06,000
just so you're not wondering what's happening with your Chapter 15 case.

488
00:46:06,000 --> 00:46:22,000
Okay. I appreciate the update, Mr. Schor. Let's see, we'll find a...why don't we

489
00:46:22,000 --> 00:46:37,000
set a status conference for May 17th at 10 a.m. All right. Thank you very much,

490
00:46:37,000 --> 00:46:47,000
Your Honor. Thank you. Appreciate it. Mr. Spalding? Your Honor, I just would like

491
00:46:47,000 --> 00:46:51,000
to mention a couple things from our perspective. One is we did have a hearing

492
00:46:51,000 --> 00:46:57,000
yesterday in the Bahamas, and the Supreme Court of the Bahamas has agreed to

493
00:46:57,000 --> 00:47:01,000
enter an order that will be consistent with the order that Your Honor will

494
00:47:01,000 --> 00:47:06,000
enter here to allow the two proceedings, sets of proceedings, to be recognized.

495
00:47:06,000 --> 00:47:11,000
The U.S. proceedings being recognized in the Bahamas, the Bahamian proceedings

496
00:47:11,000 --> 00:47:15,000
being recognized here in the United States. I don't know if you're just not

497
00:47:15,000 --> 00:47:20,000
speaking into the microphones or for... I'm sorry. I'm a little rough today.

498
00:47:20,000 --> 00:47:25,000
Yeah, I know the feeling. Which I could say was because I was out drinking last

499
00:47:25,000 --> 00:47:31,000
night, but it wasn't. I wasn't either way. Your Honor, just wanted to point out

500
00:47:31,000 --> 00:47:36,000
there was a hearing yesterday in the Bahamas. The Supreme Court of the Bahamas

501
00:47:36,000 --> 00:47:41,000
has agreed to enter an order to recognize the Chapter 11 proceedings in the

502
00:47:41,000 --> 00:47:50,000
Bahamas so that there will be a coincident recognition in both jurisdictions.

503
00:47:50,000 --> 00:47:54,000
So we'll have a recognition here, a recognition in the Bahamas. And the

504
00:47:54,000 --> 00:47:59,000
cooperation agreement had required that both orders be entered, so they're

505
00:47:59,000 --> 00:48:04,000
mutually dependent on each other. The other thing I'd like to say, Your Honor, I

506
00:48:04,000 --> 00:48:09,000
hadn't been aware that Mr. Schor was going to make any comments about issues,

507
00:48:09,000 --> 00:48:15,000
and one of the things that are coming up. And I do think that it's important that

508
00:48:15,000 --> 00:48:20,000
the Chapter 11 debtors also make a statement here. Many of the points that

509
00:48:20,000 --> 00:48:27,000
Mr. Schor mentioned in terms of things like assets that were in digital market

510
00:48:27,000 --> 00:48:32,000
accounts or the migration of customers and the things of that sort, those are all

511
00:48:32,000 --> 00:48:38,000
open issues. The cooperation agreement is a starting point, but the issues as to

512
00:48:38,000 --> 00:48:44,000
whether assets belong in the Bahamian estate or in the U.S. estate are open

513
00:48:44,000 --> 00:48:48,000
issues. And so the statements that Mr. Schor has made in that regard are

514
00:48:48,000 --> 00:48:53,000
statements that the U.S. debtors reserve all their rights on and frankly disagree

515
00:48:53,000 --> 00:48:55,000
with many of them.

516
00:48:55,000 --> 00:48:56,000
I understand.

517
00:48:56,000 --> 00:48:57,000
Thank you, Your Honor.

518
00:48:57,000 --> 00:49:04,000
Thank you. Anything else? Where do we stand on the examiner? You knew what I

519
00:49:04,000 --> 00:49:09,000
was going to ask, Michel.

520
00:49:09,000 --> 00:49:12,000
Thank you, Your Honor. For the record, Adam Landis from Landis, Bethany, and

521
00:49:12,000 --> 00:49:16,000
Kauffman on behalf of the Chapter 11 debtors. Yes, I saw that question coming,

522
00:49:16,000 --> 00:49:22,000
and I can represent to the Court that the parties have been discussing this

523
00:49:22,000 --> 00:49:27,000
periodically, sometimes more frequently than others, but there are discussions

524
00:49:27,000 --> 00:49:32,000
going back and forth. We've identified a couple of potential fee examiners, and

525
00:49:32,000 --> 00:49:35,000
we're trying to come to ground to have an agreement on this rather than

526
00:49:35,000 --> 00:49:39,000
submit it to the Court for the Court's determination. So we're still working on

527
00:49:39,000 --> 00:49:43,000
that. We hope to have it done soon, and we do appreciate that the Court is not

528
00:49:43,000 --> 00:49:47,000
going to approve any fee applications unless and until a fee examiner is

529
00:49:47,000 --> 00:49:50,000
appointed and has an opportunity to review those applications.

530
00:49:50,000 --> 00:49:57,000
Okay. Thank you. All right. Anything else? It will turn out to be a lot shorter

531
00:49:57,000 --> 00:50:01,000
hearing than I had anticipated. I appreciate everyone's cooperation. I

532
00:50:01,000 --> 00:50:05,000
appreciate the updates, and we are adjourned. Thank you. Thank you, Your Honor.

