This episode is brought to you by the New York Piano Group,
whose support helps make this show possible.
Do you ever dream of connecting with a community
that shares your passion for piano?
Discover the New York Piano Group,
where adult pianists of all levels
come together to learn, perform, and grow
in a supportive and inspiring environment.
From monthly Zoom performance meetups
to live concert opportunities,
you'll hone your skills and connect with fellow enthusiasts.
Join today at newyorkpianogroup.org.
Or join our community on meetup.com
and start your piano journey with us today.
The other thing I didn't talk about that is important
is the control of the sound on the repeated chords.
["Piano Tune"]
To get that sound working, you need to stay inside your key.
You need to actually be at the bottom of the key.
Don't release the keys all the way up to the top.
["Piano Tune"]
If these are too noisy,
["Piano Tune"]
that's gonna drown out your top.
So the objective there would be to keep these
actually quite light.
["Piano Tune"]
So in terms of tonal hierarchy,
we've got the melody line,
which has the lion's share of the sound.
The next level would be the bass note.
["Bass Tune"]
Substantial, not loud, but firm.
Firm enough to support the sound above.
And then finally, these chords.
["Chord Tune"]
As light as you can get them.
So I think those ingredients will help you
to get that line singing
above the quite substantial background.
Welcome back to another episode of The Pianopod, everyone.
Today, I have the pleasure of speaking with Graham Fitch,
a pianist, educator, writer,
and one of the most influential voices
in piano pedagogy today.
His work has transformed how pianists approach practice,
technique, and musical expression,
offering a structured yet flexible method
that empowers musicians to play
with both technical ease and artistic depth.
As someone who has dedicated decades to teaching piano,
I know firsthand the challenges
and rewards of mentoring students.
My journey as a pianist and educator began over 20 years ago,
working with students of all levels,
from young beginners to pre-conservatory prodigies
and lifelong enthusiasts.
I've had a privilege of guiding students
from all walks of life,
from those who have gone on to win competitions
and pursue professional careers,
to those who simply find joy and fulfillment
in playing for their own enrichment.
Whether teaching in higher education or running
a thriving piano studio in the heart of New York City,
I've constantly sought to refine my approach,
balancing technical rigor with musical expression,
structure with creativity.
During this journey, I discovered Graham's videos on YouTube
created in collaboration with Pianist Magazine.
His instructions were a game changer in my teaching,
especially as I began working with more gifted students
who required a higher level of technical
and artistic refinement.
His approach to practice is revolutionary,
not because it introduces an entirely new method,
but because it refines and clarifies the principles
that truly make a difference.
Graham understands that effective practice
is about more than just repetition.
It's about precision, problem solving,
and mindful exploration.
His guidance reinforced my belief
that practice should be an active, thoughtful process
rather than a mindless routine.
What makes his work truly groundbreaking
is his ability to blend historic piano pedagogy
with cutting edge research in neuroscience,
offering pianists practical and innovative tools
for learning and improvement.
His teachings don't just make students play better,
they transform the way they think about music,
technique, and interpretation.
Graham has built an international reputation
through his highly regarded master classes,
his contributions to Pianist Magazine,
and groundbreaking educational platform,
the Practicing the Piano Online Academy.
Based in Southwest London,
he works with professional musicians, educators,
and dedicated pianists worldwide,
helping them unlock their full potential
through structured yet adaptable teaching.
His approach integrates principles of psychology,
biomechanics, and injury prevention,
making his insights essential for anyone looking
to improve their playing while maintaining long-term physical
and mental wellbeing.
In today's conversation,
we will explore the art of effective practice,
holistic piano technique, the role of mental practice,
fostering creativity and individuality in teaching,
and his pioneering work in online education.
This episode is packed with practical strategies,
thought-provoking insights, and inspiring ideas
that will benefit pianists, educators,
and music lovers alike.
Whether you are a performer striving
for deeper artistic expression,
a teacher looking for new ways to inspire students,
or someone passionate about the piano,
Graham's perspective will give you a fresh
and effective approach to practicing and performing.
Before we begin, I have some exciting news.
The Pianopod is now on Substack.
This platform allows us to share exclusive content,
behind-the-scenes stories, and early access to episodes.
Your support on Substack helps us continue bringing
meaningful conversations with guests like Graham Fitch,
exploring the many dimensions of piano playing and pedagogy.
So please join us, our growing community,
at the pianopod.substack.com.
Now, without further ado,
let's welcome Graham Fitch to the Pianopod.
Please enjoy the show.
["Pianopod"]
You are listening to the Pianopod,
where we talk to the brightest minds in the industry
about how they are bringing the piano into the future
and thriving in a complex, ever-evolving world.
Welcome to the Pianopod, Graham.
Thank you, David.
Thank you.
It's such a pleasure and honor to have you on the show.
So where are you joining us from today?
I'm coming to you from London,
from Wimbledon in southwest London.
Rather rainy day today, but I'm sitting in the warm here
and enjoying our chat.
Great, and I like your background.
There are so many music scores.
Yes, this is just one room, one wall.
Upstairs, I've got things like chamber music,
and then in the other room, I've got textbooks,
but this is like day-to-day scores that I need
for my piano teaching, my own playing and practice.
Piano's over there, out of sight, but not out of mind.
Okay, looks beautiful.
So I am genuinely so excited to speak with you today.
Over the years, I've watched countless video clips
you've created in collaboration with Pianist Magazine,
and your videos are widely celebrated
for their clarity, depth, and practical application,
and I completely agree with the praise.
Combining these three elements into one video is not easy,
but what truly stands out is your ability
to demystify complex, not just techniques,
but also techniques combined with interpretations.
That's really, yeah, breaking them down in a way
that's accessible for pianists of all levels.
That's quite impressive.
Thank you very much.
I'm not aware that I'm doing that.
I just do my thing, you know,
and hope that people get something from the videos,
and yeah, thank you for that.
Yeah, and then so for instance, for example,
your masterclass on organizing practice time
is full of practical advice
that's both insightful and actionable.
So typically there are countless videos
focusing on techniques and how to play,
so mind you, I said play, not practice.
So those type of videos are out there,
but a video dedicated to the how of practicing
felt truly groundbreaking to me.
And of course, your insightful lessons on piano techniques
are equally remarkable,
and your approach to scales and arpeggios
transforms what can often feel like routine drills
into imaginative and engaging sessions.
So it's clear that your work
not only fosters technical mastery,
but also nurtures a deeper understanding
and appreciation of the art of piano practice.
So before we dive into the main conversation,
I'd love to get your thoughts on this, Graham.
As one of the most respected and sought after figures
in piano pedagogy and piano world today,
you've witnessed the evolution of teaching
from the traditions of historical pedagogy
to modern cutting edge approaches
with so much information and technique now available online,
everywhere.
What do you think defines effective piano teaching
in today's world?
And where do you see the future of pedagogy heading?
That's a huge question there, Yukimi.
I think the first thing that's changed,
one of the things that's changed
is the student centered approach to teaching.
In the old days,
I think the student was just sitting there
on the piano stool and the teacher told them what to do,
and there was never any real engagement with the student.
And certainly very little respect for the student.
I think that's the, you know,
the student is the equal in terms of adult to adult
communication, even if they're children.
There's the adult part of me, the adult part of them.
I mean, I teach very few children,
but that's number one, I think.
The student centered approach to the learning,
respect for the student.
Also, there's a move away from the conservatory model,
which is this idea of, you know,
developing technique through polishing a certain number
of pieces and spending all day doing etudes,
which, you know, science has now shown,
probably don't do quite as much good
as we had originally thought.
You know, back, if you look back to the evolution
of the etude, the Czerny-Clementi model.
So, you know, you were supposed to sit there
for hours a day.
You could read a book if you wanted, you know,
and develop double thirds from dry exercises.
And then you were supposed to be able to just attach that
to a piece of music.
Well, we now know that that's not quite as simple as that.
So, you know, the conservatory model versus the,
I call it the Baroque model,
which is the rounded musician,
the way that pianists or musicians,
not pianists because the piano hadn't been invented then,
but back in the day, you know,
when Bach was around, he would be teaching keyboard technique.
He'd be teaching musicianship.
He'd be teaching composition.
He'd be teaching theory.
All these subjects that are so, have been so neglected.
So there's a kind of swing away from that conservatory model
where everybody has to fit into that
toward the option of, you know,
maybe producing a more, a structure for a student
that's a little bit more broad-based
where they learn more than just pianistic skills.
These are a few of the things.
So I could, I'd spend all day
just answering that first question.
I think the other thing I'm finding,
certainly with my own work,
is that the student should be a part of the process,
the creative process.
So rather than the teacher saying,
make a crescendo there and play that note detached,
and then take a little time here
and the student blindly doing it
without any reason why they're just doing it
to obey the teacher.
I think I would rather, and do,
rather teach by experimentation.
What would it feel like if this note
were a little firmer than the others in that phrase?
Try that and see how they try it.
What do you think?
In other words, I'm asking for their feedback.
I'm asking them to tell me whether they liked that
or whether they appreciated that.
I've got one particularly bright young man,
well, he's 13, who I'm teaching at the moment,
who doesn't tell me very much verbally,
but he tells me a lot in other ways.
I was suggesting at one point that he could,
at a cadence point, let's take a little time at the cadence.
And I could see his reaction was,
no, I don't want to take time there.
I don't feel that.
And I could see that.
And I said to him, okay, try it your way
and see if I buy it.
So he tried it his way.
And I said, I can see where you're coming from,
but it just feels like we need a little space there.
Can you find another way of doing it that makes you happy?
So he found another way.
And then I said, I'll buy that.
That works for me too.
So he had led me to lead him to a solution
that was authentic to him.
It wasn't just something that I told him to do.
Yeah, and also getting them to evaluate themselves
rather than my telling them at the end of a performance
of something, what I thought of it.
I might say, how did you feel about it?
What did you enjoy about your performance there?
What do you think you did really well?
Start off with the positives.
And they'll usually say, well, yes,
I think I'm beginning to learn how to project the melody
above the left hand or whatever it may be.
And then I'll invite them to say,
are there any areas or any spots that you feel
could use a little bit of improvement
or where you need a little bit of the help?
And they say, this bit over there,
that didn't work very well.
So they'll point to someplace on the score.
And then I'll say, well, whereabouts exactly was it
that you weren't happy?
And I'll get them to, they think for a moment it was there.
And I get them to diagnose what it is.
And maybe I'll then ask them,
so how do you think you could solve that problem?
What do you do in your practice that will help you
to get more comfortable with that moment?
And they'll usually stop and think.
And when they've been with me for a while,
they have a repertoire of practice tools
that they know about and that they can apply.
So that's a hell of a long answer to a question,
but it's a big question.
Sure, sure.
Thank you so much for explaining.
Now, student-centered approach is, yeah, I agree with you,
is not just in music, but I think that's the trend
that I feel in many different fields of academics too.
So it's more interactive.
It's not this one teacher's standing in front
of the classroom and telling them what to do.
But that's how my generation, that's how I learn things.
I know, I know.
See, the thing is, you've only got to listen to, say,
10 different recordings of a particular piece
to hear 10 different tempi, 10 different approaches
to the articulation, the pedaling, the musical message.
So how can it, just the one that the teacher wants to espouse,
how can that be true?
It's not true.
It's the teacher's opinion.
So I think I'm trying to get away from that.
I think the teacher guides the student toward something
that's authentic to them, that's expressing something
from within them, not pasted on, copied and pasted
from a teacher.
Right, right.
But that's how I learned.
So when I started teaching, it was confusing.
It was like, oh my goodness, actually
teaching in this modern age, modern students,
is completely different from how I was taught.
So it was like a whole relearning process for me too.
You know what I mean?
Yeah.
So I think it's challenging.
It's challenging.
Bikimi, can I tell you a little anecdote?
I've just remembered it now.
It was years back I was teaching at the Purcell School,
which is a specialist music school
for very talented youngsters.
And I had this girl who had come,
I think she'd come from, come somewhere from Asia.
I forget exactly what country it was,
but she had had that exact same tradition.
And one lesson, and I was getting a little bit tired
of her bringing in just the notes.
And she wanted me to tell her exactly
what to do with the notes.
So I can remember one lesson.
She brought in the exposition of a sonata
or the first movement of a sonata.
Don't remember which sonata it was.
And I said, let's try a little experiment.
So we divide, she had two lessons a week.
So I said, let's spend the first half of this lesson
doing one thing, and then we'll break at that half point,
and then we'll do something a bit different.
So I guided her through an interpretation
that made sense within itself.
In other words, it was logical.
If you do this here, then it leads to this here.
And then she tried it and her eyes were lighting up.
Oh, she liked that there, nice.
And then at the half hour point,
I stopped and took it right back to the beginning again
and started again with a different approach,
like a different interpretation.
And so at the end of the lesson,
she was left with option A, option B.
And she said, so which one of those do I do?
And I said, I don't know.
Meaning, go away and think about it.
Go away and try this, see where that leads you.
So in that moment, she was confused,
but I wanted her to be confused because, you know,
there was nothing that was coming from within.
It was all external.
Right, right, yes, yeah.
So it was a big adjustment,
but your videos really helped me,
especially on when you talk about how to practice.
It's not the what to practice, but how.
That really makes everybody, anyone think, right?
So coming from where you are,
and I like to start with the practical,
piano practice method.
Yeah.
So many pianists struggle with how to structure
their practice time effectively,
because we're living in such a busy, busy world.
And, but piano literature is expansive, massive.
I mean, there's no way we can learn the entire,
you know, piano literature out there in one life.
But that's the reality.
But what do you believe are the essential components
of a productive practice session,
and how should students prioritize their time?
Let's start with that.
That's such a vast question, Yukimi, yes.
I would, goodness.
So I'm a great believer, first of all,
in the 20-minute practice session.
I wrote a blog on that topic,
the 20-minute practice session,
which is a short task-specific session,
where before you even go to the instrument
to sit down and twiddle fingers,
you've got a plan for what you're going to do.
So it could be, I'm going to work without the pedal
on the first section of this piece at a slower tempo,
or I'm going to play with,
I'm going to practice pianissimo, whatever it may be,
or I'm going to do, I'm going to work in tiny
one-measure sections,
and I'm not going to go on to measure two
until I've absorbed everything from measure one.
Whatever it may be, there's a plan.
And at the end of that 20-minute session,
because that's about the length
that the human mind can focus on one thing,
there's a break.
Oh, I wish I'd brought my little cube.
Oh, I'd have to go out of shot to get it.
But I've got a little, I don't remember,
it's like a dogedecahedron where it's got several sides
and you turn it up and you can spend 20 minutes
on this thing and then a little alarm goes,
and then you flip it back the other way,
and then you can take a little break for a moment.
I think that's really important to take a break
at the end of the 20 minutes,
even if it's just to do a little bit of stretching
and move the body, or not so much of a break,
just to go on to another activity,
so that you've scheduled the activity ahead.
Because I do find that a lot of people go to the piano
with their music sort of sitting there
and they haven't any idea what they're gonna do or why,
or how that fits into the bigger picture
for what they wanna do for the week,
or between today and tomorrow,
bigger pictures with the practising.
There's so much to say about this
because I have found that a lot of people seem to think
that practising is, the results of the practising
should happen at the end of the practise session.
And they're very surprised when I tell them,
no, it can't happen that way.
You've got to allow, first of all,
there needs to be a good night's sleep, or a night's sleep,
because the information, I'm no scientist,
but I'm interested in neuroscience,
and I'm very lucky to be working with Professor Adina Mornell,
who is an expert in this very, very subject.
We're collaborating on a couple of projects,
and she's told me what happens in the brain.
The information goes to a certain part of the brain
and it sits there until we sleep,
and when we sleep, it goes up somewhere else,
and then goes into the long-term memory.
So, you know, those people that are sitting there,
maybe they'll do a little bit of slow practise,
or they'll do some practise with accents and rhythms,
or whatever it may be,
and then they will try it out again,
and they'll be most disappointed it hasn't worked,
and then they say, oh, this doesn't work,
so they go back to their playthroughs,
because students love to just play through, you know.
It sounds like there's a, you know, those platform games
where you've got monsters and you have to,
and you have to blitz them, you have to,
so what I've noticed students do,
including Juilliard students, do this.
They're playing, playing, playing, playing,
they come across a spot that doesn't work,
so they hammer at it, you know, until it yields somewhat,
and then they go on.
So what they've practised is getting it wrong 10 times
and right on the 11th attempt,
and they think that that's enough.
But I often say to my students,
and I have to remind myself,
that I do a little bit of practise, a stint of practise,
and then I leave it, I leave that to assimilate,
I leave it to move from this part of my brain
to the other part of the brain,
whichever part that is,
I've forgotten the labels for these bits.
So the process there is, first of all,
knowing what to do, and then trusting the process,
trusting that it's going to take time.
You're going to need to repeat those steps probably again,
and probably again, before you can expect any kind of,
you know, tangible result.
My last teacher, Nina Sveglaneva,
who sadly passed away last year,
very important teacher to many people, including to me,
she would often say, without the benefit of neuroscience,
but with the huge benefit of her great tradition,
the best of the Russian tradition,
she would say, what you do now shows up in your practise,
shows up two weeks later.
And that's now been proven scientifically.
It's fascinating, isn't it?
So she would never change anything
two or three weeks before a performance.
If we went for a lesson and she knew we were playing the piece
in two or three weeks, she wouldn't do anything much.
It certainly wouldn't change anything.
No fingerings changes or no big sort of interpretative shifts
or tempo shifts.
She would just go very gently with what we'd got then,
which was so sensible, you know?
Practice is often associated with repetition.
So you mentioned about 20-minute practising.
So we have this thought, more and more you practise,
the better, so all the pianists, they would lock themselves
in the practise rooms for hours and hours.
That's the sort of tradition that I was taught.
Yeah, so there's so much there that's important to understand,
I think, with repetition, because what happens is,
if we repeat something in the same way more than once or twice,
the brain habituates to that and there's no stimuli that get in.
So the brain says, been there, done that.
So there's several things to say about this.
One is, I think, that we need to, when we repeat,
don't do it too many times the same way before you start
changing things around a little bit.
So let's say you're repeating a passage, change the tempo,
change the dynamic, change the touch, the articulation,
change the meaning, you know, all sorts of different things.
Play one hand stronger than the other,
play on the surface of the keys, or one repetition,
could that not be done in the head, visualising?
That's one thing to say.
So I mean, I'm often asking students how they're practising
and I'm asking them to demonstrate,
and I will model what my teachers did to me.
So they'll do one thing, I'll say, yes, great,
and, you know, and what else?
So we've got a list of about ten things.
But I think, going back to what you were saying about repetition,
to me, there are two main necessities in each practice session.
One is the presence of an inner quality control inspector.
Now, a quality control inspector is the sort of person
that inhabits the end of a production line.
So maybe you could imagine a cookie factory somewhere where,
I'm trying to remember, US cookies,
Entenmann's or Pepperidge Farm or whatever it may be.
So at the end of the production line,
there's a hair-netted creature who's looking over the cookies
that are coming up and spotting any that are defective,
or maybe this one's got a crack in it
or this one's got a raisin missing from it
or a chocolate chip has removed itself.
So the quality control inspector
promptly removes those from the conveyor belt,
stuffs them in her handbag for later use,
and then, you know, the product that gets packaged up and sold on
has a certain level of quality.
Now, I firmly believe that that quality control inspector
can be fostered and developed within even the youngest student
by simply asking them, what mark would you give for yourself
out of 10 for what you just did there?
And it's completely non-judgmental.
I'm not giving them a mark.
And they may say, seven.
And I would say, oh, I would give you a 7.2 or maybe a 7.25.
I mean, we make a little joke about it.
And I say, well, where did the missing three marks go?
You know, why didn't you give yourself a 10?
And they stop and think about it for a minute,
and then they, with a little bit of prodding and cajoling,
they will often come up with exactly what it was
that stopped it from being a 10, because there's me asking them.
So after a while, what happens is that they embody that
in their quality control inspector
and use it for themselves in their own practice,
so that they don't, if I've asked them to, say,
practice the left hand by itself without the pedal,
they won't just do a sloppy job with it.
They'll do a really good job with it.
That's one thing.
I wish I had a whiteboard or something,
but I can illustrate this using little graphics in the air.
So I'd like for your listeners, viewers,
to imagine there's three separate bubbles, let's say,
horizontal bubbles.
You've got stage A, you've got stage B, and you've got stage C.
Now, stage A is where you plan what it is you're going to do.
So I'm going to play the left hand of bar six,
and I'm going to make sure I play a C sharp on the fourth beat.
And then you execute that plan, you play that thing.
And then stage C, which is where people don't go,
is you evaluate, you judge, you appraise.
Is what I did in stage B what I intended to do in stage A?
Or not.
And if it is, then you give a little check mark in the C stage,
the C, the evaluation stage.
If it's not, you put a little X in there
and feed back the information to a new stage A.
So I'm now going to play this bar, paying attention to that C sharp.
And the focus of the mind is on that one thing,
so that when you repeat, you've got a good chance of actually
achieving the thing that you're focused on.
But without the focus, it's chimps dancing on the keyboard.
You know, what's that book, The Chimp Paradox?
So I reckon here we've got chimps.
We need to train these chimps.
I've got two here, two feet.
These need to be trained to do what the mind wants them to do,
and the mind has to be attuned to what the composer wants them to do,
or the teacher, or whatever.
So I think a lot of practice ends up being mindless, mindless repetition.
Of the playthrough type, just bang a bang a bang away
until you bludgeon this thing into some sort of shape.
Right. Yeah, yeah, yeah.
So that's a pitfall of practicing, right?
So what you're suggesting is by creating variations to one practice,
one passage, for example, do staccato,
or do left and only change the key, for example.
By doing that, you are more aware of progress.
You're more aware of what you're doing
rather than just mindless practice for hours.
Yes, and you're bringing a sense of playfulness into the process,
which is educational, because if you think about it,
we play music, we play the piano.
Why is practice so often drudgery?
There's no sense of fun in it.
But if you give a student a challenge,
like I've sometimes said something like this,
let's say there's a chord stream, and I'll say,
can you play your right hand, but only play the second fingers?
Just play the notes that the second finger plays,
don't play any other fingers.
That really makes them think.
Or can you play just the thumb notes in this, whatever it may be,
and that's educational, because it forces us to concentrate on the material.
And it's only when we're concentrating, burning glucose in the,
wherever it happens, that we make the connections and we learn.
Otherwise, it's mindless, and we may as well be doing something else.
I think a lot of times people may as well get up away from the piano
and do something more profitable.
If they're not concentrating on what they're doing, they're not learning.
Yeah, and then, you know, even like preparing for performance or something
and being able to play through this piece.
And if I am not practicing with my mind, then I start thinking about something else.
Like this happens to especially young students,
and then while they're playing the piece in front of me,
they're thinking something else, or they're like, I don't know, smiling or something.
I asked my student, what were you thinking?
And how I was thinking about what happened at school today was so funny.
Right?
Yeah, so I think what's important for me is that we need to be thinking in the practice,
but not thinking in the performance.
We need to be concentrating when we're performing.
But the difference is we need to let ourselves go and let the music emerge as a communication,
not worrying about what the wrist is doing or not doing at this point,
or worrying about our pedaling.
So we're intent on communicating the message of the music to the listener.
So what you've just said there brings up two kind of elements,
the practicing mind and the performing mind.
Funnily enough, I've just finished an article for Pianist magazine where I quote Yasha Heifetz,
you know, the great violinist who is such an inspiration to me.
I just love listening to Yasha Heifetz's violin playing.
It makes it sound like a voice.
He said, practice like it means everything in the world to you.
Perform like you couldn't give a damn.
Yeah.
So when we're performing, we're not worrying about whether we play a wrong note
or, you know, whether we remember to do what teachers said about our forearm here.
We're just going with the communication of the music.
We're in a different state of mind.
Wow, that's interesting.
So speaking of, you know, performance,
so prepping for a live performance is a completely different thing.
Or maybe is it, does it should be like, should it be part of the practice process?
Yeah.
Not completely, entirely separate.
See, while I think the danger is, when people are learning a piece that they're going to eventually perform
and they use the repeated read through method,
which is a practice session whereby you start at the beginning and you play to the end
and you say, oh, that was terrible.
Let me do it again.
And they go back to the beginning and they play through to the end.
And it was probably just a tiny bit better.
And they spend an hour doing that.
They get to a point by the end of the practice session where they feel like they've made progress with the piece.
Fact is they haven't.
What they've done is busking through it 20 times and making something that approaches maybe the music on the 21st attempt.
Whereas in performance, we've got to get it the very first time.
So I'm very much stressing avoid that repeated read through method when you're first learning a piece that you're going to perform.
Do some deep learning.
I've got this story of the three little pigs.
You know, it's not my story.
I don't know. Do you know the story of the three little pigs?
Yeah. So everybody knows it, which is why it's good.
It's only the third little pig that bothers to dig the foundations and then build his house with bricks and proper materials that are going to last that can ward off the big bad wolf.
So no amount of huffing and puffing from the big bad wolf is going to blow that third little pigs house down because he or she has invested the time in digging down, digging deep and not just erecting some structure that will get blown away by the first gust of wind.
Which, which I think there's a parallel with that and how we learn a piece that we're going to eventually perform, which is to to engage in deep learning techniques, variable practice, as much different types of practice as possible.
And I'm reminded of the wonderful pianist Egon Petri.
Don't know if you know that name Egon Petri, Petri, maybe P E T R I, a pianist from yesteryear, who was asked by an admiring student.
How come your performances are so impeccable and, you know, you said, well, I wouldn't dream of performing a piece until I've run out of ways to practice it.
Creative practice, you know, variable practice. And so that's one thing. But then the other side of that coin is when we get closer to a performance.
We're absolutely going to need to play the piece through for ourselves. And actually, I have a wonderful memory of my last teacher Nina.
She used to teach often till quite late at night. And in the later years, she wasn't performing because she was so busy teaching. How could you expect somebody who's busy teaching to have time to practice?
But there was a time in her career when she was performing.
So I think my lesson was something like 10 at night. I think it was pretty late.
And then I said to her after after the lesson, it was always pretty strictly an hour.
Now you can now you can relax, you know, put your feet up. I think I even suggested that she might have a vodka or something.
He said, but my dear, everything was my dear. No, I have now to sit and play my whole program through.
So after a day of teaching, she would go to the piano and religiously play from the beginning of her program right up to the end, whether she wanted to do it or not.
No matter how good the playing was or not, she was going into training.
She often used that expression, going into training for what she would have to do on the day, which is to start on the first note of the program and finish on the last note of the program.
So if we haven't practiced doing that regularly, how can we expect the performance to to emerge from the practice room?
We need a final stage, which is something I call practicing a performance.
Well, practicing a performance is where if you imagine those three stages, ABC, so a in the planning stage, I've decided now I'm going to play through my whole performance from the beginning to the end for the first time for myself.
And then I execute that I do my my my program from the beginning to the end. And hopefully the first time I do it, I'll record it.
And then when I go through my judgment, the evaluation, it's not very pleasant, actually, because it's a little bit like looking at yourself in one of those makeup mirrors, you know, mirrors that exaggerate.
First of all, you're going to only going to see the blemishes.
We've got negativity bias as human beings. We only see what we don't like. So very important that we go away from the piano.
We have a little notebook or a clipboard. I quite like my clipboard for this.
And I make bullet points. I first of all make bullet points as I as I'm listening back about things that I liked.
Yes, that the phrasing, they're beautiful. I like my pedaling there.
I liked my characterization here. But when it gets to bar eleven, my left hand is unclear. So I put a little bullet point by eleven left hand clear.
And then it may go on a little bit more.
Sixteen and then the measure. So we say measure in the UK measure sixteen.
We say bar in the UK. You say measure in the US.
So whatever. I'm sure we all know what we mean. Measure sixteen. My sixteenth notes in the right hand were uneven or whatever it could be.
So at the end of the reflection stage or the appraisal stage, we're left with a piece of paper, a sheet of paper with bullet points of things that we need to attend to.
Those things that didn't quite stack up in a performance.
Those bullet points inform the content of the next practice session, which Nina always used to call spot practice.
So the process was practice the performance reflection spot practice and the spot practice could be done over the course of several days or could be done.
Let's say you did your run through in the morning. You reflect a little bit in the noon time and then in the afternoon you do spot practice.
You know, you can tweak this for how you want, but she would do that daily for about a week.
This process practice the performance reflection spots.
And then after the week, I mean, I experienced it. I'll tell you in a moment how I experienced that.
Then she would go back to more kind of normal maintenance practice, polishing, finesse, because I think we pianists never stop working on refining,
finessing, polishing, you know, bolstering up the memory, all those things.
So she would do the practice performances in tranches of several days and then go back to other things.
And I did that when I was studying the Liszt Sonata with her.
So I got it to the point where I was playing it, but it was very unseasoned.
And she showed me this process and I did it daily one summer.
I think it was 1983. I'll never forget. The neighbors didn't like it.
I was living in an apartment and the neighbors didn't like hearing the Liszt Sonata every morning, so I'd get broomsticks on the door on the wall.
I do feel sorry for neighbors who have to listen to pianists practice.
But anyway, you know, after the first couple of days, I didn't notice any improvement at all. But I trusted this, she told me, by day five, day six.
Wow, this piece is getting shorter. This piece is getting easier. I can hold this piece in the palm of my hand.
And after about a week of doing it, she told me the next stage, which was to play it through twice in a row in one sitting.
And she told me about the Richter story. The Richter story was because she was a classmate or certainly they studied with the same teacher, Neuhaus.
Richter would play through his piece or his program ten times in a row without stopping.
Now, I don't recommend that because we're living in an age where we've got injuries, problems, and, you know, that's not good for the body to do that.
But I think what he would probably do would be to play it through fully once and then mark, just mark it through the second time, like a singer would do, you know, under the breath.
Yeah. And so what you've got then is something, a product at the end of that, which has been fully seasoned, stamina like you wouldn't believe.
And with obviously everything has a shadow side. So the shadow side of that would be overplaying, overuse. And unless you were free of injury or free of tension, that could cause problems.
I never had any such problems touch wood. Knock on wood, sorry.
So, but this was the rigor of the practicing a performance, getting ready for a performance, which I learned from her.
So you mentioned so back to back. So you just do the whole program from the beginning up to the end and then do it all over again.
Yes. Now I never managed to do it more than two or three times, but Richter apparently ten times in a row.
So let's say after if you were to text about half an hour to play no bathroom breaks or anything.
So if you're doing it ten times, you're sitting there for five hours. Not very healthy, actually.
Right. Yeah. Not recommend. Oh, no. So you don't recommend? No, I don't actually.
I'm just using it as an illustration of the rigor that some pianists of that generation would go through.
See, when a master pianist comes out onto the stage to perform, everything looks so effortless and so easy because it is.
But what they don't what the average audience member doesn't appreciate is what's gone into that.
There's a wonderful meme of iceberg where the tip of the iceberg is showing through the top of the waves and then the underneath.
Oh, I see. I've let off all sorts of balloons as I did that. The part of the iceberg is under the sea.
So this represents what the audience sees the tip of the iceberg and this represents what the work that's gone into it along the route.
That's why it looks it's not effortless, of course. Yeah, makes sense.
You know, I've been fortunately I'm teaching gifted students quite a bit before the last several years.
And that's I actually started watching your videos more and learned about different ways of practicing.
And that's why I really wanted to invite you to talk about all these things.
And then but when it comes to teaching them how to practice for the performance, we do so many different ways.
And, you know, play for this person, play for your friends and creative ways.
And we do that. But you're just the story that you shared.
Although I'm not going to make my students do to performance. Once is enough.
But it really helps. I understand they have to go through the program like one week of doing that every day.
Even that really helps. And then taking notes afterwards and then do the spot cleaning you mentioned.
Yes. Yeah. Yes. I had a student a little while back who was a very serious player, very serious and studious.
And she was preparing for her grade eight. I don't know if you know about the ABRSM exam system.
Yes, I'm familiar. Yes. OK. So she was preparing for her grade eight and she'd learned all the pieces very thoroughly.
And she came for a lesson and I said, right, let's have all three pieces just like you're going to have to do in the exam.
And I think it was the first time that she played through all pieces back to back.
So afterwards she was very disappointed and I could see why she was disappointed.
First of all, I could see that she was disappointed and I could see why.
And I said, Anna, I've got a little secret here for you now. What you're going to do is.
And I explained the day by day playing through the whole thing day by day.
And I said, you won't notice any improvement in the first couple of days, but trust me.
And so, OK, she went away. She was highly intelligent. She knew what she had to do.
She came back the next week. And as I opened the door to her, she was beaming.
She was absolutely glowing with delight.
And I could sense from that glowing smile that what I had shown her had worked for her.
And she was playing the three pieces absolutely wonderfully at the end of the week of doing that training.
But the other thing that Nina used to get us to do and funnily enough, a voice teacher who I used to play for in New York when I was a student did the same thing.
So just before a performance, he would, Nina and the voice teacher would make the student have three practice run throughs in front of a small audience, preferably on bad pianos.
Because we get so spoiled by having always beautiful timeways to perform on.
So you can get an upright, the pedal has to work, but it doesn't matter if it's not a particularly distinguished instrument.
And just being able to negotiate an instrument that's not perhaps optimal.
And you're dealing with the anxiety of being in a different place and having people listen to you.
And that, again, is part of the procedure for performance preparation.
You can't just take it out of the practice room and stick it on the road.
It's got to go through a seasoning process in the way.
Sure. And then I'm trying to do in the creative ways to really teach them that too.
You've got to get out of your comfortable practice room and then experience the real life-like performance.
Yeah, absolutely. And I've got this little thing I developed a while back.
Do you have, you probably have your own equivalent.
Here we've got something called Britain's Got Talent. Do you know that?
Oh, yeah, yeah. Talent show. Maybe it's America.
We have the American version. America's Got Talent, yes.
OK, so you've got three people who are judges and the person comes out and they do their act and then the judges give their feedback.
So what I did for the kids, at that point I was teaching more kids, was I made a little version of that.
Whereby the student came up with their own judges.
So I said, you've got a judge, a judge, B judge, C. Who do you want for judge A?
And they usually say, I want granny. So because granny is always kind to them.
You know, granny gives them money and granny gives them sweeties and things.
So granny is judge A and then often they'll choose some authority figure from school.
Maybe their their form teacher at school goes in as A and then somebody else's seat.
So then they do their play through and from their own perspective, they speak through each judge.
So they write a few little comments, what judge A would say.
Granny says it's really very good and it'll be fantastic on the day.
Maybe I just need to do a little bit more practice at the end.
And then judge B, who's the school teacher, said, yes, it's coming nicely,
but it needs a little bit of work just to make it even more tidy, whatever it whatever it is.
And these are not my words.
These are the students words as seen through these three judges of their own making.
So there's no way that the teacher is actually influencing that.
It's coming from within. And I found that they love doing that.
And they often find that that helps them a lot as you know, to progress for themselves.
Yeah, people telling them what to do. Right.
But that approach, once again, going back to student centered approach is so important
because the integration of what they are learning, you know, in the practical ways is so important.
But thank you for sharing all these stories and also practical tools.
They're really helpful for me.
And as well as I'm sure for those who are listening, who have been teaching for quite some time
and then really trying to find the ways to, you know, make improvements in their teaching as well.
So now I want to even go further into this practicality, which is piano technique, which is so important now.
Yes, it's a big subject. I know. I know.
Huge.
Huge. So instead of maybe getting into the nitty gritty of practical things, maybe philosophy would be great.
So, I mean, there are so many piano technique school of techniques out there.
Yeah, I'm very, very interested to know, because when I watch your videos,
they are really, really high quality production. And I truly, truly appreciate.
Now, you don't just go with one school of piano technique or, you know, taking a technical book.
You just have you have such an extensive knowledge of piano technique out there.
You've studied each one of them. So plus your neuroscientific insights,
which you mentioned that you're interested in and you're working with a neuroscientist and which is amazing.
So, yeah, I don't know. I want to know what's going on.
So how do you define piano technique and what do you see as ultimate purpose in serving both the music and the performer?
Wow. OK, let me see if I can dig into that a bit.
Yeah, piano techniques plural, because the you know, I don't believe in a one size fits all approach to piano technique.
You only have to look at the great pianists who are playing to see that the masters,
a mastery of the piano can come from any number of different national schools of playing.
So you've got the French school, which is certainly in the old days had a kind of more of a fixation on finger technique.
And then you've got the Russian school, which he was obsessed with sound and usually big sound.
So lots of arm. And then you've got various other more modern techniques, which are all fantastic in themselves.
And, you know, there are certain precepts, I think, that come out of it.
To understand these, we've got to go back a little bit into the history of piano teaching.
When you think about the earliest piano teachers with Clementi, they were they were teaching on the new piano,
the new piano, which was just coming out of the harpsichord.
So they taught using a harpsichord technique, which is now you will get some people who will disagree with this.
But basically, you can't use any arm weight or any movement into the key from the arm or wrist on the harpsichord.
It looks like it's mostly fingers, although you could argue that there would be micro movements of, you know,
rotational movements or whatever else would be involved in that.
But basically, the technique is much more from the finger.
So what do Czerny and Clementi do?
They formulate a system of playing the keyboards that they had, which made sense to the keyboard that they had, you know.
The elbows were in by the side.
Well, you could do that because if you you could reach the edges of the you can't see me, but you could reach usually F to F.
You can reach that with your elbows in by your side.
You could do most stuff with the fingers.
And that's how they were trained.
And then as the pianos began to get a little heavier, the action was getting a little heavier.
The keyboard was getting a little longer.
I'm not sure if this was Czerny possibly, but he invented it could have been Clementi invented a technique called little hammers,
which was the actions getting a bit heavier.
We need to strengthen the fingers. Well, they didn't know anything about neuroscience.
They didn't know anything about anatomy.
This book hadn't yet come out.
I'm going to flash this on the screen.
Do you know the Thomas Mark?
What every pianist needs to know about the body?
Well, I highly recommend that book.
So what happened was that they they thought sensible, you know, well, let's lift the finger high and lift each finger high.
And then, you know, will there but there will strengthen the fingers that maybe that worked for a little bit for a while.
But trouble was that that idea went far beyond its expiration date and is still being taught now.
That's the problem with it.
It's still being taught as the way to play, which is to lift the fingers high and with precision.
Now, why is it still being taught now?
Partly because somebody's some Mr. X's teacher taught that because their teacher taught them that.
And so you trace it back to, you know, Adam and Eve or Clemente and Cheney.
It's out of respect for one's elders, out of respect for tradition.
So it's difficult to break with tradition.
Not only that, but also if you go to any music shop now, any music store and you let's say you ask the assistant, I've got weak fingers.
I play the piano, got weak fingers.
What would you recommend?
Chances are they'll throw you a book of Hannon.
Right. So you open the Hannon and you see the instructions that you see there are to do with old school lifting fingers, which died out or should have died out a century ago more.
And yet there it is in black and white, a brand new book that tells them to lift the fingers high and with precision.
So what do they do?
They sit there and they lift their fingers up like this and they feel virtuous doing so.
But they they don't realize that unless they're doing that, those Hannon exercises in particular ways.
Now there are ways of doing them that can be, I don't use them, but they can be helpful.
Let's say you take exercise number one.
I'll do it on the back of my hand and you do it the wrong way.
That's going to do you harm.
But if you do it with a little bit of lateral adjustment, it can do you good.
If you do it with a wrist circle like this, perfectly fine.
It's just a pattern of notes.
It's an innocuous pattern of notes that moves from one position to the other and actually can be very useful in teaching, provided you don't do what it says on the tin.
So, you know, I've now matted on for so long I've forgotten the first part of your question.
But I think what a lot of people are doing is teaching old school technique.
Oh, yeah, I know. I'm now back on track.
So what we've learned, what we've learned, I think, is the buzzword alignment.
But even before that, nothing in the finger without the arm, the involvement of the arm and nothing in the arm without the finger.
So it's like a combination of fingers and arm together, this together.
This, some people say, no, it's only up to the elbow.
Others, oh, it's the shoulder, it's the back, and then you'll get people screaming and shouting each other in disagreement.
So, you know, you're never going to get, you know, everybody agreeing on this thing.
But the basic principles, I think, are involvement of the arm.
Be that through lateral adjustments of the wrist so that if I'm playing my, let's say I'm playing a five finger position, I and I play in thumb alignment like this.
It's great for fingers one, two, three, but it fingers four and five feel weak.
Actually had an example of somebody bringing in something recently.
Beta, the note was 14, number one, E major development section where the left hand has, can you place it?
The left hand has some common chords that are broken up, sort of Albert, not Alberti style, but, you know, from the lowest note to the highest note and repeating, repeating.
And before she even started, she said, I'm going to need you to show me some exercises to improve the strength of my fourth and fifth fingers, which are very weak.
And I smiled inwardly and asked her to play the spot and she played it and she was fixed in thumb alignment.
And of course, five and four are going to feel weak.
So I said, let's just see if we can free this up a little bit.
And I just got her to move laterally and it was like, wow, I asked her, does your fourth finger feel weak now?
No, no, because she was the arm was behind that finger as she was playing it.
Then we explored wrist circles.
Then we explored some rotational movements.
And then we I asked her to sort of go back and noodle with those ideas and see if her body would come up with a way of assimilating all of that that made made sense for her.
You know, like a pinch of this, a little bit of that level teaspoon of this and her body then coordinated.
So by the time she came back next week, it was flowing beautifully.
It was no problem with weakness in the finger.
But if I hadn't challenged that, I would have looked at her and said, yes, your fourth finger is weak.
Let's do Hannon, which would have been completely the wrong thing to have told her to do and wouldn't have helped her at all.
So, you know, the idea of alignment and what other things are bad?
Well, unhelpful stretching out, you know, when people do this, they, you know, you've seen this, I'm sure.
So move, move the forearm to the place.
And certainly we're not lifting fingers up like this.
What else?
You know, and just this this this idea that we have to do whole loads of dry and boring exercises, which we don't.
I mean, I grew up Hannon and Cheney and none of them really.
I don't know. Did it work? I'm not sure.
But I had to do it. And then there's like a whole hierarchy of, you know, start with Hannon and then do Cheney this opus and that, you know, you have to get to this Cheney number 60, like volume of 60.
That's the highest. And after that, finally, you're going to be able to play Chopin etude.
But by the time you're like old, older, that, you know, you could have done Chopin etude much earlier, you know, and then learn from the masterpiece.
Right. Exactly.
And you see, it's a fallacy to assume that or to believe that let's say you're doing whole loads of octave exercises, you know, this type of octave, that type of octave.
And then you come to, let's say, the Chopin octave etude.
Marta Argrich even said the same thing. She never did any exercises. And you may say, well, she's a special case. She certainly is.
She's an extraordinarily special case. But she did say that, you know, you could do all the octave exercises in the world when you come to this particular octave passage in this piece, you have to organize it from scratch.
You can't transfer those skills. You can't assume that you can transfer those skills across.
You know who I would, what I would recommend is a wonderful book that I've just finished reading by Walter Ponce, P-O-N-C-E.
I apologize to him for mispronouncing his name, but it's called The Tyranny of Tradition in Piano Teaching.
You must get him on here, you hear me? Get him on your podcast.
He's very much on the other end of, you know, don't, don't, you don't need to do these things.
Or you could take a more of a middle path. You could say, as I have done, I do, maybe a little bit by way of studies and exercises for a particular reason.
And find good ones. I prefer Moskovsky actually than Czerny. Czerny can be very dry, boring.
And the trouble is the material, if the material is not engaging, who's going to want to practice it?
You know?
Yeah, yeah, yeah. So I don't do Czerny anymore. But yeah, so, there's so much to talk about.
So I learned this technique as a young adult. It's just basically using arm weight to play the piano, which helped me tremendously.
Because, you know, after going through Hannon and everything, that was a groundbreaking thing.
Now, but what happened was, this technique, I believe, is made for someone petite, particularly.
Yeah, so I am 170 centimeter tall, 172 centimeter tall, which is 5'8 in the United States. So I'm tall.
And then, so, but I was told to sit a little higher. So the elbow has to come a little higher than the keys.
So basically, almost like it looks like Rubinstein would play, like he would play like so. But it just didn't work for me.
And it was a journey of really discovery. And then I had a privilege of learning from Eduard Salim, who is the last student of Horowitz.
And he really was much later in my life, but taught me about certain ways to play. And then it really clicked me. I'm not saying I'm this genius and I understand everything.
No, that's not what I mean. But physique wise, I'm tall, I have long fingers. So it made sense the way he showed me.
But body weight obviously helped. And I did a tremendous amount of spending using body weight and, you know, circular motion, in and out motion.
Yes. And using entire upper body, especially the arm to play the piano. But just using arm to learning arm motion actually doesn't work either. Right.
No, no. So if you go back to the history of piano teaching, so the finger school was what we call the finger school, the Czerny-Klementy,
then they realized that didn't work with the, it was the Stuttgart Piano School, I think somewhere around the 1850s, Leibert and Stark, were very earnest people.
But they took the finger idea to its illogical conclusion, all these contraptions that you were supposed to use to strengthen the fingers, you know.
Mechanical devices, the handrail, which was totally misguided. And of course, everybody was reporting injuries and it was a total disaster.
And then that fizzled out. And then you get the arm weight school where people sort of flopped around the keyboard with no fingers at all.
That didn't work either. And then you get you start to get schools of piano teaching, piano pedagogy, where things got started to get combined.
So fingers and arm, of course, but not just that, the imagination, the central nervous system, all of these elements that had been sort of separated off.
And now starting to be incorporated. And I think modern piano technique is very much geared toward the modern instrument.
Finally, it's caught up. I'd love to, can I read you a tiny little thing from, because can I read you from the, is this allowed on copyright?
The Thomas Mark?
I think so. Go for it.
Yeah. And so it's a paragraph. I'll read it. So saying that we play the piano with our fingers is like saying that we run with our feet.
The fingers move when we play the piano and they are the only parts of the upper body that touch the piano.
Similarly, our feet move when we run and are the only parts that touch the ground.
But a runner who tried to improve his running by keeping his legs motionless and doing foot exercises would be ridiculous.
He is similar to a pianist who keeps his arms motionless and exercises his fingers.
Although what the pianist does has the sanction of tradition.
We play the piano just as we run by complex coordinated movements of our whole bodies.
I love that. I think that just sums it up beautifully.
Can you tell us again, show us again the book?
Yes. So it's by Thomas Mark and it's called What Every Pianist Needs to Know About the Body. You can get it in the next.
If you go on Amazon, you can get it by tomorrow morning. It's published by GIA Publications, Inc.
And it looks like that. Yeah.
Right. Great.
So, yeah. So that's a book I highly recommend people look at because it's also got a section on there for organists.
Because we're still getting, I'm sure you're getting the same, people coming through the door with fingers that just operate from like little pistons from the end.
You mentioned in and out movements. I mean, that for me is so vital.
You know, we've got long fingers and short fingers.
I had a colleague who is a very famous celebrated concert pianist. I won't mention his name, who was injured for most of his career.
And he would play with the big conductors. We're talking about, you know, a couple of generations back.
And he would be in the green room with towels wrapped around him and poor soul, you know.
And then he would, the call would come, he'd take the towels off, go and play his concerto magnificently, I gather.
And then, you know, put his towels back on. And then he told me one day, he said, I had a sudden realization about the piano keyboard and that I hadn't ever seen before.
And I thought, what could it be, you know, somebody at the pinnacle of the career suddenly having a realization about the piano keyboard?
And I couldn't wait to hear what it was. I was thinking it was going to be something amazingly, you know, arcane.
But he said, I suddenly realized that the black keys were higher up and further away.
I mean, from there he was able to change his whole technique because he was rooting for the black keys, causing tension rather than moving up.
You know, very simple, really. But if your training has told you otherwise, you'd be going against your training to move up and in, you know.
I have so much thought on that. So I've learned all that, you know, to adjust your position, right?
So instead of stretching your fingers to reach for, you know, black keys or right in, twist your wrist.
Although Chopin, sometimes, you know, he, Eduardo's taught me his way of playing is like you kind of have to twist your wrist to do it.
But it's not really. Yeah, because especially like Etude Opus 10, number two, A minor, derriere.
Annoying. Yeah. You kind of have to twist a little bit. It's so annoying that Etude. Anyway.
Well, so there's a difference between something where let's say there's a little adjustment that lasts for a nanosecond and then it comes back into alignment.
That's fine. It's a little bit like the wrist. Now, I know there are some schools of piano teaching that forbid this, but the Russian school and there's no slouches in the Russian school.
Go through the wrist like this. So at that moment, the wrist is like I can't even do it at that moment.
The wrist may be lower, but it comes immediately back up so that it's not fixed in a position.
I think that's the danger is when you fix in a position.
So there's bound to be moments when there's a little bit of, you know, yeah, I would.
Now, then in this new school, so we have done research, you know, so many of us have done research.
So the blend of, you know, not limited to finger movements, but our movement, but not just doing this arm balance, arm movement, arm weight thing.
But now, so in the modern time, blending all these, what would be the great exercises to do?
Or should we just do the technical things from the literature, directly from the literature?
Wow. Yeah, you see, I'm not a great believer in whole loads of exercises and studies, unless there are artists, art studies,
like the shop on the list or something like the Moskovsky, which, you know, I forgot the Opus number.
I could probably reach for them.
Opus 70 something or 90.
Yeah. I wonder if I can reach for them.
Yes, I well, I don't want to go.
Please take your time. Please take your time to reach for them.
Or S, these are all alphabetized here. No, I think I'd have to stand up. What's that? That's still Mozart. My arms aren't quite long enough to reach Moskovsky.
I think you know the ones I mean, there's two, two steps.
Is it the shorter ones?
Yes, the shorter ones.
But the shorter ones would make a very good substitute for the sort of more advanced, cheney ones or not even more advanced, intermediate and up.
I've got in front of me something that I like to do, which is, I don't know if this is visible here, Rudolf Gans.
Now, OK, you have to be terribly careful with these. You can only get them on IMSLP, a Petrucci Library.
You can't buy them, but you can, you know, scan them. And I got these printed off.
There's one particular one that comes from Blanchet, Ami Blanchet, 36, that I have been doing for a while.
And to warm up, just to warm up in the first thing in the morning, you know, when I want to practice, there's several things I would do to warm up this.
I can show you a little bit. It's if you should find this PDF and you can, you can get it.
It's on page 36. And I saw, interestingly, I saw Marc-André Hamelin use this and discuss this and talk about it.
So you could probably search for him on YouTube. And he likes to do this. It's this.
So it's it's very non-stretchy, but it's got it involves each hand in two parts.
So you've got five, four, three, five, four, three, five, four, three, and you've got one, two, one, two underneath it in note values that are half.
So eights on the top, quarters underneath. And you have to think.
And but there's no stretching involved. There's no lifting of the fingers involved.
But it really is fantastic for setting the hand up if you just go out of bed and you want to warm up a bit.
So I believe in things like doing some chords. I love doing chords.
Nina used to get us to do this. Just go through the common chords in all their inversions.
And she was very insistent that the chords be fingers were engaged in the chords.
So there's a imagine I've got a chord under my hand here. I pluck the chord and then physically there's no tension at all.
So I release the tension and the effort rather immediately and then go through and then I can go very fast like this actually.
And then up two octaves, down two octaves major, up two octaves, down two octaves minor.
You can change the color of the sound. You can change the lengths.
So that I find incredibly wonderful for warming up.
I think they're doing huge amounts of finger exercises. I would never do finger exercises, although I do like my double thirds.
I do very much like my double thirds, but I issue a health warning with them.
Here's what this is interesting, because I remember observing one of Claudio Arau's students talking about something they call the wrist vibration of the wrist,
which is a very fast you probably can't even see it. So with the double thirds, what you'd first do would be to drop.
Notice that when I drop, I'm not dropping my wrist lower than level, so I'm starting a little higher.
So in each pair of thirds, not only am I dropping through my wrist, but I'm aligning through the wrist.
So there's a tiny little adjustment that goes through the wrist.
And then as I get faster, the movements get, I can't do it here, the movements get smaller and smaller until I feel like I'm vibrating.
And that way there's no effort at all. There's no finger effort at all, because again, nothing by arm without finger, nothing by finger without arm.
The arm, in this case, the rubberized wrist, is pulsating very, very quickly through to the fingers.
And I get this exhilarating feeling of being able to play fast and loud if I wanted to, double thirds.
Yes, and that is again something that I like to use as a warm up, because double thirds are great, aren't they?
You know, it's wonderful for coordinating the fingers within the hand.
So this, going back to this Blanchet exercise that you find in the Rudolf Gans set, does just that.
It's two things, two elements going on in the hand at the same time. I think that's more useful.
Yeah, I need to check. I'm asking all these questions because I truly, truly respect your expertise and the wide range of knowledge and your research.
So it's just endless. Anyway, then, you know, now I want to talk about piano technique and neuroscience, right?
So, okay, here we go. Now, when I was, I believe a couple months ago, we talked on the phone, discussing the content of this show, and I totally enjoyed it.
Even like that phone conversation in and of itself could become another episode.
Anyway, well, I didn't record it. So, oh well.
But you mentioned that the, oh, you know, you can be, so where does this, you think the physical tension come from?
I'm like, I don't know. Just, we just practice too much and then we get tight. But you said it's actually more mental?
Ah, I think there are two things to say about that. Tension can be physical and it manifests itself physically by tightened muscles or, you know, locked positions kind of thing.
But often it comes from the mind. The mind is fearful. I can give you a very good example of this, actually. Very good example. My own experience.
So, many years ago, I was, when I was a student at the Royal College of Music, my professor had assigned Lille Joyeuse of Debussy for me to learn.
And he said, let's hear that. And he gave me a date whenever it was that he wanted to hear it.
So, I diligently learned it. I was very, very diligent as a student. I like to think I still am, but, you know, I was very, very diligent in my practice and I wanted to please him.
I wanted to show him how, you know, what a good job we've done. So, anyway, I was playing it fine at home, you know, this whole thing about, but I can play it perfectly well at home.
Right. So, I go in for my lesson and give him the score and play and I'm so disappointed, you know. I'm so, it's nowhere near where it was the day before at home.
And I'm thinking, oh, there's something fundamentally wrong with my technique or there's something fundamentally wrong with me.
And he is very wise and a very kind teacher. You know, not every teacher is kind. He was very kind.
Now, he said to me, okay, Graham, I'd like you to play it again now. And I'd like you to try and make as many mistakes as you possibly can.
Try and, you know, fill it with wrong notes and splashes and slops and everything else. I was, oh, okay.
So then I played it again immediately with no practice or anything. All he had done was to flip a switch in my brain.
And I wouldn't say it was flawless. I wouldn't say it was recorded, you know, recording quality performance, but it was chalk and cheese.
I don't know if you have that expression in the US. Total contrast. One was physically tight and locked.
And a piano teacher was looking at me would say, oh, but you're not moving here or you're not doing this.
But the second version was free and enjoyable and effortless. And it was how I practiced. What was different?
Mindset. So with a fearful mindset, what happens is that the body is flooded with various chemicals.
I think it's adrenaline being one of them. Various other things that literally do take the blood supply away from the small muscles and give it to the legs and to that heart.
Because we need to run away from the tiger that we're afraid of. We're endowed with superhuman strength.
But not when it comes to playing the piano. It rather gets in the way of playing the piano.
So I experienced tightness in my muscles and stiffness, but it was because of the chemical that my brain had pumped out into my body.
So, you know, I will find that positive self-talk and positive talk from the teacher, both those can go a long way to alleviating some of the negative stuff.
You know, often teachers are just very unkind.
You know, I thought I told you before that that should be the you should do this fingering or whatever or no, no, no, no, the kind of thing.
Rather say to the student, I see you're still having a little problem with that. See if I can help you loosen that up or something.
In other words, the attitude of let's roll up our sleeves together and, you know, collaborate on sorting out this thing rather than acting from it from an egotistical place,
which a lot of teachers do. And I think it's because they've they've received that themselves.
They've received a kind of baggage from their teacher, who's it's probably unresolved psychological stuff from the from the teachers didn't get resolved properly.
So then it gets thrown out. I can't handle it. You know, it's all unconscious anyway.
So the student has to deal with it and the student and if they're smart, will sort it out before they pass it on to their students.
And it often doesn't happen that way. So, yes, tension. I think tension can come from all those things that we looked at.
Keybedding, in other words, pushing into the keyboard, physical tension, I mean, lifting the fingers in isolation from each other.
That's horrible. And yet it's part of our tradition.
Stretching between the fingers, you know, that twisting all those things that are just physiologically bad for us will cause physical tension.
But it's I don't think physical tension is exclusively physical. I think a lot of the time it comes from our mind.
Well, that is interesting. I mean, we can go further into this topic, but, you know, I still want to learn more about different aspects of teaching.
So we have to keep going. But before we going into the next segment, I want to do a quick round of rapid fire.
Usually that usually this comes at the end of our conversation, but I'm curious to know.
I want you to answer them either yay or nay. I will just dump all the traditional to new school of technique.
And I want you to say yay or nay. It's your yes. Can I qualify it with a little something at the end or not?
Sure. You can. You can do that. Yes. OK. OK. So first one, Hannah, yay or nay.
It depends on how you do it. OK. Yes, I understand that. Pishna.
I don't really have never used Pishna, so I wouldn't. Charny. Charny.
Again, some of it. Some of it's good. And do it in moderation. Don't binge on it. Kramer's etude.
Yeah, the more useful ones again, maybe half of maybe the first four bars of chunks of them.
Don't any. Some of them. Some of them are right. Some of them avoid the stretchy ones.
Oscar Beringer or Beringer. Again, it's the same sort of thing. They're all much the same.
When used sensibly, they can be good. When they're done well, they can be of use.
Great. OK. Now here are maybe is this myth or we should do it. Scales and arpeggios.
Oh, yeah, we definitely need to know our scales and arpeggios for sure.
Yeah, thank you. I'm going to I'm going to show this to my students.
All right. Next one. Bartok's microcosmos.
Oh, it's fantastic. Yes. If it's again, if it's presented imaginatively, it's amazing.
The little structures there. Beautiful. List technical exercises.
I don't think he really believed in them, actually. I don't think he did. He threw them together toward the end.
I mean, he thought, oh, everybody else is writing technical exercises. Let me write them.
They're sort of a recycling of what everybody else has done. I don't think many people do them today.
No, but I have this really thick book of his exercises. They're quite challenging.
Probably useful for doorstop. Corteau, rational principles of piano forte technique.
I have a soft spot for some of Corteau. The rational principles, maybe not,
but certainly his study editions of Chopin, if done very, very cautiously, some of it can be wonderful.
Now, the art of piano playing by Heinrich. I've been calling his last name Newhouse, but.
Well, Neuhaus, or if you're Russian, it's Negals. Now, that was my teacher's teacher.
I'd love to be able to tell you something about this. Maybe at the end of the rapid fire, I can tell you something more about that book.
But that book, absolutely. Yes, yes. OK. Two thumbs up. More thumbs if I had them. Great.
So now two more. Alberto Hona's Master School of Piano Playing and Virtuosity.
It's astonishing what he's got there. There's some really marvelous things in there.
But again, it's but it's there's so much gymnastic stuff there that I'm wondering if life might be a bit too short.
Moderate. Yes, it's quite expensive. It's extensive. Yes, I know.
Now, last one, Gramthage, practicing the piano dot com. Oh, it should be on every pianist's shelves.
Yes, definitely. Yes, it's the best. OK, so tell tell us more about that Neuhaus, Heinrich Neumann.
Heinrich Neuhaus. Now, OK, so go back to I'm now going back to when I was a kid.
I didn't start till I was quite late, so it's quite old. But I had a fascination for piano and piano playing.
We didn't have a piano at home, but I used to go down to my local library, which was in a very rural part of, you know,
the suburb of London, put it that way. And there was this book on on the shelf, Neuhaus, the Art of Piano Playing.
I was constantly taking this book out and renewing it, putting it either to take it back and then put it back on the shelf.
And then I don't I've lost count on how many how many times I took that book out and read it.
And I was absolutely fascinated by it. I love it.
And then little did I realize that years later I was going to end up studying with one of his students, which I did.
Nina Svetlanova was a longtime student of the great Neuhaus.
And so I have a real kind of soft spot for Neuhaus. But you'd mentioned something else in the list.
You've got down here the Walter Gieseking Piano Technique. Oh, yes, yes, yes. I skipped it by accident.
You skipped it. OK. So this goes back to what we were talking about at the toward the beginning.
You know, the thing is, this book's called Piano, Walter Gieseking and Carl Leimer, his teacher, Gieseking's teacher, L-E-I-M-E-R.
It's an old book. You can get it, I think, for nothing on IMSLP.
OK, it's called Piano Technique. Show me where it talks about physical movements.
It doesn't really talk about physical movements at the piano, the bits that I'm thinking of anyway.
It talks about mental practice.
He's got an analysis of the C major two part invention of Bach where he is quite dry.
You have to be in the mood for it. You've really got to be.
You've got to get your kick somewhere else that day because it's a very, very dry approach.
But it's it's led me to recommend it to students.
And then the students will come back and say, I was able to memorize great swathes of my Beethoven sonata thanks to this approach.
What it does is it's basically an analysis of the patterns that one sees in the school.
So I'm sure most of your listeners, viewers will know the two part invention of Bach.
So we're starting on the keynote C and then Bach goes up four steps from the C to the F.
And then he dips down by skip one note. Then he goes up another step.
And otherwise, he's describing verbally.
OK, so can I shift this into another gear and just go into a little anecdote about a Leon Fleischer class that I was privileged to be in.
I was in Fleischer's class for a year at Peabody, his class for piano majors.
There was one I would call it a miraculous class where somebody was playing the Appassionata Sonata of Beethoven.
And Leon Fleischer went around the room, crowded out with pianists, and he asked everybody to state a fact from what they saw on the score, just the first eight measures, I think it was.
So one person said both hands are in unison.
The next person said and two octaves apart, the next person would say until measure two when there's a chord.
And then the next person would say, oh, and that chord is the dominant in its first inversion.
And then it would go around the room until everybody had said something and then you'd go around the room again until we'd exhausted all the possibilities of analysis for that opening.
And it was wonderful. And I did this myself at a piano teacher's course. I was doing a workshop on memorization.
And I had the score up on the board, you know, the white board, and we did the same thing.
Everybody said something and I was packing my stuff away to go to leave the room and I was chatting with somebody over here.
And then one of the students went up to the piano.
There was no score there and he didn't have the score and he found himself able with never having touched the score, never having touched that sonata of playing after a couple of fumbling starts.
He was able to play the first eight measures of that sonata and was dumbfounded. His mouth, his jaw was dropped.
He could not believe that he could do all of that by brain rather than muscle.
Right. So, you know, this, this book talks about mental practice because I have found that a lot of piano students seem to think what they've got to do is to drill stuff into their muscles.
We've got muscle memory. We've got oral memory. We've got brain memory and the brain memory is the one that gets neglected.
So I've come up with my own terminology for that. I call it PPR personalized pattern recognition.
Because what I notice today is different from what I might notice tomorrow and it's different from what the next person might notice.
You know, so what I try and tell my students is muscles last. Can you hear it first? Play it with the wrong hand if you want.
Hear it first. Analyze it in whatever way is meaningful. It can be a quick and dirty analysis.
Then attach the muscles of the fingering arm and work on muscle memory so that you know, rather than relying on muscle memory, which is so easy come easy go, isn't it?
We've all experienced that, but I can play it perfectly well at home.
And then you play it in front of, you know, play a memorized performance and you forget because it's not bedded in here or here. Just bedded in here enough.
Wow, that's fascinating. I definitely need to explore this further. Thank you for sparking my curiosity.
Now let's talk about your extensive research practicing the piano online academy.
It's an amazing online resource that anyone can go to and then start searching for something.
Your, you know, online academy has become an invaluable resource for pianists worldwide. And what inspired you to create this platform and what gap in the piano teaching industry were you hoping to address?
Right. So, okay. So there was a point in my life when I wanted to just start doing a blog. I thought I was not not many people.
Well, there were some people that were doing piano blogs back in, what was it, 15 years ago there were, but they mostly seem to focus on technique.
And I thought, okay, so for me practicing is the technique of learning.
Let me write a blog called practicing the piano so I got the domain name and started writing and then I realized, ah, so we English spell it practicing with an S, the Americans spell it practicing with a C.
So I would start to get emails from people to say, don't you know how to spell practicing with a C.
So anyway, we then found the domain name that was practicing with a C as well so you could search for it either way. You'll still come up with the same site practicingthepiano.com.
I would write weekly blog posts and seem to get quite a lot of traction. People were very interested in it. And then after a while, I started to collaborate with a former student actually who came on board with it and encouraged me to write ebooks.
So there are four volumes called practicing the piano in ebook form, which you can get by either you can just get them by themselves as standalones or as part of a membership subscription rather to the online academy, which if you go toward, go to practicingthepiano.com, in there there will be a tab directing you to the online academy.
Now that has grown exponentially since we started it.
I'm trying to even remember what we did at the start, but it's basically video based there's not huge amount of text to wade through. So, for example, the latest ABRSM graded syllabus that they're over there.
I went through and did video walkthroughs of most of the syllabus and they some of these videos are quite long. They could be 30 40 minutes and they're divided up into various chapters, if you will.
So I look at not just the technical side but also how we can practice how we might practice these these pieces, the structure the musical structure I like to introduce a little bit of harmony here and there a little bit of theory, not too much, just enough to add interest
to engagement, and we will talk about narrative musical narrative what's the piece about what's it describing or what could it be describing so there's a whole kind of package there in the video walkthroughs we've also got technical video walkthroughs some of them are in the form of courses,
where you look at little tiny videos minimal text videos. And then you can move on from that to the next video when you've mastered the particular thing that we're looking at.
So we've got on board we've got people like William Westney we've got a Dina Mornell who I'm working with, and Fred Carpoff, various contributors who contribute their own material and it's all under one umbrella it's all under one, you know, one site.
Yeah, there's all sorts of different stuff that is technique the style the psychology, there is theory. We've got Lona Kozik on board with theory she does that in such a way that people are absolutely in love with her because she makes theory relevant and interesting and, you know,
want to learn more about theory and I found myself saying at a recent summer school. Wow. Cut a lot of tutoring I found myself saying, the more theory you understand the easier it is to play the piano, which I believe to be true.
But not dry theory, theory as it as it's applied to music. So we do also do online workshops were on zoom, and the recordings get sent out afterwards to the participants.
In house, you know, events in the past but we probably will again at some point but quite a lot of workshops, talking about particular subjects, the next ones I'm doing are coming up fairly soon, and they'll be on the practice tools, applying the practice tools.
So there will be me demonstrating a particular practice tool. And then there will be a breakout session where the participants go to their instruments and I kind of eavesdrop and listen in and give them a few pointers if they need it and we come together at the end and discuss
discoveries challenges whatever. And then the next practice tool. Little demonstration from me, they go off and try it. And that sort of thing and people have really loved those because they're structured but you know they they get to try things out in the privacy of their
own studios, because it's zoom.
Sure. Now, so if I have any. So, let's say things. Maybe my student is working on the Debussy Prelude or something like that. For example, or, you know, about Sherbert impromptu for example.
And then as a teacher, even when I practice Oh, I have a question about this interpretation, or maybe had the way to practice then. Can I just type in search bar.
Yeah.
Yeah, we don't. We don't have all the piano repertoire yet. Give us another 10 years we've got enough, and we've got quite a lot. But for example you mentioned the Sherbert impromptu so I just did a video walkthrough of the G flat impromptu, where I, I think probably if you look at the whole thing
it would be certainly over an hour it's in three videos, probably way over an hour, where you know you can get information on the structure of the piece some the harmonies the chords some of the beautiful things that Schubert does harmonically, the texture
the peddling the fingering, and the practicing, and, and I'm hope I hope that it's inspiring to people it's that what they get from it is inspiration, as well as information.
Yeah, so we've got tons of tons of things like that video walkthrough is just video it's.
You know other things as well. Yeah, I'm just curious to know the difference between practicing the piano.com and inform us.
It's like the parent site if you will the business side of it that runs. I'm not even sure what that is either.
But it's, yeah, it's the umbrella, the business account and then, if you go to practicing the piano.com everything will be, you can get to.
Yes. Okay. Yeah, for example if I'm maybe if you tap one link that list leads to course or something then that maybe directs to inform us.biz.
Maybe yes, it is right. Yeah. Yeah. What's the difference between like a subscription like if I subscribe a month.
Then you get this, like a certain amount of videos per month. So what happened. No, you get full access.
I'm interestingly enough I don't deal with the business side of it but if you would go on the site you can see the various subscription offers we've got you know you can if you subscribe for longer is cheaper.
So we've got many people who subscribe for a lot of people will may start off taking a monthly or three monthly subscription and then realize that there's tons of stuff on there they're never going to get through, not even a fraction of it at a time.
So then they realize, oh, it's actually really good value to take out an annual subscription, and most of these are renewed most people renew them.
And I've had many people say to me with particularly piano teachers have said are this really one of the best resources we've got.
And they, they, they're very grateful for it, but also pianists who want to know repertoire and they want to learn how to approach a piece, how to practice how to solve problems technical problems there's lots of things there that we do.
And again it's multiple multiple contributors.
Wow, not just not just me droning on.
That's exactly what we need as pianists because we are, we practice by ourselves and sometimes we need a community or encouragement or some sort of guidelines or, you know, guide us.
Yeah, to practice. Yeah, that's great. Yeah.
Yeah, and I know you mentioned your for discount code.
Yes, so I think what we'll do is if we could, I don't have that to hand but if we could put that in the description below, wherever you put it on your piano blog on YouTube it can go on the description.
Yes.
Yeah, I think you'll get like a 30 pounds British pounds off an annual subscription. I have that code and I have the link as well so I will put that in the description.
Wow, this is great. So, then also you have like a teacher training.
Yes, one thing, one thing that we, I'm a part of is, it's called the piano teachers course UK. Again you can find that out just by googling it piano teachers course UK.
I'm now a guest presenter guest lecturer I was at one point, you know, a full tutor on that course but what happens is we sort of rotate every few years and new tutors come on.
And it's just astonishing piano teachers course I can think of it's a part time, and we get people coming on, who are maybe just graduates from the conservatories and they need more than the conservatories give them in terms of teaching piano resources,
we get people maybe who are doing career changes, they get to retirement and they want to do want to learn how to be piano teachers, or, you know, people who want to supplement their regular work as musicians with teaching and they want to do it properly.
So, we because we've got many different tutors each, each has their own area of specialization so we've got the Lucinda Macliff young who's wonderful with the improvisation playing by ear, psychology side.
We've got. I don't want to list, each of them but everybody's got their own particular skills. And it's, there are almost more tutors and there are two T's we don't call them students.
There's probably one tutor for every five to T so there's a lot of individual attention. And you'll see that there's some residential course, but we since coded we've we've done quite a lot of hybrid so people from overseas are doing it as well we've got people
from Hong Kong, who take the course and rave about it and people who from the US some some are doing it and then. So you can go to the residential. If you're in the UK, or you can do it online.
And then there are some areas of the course some components of the course with it just online, so you do that from from a zoom platform. So it's a hybrid course now.
So, speaking of hybrid course so you, you know you have this extensive private practice teaching, and then you also teach online lessons, connect, you know, yes, I love to be.
Yeah, tell us more. Yeah, well I love I love doing online teaching because I've made friends with students that I've got to know only through through the internet and it's amazing how you can form relationships, just the same through the internet
so I've got students that I see in Australia in Switzerland in America various parts of the US, all over the place to see me for lessons Malaysia. And what we do is we do this on the zoom platform.
You don't need fancy equipment, you just need, I've got a little bit more fancy equipment but you just need a good external microphone I like the Blue Yeti.
You just, you can use your laptop you don't even need an external camera. It's helpful to have a wired internet connection but it's again not mandatory, provided you've got a good microphone, I can hear through the Blue Yeti every little detail of peddling
I can hear what you're doing.
People are surprised how did you hear that. Well, the microphone is good now, nowadays and I think if it hadn't been for lockdown we wouldn't have got the technology that we have.
So I'm working with pianists they can be professional pianists that a lot of piano teachers, and a lot of amateur pianists that come to me, and I don't distinguish between them I don't have any sort of tier system that, oh that's only an amateur I love the amateurs
the passion that an amateur pianist would have for playing the piano is to me just as valuable and just as valid as the training that a, you know, a piano teacher would need or a advanced student or even not an advanced student.
So I'm working with the whole range of levels of ability, ages, and give everybody exactly the same attention.
Yeah. Yeah, so if you're interested in contacting me for that reason you can do that also via the link in the description.
The online account, practicing the piano.
Yeah, great. Now, so, as we are closing up this episode, I want to just ask one or two more.
Yes, go ahead. Your career spans decades of performing, you know, we didn't get to talk about performance so much but you're, you're on concert pianist and also you're obviously teaching, you are such a great writer, leaving an incredible mark on the piano world
and then you're still young, but when you reflect on everything you've accomplished. What do you hope your legacy will be.
Wow, okay. Right, well, going back to some of what you said there, I'm doing less and less playing now out of choice than I at one point did when my stomach was stronger for that sort of thing.
You know when you're teaching a lot and writing a lot and your mind is on other things. I haven't got the time to be sitting there practicing all day, as I used to do.
So, so my, my legacy would be more in, I think, empowering people to play the piano freely, whether that means, you know, physically at the instrument, definitely psychologically.
I'm very concerned that I treat everybody kind like to think that I treat everybody with, with kindness and respect. And I'm very non judgmental in my teaching I don't judge anybody so they people soon get used to that idea that he's not actually judging me he's helping me.
So, assisting and facilitating and just notice that helping people to realize that there's no such thing as the one interpretation of this piece that we have to follow that there are many different ways to play the piano there are many different interpretations
of any given piece of music. And I'd like to think that my legacy. Big part of my legacy was showing people what to do when they practice, so that they've, they've actually got some tangible skills tools that they can use when they they sit and practice.
That's the biggest thing probably isn't it.
Yeah, yeah, definitely. Yes. Wonderful. You're a wonderful great teacher. And as I am speaking with you I'm learning a lot, and then maybe one of these days, we'll see each other in person and I know you lived in the United States, quite like number of years as I did, I did.
I would like to just give a big shout out to one of my teachers there who I didn't study with in an official institutional capacity but Julian Martin, who has been on the faculty of Julia for many years, Julian if you're watching and listening, just to say that you are one of the
most influential influences on my piano journey, hugely amazing musician pianist, who gave me a tremendous amount so you know, Nina Svetlanova, of course, and Shine who I was studying with for a short time there and Leon Fleischer whose influence has been immeasurable
and I'm sure on his influence every day almost and he's helped me, you know, rewind myself. I would say, and so yeah I was a New Yorker for seven years and Peabody for a year before that.
And had an amazing time in New York, but I'm now happily living in London, and very happy to be here. Wonderful. Yeah, one of these is I'll visit London and then I'll stop by your piano studio.
I'll come over for a curry. Yeah, sounds great. Yeah.
Great. So, before we go for our listeners, please, please visit practicingthepiano.com to learn more about Graham's incredible contributions to piano pedagogy. It's quite resourceful and as he mentioned, there's video there's course there's ebooks there's
blog everything there's to know about piano and piano technique and how to practice and so on. And also, as I mentioned, with your annual membership, there is a special discount code available for our listeners so please go scroll down to the description
section of this episode to find more. And also you are quite active on YouTube and Instagram and so on so Instagram handle is informants music and a YouTube at informants you, I mean, you guys need to check out his videos they're impeccable and then also details
about technique and interpretation. I really love watching those videos. So I also recommend for my audience to do the same. Is there anything else before we go to the rapid fire questions you'd like to say or just if somebody wants to come on one of my piano
courses. I do tutor regular courses at Finchcocks, which is a manor house in Kent in England, the most magnificent place 300 year old building. We do piano courses there I also tutor courses in Blonet, Switzerland, twice a year.
And that's for amateurs, the Blonet. And yes, that's what I'd like to add. Oh great now how so I can just list the links in the description then they can access.
Yes, I've sent them to you. Yes, yes, I have received. Wonderful. Thank you so much. Thank you so much.
So, this has been a fun and inspiring conversation Graham and but before I let you go we have one more thing to do which is the rapid fire questions the real rapid fire questions so let's start.
There are silly questions but I just want you to answer them as short brief as possible.
Alright so question number one.
What is your comfort food.
My comfort food, a chili. I have chili with everything I eat. Oh, sounds great.
How do you like your coffee in the morning.
I like it strong with a little bit of milk.
Cats or dogs.
Dogs for sure. Okay. Do you have, do you have one.
No, unfortunately my lifestyle won't permit.
Sunrise or sunset.
Sunrise summer or winter.
Summer.
Level two.
What skill have you always wanted to learn but haven't had a chance to.
Oh, jazz piano. Oh yeah that's great. That's a great one.
What is your word or words to live by.
My words to live by.
Be kind, be fun.
What is the most important quality you look for in other people.
Respect.
Now, next one is a little difficult.
Name three people who inspire you, living or dead.
Oh, okay so I have to go through my teachers don't I.
Leon Fleischer, Nina Svetlanova, Julian Martin.
There we go. Great. That was easy.
So level three, name one piece in your current playlist.
One piece in my current playlist. Oh there's so many.
Okay, well I'm looking at the Mussorgsky pictures at the moment.
Oh, great. Now, last one.
Fill in the blank. Music is blank.
Is everything.
Ah, beautiful.
I wasn't expecting any of those.
It was very, very good.
All right, thank you so much for answering all the questions.
So that wraps up this episode of the Piano Part.
A heartfelt thanks to you, Graham, for joining us today and sharing your incredible stories, insights and expertise with such joyful and authentic manner.
Thank you.
Yukimi, you've been wonderful. You've been such a great host and thank you so much for the opportunity to talk.
Thank you. So to our wonderful audience, you can learn more about Graham and his work by visiting his websites at practicingthepiano.com and follow him on Facebook at informants and Instagram at informants music and YouTube at informants.
And of course, thank you to our faithful listeners to tuning in today.
If you enjoyed today's episode, please give it a thumbs up and subscribe to the Piano Part on YouTube.
Don't forget to share and review this episode on your social media and tag the Piano Part.
It's one of the best ways to help us grow and we'd love to hear your feedback.
For the latest piano news and updates, be sure to follow the Piano Part on social media.
I will see you for the next episode of the Piano Part. Bye everyone.
Thank you, Graham.
Thank you so much.
Bye.