1<br>00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:07,560<br>Welcome to Artificially Intelligent Marketing, a weekly podcast where we stay on top of the<br><br>2<br>00:00:07,560 --> 00:00:13,300<br>latest trends, tips and tools in the world of marketing AI, helping you get the best<br><br>3<br>00:00:13,300 --> 00:00:16,120<br>results from your marketing efforts.<br><br>4<br>00:00:16,120 --> 00:00:24,640<br>Now let's join our hosts, Paul Avery and Martin Broadhurst.<br><br>5<br>00:00:24,640 --> 00:00:32,120<br>Welcome to Artificially Intelligent Marketing, a podcast for marketers who need to know about<br><br>6<br>00:00:32,120 --> 00:00:33,120<br>AI.<br><br>7<br>00:00:33,120 --> 00:00:36,600<br>I'm joined with my co-host here today, Martin Broadhurst.<br><br>8<br>00:00:36,600 --> 00:00:38,720<br>Hi Martin, how are you doing?<br><br>9<br>00:00:38,720 --> 00:00:40,160<br>I'm good, thank you.<br><br>10<br>00:00:40,160 --> 00:00:45,920<br>Recovering from the misery that was watching my football club, Derby County, get trashed<br><br>11<br>00:00:45,920 --> 00:00:49,200<br>by Barnsley 4-1 at the weekend.<br><br>12<br>00:00:49,200 --> 00:00:52,080<br>So the week has progressively got better, I must admit.<br><br>13<br>00:00:52,080 --> 00:00:55,280<br>There we go, we're going to have a podcast where we're going to talk a little bit about<br><br>14<br>00:00:55,280 --> 00:01:00,880<br>AI marketing and quite a lot about just how difficult and painful it is for Martin to<br><br>15<br>00:01:00,880 --> 00:01:02,720<br>be a Derby County fan.<br><br>16<br>00:01:02,720 --> 00:01:09,520<br>Myself, I was in San Diego this week, sunny San Diego, not as sunny as usual, pretty darn<br><br>17<br>00:01:09,520 --> 00:01:14,960<br>cold to be honest, at a drug discovery conference, which is actually rather awesome.<br><br>18<br>00:01:14,960 --> 00:01:19,240<br>I just stepped off a plane a couple of hours ago and walked into my house 15 minutes ago<br><br>19<br>00:01:19,240 --> 00:01:20,680<br>to do this podcast with Martin.<br><br>20<br>00:01:20,680 --> 00:01:26,280<br>So if I make even less sense than I normally do, Martin, that is going to be my excuse<br><br>21<br>00:01:26,280 --> 00:01:27,680<br>at least for this week.<br><br>22<br>00:01:27,680 --> 00:01:32,280<br>And then when we do next week's podcast, I'll obviously have to come up with a new one.<br><br>23<br>00:01:32,280 --> 00:01:36,840<br>Right, Martin, why don't we give people just a feel for who we are seeing as this is the<br><br>24<br>00:01:36,840 --> 00:01:42,880<br>first episode and then tell them what they can expect if they subscribe to this hopefully<br><br>25<br>00:01:42,880 --> 00:01:45,840<br>useful but somewhat full of nonsense podcast.<br><br>26<br>00:01:45,840 --> 00:01:50,920<br>Yeah, well, so I introduce myself first, Derby County fan, as you already know.<br><br>27<br>00:01:50,920 --> 00:01:52,720<br>But yeah, my name's Martin Broadhurst.<br><br>28<br>00:01:52,720 --> 00:02:00,520<br>I run a small consultancy advising companies on sales and marketing technology, so CRM<br><br>29<br>00:02:00,520 --> 00:02:01,520<br>marketing automation.<br><br>30<br>00:02:01,520 --> 00:02:06,040<br>And in recent years, I've been doing a lot more on the artificial intelligence front<br><br>31<br>00:02:06,040 --> 00:02:07,040<br>as well.<br><br>32<br>00:02:07,040 --> 00:02:12,780<br>Regularly speaking at conferences about marketing AI and recently published a paper in the Applied<br><br>33<br>00:02:12,780 --> 00:02:21,200<br>Marketing Analytics Journal about how businesses of any size can deploy AI in their marketing.<br><br>34<br>00:02:21,200 --> 00:02:27,280<br>So that's a kind of flavor actually, what you can expect, the theme of that paper is<br><br>35<br>00:02:27,280 --> 00:02:33,080<br>how can businesses deploy AI in their business from a marketing and sales perspective?<br><br>36<br>00:02:33,080 --> 00:02:37,000<br>That's very much what we're going to be talking about, looking at the latest technologies.<br><br>37<br>00:02:37,000 --> 00:02:42,640<br>You'll be hearing all the familiar names like ChattGPT, OpenAI and the big players, but<br><br>38<br>00:02:42,640 --> 00:02:48,840<br>also looking at the startups, some of the emerging technologies as well.<br><br>39<br>00:02:48,840 --> 00:02:49,840<br>Good stuff.<br><br>40<br>00:02:49,840 --> 00:02:52,680<br>Yeah, I'm really excited to get into some of that with you today, Martin.<br><br>41<br>00:02:52,680 --> 00:02:57,080<br>I know we've got some great stories this week to look at and a really interesting tool for<br><br>42<br>00:02:57,080 --> 00:02:58,640<br>tool of the week.<br><br>43<br>00:02:58,640 --> 00:03:00,280<br>Hi, everyone.<br><br>44<br>00:03:00,280 --> 00:03:01,400<br>My name is Paul Avery.<br><br>45<br>00:03:01,400 --> 00:03:06,280<br>I am CEO of a life science marketing agency called Biostrata.<br><br>46<br>00:03:06,280 --> 00:03:09,520<br>But the only real things you need to know about me in the context is this is I am a<br><br>47<br>00:03:09,520 --> 00:03:10,520<br>nerd.<br><br>48<br>00:03:10,520 --> 00:03:11,640<br>I am a science nerd.<br><br>49<br>00:03:11,640 --> 00:03:13,680<br>I am a computer nerd.<br><br>50<br>00:03:13,680 --> 00:03:15,760<br>I am an AI nerd.<br><br>51<br>00:03:15,760 --> 00:03:17,800<br>And I just love diving into all this stuff.<br><br>52<br>00:03:17,800 --> 00:03:19,400<br>I do it for fun.<br><br>53<br>00:03:19,400 --> 00:03:23,040<br>Martin and I are constantly chatting over WhatsApp and on the phone.<br><br>54<br>00:03:23,040 --> 00:03:26,560<br>And we thought, you know what, all this stuff we're reading about, all this stuff we're<br><br>55<br>00:03:26,560 --> 00:03:30,720<br>learning, I wonder if we can actually just help save some other people time and keep<br><br>56<br>00:03:30,720 --> 00:03:34,120<br>them up to date on what's happening in the world of marketing AI by doing all the heavy<br><br>57<br>00:03:34,120 --> 00:03:39,080<br>lifting for them of sifting through the stories to figuring out what is the most important<br><br>58<br>00:03:39,080 --> 00:03:43,520<br>thing for us all to be knowing and hearing about this week, but also playing with those<br><br>59<br>00:03:43,520 --> 00:03:47,960<br>different tools to get a feel for what they can do, what their strengths are, what the<br><br>60<br>00:03:47,960 --> 00:03:54,120<br>best applications are so that you as a listener can stay on top of what tools and tips and<br><br>61<br>00:03:54,120 --> 00:03:58,280<br>tricks are out there for you to get the best out of using AI for marketing, doing that<br><br>62<br>00:03:58,280 --> 00:04:00,280<br>work so that you don't have to.<br><br>63<br>00:04:00,280 --> 00:04:01,840<br>Cool, cool.<br><br>64<br>00:04:01,840 --> 00:04:06,840<br>Let's chuck ourselves straight into story number one then, Martin.<br><br>65<br>00:04:06,840 --> 00:04:13,600<br>Why don't you tell us about this fairly big deal with the release of ChatGPT and Whisper<br><br>66<br>00:04:13,600 --> 00:04:14,600<br>APIs?<br><br>67<br>00:04:14,600 --> 00:04:21,800<br>Yeah, so anyone listening to this podcast will likely know that ChatGPT was launched<br><br>68<br>00:04:21,800 --> 00:04:30,560<br>in November, caused a bit of a stir and it wasn't in and of itself new tech in the purest<br><br>69<br>00:04:30,560 --> 00:04:31,560<br>sense.<br><br>70<br>00:04:31,560 --> 00:04:36,280<br>It was built upon GPT-3 that had been around for a couple of years and lots of developers<br><br>71<br>00:04:36,280 --> 00:04:39,400<br>had been integrating into their tool stack.<br><br>72<br>00:04:39,400 --> 00:04:46,280<br>But because of the way that the interface was just like using iMessage or WhatsApp,<br><br>73<br>00:04:46,280 --> 00:04:49,840<br>it just boomed and was a massive success.<br><br>74<br>00:04:49,840 --> 00:04:55,480<br>They launched ChatGPT Pro, or plus I can never remember which one it is, a couple of weeks<br><br>75<br>00:04:55,480 --> 00:04:56,480<br>ago.<br><br>76<br>00:04:56,480 --> 00:05:02,560<br>But now developers can actually start using it in their apps, which is massive.<br><br>77<br>00:05:02,560 --> 00:05:10,880<br>Yeah, really big deal, they've announced that ChatGPT API is available, as is Whisper, which<br><br>78<br>00:05:10,880 --> 00:05:13,600<br>is a completely different model.<br><br>79<br>00:05:13,600 --> 00:05:17,720<br>And it's a transcription tool, really.<br><br>80<br>00:05:17,720 --> 00:05:21,680<br>So it will take audio and turn it into text and there's different things that you can<br><br>81<br>00:05:21,680 --> 00:05:23,280<br>do with that.<br><br>82<br>00:05:23,280 --> 00:05:30,640<br>But that's been quite a challenging AI to deploy.<br><br>83<br>00:05:30,640 --> 00:05:34,440<br>Lots of developers have said it was quite tricky.<br><br>84<br>00:05:34,440 --> 00:05:37,320<br>And now they've said, it's fine, we'll deal with it.<br><br>85<br>00:05:37,320 --> 00:05:41,080<br>We'll make it available via API.<br><br>86<br>00:05:41,080 --> 00:05:42,520<br>So basically crack on.<br><br>87<br>00:05:42,520 --> 00:05:44,880<br>So yeah, very exciting stuff.<br><br>88<br>00:05:44,880 --> 00:05:50,780<br>So this is pretty interesting because there's already been an explosion of GPT-driven tools<br><br>89<br>00:05:50,780 --> 00:05:51,780<br>for writing.<br><br>90<br>00:05:51,780 --> 00:05:58,440<br>I've got Writer, Jasper, and a huge host of all of those types of tools.<br><br>91<br>00:05:58,440 --> 00:06:03,480<br>We already have Otter and a bunch of other transcription tools, transcription being baked<br><br>92<br>00:06:03,480 --> 00:06:08,200<br>into many different even web conferencing software like Microsoft Teams.<br><br>93<br>00:06:08,200 --> 00:06:12,800<br>What I think was really interesting here is that reduction in cost.<br><br>94<br>00:06:12,800 --> 00:06:19,240<br>So any of these apps that use OpenAI's infrastructure through the API, they have to pay.<br><br>95<br>00:06:19,240 --> 00:06:21,080<br>It's fairly nominal.<br><br>96<br>00:06:21,080 --> 00:06:27,960<br>Cost per token as it's defined, which in essence is kind of like per word or per word generated<br><br>97<br>00:06:27,960 --> 00:06:30,160<br>or per word transcribed.<br><br>98<br>00:06:30,160 --> 00:06:32,840<br>But they've reduced the cost by 10 times.<br><br>99<br>00:06:32,840 --> 00:06:38,520<br>So that'll be interesting to see a further explosion of even more tools with the costs<br><br>100<br>00:06:38,520 --> 00:06:41,360<br>of actually leveraging OpenAI's platform dropping.<br><br>101<br>00:06:41,360 --> 00:06:46,960<br>I wonder if that will put a pressure on some of the business models of some of the early<br><br>102<br>00:06:46,960 --> 00:06:52,840<br>writing and transcription tools because presumably these new tools that we see emerge from here<br><br>103<br>00:06:52,840 --> 00:06:57,680<br>can do it even cheaper than was being done before.<br><br>104<br>00:06:57,680 --> 00:07:07,600<br>Yeah, I think switching over the API to the ChatGPT one is fairly straightforward.<br><br>105<br>00:07:07,600 --> 00:07:13,040<br>Most of the writing tools that I've been using made that switch immediately themselves.<br><br>106<br>00:07:13,040 --> 00:07:22,480<br>Certainly within hours, I was using the ChatGPT API via one of the platforms that I use, Haptip<br><br>107<br>00:07:22,480 --> 00:07:30,680<br>to Riku, R-I-K-U, great little tool if you're interested in playing around with AI models.<br><br>108<br>00:07:30,680 --> 00:07:31,920<br>They got it deployed very quickly.<br><br>109<br>00:07:31,920 --> 00:07:38,600<br>But yeah, that 10x reduction in cost is massive, an order of magnitude cost reduction.<br><br>110<br>00:07:38,600 --> 00:07:41,520<br>And that is not to be sniffed at.<br><br>111<br>00:07:41,520 --> 00:07:47,360<br>And quite exciting for, you know, if that's the direction that we're heading.<br><br>112<br>00:07:47,360 --> 00:07:51,760<br>What I do find interesting is how the alternative models are going to compete.<br><br>113<br>00:07:51,760 --> 00:07:56,400<br>So OpenAI is the big player in this space.<br><br>114<br>00:07:56,400 --> 00:08:03,280<br>The equivalent large language models to GPT-3, the predecessor to ChatGPT, there's lots of<br><br>115<br>00:08:03,280 --> 00:08:04,280<br>those available.<br><br>116<br>00:08:04,280 --> 00:08:08,200<br>So AI-21 has a model called Jurassic.<br><br>117<br>00:08:08,200 --> 00:08:10,840<br>Cohair has a large model as well.<br><br>118<br>00:08:10,840 --> 00:08:13,000<br>And then there's numerous others.<br><br>119<br>00:08:13,000 --> 00:08:17,940<br>Their cost per token usage was very similar.<br><br>120<br>00:08:17,940 --> 00:08:22,920<br>They were all in and around the same ballpark.<br><br>121<br>00:08:22,920 --> 00:08:29,120<br>And OpenAI have really thrown a hand grenade into the mix there.<br><br>122<br>00:08:29,120 --> 00:08:30,480<br>Yeah, absolutely.<br><br>123<br>00:08:30,480 --> 00:08:36,540<br>So fingers crossed, we'll see even more tools emerge at very attractive price points and<br><br>124<br>00:08:36,540 --> 00:08:41,920<br>potentially even more and more specialized and niche applications now that people can<br><br>125<br>00:08:41,920 --> 00:08:48,200<br>get hold of that API at a very low price and start creating apps for very specific use<br><br>126<br>00:08:48,200 --> 00:08:49,200<br>cases.<br><br>127<br>00:08:49,200 --> 00:08:52,160<br>Yeah, all being well.<br><br>128<br>00:08:52,160 --> 00:08:58,360<br>And I think the availability of Whisper as well is not to be overlooked.<br><br>129<br>00:08:58,360 --> 00:09:01,360<br>That is really going to transform app development.<br><br>130<br>00:09:01,360 --> 00:09:07,180<br>And I think when people start chaining together some of these tools, you know, Whisper working<br><br>131<br>00:09:07,180 --> 00:09:13,880<br>alongside ChatGPT, that's going to be a really interesting development as well.<br><br>132<br>00:09:13,880 --> 00:09:15,240<br>Marketers watch this space.<br><br>133<br>00:09:15,240 --> 00:09:16,240<br>Absolutely.<br><br>134<br>00:09:16,240 --> 00:09:22,960<br>You can imagine if you've got a content production workflow where you might need to interview<br><br>135<br>00:09:22,960 --> 00:09:28,120<br>a subject matter expert, you might ask ChatGPT to give you some inspiration for good interview<br><br>136<br>00:09:28,120 --> 00:09:32,760<br>questions on a particular topic, record the interview and have something like Whisper<br><br>137<br>00:09:32,760 --> 00:09:40,940<br>auto transcribe it and then have ChatGPT auto summarize or create a blog post off the basis<br><br>138<br>00:09:40,940 --> 00:09:42,400<br>of that transcription.<br><br>139<br>00:09:42,400 --> 00:09:50,240<br>So yes, very heavily influenced content production process by chaining those tools, as you said,<br><br>140<br>00:09:50,240 --> 00:09:51,240<br>Martin.<br><br>141<br>00:09:51,240 --> 00:09:55,320<br>From there, let's move a bit into talking about Cohere, one of these other large language<br><br>142<br>00:09:55,320 --> 00:10:01,920<br>models, because you spotted this week that they have released a beta of their new summarize<br><br>143<br>00:10:01,920 --> 00:10:04,040<br>tool and you've been having a play.<br><br>144<br>00:10:04,040 --> 00:10:07,640<br>So tell us a bit more about this tool and what your experiences have been with it this<br><br>145<br>00:10:07,640 --> 00:10:08,640<br>week.<br><br>146<br>00:10:08,640 --> 00:10:16,280<br>Yeah, so Cohere, an alternative provider of large language models and AI language technology,<br><br>147<br>00:10:16,280 --> 00:10:22,240<br>in fact, recently announced that they were going for a valuation of around $6 billion.<br><br>148<br>00:10:22,240 --> 00:10:27,280<br>So fundraising for that, you know, feel free to chip in Paul, if you've got a few coffers<br><br>149<br>00:10:27,280 --> 00:10:28,280<br>down the back of the sofa.<br><br>150<br>00:10:28,280 --> 00:10:32,960<br>I could buy 0.0000000000001% of that.<br><br>151<br>00:10:32,960 --> 00:10:40,220<br>Well, you know, I'm sure they'll be willing to listen.<br><br>152<br>00:10:40,220 --> 00:10:46,080<br>But they've just announced that one of their models, they've trained especially as a summarization<br><br>153<br>00:10:46,080 --> 00:10:47,080<br>engine.<br><br>154<br>00:10:47,080 --> 00:10:52,120<br>And this is quite interesting because ChatGPT, if you go into ChatGPT and just copy and paste<br><br>155<br>00:10:52,120 --> 00:10:56,360<br>an article from the web and stick it in, don't say anything, just literally throw in the<br><br>156<br>00:10:56,360 --> 00:11:01,440<br>article and press enter, it will give you a kind of summary of that article.<br><br>157<br>00:11:01,440 --> 00:11:05,440<br>Just it will say, well, this is what that's about.<br><br>158<br>00:11:05,440 --> 00:11:08,280<br>The thing is, it's limited on character count.<br><br>159<br>00:11:08,280 --> 00:11:12,640<br>So it's still limited on the number of tokens as we've just been talking about, and it's<br><br>160<br>00:11:12,640 --> 00:11:14,760<br>got quite a small limit.<br><br>161<br>00:11:14,760 --> 00:11:20,640<br>But Cohere announced that they were basically creating a summarization tool that could have<br><br>162<br>00:11:20,640 --> 00:11:25,960<br>up to 50,000 characters, which is an enormous amount of text.<br><br>163<br>00:11:25,960 --> 00:11:28,800<br>In fact, I have been playing around with it this week.<br><br>164<br>00:11:28,800 --> 00:11:35,900<br>And I took a journal article about, it was a study looking at, in fact, it doesn't matter<br><br>165<br>00:11:35,900 --> 00:11:43,200<br>what it was, but it was about marketing AI and the current state of marketing and artificial<br><br>166<br>00:11:43,200 --> 00:11:44,200<br>intelligence.<br><br>167<br>00:11:44,200 --> 00:11:52,200<br>15 page PDF, I copied all of the text out of that, threw it into this summarization<br><br>168<br>00:11:52,200 --> 00:11:53,200<br>tool.<br><br>169<br>00:11:53,200 --> 00:11:57,760<br>By the time I deleted all the references and all of that, it was coming in at about 40,000<br><br>170<br>00:11:57,760 --> 00:11:58,760<br>characters.<br><br>171<br>00:11:58,760 --> 00:12:03,120<br>It was a really long meaty bit of text.<br><br>172<br>00:12:03,120 --> 00:12:04,840<br>And I asked it to summarize it.<br><br>173<br>00:12:04,840 --> 00:12:07,680<br>And yeah, sure, it summarized it.<br><br>174<br>00:12:07,680 --> 00:12:11,280<br>I would describe the summary as being comically small.<br><br>175<br>00:12:11,280 --> 00:12:13,600<br>It was four sentences.<br><br>176<br>00:12:13,600 --> 00:12:17,200<br>I mean, it really, really boiled it down.<br><br>177<br>00:12:17,200 --> 00:12:19,480<br>It actually has a setting on it.<br><br>178<br>00:12:19,480 --> 00:12:23,960<br>It's this summarization tool where you can go small, medium and large.<br><br>179<br>00:12:23,960 --> 00:12:27,760<br>And I thought, that's quite useful if you've got a really long piece of text, you might<br><br>180<br>00:12:27,760 --> 00:12:34,520<br>want to summarize 40,000 characters down to, I don't know, like a thousand characters or<br><br>181<br>00:12:34,520 --> 00:12:35,520<br>something.<br><br>182<br>00:12:35,520 --> 00:12:36,520<br>But no, four sentences.<br><br>183<br>00:12:36,520 --> 00:12:42,760<br>Don't get me wrong, it was accurate, but I would have liked a little more.<br><br>184<br>00:12:42,760 --> 00:12:43,760<br>Yeah.<br><br>185<br>00:12:43,760 --> 00:12:45,240<br>But it was accurate, you feel?<br><br>186<br>00:12:45,240 --> 00:12:47,960<br>Yeah, it was accurate.<br><br>187<br>00:12:47,960 --> 00:12:50,600<br>It did a good job.<br><br>188<br>00:12:50,600 --> 00:12:57,760<br>So I can't knock it too much, but it did just feel like it had summarized hyper aggressively.<br><br>189<br>00:12:57,760 --> 00:13:02,280<br>Yeah, boiled it right down to the truest essence.<br><br>190<br>00:13:02,280 --> 00:13:07,480<br>And I just Googled 50,000 characters is somewhere between 7,000 and 12,000 words.<br><br>191<br>00:13:07,480 --> 00:13:10,800<br>So we're talking about pretty chunky pieces here.<br><br>192<br>00:13:10,800 --> 00:13:15,520<br>And it's interesting that your experience was that it was accurate because some of the<br><br>193<br>00:13:15,520 --> 00:13:21,200<br>summarized tools that I've been playing with and even some of the meeting summarized tools<br><br>194<br>00:13:21,200 --> 00:13:25,720<br>like Tactic that has now AI driven meeting summarization in.<br><br>195<br>00:13:25,720 --> 00:13:32,420<br>So far, if I'm honest, when I look at the summary, I feel like there are key elements<br><br>196<br>00:13:32,420 --> 00:13:38,080<br>of that call or that paper or whatever it is that I'm summarizing that these tools are<br><br>197<br>00:13:38,080 --> 00:13:39,080<br>missing.<br><br>198<br>00:13:39,080 --> 00:13:46,160<br>And I think when I reflect upon, even if I have a meeting with three or four people and<br><br>199<br>00:13:46,160 --> 00:13:50,000<br>I come out of that and say, what do you think was the most important thing?<br><br>200<br>00:13:50,000 --> 00:13:54,960<br>Usually like the key bits we probably all agree on, but people see different things.<br><br>201<br>00:13:54,960 --> 00:13:58,440<br>Even if you and I read a book, Martin, and I say, what was the most interesting thing<br><br>202<br>00:13:58,440 --> 00:13:59,440<br>for you?<br><br>203<br>00:13:59,440 --> 00:14:00,540<br>It's going to be different, right?<br><br>204<br>00:14:00,540 --> 00:14:04,120<br>Because the context that you bring to reading that book, the previous knowledge that you<br><br>205<br>00:14:04,120 --> 00:14:08,840<br>have, the other books you've read, all that other stuff is going to influence what you<br><br>206<br>00:14:08,840 --> 00:14:09,840<br>find interesting.<br><br>207<br>00:14:09,840 --> 00:14:15,440<br>So I think it's going to be really interesting space to see how this plays out, how these<br><br>208<br>00:14:15,440 --> 00:14:22,200<br>tools improve and also whether or not they just cause a bit of a homogenization in our<br><br>209<br>00:14:22,200 --> 00:14:27,240<br>interpretation of information that may or may not be a good thing, right?<br><br>210<br>00:14:27,240 --> 00:14:31,480<br>Sometimes it's good for you and I to take different things away from a piece of text,<br><br>211<br>00:14:31,480 --> 00:14:36,080<br>let's say, because that the interesting magic is probably somewhere in the middle.<br><br>212<br>00:14:36,080 --> 00:14:37,460<br>Like why did you find that interesting?<br><br>213<br>00:14:37,460 --> 00:14:38,800<br>Why did I find that interesting?<br><br>214<br>00:14:38,800 --> 00:14:40,920<br>What conversation can we have about that?<br><br>215<br>00:14:40,920 --> 00:14:43,680<br>We rely too heavily on some of these summarization tools.<br><br>216<br>00:14:43,680 --> 00:14:46,200<br>We might lose a bit of that, I worry.<br><br>217<br>00:14:46,200 --> 00:14:47,800<br>Yeah, hugely.<br><br>218<br>00:14:47,800 --> 00:14:51,880<br>And I actually find, so I've been using a summarization tool, which is no longer available<br><br>219<br>00:14:51,880 --> 00:14:52,880<br>actually.<br><br>220<br>00:14:52,880 --> 00:15:00,320<br>It was a great tool called Summary, or they've changed their pricing model anyway.<br><br>221<br>00:15:00,320 --> 00:15:04,520<br>Their tool was brilliant for, let's say I was on Harvard Business Review and there's<br><br>222<br>00:15:04,520 --> 00:15:06,360<br>a long form article.<br><br>223<br>00:15:06,360 --> 00:15:10,760<br>I could read the kind of cliff notes, just give me the summary.<br><br>224<br>00:15:10,760 --> 00:15:14,600<br>And then if I wanted to get the full piece, if I thought, oh, that's quite interesting.<br><br>225<br>00:15:14,600 --> 00:15:18,160<br>I want the detail and I would jump in and read the full thing.<br><br>226<br>00:15:18,160 --> 00:15:21,880<br>So I do think there's a place for summarization, but you're absolutely right.<br><br>227<br>00:15:21,880 --> 00:15:30,960<br>We have to be careful about how we approach and not shortcut our way to going, well, I've<br><br>228<br>00:15:30,960 --> 00:15:39,120<br>read the four sentence summary of that 8,000 word document and I think I know it all now.<br><br>229<br>00:15:39,120 --> 00:15:40,120<br>Absolutely agree.<br><br>230<br>00:15:40,120 --> 00:15:41,120<br>Absolutely agree.<br><br>231<br>00:15:41,120 --> 00:15:42,120<br>Right.<br><br>232<br>00:15:42,120 --> 00:15:46,960<br>Let's move on to our next story, which is about Hugging Face and AWS partnering to bring<br><br>233<br>00:15:46,960 --> 00:15:49,000<br>open source models to developers.<br><br>234<br>00:15:49,000 --> 00:15:53,280<br>Again, this is another one you picked up, Martin, while I was out signing myself in<br><br>235<br>00:15:53,280 --> 00:15:54,280<br>San Diego.<br><br>236<br>00:15:54,280 --> 00:15:56,160<br>What's the story here?<br><br>237<br>00:15:56,160 --> 00:15:59,080<br>What do marketers need to know?<br><br>238<br>00:15:59,080 --> 00:16:07,160<br>So this is, for those of you that don't know who Hugging Face are, so Hugging Face is a<br><br>239<br>00:16:07,160 --> 00:16:13,280<br>community of artificial intelligence and machine learning researchers and enthusiasts.<br><br>240<br>00:16:13,280 --> 00:16:22,240<br>And it's kind of the, if you're a developer, the GitHub for AI ML projects.<br><br>241<br>00:16:22,240 --> 00:16:27,440<br>And it's where models will be posted and shared and you can have a bit of a play with them<br><br>242<br>00:16:27,440 --> 00:16:31,560<br>and there'll be summary cards explaining what they do.<br><br>243<br>00:16:31,560 --> 00:16:36,280<br>And it covers all areas of artificial intelligence and machine learning.<br><br>244<br>00:16:36,280 --> 00:16:42,240<br>This announcement is a partnership between Amazon Web Services, the cloud services from<br><br>245<br>00:16:42,240 --> 00:16:48,440<br>Amazon and Hugging Face to say that they're going to make some of these models available<br><br>246<br>00:16:48,440 --> 00:16:50,580<br>through AWS.<br><br>247<br>00:16:50,580 --> 00:17:00,880<br>So in the way that Microsoft's cloud services, Azure has open AI access now, so you can plug<br><br>248<br>00:17:00,880 --> 00:17:06,600<br>into the open AI tools, AWS is bringing in some of these alternative models.<br><br>249<br>00:17:06,600 --> 00:17:11,720<br>And actually AWS, I think, already has a large language model through AI 21.<br><br>250<br>00:17:11,720 --> 00:17:16,880<br>I believe that they are hosted or they're accessible via API on there as well.<br><br>251<br>00:17:16,880 --> 00:17:22,240<br>So if you're an app developer or a web developer or you're planning a new digital project or<br><br>252<br>00:17:22,240 --> 00:17:26,920<br>product, should I say, you can plug into these new models.<br><br>253<br>00:17:26,920 --> 00:17:32,080<br>And Hugging Face have said that their open source models, I don't think they've announced<br><br>254<br>00:17:32,080 --> 00:17:38,520<br>the extent to which they're going to be putting them on there, like how many and how frequently<br><br>255<br>00:17:38,520 --> 00:17:43,280<br>or what have you, but open source models will be made available on AWS.<br><br>256<br>00:17:43,280 --> 00:17:47,880<br>Although it should be said that they've also said it's not an exclusivity.<br><br>257<br>00:17:47,880 --> 00:17:51,640<br>They don't want to tie themselves in with one partner.<br><br>258<br>00:17:51,640 --> 00:17:54,920<br>Good stuff.<br><br>259<br>00:17:54,920 --> 00:17:56,920<br>What does this mean for marketers specifically?<br><br>260<br>00:17:56,920 --> 00:18:04,440<br>Well, it certainly means they're going to be less vulnerable to single source dependency.<br><br>261<br>00:18:04,440 --> 00:18:10,840<br>When we saw open AI go down last week and all of a sudden chat GPT and GPT-3 went down,<br><br>262<br>00:18:10,840 --> 00:18:12,040<br>the whole world panicked.<br><br>263<br>00:18:12,040 --> 00:18:16,080<br>I think this makes us less reliant on a single point.<br><br>264<br>00:18:16,080 --> 00:18:18,840<br>There'll be more competition in the market.<br><br>265<br>00:18:18,840 --> 00:18:20,720<br>But actually it just means that we've got more tools.<br><br>266<br>00:18:20,720 --> 00:18:28,620<br>If you're doing some sort of app development for your product, you can bring in new technologies.<br><br>267<br>00:18:28,620 --> 00:18:34,600<br>You can extend your product with these bits of tech more easily.<br><br>268<br>00:18:34,600 --> 00:18:39,760<br>You're not going to have to self-host and self-configure these AI ML models.<br><br>269<br>00:18:39,760 --> 00:18:44,600<br>They'll just be available on the cloud platforms that are already the most popular.<br><br>270<br>00:18:44,600 --> 00:18:45,600<br>Cool.<br><br>271<br>00:18:45,600 --> 00:18:46,600<br>Cool.<br><br>272<br>00:18:46,600 --> 00:18:50,400<br>There was another story you spotted with Hugging Face this week as well, collaborating with<br><br>273<br>00:18:50,400 --> 00:18:55,520<br>Stability AI and Canva around a new AI research nonprofit.<br><br>274<br>00:18:55,520 --> 00:18:59,240<br>What's happening there that marketers need to know about?<br><br>275<br>00:18:59,240 --> 00:19:06,080<br>Stability AI, Hugging Face and Canva are creating a not-for-profit AI research lab.<br><br>276<br>00:19:06,080 --> 00:19:10,400<br>Canva you'll be familiar with from the design world.<br><br>277<br>00:19:10,400 --> 00:19:17,040<br>Stability AI, they create the stable diffusion text-to-image generation model.<br><br>278<br>00:19:17,040 --> 00:19:25,480<br>They've created this new foundation, which is going to be looking at ethics in AI, really.<br><br>279<br>00:19:25,480 --> 00:19:31,560<br>That's what they're focusing on, ethics and alignment of AI.<br><br>280<br>00:19:31,560 --> 00:19:38,320<br>How we humans align with AI with the intent, there's a whole thing around alignment.<br><br>281<br>00:19:38,320 --> 00:19:43,960<br>It's somewhat controversial though because it's got publics, sorry, private sector investment<br><br>282<br>00:19:43,960 --> 00:19:45,920<br>and private sector backers.<br><br>283<br>00:19:45,920 --> 00:19:52,400<br>There are people saying that, yes, this is a great foundation, a great cause, but is<br><br>284<br>00:19:52,400 --> 00:19:56,920<br>it going to be truly impartial?<br><br>285<br>00:19:56,920 --> 00:19:57,920<br>We'll wait and see.<br><br>286<br>00:19:57,920 --> 00:20:03,440<br>What marketers need to be aware of though is that with any AI models, we have to be<br><br>287<br>00:20:03,440 --> 00:20:07,320<br>aware of weights and biases in the models.<br><br>288<br>00:20:07,320 --> 00:20:16,040<br>We don't want AI just putting out bad information or being unethical or bringing all of those<br><br>289<br>00:20:16,040 --> 00:20:19,800<br>terrible examples that we've seen in the past where it's misogynistic, racist, take your<br><br>290<br>00:20:19,800 --> 00:20:20,800<br>pick.<br><br>291<br>00:20:20,800 --> 00:20:24,360<br>They're doing a lot of work around this space.<br><br>292<br>00:20:24,360 --> 00:20:29,640<br>They might be one of the organizations leading the way in terms of the ethical frameworks<br><br>293<br>00:20:29,640 --> 00:20:38,600<br>and advising marketers and businesses more broadly how best to deploy AI in a ethical<br><br>294<br>00:20:38,600 --> 00:20:39,600<br>and compliant way.<br><br>295<br>00:20:39,600 --> 00:20:41,600<br>Yeah, I think that's really interesting.<br><br>296<br>00:20:41,600 --> 00:20:47,080<br>I've been listening a fair bit this week to Paul Reutzer over at the Marketing AI Institute<br><br>297<br>00:20:47,080 --> 00:20:52,680<br>talking about the ethics and guidelines of how we might use AI.<br><br>298<br>00:20:52,680 --> 00:20:57,960<br>I think one of the key things they've been chatting about that really resonated with<br><br>299<br>00:20:57,960 --> 00:21:02,440<br>me is that it does look a little bit like government are going to move too slowly on<br><br>300<br>00:21:02,440 --> 00:21:08,000<br>this to really be able to put anything in place to really apply regulations to how we<br><br>301<br>00:21:08,000 --> 00:21:12,080<br>use AI and certainly in marketing and communications.<br><br>302<br>00:21:12,080 --> 00:21:18,880<br>And that probably companies are going to have to take the lead in being clear about what<br><br>303<br>00:21:18,880 --> 00:21:23,400<br>they use AI for, especially in their marketing and communications, what was produced using<br><br>304<br>00:21:23,400 --> 00:21:26,520<br>say chat GPT, for example.<br><br>305<br>00:21:26,520 --> 00:21:32,240<br>So seeing that there's lots of people who are thinking about this, almost taking on<br><br>306<br>00:21:32,240 --> 00:21:36,520<br>the role potentially of regulators and government would traditionally have because I guess the<br><br>307<br>00:21:36,520 --> 00:21:40,880<br>assumption is they're going to move too slow because these technologies are just racing<br><br>308<br>00:21:40,880 --> 00:21:42,880<br>out the gate and developing so quickly.<br><br>309<br>00:21:42,880 --> 00:21:45,120<br>Yeah, I think that's a fair shout.<br><br>310<br>00:21:45,120 --> 00:21:50,000<br>I think the EU in the defense are putting together some AI legislation.<br><br>311<br>00:21:50,000 --> 00:21:55,240<br>I think the White House in the US has also got policy wonks looking at AI.<br><br>312<br>00:21:55,240 --> 00:21:59,440<br>But yes, the pace, when you just look at the pace of change in the industry, how quick<br><br>313<br>00:21:59,440 --> 00:22:03,840<br>products are coming out, I don't know how legislators could hope to catch up.<br><br>314<br>00:22:03,840 --> 00:22:10,960<br>But you mentioned the AI Marketing or the Marketing AI Institute, they've got the Creative<br><br>315<br>00:22:10,960 --> 00:22:16,920<br>Commons licensed manifesto that anyone can go and use for their own organization to put<br><br>316<br>00:22:16,920 --> 00:22:23,360<br>in place some kind of structure around how they plan to use AI and make that publicly<br><br>317<br>00:22:23,360 --> 00:22:24,360<br>available.<br><br>318<br>00:22:24,360 --> 00:22:26,600<br>So that's a resource that's well worth going and checking out.<br><br>319<br>00:22:26,600 --> 00:22:32,000<br>Yeah, I can imagine a time where we have our privacy statements on all of our websites<br><br>320<br>00:22:32,000 --> 00:22:37,200<br>saying how we use cookies and how we use customer and visitor data and all that stuff.<br><br>321<br>00:22:37,200 --> 00:22:42,400<br>We're going to be needing to add our policies on AI to those documents, or perhaps having<br><br>322<br>00:22:42,400 --> 00:22:48,480<br>completely separate web pages or documents on our sites explaining how we're using AI<br><br>323<br>00:22:48,480 --> 00:22:53,200<br>tools in our marketing and communications with prospects and customers and visitors.<br><br>324<br>00:22:53,200 --> 00:22:57,360<br>Yeah, certainly, I would welcome that kind of transparency.<br><br>325<br>00:22:57,360 --> 00:23:00,920<br>Yeah, I think it will become key.<br><br>326<br>00:23:00,920 --> 00:23:02,320<br>We can talk about this a bit more in a moment.<br><br>327<br>00:23:02,320 --> 00:23:06,360<br>It's probably a bit of a segue from some of the news we've been seeing to some of the<br><br>328<br>00:23:06,360 --> 00:23:14,200<br>things that have been on our minds as it relates to AI and marketing is what happens when we<br><br>329<br>00:23:14,200 --> 00:23:21,840<br>see a huge amount of content hit the market generated by ChatGPT and other tools.<br><br>330<br>00:23:21,840 --> 00:23:27,160<br>We get an even bigger content deluge than we've had over the last 10 years with the<br><br>331<br>00:23:27,160 --> 00:23:30,940<br>emergence and maturation of content marketing and inbound marketing.<br><br>332<br>00:23:30,940 --> 00:23:36,920<br>Content now just became even faster and cheaper and easier to just pump out content, whether<br><br>333<br>00:23:36,920 --> 00:23:39,080<br>it's actually useful to anyone or not.<br><br>334<br>00:23:39,080 --> 00:23:44,840<br>But if it's easy to do, we'll see lots of people doing it.<br><br>335<br>00:23:44,840 --> 00:23:51,720<br>Actually I think we'll see that emergence of people needing to sift through all that<br><br>336<br>00:23:51,720 --> 00:23:58,560<br>crap, trying to figure out what's actually worth listening to and guaranteed human content<br><br>337<br>00:23:58,560 --> 00:24:02,000<br>becoming a bit of a premium and a bit of a marker for trust that you're going to get<br><br>338<br>00:24:02,000 --> 00:24:05,760<br>some interesting novel ideas.<br><br>339<br>00:24:05,760 --> 00:24:09,600<br>So that as a marketer thinking about, well, how can I get ahead of that?<br><br>340<br>00:24:09,600 --> 00:24:11,600<br>And what types of content can you produce?<br><br>341<br>00:24:11,600 --> 00:24:15,280<br>Stuff like the podcast that we're doing now, right?<br><br>342<br>00:24:15,280 --> 00:24:19,000<br>I would love to see the robotic version of Martin.<br><br>343<br>00:24:19,000 --> 00:24:22,480<br>I suspect he's nowhere near as interesting as funny as you are.<br><br>344<br>00:24:22,480 --> 00:24:26,600<br>But we're certainly not there yet in terms of being, this isn't a deep fake, although<br><br>345<br>00:24:26,600 --> 00:24:29,240<br>that would be interesting as well.<br><br>346<br>00:24:29,240 --> 00:24:34,240<br>So things like podcasts and other ways to just bring that authenticity to content as<br><br>347<br>00:24:34,240 --> 00:24:41,440<br>we see an explosion of this stuff only helped by having a little line of text at the bottom<br><br>348<br>00:24:41,440 --> 00:24:46,040<br>of a blog post that says, we use Jack GPT to help put together this blog post, but all<br><br>349<br>00:24:46,040 --> 00:24:47,040<br>the ideas are ours.<br><br>350<br>00:24:47,040 --> 00:24:48,040<br>Right?<br><br>351<br>00:24:48,040 --> 00:24:50,840<br>That would be really, really helpful for people trying to figure out what to listen to.<br><br>352<br>00:24:50,840 --> 00:24:53,080<br>What are your thoughts on all of this, Mian?<br><br>353<br>00:24:53,080 --> 00:24:59,360<br>Yeah, I echo that sentiment is just a deluge of content and it's so easy to create articles<br><br>354<br>00:24:59,360 --> 00:25:00,360<br>now.<br><br>355<br>00:25:00,360 --> 00:25:06,840<br>The first time you show someone the simple prompt of write an article about such and<br><br>356<br>00:25:06,840 --> 00:25:13,080<br>such, their eyes light up, particularly small business owners that I've shown this to in<br><br>357<br>00:25:13,080 --> 00:25:14,600<br>recent weeks and months.<br><br>358<br>00:25:14,600 --> 00:25:19,240<br>And they get very excited and you do have to go, yeah, just because you can doesn't<br><br>359<br>00:25:19,240 --> 00:25:20,840<br>mean that you should.<br><br>360<br>00:25:20,840 --> 00:25:23,880<br>This is an important thing to remember.<br><br>361<br>00:25:23,880 --> 00:25:31,360<br>So yeah, human in the loop and actually human being the majority of the loop actually, I<br><br>362<br>00:25:31,360 --> 00:25:33,600<br>think is going to be the big part.<br><br>363<br>00:25:33,600 --> 00:25:34,920<br>These are assistants at the moment.<br><br>364<br>00:25:34,920 --> 00:25:44,800<br>I saw a nice headline this morning actually saying, we should think about less of AI being<br><br>365<br>00:25:44,800 --> 00:25:49,800<br>another person in the sense of like replacing an employee for instance, but think of it<br><br>366<br>00:25:49,800 --> 00:25:52,280<br>more as being your own second brain.<br><br>367<br>00:25:52,280 --> 00:25:55,320<br>And I do quite like that.<br><br>368<br>00:25:55,320 --> 00:25:57,320<br>It's an alternate way of thinking.<br><br>369<br>00:25:57,320 --> 00:26:01,280<br>It helps me write content better.<br><br>370<br>00:26:01,280 --> 00:26:07,520<br>It helps me produce articles quicker or gives me a different angle when brainstorming.<br><br>371<br>00:26:07,520 --> 00:26:16,080<br>But also it can do tasks like, I don't know, audio editing, using something like Descript<br><br>372<br>00:26:16,080 --> 00:26:20,520<br>that I otherwise don't have the skills to do, so it kind of adds these skills in.<br><br>373<br>00:26:20,520 --> 00:26:29,400<br>So yeah, I think that's an interesting thing for us to consider is how transparent we want<br><br>374<br>00:26:29,400 --> 00:26:31,400<br>to be with that.<br><br>375<br>00:26:31,400 --> 00:26:39,240<br>How do we be responsible marketers using AI and how, what's the word I'm looking for,<br><br>376<br>00:26:39,240 --> 00:26:40,240<br>front and center.<br><br>377<br>00:26:40,240 --> 00:26:46,280<br>I do like the idea of the disclaimers though on articles and whatnot.<br><br>378<br>00:26:46,280 --> 00:26:47,360<br>Yeah.<br><br>379<br>00:26:47,360 --> 00:26:53,300<br>I think enabling augmentation is definitely how I'm viewing the AI tools, certainly within<br><br>380<br>00:26:53,300 --> 00:26:56,040<br>our agency and within my own work.<br><br>381<br>00:26:56,040 --> 00:27:00,080<br>And I think to your point, what we kind of all need is an uncle Ben on our shoulder,<br><br>382<br>00:27:00,080 --> 00:27:01,080<br>right?<br><br>383<br>00:27:01,080 --> 00:27:02,880<br>With great power comes great responsibility.<br><br>384<br>00:27:02,880 --> 00:27:07,280<br>Marketers are very well known for taking cool new emerging tech and then massively overusing<br><br>385<br>00:27:07,280 --> 00:27:09,360<br>it and ruining it for everybody else.<br><br>386<br>00:27:09,360 --> 00:27:13,560<br>So come on marketers, let's do our best to try and control ourselves this time and not<br><br>387<br>00:27:13,560 --> 00:27:15,080<br>let that happen.<br><br>388<br>00:27:15,080 --> 00:27:16,160<br>Right.<br><br>389<br>00:27:16,160 --> 00:27:20,800<br>Let's talk about prompt engineering, Martin, because I've been thinking about this a lot.<br><br>390<br>00:27:20,800 --> 00:27:23,400<br>I know we've been talking a fair bit about prompt engineering.<br><br>391<br>00:27:23,400 --> 00:27:28,440<br>So for those that are not familiar, when you're using a number of AI tools, whether it's Dually2<br><br>392<br>00:27:28,440 --> 00:27:33,640<br>for image generation, ChatGPT to help you come up with interview questions or blog posts,<br><br>393<br>00:27:33,640 --> 00:27:37,360<br>in essence, you have to prompt the system to give you the thing that you want.<br><br>394<br>00:27:37,360 --> 00:27:40,320<br>And you do that by writing in the text box what you want.<br><br>395<br>00:27:40,320 --> 00:27:47,880<br>So you might say, create a blog post for me about the five exciting applications of confocal<br><br>396<br>00:27:47,880 --> 00:27:50,280<br>microscopy and then it will do its best to write it.<br><br>397<br>00:27:50,280 --> 00:27:54,200<br>And you can say things like write it for a PhD level audience or other different things<br><br>398<br>00:27:54,200 --> 00:27:59,720<br>that you can add to your prompt to further shape what you want the tool to give you and<br><br>399<br>00:27:59,720 --> 00:28:03,200<br>the types of quality output that you'll get.<br><br>400<br>00:28:03,200 --> 00:28:08,120<br>And we've been talking a bit about this as it relates to why marketers are actually perfectly<br><br>401<br>00:28:08,120 --> 00:28:15,020<br>positioned to get the most out of these tools, because creating a great prompt is like creating<br><br>402<br>00:28:15,020 --> 00:28:16,560<br>a great marketing brief.<br><br>403<br>00:28:16,560 --> 00:28:19,560<br>It's about thinking about who you're trying to reach.<br><br>404<br>00:28:19,560 --> 00:28:21,600<br>What's the key messages that you want to convey?<br><br>405<br>00:28:21,600 --> 00:28:24,080<br>What sort of style do you want to write in?<br><br>406<br>00:28:24,080 --> 00:28:30,560<br>What sort of key items and data points do you want to focus on?<br><br>407<br>00:28:30,560 --> 00:28:34,160<br>So what are your thoughts, Martin, marketers as prompt experts?<br><br>408<br>00:28:34,160 --> 00:28:38,320<br>Should we be halfway along already really in terms of being good briefers?<br><br>409<br>00:28:38,320 --> 00:28:39,320<br>Absolutely.<br><br>410<br>00:28:39,320 --> 00:28:43,680<br>A good brief is going to have all of those elements you've just spoken about.<br><br>411<br>00:28:43,680 --> 00:28:45,680<br>It's going to say, what do you want to achieve?<br><br>412<br>00:28:45,680 --> 00:28:51,240<br>In fact, actually, just thinking about the prompting, it's interesting using chat GPT<br><br>413<br>00:28:51,240 --> 00:28:57,760<br>versus GPT-3 in the way that you would prompt them.<br><br>414<br>00:28:57,760 --> 00:29:05,000<br>I've found that with chat GPT, you're telling the chat that they are a role.<br><br>415<br>00:29:05,000 --> 00:29:06,000<br>You're giving them a role.<br><br>416<br>00:29:06,000 --> 00:29:11,280<br>You are a such and such, and then it will play that role in your chat.<br><br>417<br>00:29:11,280 --> 00:29:17,160<br>Whereas with GPT-3, you can write your prompts from a first-person perspective.<br><br>418<br>00:29:17,160 --> 00:29:21,440<br>Some of the best prompts that I've personally written have had all of those elements that<br><br>419<br>00:29:21,440 --> 00:29:22,800<br>you've spoken about there.<br><br>420<br>00:29:22,800 --> 00:29:30,960<br>So I've maybe started my prompt saying, I am an award-winning technology journalist<br><br>421<br>00:29:30,960 --> 00:29:34,620<br>writing for techradar.com.<br><br>422<br>00:29:34,620 --> 00:29:39,960<br>My editor came to me and asked that I write an article about this, this, this, and this.<br><br>423<br>00:29:39,960 --> 00:29:43,880<br>All of that is the detail that you've just spoken about there.<br><br>424<br>00:29:43,880 --> 00:29:49,880<br>So it's about the product, the key messages that I've got to hit, the audience that it's<br><br>425<br>00:29:49,880 --> 00:29:56,080<br>been written for, the level of detail that might be the strengths and weaknesses of a<br><br>426<br>00:29:56,080 --> 00:30:00,800<br>particular strategy or approach or what have you.<br><br>427<br>00:30:00,800 --> 00:30:05,480<br>And then I will end my prompt with, this was my final written draft.<br><br>428<br>00:30:05,480 --> 00:30:09,280<br>And then it will write the article for me.<br><br>429<br>00:30:09,280 --> 00:30:10,280<br>Right.<br><br>430<br>00:30:10,280 --> 00:30:11,280<br>Yeah.<br><br>431<br>00:30:11,280 --> 00:30:14,080<br>I mean, such is the explosion of this.<br><br>432<br>00:30:14,080 --> 00:30:17,600<br>I don't know if you've seen this, Mark, but now there are marketplaces for prompts.<br><br>433<br>00:30:17,600 --> 00:30:22,960<br>Have you seen these like prompt base where you can buy and sell prompts in order to get<br><br>434<br>00:30:22,960 --> 00:30:24,520<br>the very most out of these tools?<br><br>435<br>00:30:24,520 --> 00:30:26,920<br>Have you had to play with any of those?<br><br>436<br>00:30:26,920 --> 00:30:27,920<br>I've not.<br><br>437<br>00:30:27,920 --> 00:30:35,680<br>I saw them burst onto the scene, particularly after the text to image platforms came out.<br><br>438<br>00:30:35,680 --> 00:30:37,800<br>That was where there was a big boom.<br><br>439<br>00:30:37,800 --> 00:30:42,760<br>And then I think, you know, the resurgence, well, I say resurgence, the emergence of,<br><br>440<br>00:30:42,760 --> 00:30:45,520<br>of chat GPT just took it to a whole new level.<br><br>441<br>00:30:45,520 --> 00:30:47,400<br>Yeah, it's fine.<br><br>442<br>00:30:47,400 --> 00:30:54,440<br>I'm so I'm on the prompt base now and there's a business model generator for $4.99 and SEO<br><br>443<br>00:30:54,440 --> 00:30:57,440<br>blog article generated for $2.99.<br><br>444<br>00:30:57,440 --> 00:31:05,120<br>The ingenuity of people to jump on these trends and figure out ways, you know, to make a buck<br><br>445<br>00:31:05,120 --> 00:31:09,200<br>off of the back of things that they've spent, you know, time getting good at, because certainly<br><br>446<br>00:31:09,200 --> 00:31:14,040<br>writing good prompts is not, it's you have to practice, you have to learn how to get<br><br>447<br>00:31:14,040 --> 00:31:15,240<br>the most out of the tools.<br><br>448<br>00:31:15,240 --> 00:31:17,240<br>So absolutely fascinating to see that.<br><br>449<br>00:31:17,240 --> 00:31:20,880<br>There is a dark side to this mine and I am going to have a rant.<br><br>450<br>00:31:20,880 --> 00:31:26,160<br>I see you smile because you know already how mad I am about this, which is my LinkedIn<br><br>451<br>00:31:26,160 --> 00:31:30,200<br>feed and I've probably done this to myself by clicking on too many of them and telling<br><br>452<br>00:31:30,200 --> 00:31:37,760<br>the algorithm I love them is so full of sliding carousels of the different types of prompts<br><br>453<br>00:31:37,760 --> 00:31:44,000<br>that you can give chat GPT that I've now seen eight or nine variations of the same prompt<br><br>454<br>00:31:44,000 --> 00:31:48,840<br>where people jump on this bandwagon to try and get lots of likes and shares by coming<br><br>455<br>00:31:48,840 --> 00:31:49,840<br>up with these carousels.<br><br>456<br>00:31:49,840 --> 00:31:53,880<br>So that annoys me a bit because it's like if it's done, it's done, right?<br><br>457<br>00:31:53,880 --> 00:31:55,520<br>Come up with something new.<br><br>458<br>00:31:55,520 --> 00:31:59,680<br>The second thing that triggers a bit of a rant from me is now I'm starting to see some<br><br>459<br>00:31:59,680 --> 00:32:04,440<br>of these prompts really move into areas that I think are dangerous.<br><br>460<br>00:32:04,440 --> 00:32:08,340<br>If people are going to use these prompts without really knowing how the underlying technology<br><br>461<br>00:32:08,340 --> 00:32:12,680<br>works and what you can rely on something like chat GPT for, they're actually going to get<br><br>462<br>00:32:12,680 --> 00:32:14,880<br>themselves in a bit of a sticky situation.<br><br>463<br>00:32:14,880 --> 00:32:20,280<br>The first one that comes to mind that's been bugging me this week is asking chat GPT to<br><br>464<br>00:32:20,280 --> 00:32:23,240<br>create bio personas for you.<br><br>465<br>00:32:23,240 --> 00:32:25,240<br>Chat GPT doesn't know who your customers are.<br><br>466<br>00:32:25,240 --> 00:32:27,160<br>He's never spoken to any of your customers.<br><br>467<br>00:32:27,160 --> 00:32:33,560<br>It is a prediction engine that's in effect read lots and lots of materials like books<br><br>468<br>00:32:33,560 --> 00:32:36,080<br>and web pages, et cetera.<br><br>469<br>00:32:36,080 --> 00:32:39,440<br>Its knowledge only even goes up to early 2021.<br><br>470<br>00:32:39,440 --> 00:32:40,720<br>It doesn't know your customers, right?<br><br>471<br>00:32:40,720 --> 00:32:45,640<br>It can come up with some sensible sounding things, but if you're going to base your entire<br><br>472<br>00:32:45,640 --> 00:32:51,360<br>messaging strategy on a prediction engine rather than actually speaking to your customers,<br><br>473<br>00:32:51,360 --> 00:32:52,360<br>you've got a problem, right?<br><br>474<br>00:32:52,360 --> 00:32:56,840<br>And I think this nicely highlights how we've talked about it a bit earlier.<br><br>475<br>00:32:56,840 --> 00:33:01,600<br>Great power comes great responsibility and really just understanding what these tools<br><br>476<br>00:33:01,600 --> 00:33:03,140<br>are good at and what they're not.<br><br>477<br>00:33:03,140 --> 00:33:09,000<br>What you can do is ask chat GPT to give you some questions to go ask your customers to<br><br>478<br>00:33:09,000 --> 00:33:10,840<br>help gather the intel you need.<br><br>479<br>00:33:10,840 --> 00:33:15,480<br>It's great for that type of brainstorming and idea generation for how you might go about<br><br>480<br>00:33:15,480 --> 00:33:18,560<br>doing something.<br><br>481<br>00:33:18,560 --> 00:33:23,360<br>Another area where I've seen this is an SEO where people are using it to help them do<br><br>482<br>00:33:23,360 --> 00:33:25,480<br>keyword analysis.<br><br>483<br>00:33:25,480 --> 00:33:27,360<br>It doesn't know the search volumes.<br><br>484<br>00:33:27,360 --> 00:33:32,600<br>All of its data that it's trained on is really quite old now in some cases.<br><br>485<br>00:33:32,600 --> 00:33:38,800<br>It can give you ideas for possible keywords that you can go feed into a proper tool like<br><br>486<br>00:33:38,800 --> 00:33:42,560<br>a SEM rush or Spifer or something like that.<br><br>487<br>00:33:42,560 --> 00:33:49,000<br>But it's not going to be the be all and end all in terms of helping you do your keyword<br><br>488<br>00:33:49,000 --> 00:33:52,280<br>research or any of these other things.<br><br>489<br>00:33:52,280 --> 00:33:54,600<br>I wanted to get that out there because it's been on my mind.<br><br>490<br>00:33:54,600 --> 00:33:58,920<br>I wanted to warn people to use these tools carefully, use them for things they can actually<br><br>491<br>00:33:58,920 --> 00:33:59,920<br>help with.<br><br>492<br>00:33:59,920 --> 00:34:04,280<br>Have you seen anything in this area, Martin, that made you worry or made you particularly<br><br>493<br>00:34:04,280 --> 00:34:06,040<br>excited around prompts?<br><br>494<br>00:34:06,040 --> 00:34:11,920<br>Well, I have a Twitter feed which is very similar to the LinkedIn carousel feed with<br><br>495<br>00:34:11,920 --> 00:34:19,840<br>just numerous tweets going, download my ebook full of prompts, get this Google Sheet with<br><br>496<br>00:34:19,840 --> 00:34:26,520<br>in fact, I saw one shared today, 700 chat GPT prompts, access it for free here.<br><br>497<br>00:34:26,520 --> 00:34:32,280<br>Yeah, I'll be honest, I'm over it.<br><br>498<br>00:34:32,280 --> 00:34:34,160<br>Just done with it.<br><br>499<br>00:34:34,160 --> 00:34:38,920<br>But fair play to people for jumping on the bandwagon and trying to make hay when the<br><br>500<br>00:34:38,920 --> 00:34:39,920<br>sun is shining.<br><br>501<br>00:34:39,920 --> 00:34:45,760<br>If you've been listening to the leaders in this space that quite literally, the Sam Altman<br><br>502<br>00:34:45,760 --> 00:34:51,560<br>of this world, he's a CEO of OpenAI if people aren't aware.<br><br>503<br>00:34:51,560 --> 00:34:58,360<br>He said recently that ideally prompt engineering isn't going to be a thing.<br><br>504<br>00:34:58,360 --> 00:35:04,240<br>You're not going to need to engineer a prompt because in the future, the AI, the language<br><br>505<br>00:35:04,240 --> 00:35:11,000<br>models will just be so good at understanding your intent that you don't need to engineer<br><br>506<br>00:35:11,000 --> 00:35:12,440<br>or craft these prompts.<br><br>507<br>00:35:12,440 --> 00:35:18,440<br>So fair play if you want to make the 6,000th version of the same carousel and get a few<br><br>508<br>00:35:18,440 --> 00:35:22,000<br>likes, tweets, and reposts and go for it.<br><br>509<br>00:35:22,000 --> 00:35:25,360<br>But I wouldn't be looking at it as a long-term strategy.<br><br>510<br>00:35:25,360 --> 00:35:26,360<br>Yeah, agreed.<br><br>511<br>00:35:26,360 --> 00:35:28,360<br>That sounds great, Martin.<br><br>512<br>00:35:28,360 --> 00:35:33,520<br>I certainly look forward to the day when the tools are good enough to understand our intent<br><br>513<br>00:35:33,520 --> 00:35:39,880<br>enough that we don't need to worry about that too much.<br><br>514<br>00:35:39,880 --> 00:35:45,920<br>Last part of today's podcast then, we're going to look at our tool of the week.<br><br>515<br>00:35:45,920 --> 00:35:49,880<br>This week, you're going to take us through Market Muse, Martin, something you've been<br><br>516<br>00:35:49,880 --> 00:35:50,880<br>using a lot of.<br><br>517<br>00:35:50,880 --> 00:35:52,280<br>I'm particularly excited to get into this.<br><br>518<br>00:35:52,280 --> 00:35:57,120<br>I have not used it much and it's not a generative AI tool.<br><br>519<br>00:35:57,120 --> 00:35:58,120<br>Hurrah!<br><br>520<br>00:35:58,120 --> 00:36:01,680<br>AI can help with huge amounts of things, help marketers be more effective.<br><br>521<br>00:36:01,680 --> 00:36:05,920<br>We've heard so much about tools that can create images and texts and video.<br><br>522<br>00:36:05,920 --> 00:36:08,600<br>Let's dive a bit more into Market Muse, Martin.<br><br>523<br>00:36:08,600 --> 00:36:14,000<br>Tell us a bit more about what it is and what it does and who it's for.<br><br>524<br>00:36:14,000 --> 00:36:20,340<br>Market Muse is for any marketing team that produces content and has content at the heart<br><br>525<br>00:36:20,340 --> 00:36:22,960<br>of their strategy.<br><br>526<br>00:36:22,960 --> 00:36:31,120<br>It is a NLP natural language processing powered content optimization tool and it is a beast.<br><br>527<br>00:36:31,120 --> 00:36:32,120<br>I love it.<br><br>528<br>00:36:32,120 --> 00:36:36,240<br>There are two main features of it really.<br><br>529<br>00:36:36,240 --> 00:36:47,600<br>They have the single page optimization element and you can do research and then optimization<br><br>530<br>00:36:47,600 --> 00:36:55,160<br>or you've got, if you go for the premium tier plan, they've got a tool called inventory<br><br>531<br>00:36:55,160 --> 00:36:59,440<br>and this is where you get full site-wide optimization.<br><br>532<br>00:36:59,440 --> 00:37:01,080<br>How does it all work?<br><br>533<br>00:37:01,080 --> 00:37:05,720<br>You start off by putting in your keywords and what they do, you put in your keyword<br><br>534<br>00:37:05,720 --> 00:37:12,120<br>or your key phrase and it will scrape the SERPs, the search engine results pages, get<br><br>535<br>00:37:12,120 --> 00:37:19,440<br>all of the top results for say like the top 30 pages and it will read those pages.<br><br>536<br>00:37:19,440 --> 00:37:25,800<br>Then using natural language processes, it creates a kind of topic model for that keyword.<br><br>537<br>00:37:25,800 --> 00:37:32,360<br>Let's say you want to rank for Premier League football.<br><br>538<br>00:37:32,360 --> 00:37:35,960<br>If you write an article about Premier League football, you're going to have to talk about<br><br>539<br>00:37:35,960 --> 00:37:38,680<br>things like the clubs.<br><br>540<br>00:37:38,680 --> 00:37:41,600<br>You're going to have to talk about Manchester United, Arsenal, Man City.<br><br>541<br>00:37:41,600 --> 00:37:43,560<br>Not Derby County though, aren't they?<br><br>542<br>00:37:43,560 --> 00:37:47,800<br>You would not be focusing much on Derby County unless you mentioned that the worst team in<br><br>543<br>00:37:47,800 --> 00:37:55,320<br>Premier League history was Derby County with 11 points in 2006, 2007 or 2007, 2008.<br><br>544<br>00:37:55,320 --> 00:37:56,320<br>I forget.<br><br>545<br>00:37:56,320 --> 00:37:57,320<br>It was all a traumatic experience.<br><br>546<br>00:37:57,320 --> 00:37:58,320<br>We digress.<br><br>547<br>00:37:58,320 --> 00:37:59,320<br>We digress.<br><br>548<br>00:37:59,320 --> 00:38:07,360<br>But yes, you will be talking about these associated topics, these related topics.<br><br>549<br>00:38:07,360 --> 00:38:13,040<br>The idea being that if you want to rank, if you're producing a blog, we all write blogs<br><br>550<br>00:38:13,040 --> 00:38:20,040<br>and write articles with the hopes of getting found in search.<br><br>551<br>00:38:20,040 --> 00:38:24,480<br>Ideally you're doing maybe a topic cluster, you're using pillar content and all of that<br><br>552<br>00:38:24,480 --> 00:38:27,280<br>kind of good stuff for an SEO model.<br><br>553<br>00:38:27,280 --> 00:38:30,760<br>But you still want all of the individual articles to be the best that they can be.<br><br>554<br>00:38:30,760 --> 00:38:33,400<br>You're spending time, effort, energy writing them.<br><br>555<br>00:38:33,400 --> 00:38:39,520<br>With the research tool within MarketMuse, it basically gives you all of the topics and<br><br>556<br>00:38:39,520 --> 00:38:41,480<br>themes that you need to be addressing.<br><br>557<br>00:38:41,480 --> 00:38:44,640<br>It has incredible capabilities.<br><br>558<br>00:38:44,640 --> 00:38:49,440<br>It will just uncover things that when you take a step back from writing an article,<br><br>559<br>00:38:49,440 --> 00:38:52,200<br>you go, it's really obvious I should have spoken about that.<br><br>560<br>00:38:52,200 --> 00:38:56,640<br>I'm writing an article about the Premier League and I didn't mention relegation.<br><br>561<br>00:38:56,640 --> 00:39:01,560<br>Yeah, of course I need to mention relegation and the relegation zone if people are going<br><br>562<br>00:39:01,560 --> 00:39:02,560<br>to...<br><br>563<br>00:39:02,560 --> 00:39:03,760<br>Is that kind of thing.<br><br>564<br>00:39:03,760 --> 00:39:05,960<br>So it is very good.<br><br>565<br>00:39:05,960 --> 00:39:12,560<br>I used it for one article a few, it was about 18 months ago.<br><br>566<br>00:39:12,560 --> 00:39:17,520<br>I wanted to rank for a keyword related to Sostak.<br><br>567<br>00:39:17,520 --> 00:39:21,040<br>This is what really got me excited about the tool, I should say.<br><br>568<br>00:39:21,040 --> 00:39:24,240<br>Sostak, digital marketing planning model.<br><br>569<br>00:39:24,240 --> 00:39:26,880<br>I teach it to my marketing students.<br><br>570<br>00:39:26,880 --> 00:39:29,040<br>I thought, I've got something to say about that.<br><br>571<br>00:39:29,040 --> 00:39:30,040<br>I can share some bits.<br><br>572<br>00:39:30,040 --> 00:39:36,640<br>I've written a few blogs, all of them 1000 to 1500 words long.<br><br>573<br>00:39:36,640 --> 00:39:38,400<br>None of them made an impact.<br><br>574<br>00:39:38,400 --> 00:39:43,080<br>Just I might as well have been leaning out of the window and just shouting Sostak and<br><br>575<br>00:39:43,080 --> 00:39:47,560<br>seeing if anything happened for all the good they did me.<br><br>576<br>00:39:47,560 --> 00:39:54,560<br>I put an article into MarketMuse and it made clear to me that I needed to go into more<br><br>577<br>00:39:54,560 --> 00:39:55,760<br>depth in some areas.<br><br>578<br>00:39:55,760 --> 00:39:58,520<br>I ended up writing an article considerably longer.<br><br>579<br>00:39:58,520 --> 00:40:07,000<br>It was about 80% longer than the previous article I'd written, so just over 2000 words.<br><br>580<br>00:40:07,000 --> 00:40:10,440<br>It started to get traction.<br><br>581<br>00:40:10,440 --> 00:40:15,920<br>Over time it built and built and built because it was a very authoritative piece.<br><br>582<br>00:40:15,920 --> 00:40:24,920<br>Now that blog accounts for anywhere between 700 to 1200 hits on any given month, just<br><br>583<br>00:40:24,920 --> 00:40:26,720<br>that one article alone.<br><br>584<br>00:40:26,720 --> 00:40:29,000<br>I would never have achieved that without MarketMuse.<br><br>585<br>00:40:29,000 --> 00:40:31,400<br>That's just how you optimize one post.<br><br>586<br>00:40:31,400 --> 00:40:36,280<br>If you think about that then scaled across your whole website where it's looking at whole<br><br>587<br>00:40:36,280 --> 00:40:40,120<br>topic gaps in your whole content strategy.<br><br>588<br>00:40:40,120 --> 00:40:44,120<br>It's looking at your competitors and saying, well, they're here and you've got an opportunity<br><br>589<br>00:40:44,120 --> 00:40:47,680<br>to get here just by tweaking a few pages.<br><br>590<br>00:40:47,680 --> 00:40:50,200<br>It's incredibly powerful.<br><br>591<br>00:40:50,200 --> 00:40:56,520<br>What I like about it compared to the generative AI that we've been talking about today is<br><br>592<br>00:40:56,520 --> 00:41:03,480<br>that whereas generative AI can be really useful in creating content or giving you ideas, it<br><br>593<br>00:41:03,480 --> 00:41:06,280<br>doesn't really care about you or your strategy.<br><br>594<br>00:41:06,280 --> 00:41:08,160<br>It doesn't know your business.<br><br>595<br>00:41:08,160 --> 00:41:10,240<br>It doesn't know what you're trying to achieve.<br><br>596<br>00:41:10,240 --> 00:41:12,160<br>It doesn't have any interest in you.<br><br>597<br>00:41:12,160 --> 00:41:15,760<br>It just responds to a prompt.<br><br>598<br>00:41:15,760 --> 00:41:19,200<br>MarketMuse is a really strategic tool.<br><br>599<br>00:41:19,200 --> 00:41:25,040<br>It's strategic and tactical rolled up in one because it helps you set that content strategy<br><br>600<br>00:41:25,040 --> 00:41:30,480<br>and then when you're executing, it helps optimize all of those individual outputs so that you're<br><br>601<br>00:41:30,480 --> 00:41:37,600<br>not wasting time writing articles that are a bit of a damp squib really.<br><br>602<br>00:41:37,600 --> 00:41:38,600<br>Wow.<br><br>603<br>00:41:38,600 --> 00:41:40,400<br>Let me play that back then.<br><br>604<br>00:41:40,400 --> 00:41:42,040<br>I'm a marketer.<br><br>605<br>00:41:42,040 --> 00:41:46,560<br>I'm creating content on my website, blogs or online articles as you mentioned.<br><br>606<br>00:41:46,560 --> 00:41:48,240<br>I've got some keywords I want to rank for.<br><br>607<br>00:41:48,240 --> 00:41:50,880<br>I've produced some content in the past and I got crickets.<br><br>608<br>00:41:50,880 --> 00:41:54,480<br>Didn't rank, didn't get any traffic from Google or other search engines.<br><br>609<br>00:41:54,480 --> 00:42:00,560<br>I could throw that topic into MarketMuse and MarketMuse would identify almost the subtopics<br><br>610<br>00:42:00,560 --> 00:42:06,680<br>that I need to expand in my online article or blog post on that topic in order to be<br><br>611<br>00:42:06,680 --> 00:42:11,880<br>able to be seen as authoritative by Google on the topic and then start ranking.<br><br>612<br>00:42:11,880 --> 00:42:16,960<br>You've done that in exactly that way for a term that's not easy to rank for where you<br><br>613<br>00:42:16,960 --> 00:42:22,120<br>did the work the traditional way, the logical way, but you weren't getting anything.<br><br>614<br>00:42:22,120 --> 00:42:27,720<br>You applied MarketMuse's AI driven intelligence and insights and then you started ranking<br><br>615<br>00:42:27,720 --> 00:42:30,200<br>and getting all this traffic.<br><br>616<br>00:42:30,200 --> 00:42:31,200<br>Exactly that.<br><br>617<br>00:42:31,200 --> 00:42:35,800<br>The process, the actual user interface for doing it is a dream.<br><br>618<br>00:42:35,800 --> 00:42:40,200<br>With the optimized tool, for instance, you put in the keyword that you want to rank for<br><br>619<br>00:42:40,200 --> 00:42:43,580<br>and then you can drop in the URL of a blog post that you've already written.<br><br>620<br>00:42:43,580 --> 00:42:46,280<br>Maybe you've done something that's just not landed.<br><br>621<br>00:42:46,280 --> 00:42:48,880<br>You then hit fetch and run.<br><br>622<br>00:42:48,880 --> 00:42:50,980<br>It then scrapes that article.<br><br>623<br>00:42:50,980 --> 00:42:53,360<br>It runs its research in the backend.<br><br>624<br>00:42:53,360 --> 00:42:59,080<br>It pulls through your article into a very standard kind of Word document rich text editing<br><br>625<br>00:42:59,080 --> 00:43:04,880<br>interface and it has at the sidebar all of the research it's pulled up, all of the topics<br><br>626<br>00:43:04,880 --> 00:43:10,880<br>with suggested distribution and basically how important different keywords are, the<br><br>627<br>00:43:10,880 --> 00:43:12,520<br>weighting of them.<br><br>628<br>00:43:12,520 --> 00:43:16,240<br>It highlights them in your text and it says, yeah, you're using this term, but you're not<br><br>629<br>00:43:16,240 --> 00:43:17,440<br>using this term.<br><br>630<br>00:43:17,440 --> 00:43:24,120<br>You can then just start to add your H2s in, add a new section, write a new paragraph and<br><br>631<br>00:43:24,120 --> 00:43:26,720<br>just tick off all of those bits.<br><br>632<br>00:43:26,720 --> 00:43:29,440<br>Yeah, it's incredibly powerful.<br><br>633<br>00:43:29,440 --> 00:43:31,560<br>It's guiding you through all of that.<br><br>634<br>00:43:31,560 --> 00:43:35,660<br>You don't have to be an SEO pro to be able to do this by the sounds of things.<br><br>635<br>00:43:35,660 --> 00:43:36,660<br>Not at all.<br><br>636<br>00:43:36,660 --> 00:43:45,920<br>I venture to say that you could use this tool without knowing anything about SEO.<br><br>637<br>00:43:45,920 --> 00:43:51,640<br>You wouldn't have to know what a meta title is to be able to just use it.<br><br>638<br>00:43:51,640 --> 00:43:52,640<br>Right.<br><br>639<br>00:43:52,640 --> 00:43:53,640<br>Cool.<br><br>640<br>00:43:53,640 --> 00:43:58,680<br>Well, for those of you then that want to rank better, perhaps have even been producing content<br><br>641<br>00:43:58,680 --> 00:44:02,740<br>on a given topic and haven't got the results that you've been looking for, give Market<br><br>642<br>00:44:02,740 --> 00:44:03,740<br>Music a go.<br><br>643<br>00:44:03,740 --> 00:44:04,740<br>Brilliant.<br><br>644<br>00:44:04,740 --> 00:44:08,480<br>Well, I think that brings us to the end of today's podcast.<br><br>645<br>00:44:08,480 --> 00:44:10,820<br>Thanks very much for your time and your insights, Martin.<br><br>646<br>00:44:10,820 --> 00:44:14,000<br>Always an absolute pleasure to hang out with you.<br><br>647<br>00:44:14,000 --> 00:44:15,880<br>For everybody else, we hope you've enjoyed this.<br><br>648<br>00:44:15,880 --> 00:44:21,800<br>If you have, please do subscribe, share this with your marketing friends who also need<br><br>649<br>00:44:21,800 --> 00:44:28,840<br>to know about AI and tell them about the Artificially Intelligent Marketing podcast.<br><br>650<br>00:44:28,840 --> 00:44:31,680<br>Hopefully we will see you all again next week.<br><br>651<br>00:44:31,680 --> 00:44:34,280<br>If you want to get in touch with us, please do.<br><br>652<br>00:44:34,280 --> 00:44:36,280<br>You'll find us on the LinkedIns and the Twitters.<br><br>653<br>00:44:36,280 --> 00:44:39,580<br>We'd love to hear what you think of the podcast, any thoughts you have, any stories you'd like<br><br>654<br>00:44:39,580 --> 00:44:42,960<br>us to cover and any feedback you've got in general, really.<br><br>655<br>00:44:42,960 --> 00:44:43,960<br>Thank you, Martin.<br><br>656<br>00:44:43,960 --> 00:44:44,960<br>Bye bye.<br><br>657<br>00:44:44,960 --> 00:44:45,960<br>We'll see you next week.<br><br>658<br>00:44:45,960 --> 00:44:46,960<br>See you next week.<br><br>659<br>00:44:46,960 --> 00:44:47,960<br>Cheers.<br><br>660<br>00:44:47,960 --> 00:44:54,000<br>Thank you for listening to Artificially Intelligent Marketing.<br><br>661<br>00:44:54,000 --> 00:45:00,060<br>To stay on top of the latest trends, tips and tools in the world of marketing AI, be<br><br>662<br>00:45:00,060 --> 00:45:01,800<br>sure to subscribe.<br><br>663<br>00:45:01,800 --> 00:45:12,600<br>We look forward to seeing you again next week.<br><br>