WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:02.980
Hi, everyone. I'm Em Gootee from Cincinnati Children's.

00:00:02.980 --> 00:00:06.599
I'm Todd Ponsky. I'm a pediatric surgeon at Cincinnati

00:00:06.599 --> 00:00:08.960
Children's Hospital. And today, we're doing another

00:00:08.960 --> 00:00:11.720
episode of one of our most popular podcasts,

00:00:12.240 --> 00:00:15.039
Case -Based Journal Review. In this episode,

00:00:15.140 --> 00:00:17.559
we will talk about inguinal hernia by reviewing

00:00:17.559 --> 00:00:21.019
some recent literature brought by Dr. Jose Campos.

00:00:21.660 --> 00:00:24.800
Hi, I'm Jose Campos. I work in Santiago de Chile

00:00:24.800 --> 00:00:28.120
in Hospital Roberto del Rio, and I lead a group

00:00:28.120 --> 00:00:31.399
of volunteers under the wing of the Chilean Society

00:00:31.399 --> 00:00:34.340
for Pediatric Surgery. We call ourselves Journal

00:00:34.340 --> 00:00:37.299
Hive, and we're trying to filter the best literature

00:00:37.299 --> 00:00:40.320
to make it easy for you to change your practice.

00:00:40.740 --> 00:00:43.700
Like always, we link the articles in the description

00:00:43.700 --> 00:00:47.420
below. So, Todd, you are asked to repair a unilateral

00:00:47.420 --> 00:00:51.039
uncomplicated inguinal hernia in the NICU. The

00:00:51.039 --> 00:00:54.380
patient is a male infant born at 29 weeks of

00:00:54.380 --> 00:00:57.600
gestation who currently depends on oxygen delivered

00:00:57.600 --> 00:01:00.759
via nasal cannula. He has no other significant

00:01:00.759 --> 00:01:03.420
comorbidities. Would you recommend repairing

00:01:03.420 --> 00:01:07.079
the hernia before or after discharge? So these

00:01:07.079 --> 00:01:10.420
babies have a very high rate of incarceration.

00:01:11.500 --> 00:01:15.299
So I tend to repair these before they leave the

00:01:15.299 --> 00:01:18.159
hospital. Todd mentions that he would be willing

00:01:18.159 --> 00:01:20.840
to let them go home if he feels that the family

00:01:20.840 --> 00:01:23.379
could be trusted to evaluate and bring them to

00:01:23.379 --> 00:01:26.900
the hospital if there was an issue. And I even

00:01:26.900 --> 00:01:29.040
sometimes can teach them how to reduce it. But

00:01:29.040 --> 00:01:30.840
for the most part, I do it before they leave

00:01:30.840 --> 00:01:34.159
the hospital. What do you do, Jose? So I learned

00:01:34.159 --> 00:01:37.560
to do the repair before discharge just because.

00:01:38.189 --> 00:01:40.209
What I've learned is that the younger the baby,

00:01:40.349 --> 00:01:43.469
the higher the risk of incarceration. So normally

00:01:43.469 --> 00:01:47.469
we just tell the NICU to wait for the best moment.

00:01:47.609 --> 00:01:50.250
The best moment would be just before discharge,

00:01:50.609 --> 00:01:53.209
when everything related to the prematurity of

00:01:53.209 --> 00:01:56.030
the baby has just settled down. We would just

00:01:56.030 --> 00:01:58.090
ask them to let us know two weeks before, and

00:01:58.090 --> 00:02:00.689
then we would have enough time to organize a

00:02:00.689 --> 00:02:03.450
semi -elective surgery just before they go home.

00:02:03.670 --> 00:02:05.969
And this has been a longstanding question for

00:02:05.969 --> 00:02:08.719
pediatric surgeons. Because you're balancing

00:02:08.719 --> 00:02:13.039
medical complications of doing a surgery in a

00:02:13.039 --> 00:02:15.620
premature baby and actually making everything

00:02:15.620 --> 00:02:18.699
worse with your anesthesia. But if you let them

00:02:18.699 --> 00:02:21.620
go and bring them back another time, you're increasing

00:02:21.620 --> 00:02:24.400
the possibility of emergency surgery. Because

00:02:24.400 --> 00:02:27.520
of complications like incarcerated hernia and

00:02:27.520 --> 00:02:30.479
other things. That's why we brought this article,

00:02:30.539 --> 00:02:33.180
which I think has the possibility to change our

00:02:33.180 --> 00:02:35.699
practice. Let's take a look at our first article.

00:02:36.250 --> 00:02:39.150
Effect of early versus late inguinal hernia repair

00:02:39.150 --> 00:02:42.289
on serious adverse events rates in preterm infants.

00:02:42.590 --> 00:02:46.090
A randomized clinical trial. This multicenter

00:02:46.090 --> 00:02:48.789
study included preterm infants with inguinal

00:02:48.789 --> 00:02:52.009
hernia diagnosed during their initial hospitalization

00:02:52.009 --> 00:02:57.990
between 2013 and 2021 at 39 different U .S. hospitals.

00:02:58.430 --> 00:03:01.210
This is a really big... trial first published

00:03:01.210 --> 00:03:04.370
in JAMA. It's really really difficult to organize

00:03:04.370 --> 00:03:08.449
39 centers to get enough recruitment for pediatric

00:03:08.449 --> 00:03:11.229
surgery and even harder for premature babies

00:03:11.229 --> 00:03:13.870
to for their parents to give consensus. In this

00:03:13.870 --> 00:03:18.889
paper they had 308 patients, 159 in the early

00:03:18.889 --> 00:03:22.400
repair group, when 149 in the late repair group.

00:03:22.539 --> 00:03:25.240
44 patients in the early repair group versus

00:03:25.240 --> 00:03:28.780
27 in the late repair group had at least one

00:03:28.780 --> 00:03:33.060
serious adverse event, which makes 28 % versus

00:03:33.060 --> 00:03:37.340
18 % respectively. I read this article very carefully

00:03:37.340 --> 00:03:39.789
and I said, look, I could actually change my

00:03:39.789 --> 00:03:41.969
practice and actually sending the baby home,

00:03:42.030 --> 00:03:45.050
I could reduce the hospital stay and more importantly,

00:03:45.090 --> 00:03:48.069
reduce the chance of them having a serious adverse

00:03:48.069 --> 00:03:51.449
effect by 10%. I thought to myself that that

00:03:51.449 --> 00:03:54.030
was really significant. When we look at the data,

00:03:54.150 --> 00:03:57.229
we see that one of the 16 adverse events that

00:03:57.229 --> 00:04:00.509
accounted for the composite outcome is recurrence,

00:04:00.550 --> 00:04:03.990
which is less than 1%, and incarceration, which

00:04:03.990 --> 00:04:07.030
is around 4 % for late repair. For me, the main

00:04:07.030 --> 00:04:11.599
takeaway is that The reason I was doing early

00:04:11.599 --> 00:04:14.599
repair might not be true. In the early group,

00:04:14.680 --> 00:04:17.620
they found only 4 % of spontaneous resolution.

00:04:18.040 --> 00:04:21.579
And in the late group, they found 11 % of spontaneous

00:04:21.579 --> 00:04:24.740
resolution. So not only do they not have a higher

00:04:24.740 --> 00:04:27.779
rate of inguinal hernia complications, but waiting

00:04:27.779 --> 00:04:30.379
could also increase the likelihood of hernia

00:04:30.379 --> 00:04:33.819
disappearing completely. Got it. Did they mention

00:04:33.819 --> 00:04:37.540
if any of those had... loss like dead bowel do

00:04:37.540 --> 00:04:39.860
they even talk about serious events or is it

00:04:39.860 --> 00:04:41.959
just that they had to come back to have it pushed

00:04:41.959 --> 00:04:45.720
back in again one had a bowel injury during repair

00:04:45.720 --> 00:04:48.660
but there's no mention yeah if you tell me that

00:04:48.660 --> 00:04:51.959
there was zero incidence of bowel loss which

00:04:51.959 --> 00:04:55.000
is really what you care about so if you're asking

00:04:55.000 --> 00:04:57.160
me if this would lead me to potentially change

00:04:57.160 --> 00:05:01.459
my practice it actually may I did not think at

00:05:01.459 --> 00:05:02.980
the beginning you were going to convince me.

00:05:03.040 --> 00:05:05.720
I do have some caveats for this study, but I

00:05:05.720 --> 00:05:07.839
would like to listen to Todd's opinion before

00:05:07.839 --> 00:05:11.500
going into the second part of my argumentation.

00:05:11.740 --> 00:05:14.819
It seems like it's a well -done study with pretty

00:05:14.819 --> 00:05:18.100
clear evidence that there were more re -intubations,

00:05:18.139 --> 00:05:22.300
more apnea in the early repair, and the incidence

00:05:22.300 --> 00:05:25.680
of what we all fear was very low. Todd also thinks

00:05:25.680 --> 00:05:28.399
that the reason these numbers might be so low

00:05:28.399 --> 00:05:30.740
is because these parents go home with education,

00:05:31.100 --> 00:05:33.600
as opposed to somebody who just happens to have

00:05:33.600 --> 00:05:35.860
a hernia at home. And they don't know how to

00:05:35.860 --> 00:05:38.279
push it back in if they're being taught to try

00:05:38.279 --> 00:05:41.199
to reduce it at home or to come back immediately

00:05:41.199 --> 00:05:44.100
when they see it. In this paper, authors looked

00:05:44.100 --> 00:05:47.459
into 16 adverse events as a composite outcome,

00:05:47.680 --> 00:05:51.180
including apnea, prolonged intubation, inguinal

00:05:51.180 --> 00:05:53.779
hernia complications like recurrence, incarceration,

00:05:54.279 --> 00:05:57.420
and reoperation. I think just choosing something

00:05:57.420 --> 00:06:00.699
very serious like death or reoperation, given

00:06:00.699 --> 00:06:04.220
that the numbers in each group are so small,

00:06:04.379 --> 00:06:08.279
to have that as a primary outcome, I haven't

00:06:08.279 --> 00:06:09.959
done the math, but probably would have required

00:06:09.959 --> 00:06:12.420
more than a thousand of patients on each arm.

00:06:12.540 --> 00:06:15.620
So I think that's why they came out with this

00:06:15.620 --> 00:06:19.089
composite outcome. Jose, I would just say the

00:06:19.089 --> 00:06:21.129
same thing, that it would change my practice

00:06:21.129 --> 00:06:23.610
and I'd be more willing to send patients home,

00:06:23.670 --> 00:06:28.069
where before I rarely did. But I would individualize

00:06:28.069 --> 00:06:30.850
it based on how far away they live, discussing

00:06:30.850 --> 00:06:33.170
it with the parents and their confidence level

00:06:33.170 --> 00:06:36.529
and comfort level in having them be at home.

00:06:36.709 --> 00:06:39.649
So you look at the home -going situation. You

00:06:39.649 --> 00:06:42.310
talk to the parents, you look at all the factors

00:06:42.310 --> 00:06:45.490
of the patient. But what this paper does is it

00:06:45.490 --> 00:06:48.649
tells pediatric surgeons that sending them home

00:06:48.649 --> 00:06:52.310
is generally safe and maybe safer, and it is

00:06:52.310 --> 00:06:55.430
an option if in the past it was not an option

00:06:55.430 --> 00:06:59.449
for them. Yeah, I agree with that. And just to

00:06:59.449 --> 00:07:02.230
be fair, we need to say to our audience that

00:07:02.230 --> 00:07:05.009
this article is quite powerful, but it does have

00:07:05.009 --> 00:07:08.209
some... Downside to it. Here, Jose is talking

00:07:08.209 --> 00:07:11.350
about how the study was terminated early, had

00:07:11.350 --> 00:07:13.889
a low recruitment rate, and ended up having less

00:07:13.889 --> 00:07:16.470
statistical power than initially calculated.

00:07:16.889 --> 00:07:19.709
I guess this would change my practice, but I

00:07:19.709 --> 00:07:22.769
don't think everything is said in this particular

00:07:22.769 --> 00:07:25.930
topic or question. Let's move to the second question.

00:07:26.290 --> 00:07:29.470
You receive a referral from a nearby town located

00:07:29.470 --> 00:07:33.060
70 miles from your hospital. A pediatrician is

00:07:33.060 --> 00:07:35.319
referring an eight -month -old female with a

00:07:35.319 --> 00:07:38.920
reducible inguinal hernia. Todd, how would you

00:07:38.920 --> 00:07:41.480
organize the surgery regarding pre -op and post

00:07:41.480 --> 00:07:45.620
-op visits? It depends on where I'm operating.

00:07:45.839 --> 00:07:49.879
When I operate in Akron, we would get to see

00:07:49.879 --> 00:07:52.779
the patient, evaluate the patient, and schedule

00:07:52.779 --> 00:07:56.779
them for surgery. So two different cases. If

00:07:56.779 --> 00:08:00.629
Todd examines the hernia and he feels it, or

00:08:00.629 --> 00:08:03.750
if he has a strong confidence in the way it was

00:08:03.750 --> 00:08:06.870
described to him that there truly was a hernia.

00:08:07.029 --> 00:08:09.629
Either of those, I'll schedule the patient, don't

00:08:09.629 --> 00:08:12.970
get an ultrasound. If I am in Cincinnati, they

00:08:12.970 --> 00:08:17.269
do have a same -day -same -day, they call it.

00:08:17.389 --> 00:08:19.569
This same -day -same -day system is available

00:08:19.569 --> 00:08:22.829
at Cincinnati Children's two days a week. Patients

00:08:22.829 --> 00:08:25.250
are evaluated in the morning and the OR is set

00:08:25.250 --> 00:08:28.079
up in the afternoon. And then they get a phone

00:08:28.079 --> 00:08:30.620
follow -up after two weeks if that is the preferred

00:08:30.620 --> 00:08:33.980
method as opposed to coming in. So basically,

00:08:34.000 --> 00:08:37.120
they only have one total visit. But it's not

00:08:37.120 --> 00:08:40.179
every single patient. It's just offered as an

00:08:40.179 --> 00:08:44.600
option. How does post -op follow -up work? In

00:08:44.600 --> 00:08:47.539
Akron, I don't have physical follow -up. We do

00:08:47.539 --> 00:08:50.360
phone follow -up for most of our post -ops. In

00:08:50.360 --> 00:08:53.200
Akron, they have a very deliberate form. Advanced

00:08:53.200 --> 00:08:55.899
practice providers like nurses, nurse practitioners,

00:08:56.019 --> 00:08:58.679
or physician assistants call the patients' families,

00:08:59.039 --> 00:09:01.340
go through the questions, and if the answer to

00:09:01.340 --> 00:09:03.740
any of them are concerning, they ask families

00:09:03.740 --> 00:09:06.399
to come into the office, or they can go see a

00:09:06.399 --> 00:09:08.700
pediatrician. That's how we do almost all of

00:09:08.700 --> 00:09:10.539
our follow -ups. However, if they want to come

00:09:10.539 --> 00:09:13.240
see us, absolutely they can come see us. Was

00:09:13.240 --> 00:09:16.240
this always like that, or did... this change

00:09:16.240 --> 00:09:20.019
after COVID? It was always like that since probably

00:09:20.019 --> 00:09:23.620
2015. So what's your situation, Jose? So after

00:09:23.620 --> 00:09:26.120
COVID, we do have like video conference for a

00:09:26.120 --> 00:09:28.759
limited amount of patients. But what we normally

00:09:28.759 --> 00:09:32.440
would do, I would say most centers in Chile is

00:09:32.440 --> 00:09:36.100
just bring the patient in, like physically check

00:09:36.100 --> 00:09:39.480
for the hernia. send them home, schedule the

00:09:39.480 --> 00:09:41.620
surgery for another day, and then bring them

00:09:41.620 --> 00:09:44.259
back for a physical follow -up visit. The only

00:09:44.259 --> 00:09:46.700
ones that don't get these treatments are the

00:09:46.700 --> 00:09:49.659
ones that live really, really far away. But if

00:09:49.659 --> 00:09:52.759
you really live that far away, usually you get

00:09:52.759 --> 00:09:55.870
to a different hospital. For inguinal hernia,

00:09:56.029 --> 00:09:58.690
the case you mentioned, we would do three visits.

00:09:58.889 --> 00:10:01.730
And that's why I wanted to highlight this point.

00:10:01.809 --> 00:10:03.850
And that's why I find this article that you're

00:10:03.850 --> 00:10:07.210
about to talk to us so interesting and so potentially

00:10:07.210 --> 00:10:10.289
practice changing. And let's look at our article.

00:10:10.669 --> 00:10:13.830
One -stop surgery, an innovation to limit hospital

00:10:13.830 --> 00:10:16.289
visits in children. This is an article from the

00:10:16.289 --> 00:10:18.759
Netherlands. It is a prospective observational

00:10:18.759 --> 00:10:21.799
study of children older than three months with

00:10:21.799 --> 00:10:26.059
inguinal hernia and ASA grade 1 or 2. There were

00:10:26.059 --> 00:10:30.039
91 patients, 54 of them were one -stop surgery,

00:10:30.240 --> 00:10:34.399
and 37 was usual care. All but one of the one

00:10:34.399 --> 00:10:36.740
-stop surgery patients were discharged home on

00:10:36.740 --> 00:10:39.379
the day of the surgery. Post -op complication

00:10:39.379 --> 00:10:42.200
and recurrence rates did not differ between the

00:10:42.200 --> 00:10:45.000
intervention and control patients. General satisfaction

00:10:45.000 --> 00:10:47.879
and inclusion of family were higher after one

00:10:47.879 --> 00:10:50.399
stop surgery experience. Look, I don't know.

00:10:50.539 --> 00:10:53.899
I would be very happy to embrace this change.

00:10:54.039 --> 00:10:57.519
So far, it has changed my mind, but not my practice.

00:10:57.779 --> 00:11:00.940
Whenever we talk to the surgeons, they state

00:11:00.940 --> 00:11:03.759
two obstacles for this. First one is diagnostic

00:11:03.759 --> 00:11:07.360
uncertainty. The more rigid. teaching at least

00:11:07.360 --> 00:11:09.919
for me in Chile has been that if you don't feel

00:11:09.919 --> 00:11:12.919
the hernia for yourself you do not operate on

00:11:12.919 --> 00:11:15.799
that child you know and that's why I was so glad

00:11:15.799 --> 00:11:19.080
to read this because there was no diagnostic

00:11:19.080 --> 00:11:21.379
uncertainty in this program. And the second one

00:11:21.379 --> 00:11:24.179
is family satisfaction. What we're actually learning

00:11:24.179 --> 00:11:26.320
from this study although I'm not sure it's going

00:11:26.320 --> 00:11:30.059
to be applicable to our cultural environment

00:11:30.059 --> 00:11:33.200
in Chile, people actually enjoying their time

00:11:33.200 --> 00:11:36.100
and they're very happy with a phone consult and

00:11:36.100 --> 00:11:38.919
not necessarily they need to come in. We learned

00:11:38.919 --> 00:11:41.740
from Jose that he was taught that patients' families

00:11:41.740 --> 00:11:44.460
prefer to see the person responsible for their

00:11:44.460 --> 00:11:48.539
operation, aka the surgeon, in an in -person

00:11:48.539 --> 00:11:51.019
follow -up setting. Todd's practice is already

00:11:51.019 --> 00:11:53.580
halfway. They were able to do it in two visits

00:11:53.580 --> 00:11:57.549
instead of we in three, but I'm... very open

00:11:57.549 --> 00:12:00.909
to do it in just one visit. Jose wanted to add

00:12:00.909 --> 00:12:03.230
that last month there was an article published

00:12:03.230 --> 00:12:05.929
in the Surgery Journal. They were asking themselves,

00:12:06.289 --> 00:12:08.309
how many times do you find something that would

00:12:08.309 --> 00:12:11.450
alter your management for routine pediatric surgical

00:12:11.450 --> 00:12:15.070
conditions like circumcision or ketopexy, inguinal

00:12:15.070 --> 00:12:18.190
hernia, and so on? And the answer was less than

00:12:18.190 --> 00:12:21.450
1%. Of course, we've added this article in the

00:12:21.450 --> 00:12:23.669
description below if you'd like to read and learn

00:12:23.669 --> 00:12:26.289
more. Actually, there might be a benefit of...

00:12:26.539 --> 00:12:28.980
Leaving the family, I wouldn't say alone, but

00:12:28.980 --> 00:12:32.379
just give them a phone call or just give them

00:12:32.379 --> 00:12:35.000
really, really good instructions to get in touch

00:12:35.000 --> 00:12:37.519
if there's a problem. I would assume this is

00:12:37.519 --> 00:12:40.100
independent of the physician, but the hospital

00:12:40.100 --> 00:12:42.519
also needs to provide resources to make it a

00:12:42.519 --> 00:12:45.539
one -stop solution, right? Yes, it is. It has

00:12:45.539 --> 00:12:49.240
to be done in a high resource setting, I think.

00:12:49.419 --> 00:12:51.919
The last article, we were okay sending patients

00:12:51.919 --> 00:12:53.980
home because the incidence of a problem is very

00:12:53.980 --> 00:12:56.090
low. You have to apply the same thing here. That

00:12:56.090 --> 00:12:59.409
if you look at how often you find a problem when

00:12:59.409 --> 00:13:02.269
someone comes back to you for a post -op hernia

00:13:02.269 --> 00:13:06.789
is probably in the hundredths of a decimal. There's

00:13:06.789 --> 00:13:09.230
one thing that this article says that I was touched

00:13:09.230 --> 00:13:12.549
by this phrase. When you were facing medical

00:13:12.549 --> 00:13:16.690
problems with a low risk of complications, then

00:13:16.690 --> 00:13:20.200
family satisfaction becomes... A surrogate for

00:13:20.200 --> 00:13:23.159
quality. Think about how many unnecessary times

00:13:23.159 --> 00:13:25.080
people are coming back to the hospital for a

00:13:25.080 --> 00:13:27.120
visit for social reasons. Leave it up to the

00:13:27.120 --> 00:13:30.720
parents. Some want to come. Let them come. But

00:13:30.720 --> 00:13:33.500
some don't. So you give them the choice. I really

00:13:33.500 --> 00:13:35.899
like your approach of offering this to the family

00:13:35.899 --> 00:13:37.580
instead of saying, no, we're not going to see

00:13:37.580 --> 00:13:39.740
you. We're going to call you. But this opens

00:13:39.740 --> 00:13:42.639
the possibility of offering both and just adapt

00:13:42.639 --> 00:13:45.740
to what's better for this. family in particular.

00:13:45.980 --> 00:13:48.679
So, Todd, you perform a laparoscopic inguinal

00:13:48.679 --> 00:13:52.980
hernia repair on this patient and find a contralateral

00:13:52.980 --> 00:13:56.419
patent processus vaginalis. Would you proceed

00:13:56.419 --> 00:13:59.700
to repair the contralateral side as well? What

00:13:59.700 --> 00:14:02.200
is the risk of this patent processus vaginalis

00:14:02.200 --> 00:14:05.259
progressing into a clinically evident inguinal

00:14:05.259 --> 00:14:09.320
hernia? If I go in and I do a pyloric stenosis

00:14:09.320 --> 00:14:13.120
and I see an incidental patent processes, I leave

00:14:13.120 --> 00:14:16.139
it alone. If I am going in to do an inguinal

00:14:16.139 --> 00:14:19.320
hernia repair, before the operation, I have the

00:14:19.320 --> 00:14:21.779
conversation with the parents. What do you want

00:14:21.779 --> 00:14:24.259
me to do if I find a hernia on the other side?

00:14:24.559 --> 00:14:27.220
Todd mentions that he recommends repairing it

00:14:27.220 --> 00:14:29.980
after having a detailed conversation about hernias

00:14:29.980 --> 00:14:32.740
with the family, allowing them to make an informed

00:14:32.740 --> 00:14:36.059
choice. What do you do, Jose? So if I find it

00:14:36.059 --> 00:14:38.120
incidentally in another operation, I do nothing.

00:14:38.440 --> 00:14:41.379
And if the baby has a symptomatic unilateral

00:14:41.379 --> 00:14:44.500
inguinal hair repair, I only that one side. And

00:14:44.500 --> 00:14:47.519
it's very difficult to resist to a temptation

00:14:47.519 --> 00:14:50.080
of repairing the other one. That's usually my

00:14:50.080 --> 00:14:52.500
advice to the parents, but I also have the discussion

00:14:52.500 --> 00:14:55.419
beforehand. Last article of the day is Natural

00:14:55.419 --> 00:14:59.879
History and Consequence of Patent Processes Vaginalis,

00:14:59.940 --> 00:15:02.639
an interim analysis from a multi -institutional

00:15:02.639 --> 00:15:05.799
prospective observational study. Infants under

00:15:05.799 --> 00:15:08.100
four months undergoing laparoscopic pulmonary

00:15:08.100 --> 00:15:11.039
myotomy were enrolled at eight children's hospitals.

00:15:11.299 --> 00:15:15.840
There were 246 eligible infants with PPV, and

00:15:15.840 --> 00:15:20.220
85 % responded to at least one annual follow

00:15:20.220 --> 00:15:23.679
-up. Of all, two patients had an inguinal hernia

00:15:23.679 --> 00:15:27.419
repair for a symptomatic hernia, one had an orchopexy

00:15:27.419 --> 00:15:30.500
and incidental inguinal hernia repair, for a

00:15:30.500 --> 00:15:33.340
total of three hernia repairs. The reason I brought

00:15:33.340 --> 00:15:35.940
this article is that it has a homogeneous cohort.

00:15:36.120 --> 00:15:39.299
It has standardized follow -up. It's multicentric.

00:15:39.559 --> 00:15:42.899
I think it's better quality research than everything

00:15:42.899 --> 00:15:45.259
we've known previously. According to this study,

00:15:45.399 --> 00:15:47.960
the presence of a patent -processed vaginalis

00:15:47.960 --> 00:15:51.440
at the time of palromyotomy was common, but the

00:15:51.440 --> 00:15:54.200
need for hernia repair was around 1 % in the

00:15:54.200 --> 00:15:57.799
first year of follow -up. So that is... To me,

00:15:57.820 --> 00:16:00.200
it's really low. I don't think this is definite

00:16:00.200 --> 00:16:03.720
evidence, and I'll keep my eyes and my ears open

00:16:03.720 --> 00:16:06.179
for the final closure of this follow -up study.

00:16:06.700 --> 00:16:10.899
But if this number is as low as 1%, I would not

00:16:10.899 --> 00:16:14.059
repair the other side. The problem is one year

00:16:14.059 --> 00:16:16.799
is not enough. If you look at the study at a

00:16:16.799 --> 00:16:19.879
Mayo Clinic that Benzendejas wrote when he was

00:16:19.879 --> 00:16:23.740
a resident there, there was a contralateral hernia

00:16:23.740 --> 00:16:26.529
occurrence after a 50 -year follow -up. And again,

00:16:26.629 --> 00:16:28.669
we've added this article in the description below

00:16:28.669 --> 00:16:56.309
if you'd like to read and learn more. Another

00:16:56.309 --> 00:16:58.889
discussion, no, I don't take that into account.

00:16:59.210 --> 00:17:02.870
I think the diagnosis of a hernia changes so

00:17:02.870 --> 00:17:06.170
quickly after you've given different angle of

00:17:06.170 --> 00:17:09.009
your scope or different pressures. To wrap up

00:17:09.009 --> 00:17:11.430
today's discussion, let's review what we learned.

00:17:11.690 --> 00:17:14.349
The first article highlighted that delaying inguinal

00:17:14.349 --> 00:17:17.509
hernia repair in preterm infants does not result

00:17:17.509 --> 00:17:20.730
in more complications, suggesting that surgical

00:17:20.730 --> 00:17:23.819
timing should be tailored to each case. We also

00:17:23.819 --> 00:17:26.480
explored the benefits of one -stop surgery models,

00:17:26.759 --> 00:17:29.960
which streamlined the process, reduced hospital

00:17:29.960 --> 00:17:33.059
visits, and increased patient satisfaction without

00:17:33.059 --> 00:17:36.200
raising complications. Finally, we examined the

00:17:36.200 --> 00:17:39.960
likelihood of a patent processus vaginalis progressing

00:17:39.960 --> 00:17:42.940
into asymptomatic hernia, which found to be low.

00:17:43.180 --> 00:17:46.160
Therefore, if found incidentally during surgery

00:17:46.160 --> 00:17:49.279
for unilateral hernia, repairing the contralateral

00:17:49.279 --> 00:17:52.720
side may not always be necessary. Though discussions

00:17:52.720 --> 00:17:55.539
with parents are crucial before making this decision.

00:17:55.819 --> 00:17:58.079
Final comment I want to make is we've been dealing

00:17:58.079 --> 00:18:01.079
with this pathology for a hundred years and we

00:18:01.079 --> 00:18:03.640
still don't know the natural history of PPVs

00:18:03.640 --> 00:18:06.079
and inguinal hernias. And I'm just happy that

00:18:06.079 --> 00:18:08.420
these three articles that we brought are bringing

00:18:08.420 --> 00:18:13.539
freshness or novelty or curiosity for some things

00:18:13.539 --> 00:18:16.019
that have been taught very dogmatically, like

00:18:16.019 --> 00:18:18.930
the discussions we've had. Yeah. No, I think

00:18:18.930 --> 00:18:21.509
these are great papers and glad you brought them

00:18:21.509 --> 00:18:23.509
forward. It's good discussion. Thank you for

00:18:23.509 --> 00:18:25.869
listening to this episode. Don't forget to follow

00:18:25.869 --> 00:18:28.009
us on social media, subscribe to our YouTube

00:18:28.009 --> 00:18:30.289
channel, and download the Stay Current app for

00:18:30.289 --> 00:18:32.009
tons of pediatric surgery content.
