WEBVTT

00:00:00.360 --> 00:00:03.180
Hello, I'm James Cridland, the radio futurologist,

00:00:03.180 --> 00:00:05.820
and every week or so I put out an international

00:00:05.820 --> 00:00:09.480
radio trends newsletter, and this is it. From

00:00:09.480 --> 00:00:13.240
October the 12th, 2025, a visualised podcast

00:00:13.240 --> 00:00:18.300
in the flesh. One of the smartest podcasts that

00:00:18.300 --> 00:00:21.980
the Australian ABC produces is called If You're

00:00:21.980 --> 00:00:25.359
Listening by Matt Bevan. I'm Matt Bevan, and

00:00:25.359 --> 00:00:30.969
this is If You're Listening. Now, I link to it

00:00:30.969 --> 00:00:34.909
on YouTube and I link to it on ABC Listen because

00:00:34.909 --> 00:00:38.070
originally an audio podcast, the ABC started

00:00:38.070 --> 00:00:41.990
making it into a video podcast in July 2023.

00:00:42.630 --> 00:00:46.030
The show is very heavy in terms of archive footage.

00:00:46.130 --> 00:00:48.869
And as I understand it, Bevan recalls in both

00:00:48.869 --> 00:00:51.890
video and audio in his basement at home, by the

00:00:51.890 --> 00:00:55.329
way. And then two separate teams go and edit

00:00:55.329 --> 00:00:59.560
it, one for video and one for audio. The audio

00:00:59.560 --> 00:01:04.879
version that I link to in the show notes of the

00:01:04.879 --> 00:01:07.739
same episode is 22 minutes, 28 seconds. The video

00:01:07.739 --> 00:01:11.459
version is 21 minutes, 15. And they are wildly

00:01:11.459 --> 00:01:15.040
different in terms of editing. I show an image

00:01:15.040 --> 00:01:18.359
showing exactly how different they are. And the

00:01:18.359 --> 00:01:20.040
video trial must have been a success because

00:01:20.040 --> 00:01:22.680
the audio version now airs on ABC Radio National.

00:01:22.799 --> 00:01:25.780
The video version airs on the ABC News Channel.

00:01:26.599 --> 00:01:29.379
A lot of the times we hear a visualised podcast

00:01:29.379 --> 00:01:32.920
being touted as something that's just a TV chat

00:01:32.920 --> 00:01:35.799
show with a cheaper set. It's easy to film a

00:01:35.799 --> 00:01:39.500
chat cast, a simple interview with two people

00:01:39.500 --> 00:01:42.719
on video. You just run a few cameras and you

00:01:42.719 --> 00:01:45.159
can even mix automatically between them if you

00:01:45.159 --> 00:01:47.359
want. And with an online tool like Riverside,

00:01:47.379 --> 00:01:50.540
you get a mixed video file free as part of the

00:01:50.540 --> 00:01:53.340
deal. If you want, you've probably seen something

00:01:53.340 --> 00:01:57.319
like that with Diary of a CEO. But this is a

00:01:57.319 --> 00:01:59.980
piece of content that is deliberately remade

00:01:59.980 --> 00:02:02.680
for both types of output. And there's lots to

00:02:02.680 --> 00:02:05.799
learn, I think, from how the ABC do it. The format

00:02:05.799 --> 00:02:08.120
seems almost unique. I don't think I've ever

00:02:08.120 --> 00:02:11.460
seen or heard this sort of thing before. And

00:02:11.460 --> 00:02:14.159
it speaks volumes that the ABC haven't put this

00:02:14.159 --> 00:02:17.909
show onto Spotify in video. Spotify, if you didn't

00:02:17.909 --> 00:02:20.490
know, lets you upload video podcasts directly,

00:02:20.669 --> 00:02:23.949
but when you do that, the audio from the video

00:02:23.949 --> 00:02:26.930
file is what everyone hears. So if you're doing

00:02:26.930 --> 00:02:29.729
two separate edits, as the ABC does, then tough.

00:02:30.030 --> 00:02:33.169
A Spotify listener will just get the audio from

00:02:33.169 --> 00:02:35.949
the video file, and that's not always the right

00:02:35.949 --> 00:02:38.889
plan. Anyway, I tell you all of this because

00:02:38.889 --> 00:02:41.210
Matt Bevan was here in Brisbane last Friday,

00:02:41.250 --> 00:02:43.370
speaking at the Brisbane Writers' Festival. I

00:02:43.370 --> 00:02:45.810
didn't really know what to expect. But in the

00:02:45.810 --> 00:02:48.449
sold -out event, he did an hour -long version

00:02:48.449 --> 00:02:50.909
of the show, complete with hundreds of clips

00:02:50.909 --> 00:02:53.789
of audio and video, talking about why nobody

00:02:53.789 --> 00:02:55.830
can predict the future and why you're a fool

00:02:55.830 --> 00:02:58.789
if you think you can. And I shuffled in my seat

00:02:58.789 --> 00:03:00.930
a little when he started telling people not to

00:03:00.930 --> 00:03:03.530
believe people who call themselves futurologists.

00:03:04.370 --> 00:03:07.599
Yeah. And if I can guess his email address correctly,

00:03:07.819 --> 00:03:09.900
I'm hoping he lets me know what his tech stack

00:03:09.900 --> 00:03:12.240
was for doing the show. I think I could cobble

00:03:12.240 --> 00:03:14.300
together what he did with Keynote, but there's

00:03:14.300 --> 00:03:16.939
a lot of really clever moving pieces as he does

00:03:16.939 --> 00:03:20.039
it. And I suspect he's running something a little

00:03:20.039 --> 00:03:22.319
cleverer. Would love to know. Anyway, the show

00:03:22.319 --> 00:03:25.319
is worth a listen or a watch if you haven't seen

00:03:25.319 --> 00:03:30.120
it. Now in Germany, Radio Zeit is keen to highlight

00:03:30.120 --> 00:03:32.879
a new patent. for producing a cost -effective

00:03:32.879 --> 00:03:35.879
real -time transcription and visual display of

00:03:35.879 --> 00:03:38.900
live audio. It's a really nice thing. It makes

00:03:38.900 --> 00:03:42.680
radio significantly more accessible. Not just

00:03:42.680 --> 00:03:45.039
that, but they've also launched a full monitoring

00:03:45.039 --> 00:03:47.419
tool for radio stations, so you can search through

00:03:47.419 --> 00:03:50.199
shows and be able to categorise elements and

00:03:50.199 --> 00:03:52.680
all of that kind of thing. Very impressive set

00:03:52.680 --> 00:03:55.699
of tools from a small German company. It's worth

00:03:55.699 --> 00:03:58.960
a look. Now, emergency broadcasting. I might

00:03:58.960 --> 00:04:01.819
be doing a talk in a month or so about radio's

00:04:01.819 --> 00:04:04.219
emergency broadcasting, giving some good examples.

00:04:04.800 --> 00:04:07.300
of radio stations producing emergency broadcasting

00:04:07.300 --> 00:04:09.560
that connected with audiences who needed it.

00:04:09.680 --> 00:04:11.819
And one of the benefits of being independent,

00:04:12.039 --> 00:04:14.219
as I am, is that I'm able to talk about anybody,

00:04:14.460 --> 00:04:17.680
commercial, public, community, and able to talk

00:04:17.680 --> 00:04:20.699
about both programming solutions to emergency

00:04:20.699 --> 00:04:23.480
situations, but also engineering solutions too.

00:04:23.560 --> 00:04:26.120
The famed radio in a suitcase temporary solution,

00:04:26.259 --> 00:04:29.759
or another solution that I'm aware of that broadcasts

00:04:29.759 --> 00:04:32.180
radio with nothing more than an internet -enabled

00:04:32.180 --> 00:04:35.709
mobile phone. and a bucket. And if you've got

00:04:35.709 --> 00:04:38.490
any good examples or stories that you would like

00:04:38.490 --> 00:04:41.490
me to share at an international broadcast conference,

00:04:41.730 --> 00:04:44.189
please do let me know. I would like to be able

00:04:44.189 --> 00:04:48.310
to play some video and play some audio and maybe

00:04:48.310 --> 00:04:51.329
even do some magic translating that audio into

00:04:51.329 --> 00:04:54.250
English. Who knows? My email is james at cred

00:04:54.250 --> 00:04:58.560
.land. Interesting to read the howls of protests

00:04:58.560 --> 00:05:01.680
from the Australian radio industry after I suggested

00:05:01.680 --> 00:05:04.660
last week that the regulator ACMA should suspend

00:05:04.660 --> 00:05:07.720
Kyle and Jackie O from the airwaves and shift

00:05:07.720 --> 00:05:11.319
them to an age -protected online live stream.

00:05:11.839 --> 00:05:15.040
Reaction to this was fascinating and really clear.

00:05:15.360 --> 00:05:19.620
Anyone not involved with the radio industry wholeheartedly

00:05:19.620 --> 00:05:22.430
agreed with me. And they were astonished that

00:05:22.430 --> 00:05:24.310
Carl and Jackie had been allowed to broadcast

00:05:24.310 --> 00:05:27.290
this obscene content for so long. Meanwhile,

00:05:27.670 --> 00:05:30.509
anyone that was involved in the commercial radio

00:05:30.509 --> 00:05:33.910
industry was totally horrified that I'd suggested

00:05:33.910 --> 00:05:36.790
that media regulator ACMA actually do some media

00:05:36.790 --> 00:05:39.649
regulation. But people can just turn off, can't

00:05:39.649 --> 00:05:42.430
they? Was one response. Another person telling

00:05:42.430 --> 00:05:45.449
me to let the market decide. Another deciding

00:05:45.449 --> 00:05:47.730
that all the show needed was another censor,

00:05:47.730 --> 00:05:50.430
but this time an independent one. Not a single

00:05:50.430 --> 00:05:54.470
person involved in radio suggested that ARN,

00:05:54.470 --> 00:05:57.610
as the licensed broadcaster, deserved any punishment

00:05:57.610 --> 00:06:01.269
or had any responsibility. Yet every single one

00:06:01.269 --> 00:06:03.790
also said that they didn't defend the content.

00:06:04.170 --> 00:06:07.069
The difference here was really stark, really

00:06:07.069 --> 00:06:09.829
obvious. To me, it's really clear that this is

00:06:09.829 --> 00:06:11.930
now a systemic issue in the commercial radio

00:06:11.930 --> 00:06:14.670
industry, not just a one -off. There is a genuine

00:06:14.670 --> 00:06:17.350
belief. that obscene content on the radio is

00:06:17.350 --> 00:06:21.170
just fine, and I'm the whinging pom for objecting

00:06:21.170 --> 00:06:23.930
to it. Meanwhile, of course, no word from ACMA

00:06:23.930 --> 00:06:26.810
on their next move, if indeed there even is one.

00:06:28.250 --> 00:06:30.529
The BBC's radio stations fell off tune in last

00:06:30.529 --> 00:06:33.610
week for 24 hours, but came back after I asked

00:06:33.610 --> 00:06:35.490
a few people at the BBC whether that was a permanent

00:06:35.490 --> 00:06:38.470
change. I also discovered that Apple Music lets

00:06:38.470 --> 00:06:42.789
you listen to radio without a subscription. So

00:06:42.789 --> 00:06:45.269
that's a nice thing. Anyway, I link to how to

00:06:45.269 --> 00:06:48.170
listen to BBC Radio outside the UK from the show

00:06:48.170 --> 00:06:50.149
notes. Still no on -demand radio in the app,

00:06:50.170 --> 00:06:52.430
by the way. It's been on the web for a few months

00:06:52.430 --> 00:06:54.089
now. I'm sure that they know what they're doing.

00:06:54.649 --> 00:06:56.910
Now, I'm in Sydney from Wednesday afternoon until

00:06:56.910 --> 00:06:59.189
mid -Friday. I'll be spending Thursday at South

00:06:59.189 --> 00:07:02.829
by Southwest Sydney. So my contact details are

00:07:02.829 --> 00:07:05.610
linked. In fact, james .cridland .net slash contact

00:07:05.610 --> 00:07:08.350
is how to get in touch with me. I should mention,

00:07:08.410 --> 00:07:09.949
by the way, if you're listening in the US, I've

00:07:09.949 --> 00:07:12.689
got a new US telephone number to go with my UK

00:07:12.689 --> 00:07:15.490
and Australian one. Yes, you can ring it and

00:07:15.490 --> 00:07:18.670
it'll make this phone on my desk actually ring.

00:07:19.529 --> 00:07:21.709
Astonishing. So you can give that a go if you

00:07:21.709 --> 00:07:24.589
like. Also updated on my personal blog, why you

00:07:24.589 --> 00:07:27.750
probably don't need a VPN, why you should cover

00:07:27.750 --> 00:07:30.089
up your barcode on your airline boarding pass.

00:07:30.350 --> 00:07:34.470
No, really. how to avoid showing some short codes

00:07:34.470 --> 00:07:36.970
in Hugo's RSS output, which I'm sure that you'll

00:07:36.970 --> 00:07:39.350
find thrilling. Where am I speaking next? Radio

00:07:39.350 --> 00:07:43.629
Days Europe in Riga, in Latvia, in March 2026,

00:07:43.889 --> 00:07:47.430
radiodayseurope .com for more information on

00:07:47.430 --> 00:07:50.649
that. Very much looking forward to doing that.

00:07:50.750 --> 00:07:53.850
And thank you to my many supporters, including

00:07:53.850 --> 00:07:57.550
Wade Kingsley, creative coach, who I've already

00:07:57.550 --> 00:08:01.800
mentioned in this podcast already. but you can't

00:08:01.800 --> 00:08:05.240
guess where. Also, Media Realm, thank you, and

00:08:05.240 --> 00:08:09.680
Media Results as well, as well as Greg Strassel,

00:08:09.720 --> 00:08:11.939
Sam Phelps, Richard Hilton, Emma Gibbs, Jocelyn

00:08:11.939 --> 00:08:14.220
Abbey, and James Masterton. Thank you all for

00:08:14.220 --> 00:08:15.980
being regular supporters. If you would like to

00:08:15.980 --> 00:08:18.379
support my work in any way, please do. You can

00:08:18.379 --> 00:08:21.399
buy me a coffee at buymeacoffee .com slash James

00:08:21.399 --> 00:08:24.680
Cridland, or there's plenty other ways of doing

00:08:24.680 --> 00:08:28.759
that in my show notes. Blue Sky as james .crid

00:08:28.759 --> 00:08:32.919
.land, Mastodon, james at bne .social. And I've

00:08:32.919 --> 00:08:36.139
got a website as well, hooray, about who I am

00:08:36.139 --> 00:08:37.960
and what I do and whether I can help you further.

00:08:38.080 --> 00:08:41.399
You'll find that at james .crid .land. Oh yes,

00:08:41.440 --> 00:08:43.879
that works now. So that's a nice thing. Anyway,

00:08:43.960 --> 00:08:45.820
until next time, keep listening.
