1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:07,000 You are listening to No PC Allowed, aka No Political Correctness Allowed, and I am Mack Iverson. 2 00:00:07,000 --> 00:00:12,000 It is widely known that liberals can't debate their way out of a wet paper bag. 3 00:00:12,000 --> 00:00:18,000 No surprise, all you have to do is look at the last Vice President Brandon Trump debate. 4 00:00:18,000 --> 00:00:23,000 Most liberals aren't smart. That isn't their talent. It's not in their wheelhouse. 5 00:00:23,000 --> 00:00:26,000 Their talent is mainly four things. 6 00:00:26,000 --> 00:00:37,000 As a general rule, they are, number one, emotional, two, sociable, three, greedy and self-centered, and four, egomaniacal. 7 00:00:37,000 --> 00:00:46,000 Those are their most obvious traits to me. All four are also pejoratives, with the possible exception of trait number two, they being sociable. 8 00:00:46,000 --> 00:00:51,000 But I can turn that into a quick negative by saying they are herd followers. 9 00:00:51,000 --> 00:01:04,000 Again, these are general rules only. All this translates into them not having rigorous minds, strong enough to sustain them in even a casual debate with even a semi-competent conservative opponent. 10 00:01:04,000 --> 00:01:14,000 In the following moments, I will show why these deadly to success character flaws of most liberals has led to their stellar success politically and socially, 11 00:01:14,000 --> 00:01:26,000 but because these are fatal flaws, why that same shooting star is now on its rapid descendancy and about to evaporate into the breathtaking atmosphere of conservative reality. 12 00:01:26,000 --> 00:01:31,000 Going back to trait number one, liberals are emotional. Why that connection? 13 00:01:31,000 --> 00:01:36,000 People who lead with emotions, typically women more than men, don't use their minds quite as much. 14 00:01:36,000 --> 00:01:44,000 I'm not saying that's bad necessarily. People who live in their heads too much can learn a whole new way of being by living more emotionally. 15 00:01:44,000 --> 00:01:52,000 But the reverse is also true, and living mentally and rationally can be far more liberating if you live in a complex world as we do. 16 00:01:52,000 --> 00:02:05,000 In America today, flitting from emotion to emotion can even destroy you through alcohol and drug dependency if you don't have at least a healthy religious outlook of some kind to rely on when times get tough. 17 00:02:05,000 --> 00:02:10,000 Liberalism often eschews the religious, especially Christianity. 18 00:02:10,000 --> 00:02:16,000 So if you don't have that bulwark to help you in life, you won't be able to relate to Christian conservatism. 19 00:02:16,000 --> 00:02:25,000 But liberals will accept you with open arms. It also helps the liberal cause that you're not too bright. 20 00:02:25,000 --> 00:02:39,000 If you question things too much, that exposes their liberal agenda, which is primarily motivated not by sincere liberal beliefs, but by the acquirement of big, easy, dirty money for the bigger players. 21 00:02:39,000 --> 00:02:53,000 And so if emotional simpletons at the bottom of the liberal corporate structure pyramid question motivations of the deep state too much, they will start to get wise as to what's really going on. 22 00:02:53,000 --> 00:03:00,000 And the mafia-controlled liberal agenda don't like wise guys or people who get too big for their britches. 23 00:03:00,000 --> 00:03:11,000 So if you start snooping around asking too many questions and you can't keep your nose clean, you could find yourself, shall we say, on the way out. If you know what I mean. 24 00:03:11,000 --> 00:03:19,000 Isn't that just like the mafia? That is why liberals have been manufactured by the deep state billionaires to be more emotional than logical and rational. 25 00:03:19,000 --> 00:03:23,000 No truth seekers are allowed in the dummy-crat party. 26 00:03:23,000 --> 00:03:29,000 Treat number two. Liberals are sociable. Or to put it more succinctly, liberals are herding animals. 27 00:03:29,000 --> 00:03:33,000 Why that connection? It's in the same vein as being emotional. 28 00:03:33,000 --> 00:03:40,000 Touchy-feely people like the feel-good emotions that comes from hanging out with others. 29 00:03:40,000 --> 00:03:46,000 People who feel happiest with others are the ones who will do whatever it takes to get along with others. 30 00:03:46,000 --> 00:03:53,000 They will sacrifice a lot of themselves for the sake of those feel-good relationships. 31 00:03:53,000 --> 00:03:58,000 And because of this, they tend to not want to rock the boat that might threaten those relationships. 32 00:03:58,000 --> 00:04:08,000 So if anything controversial in a friend's life suddenly surfaces, they tend to want to blow it off, if and only if bringing attention to it may sever that friendship. 33 00:04:08,000 --> 00:04:16,000 Therefore, these highly sociable types are much more inclined to gravitate toward a life philosophy that is greatly accepting of people's differences. 34 00:04:16,000 --> 00:04:20,000 Do you know someone who is dangerously pathologically different? 35 00:04:20,000 --> 00:04:28,000 The liberals' view is best not to rub them the wrong way because after all, they are people too, and anyone can love and accept anyone else. 36 00:04:28,000 --> 00:04:37,000 So it's not their friend's welfare or health that matters so much as the maintaining of that friendship, almost no matter how dysfunctional it may become. 37 00:04:37,000 --> 00:04:39,000 This is where codependency comes from. 38 00:04:39,000 --> 00:04:50,000 Politically, this translates as, all are accepted, which is a clarion call codification for, it's okay to debase American culture because love is love. 39 00:04:50,000 --> 00:04:53,000 Cue the harp and violins. Barf-Ola. 40 00:04:53,000 --> 00:04:56,000 Trait number three, liberals are greedy and self-centered. 41 00:04:56,000 --> 00:05:06,000 But wait a cotton-picking second there, boy. How does that jive with them being socially heard like animals? You can't be sociable and greedy and self-centered. 42 00:05:06,000 --> 00:05:14,000 People are obviously multi-faceted, and those traits don't clash. They complement each other, like peanut butter and chocolate. 43 00:05:14,000 --> 00:05:20,000 Have you ever heard of a cutthroat entrepreneur who wasn't sociable? They all are. 44 00:05:20,000 --> 00:05:24,000 Now, they may not be sincere, but that doesn't alter their behavior. 45 00:05:24,000 --> 00:05:31,000 Sure, they're in it for themselves, but greedy Machiavellian types need to use people for their benefit to get ahead. 46 00:05:31,000 --> 00:05:37,000 What better way to use people than to butter them up in social settings, to boost their egos in front of others? 47 00:05:37,000 --> 00:05:41,000 Think about the greediest, most self-centered people you know of. Who are they? 48 00:05:41,000 --> 00:05:50,000 I tend to think of Klaus Schwab, or Bill Gates from the Gates of Hell, or Mark Zuckerbuck, or that infamous lunatic George Soros. 49 00:05:50,000 --> 00:05:56,000 I think of gangsters like Al Capone or the LGBT WTF crowd, those flaming wacko narcissists, 50 00:05:56,000 --> 00:06:03,000 or those who run child sex rings, or child molesters, or narco terrorists, or the majority of the world's billionaires. 51 00:06:03,000 --> 00:06:06,000 Where do all these nuts fit on the political spectrum? 52 00:06:06,000 --> 00:06:12,000 Every single one of them supports far-left liberal causes. 53 00:06:12,000 --> 00:06:21,000 And their very best clients, no matter their profession, are soft-touch, dysfunctional liberal types who are also greedy for fast and easy results. 54 00:06:21,000 --> 00:06:24,000 It's the greedy feeding off the greedy. 55 00:06:24,000 --> 00:06:27,000 Being liberal means being greedy. 56 00:06:27,000 --> 00:06:30,000 Trait number four, liberals are egomaniacal. 57 00:06:30,000 --> 00:06:34,000 Certainly not all, but a huge percentage are. They lack humility. 58 00:06:34,000 --> 00:06:40,000 Why that connection? People with big egos tend not to think too clearly. 59 00:06:40,000 --> 00:06:47,000 Everything they see is filtered through their hyperinflated sense of self-importance, so they can't look at life objectively. 60 00:06:47,000 --> 00:06:53,000 Vice President Brennan is a picture-perfect example of this, so is Cami the Commie and Timmy the Tampon. 61 00:06:53,000 --> 00:06:57,000 Everyone is selfish. Capitalism wouldn't work as well as it does otherwise. 62 00:06:57,000 --> 00:07:00,000 But this is selfishness squared. 63 00:07:00,000 --> 00:07:04,000 It is egomania, just to use one small example. 64 00:07:04,000 --> 00:07:07,000 Hollyweird is a big part of it. So are the super wealthy. 65 00:07:07,000 --> 00:07:14,000 If a billionaire wants to meet a huge celebrity, all they have to do is get involved with some charity and meet them face-to-face. 66 00:07:14,000 --> 00:07:21,000 He tells all his friends, and the famous actor tells all his friends, that he met one of the richest men on Earth, 67 00:07:21,000 --> 00:07:24,000 and that he's a huge fan of that famous actor. 68 00:07:24,000 --> 00:07:26,000 Both men know a lot of people. 69 00:07:26,000 --> 00:07:28,000 You've heard of that movie, Six Degrees of Separation? 70 00:07:28,000 --> 00:07:34,000 The idea is that we are only six relationships away from knowing one semi-famous person on Earth, like Kevin Bacon. 71 00:07:34,000 --> 00:07:37,000 This is where the exponential numbers come into play. 72 00:07:37,000 --> 00:07:39,000 The connections start to spread like wildfire. 73 00:07:39,000 --> 00:07:44,000 Now the super wealthy and the super famous become perfectly interwoven. 74 00:07:44,000 --> 00:07:45,000 What do both have in common? 75 00:07:45,000 --> 00:07:48,000 Both groups are chock-full of massive egos. 76 00:07:48,000 --> 00:07:57,000 These two industries of showbiz and big business now become the perfect intersectioning of selfish money with selfish fame. 77 00:07:57,000 --> 00:08:04,000 That makes for an incredibly vast, strong, and resilient spider's web of influence over the relatively powerless. 78 00:08:04,000 --> 00:08:06,000 Just regular blue and white collar folks. 79 00:08:06,000 --> 00:08:10,000 So now the powerless wannabes are jealous. 80 00:08:10,000 --> 00:08:12,000 And so they imitate the rich and powerful. 81 00:08:12,000 --> 00:08:16,000 And Hollyweird, because it's full of sensitive artists. 82 00:08:16,000 --> 00:08:21,000 And so it was liberal from day one way back in the 1920s of silent filmmaking. 83 00:08:21,000 --> 00:08:26,000 And liberalism, because it's full of shallow, easy to use and abuse people, starving for fame and riches, 84 00:08:26,000 --> 00:08:31,000 are the perfect easy mark suckers for whatever the rich and powerful want to use and abuse them for. 85 00:08:31,000 --> 00:08:38,000 That's just one small but significant reason why liberals strongly tend toward being egomaniacs. 86 00:08:38,000 --> 00:08:40,000 It's all about them. 87 00:08:40,000 --> 00:08:43,000 All of liberalism is based on a false premise. 88 00:08:43,000 --> 00:08:45,000 People are basically good. 89 00:08:45,000 --> 00:08:47,000 I'm a good person. 90 00:08:47,000 --> 00:08:49,000 And so is my fellow human person. 91 00:08:49,000 --> 00:08:53,000 Christian conservatives don't believe in this ego aggrandizing bullcrap. 92 00:08:53,000 --> 00:08:55,000 Or we shouldn't. Why? 93 00:08:55,000 --> 00:08:57,000 Simple. It's not biblical. 94 00:08:57,000 --> 00:09:00,000 Not all egomania is pejorative. That's the problem. 95 00:09:00,000 --> 00:09:06,000 Because an egomaniacal sense of being good is the back road into the land of egomania. 96 00:09:06,000 --> 00:09:10,000 In the course of doing research, I thought I would look up YouTube and I put in the phrase, 97 00:09:10,000 --> 00:09:15,000 Why are liberals afraid to debate conservatives? Which I figure is a foregone conclusion. 98 00:09:15,000 --> 00:09:21,000 I was a little surprised, not much because it's YouTube, but a little surprised that nothing exists by that title. 99 00:09:21,000 --> 00:09:24,000 But there are several that post the opposite. 100 00:09:24,000 --> 00:09:28,000 For example, Why are conservatives afraid to debate liberals? 101 00:09:28,000 --> 00:09:31,000 And I thought, oh man, this I have got to see. 102 00:09:31,000 --> 00:09:37,000 And what they posted was several out of context sound bites of various conservatives debating leftists. 103 00:09:37,000 --> 00:09:41,000 None of which, by the way, showed the conservatives as looking bad at all. 104 00:09:41,000 --> 00:09:48,000 Not really. The sound bites abruptly ended, and so we really don't get the full picture of what was even being debated. 105 00:09:48,000 --> 00:09:52,000 I was expecting maybe some bullet points as to why liberals are so much better at debate. 106 00:09:52,000 --> 00:09:57,000 But there were no debate points. Just a few very shaky sound bites. 107 00:09:57,000 --> 00:10:00,000 In fact, all those videos were like that. 108 00:10:00,000 --> 00:10:05,000 I finally found a few actual debates. My overall impression of watching these debates was that, on the left, 109 00:10:05,000 --> 00:10:10,000 if you come across as a bully and you make your opponent look personally weak, 110 00:10:10,000 --> 00:10:13,000 then somehow the left-wing bully wins the debate. 111 00:10:13,000 --> 00:10:17,000 And so the whole ordeal comes across as ego-based. Who's smarter? 112 00:10:17,000 --> 00:10:21,000 And you can tell that there's an obsession, especially with the leftists, 113 00:10:21,000 --> 00:10:25,000 that intelligence is by far the most important indicator of who wins. 114 00:10:25,000 --> 00:10:31,000 Which is amazing because my whole thing is that leftists or liberals are very unintelligent people. 115 00:10:31,000 --> 00:10:37,000 But it goes back to their beliefs in evolution, that smarter people are somehow more highly evolved 116 00:10:37,000 --> 00:10:40,000 and therefore better than conservatives. 117 00:10:40,000 --> 00:10:46,000 And our side doesn't really believe in evolution too much because it's not biblical, nor has it been scientifically proven. 118 00:10:46,000 --> 00:10:52,000 And you know what's really funny about these debates, too, is that the so-called conservatives that they're debating 119 00:10:52,000 --> 00:10:58,000 are very heady. Not intellectual, but heady. Which is emotion and ego-obsessed, too. 120 00:10:58,000 --> 00:11:01,000 They're very similar to those on the left that they're debating with. 121 00:11:01,000 --> 00:11:07,000 Both sides like to kind of nitpick. You can tell both are kind of like in a pissing contest. 122 00:11:07,000 --> 00:11:11,000 But that's not the way to debate. You're not supposed to do that. 123 00:11:11,000 --> 00:11:17,000 You're supposed to not come from your head so much, but understand the principles of life that are based on truth, 124 00:11:17,000 --> 00:11:22,000 which is based on the Holy Bible. And the left doesn't get that at all. 125 00:11:22,000 --> 00:11:28,000 To try and do matching, urinating contests is a huge mistake. That is the mark of an amateur debater. 126 00:11:28,000 --> 00:11:35,000 And all left-wing or liberal debaters are amateurs. They all are. I've never seen one, not a single one, 127 00:11:35,000 --> 00:11:40,000 who is any good at debating, ever. That's because they are emotional, 128 00:11:40,000 --> 00:11:46,000 herd followers, greedy for attention, and self-centered. And ego-maniacal. 129 00:11:46,000 --> 00:11:51,000 They're also shallow, dishonest, and cruel, and callous to the genuine suffering of others. 130 00:11:51,000 --> 00:11:57,000 Those fatal character flaws hangs them in debates every single time. 131 00:11:57,000 --> 00:12:01,000 Some think that performing nonsensical mental gymnastics is going to impress someone. 132 00:12:01,000 --> 00:12:05,000 But if you're trying to impress someone who has no intention of changing their mind, 133 00:12:05,000 --> 00:12:09,000 then who are you really trying to impress? Just you. You're just gonna butt heads. 134 00:12:09,000 --> 00:12:13,000 And then no one's gonna be convinced. That level of debating is pretty useless. 135 00:12:13,000 --> 00:12:18,000 Again, it's ego and head-based, which is really more emotion-based than intellect. 136 00:12:18,000 --> 00:12:23,000 If you think about it, thinking you're smart is more emotional than rational, 137 00:12:23,000 --> 00:12:29,000 because almost everyone is smart enough. But not everyone displays and develops actually being smart 138 00:12:29,000 --> 00:12:35,000 for any number of personal reasons, mostly due to a deficit of good character traits. 139 00:12:35,000 --> 00:12:40,000 People can think of anything. People can think that they are anything. 140 00:12:40,000 --> 00:12:44,000 And if you read a book, or two books, or three books, or four books, on the same subject, 141 00:12:44,000 --> 00:12:48,000 and they're all disjointed and unrelated, and there's no unifying principle, 142 00:12:48,000 --> 00:12:54,000 then you can get really, really confused. If you read books written by egomaniacs, 143 00:12:54,000 --> 00:12:59,000 you're going to think that's the way to be. But if you read and absorb something 144 00:12:59,000 --> 00:13:04,000 that's entirely devoid of ego, it's only about God. 145 00:13:04,000 --> 00:13:11,000 Then that's something completely different. That's something that most others can't even understand. 146 00:13:11,000 --> 00:13:18,000 Consider this. If one guy reads 50 books on a topic, and his opponent reads only 40 books on that topic, 147 00:13:18,000 --> 00:13:23,000 not only that, but the 50-book guy is also smoother in speech and more persuasive in manner. 148 00:13:23,000 --> 00:13:30,000 And so a debate judge calls him the winner. Does the debate loser prove that by losing that he's wrong on the topic? 149 00:13:30,000 --> 00:13:34,000 Absolutely not. The idea is absurd. Debating is just a show. 150 00:13:34,000 --> 00:13:40,000 You can't decide things on such a superficial, finite show of egos. That's not what life is about. 151 00:13:40,000 --> 00:13:46,000 Truth is objective, not subject to our wishes. It doesn't matter how many books you read. 152 00:13:46,000 --> 00:13:52,000 It matters which book do you read. If the Holy Bible isn't a part of your life, 153 00:13:52,000 --> 00:13:57,000 you're probably going to come across as a major fool, no matter the debate topic. 154 00:13:57,000 --> 00:14:02,000 Now, having said that, I fully understand that the Bible says that the Holy Word of God 155 00:14:02,000 --> 00:14:07,000 just comes across as foolishness to those who don't know God, so we can't really persuade them. 156 00:14:07,000 --> 00:14:12,000 We can try to debate them, but that's only for the benefit of an objective viewer. 157 00:14:12,000 --> 00:14:17,000 You've heard the expression, someone convinced against his will is of the same opinion still. 158 00:14:17,000 --> 00:14:24,000 It's like casting pearls before swine. They're not going to get it because they don't want to get it. 159 00:14:24,000 --> 00:14:30,000 Liberals are all about tribalism these days. It's no longer that sacred slogan on a coins and currency 160 00:14:30,000 --> 00:14:36,000 that proudly states, e pluribus unum, or out of many one. Now it's completely flipped. Out of one many. 161 00:14:36,000 --> 00:14:42,000 The deep state has chopped and diced and pureed this once great nation into a third world hell hole. 162 00:14:42,000 --> 00:14:48,000 Liberals are obsessed with all their separated partisan tribes winning at any and all cost. 163 00:14:48,000 --> 00:14:53,000 They have to win arguments by hook or crook. It doesn't matter if it's based on any kind of truth at all. 164 00:14:53,000 --> 00:14:59,000 If they admit to losing a debate against conservatives, they will have to face the incredible guilt of cognitive dissonance. 165 00:14:59,000 --> 00:15:05,000 That's that psychological defense mechanism that kicks in when one realizes that they've been believing a lie 166 00:15:05,000 --> 00:15:11,000 and living a lie perhaps all of their lives. And it would make them incredibly deeply depressed 167 00:15:11,000 --> 00:15:17,000 if they manned up to it but they can't handle that. So they feel they must keep up this charade of believing 168 00:15:17,000 --> 00:15:22,000 in silly, infantile, and mentally ill liberal causes for the rest of their lives. 169 00:15:22,000 --> 00:15:27,000 I can't find one video on YouTube that says conservatives are better debaters than liberals. 170 00:15:27,000 --> 00:15:32,000 Out of tons of videos, not one. Which is just crazy, dishonest, blatant censorship by Google. 171 00:15:32,000 --> 00:15:38,000 Liberals really suck at debating and we all know it. That's a real weakness on their side. 172 00:15:38,000 --> 00:15:43,000 And that's why YouTube has to censor that topic so much. It's all about controlling the perceptions 173 00:15:43,000 --> 00:15:49,000 of their more naive viewers for political power. Deep state politicians must ensure continued power 174 00:15:49,000 --> 00:15:55,000 by threatening companies like Google and YouTube with severe regulations if they don't greatly censor conservative opinions. 175 00:15:55,000 --> 00:16:01,000 It's as simple as that. I was watching this deep state stooge. I won't mention his name because he deserves no credit 176 00:16:01,000 --> 00:16:08,000 except for he being able to make me laugh at him. But he was a former talk show host on Air America 177 00:16:08,000 --> 00:16:13,000 that was controlled by liberals, a network that tried to compete with Rush Limbaugh and failed miserably. 178 00:16:13,000 --> 00:16:18,000 Anyway, he was tearing into Dennis Prager saying how he could easily defeat him in a debate. 179 00:16:18,000 --> 00:16:26,000 So he called into Prager on this guy's podcast and Prager was fair and calm balanced and Dennis just made this guy look stupid. 180 00:16:26,000 --> 00:16:31,000 He was on for three segments and this liberal just looked like a fool. And at the end of the call 181 00:16:31,000 --> 00:16:36,000 instead of being haughty and arrogant like he was before, he just kind of whimpered out and that was it. Amazing. 182 00:16:36,000 --> 00:16:43,000 And these libtards have the temerity to brag about their fake debating skills. They aren't master debaters. 183 00:16:43,000 --> 00:16:49,000 They're master haters of God's truth and they prove that every time they open their yaps. 184 00:16:49,000 --> 00:16:55,000 Here's another little secret. You can take a competent high school debater, I'm tempted to say even middle school debater 185 00:16:55,000 --> 00:17:04,000 to go up against a multiple PhD Ivy League debater with PhDs in persuasion and logic and with many years of experience. 186 00:17:04,000 --> 00:17:12,000 And that high schooler will destroy that over-educated idiot. And all because the high schooler is on the right side of the issue. 187 00:17:12,000 --> 00:17:19,000 In formal debate competitions, the opposite is true. Most debaters go on to become lawyers so the whole truth thing has nothing to do with debating. 188 00:17:19,000 --> 00:17:24,000 But for the rest of us, debating within the context of objective reality is everything. 189 00:17:24,000 --> 00:17:32,000 So here's the little secret as to why liberals can't win debates. Liberals are wrong on every single issue. 190 00:17:32,000 --> 00:17:39,000 That's why the kid can out debate the air quotes, master debater, every single time. 191 00:17:39,000 --> 00:17:46,000 If the arguments are built on a rotten foundation, that house of cards will not stand. Every debate judge should know this. 192 00:17:46,000 --> 00:17:50,000 But alas, most don't. Here's the bottom line. 193 00:17:50,000 --> 00:17:56,000 Watching these so-called debates, it reminds me of just why libtards salivate over open borders so much. 194 00:17:56,000 --> 00:18:02,000 There are tons of unfunny late night comics and podcasters masquerading as serious pundits. 195 00:18:02,000 --> 00:18:09,000 They need millions of mentally and morally subpar citizens coming into America who will watch them for political reasons mostly. 196 00:18:09,000 --> 00:18:17,000 If their current audience starts to get wise as to just how badly they've had their futures ripped off from them by these deep state Nazis, 197 00:18:17,000 --> 00:18:20,000 then these pundits will lose market share and even lose their jobs. 198 00:18:20,000 --> 00:18:26,000 The deep state media is now firing thousands of air quotes journalists because no one's watching their bull crap anymore. 199 00:18:26,000 --> 00:18:33,000 So they need low IQ losers streaming like ants across the border to fill their otherwise soon to be empty seats on their late night TV talk shows 200 00:18:33,000 --> 00:18:39,000 because they're afraid too many native born Americans will finally wake up and abandon all their liberal BS. 201 00:18:39,000 --> 00:18:45,000 So everything is the reverse mirror image of what they claim. Liberals don't care about the forgotten man at all. 202 00:18:45,000 --> 00:18:51,000 They don't care about justice. Politicians want to use and abuse their weak and stupid voters for personal advantage. 203 00:18:51,000 --> 00:18:56,000 They are cold, calculating and cruel through their actions, not their lying words. 204 00:18:56,000 --> 00:19:02,000 Liberals are liars. They're liars. They all are. 205 00:19:02,000 --> 00:19:09,000 Sure, you've got the useful idiot true believers, but they're just the necessary cogs in the big money machinery of global corruption. 206 00:19:09,000 --> 00:19:17,000 Liberal debaters play so dirty. It's so obvious. The deep state plays dirty. So of course their defenders must also play dirty. 207 00:19:17,000 --> 00:19:21,000 Their side is better off if they choose to not debate us at all. 208 00:19:21,000 --> 00:19:26,000 Their greater success is in not enabling us to even have an audience. 209 00:19:26,000 --> 00:19:33,000 Action step. Let this be a lesson to you. Now that you know you can't lose in a direct honest debate with a liberal, 210 00:19:33,000 --> 00:19:39,000 do not be timid about engaging with them. Those opportunities present themselves constantly. 211 00:19:39,000 --> 00:19:42,000 You don't even have to know them. Talk to strangers just for fun. 212 00:19:42,000 --> 00:19:47,000 And don't let dirty tricks or personal attacks or them changing the subject throw you off. 213 00:19:47,000 --> 00:19:53,000 One of the best things you can do is simply ask them questions or give them enough rope to hang themselves. 214 00:19:53,000 --> 00:19:56,000 At the very least, it will be a learning experience. 215 00:19:56,000 --> 00:20:03,000 You've been listening to No PC Allowed. I am Mac Iverson. We will meet again next week and every week.