You are listening to No PC Allowed, AKA No Political Correctness Allowed, and I am Mac
Iverson.
What is going on with social media censorship?
We need to hammer down on just how wrong this is on every level, even the most superficial
level of understanding, because being super superficial is what being politically correct
or woke is all about.
How anyone can justify censoring anything politically incorrect is mind-blowing.
Elon Musk's acquisition of Twitter was due to his expressed desire to allow for free
speech.
It was terrible, with the shadow banning and the deplatforming and X is supposed to be
better and we thought it was better, but it's not better.
I was viciously shadow banned when I first started podcasting on Twitter several months.
All I said was, well I guess I can't say it because I'll get shadow banned again, but
it had something to do with the Chinese.
Now if you've noticed something about President Trump, Trump talks about how China is doing
some really, really bad things.
And characteristic of his mode of communication is that he never says Chinese, he almost never
says Chinese, he says China, China, not Chinese.
And he does that for the reason of not offending overly sensitive Chinese people.
When he obviously means to attack communist fascist China, in more normal times, people,
when describing their enemies, normally don't contort themselves into pretzels trying to
avoid saying the problem is with the Germans, for example, right?
Today, that of course would be a problem too because everybody's so damn PC sensitive.
But back in World War II, we didn't say the problem was with the Nazi party, for example,
we would always say the Nazis.
The average American did not say we are at war with the Nazi party, we're at war with
the Nazis, of course.
We automatically personalized it because certain people, real live people, were to blame for
World War II.
It's called holding the evildoers, or real people in other words, accountable, which
is good.
Accountability, transparency, and responsibility are very good things.
But in a woke culture like America is today, all this good goes completely out the window.
Now being good is about process.
People don't need to be held accountable for acting bad, now it's society's fault if the
social system isn't perfectly fair to everyone.
Now it's stupid, stunted, institutionalized immaturity, or a grievance culture made permanent.
That's the exact opposite of 1940s America.
Back then, sometimes we would say the problem was with Germany, but a lot of times we would
say the problem was with the Germans.
We would sometimes say we're trying to defeat Germany, but more often than not, if you ever
looked at any of those World War II movies made during World War II, we didn't say we
need to defeat Germany.
We need to defeat the Germans, or the Nazis, and that's not a big deal.
In those days, obviously not a problem because we didn't have political correctness back
then.
We did not trivialize evil, not nearly to the degree that we do now.
During World War II, Americans made sure that awareness of evil, of the Nazis, was front
and center, and we were a strong nation because of it.
What I said several months ago was that the Chinese Communist fascists are a problem,
but at that time, I didn't put Communist fascists between Chinese and the pejorative that I
used afterwards.
I'll just say what it was I said.
I called them a-holes.
That became a problem with the censors, so X censored me because of just that.
So the a-holes are now at X, it's not just China or the Chinese.
Now many of the a-holes work at X.
They are woke-holes because they are thumping their chest, pretending to be holier than
thou.
But I'm being real in my anger, which is justifiable.
The things I talk about often have to do with, and I'll say it, the Chinese abuse of, for
example, Hong Kong residents, which is obviously not anti-Chinese, because I'm talking about
Chinese who are being abused by other Chinese, specifically Communist fascist Chinese, or
China, if you will, if that makes you feel better.
I also often talk about how the Chinese in Shanghai were being abused a couple of years
ago with the brutal lockdowns over some stupid COVID fantasy that somehow the entire world
would be destroyed if China didn't have these prolonged lockdowns in Shanghai.
So I talk about the horrors of the abuse coming from China and the abused being the Chinese.
And my supporting of the Chinese people against these Chinese government despots is somehow
something that needs to be censored.
How stupid, blind, and evil is that notion?
Artificial intelligence censors really screw things up because they don't get logic yet,
at all.
Therefore, the human censors who program AI are as dense as the AI that they program.
The nut doesn't fall far from the tree.
In this case, the nut and the tree are one and the same.
The major problem that America has now is that Americans don't automatically spout
off in angry response to these holier than thou woke-hole types who think they're actually
doing the world a favor by saying you can't engage in hateful behavior or conduct.
That's what X accused Mia.
They say hateful conduct, really because speech is protected through the First Amendment.
So they feel too uncomfortable saying that what I said was hate speech.
So they lobbed the label of hateful conduct at me instead.
But what's the damn difference?
So it's obviously all just crazy stupid semantics.
PC is all about fake posturing to try and force themselves into only appearing to look
virtuous to other woke low IQ simpletons like themselves.
So who's censoring?
It could just be one purple-haired woke-hole working at X.
A few weeks ago I did a program called June, the month for celebrating woke crapola.
If you haven't heard it, you don't know what you're missing.
It's excellent analysis, but you may have trouble finding it on X.
X loves to bloviate over how they allow freedom of speech, but not freedom of reach.
But what's the damn difference?
If they limit reach, they limit speech.
They use that woke-ified language because they think that you, dear listener, are just
too stupid to figure out that there's no difference at all, obviously between limiting freedom
of speech and limiting freedom of reach.
If you go out and you scream something in the middle of a hurricane so that no one can
hear you, what the hell good is your screaming?
I mean, they really do think you're stupid.
Today, if an American grownup, let's say like me, is being told that I can't say something
by someone else, some authority or otherwise, then my response is always a middle finger
right in the face of the a-hole who tells me I can't say it.
Who the hell says I can't say it?
Who made whomever the arbiter of goodness and decency in the world?
Obviously that person is neither good nor decent, otherwise he wouldn't be bullying
this way or trying to tell me what's acceptable and what's not acceptable to say.
By the way, that's obvious bullying.
That should be obvious to every American, that no one can tell you what to say or how
to say it.
It's simply your opinion.
Now you could be spot on or you could be completely wrong in your opinion.
That's America and that's okay.
I'm not even saying that everything I say on this podcast is accurate.
A lie is defined as a misstatement of truth or as something that is not objectively true.
People lie all the time.
It's a constant with humanity and that's not intentionally lying, but a lie doesn't
have to be intentional.
It can still be a lie by dictionary definition.
So who the hell do these social media platforms think they are telling me I can say only certain
things or only in a certain way?
I can't say things that sound hateful to them?
Sounding hateful to them sounds like glowing, wholesome, godlike, goosebump inducing holy
truth to me.
I guess it's the godlike part that's so disturbing and threatening to them.
So why are they right and why am I wrong?
I think, I hope, I'm fully and completely demonstrating how absurd the very idea of
any censorship is.
We shouldn't have any censorship.
It's asinine.
It's worse than that.
It's evil.
It serves no good purpose at all.
All it does is bring up the pressure cooker on society.
That's all it does, which is very bad.
And these censorship loving clowns over at X do not know what a steaming pressure cooker
can do to a country.
They have no idea.
If they've ever studied real history, which I'm certain they never have, those censoring
little purple-haired pansy creeps over at X are a bunch of damn confused momma's boys.
If they knew historically what censorship creates, but they have no idea how horrible
war is, they don't care.
That war often comes from silencing speech.
If the pressure cooker does not let off enough steam or free speech, then that's going to
create the perfect atmosphere for civil war.
The first American Civil War was absolutely horrible, but the second one could be far,
far worse in its death and destruction.
The violence and the evolution of firearms evolved far beyond traditional battlefield
tactics during the first American Civil War, for example.
If you had a single bullet wound in the armor leg, it was almost guaranteed that you would
lose that limb.
That's how bad the wounds were.
And much of the fighting was very close.
The Battle of Franklin in Tennessee, for example, was vicious hand-to-hand combat with rifles
going off inches away from the soldiers' bodies, creating the most horrific wounds that you
can imagine.
So the amputations that came from the Civil War increased so much more than in previous
wars.
The mind wants to live through another Civil War.
I'll tell you who.
No one who knows anything at all about human history or our very flawed human nature that
so easily turns a blind eye to such needless and profound human suffering.
So why would you throw gasoline on a fire by engaging in any kind of censorship?
X ought to be absolutely ashamed of themselves for censoring me.
Elon Musk, if he's okay with this, is a horrible human being.
If he's not aware of it, then he needs to become aware of it.
No one should be censored for unpopular speech.
That is evil.
I don't care what that speech is.
Being prejudiced or saying things that are actually somewhat funny or politically incorrect
or anti-woke, there is nothing wrong with any of that.
In these oppressive times, it's good.
We should all be engaging in very unpopular speech.
But for a company or a corporation to censor it, it's just evil.
Ironically and comically, too, I might add, social media companies love to complain that
their freedoms are somehow infringed when we users speak up and say things that they
don't like.
They, to be more honest, may threaten their monopolistic business model.
But commentary on social media is not their speech.
It's ours.
Their only real comeback to that is that it's their company, not ours.
So it becomes like this employer-employee type of relationship.
They get to write the rules, but they are not our bosses.
They don't pay us.
We pay them.
If anybody's the boss around here, it's us.
And so when we say jump, their only question should be, how high, sir, that is, if they're
scrambling to get our hard-earned business like any other legitimate business would.
But they don't have to because they're government-supported monopolies, hence their arrogance.
But again, they should defer to us because public speech is sacred, as per our sacred
first amendment.
The only other last straw that they have left is their claim that their company is private
property.
And so they get to call all the shots.
Isn't it curious how these big tech billionaires love socialism, communism, and technocratic
fascism for everybody else, but insist on only free market capitalism and property rights
for themselves?
Is anybody else amused by this?
But their platform is not a physical platform or property.
It is virtual and involves sacred, God-given, not tech-given, protected freedom of speech.
These companies are protected from lawsuits because of Section 230 of the so-called Communications
Decency Act, unlike newspapers that can be sued for libel.
So social media companies have a get-out-of-jail-free card.
Therefore, they should and must allow everything users have to say to be published and without
the threat of we podcasters of ever being shadow banned or deplatformed.
Liberals will cry out that with all this new free speech, division will occur.
But that division has already occurred more so now than ever before in American history.
That division is already there.
And it was created by trillions of dollars invested by the deep state and the choccoms
into the manufactured fake need for social justice.
At least that pressure can now finally be released, but only through 100% uncensored
speech, which is profoundly healthy and necessary in any free society.
Here's the bottom line.
Social media is not like a newspaper.
There are far, far, far, far too many people and opinions involved here.
It's obviously much more like a phone call.
It's outrageously stupid to assume a corporation can control the speech of so many users, all
with wildly disparate personalities and points of views.
And that is what I call, and all of us should call, no shaving cream Sherlock.
Listen, understanding social media censorship is really simple.
Dummycrats and rhinos threaten big tech with regulation if they don't censor podcasters
like me and other social media comments that the deep state doesn't like.
That's how the deep state A holds control, opinions, and stay in power when everyone
hates their guts.
So just how liberal, I mean, really, are these social media companies?
Not at all.
It's all 100% hypocrisy.
They're only in it for the money and the power and the influence, just like the deep state.
And that is exactly how the third world operates.
Action steps number one, contact your representatives.
Tell them under no uncertain terms that you want them to support free speech on all social
media platforms and do it on a regular schedule.
Don't do one and done.
Do it every week, do it every day or every other day.
Just go crazy with free speech.
Use it or lose it.
Number two, please get the word out about no PC allowed.
As you can tell, big tech is really coming down on us hard.
As I said, I was seriously shadow banned recently.
Big tech and the deep state are desperately trying to shut down the truth that threatens
their outrageously profitable business model.
The only way around that is for you to subscribe at no PC allowed spelled A L O U D again at
no PC allowed spelled A L O U D like share, subscribe, like share, subscribe and please
support those platforms which are most likely to support free speech.
Those being rumble, Spotify and leave comments.
I'm looking for reviews and please do it now while it's fresh in your mind.
You've been listening to no PC allowed.
I am Mac Iverson.
We will meet again.
God willing, next week and every week.