You are listening to No PC Allowed, aka No Political Correctness Allowed, and I am Mack
Iverson.
There are thousands of fact checkers in the world.
The vast majority of them are bought off fact chokers.
Why do I say this?
31% of Americans get at least part of their news from Mark Zuckerbuck's Facebook.
It is truly terrifying that so many people can be so deluded as to walk around in a semi-ambulance
military daze and lost in the haze, perhaps forever, in some hidden nook somewhere deep
inside fake book.
I say perhaps forever lost there because the news is supposed to report the news.
It's kind of expected called the news and all.
But fake book doesn't report news, it repeats opinions and paid for lies almost exclusively.
In Matt Palumbo's thoroughly investigated book, Fact Checking the Fact Checkers, How
the Left Hijacked and Weaponized the Fact Checking Industry, he reports that the Washington
Post fact checker Glenn Kessler famously began a running tally of their fact checks during
the Trump administration, eventually claiming that President Trump had made 30,000 plus
false statements during his presidency.
The 30,000 lies figure was perfect for the headlines and also the result of poor reasoning
and methodological trickery.
Illustrating the subjective nature of fact checking, one such example of Trump's supposed
lies included his statement that, my job was made harder by phony witch hunts, by Russia,
Russia, Russia nonsense.
The single true statement and variants of it account for at least 227 of the lies on
their list.
Jokes, sarcasm, and examples of obvious hyperbole also dominate the list and each time they're
counted, they're counted as an additional lie to further the appearance of mass dishonesty.
Uncoincidentally, Kessler decided to stop maintaining a running presidential fact check
database after Biden's first 100 days in office.
Hmm, I wonder why.
He continues, nothing is truly absurd to check as long as it's coming from a Republican.
My favorite fact check of all time came from the Mercury News, which fact checked Trump's
obviously not literal claim that if you stacked up the 1,000 burgers he'd bought to cater
an event at the White House, they'd pile up a mile high.
That produced a headline you can't help but just laugh at.
Fact check, at two inches each, 1,000 burgers would not reach one mile high.
Thank God they cleared that up.
You're so stupid.
Fact checkers have a very checkered past and present.
Easily one in five fact checks have major errors.
Often gross errors, much of it even, has been proven to be mostly made up by the very human
and very fallible checkers.
Oh, by the way, did you know that all these fact check sites are highly biased toward the
left?
No wonder they're full of lies.
In fact, they're not fact checkers so much as fact chokers, choking the life out of the
truth.
According to Palumbo, as of mid-2020, of the 11 Facebook-approved fact checking organizations
for Central and Eastern Europe, eight are funded by Soros.
As is the case for the U.S., these fact checking groups are largely critical of the political
right in those countries.
For nearly the entirety of Central and Eastern Europe, Soros-backed groups have a virtual
monopoly on fact checking.
That the left's biggest political donor sees the fact checkers worth funding is itself
strong evidence of their bias, and there's plenty more where that came from.
Republicans do not trust fact checkers, maybe only 28%.
Democrats are far more gullible, probably due to fact checkers' extreme bias towards
them.
Only 20% find them trustworthy.
British taxpayers fund the BBC, which is all about government censorship.
The CEO of BBC, Spuze, said, just dripping with hubris, explaining complex stories in
pursuit of the truth.
Another show for BBC said that mistruths can cause really serious harm to society.
Society is a euphemism for their deep state corrupted closed system of tyranny.
And so they're setting up undercover accounts using nefarious tricks to announce intimidation,
a social media to track polarization online.
Those are the words they're using, which is PC for all that pesky free speech that tries
to hold corrupt politicized organizations like the BBC accountable for their tricks
and lies, which they engage in constantly.
Otherwise, why are they so desperately trying to cover it all up?
For example, the BBC lied all through the COVID plandemic, grossly exaggerating deaths
and the need for masks and completely ignoring the obvious deadly side effects of the shots.
This from Breitbart, the BBC, which has been undergoing restructuring in order to cut costs
amid threats from the government to end the controversial license fee from the public
is perhaps attempting to prove its value to politicians in Westminster who have repeatedly
expressed a desire to monitor the spread of disinformation on the internet.
Just listen to this transparently fake clap trap from big tech and Soros funded organizations
in cahoots with the UN.
And this is also from Breitbart.
In response to what they brand as online information pollution, which they claim is a global challenge,
the United Nations Development Program, UNDP has launched its Iverify platform to counter
alleged disinformation and hate speech online.
It described the Iverify program as an automated fact checking tool that can be used to identify
false information and prevent and mitigate its spread.
The system will be provided by the UN to national actors who will be given assistance in identifying,
monitoring and responding to threats of information integrity.
So they're talking about an automated fact checking tool, but AI still uses human interpretation.
It's set up by humans and it's interpreted by humans.
So it's still very, very flawed.
They're trying to say, well, uh, yeah, nobody really trusts fact checkers anymore, but this
is a fail safe to make us sound more authoritative and objective.
Well that's nonsense, obviously.
And it goes on.
The automated fact checking tool could have imminent impact on the world with the platform
being actively used in Sierra Leone ahead of the country's general elections.
So of course they want to make sure that it's being used before an election because they
know that it will transform the election from the legitimate winner winning into losing.
They know this of course in advance.
Overt out of the closet criminality is funding all these fake fact checkers.
The George and Alex Soros mafia crime family has funded left wing extremist groups whose
main goal is to derail Bible based Christianity and constitutional democratically elected
republics like the USA worldwide.
He paid $30.3 million to set up these fake fact checkers over just the last four year
period.
How much money does the prime target of Soros or middle class American family, for example,
on average, able to afford to donate to counterbalance these criminal based liars, maybe 10 to $20
for an average donation.
How can that compare with the $30.3 million bribe from basically one self admitted lunatic
struggling with his mental illness like George Soros?
Are you getting why the fake fact checking industry is overwhelmingly leftist in its
bias and has been grossly corrupted by billionaire bribes for many years now?
Are you getting this?
An alum Bokari of Breitbart wrote Facebook notoriously uses fact checkers to dodge responsibility
for censorship, even though its infamous decision to suppress the Hunter Biden laptop story
took place before any third party fact checkers had weighed in.
In court, Facebook has admitted that fact checks, despite their pretense of impartiality
and objectivity are just opinions.
Bingo.
Written in 1996 in the early days of the internet, section 230 of the communications decency
act allowed tremendous freedom of speech and social media.
As soon as president Trump got elected, all that quickly changed.
A social media company may say, you can say almost anything you want.
But if it violates their community standards, a sickeningly transparent euphemism, then
you can get zined with disinformation labels and eventually deplatformed permanently just
for expressing first amendment, guaranteed opinions, or even actual facts that runs counter
to what the big tech mafia wants you to say.
If your stone cold, hardcore proven facts don't jive with the mafia controlled social
media's opinions, then those liars call you a liar for highlighting their systemic lack
of integrity.
Welcome to the Orwellian brave new world of near perfected gaslighting.
Fact chokers are for profit.
Even the so-called nonprofits are controlled by big money.
In 2020, even the overtly for-profit fact chokers called news guard received $750,000
from the Department of Defense.
These taxpayer raped dollars are continuing to grow for the exclusive purpose of exploding
deep state growth to an obscene degree.
Their goal is to reduce viewership of their political enemies, which are people like me
and I assume you.
Their goal, like all things deep state, is to cause normal well adjusted people serious
financial harm.
If you're not on the dole, if you're not a loser who quickly grabs the ankles for whatever
the deep state wishes, then they can't use you.
And so you're no good to them.
Therefore, you must be eliminated in any and every way possible by hook or by crook.
That's what every single mafia family does.
That is also why fact chokers are so uniform in the corruption.
They have to have a unified narrative that's as airtight as possible to prevent skepticism.
And it's a good thing for them that there are plenty of university educated useful idiots
out there to run interference by believing in most all of the fact chokers' proven intentional
lies.
Under the news of fake news websites, bought off Wikipedia says that the Western Journal
published anti-immigrant stories about the Central American migrant caravans.
Well I'm loudly anti-immigration.
Does that classify me as having fake opinions?
So if you toe the line and act like a good little German, then you won't get condemned
by Wikipedia?
Oh well, who cares?
They have plenty of fake and flawed information on their site.
A glaring example of their Marxist bias is that they label Alex Jones Infowars a quote
hate group.
And I'm reading straight from Wikipedia here.
Alex Jones has claimed that millions of people have voted illegal in the 2016 presidential
election.
Well if he said that, he might be wrong, but millions of votes absolutely were, at the
very least, fake votes in the 2020 election with Trump winning in a landslide.
And that doesn't have anything to do with hate.
Letting those arrowheads over at Wikipedia define terms for us was our biggest mistake.
Fact chokers run interference for deep state shenanigans like widespread election fraud.
This isn't based on ignorance, this is intentional election fraud encouraged by fact chokers.
Because as I said, these chokers are tied to the deep state mafia's chain of deceit.
All you have to do is follow the money.
Jay Sekulow's judicial watch legal team was also labeled as a fake news group.
Not one leftist group is impugned as fake news as far as I can tell.
Almost anything left wing is fine and dandy, but tons of conservative information groups,
hundreds of them, are labeled as fake.
Why?
Because Marxist liars hate any kind of real truth.
Wikipedia is audaciously, out of the closet, Marxist in their worldview, and incredibly
dishonest.
Much of Wikipedia's fake information comes from PolitiFact of the very discredited and
blind Pointer Institute, but you won't likely find that truth with any fact choker.
Where does PolitiFact's dirty money come from?
From hard left organizations like AARP, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, fake conservative
Charles Koch of the Koch brothers, Craig Newmark, Google News Initiative, Google News
Lab, and so on.
As long as there's enough university educated useful idiots out there to believe these fake
fact choke websites, the lies will never dry up and wither away like they should.
Why would they?
These are for-profit enterprises.
There's big money in keeping simpletons in mental chains and the rest of us in actual
chains.
That's why they desperately need to bring in illegal aliens by the millions.
And their business model is so simple, just lie about almost everything, or exaggerate,
or take statements out of context, or leave key details out of any fact reporting.
Just as long as the lying billionaires and their puppet masters, the CHICOMs, get their
way, which is the enslavement of the average American.
Nothing else really matters.
Listen, here's their big hidden secret.
They are degrading and besmirching the fact checking industry on purpose.
They're trying to pull the wool over people's eyes now, but eventually they want the world
to be so skeptical and disbelieving of any for-profit authority like fact checkers that
tries to assert a stress relieving expert's conclusion to anything that supports living
freely.
So that the only fact check authority is whatever the state decides to say is true.
If you can't trust capitalist for-profit fact checkers, well then, the only option is to
trust the government.
Trust only the state.
This is a mind-bending trick straight out of Mao Zedong's communist fascist China.
All this has been historically proven to help advance an eventual totalitarian takeover
of the free world.
The strategy has already been war-gamed to take away all of your freedoms.
All that's needed is some time.
The point is to bring the entire objective scientific method into doubt.
If fact-chokers lie all the time, like they do now, and they know that over time they
will be found out to be the frauds that they are, by everyone except their useful idiots.
If everyone in the free world is lying in the same way with the same basic narrative,
who can you believe if you know they're lying?
No one.
So who can you turn to?
The state, because they're not lying capitalists trying to profit off lies.
But that's the biggest lie of all.
The same is true with the CDC and AMA, medical and lawyer organizations.
And that's part of the plan.
If these deep state sponsored lies lead to the utter destruction of the West because
clearly no one can be trusted anymore, then that's good for the deep state mafia.
They win and we lose.
Same thing with catastrophic climate change.
What does that lying a-hole lowlife Gavin Grusam, Grusam Newsom, say all the time?
Follow the science.
Obey the experts.
Science, science, science.
He bold-faced lied about the science through all the COVID plandemic.
About masks.
Shutdowns.
Shot safety.
Everything.
Because his biggest donors told him to.
Same thing with climate change.
They have the burden of proof to show us we're in trouble and they can't do it.
They lie about it being an existential threat.
There is absolutely no science whatsoever behind that claim.
And they call us liars and science deniers.
It's entirely Orwellian.
Mostly accuse others of the evil that you're doing.
Just lie about it.
All.
That's mostly what they do.
So life is not that complicated, people, but it can certainly seem that way if you're ignorant
of a few key principles like from the Bible, for example.
But once you know them, you can see so much more.
And life is not the five million piece jigsaw puzzle that you once thought it was.
Now you've got wisdom, which God freely gives if you but ask for it and be diligent in your
continual seeking of it.
There is disgusting naked bias with these fact checkers, especially with January 6th.
There were anti-Trump activists aggressively storming the Capitol, possibly FBI plants,
and they're reported as not inciting violence.
And the pro-Trumpers were there, they were inciting violence.
It's so naked in its bias.
It's just mind blowing.
Now I'm going to read from Matt Palumbo's book, Fact Checking the Fact Checkers.
The COVID lab leak fact checkers got it dead wrong on the biggest story of 2020.
Never afraid to trust a government at its word, PolitiFact produced eight fact checks
in early 2020 that used or relied on data from the World Health Organization for COVID-19.
Statistics that were proven to be untrue because China had lied about their data.
He continues, not only were all the fact checkers and handpicked experts wrong on a story that
has implications for international relations, they were deputized by big tech to shut up
anyone proving them wrong.
Also from Matt Palumbo's book, at a ceremony for those 13 US troops killed in Kabul during
the botched Afghanistan withdrawal, PolitiFact's Daniel Funke wrongly claimed that Vice President
Brandon had checked his watch once, and it was after the ceremony.
Two gold star fathers, Darren Hoover and Mark Schmitz, who were eyewitnesses at the event,
went on the record stating that they saw Biden repeatedly checking his watch during the ceremony,
which one of them described as the most disrespectful thing he has ever seen.
According to them, it didn't just happen once, but 13 times overall.
A third gold star parent, Shana Chappelle, wrote in a Facebook post, I watched you, Vice
President Brandon, disrespect us all five different times by checking your watch.
But the F was so important that you had to keep looking at your watch.
Eventually, Funke changed his ruling from partly false to missing context because he
knew he had to issue some sort of correction, but was too embarrassed to admit he was 100%
wrong.
Snopes had similarly poor judgment, initially rating the claim a mixture on the basis that
there is no video or photographic evidence to support the claim that Biden checked his
watch 13 times during the ceremony.
They later revised their rating of the claim to true.
Absolutely amazing hubris.
Now you know why I'm so openly disrespectful of Vice President Brandon.
He is scum.
Period.
Also from Matt Palumbo's book, the fact checkers came to the defense of liberal mega billionaire
George Soros, who the media gleefully brands all criticism of as anti-Semitic.
Naturally video of Soros openly discussing his role in aiding the Nazis and Nazi occupied
Hungary as a child makes it much more difficult to brand any criticism of the man as anti-Semitic.
So the fact checkers have stepped in to deny what Soros himself said.
Recalling in his memoir Masquerade, he wrote, I tried to tell the people I called on not
to obey.
He, George said, clearly disappointed that I wouldn't let him work anymore.
He was beginning to enjoy his career as a courier.
It was all a big adventure.
Soros biographer echoed similar sentiments, noting that George had liked the excitement
of being a courier, but he obeyed his father without complaint.
Soros would later cite this experience as a reason for disliking fellow Jews for being
collaborators while exempting himself.
In an interview with 60 Minutes, host Steve Croft asked, My understanding is that you
went out in fact and helped in the confiscation of property from the Jews.
I mean, that sounds like an experience that would send lots of people to the psychiatric
couch for many, many years.
Was it difficult?
Croft continued.
Not, not at all, not at all.
Maybe as a child you don't, you don't see the connection.
But it was a created no, no problem at all.
Soros said emotionlessly.
No feeling of guilt, Croft replied.
No, Soros replied.
When asked how he couldn't sympathize with other Jews being persecuted, Soros sociopathically
replied by noting the humor in how his behavior then is similar to his behavior in finance
and then employed the old just following orders defense.
Well, of course I could be on the other side and I could be the one from whom the thing
is being taken away.
But there was no sense that I shouldn't be there because that was well actually in a
funny way.
It's just like the markets that if I weren't there, of course I wasn't doing it.
But somebody else would, would, would be taking it away anyhow.
And it was the whether I was there or not, I was only a spectator.
The property was being taken away.
So the I had no role in taking away that property.
So I had no sense of guilt.
Reuters explaining that Soros was simply a spectator who felt no guilt over being one
as if aiding and abetting the Nazis is much better.
Snopes also decided to fact check an exaggerated claim that Soros was an SS officer or Nazi
collaborator during World War II, which they rated false because they don't think that
what he did qualifies as being that of a collaborator.
Palumbo concludes, it's ironic that this comes against a backdrop where the threshold
to brand anyone on the political right a Nazi is a single policy disagreement.
The media has branded making the OK symbol with your hand a Nazi symbol, yet draws the
line when you call someone who aided and abetted the Nazis a Nazi.
Fact chokers have screwed up everything on purpose from the Kyle Rittenhouse obvious
self defense case to lying about the Hunter Brandon laptop and the Chai comms connection
to the COVID plandemic to January six and much more lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies,
lies, nothing but lies from the deep state mafia controlled fact chokers action step
only one.
As you can plainly see the fact choke industry is completely worthless, dangerous and dumb.
If I knew one good standalone, I'd tell you these companies are left wing and leftists
are professional liars.
It's all they know how to do.
Therefore listen diligently to this podcast.
No PC allowed and please, please get the word out to everyone.
You know, we have a country to save.
Like share, subscribe, like share, subscribe at no PC allowed.
Spelled A L O U D again at no PC allowed spelled a L O U D.
You've been listening to no PC allowed.
I am Mac Iverson.
We will meet again next week and every week.