1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:13,000
Welcome to the AlbaNerds podcast with your hosts Andy, Don and Dude.

2
00:00:13,000 --> 00:00:20,160
Oh yeah, here we are. It's the AlbaNerds podcast. We're back once again. I'm Dude, I got Andy

3
00:00:20,160 --> 00:00:24,880
and Don with me. Well, gentlemen, it's just so good to see you today. So how you guys

4
00:00:24,880 --> 00:00:25,880
doing?

5
00:00:25,880 --> 00:00:32,480
Good to see you too, buddy. Yeah. So 200th episode for all those who are been with us

6
00:00:32,480 --> 00:00:36,160
this many years even doing the show.

7
00:00:36,160 --> 00:00:37,160
200th.

8
00:00:37,160 --> 00:00:39,400
Yeah. Congratulations, fellas.

9
00:00:39,400 --> 00:00:40,400
Yeah.

10
00:00:40,400 --> 00:00:44,720
Podcasts are funny. Like you do a bunch of episodes, but then you go back to the beginning

11
00:00:44,720 --> 00:00:49,320
and it's cringy. Like, you know, you learn, you learn as you go, like with anything. So

12
00:00:49,320 --> 00:00:53,940
it's just, it's a little weird to have that many out there when what our show is now is

13
00:00:53,940 --> 00:00:58,920
what I feel like our show is. Yeah. It's still a little cringy though. So yeah.

14
00:00:58,920 --> 00:01:04,160
That's true. That's true. I can listen to a show from a month ago and be embarrassed

15
00:01:04,160 --> 00:01:09,240
at what I said. We've got a great show for you today. We're going to talk about three

16
00:01:09,240 --> 00:01:13,000
albums, going to answer a question. We're going to circle back and then talk about what

17
00:01:13,000 --> 00:01:17,080
we learned. And then we're going to spin the wheel of musical destiny to find out what

18
00:01:17,080 --> 00:01:22,080
kind of albums we'll talk about next time. But this week we're celebrating 200 albums.

19
00:01:22,080 --> 00:01:26,440
That's what I'm talking about.

20
00:01:26,440 --> 00:01:32,360
In 2016, two friends decided the best way to connect with other passionate fans of music

21
00:01:32,360 --> 00:01:38,240
and specifically the album format was to produce a podcast. They called that podcast album

22
00:01:38,240 --> 00:01:46,160
nerds. Since then, Andy and dude have released 199 episodes along the way in 2022 beginning

23
00:01:46,160 --> 00:01:53,160
with episode 143. They asked a listener and fellow album nerd Don to join the show. This

24
00:01:53,160 --> 00:01:58,360
is the 200th episode of album nerds to celebrate the occasion. We're taking a look at Rolling

25
00:01:58,360 --> 00:02:04,160
Stone's top 500 albums of all time. This list was originally published in 2003 was

26
00:02:04,160 --> 00:02:10,400
updated in 2013 and again in 2020 to make that list. Rolling Stone tabulated top 50

27
00:02:10,400 --> 00:02:15,880
album lists for more than 300 artists, producers, critics and music industry figures today on

28
00:02:15,880 --> 00:02:21,480
our 200th episode. We are each picking an album from Rolling Stone's top 200, but it

29
00:02:21,480 --> 00:02:25,680
has to be from an artist who has not been reviewed on an episode of the album nerds

30
00:02:25,680 --> 00:02:26,680
podcast.

31
00:02:26,680 --> 00:02:34,120
Clever, huh? That tail you just spun. Yeah, man. I mean, this was harder than I thought

32
00:02:34,120 --> 00:02:39,960
because we've done 200 freaking episodes, many of which we've talked about a multitude

33
00:02:39,960 --> 00:02:45,160
of albums and a lot of them are on this list. Yeah. Yeah. I might say we have pretty good

34
00:02:45,160 --> 00:02:52,160
records. Or you might say that we're trend chasers and Dr. Original at all. But yeah,

35
00:02:52,160 --> 00:02:56,940
some of the stuff that I would have liked to have looked at was Beach Boys Pet Sounds,

36
00:02:56,940 --> 00:03:04,000
but I couldn't. Prince, Purple Rain, which for me may be the number one. Can't, we talked

37
00:03:04,000 --> 00:03:08,460
about Prince. But some of the stuff that I considered was Public Enemy, It Takes a Nation

38
00:03:08,460 --> 00:03:13,760
of Millions to Hold Us Back. I just felt like that discussion for that album needs the right

39
00:03:13,760 --> 00:03:19,400
context, maybe on a hip hop episode or something. I feel like it needs more than just like top

40
00:03:19,400 --> 00:03:25,160
200. There's more to it than that. The Clashland and Calling, we haven't talked about them,

41
00:03:25,160 --> 00:03:28,560
but I'm satisfied with what I came up with. How'd you guys do?

42
00:03:28,560 --> 00:03:32,280
Lot to pick from, lot of interesting stuff. There were a handful of records I hadn't heard

43
00:03:32,280 --> 00:03:37,160
before, which is kind of what I ended up focusing on. But I'll mention a few that I had that

44
00:03:37,160 --> 00:03:41,880
I was considering. I listened to the B-52's self-titled album probably like four or five

45
00:03:41,880 --> 00:03:44,400
times now for different shows and just haven't picked it yet.

46
00:03:44,400 --> 00:03:52,840
Get some surf rock on here eventually. Jay-Z has like three albums in the top 200. Almost

47
00:03:52,840 --> 00:03:57,320
picked, I think the Black Album is my favorite of his, but he has a lot of good stuff. Lauryn

48
00:03:57,320 --> 00:04:00,520
Hill, we got to get her on the show eventually. If I'm listening to Miseducation of Lauryn

49
00:04:00,520 --> 00:04:04,160
Hill, probably like five or six times too. Thought that was going to be the one, man.

50
00:04:04,160 --> 00:04:09,120
Yeah. I really love that record. We'll get to it. And Nine Channels, The Diamond Spiral,

51
00:04:09,120 --> 00:04:12,920
pretty highly ranked on that list as well. Almost picked that. Lots of great stuff. I

52
00:04:12,920 --> 00:04:17,000
mean, it's hard to pick between some of your favorite records and some of the all-time

53
00:04:17,000 --> 00:04:18,000
greats.

54
00:04:18,000 --> 00:04:22,240
Yeah. It was kind of a, it was a frustrating experience for me, you know, that I'd be like,

55
00:04:22,240 --> 00:04:29,280
oh yeah, I love that album and ooh, Neil Young Harvest. So I search it on the website and

56
00:04:29,280 --> 00:04:35,120
it's like, ah, you guys talked about Neil Young record for 20 seconds. But yeah, so

57
00:04:35,120 --> 00:04:40,680
I seriously considered doing the Dusty Springfield record, Dusty in Memphis. I mean, she's somebody

58
00:04:40,680 --> 00:04:46,960
that people cite all the time as being a tremendous talent. So I almost did that record and I'll

59
00:04:46,960 --> 00:04:51,840
probably revisit it in the future. I also spent time with that B-52's record and The

60
00:04:51,840 --> 00:04:56,560
Public Enemy, but yeah, I'm actually quite satisfied with my pick.

61
00:04:56,560 --> 00:04:58,120
All right. Well, let's get to it then.

62
00:04:58,120 --> 00:05:05,560
Can you choo choo choos me?

63
00:05:05,560 --> 00:05:13,400
So, let's welcome the stage of the great big fan of ours, the star of the show, the one

64
00:05:13,400 --> 00:05:16,400
and only Vogue recording star, Otis Redding!

65
00:05:16,400 --> 00:05:22,600
Dude, that's how we should do the intros for our freaking show, man. Get the crowd hyped

66
00:05:22,600 --> 00:05:23,600
a little bit.

67
00:05:23,600 --> 00:05:24,600
Yes, the crowd.

68
00:05:24,600 --> 00:05:32,960
All right. So for my Rolling Stone Top 200 album selection, and we are talking about

69
00:05:32,960 --> 00:05:40,600
Otis Redding and his 1965 album, Otis Blue. Let's play a little bit from the second single.

70
00:05:40,600 --> 00:05:59,600
It says a little bit of, I've been loving you too long.

71
00:05:59,600 --> 00:06:04,600
All right. So this is the third studio album for the singer-songwriter from Dawson, Georgia.

72
00:06:04,600 --> 00:06:14,840
I was hoping it was Dawson's Creek. That would have been really cool.

73
00:06:14,840 --> 00:06:22,160
The record is known for solidifying Mr. Redding as a commercial success. It had a lot of crossover

74
00:06:22,160 --> 00:06:28,280
appeal as it featured a bunch of covers from contemporary artists, including Sam Cooke.

75
00:06:28,280 --> 00:06:33,360
The track we just played is one of the three original Redding pen songs on the record.

76
00:06:33,360 --> 00:06:38,280
So a couple of interesting tidbits. It was largely recorded over a 24-hour period in

77
00:06:38,280 --> 00:06:39,280
1965.

78
00:06:39,280 --> 00:06:40,280
Wow.

79
00:06:40,280 --> 00:06:43,800
Yeah. It was like from like Saturday night to like through Sunday afternoon or something

80
00:06:43,800 --> 00:06:44,800
like that. Crazy.

81
00:06:44,800 --> 00:06:49,400
That's how we should do this. Just recorded the whole year's worth of shows in 24 hours.

82
00:06:49,400 --> 00:06:56,040
Oh, man. That sounds fun. Yeah. So it garnered three singles, which became top 40 hits. We

83
00:06:56,040 --> 00:07:00,840
are going to get to those shortly. Yeah. The three words I used to describe this record

84
00:07:00,840 --> 00:07:06,760
are, can I live inside the record? I just love the feeling of this record. It's just

85
00:07:06,760 --> 00:07:11,960
such a warm, inviting sound. Not only his voice, but just the production and the band.

86
00:07:11,960 --> 00:07:18,160
Everybody just sounds so inviting. I was immediately taken by it. I hadn't heard this before this

87
00:07:18,160 --> 00:07:22,960
week of listening. And I was just immediately struck by how just good it felt to listen

88
00:07:22,960 --> 00:07:23,960
to.

89
00:07:23,960 --> 00:07:29,920
His voice is like, I don't know how to describe it, but so he's being sung by the song as

90
00:07:29,920 --> 00:07:37,080
much as he's singing the song. You can tell that the inspiration is coming as he's going.

91
00:07:37,080 --> 00:07:41,600
I think that's part of what's cool about this era in recorded music, where sometimes you

92
00:07:41,600 --> 00:07:44,640
just go with the flow instead of it being so meticulous.

93
00:07:44,640 --> 00:07:47,840
Yeah. Right. It feels a little more spontaneous, a little more alive.

94
00:07:47,840 --> 00:07:48,840
Yeah. Yeah.

95
00:07:48,840 --> 00:07:52,160
All right. Why don't we play another cut from the record? This is a little bit of, you don't

96
00:07:52,160 --> 00:08:06,560
miss your water.

97
00:08:06,560 --> 00:08:14,080
You Don't Miss Your Water was written and recorded by William Bell in 1961. Like everything

98
00:08:14,080 --> 00:08:20,480
he does, Otis made it his own. I just, I really like that lyric a lot. You know, of course

99
00:08:20,480 --> 00:08:25,680
it's such a cliche to sing about crying, but sing about it in that way. Like you don't

100
00:08:25,680 --> 00:08:30,680
miss your water till your well runs dry. I just think that's, I think that's really cool.

101
00:08:30,680 --> 00:08:33,560
It mostly just made me thirsty. Excuse me.

102
00:08:33,560 --> 00:08:42,500
Okay, buddy. What have you got here? Well, water.

103
00:08:42,500 --> 00:08:47,200
The three words I chose to describe the album are ducky did testify. Right. And so this

104
00:08:47,200 --> 00:08:53,480
is a, that's just a stupid reference to, to the, the 1986 film, Pretty in Pink by John

105
00:08:53,480 --> 00:08:59,120
Hughes in that film, the character ducky is like lip syncing and dancing in the record

106
00:08:59,120 --> 00:09:04,680
store to Otis Redding singing, try a little tenderness, which is not on this album, but

107
00:09:04,680 --> 00:09:08,720
you know, he's like really into it. And you know, that might even be like my first exposure

108
00:09:08,720 --> 00:09:14,840
to Otis Redding. So yeah. So thanks ducky for the, for the reference. Yeah. I mean,

109
00:09:14,840 --> 00:09:18,760
you guys already talked about the vocal talent and I guess, you know, as you said, it's,

110
00:09:18,760 --> 00:09:23,920
it's hard to describe and maybe that's, that's how you know, somebody really is special,

111
00:09:23,920 --> 00:09:27,800
you know, because you can't describe it. He doesn't sound like anybody else. I mean,

112
00:09:27,800 --> 00:09:34,800
it can be somewhat crass or harsh at times, but like in a good way and like under control,

113
00:09:34,800 --> 00:09:39,360
but he also can do the, you know, soft, beautiful sounds. Yeah. I was struck by that too. Like

114
00:09:39,360 --> 00:09:44,800
on the edges, it feels like his voice is very rough and ragged at times. And he's almost

115
00:09:44,800 --> 00:09:49,000
sounds like he's straining, but other times he'll hit a note and just sounds so effortless

116
00:09:49,000 --> 00:09:53,920
and just so pure and beautiful and just perfectly soft and round. And it's a cool, it's a cool

117
00:09:53,920 --> 00:09:59,400
combination man. The voice really is an instrument, you know, I mean you can do, do so much with

118
00:09:59,400 --> 00:10:05,560
it. Plus I think, you know, the, this is almost certainly one or two takes at the most, you

119
00:10:05,560 --> 00:10:12,840
know, for these songs, which like I said earlier, I think is what makes this interesting, especially

120
00:10:12,840 --> 00:10:18,840
when it's a bunch of covers, besides the three originals, the reinterpretation I think comes

121
00:10:18,840 --> 00:10:24,120
easier if you just let it fly. You know, you're not trying to do it a special arrangement

122
00:10:24,120 --> 00:10:30,560
and la la la, you just do the song sometimes without even knowing all the words. Yeah.

123
00:10:30,560 --> 00:10:35,560
Does he mess up some lyrics here or what do you mean? Oh yeah. Yeah. We can get into that

124
00:10:35,560 --> 00:10:40,000
in a minute though. Okay. So yeah. So as you said, there's only three originals on this

125
00:10:40,000 --> 00:10:44,320
album. I do wish there were more cause you know, he obviously is a very talented song

126
00:10:44,320 --> 00:10:48,800
writer, but you know, I'm reminded of people like Ray Charles and Aretha Franklin and Johnny

127
00:10:48,800 --> 00:10:55,240
Cash who, you know, just turn songs into their, into their own. And so he does just a great

128
00:10:55,240 --> 00:10:58,920
job of that. Well, I just think it's funny you mentioned Aretha Franklin who took a song

129
00:10:58,920 --> 00:11:04,520
from this album, Respect, that's his, and she made it her own in the context of it completely

130
00:11:04,520 --> 00:11:11,760
changes and her delivery of showed me some respect when I get home. So just that's really

131
00:11:11,760 --> 00:11:16,800
cool. It was wild hearing like the male side of it. Like all I want is when I come home,

132
00:11:16,800 --> 00:11:20,960
I just want you to treat me well. And yeah, and Aretha like totally flipped on its head,

133
00:11:20,960 --> 00:11:27,180
which is, it's cool. Yeah. I got a make me dinner vibe from his version and make your

134
00:11:27,180 --> 00:11:32,280
own damn dinner vibe from her version. Yeah, exactly. You can kind of see why her version

135
00:11:32,280 --> 00:11:38,040
became the, you know, the one. Okay. Why don't we play a little bit from one of those cover

136
00:11:38,040 --> 00:11:54,720
tracks. This is a little bit of I can't get no satisfaction. Yeah. I mean, so this album

137
00:11:54,720 --> 00:12:00,200
was 1965, right Andy? Yeah. I had to double check that too. When did that song come out?

138
00:12:00,200 --> 00:12:06,920
1965, June 5th, 1965, the Rolling Stones released their recorded version that they wrote Keith

139
00:12:06,920 --> 00:12:12,080
Richards and Mick Jagger. And what I was talking about earlier with the words, I mean, there's

140
00:12:12,080 --> 00:12:16,360
some missing lyrics. There's a bunch of made up, I got the guitar and all that kind of

141
00:12:16,360 --> 00:12:23,240
stuff that apparently according to sources, Wikipedia, Otis Redding claimed that he didn't

142
00:12:23,240 --> 00:12:28,440
know the original lyrics of the song and he made them up as he went. Steve Cropper, who

143
00:12:28,440 --> 00:12:32,560
worked on the session had to write the lyrics down from listening to the Rolling Stones

144
00:12:32,560 --> 00:12:38,240
version because that stuff just wasn't easily available on your interweb. So I think some

145
00:12:38,240 --> 00:12:41,480
of the words were a little wrong. He knew the vibe of the song and just kind of went

146
00:12:41,480 --> 00:12:46,160
with it. And I love it. I mean, I love this version. Ronnie Wood of the Rolling Stones

147
00:12:46,160 --> 00:12:52,080
said that later live performances by the Rolling Stones have been influenced by his interpretation,

148
00:12:52,080 --> 00:12:56,000
by Redding's interpretation. Interesting. Yeah, it gets the feeling of it for sure. I

149
00:12:56,000 --> 00:13:00,760
think the band sounds good. It's a little more desperate. The Rolling Stones version

150
00:13:00,760 --> 00:13:08,040
is a little more like sneering and sort of lewd. And Otis is a little more like, I got

151
00:13:08,040 --> 00:13:13,240
it. I got to have you. There's more urgency and a little more passion.

152
00:13:13,240 --> 00:13:19,480
True. Really does demonstrate the similarities between those two genres, rock and roll and

153
00:13:19,480 --> 00:13:25,200
R&B, or really come from the same place and have the same history. Yeah. Great performances

154
00:13:25,200 --> 00:13:30,920
on here from Booker T and the MGs. I never realized they were kind of his backing band.

155
00:13:30,920 --> 00:13:36,000
Yeah. So yeah, I mean, every time I listened to it, I looked forward to that interpretation

156
00:13:36,000 --> 00:13:41,880
of a super well-known song that no one dare reinterpret now, but he did it like a week

157
00:13:41,880 --> 00:13:49,240
later and it's awesome. Devo did a good job too. I doubt it. So quickly, I'll just, the

158
00:13:49,240 --> 00:13:54,120
three words I used to describe this album were the man can sing. I mean, I already touched

159
00:13:54,120 --> 00:13:58,880
on that point throughout our discussion. Holy crap. I don't know that I've listened to Otis

160
00:13:58,880 --> 00:14:04,320
writing whole albums before and he's awesome. And that's all I have to say about that.

161
00:14:04,320 --> 00:14:09,120
The other thing I'll just mention about this record specifically and part of why I picked

162
00:14:09,120 --> 00:14:13,240
it is it's right in that sweet spot in the mid sixties where record companies started

163
00:14:13,240 --> 00:14:19,040
thinking about selling albums as entire entities and not just singles. And this, along with

164
00:14:19,040 --> 00:14:23,360
a couple of the records from 65 are kind of considered like that first crop of like really

165
00:14:23,360 --> 00:14:28,560
great albums that it came into being and were like marketed as such. So it's a nice place,

166
00:14:28,560 --> 00:14:35,120
nice place to start this episode. And also I'm glad that Rolling Stone saw fit to honor

167
00:14:35,120 --> 00:14:39,720
it by putting on its list. I got to say in the original list, it started at number 73

168
00:14:39,720 --> 00:14:44,280
or 78, I want to say. And now it's, it's fallen all the way back to 178, which feels a little

169
00:14:44,280 --> 00:14:47,800
bit crazy to me, but regardless, still in top 200.

170
00:14:47,800 --> 00:14:52,420
Well, a couple of, you know, decades go by, you've got to add new artists in there too.

171
00:14:52,420 --> 00:14:57,480
You know, music continues, albums keep getting made. So the future is now.

172
00:14:57,480 --> 00:15:00,880
Thanks for holding that pose.

173
00:15:00,880 --> 00:15:10,280
All right. So once again, the record is called Otis Blue by Otis Redding. It's available

174
00:15:10,280 --> 00:15:14,000
on all the usual streaming platforms. Check it out if you haven't heard it. It's an excellent

175
00:15:14,000 --> 00:15:15,000
lesson.

176
00:15:15,000 --> 00:15:19,360
I'm good enough. I'm smart enough and doggone it. People like me.

177
00:15:19,360 --> 00:15:23,440
If you're enjoying the show and we hope you are, do us a solid and leave a review on Apple

178
00:15:23,440 --> 00:15:28,820
podcasts or your favorite podcast app. Maybe we made you laugh. Maybe we made you cry.

179
00:15:28,820 --> 00:15:33,900
Maybe we made you throw your phone across the room or you discovered an album you enjoy.

180
00:15:33,900 --> 00:15:38,000
Leaving a review keeps the show going and helps other music fans find us.

181
00:15:38,000 --> 00:15:39,000
200.

182
00:15:39,000 --> 00:15:40,000
200.

183
00:15:40,000 --> 00:15:41,000
Tyrannosaurus Rex.

184
00:15:41,000 --> 00:15:49,560
Okay. So the album I chose is from a band called T-Rex.

185
00:15:49,560 --> 00:15:50,920
That's short for Tyrannosaurus Rex.

186
00:15:50,920 --> 00:15:56,000
Yes. And we'll get into that in a second. The album is called Electric Warrior, released

187
00:15:56,000 --> 00:16:04,120
in September of 1971. It was number 188 on the 2020 Rolling Stone top 500 list. Let's

188
00:16:04,120 --> 00:16:18,360
hear the song that it's most known for. This is Bang A Gong. Get it on.

189
00:16:18,360 --> 00:16:24,680
I've never understood why this guy wants people to have sex with gongs. It's just totally

190
00:16:24,680 --> 00:16:25,680
weird to me.

191
00:16:25,680 --> 00:16:28,680
Okay. Don't hit till you try, buddy.

192
00:16:28,680 --> 00:16:38,200
I just got to say, so, you know, last week, I was listening to this on headphones while

193
00:16:38,200 --> 00:16:42,920
I was doing some weed whacking and some grass clipping blowing.

194
00:16:42,920 --> 00:16:51,600
And I just could not stop myself from like strutting to this song. Kind of like the Mick

195
00:16:51,600 --> 00:16:52,600
Jagger strut.

196
00:16:52,600 --> 00:17:02,000
I think I actually saw that on YouTube. It said crazy neighbor dancing in yard. Someone

197
00:17:02,000 --> 00:17:03,000
caught you.

198
00:17:03,000 --> 00:17:07,480
So anyway, so that song was originally just known as Get it on. But there's another band

199
00:17:07,480 --> 00:17:11,960
called Chase who had a song called Get it on. So now it's officially Bang A Gong, parentheses

200
00:17:11,960 --> 00:17:17,720
Get it on. Mark Bolan, who's basically the main guy from T-Rex, claimed to have written

201
00:17:17,720 --> 00:17:22,760
the song out of his desire to record Chuck Berry's Little Queenie and said that the riff

202
00:17:22,760 --> 00:17:25,720
was basically taken from that Berry tune.

203
00:17:25,720 --> 00:17:31,040
Song actually features piano from Rick Wakeman, who you might know from the band Yes. Also

204
00:17:31,040 --> 00:17:37,720
saxophone from Ian McDonald of King Crimson. So yeah, T-Rex is an English band formed in

205
00:17:37,720 --> 00:17:44,000
1967 by singer, songwriter and guitarist Mark Bolan. The band was originally called Tyrannosaurus

206
00:17:44,000 --> 00:17:50,560
Rex and had a kind of like a psychedelic folk sound. Kind of reminded me of like Donovan.

207
00:17:50,560 --> 00:17:56,400
So you know, over time, Bolan embraced more like electric sounds. And in 1970, he officially

208
00:17:56,400 --> 00:18:01,560
changed the band's name to T-Rex. Electric Warrior is the second album since the name

209
00:18:01,560 --> 00:18:08,780
changed and there's six overall. So you know, Bolan is basically T-Rex with a rotating cast

210
00:18:08,780 --> 00:18:09,780
of characters.

211
00:18:09,780 --> 00:18:13,920
The three players on the album are Mickey Finn, you know, who did like congos and bongos

212
00:18:13,920 --> 00:18:19,360
and does a lot of the backing vocals you hear. Steve Curry on bass and Bill Legend on drums.

213
00:18:19,360 --> 00:18:25,280
The three words I chose to describe the album, I just said Godfather of Glam. It's always

214
00:18:25,280 --> 00:18:30,520
hard to pinpoint, you know, where things began or who did it first. You know, this album

215
00:18:30,520 --> 00:18:36,440
at least, you know, predates, you know, Bowie's The Rise and Fall of Ziggy Stardust and The

216
00:18:36,440 --> 00:18:41,880
Spiders from Mars. It predates the Roxy Music self-titled debut. You know, this is really

217
00:18:41,880 --> 00:18:47,240
the beginning of glam and probably the first true glam record.

218
00:18:47,240 --> 00:19:03,320
Okay, well, let's hear another track. This is a song called Planet Queen.

219
00:19:03,320 --> 00:19:08,200
So Planet Queen, cool song. Kind of reminds me actually of Donovan's Hurdy Gurdy Man,

220
00:19:08,200 --> 00:19:14,000
which the psychedelic stuff here is definitely on display in that particular track. The lyrics

221
00:19:14,000 --> 00:19:21,400
are poetic and surreal, fantasy. Maybe he's abducted by aliens. He's gonna, I don't know,

222
00:19:21,400 --> 00:19:26,960
make love to the Planet Queen's daughter. I didn't, it was just weird. He just, it's

223
00:19:26,960 --> 00:19:28,720
nonsense for the most part.

224
00:19:28,720 --> 00:19:32,360
Yeah, lyrically I think he's just goofing around a lot.

225
00:19:32,360 --> 00:19:34,840
Yeah, like he's, he's, he's soosing.

226
00:19:34,840 --> 00:19:38,720
He does get pretty clever. You know, like you're built like a car. You've got a hubcap

227
00:19:38,720 --> 00:19:42,280
diamond star halo. I just, I love that line, you know.

228
00:19:42,280 --> 00:19:44,280
Yeah, there's, there's great lines.

229
00:19:44,280 --> 00:19:46,840
It's interesting, but it feels kind of throwaway.

230
00:19:46,840 --> 00:19:53,360
Yeah, I think it's just going with, you know, it's sort of lyrically a concept of space

231
00:19:53,360 --> 00:19:59,560
and then let's go. And then very rhymey. It's very rhymey, which I do like. The three words

232
00:19:59,560 --> 00:20:05,640
I used to describe this album might be what a weirdo, but instead I'm going with Wham

233
00:20:05,640 --> 00:20:10,640
Bam Glam, which is in the same category as what Don said. You know, I think about Bowie

234
00:20:10,640 --> 00:20:17,120
and Wham Bam, Thank You Ma'am and what came after, which I think ultimately was more interesting

235
00:20:17,120 --> 00:20:22,200
because they were more than, those other artists were more than one flavor. T-Rex is kind of

236
00:20:22,200 --> 00:20:27,960
what T-Rex is, but I hear T-Rex in a lot of music today, including King Gizzard and the

237
00:20:27,960 --> 00:20:33,800
Lizard Wizard. Like absolutely this is an influence. There's no doubt. Especially some

238
00:20:33,800 --> 00:20:38,440
of the space stuff they talk about and the way that they do it. I didn't realize it until

239
00:20:38,440 --> 00:20:43,960
I experienced this album over and over again. And I started having little flashes of King

240
00:20:43,960 --> 00:20:46,400
Gizzard. So yeah, fun listen.

241
00:20:46,400 --> 00:20:51,960
Glam rock really dominated the UK charts from like 1972 to 1975. And it didn't really happen

242
00:20:51,960 --> 00:20:56,920
in the United States. There were American glam rock artists, you know, like Lou Reed

243
00:20:56,920 --> 00:21:02,080
and the New York Dolls, the Stooges and stuff like that. But it didn't really have the commercial

244
00:21:02,080 --> 00:21:10,480
success that it did in Britain. Let's hear the opening cut. This is Mambo Sang.

245
00:21:10,480 --> 00:21:24,600
Yeah, I really liked that track in particular. I really, I came to like the whole record.

246
00:21:24,600 --> 00:21:30,360
I like the sound quite a bit. It's sort of strange sounding. I guess that's a little

247
00:21:30,360 --> 00:21:31,360
weird.

248
00:21:31,360 --> 00:21:32,360
It's spacey.

249
00:21:32,360 --> 00:21:35,600
Yeah, spacey. But it feels exciting. It does feel like they're kind of creating something

250
00:21:35,600 --> 00:21:41,680
new as they go, which I love. My three words are a bit wheezy, kind of cheesy, but goes

251
00:21:41,680 --> 00:21:43,040
down plenty easy.

252
00:21:43,040 --> 00:21:46,000
So wheezy, cheesy, easy are your three words if we boil it down.

253
00:21:46,000 --> 00:21:51,240
Yeah, if you want to get specific. So you know, I was saying like he loves the rhymes

254
00:21:51,240 --> 00:21:55,680
in his lyrics here. So to try to incorporate a little inspiration from him here.

255
00:21:55,680 --> 00:21:57,400
Yeah, you nailed it, man.

256
00:21:57,400 --> 00:22:01,960
Yeah, I liked his kind of, I would call his lyrics kind of goofy, a little campy perhaps,

257
00:22:01,960 --> 00:22:07,360
but I think kind of falls in line with where glam rock was headed. But he delivers them

258
00:22:07,360 --> 00:22:15,560
in such like a cool kind of breathy tone that I found like really interesting. And yeah,

259
00:22:15,560 --> 00:22:19,400
I totally agree with the dude. Like, wow, I hear so many bands doing like this style

260
00:22:19,400 --> 00:22:23,960
nowadays. King Gehzard for sure, that band or that artist called King Tough, we've talked

261
00:22:23,960 --> 00:22:28,440
about in the show. Like they sound almost exactly like him at times. Sonically, I think

262
00:22:28,440 --> 00:22:32,960
the record maybe get this little same-sy as it goes on. I didn't feel like there was a

263
00:22:32,960 --> 00:22:37,600
lot of new stuff happening as it played on. The tracks are all short and tight though.

264
00:22:37,600 --> 00:22:42,520
They don't really give a lot of room for exploration, which I watched some of their live performances

265
00:22:42,520 --> 00:22:47,460
from the seventies and they jammed out hard and it was mostly drum and guitar soloing.

266
00:22:47,460 --> 00:22:52,120
So I found that really cool. You don't get that on the record, but it's nice to know

267
00:22:52,120 --> 00:22:55,840
they have that capability. But yeah, I guess you got to talk about his guitars a little

268
00:22:55,840 --> 00:22:59,760
bit. Like he seems like a pretty excellent guitar player. You don't get a lot of soloing

269
00:22:59,760 --> 00:23:04,880
on this record, but it seems like he was pretty adept player, not so much about showing off.

270
00:23:04,880 --> 00:23:09,000
But yeah, I know this was way more bluesy than I expected it to be. I appreciated that.

271
00:23:09,000 --> 00:23:16,320
A couple more thoughts just sonically. I do think there's some tasteful use of strings

272
00:23:16,320 --> 00:23:22,080
in a lot of the tracks, particularly like Cosmic Dancer. Also, the backing vocals, there's

273
00:23:22,080 --> 00:23:29,080
a lot of that ah, just weird sort of goofy stuff that Bowie ended up using a lot. And

274
00:23:29,080 --> 00:23:33,520
then just one final thought, Cosmic Dancer is a song that I was familiar with in the

275
00:23:33,520 --> 00:23:38,120
past. Morrissey actually does a cover of it, but I always liked the line, is it wrong to

276
00:23:38,120 --> 00:23:43,160
understand the fear that dwells inside a man? And it's just in the middle of this weird

277
00:23:43,160 --> 00:23:47,520
song where he's talking about dancing since he was 12, but there's that weird line in

278
00:23:47,520 --> 00:23:52,760
it. That's the line that makes it worth listening to because when it's like, dancing from the

279
00:23:52,760 --> 00:23:56,960
womb, I'm in my tomb. Like, okay.

280
00:23:56,960 --> 00:24:03,160
Yeah, that one nugget of truth in there and makes it all worthwhile.

281
00:24:03,160 --> 00:24:04,160
Yeah.

282
00:24:04,160 --> 00:24:09,520
Okay. Well, it's only 188 on the Rolling Stone list, but I think it belongs in the Album

283
00:24:09,520 --> 00:24:17,760
Nerds Hall of Fame, so I am going to nominate. Yeah, so I think this is a definitive glam

284
00:24:17,760 --> 00:24:24,440
rock album. I think it's an important genre in the history of music. It kind of influenced

285
00:24:24,440 --> 00:24:31,160
punk and metal that came later. All that hair metal we talked about, there's glam in that.

286
00:24:31,160 --> 00:24:36,520
It's produced by Tony Visconti, who is a key figure in this glam rock movement.

287
00:24:36,520 --> 00:24:37,520
Hey.

288
00:24:37,520 --> 00:24:40,880
Yeah, so what do you guys think?

289
00:24:40,880 --> 00:24:45,560
I'm going to say yes. I agree with everything you said. It's a 200th episode. I don't want

290
00:24:45,560 --> 00:24:50,720
to make anyone sad by saying no, but yeah, it's a landmark album. It did pave the way

291
00:24:50,720 --> 00:24:54,480
for a lot of the stuff that's awesome today, and it's a great listen.

292
00:24:54,480 --> 00:24:55,480
Indeed.

293
00:24:55,480 --> 00:25:01,280
Well, as much of a fan of dinosaurs as I am, I like this record. I don't think it's definitive

294
00:25:01,280 --> 00:25:06,200
glam rock record though. I mean, I'm not the most knowledgeable person on glam rock, but

295
00:25:06,200 --> 00:25:12,040
I feel like it's a cool idea, but I don't think the execution is maybe as exciting as

296
00:25:12,040 --> 00:25:13,200
I thought it would be.

297
00:25:13,200 --> 00:25:15,280
You know how many times you've shot us down?

298
00:25:15,280 --> 00:25:16,280
200.

299
00:25:16,280 --> 00:25:20,040
Are you going to triceratop my T-Rex?

300
00:25:20,040 --> 00:25:24,760
Yeah. Stick my horns into your belly.

301
00:25:24,760 --> 00:25:26,800
Stop. Stop.

302
00:25:26,800 --> 00:25:32,200
Yeah, I don't know if it's a definitive record for me. Obviously, a very influential.

303
00:25:32,200 --> 00:25:35,360
That really bangs my gong, Andy.

304
00:25:35,360 --> 00:25:39,200
I don't doubt the influence it's had, but I don't know if it would be the one that I

305
00:25:39,200 --> 00:25:41,560
would pick to represent the genre necessarily.

306
00:25:41,560 --> 00:25:42,560
No one asked you.

307
00:25:42,560 --> 00:25:48,200
Actually. I'm going to say no, but we'll leave it up to the listening audience and see what

308
00:25:48,200 --> 00:25:55,000
they think. Go to our website or our discordalbummates.com to cast your vote. Sorry, John.

309
00:25:55,000 --> 00:26:02,440
Okay. Well, apologies to T-Rex, the electric warrior. Not an Einhoff inductee yet, but

310
00:26:02,440 --> 00:26:04,440
listeners, please save it.

311
00:26:04,440 --> 00:26:11,760
Excuse me. I'd like to ask you a few questions.

312
00:26:11,760 --> 00:26:19,640
Well, it's that fun time on the show where we ask each other a question. At least you

313
00:26:19,640 --> 00:26:26,080
guys have produced 200 of these podcast episodes so far, and we hope people are taking things

314
00:26:26,080 --> 00:26:32,240
away from them. What have you learned or discovered or been turned on to from another podcast?

315
00:26:32,240 --> 00:26:36,480
Yeah, there's so much stuff I've learned from podcasts, man. It feels like it's the new

316
00:26:36,480 --> 00:26:41,120
public education to some degree. I guess all this good information is freely available.

317
00:26:41,120 --> 00:26:42,120
It's your Wikipedia.

318
00:26:42,120 --> 00:26:43,120
Essentially.

319
00:26:43,120 --> 00:26:44,120
Eir-ca-pedia.

320
00:26:44,120 --> 00:26:46,120
Eir-ca-pedia. I'm sure that'll catch on.

321
00:26:46,120 --> 00:26:48,120
Oh man, someone's going to steal that.

322
00:26:48,120 --> 00:26:49,120
Trademark.

323
00:26:49,120 --> 00:26:51,120
Is that all you have to do to say trademark?

324
00:26:51,120 --> 00:26:52,120
I think so.

325
00:26:52,120 --> 00:26:53,120
Yep.

326
00:26:53,120 --> 00:26:54,120
No.

327
00:26:54,120 --> 00:26:56,120
TM. TM. Just say TM and you're good.

328
00:26:56,120 --> 00:26:59,760
Yeah. I've listened to a lot of great podcasts over the year, but I'm actually wearing a

329
00:26:59,760 --> 00:27:04,720
t-shirt for a podcast that I enjoy called The Truth, and I thought I'd give that a shout

330
00:27:04,720 --> 00:27:10,460
out. It is immersive storytelling in the way that like, if you remember like old-timey

331
00:27:10,460 --> 00:27:15,000
radio programs used to be where they would have like the footprints on, you know, walking

332
00:27:15,000 --> 00:27:19,320
to the door and then like this creak of the door. They do all the cool effects and like

333
00:27:19,320 --> 00:27:24,460
really great voice acting and amazing original stories that will just blow your mind and

334
00:27:24,460 --> 00:27:27,880
have you like sitting in the car after you park somewhere just to hear how the story

335
00:27:27,880 --> 00:27:32,880
wraps up. It's freely available. I think it's better than most crap on Netflix. So I would

336
00:27:32,880 --> 00:27:39,000
highly recommend The Truth podcast. It's available in all the usual places. And yeah, I mean,

337
00:27:39,000 --> 00:27:43,080
if storytelling is your thing, I think it's one of the better ones I've heard. So yeah,

338
00:27:43,080 --> 00:27:45,080
that'd be my recommendation.

339
00:27:45,080 --> 00:27:49,600
In that case, I want to give you a recommendation, Andy. It's called The Weird Place. It's a

340
00:27:49,600 --> 00:27:55,560
Dana Carvey production, and it's basically like six episodes, five episodes of like Twilight

341
00:27:55,560 --> 00:27:59,960
Zone type stories with Dana Carvey doing all the voices and they have the footprint sound

342
00:27:59,960 --> 00:28:04,360
effects and all that stuff telling, you know, kind of funny versions of Twilight Zone type

343
00:28:04,360 --> 00:28:05,360
stories.

344
00:28:05,360 --> 00:28:06,360
The Weird Place. I'll check it out.

345
00:28:06,360 --> 00:28:12,680
The Weird Place. All right. So for me, it's all about fantasy football. I mean, I've played

346
00:28:12,680 --> 00:28:18,480
fantasy football since 1999, but when I started listening to fantasy football podcasts, one

347
00:28:18,480 --> 00:28:23,760
in particular, the Fantasy Footballers, it took my interest to another level. Hearing

348
00:28:23,760 --> 00:28:27,760
these guys, three guys so passionate about it and having so much fun with it. It also

349
00:28:27,760 --> 00:28:31,200
inspired me to want to do a podcast because they were having so much fun talking about

350
00:28:31,200 --> 00:28:35,960
this thing they love. So part of the reason we're here is because I was listening to those

351
00:28:35,960 --> 00:28:41,020
three dudes on the Fantasy Footballers and winning championships with the information.

352
00:28:41,020 --> 00:28:45,440
Now everybody knows about them, but at the time in 2015, they were brand new. They were

353
00:28:45,440 --> 00:28:50,680
recording out of someone's bedroom in one of their houses and now they, you know, they

354
00:28:50,680 --> 00:28:56,480
have a studio and they go on tour. And so, yeah, I learned not only about football, but

355
00:28:56,480 --> 00:28:58,080
podcasting from those guys.

356
00:28:58,080 --> 00:29:03,240
Yeah. Well, I mean, I've, I've listened to so many, so many podcasts and I, you know,

357
00:29:03,240 --> 00:29:08,800
a lot of them are educational, but I'll just focus on one. There's one called Grammar

358
00:29:08,800 --> 00:29:16,600
Girl, Quick and Dirty Tips. Yeah. Yeah. The podcast, it's, it's pretty short, but you

359
00:29:16,600 --> 00:29:21,440
know, every week she's talking about, you know, sort of grammatical mistakes people

360
00:29:21,440 --> 00:29:27,280
make or, you know, there'll be explanations for why things are a certain way and explanations

361
00:29:27,280 --> 00:29:32,800
of like the, the Oxford comma and stuff like that. And I don't know why it interests me,

362
00:29:32,800 --> 00:29:36,720
maybe because I like to be that guy that, you know, criticizes people for their, for

363
00:29:36,720 --> 00:29:38,500
their grammar.

364
00:29:38,500 --> 00:29:40,520
And they love you for it, I'm sure.

365
00:29:40,520 --> 00:29:46,760
But yeah, so it's, it's Grammar Girl, Quick and Dirty Tips. What have you guys learned

366
00:29:46,760 --> 00:29:53,640
from, from other podcasts? Hit up the socials, go on our Discord and let us know.

367
00:29:53,640 --> 00:29:54,640
Albinerds.com slash Discord.

368
00:29:54,640 --> 00:29:55,640
200

369
00:29:55,640 --> 00:30:01,560
I prefer the purity of the human voice really. Let me, let me, let me just, let me just demonstrate,

370
00:30:01,560 --> 00:30:02,560
all right?

371
00:30:02,560 --> 00:30:13,080
So we're going with Paul Simon today and the album Graceland. We won't be going with his

372
00:30:13,080 --> 00:30:17,920
version of Gin and Juice, but I thought it was pretty interesting that he, that he did

373
00:30:17,920 --> 00:30:18,920
it. It was a joke.

374
00:30:18,920 --> 00:30:21,560
You gotta like the guy who, who will do something like that. It's funny.

375
00:30:21,560 --> 00:30:29,420
So Graceland, the album released August, 1986 by Paul Simon, number 46 on the Rolling Stone

376
00:30:29,420 --> 00:30:36,160
Top 200 that we worked from. It's a seven studio album, solo studio album. And it's

377
00:30:36,160 --> 00:30:42,520
a blend of sounds. It's Paul Simon mixing things up with some influences from South

378
00:30:42,520 --> 00:30:47,280
African music. And it's quite the sensation. Why don't we get going with the title track

379
00:30:47,280 --> 00:30:48,280
Graceland.

380
00:30:48,280 --> 00:31:05,000
I was like a young teenager, I think when this came out and I, my dad had the record,

381
00:31:05,000 --> 00:31:09,360
you know, everyone had the record. It was a sold like 7 million copies. It was a comeback

382
00:31:09,360 --> 00:31:14,440
for Paul Simon after a failed album before it. And that line, my traveling companion

383
00:31:14,440 --> 00:31:19,000
is nine years old. He's the child of my first marriage. I just like, that's when I started

384
00:31:19,000 --> 00:31:25,800
to understand Paul Simon's style that using short describers to set a scene and then kind

385
00:31:25,800 --> 00:31:30,920
of going on to the next thing, but just that crisp, clear delivery of his. Three words

386
00:31:30,920 --> 00:31:39,560
I used to describe this album are Ryman Simon's rhythms. Ryman Simon's rhythms. So he had

387
00:31:39,560 --> 00:31:47,480
an album called Ryman Simon, but it's a blend of his style, you know, his vocal style, that

388
00:31:47,480 --> 00:31:53,720
crisp clean delivery, the lyrical style, little storytelling elements, and then the poetic

389
00:31:53,720 --> 00:32:01,760
that comes from it. And then this rhythm driven South African music that inspired him. Apparently

390
00:32:01,760 --> 00:32:06,680
he was inspired by a bootleg cassette of a South African street music called God.

391
00:32:06,680 --> 00:32:09,720
We've talked about it before, but-

392
00:32:09,720 --> 00:32:17,600
Mba-gong, it's M-B-A-Q-A-N-G-A. He traveled to Johannesburg in 84 to collaborate with

393
00:32:17,600 --> 00:32:22,360
local musicians and then additional recordings took place in the United States. There were

394
00:32:22,360 --> 00:32:27,960
some controversies because there were embargoes on things in South Africa. We weren't supposed

395
00:32:27,960 --> 00:32:33,140
to mix with them because of the apartheid. So there was a lot of controversy about whether

396
00:32:33,140 --> 00:32:37,920
he should or shouldn't have done that, if any rules were broken. But, well, we get to

397
00:32:37,920 --> 00:32:42,760
another song and see where the conversation takes us. This is Diamonds on the Soles of

398
00:32:42,760 --> 00:32:43,760
His Shoes.

399
00:32:43,760 --> 00:32:59,480
It was hard for me to pick one track off this record, but I think that one nicely encapsulates

400
00:32:59,480 --> 00:33:04,960
the sound that he achieves on Graceland, which I think is awesome and a real achievement

401
00:33:04,960 --> 00:33:11,920
to Paul Simon and what he was open to exploring in his career. I think he still explores even

402
00:33:11,920 --> 00:33:17,680
to this day in his career. My three words are, it's better together. This is like one

403
00:33:17,680 --> 00:33:23,440
of those rare cases where the idea for the record itself, I think sounded terrible on

404
00:33:23,440 --> 00:33:31,840
paper, but it worked out beautifully. He really did create something unique and new and exciting.

405
00:33:31,840 --> 00:33:35,520
I don't know if it's really been replicated since then. It's this amalgamation of all

406
00:33:35,520 --> 00:33:39,720
these different sounds. Part of it is South African influence, but there's also things

407
00:33:39,720 --> 00:33:44,620
from the US too, like Zydeco is pretty prevalent on the record. There's still pop and folk

408
00:33:44,620 --> 00:33:50,240
influences here as well. It all just comes together. I think what makes this so cool

409
00:33:50,240 --> 00:33:55,080
is it doesn't try to sound like it's saying something specific about South Africa or apartheid.

410
00:33:55,080 --> 00:33:59,880
It's just like its own thing existing naturally in the world and it works really well.

411
00:33:59,880 --> 00:34:04,840
It's celebrating the sounds. That rhythm in that music is unique and then finding a way

412
00:34:04,840 --> 00:34:10,000
to blend that with good old Paul Simon with some of the same kind of affectations he would

413
00:34:10,000 --> 00:34:14,880
have done in an acoustic album. It is unbelievable that it worked.

414
00:34:14,880 --> 00:34:16,480
Yes, it's a small miracle.

415
00:34:16,480 --> 00:34:22,840
Some people freaking loved it. The artists included, like South African male choral group,

416
00:34:22,840 --> 00:34:30,840
Ladysmith, Black Mambazo came to be known because of this. They ended up having a lot

417
00:34:30,840 --> 00:34:36,960
of success in the US after this album. They toured with him, other artists that played

418
00:34:36,960 --> 00:34:43,560
on this got writing credits on the songs. It wasn't Paul Simon just taking a sound and

419
00:34:43,560 --> 00:34:48,520
stealing it and making it all about him. I would have liked to have seen the Paul Simon

420
00:34:48,520 --> 00:34:51,000
and blah, blah, blah on the album cover.

421
00:34:51,000 --> 00:34:55,120
Yeah, I don't know. I had read a little bit about the background of it and I got the impression

422
00:34:55,120 --> 00:34:59,920
on those. He paid the artists very well for their time on the recordings and they got,

423
00:34:59,920 --> 00:35:02,240
like you said, a lot of notoriety from the record.

424
00:35:02,240 --> 00:35:07,040
All right, so big time album. Why don't we listen to the big time single, You Can Call

425
00:35:07,040 --> 00:35:14,120
Me Out.

426
00:35:14,120 --> 00:35:20,560
Time making a little bass face.

427
00:35:20,560 --> 00:35:29,200
Yep. That bass there, that was a guy named, I'm not butchers, Baghiti Kumalo, who's a

428
00:35:29,200 --> 00:35:36,720
South African bass player. That bass solo there is palindromic or palindromic. Basically,

429
00:35:36,720 --> 00:35:41,160
they were the first half of it they recorded and then they just played it backwards.

430
00:35:41,160 --> 00:35:42,160
Interesting.

431
00:35:42,160 --> 00:35:46,960
Yeah, I thought it was pretty cool. Yeah, I mean everybody knows that song so I just

432
00:35:46,960 --> 00:35:51,520
wanted to focus on that little instrumental part there. One thing I really like on that

433
00:35:51,520 --> 00:35:59,280
song is that the muted string guitar there, which I think actually is a six string electric

434
00:35:59,280 --> 00:36:03,840
bass which is an instrument I'm kind of obsessed with because that's what Robert Smith plays

435
00:36:03,840 --> 00:36:08,880
on disintegration. So yeah, I think that's Paul Simon playing that part.

436
00:36:08,880 --> 00:36:14,880
So the lyrics to You Can Call Me Out basically to me seems like a midlife crisis kind of

437
00:36:14,880 --> 00:36:22,200
thing. And the origin of the title is supposedly a French composer and conductor named Pierre

438
00:36:22,200 --> 00:36:28,440
Boulet was attending this party with Paul Simon and his wife Peggy Harper. This Boulet

439
00:36:28,440 --> 00:36:34,240
guy basically called him Al and he called his wife Betty. So yeah, that's where it came

440
00:36:34,240 --> 00:36:35,240
from.

441
00:36:35,240 --> 00:36:40,820
Another interesting fact about that song, that saxophone hook there, the da-da-da-da-da.

442
00:36:40,820 --> 00:36:47,320
I mean that's several layered saxophones but also in there is a synthesized guitar that

443
00:36:47,320 --> 00:36:52,960
kind of sounds like a saxophone that was done by the guitarist Adrian Bello. So the three

444
00:36:52,960 --> 00:36:59,820
words I chose to describe the album, never stands still. So Paul Simon, even going back

445
00:36:59,820 --> 00:37:06,880
to Simon and Garfunkel, I mean he's just an artist that's constantly reinventing himself.

446
00:37:06,880 --> 00:37:12,960
He never gets comfortable doing just one thing. He's always challenging himself. And I mean

447
00:37:12,960 --> 00:37:20,560
he just does an amazing job here borrowing from Zulu sounds and stuff like that and Zydeco.

448
00:37:20,560 --> 00:37:24,840
But I think people can get the wrong impression if they don't listen to this album that it's

449
00:37:24,840 --> 00:37:30,240
just Paul Simon doing Zulu music or Paul Simon doing Zydeco. And it's not. It's a Paul Simon

450
00:37:30,240 --> 00:37:37,640
record that's just using these influences. So it's like he's, if you follow his career,

451
00:37:37,640 --> 00:37:41,900
he's always done that. He's like a sponge just absorbing all these things and he integrates

452
00:37:41,900 --> 00:37:44,840
it into his unique songwriting.

453
00:37:44,840 --> 00:37:50,480
His songwriting is a bit different. I think on this album it's more of like a groove-based

454
00:37:50,480 --> 00:37:56,200
songwriting. Whereas I think in the early days it was more about like a melodic hook.

455
00:37:56,200 --> 00:38:00,320
Although there are plenty of those on this album. There are some really pretty parts

456
00:38:00,320 --> 00:38:01,640
and some nice melody.

457
00:38:01,640 --> 00:38:06,320
I feel like lyrically on this record I have a hard time following what he's talking about.

458
00:38:06,320 --> 00:38:10,720
It feels like a lot of in-jokes like you were describing there about the dinner party. Whereas

459
00:38:10,720 --> 00:38:14,240
past records I feel like I can understand why he's getting that more. I don't mind

460
00:38:14,240 --> 00:38:17,600
it in this context because the music's so interesting, but do you find like you can

461
00:38:17,600 --> 00:38:18,680
follow these songs?

462
00:38:18,680 --> 00:38:23,280
I think at this point in his career and life, I think he was on his second divorce. This

463
00:38:23,280 --> 00:38:31,760
was with Carrie Fisher. And like even Graceland was started about that, about his divorce

464
00:38:31,760 --> 00:38:36,640
and this place in his life that he's at. The Graceland part came from the sound of the

465
00:38:36,640 --> 00:38:42,880
song. It reminded him of old Sun recordings, the groove of it. And so the Graceland word

466
00:38:42,880 --> 00:38:47,680
was stuck in his head and then he decided to take a trip to Graceland to fill in the

467
00:38:47,680 --> 00:38:52,920
song. And so that's kind of what listening to it throughout my life I've always kind

468
00:38:52,920 --> 00:38:57,240
of felt like he had looked left and wrote about it. He looked right, he wrote about

469
00:38:57,240 --> 00:39:02,960
it. He woke up from a dream, remembered something, wrote about it. That's what it felt like.

470
00:39:02,960 --> 00:39:09,000
Doesn't the album sonically, doesn't it feel sort of spacious? I feel like it's like a

471
00:39:09,000 --> 00:39:11,080
big open field or something.

472
00:39:11,080 --> 00:39:13,200
Feels like a road trip, like you're on a drive.

473
00:39:13,200 --> 00:39:17,640
To me it feels more like an island beach setting, just like where things are open and vast and

474
00:39:17,640 --> 00:39:19,280
you can see far.

475
00:39:19,280 --> 00:39:23,960
Maybe because as a youth I never saw an island or a beach.

476
00:39:23,960 --> 00:39:24,960
In the Midwest.

477
00:39:24,960 --> 00:39:32,520
Part of the Midwest I was living in. So yeah, it was about flat planes and long drives.

478
00:39:32,520 --> 00:39:36,960
Well, same idea, that far horizon idea.

479
00:39:36,960 --> 00:39:43,520
All right, so this is a highly acclaimed album, considered one of the best of all time. And

480
00:39:43,520 --> 00:39:49,280
he did some amazing stuff here and captured me as a teenager when this kind of, this was

481
00:39:49,280 --> 00:39:52,880
old people music, but there was still something special about it and I've loved it throughout

482
00:39:52,880 --> 00:39:59,160
my life. So I'm going to nominate this for the album Nudes Hell and Fame.

483
00:39:59,160 --> 00:40:01,560
And a yes from me.

484
00:40:01,560 --> 00:40:04,880
Yeah, I think I will go yes on this one as well.

485
00:40:04,880 --> 00:40:05,880
Face, Don.

486
00:40:05,880 --> 00:40:11,240
I've always really liked this record and it holds up. It still sounds really cool. And

487
00:40:11,240 --> 00:40:14,680
I still stand by like there's really no other record that I've ever heard that sounds this

488
00:40:14,680 --> 00:40:17,000
blend of genres. It's cool.

489
00:40:17,000 --> 00:40:21,280
Just because Andy likes it, I'm kind of like, I'm feeling like I don't want to say yes.

490
00:40:21,280 --> 00:40:22,280
Don't punish me, man.

491
00:40:22,280 --> 00:40:28,520
This is why I don't nominate records anymore. I don't want to. It's anxiety.

492
00:40:28,520 --> 00:40:31,200
We're out for blood.

493
00:40:31,200 --> 00:40:34,800
This is definitely, you know, this is a great album.

494
00:40:34,800 --> 00:40:42,800
All right, welcome Paul Simon. Yet another notch on the bedpost. Another accolade. That

495
00:40:42,800 --> 00:40:50,320
was Paul Simon's Graceland newly inducted Album Nerds Hall of Fame member.

496
00:40:50,320 --> 00:40:59,520
Okay. So we took a journey through the top 200 of Rolling Stone's list of greatest albums

497
00:40:59,520 --> 00:41:01,840
of all time. What did we learn?

498
00:41:01,840 --> 00:41:06,040
You know, there's a reason we don't see a lot of lists on this podcast. I think lists

499
00:41:06,040 --> 00:41:10,720
are just right for problems and critiques. Obviously they've edited things a lot over

500
00:41:10,720 --> 00:41:15,200
the years. I know people were pretty upset when this list first came out and people are

501
00:41:15,200 --> 00:41:18,320
always going to be upset. But I think they did a pretty good job. Like there weren't

502
00:41:18,320 --> 00:41:23,080
a lot of like glaring admissions. I mean, the one, probably the biggest thing you could

503
00:41:23,080 --> 00:41:27,120
say is like, these are all ours from like the Western part of the world generally. And

504
00:41:27,120 --> 00:41:30,600
you really ignore more than half of the globe.

505
00:41:30,600 --> 00:41:37,200
And largely mainstream hit making for the most part. There's not a lot of deep dive

506
00:41:37,200 --> 00:41:39,200
unknowns on here.

507
00:41:39,200 --> 00:41:43,200
Totally. I did appreciate the amount of hip hop that is represented, especially in the

508
00:41:43,200 --> 00:41:48,480
top 100. There's quite a bit, though it's mostly like 90s hip hop.

509
00:41:48,480 --> 00:41:53,080
One thing I struggled with is some of the more recent artists that are in there. Some

510
00:41:53,080 --> 00:41:58,400
of them are quite high on the list. People like Taylor Swift and Beyonce and like nothing

511
00:41:58,400 --> 00:42:05,000
against those artists or modern music. But I feel like we're not removed enough from

512
00:42:05,000 --> 00:42:11,400
this era to really know where those records stand. It's easy to point to a Beatles record

513
00:42:11,400 --> 00:42:18,560
and recognize its influence, but I'm not sure what Taylor Swift's legacy is or Beyonce's.

514
00:42:18,560 --> 00:42:24,400
I think that leans into what I learned, which was this isn't static. So today this is the

515
00:42:24,400 --> 00:42:31,320
truth and that's why they redo it. And it's based on people's opinions. Stuff changes.

516
00:42:31,320 --> 00:42:38,200
And that's what I learned is that these lists move with the time and I'd like moving with

517
00:42:38,200 --> 00:42:39,200
them.

518
00:42:39,200 --> 00:42:40,200
And that's one Negron.

519
00:42:40,200 --> 00:42:41,200
I'm your density. I mean your destiny.

520
00:42:41,200 --> 00:42:59,920
All right, boys and girls gather around. It's time once again to get out that wheel of musical

521
00:42:59,920 --> 00:43:12,200
destiny and see what Wadbot has in store for us next week. Give it a spin.

522
00:43:12,200 --> 00:43:17,280
Whispering rain on the window. Album spin in the haze. The music you play cuts through

523
00:43:17,280 --> 00:43:22,080
the gray. Your musical destiny is to contemplate rainy day albums.

524
00:43:22,080 --> 00:43:23,080
Rainy day albums.

525
00:43:23,080 --> 00:43:24,080
It's very subjective.

526
00:43:24,080 --> 00:43:25,080
I like that.

527
00:43:25,080 --> 00:43:26,080
It could be fun.

528
00:43:26,080 --> 00:43:29,480
It doesn't have to necessarily be about rain, but something you'd want to put on whether

529
00:43:29,480 --> 00:43:30,480
it was right or not.

530
00:43:30,480 --> 00:43:34,880
What's your favorite rainy day album? What else are you listening to? Let us know. Join

531
00:43:34,880 --> 00:43:40,040
fellow Album Nerds on Discord at AlbumNerds.com slash Discord. You can email us at podcast

532
00:43:40,040 --> 00:43:45,240
at AlbumNerds.com. You can follow us on Facebook and Instagram at Album Nerds. And please subscribe,

533
00:43:45,240 --> 00:43:49,080
rate and review on your favorite podcast app. If you'd like to support the show, you can

534
00:43:49,080 --> 00:43:52,880
do so via PayPal at AlbumNerds.com slash support.

535
00:43:52,880 --> 00:43:57,040
Thank you once again for joining us on the Album Nerds podcast. Maybe this is your 200th

536
00:43:57,040 --> 00:44:01,240
time. Maybe it's your first. Either way, come back next week. We'll be talking about rainy

537
00:44:01,240 --> 00:44:02,240
day albums.

538
00:44:02,240 --> 00:44:05,880
What up? Thanks for listening, everybody. Catch you on 201.

539
00:44:05,880 --> 00:44:06,880
Happy 200.

540
00:44:06,880 --> 00:44:12,360
A man walks down my street says, why am I recording a podcast? Why am I recording a

541
00:44:12,360 --> 00:44:16,960
podcast when everything I have to say is dumb, dumb?

542
00:44:16,960 --> 00:44:22,320
Something B-side's a great slam, right?

543
00:44:22,320 --> 00:44:25,320
I just wrote that in the middle of the show.

544
00:44:25,320 --> 00:44:27,320
200.

