WEBVTT

00:00:13.740 --> 00:00:16.620
Hello and welcome to Listen Up People, a podcast

00:00:16.620 --> 00:00:19.399
of the USC Suzanne Dworak -Peck School of Social

00:00:19.399 --> 00:00:22.059
Work. I'm Dr. Eric Rice, professor and associate

00:00:22.059 --> 00:00:25.300
dean for research. This episode, we are focusing

00:00:25.300 --> 00:00:30.420
on advancing addiction science. In 2024, 48 .4

00:00:30.420 --> 00:00:33.259
million people aged 12 or older had a substance

00:00:33.259 --> 00:00:36.060
use disorder in the past year, yet only one in

00:00:36.060 --> 00:00:38.719
five people received treatment. My guests today

00:00:38.719 --> 00:00:41.799
are part of the USC Institute for Addiction Science,

00:00:42.200 --> 00:00:44.460
which aims to revolutionize the way substance

00:00:44.460 --> 00:00:47.079
use is discussed and treated and prevented. I'd

00:00:47.079 --> 00:00:49.200
like to welcome Dr. Jennifer Lewis, teaching

00:00:49.200 --> 00:00:51.820
professor and director of the Master of Social

00:00:51.820 --> 00:00:55.460
Work program, and Dr. Olivia Lee, associate professor

00:00:55.460 --> 00:00:58.369
and director of the PhD. It's great to have you

00:00:58.369 --> 00:01:00.549
both here with us. Hi, thank you for having us.

00:01:00.750 --> 00:01:03.850
So I want to start off with something that I've

00:01:03.850 --> 00:01:05.750
been enjoying doing for the past few episodes,

00:01:05.829 --> 00:01:08.090
which is to ask people a personal question as

00:01:08.090 --> 00:01:10.209
we get this started, which is why did you get

00:01:10.209 --> 00:01:12.829
involved in this kind of work? So maybe I'll

00:01:12.829 --> 00:01:16.150
turn to Jen, you first, but what got you interested

00:01:16.150 --> 00:01:19.329
in addiction? Thank you again for having me.

00:01:19.329 --> 00:01:21.810
And I'm happy to share a little bit about this

00:01:21.810 --> 00:01:25.890
really exciting initiative with USC. You know,

00:01:25.890 --> 00:01:28.870
as a clinician in practice, I think so many of

00:01:28.870 --> 00:01:32.150
us worked with individuals who had co -occurring

00:01:32.150 --> 00:01:35.450
disorders. And back in the day, not to show my

00:01:35.450 --> 00:01:39.430
age, but anybody we were assessing, we were determining

00:01:39.430 --> 00:01:43.170
whether or not they had addiction that preceded

00:01:43.170 --> 00:01:46.010
their mental health issues or were a consequence

00:01:46.010 --> 00:01:49.670
of potentially. And depending on what we found,

00:01:49.750 --> 00:01:53.829
we would refer them to services either for addiction

00:01:53.829 --> 00:01:56.140
or for mental health. health. And even at the

00:01:56.140 --> 00:01:58.140
time, I just thought that this does not make

00:01:58.140 --> 00:02:00.480
sense. This really, you know, so many of these

00:02:00.480 --> 00:02:04.719
issues are intertwined. And so separating into

00:02:04.719 --> 00:02:08.139
those, those different areas just didn't make

00:02:08.139 --> 00:02:12.280
sense to me. And in during that time, the treatment

00:02:12.280 --> 00:02:15.099
that we had available was really focused on,

00:02:15.159 --> 00:02:18.879
you know, like peer led addiction treatment and

00:02:18.879 --> 00:02:21.659
versus the mental health side, which had more

00:02:21.659 --> 00:02:23.979
evidence based interventions and professional

00:02:23.849 --> 00:02:27.490
care. And so it just, it seemed at the time that,

00:02:27.490 --> 00:02:30.530
you know, they weren't great options and maybe

00:02:30.530 --> 00:02:33.770
not the best for the, the clients that we were

00:02:33.770 --> 00:02:35.870
working with. Yeah. Yeah. Olivia, how about you?

00:02:35.969 --> 00:02:38.389
How did you get involved in addiction work? Uh,

00:02:38.990 --> 00:02:42.889
so let me think. So like, so kind of similar

00:02:42.889 --> 00:02:47.319
to what Janice is saying. So before me joining

00:02:47.319 --> 00:02:50.259
in a PhD program and a whole kind of thing, I

00:02:50.259 --> 00:02:52.659
was a practitioner. I was a social worker in

00:02:52.659 --> 00:02:55.240
the field. And before that one, there's a practicum

00:02:55.240 --> 00:02:58.560
and all of those. And you saw the intersection

00:02:58.560 --> 00:03:03.340
between the poverty and then substance use a

00:03:03.340 --> 00:03:06.479
lot. But back then, before me joining the PhD

00:03:06.479 --> 00:03:10.050
program, My obsession was a poverty, so I did

00:03:10.050 --> 00:03:12.430
not really see the substance use of science that

00:03:12.430 --> 00:03:14.770
much, even if I was working with them and a whole

00:03:14.770 --> 00:03:18.370
kind of thing. But my interest in the substance

00:03:18.370 --> 00:03:21.409
use is really picked up and I clearly see the

00:03:21.409 --> 00:03:25.129
intersection from the PhD program. I was a part

00:03:25.129 --> 00:03:29.680
of. this research group and I was on the grant

00:03:29.680 --> 00:03:32.419
and study, so really study about the kind of

00:03:32.419 --> 00:03:35.680
social determinant of substance use and whole

00:03:35.680 --> 00:03:38.740
kind of thing. So that was how my trajectory,

00:03:38.939 --> 00:03:41.840
but like a beginning was like Jen was in the

00:03:41.840 --> 00:03:44.819
field by working with people, see them one, it

00:03:44.819 --> 00:03:49.180
was in me and then it blossomed in the PhD program.

00:03:49.419 --> 00:03:51.020
Yeah, that's so interesting to hear both of you

00:03:51.020 --> 00:03:53.240
talk about your experiences as practitioners

00:03:53.240 --> 00:03:56.060
informing this. I think From my perspective,

00:03:56.099 --> 00:03:58.340
at least, I don't know that a lot of people think

00:03:58.340 --> 00:04:01.599
about social work and social workers as having

00:04:01.599 --> 00:04:05.439
a lot to do with addiction. And yet for the two

00:04:05.439 --> 00:04:08.539
of you, I know we have both a strong commitment

00:04:08.539 --> 00:04:11.280
to both educational programs and research programs

00:04:11.280 --> 00:04:13.580
driven by your social work and your passion.

00:04:13.620 --> 00:04:16.180
So it's really great to see. I guess I want to

00:04:16.180 --> 00:04:18.810
turn to talking about each of those. Things right

00:04:18.810 --> 00:04:21.209
the educational programs as well as the research

00:04:21.209 --> 00:04:23.410
programs and maybe we'll start a little bit with

00:04:23.410 --> 00:04:26.529
the education part of things. Jen, I know you've

00:04:26.529 --> 00:04:30.360
been. deeply involved with creating new programs

00:04:30.360 --> 00:04:33.300
around addiction here at USC. Can you talk about

00:04:33.300 --> 00:04:35.980
those programs? Yeah, you know, interestingly,

00:04:36.620 --> 00:04:39.420
when we look at social work programs around the

00:04:39.420 --> 00:04:41.939
country, we all have accreditation standards.

00:04:41.980 --> 00:04:44.779
And so there's some uniformity with all of us.

00:04:45.040 --> 00:04:47.560
We oftentimes differ in terms of our specializations,

00:04:47.740 --> 00:04:49.639
but at least at the foundation level, it's all

00:04:49.639 --> 00:04:51.639
sort of the same. And we have a lot of competencies

00:04:51.639 --> 00:04:55.680
to cover. And addiction is not one of them. Interestingly,

00:04:55.680 --> 00:04:59.399
so if we as programs in this country are going

00:04:59.399 --> 00:05:02.720
to insert addiction knowledge, you know, we do

00:05:02.720 --> 00:05:05.819
so in the form of electives or maybe a specialization,

00:05:05.819 --> 00:05:09.019
but it really isn't uniform. And so in our program

00:05:09.019 --> 00:05:11.839
specifically, we just didn't have a lot. And

00:05:11.839 --> 00:05:14.600
while CSWE had provided some guidance around

00:05:14.600 --> 00:05:17.759
addiction education, we had we had pieces of

00:05:17.759 --> 00:05:19.939
it, but we weren't doing it comprehensively.

00:05:20.100 --> 00:05:24.560
And so I became really interested in the Institute

00:05:24.560 --> 00:05:27.480
for Addiction Science, which was an institute

00:05:27.480 --> 00:05:31.000
where education was part of their mission across

00:05:31.000 --> 00:05:34.160
transdisciplinary across the university. And

00:05:34.160 --> 00:05:36.720
they were starting a master's in addiction science

00:05:36.720 --> 00:05:41.920
as a transdisciplinary degree so that it was

00:05:41.920 --> 00:05:46.180
bringing social work, public health, pharmacy

00:05:46.180 --> 00:05:49.959
and medicine to the table to develop curriculum,

00:05:50.079 --> 00:05:52.540
literally to sit down with each other, build

00:05:52.540 --> 00:05:55.079
relationships and develop curriculum that would

00:05:55.079 --> 00:05:57.920
serve all of our professions with the intent

00:05:57.920 --> 00:06:01.100
that our students would not only receive the

00:06:01.100 --> 00:06:04.500
education, but would learn at the same time in

00:06:04.500 --> 00:06:07.459
classrooms with other professionals and so not

00:06:07.459 --> 00:06:10.199
just learning with their own profession and then

00:06:10.199 --> 00:06:12.379
going into the field and working with different

00:06:12.379 --> 00:06:14.540
professions, but actually learning with different

00:06:14.540 --> 00:06:16.889
professions. So I was not only interested in

00:06:16.889 --> 00:06:20.089
increasing or enhancing the social work knowledge

00:06:20.089 --> 00:06:24.610
within addiction, but really the idea of interprofessional

00:06:24.610 --> 00:06:28.129
education or transdisciplinary education where

00:06:28.129 --> 00:06:30.569
people were learning together at the same time.

00:06:30.629 --> 00:06:35.310
Are you developing any social work specific programs

00:06:35.310 --> 00:06:38.790
or is it mostly a collaboration with the Institute?

00:06:38.970 --> 00:06:42.339
Well, we did something really Well, I think there

00:06:42.339 --> 00:06:45.180
was an opportunity for us. There was some funding

00:06:45.180 --> 00:06:48.259
from the state of California to do workforce

00:06:48.259 --> 00:06:51.240
development, because really, unfortunately, most

00:06:51.240 --> 00:06:54.860
of the certification and addiction is tailored

00:06:54.860 --> 00:06:58.519
towards laypeople, a lot of community colleges,

00:06:58.879 --> 00:07:00.980
or for people to get a certification in addiction.

00:07:00.980 --> 00:07:04.560
And it takes a long time in those settings. And

00:07:04.560 --> 00:07:07.120
so the state of California was interested in

00:07:07.120 --> 00:07:09.540
enhancing the workforce, making sure that we

00:07:09.540 --> 00:07:12.199
could create more knowledgeable addiction people.

00:07:12.560 --> 00:07:15.800
And so we actually were able to integrate our

00:07:15.800 --> 00:07:19.399
certification for addiction into our social work

00:07:19.399 --> 00:07:22.480
program. So individuals through the support,

00:07:22.540 --> 00:07:24.579
with the support of the state of California and

00:07:24.579 --> 00:07:28.040
funds that supplement their tuition, were able

00:07:28.040 --> 00:07:32.819
to receive a certification in addiction at the

00:07:32.819 --> 00:07:35.120
same time that they were receiving their masters

00:07:35.120 --> 00:07:38.079
of social work. So that was a way of sort of

00:07:38.079 --> 00:07:42.480
layering our masters in social work with additional

00:07:42.480 --> 00:07:45.779
addiction training without diminishing their

00:07:45.779 --> 00:07:47.879
their master of social work content that we're

00:07:47.879 --> 00:07:50.319
required to provide. That's really cool. I think

00:07:50.319 --> 00:07:53.699
one thing I'm excited about with today's podcast

00:07:53.699 --> 00:07:56.279
is that we have both the director of the MSW

00:07:56.279 --> 00:07:58.740
and the director of the PhD program on here.

00:07:59.120 --> 00:08:02.620
And so Olivia, I want to ask you How is it that

00:08:02.620 --> 00:08:05.800
you're engaging with our PhD students around

00:08:05.800 --> 00:08:09.019
issues in addiction and addiction science? So

00:08:09.019 --> 00:08:14.300
as you know, Eric, the PhD program is a little

00:08:14.300 --> 00:08:17.939
different from the MSW program, because my PhD

00:08:17.939 --> 00:08:21.920
program is driven by students' research interests.

00:08:22.620 --> 00:08:25.800
So whenever I see other students are interested

00:08:25.800 --> 00:08:28.699
in addiction, like PhD students are interested

00:08:28.699 --> 00:08:31.980
in addiction, Essentially, one of them I'm trying

00:08:31.980 --> 00:08:34.980
to do is engage them in activity, especially

00:08:34.980 --> 00:08:40.019
the research side of activity is going. the IAS

00:08:40.019 --> 00:08:44.480
Institute for Addiction Science. So for example,

00:08:44.700 --> 00:08:47.940
there is going to be some mini retreat, we call

00:08:47.940 --> 00:08:50.100
that one some mini retreat, by like a research

00:08:50.100 --> 00:08:54.259
retreat, where we are going to get together and

00:08:54.259 --> 00:08:57.200
kind of talking about the study, talking about

00:08:57.200 --> 00:08:59.799
the papers, maybe writing a grant together, that

00:08:59.799 --> 00:09:03.120
kind of thing is happening soon, like in October.

00:09:03.639 --> 00:09:08.120
And myself and my colleague, Dr. Eric Peterson,

00:09:08.559 --> 00:09:11.539
we're going to co -lead that conversation. So

00:09:11.539 --> 00:09:14.620
I invited, I spotted some PhD students who are

00:09:14.620 --> 00:09:17.799
interested in addiction or some of the data that

00:09:17.799 --> 00:09:20.179
is going to be discussed there. Then I invite

00:09:20.179 --> 00:09:22.759
them and they're engaged in the conversation.

00:09:23.370 --> 00:09:26.309
And also, some of our faculty colleagues are

00:09:26.309 --> 00:09:28.769
part of, like many of them, are actually part

00:09:28.769 --> 00:09:32.289
of this institute for addiction science so that

00:09:32.289 --> 00:09:34.990
they're going to be there as well. So I facilitate

00:09:34.990 --> 00:09:38.870
that kind of idea of addiction is really complicated

00:09:38.870 --> 00:09:42.590
problem. Social work alone cannot solve the problem.

00:09:43.070 --> 00:09:46.789
We need help and thinking together so that we

00:09:46.789 --> 00:09:49.929
can solve this addiction problem and provide

00:09:49.929 --> 00:09:53.559
the space. and invited PhD students who are interested

00:09:53.559 --> 00:09:56.940
in addiction, bring in the research space, and

00:09:56.940 --> 00:09:59.539
then they can get exposed, and then hopefully

00:09:59.539 --> 00:10:03.379
they can get some collaboration out of it. I'm

00:10:03.379 --> 00:10:05.639
cognizant of the fact that you both have mentioned

00:10:05.639 --> 00:10:07.519
this Institute for Addiction Science a couple

00:10:07.519 --> 00:10:10.960
of times in the answers that you've been providing

00:10:10.960 --> 00:10:13.720
for us this morning, and I'm wondering if maybe

00:10:13.720 --> 00:10:16.470
we could... take a minute to talk a little bit

00:10:16.470 --> 00:10:19.230
more about this institute and what it's all about

00:10:19.230 --> 00:10:22.110
and and how it functions. So maybe I'll turn

00:10:22.110 --> 00:10:24.830
to you, Olivia, first. So can you just give us

00:10:24.830 --> 00:10:28.029
a little bit of an overview of what is this Institute

00:10:28.029 --> 00:10:30.269
for Addiction Science and how and how have you

00:10:30.269 --> 00:10:34.549
been involved with it? So the yeah, the Institute

00:10:34.549 --> 00:10:37.590
for Addiction Science is actually mouthful because

00:10:37.590 --> 00:10:41.029
I never say the full name in a conversation and

00:10:41.029 --> 00:10:46.629
we call this one as IAS. affectionately and it's

00:10:46.629 --> 00:10:50.309
really like kind of nations of first as far as

00:10:50.309 --> 00:10:54.309
we know university wide like uh addiction science

00:10:54.309 --> 00:10:57.269
space and like we can talk about that one so

00:10:57.269 --> 00:10:59.769
what it is is like there are a lot of people

00:10:59.769 --> 00:11:02.789
from a multiple discipline not just from social

00:11:02.789 --> 00:11:06.029
work from the you know like medicine pharmacy

00:11:06.029 --> 00:11:10.799
and we have nursing folks as well and political

00:11:10.799 --> 00:11:14.779
science and really a wide range of disciplines

00:11:14.779 --> 00:11:17.899
get together and really trying to solve this

00:11:17.899 --> 00:11:21.340
like a complicated problem with addiction. Main

00:11:21.340 --> 00:11:24.740
thing that we are doing in that IAS is substance

00:11:24.740 --> 00:11:28.220
use and also other addiction problem like some

00:11:28.220 --> 00:11:30.899
of us are interested in gambling and whole thing

00:11:30.899 --> 00:11:35.940
and we have the research side, we have four different

00:11:35.940 --> 00:11:39.860
research affinity groups. and each research affinity

00:11:39.860 --> 00:11:41.940
group tackling on their front one. I'm going

00:11:41.940 --> 00:11:45.299
to just mention the one dose of four. The first

00:11:45.299 --> 00:11:48.220
one is called mechanism and treatment development.

00:11:48.500 --> 00:11:51.200
So it's a really treatment -focused group and

00:11:51.200 --> 00:11:54.159
a priority population and health equity. That

00:11:54.159 --> 00:11:56.980
is a vulnerable population, the substance use

00:11:56.980 --> 00:11:59.620
issue and addiction issues among the vulnerable

00:11:59.620 --> 00:12:03.620
population and addiction policy and health economics.

00:12:03.960 --> 00:12:06.679
As you can tell, it is a policy -oriented people.

00:12:06.889 --> 00:12:10.250
like for example, legalization of recreational

00:12:10.250 --> 00:12:12.929
cannabis, what is the impact of those on the

00:12:12.929 --> 00:12:15.570
substance use, those kind of thing, or tax policy,

00:12:15.730 --> 00:12:17.830
those kind of thing is happening in that group.

00:12:18.289 --> 00:12:20.769
And the final one is a community engagement and

00:12:20.769 --> 00:12:25.250
the dissemination. The IAS has really wanted

00:12:25.250 --> 00:12:29.029
to focus on and facilitate the collaboration

00:12:29.029 --> 00:12:32.809
between the research space and the community.

00:12:33.120 --> 00:12:36.580
and not just like isolated we are here and a

00:12:36.580 --> 00:12:38.720
community that are out there is nothing like

00:12:38.720 --> 00:12:42.670
that so so that we have like a constant interaction

00:12:42.670 --> 00:12:45.529
and that we invite the community members and

00:12:45.529 --> 00:12:48.049
we have like some workshop, we have a conversation,

00:12:48.350 --> 00:12:51.490
we have the community advisory board and there's

00:12:51.490 --> 00:12:53.850
ongoing conversation. There's a lot of cool things

00:12:53.850 --> 00:12:56.750
that are going on. So that is a little bit of

00:12:56.750 --> 00:12:59.769
kind of more research aside, but a general idea

00:12:59.769 --> 00:13:04.230
of IAS, interdisciplinary, the global people

00:13:04.230 --> 00:13:08.230
who are really obsessed with this substance is

00:13:08.230 --> 00:13:11.250
a problem. We really dedicate themselves to solve

00:13:11.250 --> 00:13:14.110
this problem. We all realize that this is really

00:13:14.110 --> 00:13:17.129
complex a problem. One discipline cannot solve

00:13:17.129 --> 00:13:20.129
it. So that's a nutshell for me. Jenna, how about

00:13:20.129 --> 00:13:26.509
you? I think that the same concepts apply on

00:13:26.509 --> 00:13:29.129
the curricular side in that we have, you know,

00:13:29.230 --> 00:13:32.230
even within our own university, but certainly

00:13:32.230 --> 00:13:35.570
nationally, there are so many Individuals doing

00:13:35.570 --> 00:13:40.289
such great work. around this area, and that just

00:13:40.289 --> 00:13:43.250
we don't oftentimes have an opportunity to really

00:13:43.250 --> 00:13:47.009
get together and share sort of, you know, across

00:13:47.009 --> 00:13:49.429
discipline, what kinds of things that people

00:13:49.429 --> 00:13:52.830
are doing, and engaging professions across discipline.

00:13:52.830 --> 00:13:56.289
And so in on the education side, the director

00:13:56.289 --> 00:14:00.549
of IAS and I are co teaching a course in the

00:14:00.549 --> 00:14:03.649
master addiction of addiction science. And it's

00:14:03.649 --> 00:14:07.539
the introductory course where students from social

00:14:07.539 --> 00:14:10.259
work and public health and undergrad and grad

00:14:10.259 --> 00:14:12.759
students and alumni. And people are coming back

00:14:12.759 --> 00:14:17.340
to take this course. We invite individuals across

00:14:17.340 --> 00:14:21.259
different areas, policy, research, practice,

00:14:21.659 --> 00:14:25.379
to speak about their experiences to a broad range

00:14:25.379 --> 00:14:30.100
of students. And so the students are able to

00:14:30.100 --> 00:14:33.820
really engage in the research or the practice

00:14:33.820 --> 00:14:37.039
or policy. in really meaningful ways. We have

00:14:37.039 --> 00:14:40.559
this one segment of our class that we do called

00:14:40.559 --> 00:14:44.460
Ask the Expert. This past week we had Christian

00:14:44.460 --> 00:14:47.610
Hendershott. coming and describing his research

00:14:47.610 --> 00:14:53.169
on the use of GLP -1 receptors like Ozempic and

00:14:53.169 --> 00:14:55.909
as a novel treatment for alcohol use disorder.

00:14:56.429 --> 00:14:58.870
And so, you know, these are social work students

00:14:58.870 --> 00:15:00.970
and public health students that would have probably

00:15:00.970 --> 00:15:04.409
never read those articles that were, you know,

00:15:04.570 --> 00:15:06.830
getting exposed to cutting edge research. So

00:15:06.830 --> 00:15:08.690
it was such, you know, it's really cool. We do

00:15:08.690 --> 00:15:11.169
one of those each week across different disciplines.

00:15:11.389 --> 00:15:14.509
That's very cool. I imagine the students in these

00:15:14.600 --> 00:15:17.159
settings have a lot of interesting conversations

00:15:17.159 --> 00:15:19.500
with one another because of the variety of backgrounds

00:15:19.500 --> 00:15:22.059
they come from. They really do. And I think,

00:15:22.139 --> 00:15:25.519
you know, in in our in the profession, more and

00:15:25.519 --> 00:15:28.659
more, there's opportunities for professionals

00:15:28.659 --> 00:15:31.759
to engage in treatment in addiction. Whereas,

00:15:31.840 --> 00:15:34.299
as I said earlier previously, it was more peer

00:15:34.299 --> 00:15:37.639
driven. But I think as it's professionalizing

00:15:37.639 --> 00:15:40.740
the different professional groups are working

00:15:40.740 --> 00:15:44.240
together in practice. And so I think it's that

00:15:44.240 --> 00:15:46.360
we have an opportunity to train them together

00:15:46.360 --> 00:15:49.340
is incredibly valuable. I like the way that both

00:15:49.340 --> 00:15:52.080
of you have described the complexity of working

00:15:52.080 --> 00:15:56.039
on the addiction problem and the need for this

00:15:56.039 --> 00:15:59.759
variety of intellectual perspectives, professional

00:15:59.759 --> 00:16:03.759
orientations. I'm personally a big fan of this,

00:16:03.879 --> 00:16:05.240
which I know the two of you know because I've

00:16:05.240 --> 00:16:07.980
been doing work with. social workers and engineers

00:16:07.980 --> 00:16:10.519
together for a while, but I really love this

00:16:10.519 --> 00:16:14.500
notion of bringing a variety of different intellectual

00:16:14.500 --> 00:16:18.000
perspectives together on research topics. And

00:16:18.000 --> 00:16:19.879
Olivia, I want to turn back to you for a second,

00:16:20.120 --> 00:16:22.799
pick up on a thread that you had started on where

00:16:22.799 --> 00:16:25.820
you were talking about research retreats with

00:16:25.820 --> 00:16:27.980
interdisciplinary groups of folks and involving

00:16:27.980 --> 00:16:31.360
the PhD students. You know, what sorts of opportunities

00:16:31.799 --> 00:16:35.600
Are there or have there been for you as a researcher

00:16:35.600 --> 00:16:38.799
in addiction science as a result of this IAS?

00:16:39.360 --> 00:16:45.720
Yeah, so the because of that the nature of IAS

00:16:45.720 --> 00:16:50.019
in the interdisciplinary and also we are very

00:16:50.019 --> 00:16:53.019
collegial like I was a part of the center grant.

00:16:53.399 --> 00:16:56.720
And when I was a part of the center grant, it

00:16:56.720 --> 00:16:59.860
was a lot of conversation. And I met a lot of

00:16:59.860 --> 00:17:02.960
people whom I have never met before. And also,

00:17:03.100 --> 00:17:06.720
like students in Jen and Adam's class, some of

00:17:06.720 --> 00:17:09.160
them I have never thought about it. As a person

00:17:09.160 --> 00:17:12.940
who was really focused on this poverty and socioeconomic

00:17:12.940 --> 00:17:16.059
status aside for the substance use, I did not

00:17:16.059 --> 00:17:18.539
think about like whatever other element. There's

00:17:18.539 --> 00:17:21.319
so many different elements going on. and I have

00:17:21.319 --> 00:17:24.299
not thought about it. Like there was a new collaboration

00:17:24.299 --> 00:17:27.460
happened between me and some of our colleagues.

00:17:27.619 --> 00:17:30.619
And I'm looking at the really policy aspect and

00:17:30.619 --> 00:17:33.839
neighborhood tax policy that I have never thought

00:17:33.839 --> 00:17:36.720
about it. What is the impact of those kind of

00:17:36.720 --> 00:17:39.619
thing? It's just really cool from that perspective.

00:17:40.059 --> 00:17:42.680
Because of a colleague who is so knowledgeable

00:17:42.680 --> 00:17:46.240
about that, it just made me, inevitably made

00:17:46.240 --> 00:17:49.079
me think about that. And then because of that

00:17:49.079 --> 00:17:52.200
synergy, we created something new together. That

00:17:52.200 --> 00:17:57.680
is really like magic about ISA for me. Absolutely.

00:17:58.799 --> 00:18:01.440
People who are in there and that collegiality,

00:18:01.619 --> 00:18:04.200
they're just willing to chime in with their ideas.

00:18:04.579 --> 00:18:06.819
And we talk about that one. Oh, yeah, that's

00:18:06.819 --> 00:18:09.380
awesome. Let's do it together. And then you make

00:18:09.380 --> 00:18:12.839
it happen. Now, like at the paper level and our

00:18:12.839 --> 00:18:15.440
PhD students, I'm hoping that they can be part

00:18:15.440 --> 00:18:18.160
of some new paper that I have never been before.

00:18:18.420 --> 00:18:21.160
So that is a productivity for our PhD student

00:18:21.160 --> 00:18:25.180
colleague. And then by involving in that collaboration,

00:18:25.619 --> 00:18:28.759
they're going to meet new people that intellectual

00:18:28.759 --> 00:18:32.039
space. That's what is really cool about IAS for

00:18:32.039 --> 00:18:35.099
me. No, I love that. And I want to give you an

00:18:35.099 --> 00:18:37.519
opportunity to talk a little bit about your research,

00:18:37.660 --> 00:18:40.259
Olivia, because, you know, you've just spent

00:18:40.259 --> 00:18:44.319
some time giving a lot of accolades to your colleagues

00:18:44.319 --> 00:18:46.940
who've been inspiring you, but you yourself are

00:18:46.940 --> 00:18:51.059
really an expert in this space. I know recently

00:18:51.059 --> 00:18:53.940
you got a big grant from the National Institute

00:18:53.940 --> 00:18:56.960
of Drug Abuse, yes, and I'm wondering if you

00:18:56.960 --> 00:19:00.180
can talk to our listeners a little bit about

00:19:00.180 --> 00:19:01.880
the work that you're doing and what are the kinds

00:19:01.880 --> 00:19:04.359
of questions that you're exploring in the space

00:19:04.359 --> 00:19:06.849
of addiction. that I can talk about forever.

00:19:08.690 --> 00:19:10.769
Whenever I can talk about like, can you talk

00:19:10.769 --> 00:19:12.990
about what you're doing? I can talk about forever.

00:19:13.450 --> 00:19:15.789
But I'm going to be trying to concise and one

00:19:15.789 --> 00:19:18.869
of the main thing, the essence of that grant

00:19:18.869 --> 00:19:22.730
is SES, social economic status. As you know,

00:19:22.869 --> 00:19:25.150
social economic status includes various things

00:19:25.150 --> 00:19:29.410
like education and income and wealth and job.

00:19:29.710 --> 00:19:34.309
And in this grant, we specifically focus on the

00:19:34.309 --> 00:19:37.990
role of job in the shaping substance use problem.

00:19:38.089 --> 00:19:41.269
So that's the main thing. And also we look at

00:19:41.269 --> 00:19:44.630
the neighborhood, the influence in that context,

00:19:44.849 --> 00:19:48.490
in the relationship between job and a substance

00:19:48.490 --> 00:19:51.690
use, what neighborhood or like role of a neighborhood,

00:19:51.910 --> 00:19:56.779
like we have. neighborhood level of density of

00:19:56.779 --> 00:19:59.039
outlet and whole kind of thing. And there's a

00:19:59.039 --> 00:20:01.480
whole whole list of steps. I'm not going to go

00:20:01.480 --> 00:20:04.799
there. And that is by my colleague Rosalind Pakula,

00:20:04.880 --> 00:20:08.400
Dr. Rosalind Pakula comes in. But anyhow, that

00:20:08.400 --> 00:20:11.420
is what this grant is about. And right now, the

00:20:11.420 --> 00:20:16.140
paper that we are working on is that we're looking

00:20:16.140 --> 00:20:20.599
at this employment status. Typically, including

00:20:20.599 --> 00:20:23.559
my own previous work, what we are doing is with

00:20:23.559 --> 00:20:26.960
employment, we split them up. Like in a way,

00:20:27.339 --> 00:20:29.980
you don't have a job, you have a job. Those are

00:20:29.980 --> 00:20:32.880
the one and see to compare those two, whether

00:20:32.880 --> 00:20:36.579
or not you lost your job that has negative impact

00:20:36.579 --> 00:20:38.720
on the substance use. That is a typical thing.

00:20:38.759 --> 00:20:42.079
That's what I did before too. But there are a

00:20:42.079 --> 00:20:46.289
lot of actually, if you think about In the today's

00:20:46.289 --> 00:20:49.869
job situation, it is not simple like that. There's

00:20:49.869 --> 00:20:53.490
a lot of more like a gray area. One of them is

00:20:53.490 --> 00:20:56.730
under employment. So you have a job, but you

00:20:56.730 --> 00:21:00.309
have a bad job. And then whether or not having

00:21:00.309 --> 00:21:03.109
a bad job has an influence on your substance

00:21:03.109 --> 00:21:06.069
use. So that that kind of thing. The other one

00:21:06.069 --> 00:21:10.769
is we are focusing on transition, not just at

00:21:10.769 --> 00:21:13.650
a given point, whether or not you have a job.

00:21:13.920 --> 00:21:16.799
but you have a bad job, or you don't have a job,

00:21:17.519 --> 00:21:19.880
or you're not working. Instead of just looking

00:21:19.880 --> 00:21:23.460
at those four categories at a single point, we're

00:21:23.460 --> 00:21:26.220
trying to understand their history, where they're

00:21:26.220 --> 00:21:29.339
coming from. Then right now they have a bad job,

00:21:29.779 --> 00:21:32.539
but it doesn't mean that they had a bad job before,

00:21:32.539 --> 00:21:35.619
or they actually had a good job and now they

00:21:35.619 --> 00:21:38.880
have a bad job. Versus, they did not have a job

00:21:38.880 --> 00:21:41.599
before, but now they have a job, even if that

00:21:41.599 --> 00:21:45.240
is not an ideal job. Does that trajectory has

00:21:45.240 --> 00:21:48.000
different influence on the substance use? That's

00:21:48.000 --> 00:21:50.900
what we are doing. The one interesting thing,

00:21:51.039 --> 00:21:54.319
at least really interesting to me, is that the

00:21:54.319 --> 00:21:56.940
trajectory wise, one other thing that we find

00:21:56.940 --> 00:22:00.720
is that downward movement, the meaning is you

00:22:00.720 --> 00:22:04.200
have a secure good job and move to the underemployed,

00:22:04.220 --> 00:22:08.380
so not a good job, while losing a job has negative

00:22:08.380 --> 00:22:10.920
impact on substance use. So specifically in this

00:22:10.920 --> 00:22:14.630
paper that I'm thinking, is binge drinking, problematic

00:22:14.630 --> 00:22:17.490
alcohol use. So that one is kind of expected.

00:22:17.650 --> 00:22:21.529
You had a secure job, you moved to the unfavorable

00:22:21.529 --> 00:22:24.309
employment status, so it has negative impact

00:22:24.309 --> 00:22:27.809
on substance use. That is one. But one of the

00:22:27.809 --> 00:22:30.450
really interesting thing, at least again to us,

00:22:30.630 --> 00:22:34.410
is that upward movement. So meaning is, you did

00:22:34.410 --> 00:22:36.950
not have a job, and not having a job, you're

00:22:36.950 --> 00:22:40.450
moving to a bad job situation. Now you have a

00:22:40.450 --> 00:22:43.839
job, but the job is bad. or you moving to the

00:22:43.839 --> 00:22:47.759
secure job and whether or not that has impact

00:22:47.759 --> 00:22:50.299
in terms of substance use, in terms of alcohol

00:22:50.299 --> 00:22:54.960
problem. What we see is if people move from the

00:22:54.960 --> 00:23:00.000
unemployed status to the secure job, the risk

00:23:00.000 --> 00:23:04.400
is the same to you staying in the secure job.

00:23:04.480 --> 00:23:07.180
So there is no difference. It does not have any

00:23:07.180 --> 00:23:11.039
importance. However, if you move not having a

00:23:11.039 --> 00:23:16.019
job to bad job, the risk actually increase. So

00:23:16.019 --> 00:23:19.480
that upward movement in the employment status,

00:23:20.200 --> 00:23:23.640
depending on your destination, your binge drinking

00:23:23.640 --> 00:23:27.339
risk differ. So these kind of thing that nuance

00:23:27.339 --> 00:23:30.960
understanding and then the policy implication,

00:23:31.319 --> 00:23:34.900
if we use any job is better, that means we may

00:23:34.900 --> 00:23:38.519
put the people in. not a good situation in terms

00:23:38.519 --> 00:23:41.319
of like alcohol problem. It's fascinating stuff.

00:23:41.380 --> 00:23:44.319
And I think you bring up a couple of things that

00:23:44.319 --> 00:23:46.720
I just can't help but comment on. I mean, one

00:23:46.720 --> 00:23:50.059
is that it's complex, right? Both of you have

00:23:50.059 --> 00:23:53.539
said over and over, this is complex. And even

00:23:53.539 --> 00:23:56.279
this one set of findings that you're sharing

00:23:56.279 --> 00:23:59.109
with us, there's complexity to it. The other

00:23:59.109 --> 00:24:00.849
thing that I think is really interesting is that

00:24:00.849 --> 00:24:04.690
it reflects also the stresses of transitions,

00:24:04.690 --> 00:24:07.950
right? That not necessarily, even if transitions

00:24:07.950 --> 00:24:11.750
might on some level seem like good transitions

00:24:11.750 --> 00:24:14.750
from the outside, you know, people don't necessarily

00:24:14.750 --> 00:24:18.069
always respond in the ways that we would think

00:24:18.069 --> 00:24:20.690
people would respond to those sorts of situations.

00:24:20.690 --> 00:24:23.450
And that's actually what I wanted to go with

00:24:23.450 --> 00:24:27.349
as a parting serve ideas. for us to talk about,

00:24:27.390 --> 00:24:29.650
which is that I think in a lot of social work

00:24:29.650 --> 00:24:33.029
domains, there's misunderstandings, right? People

00:24:33.029 --> 00:24:36.089
have preconceived notions about whole sorts of

00:24:36.089 --> 00:24:38.150
issues around mental health. And I'm sure that

00:24:38.150 --> 00:24:40.210
people have preconceived notions about substance

00:24:40.210 --> 00:24:42.309
use and addiction. And I'm wondering from your

00:24:42.309 --> 00:24:43.950
perspectives both, and maybe I'll turn first

00:24:43.950 --> 00:24:47.170
to you, Jen, and then to Olivia, if you had the

00:24:47.170 --> 00:24:49.769
opportunity to help our listeners understand

00:24:49.769 --> 00:24:53.430
better something about... addiction. Is there

00:24:53.430 --> 00:24:56.849
some some myth that you would like to myth bust?

00:24:57.769 --> 00:24:59.470
You know, let people know kind of what the reality

00:24:59.470 --> 00:25:02.390
of working with clients is really like. I appreciate

00:25:02.390 --> 00:25:04.849
that question, Erica, because I think that previous

00:25:04.849 --> 00:25:07.170
models, while effective for some, really looked

00:25:07.170 --> 00:25:09.650
at sort of the moral failings of individuals

00:25:09.650 --> 00:25:12.670
related to addiction. And a lot of the treatment

00:25:12.670 --> 00:25:15.769
was based on that. And so that may be helpful

00:25:15.769 --> 00:25:19.309
for some people, but not all. And I think the

00:25:19.309 --> 00:25:22.549
reason that social work is positioned very well

00:25:22.549 --> 00:25:25.609
to be at the table, because what we know is that

00:25:25.609 --> 00:25:28.190
addiction often develops from the context of

00:25:28.190 --> 00:25:31.789
stress and trauma and social disadvantage. and

00:25:31.789 --> 00:25:35.589
that those struggles have a ripple effect outward

00:25:35.589 --> 00:25:39.730
and put strain onto families and communities,

00:25:40.049 --> 00:25:42.690
healthcare systems, justice systems, and they're

00:25:42.690 --> 00:25:45.769
expensive. Addiction's tied to so many layers

00:25:45.769 --> 00:25:50.009
of human experience. And so prevention and treatment

00:25:50.009 --> 00:25:52.990
has to be holistic for it to be effective. And

00:25:52.990 --> 00:25:56.269
so I think that what I appreciate about our opportunities

00:25:56.269 --> 00:25:59.730
to engage in this educationally is that if we

00:25:59.730 --> 00:26:03.130
could just provide somebody a pill or you know

00:26:03.130 --> 00:26:07.210
address one factor. with addiction and be successful

00:26:07.210 --> 00:26:10.069
in that way, we would do it. But it's not effective,

00:26:10.069 --> 00:26:12.670
unfortunately, for enough people. And so really,

00:26:12.829 --> 00:26:16.369
we have to really look at the systemic factors

00:26:16.369 --> 00:26:20.490
that are impacting recovery. Olivia, what's something

00:26:20.490 --> 00:26:22.589
that you feel like you would like to help people

00:26:22.589 --> 00:26:25.809
understand better that you think is a misunderstanding?

00:26:26.309 --> 00:26:29.630
I think my take on is I really appreciate this

00:26:29.630 --> 00:26:32.730
question as well. And I think my thought is similar

00:26:32.730 --> 00:26:37.490
to Jen. one on earth was born with a glass of

00:26:37.490 --> 00:26:40.670
beer in their hand. It's all addiction problem

00:26:40.670 --> 00:26:43.890
and everything. No one really, literally is born

00:26:43.890 --> 00:26:47.099
that way. that all the addiction issues and struggles

00:26:47.099 --> 00:26:50.940
that we see among the people, that happens because

00:26:50.940 --> 00:26:54.000
something happened, like something, some other

00:26:54.000 --> 00:26:56.900
external factor, not because they're morally

00:26:56.900 --> 00:27:00.859
wrong. So having that perception that it's not

00:27:00.859 --> 00:27:03.599
like individual problem, they can fix it and

00:27:03.599 --> 00:27:05.539
you got to like, you know, like tough it up.

00:27:05.839 --> 00:27:08.220
It's not like that. It's really complicated.

00:27:08.859 --> 00:27:11.400
The social determinants side of an addiction

00:27:11.400 --> 00:27:13.480
problem, we've got to pay attention to that one

00:27:13.480 --> 00:27:17.440
a lot. The other one is that prevention. Like

00:27:17.440 --> 00:27:19.900
addiction problem, we talk about today, like

00:27:19.900 --> 00:27:22.460
Jen and I and Eric, all three of us talk about

00:27:22.460 --> 00:27:26.440
specifically addiction problem. But before substance

00:27:26.440 --> 00:27:29.799
use problem happening, there is other precursors.

00:27:30.019 --> 00:27:32.660
So we can intervene. though, like for example,

00:27:32.880 --> 00:27:35.440
exercise and behavior issue, which is happening

00:27:35.440 --> 00:27:38.500
a lot before the substance is a problem. That

00:27:38.500 --> 00:27:41.460
one is happening a lot earlier. And we had I

00:27:41.460 --> 00:27:44.400
had some studies looking at the children's exercise

00:27:44.400 --> 00:27:47.940
and behavior problem from age 2 .5. So that like

00:27:47.940 --> 00:27:50.700
that kind of prevention idea, we got to have

00:27:50.700 --> 00:27:53.720
that one in our mind as well. So balance between

00:27:53.720 --> 00:27:56.720
prevention and treatment. And the other is the

00:27:56.720 --> 00:28:00.190
social determinants. of addiction problem, not

00:28:00.190 --> 00:28:03.490
putting all the blame to an individual who are

00:28:03.490 --> 00:28:06.069
currently struggling and need help. Right. No,

00:28:06.210 --> 00:28:09.069
that's great. This is such a complex issue and

00:28:09.069 --> 00:28:13.420
one that covers a huge span of disciplines. We

00:28:13.420 --> 00:28:15.460
haven't, as you just said, Olivia, we haven't

00:28:15.460 --> 00:28:17.400
even really gotten into talking about prevention.

00:28:17.519 --> 00:28:20.380
It's mostly been about treatment so far. So I

00:28:20.380 --> 00:28:22.980
hope that you will come back, tons more for us

00:28:22.980 --> 00:28:25.819
to dive into. But before we go, I just wanna

00:28:25.819 --> 00:28:28.099
give you each a chance if there's any parting

00:28:28.099 --> 00:28:30.299
thoughts that you have that you haven't had a

00:28:30.299 --> 00:28:32.539
chance to share that you'd like to share about

00:28:32.539 --> 00:28:35.220
your work. Jen, maybe you can go first and then

00:28:35.220 --> 00:28:37.079
Olivia, you can close us out. Is there anything

00:28:37.079 --> 00:28:40.500
that you'd like to share, Jen? for the opportunity

00:28:40.500 --> 00:28:43.519
that I've had to participate in some of this.

00:28:44.339 --> 00:28:47.440
I think certainly I wasn't, I didn't start out

00:28:47.440 --> 00:28:51.099
as a addiction curriculum developer by any means,

00:28:51.359 --> 00:28:55.140
but I think or in any way, you know, I'm a social

00:28:55.140 --> 00:28:58.400
worker as well and have been doing direct practice.

00:28:58.420 --> 00:29:01.940
And I think it's been really exciting to address

00:29:01.940 --> 00:29:05.740
areas in innovative ways that sometimes academics

00:29:05.740 --> 00:29:07.980
don't get to do. And so it's just been really

00:29:07.980 --> 00:29:11.099
fun. And I'm very grateful for the opportunity

00:29:11.099 --> 00:29:13.400
and the students who have been able to participate

00:29:13.400 --> 00:29:15.920
and be engaged and learn something new as well.

00:29:15.920 --> 00:29:18.799
So I'm hoping that we'll be able to continue

00:29:18.799 --> 00:29:21.380
this type of work and really start to measure

00:29:21.380 --> 00:29:24.380
the impact that we're having. And other universities

00:29:24.380 --> 00:29:27.099
will be able to replicate the model. Very cool.

00:29:27.200 --> 00:29:29.700
Very cool. Olivia, some parting thoughts for

00:29:29.700 --> 00:29:32.059
our listeners? They usually start not really

00:29:32.059 --> 00:29:34.640
and have something to say. Perfect. That's what

00:29:34.640 --> 00:29:41.900
we're looking for. I really appreciate this opportunity

00:29:41.900 --> 00:29:45.119
to talk about and it actually helps me to think

00:29:45.119 --> 00:29:49.220
about my own work and my collaboration with the

00:29:49.220 --> 00:29:53.400
folks and everything. I guess I got to come back

00:29:53.400 --> 00:29:56.559
to the main point that I was trying to come across

00:29:56.559 --> 00:29:58.759
throughout the whole hour conversation today

00:29:58.759 --> 00:30:01.990
is that Addiction is a really, really complicated

00:30:01.990 --> 00:30:05.529
problem. We need everyone's help and everyone's

00:30:05.529 --> 00:30:09.750
intellectual capacity so that we can solve this

00:30:09.750 --> 00:30:14.890
problem. And it will be really incredible someday.

00:30:15.369 --> 00:30:19.450
we can say I can say that I contributed at least

00:30:19.450 --> 00:30:23.170
a point or one percent of that additional problem

00:30:23.170 --> 00:30:25.890
down the road and we can talk about that one

00:30:25.890 --> 00:30:28.470
at some point without without my colleagues and

00:30:28.470 --> 00:30:31.089
whole kind of thing at the end we can say we

00:30:31.089 --> 00:30:33.710
did something together to solve problem even

00:30:33.710 --> 00:30:37.700
if It was not a 90%, but we did something together.

00:30:37.819 --> 00:30:40.140
That's beautiful. And I think there's probably

00:30:40.140 --> 00:30:43.259
no doubt in at least my mind that the work that

00:30:43.259 --> 00:30:47.799
you are both doing will be more than a 0 .0001

00:30:47.799 --> 00:30:50.980
% contribution to this massive problem. And it

00:30:50.980 --> 00:30:54.180
is such a big problem. And it's great to see

00:30:54.180 --> 00:30:56.519
people from our school being so heavily involved

00:30:56.519 --> 00:30:59.299
in the education and research aspects of trying

00:30:59.299 --> 00:31:02.519
to help. Our society deal with such a major problem

00:31:02.519 --> 00:31:06.119
that addiction is. So thank you both to Jen and

00:31:06.119 --> 00:31:08.920
Olivia for joining us today. If you, the listener,

00:31:08.960 --> 00:31:11.960
want to learn more about the USC Institute for

00:31:11.960 --> 00:31:14.279
Addiction Science or the Master of Addiction

00:31:14.279 --> 00:31:17.099
Science program, you can visit our school's website

00:31:17.099 --> 00:31:21.579
at dwarracpeck .usc .edu. And if you have questions

00:31:21.579 --> 00:31:24.160
for our guests on the show or you want to support

00:31:24.160 --> 00:31:27.000
our transformative research and education programs,

00:31:27.339 --> 00:31:30.619
you can email us at listenup .edu. people at

00:31:30.619 --> 00:31:34.339
usc .edu. And Jen, Olivia, thank you both again

00:31:34.339 --> 00:31:37.259
for joining me today. And thanks again for doing

00:31:37.259 --> 00:31:39.559
such wonderful work in the world. Thank you for

00:31:39.559 --> 00:31:41.640
having me. Thank you, Eric. Appreciate it.
