WEBVTT

00:00:13.580 --> 00:00:16.460
Hello and welcome to Listen Up People, a podcast

00:00:16.460 --> 00:00:19.399
of the USC Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social

00:00:19.399 --> 00:00:22.399
Work. I'm Dr. Eric Rice, professor and associate

00:00:22.399 --> 00:00:25.719
dean for research. The impact of artificial intelligence

00:00:25.719 --> 00:00:29.320
has exploded in recent years. Intellectual leaders

00:00:29.320 --> 00:00:31.879
from the technology space like Bill Gates have

00:00:31.879 --> 00:00:35.420
said, I quote, AI will lead to breakthrough treatments

00:00:35.420 --> 00:00:38.420
for deadly diseases, innovative solutions for

00:00:38.420 --> 00:00:40.740
climate change, and high quality education for

00:00:40.740 --> 00:00:43.840
everyone. Not everyone agrees with him. Intellectuals

00:00:43.840 --> 00:00:47.100
like Uval Noah Harari has said, quote, for the

00:00:47.100 --> 00:00:49.799
first time, we have real competition on the planet.

00:00:49.920 --> 00:00:52.460
We have been the most intelligent species by

00:00:52.460 --> 00:00:55.679
far for tens of thousands of years. And now we

00:00:55.679 --> 00:00:57.700
are creating something that can compete with

00:00:57.700 --> 00:01:00.509
us in the very near future. So my guests today

00:01:00.509 --> 00:01:02.429
are at the center of this space and the center

00:01:02.429 --> 00:01:05.989
of this debate. They are working with AI to improve

00:01:05.989 --> 00:01:08.549
health and well -being, yet they are deeply concerned

00:01:08.549 --> 00:01:11.170
about the role that AI will have in our workplace

00:01:11.170 --> 00:01:13.430
and in our daily lives. So I'd like to welcome

00:01:13.430 --> 00:01:16.510
my guests today, Dr. John Oberg, a USC School

00:01:16.510 --> 00:01:19.629
of Social Work DSW alumni, who is founder and

00:01:19.629 --> 00:01:23.420
CEO of Precina Health, and Josiah Bryan. who

00:01:23.420 --> 00:01:26.620
is the Chief Technology Officer and Lead AI Researcher

00:01:26.620 --> 00:01:28.680
at Precina Health. It's great to have you both

00:01:28.680 --> 00:01:30.260
here. Yeah, thanks, Eric. Thanks for having us.

00:01:30.280 --> 00:01:32.739
We're really excited to be here. So John, I know

00:01:32.739 --> 00:01:35.579
you got a doctorate degree here. I was here to

00:01:35.579 --> 00:01:37.700
see it happen. So of all the places you could

00:01:37.700 --> 00:01:40.019
have gone, why did you decide to pursue a doctorate

00:01:40.019 --> 00:01:42.939
here at USC? My grandfather taught at USC. My

00:01:42.939 --> 00:01:45.959
mom went to USC as an undergrad. I was there

00:01:45.959 --> 00:01:49.670
as an undergrad. and then it was really the natural

00:01:49.670 --> 00:01:53.069
place to come home. My undergrad degree, I left

00:01:53.069 --> 00:01:54.670
after a couple of years and finished up at New

00:01:54.670 --> 00:01:57.069
Mexico, and I told people I'd be back to finish

00:01:57.069 --> 00:01:58.870
my degree. I didn't finish my undergrad degree

00:01:58.870 --> 00:02:00.489
at USC, but I did come back when it was time

00:02:00.489 --> 00:02:04.329
to get a doctorate. Nice. Why the DSW program?

00:02:04.519 --> 00:02:07.000
I think that social workers are really misunderstood

00:02:07.000 --> 00:02:09.000
in the world. I think people think about social

00:02:09.000 --> 00:02:10.460
work and whatever experience they've had with

00:02:10.460 --> 00:02:12.560
them, whether it's CPS or medical social work

00:02:12.560 --> 00:02:14.819
or whatever experience someone's had, they just

00:02:14.819 --> 00:02:16.699
kind of put social workers into that bucket.

00:02:16.719 --> 00:02:19.080
And that's not how I saw social work. I saw social

00:02:19.080 --> 00:02:21.699
work as the people that use systems thinking

00:02:21.699 --> 00:02:24.719
to draw the really big picture and connect it

00:02:24.719 --> 00:02:26.680
to the micro level. So in social work, we call

00:02:26.680 --> 00:02:28.860
that the macro level, the meso level or the micro

00:02:28.860 --> 00:02:33.599
level. But I think most disciplines don't so

00:02:33.599 --> 00:02:36.240
deliberate. connect the individual to the system

00:02:36.240 --> 00:02:38.180
with the community in the middle. And I think

00:02:38.180 --> 00:02:40.020
that's such an important framework for us as

00:02:40.020 --> 00:02:43.270
we deal with these really complicated problems

00:02:43.270 --> 00:02:46.310
that seem intractable, but they're not intractable

00:02:46.310 --> 00:02:48.770
problems when you can actually get your mental

00:02:48.770 --> 00:02:51.830
model around how the system plays with the community,

00:02:51.830 --> 00:02:53.789
plays with the individual. And that's a really

00:02:53.789 --> 00:02:56.370
important part of how we've actually impacted

00:02:56.370 --> 00:02:58.490
type two diabetes. Like our first research project

00:02:58.490 --> 00:03:01.030
during our doctorate, you know, 98 % success

00:03:01.030 --> 00:03:03.090
in reversing type two diabetes. I'll share with

00:03:03.090 --> 00:03:05.009
you later in the podcast, some of our more recent

00:03:05.009 --> 00:03:08.229
research, but it's because we're able to look

00:03:08.229 --> 00:03:10.590
at that systems thinking and that social workers

00:03:10.590 --> 00:03:14.430
have this amazing view of the broad world and

00:03:14.430 --> 00:03:16.150
how it plays with the community and how it plays

00:03:16.150 --> 00:03:18.069
with the individual. I really felt it was the

00:03:18.069 --> 00:03:20.409
right place to go and then take the research

00:03:20.409 --> 00:03:22.210
and apply it in a way that was really meaningful

00:03:22.210 --> 00:03:23.949
in the world. And, you know, I think all of our

00:03:23.949 --> 00:03:26.169
clinical results are speaking to that. Yeah.

00:03:26.270 --> 00:03:28.969
I mean, it goes without saying I'm a huge social

00:03:28.969 --> 00:03:32.169
work fan as well. I wouldn't be here doing this

00:03:32.169 --> 00:03:35.469
if I wasn't, but it's great to hear the value

00:03:35.469 --> 00:03:38.270
you place on this. Josiah, I want to ask you,

00:03:38.569 --> 00:03:41.520
I know you're a tech guy. How did you first get

00:03:41.520 --> 00:03:44.560
involved in AI research? I've always been fascinated

00:03:44.560 --> 00:03:47.560
with the way the computers have the ability to

00:03:47.560 --> 00:03:50.099
make our lives better and make our lives easier.

00:03:50.479 --> 00:03:52.919
I've inherently very lazy. I started working

00:03:52.919 --> 00:03:55.460
with my hands, taking apart radios, my dad's

00:03:55.460 --> 00:03:58.060
old reel to reel player. Then when I discovered

00:03:58.060 --> 00:04:01.639
that I could be creative with computers, I found

00:04:01.639 --> 00:04:03.860
that I didn't want to do the hardware thinking

00:04:03.860 --> 00:04:06.340
anymore. I wanted to work with software. And

00:04:06.340 --> 00:04:08.460
very early on when I was about 12 years old,

00:04:08.500 --> 00:04:10.340
my dad started taking me to the library and I

00:04:10.340 --> 00:04:12.240
started reading graciously all the books I could.

00:04:12.689 --> 00:04:16.209
One of them stood out to me was this book, I

00:04:16.209 --> 00:04:17.269
haven't been able to find anymore, it's called

00:04:17.269 --> 00:04:19.250
Sierra Circuit Cellar. In it, it had an article,

00:04:19.370 --> 00:04:21.490
teach computers to think for themselves. Really,

00:04:21.670 --> 00:04:24.290
it was just this, pick from a menu what you want

00:04:24.290 --> 00:04:26.110
the computer to do and we'll paste together,

00:04:26.250 --> 00:04:27.889
think it's a basic code and we'll do its thing.

00:04:28.430 --> 00:04:29.970
But ever since then, that sparked something in

00:04:29.970 --> 00:04:31.850
me at 12 years old thinking, wow, I can get my

00:04:31.850 --> 00:04:33.870
computer to help make my life better with a little

00:04:33.870 --> 00:04:35.990
bit of intelligence and think intelligently.

00:04:36.220 --> 00:04:38.600
And that's put me on this lifelong trajectory

00:04:38.600 --> 00:04:41.680
of learning about AI, experimenting with it,

00:04:41.779 --> 00:04:44.240
trying to find ways to integrate it into my life,

00:04:44.600 --> 00:04:48.019
and to make human lives better, connect us more

00:04:48.019 --> 00:04:50.779
deeply as humans while still enjoying learning

00:04:50.779 --> 00:04:53.879
about what makes us truly human so I can make

00:04:53.879 --> 00:04:57.500
AI better. I am very, very sympathetic to this

00:04:57.500 --> 00:05:00.560
perspective. I think... Some of the listeners

00:05:00.560 --> 00:05:02.779
that we have may know this, but some of them

00:05:02.779 --> 00:05:05.500
who are turning in to listen to the two of you

00:05:05.500 --> 00:05:07.379
may not know this. I started a center called

00:05:07.379 --> 00:05:10.319
the USC Center for AI and Society back in 2016.

00:05:10.800 --> 00:05:13.600
And like John, I'm really convinced that really

00:05:13.600 --> 00:05:17.259
good social work -driven systemic thinking about

00:05:17.259 --> 00:05:20.779
complex problems can help us to come up with

00:05:20.779 --> 00:05:24.310
real solutions. But like you, Josiah, I really

00:05:24.310 --> 00:05:28.449
think that AI is this incredible opportunity

00:05:28.449 --> 00:05:32.069
for building tools that can be as maybe complex

00:05:32.069 --> 00:05:35.250
as the problems that we're dealing with and have

00:05:35.250 --> 00:05:37.329
some real opportunities to move the needle on

00:05:37.329 --> 00:05:39.470
some stuff that we've had trouble moving the

00:05:39.470 --> 00:05:42.470
needle on. And so I guess with that in mind,

00:05:42.629 --> 00:05:46.149
I'll let the spotlight go back to the two of

00:05:46.149 --> 00:05:48.290
you, which is to say, John, you know, maybe you

00:05:48.290 --> 00:05:50.230
could just give us an overview of Christina Health

00:05:50.230 --> 00:05:52.769
and what are the goals? of the company and what

00:05:52.769 --> 00:05:54.850
kind of work are you doing there? Yeah, we're

00:05:54.850 --> 00:05:56.810
a medical practice. So it's, you know, you bring

00:05:56.810 --> 00:05:59.470
on two guys, you know, my master's degree is

00:05:59.470 --> 00:06:02.410
in policy. And then I have a second specialization

00:06:02.410 --> 00:06:04.389
in the management of technology where we researched,

00:06:04.389 --> 00:06:06.629
you know, the history of technology and what's

00:06:06.629 --> 00:06:08.529
happened in terms of pace and speed. That was

00:06:08.529 --> 00:06:10.949
one of my capstone projects there. But we opened

00:06:10.949 --> 00:06:12.790
up a medical practice because you've got this

00:06:12.790 --> 00:06:15.370
really nasty problem with type two diabetes that

00:06:15.370 --> 00:06:16.910
started with my mother -in -law getting sick,

00:06:17.350 --> 00:06:19.730
ended up in the hospital. And I got really frustrated

00:06:19.730 --> 00:06:22.990
that she was in the hospital in my mind unnecessarily

00:06:22.990 --> 00:06:25.129
if she had just taken the medication the right

00:06:25.129 --> 00:06:27.889
way. I've met her doctor. I have the highest

00:06:27.889 --> 00:06:30.290
respect for her doctor. She's an amazing primary

00:06:30.290 --> 00:06:33.350
care physician. And so I called my friends at

00:06:33.350 --> 00:06:34.889
USC basically and said, I'm coming back to get

00:06:34.889 --> 00:06:37.029
my doctorate. I want to solve type two diabetes.

00:06:37.490 --> 00:06:39.949
And I think the nicest way to say it is that

00:06:39.949 --> 00:06:41.589
the people at USC kind of patted me on the head

00:06:41.589 --> 00:06:43.740
and said, hey, We've been dealing with diabetes

00:06:43.740 --> 00:06:46.600
for the last 60 years as a world, and we haven't

00:06:46.600 --> 00:06:48.860
solved it. That's cute. Come on back. We'll take

00:06:48.860 --> 00:06:51.060
your tuition money. We'll educate you. But I

00:06:51.060 --> 00:06:52.139
don't know if you're going to solve the problem.

00:06:52.329 --> 00:06:54.790
And so in our first pilot study, we took 50 patients

00:06:54.790 --> 00:06:58.149
who were super sick, average A1C of 9 .6 if you're

00:06:58.149 --> 00:07:01.149
a clinician, and we reduced that average A1C

00:07:01.149 --> 00:07:04.589
to 6 .4 in 12 weeks. And so most doctors would

00:07:04.589 --> 00:07:06.689
tell you if you can reduce A1C by one percentage

00:07:06.689 --> 00:07:08.589
point in a year, you have a billion dollar drug.

00:07:08.970 --> 00:07:11.029
And using just a different set of behavioral

00:07:11.029 --> 00:07:13.889
interventions, medical interventions, using devices,

00:07:14.170 --> 00:07:16.449
pharmacology, but also most importantly, behavior

00:07:16.449 --> 00:07:19.889
change, we reduced people's A1C by 3 .2 % in

00:07:19.889 --> 00:07:22.120
12 weeks, which is super impressive. But then

00:07:22.120 --> 00:07:24.459
we kept people in clinical control for the next

00:07:24.459 --> 00:07:27.980
two years in 83 % of our cases. And I think people

00:07:27.980 --> 00:07:30.160
were just, their jaws hit the ground. How did

00:07:30.160 --> 00:07:32.680
you do that with this group that was low income?

00:07:33.060 --> 00:07:35.759
They had low access to care. And most providers

00:07:35.759 --> 00:07:37.500
who had worked with them said they've had uncontrolled

00:07:37.500 --> 00:07:39.899
diabetes for years. And some doctors were calling

00:07:39.899 --> 00:07:43.720
these patients lazy or uneducated. It was really

00:07:43.720 --> 00:07:46.120
judgmental and it was horrifying for us to see.

00:07:46.240 --> 00:07:48.879
And so we said no. it's not the right, it wasn't

00:07:48.879 --> 00:07:50.639
the right intervention. So we stripped down the

00:07:50.639 --> 00:07:53.360
medical practice to kind of its most basic units

00:07:53.360 --> 00:07:55.959
of clinical intervention, of administration.

00:07:56.480 --> 00:07:58.620
We really took apart the, like including the

00:07:58.620 --> 00:08:00.540
paperwork you sign when you walk in, like everything

00:08:00.540 --> 00:08:03.199
got ripped apart. And we created what we call

00:08:03.199 --> 00:08:05.889
the systemic. therapeutic alignment and rapid

00:08:05.889 --> 00:08:08.449
titration model that looks at all of the medicine,

00:08:08.790 --> 00:08:11.149
all of the mental health issues, all of the behavioral

00:08:11.149 --> 00:08:13.689
non -clinical issues, all the social determinants

00:08:13.689 --> 00:08:15.949
of health, all of the health beliefs. But then

00:08:15.949 --> 00:08:18.810
we layer across a patient's readiness for change.

00:08:19.290 --> 00:08:21.970
And then we make these really, really, really

00:08:21.970 --> 00:08:24.569
small steps to help patients get better a little

00:08:24.569 --> 00:08:27.250
bit at a time. And we use AI to do things like

00:08:27.250 --> 00:08:30.670
taking in thousands of patients, you know, pages

00:08:30.670 --> 00:08:33.269
of patient charting, and then highlighting for

00:08:33.269 --> 00:08:35.830
the physician, like which ones are most important

00:08:35.830 --> 00:08:38.429
so that our physicians can do crazy things like

00:08:38.429 --> 00:08:40.750
reading the chart before they meet with a patient.

00:08:41.169 --> 00:08:42.809
And I think a lot of, you know, providers want

00:08:42.809 --> 00:08:44.750
to do that. But when you have a thousand pages

00:08:44.750 --> 00:08:47.049
of history, and I'm being literal, I'm not figurative

00:08:47.049 --> 00:08:50.629
in some cases, right? So we can use AI to do

00:08:50.629 --> 00:08:52.690
that. We can use AI for things that I would call

00:08:52.690 --> 00:08:54.830
fairly vanilla, like dictation and all those

00:08:54.830 --> 00:08:56.690
types of things. Sure. More importantly, we can

00:08:56.690 --> 00:08:59.529
take 1 ,000 pages of history for 20 years, and

00:08:59.529 --> 00:09:01.769
we can find patterns where it says to the provider,

00:09:01.990 --> 00:09:04.389
hey, have you considered looking at this issue

00:09:04.389 --> 00:09:07.269
that shows up like arthroscorosis, but actually...

00:09:07.070 --> 00:09:09.830
over in this system hasn't been identified, does

00:09:09.830 --> 00:09:13.029
that require a lab draw or not? Or, hey, in this

00:09:13.029 --> 00:09:15.070
case, they've been pulled off of this particular

00:09:15.070 --> 00:09:18.070
drug, and SGLT2 is one that was recent, and it's

00:09:18.070 --> 00:09:19.750
actually no longer clinically indicated they

00:09:19.750 --> 00:09:21.590
get pulled off. They should actually be put on

00:09:21.590 --> 00:09:23.690
and actually have as much as they can of that

00:09:23.690 --> 00:09:26.320
drug, and that... guidance is only four weeks

00:09:26.320 --> 00:09:29.200
old. And then what we can do is say, hey, this

00:09:29.200 --> 00:09:31.940
doctor wants to see the data in this way externally.

00:09:32.379 --> 00:09:34.919
This other external wants to see the data a different

00:09:34.919 --> 00:09:37.460
way. Can we use AI to format exactly the way

00:09:37.460 --> 00:09:39.820
they want, review it and send it out in a way

00:09:39.820 --> 00:09:42.549
that's not administratively burdensome? And so

00:09:42.549 --> 00:09:44.990
we use AI and Josiah, correct me if I'm wrong,

00:09:45.169 --> 00:09:47.830
12 or 13 different discrete places in our medical

00:09:47.830 --> 00:09:50.049
practice without being a tech company. My next

00:09:50.049 --> 00:09:52.529
question to Josiah is like, John's described

00:09:52.529 --> 00:09:56.250
a bunch of applications of AI. What are you doing

00:09:56.250 --> 00:09:58.950
with AI? to make all this stuff, this amazing

00:09:58.950 --> 00:10:01.929
stuff happen. We've put our trust in a platform

00:10:01.929 --> 00:10:04.049
called Salesforce. It's a small little company.

00:10:04.190 --> 00:10:05.830
I'm sure you might've heard of it, but they've

00:10:05.830 --> 00:10:07.889
done a great job. They've done a great job making

00:10:07.889 --> 00:10:11.090
it so that I can move faster by putting my trust

00:10:11.090 --> 00:10:13.610
in the, keeping my data there and then building

00:10:13.610 --> 00:10:16.009
on top of their platform. to that end there,

00:10:16.230 --> 00:10:17.889
there's some things that they're incredibly good

00:10:17.889 --> 00:10:19.789
at and some things that they just aren't going

00:10:19.789 --> 00:10:21.610
to focus on because that doesn't make sense for

00:10:21.610 --> 00:10:24.470
their market. And so we build into their platform

00:10:24.470 --> 00:10:26.889
and provide our providers with things like a

00:10:26.889 --> 00:10:29.200
provider coach. to help them reset emotionally

00:10:29.200 --> 00:10:31.899
between calls and to coach them up in Prasena

00:10:31.899 --> 00:10:34.960
way of thinking. And it all is oriented around

00:10:34.960 --> 00:10:38.460
adding in emotional context, adding in wisdom

00:10:38.460 --> 00:10:42.059
in some form or fashion into the AI systems that

00:10:42.059 --> 00:10:44.600
we deploy into our practice. That's the provider

00:10:44.600 --> 00:10:47.779
facing one. We're currently in beta testing with

00:10:47.779 --> 00:10:51.139
a patient facing AI, which will enable them to

00:10:51.139 --> 00:10:53.659
advocate for themselves and to know what questions

00:10:53.659 --> 00:10:56.299
to ask their doctors for that Prasena, as well

00:10:56.299 --> 00:10:58.259
as their other health. care providers. So those

00:10:58.259 --> 00:11:01.059
are two of the AIs out of a large plethora of

00:11:01.059 --> 00:11:03.240
AIs that we have deployed. Some are more boring

00:11:03.240 --> 00:11:06.519
behind the scenes, such as the document filtration

00:11:06.519 --> 00:11:09.639
AI, which is a workflow that goes through, takes

00:11:09.639 --> 00:11:12.080
in and process the documents for our providers.

00:11:12.360 --> 00:11:14.559
It lifts the load off of the human providers.

00:11:14.740 --> 00:11:17.019
There's a number of agents like that behind the

00:11:17.019 --> 00:11:19.820
scenes that help us accelerate and deliver more

00:11:19.820 --> 00:11:23.379
human care at a lower cost and save more lives

00:11:23.379 --> 00:11:25.879
and save and help more people. I want to make

00:11:25.879 --> 00:11:28.279
it real for the listeners. So two really, really

00:11:28.279 --> 00:11:32.360
use cases. We've essentially taken doctors and

00:11:32.360 --> 00:11:34.120
nurse practitioners and physicians associates

00:11:34.120 --> 00:11:36.039
and said, hey, look, you've got to learn an entirely

00:11:36.039 --> 00:11:37.639
different way of doing medicine if you're going

00:11:37.639 --> 00:11:40.259
to work with us, similar to a fellowship in terms

00:11:40.259 --> 00:11:44.100
of the level of training that we give. And the

00:11:44.100 --> 00:11:46.080
medical doctor, my partner, Dr. Dustin Williams

00:11:46.080 --> 00:11:48.100
is a long -term medical educator, has written

00:11:48.100 --> 00:11:50.899
medical curriculum for 80 different medical schools

00:11:50.899 --> 00:11:53.120
across the world. So we know that we're asking

00:11:53.120 --> 00:11:54.940
a lot of a provider to come in and work with

00:11:54.940 --> 00:11:56.679
us, very similar to what he asked fellows to

00:11:56.679 --> 00:11:58.960
do when he was training fellows. And so the AI

00:11:58.960 --> 00:12:01.759
will actively help support us to deliver that

00:12:01.759 --> 00:12:04.879
training in a lower cost way by having our providers

00:12:04.879 --> 00:12:07.740
actually practice what we want them to say with

00:12:07.740 --> 00:12:10.820
the patient, because it's so nuanced and the

00:12:10.820 --> 00:12:13.039
AI never gets tired. So if somebody wants to

00:12:13.039 --> 00:12:15.820
practice 20 times before work, they can do that

00:12:15.820 --> 00:12:18.299
any hour of the day, the AI gives that feedback

00:12:18.299 --> 00:12:20.740
to the provider. And if the provider wants to

00:12:20.740 --> 00:12:22.440
share that with their manager, the manager can

00:12:22.440 --> 00:12:25.059
come in and be even more new. So that's a really

00:12:25.059 --> 00:12:27.600
helpful tool. On the flip side of that coin,

00:12:27.919 --> 00:12:30.259
if a patient says to their provider, I know I

00:12:30.259 --> 00:12:32.440
need to eat better, but I need a meal plan. It

00:12:32.440 --> 00:12:34.779
used to take hours to create a meal plan. In

00:12:34.779 --> 00:12:36.639
five or 10 minutes, our providers can talk to

00:12:36.639 --> 00:12:39.500
a patient. in the video chat, create a meal plan,

00:12:40.320 --> 00:12:42.840
and feed into the AI what food is in the patient's

00:12:42.840 --> 00:12:44.940
house today, ask what the shopping list should

00:12:44.940 --> 00:12:47.480
be based on the size of the family and how many

00:12:47.480 --> 00:12:49.559
times that person wants to eat the same leftovers,

00:12:50.019 --> 00:12:51.879
based on their own preferences for food, their

00:12:51.879 --> 00:12:54.759
own allergies, the actual store that's nearby,

00:12:55.299 --> 00:12:57.320
and Josiah has told me that very shortly we'll

00:12:57.320 --> 00:12:58.960
be able to wire it up so we can actually send

00:12:58.960 --> 00:13:01.639
that shopping list to that store for the patient

00:13:01.639 --> 00:13:03.340
and have them just pick it up at the curb if

00:13:03.340 --> 00:13:05.490
they want to. And that's all taking like five

00:13:05.490 --> 00:13:07.710
minutes now with a well -trained provider versus

00:13:07.710 --> 00:13:09.889
the hours of time it would take, or it just not

00:13:09.889 --> 00:13:12.049
getting done at all and the patient not following

00:13:12.049 --> 00:13:14.029
the plan because it's just too hard to follow

00:13:14.029 --> 00:13:17.309
the plan. Very, very small movements sometimes

00:13:17.309 --> 00:13:19.049
require a lot of planning. Well, yeah, I mean,

00:13:19.049 --> 00:13:22.809
making a plan seems like not a hard thing to

00:13:22.809 --> 00:13:26.169
do when you are the person who is instructing

00:13:26.169 --> 00:13:28.970
somebody else on the plan. Enacting a plan when

00:13:28.970 --> 00:13:30.750
it creates, you know, all of them, there's all

00:13:30.750 --> 00:13:32.929
these logistic barriers in real life is really

00:13:32.929 --> 00:13:35.049
hard. I mean, that makes perfect sense to me.

00:13:35.289 --> 00:13:36.889
And I gotta say, Josiah, you'd said something

00:13:36.889 --> 00:13:40.070
that I just wanna throw my two cents on, which

00:13:40.070 --> 00:13:41.950
is, you'd said, oh, well, there's some of this

00:13:41.950 --> 00:13:45.029
stuff that's not that exciting, that's the background

00:13:45.029 --> 00:13:48.370
thing that is digesting all of these thousands

00:13:48.370 --> 00:13:51.350
of pages of information. I actually think that

00:13:51.350 --> 00:13:54.690
that stuff is incredibly exciting. I mean, it

00:13:54.690 --> 00:13:57.269
doesn't sound sexy, right? I think sometimes,

00:13:57.269 --> 00:14:00.590
you know, AIs that talk back to you or that allow

00:14:00.590 --> 00:14:04.169
you to talk to them sound in some ways more like

00:14:04.169 --> 00:14:06.169
the science fiction robots that we envisioned

00:14:06.169 --> 00:14:09.370
when we were kids. But the fact that a real human

00:14:09.370 --> 00:14:13.669
being doesn't have the time. to read 1 ,000 pages

00:14:13.669 --> 00:14:17.009
of patient notes. But an AI might be able to

00:14:17.009 --> 00:14:20.009
digest some of those patient notes for that provider

00:14:20.009 --> 00:14:23.610
and put in front of that provider some possible

00:14:23.610 --> 00:14:27.070
things to think about that then doesn't replace

00:14:27.070 --> 00:14:29.230
the provider as the provider, but just makes

00:14:29.230 --> 00:14:31.649
the provider better. at what the provider does.

00:14:32.529 --> 00:14:35.549
That's so exciting. I mean, it's hard to, I mean,

00:14:35.549 --> 00:14:37.490
you know, it takes 30 seconds to explain it.

00:14:37.509 --> 00:14:39.450
So it's not, it doesn't, it's not pithy in the

00:14:39.450 --> 00:14:42.350
same way, but that's a game changer, right? It

00:14:42.350 --> 00:14:45.370
is. It helps us be connect better as humans.

00:14:45.730 --> 00:14:47.470
I think with some of the AI we've done with Dustin,

00:14:47.750 --> 00:14:50.470
he said it takes his work, his prep time down

00:14:50.470 --> 00:14:53.590
from 45 minutes to 15 minutes, but it enables

00:14:53.590 --> 00:14:55.909
him that 45 minutes he gets back, he can then

00:14:55.909 --> 00:14:58.799
invest that with the patient. Dustin's been doing

00:14:58.799 --> 00:15:02.360
this for years. So that's 45 to 15 for a world

00:15:02.360 --> 00:15:04.220
-class expert at the person that designed the

00:15:04.220 --> 00:15:07.139
protocols. For other people, it's 90 minutes

00:15:07.139 --> 00:15:12.720
to 15 minutes. It would be hard to overstate

00:15:12.720 --> 00:15:15.379
the impact, but it's also hard to overstate the

00:15:15.379 --> 00:15:18.340
importance of the human in the loop because,

00:15:19.139 --> 00:15:21.639
again, let me use a real example. When Josiah

00:15:21.639 --> 00:15:25.019
uses AI to code, he's a domain expert and knows

00:15:25.019 --> 00:15:28.120
exactly how to use AI to help us move faster

00:15:28.120 --> 00:15:31.720
in burning down our backlog. Amazing. If I were

00:15:31.720 --> 00:15:34.659
to try to use AI to code, not a domain expert,

00:15:34.919 --> 00:15:38.580
I would create additional work for quality assurance

00:15:38.580 --> 00:15:41.299
from Josiah that would likely be faster for him

00:15:41.299 --> 00:15:43.340
just to do the work himself than trying to oversee

00:15:43.340 --> 00:15:47.809
the garbage I would create. Right, so technology

00:15:47.809 --> 00:15:50.190
solves big problems or it can create big problems

00:15:50.190 --> 00:15:52.629
too, right? So a car can get you from A to B

00:15:52.629 --> 00:15:53.850
really quickly, but if you don't know how to

00:15:53.850 --> 00:15:56.730
drive, it can cause an 18 car pileup too. 100%.

00:15:56.730 --> 00:15:59.129
And I think that really kind of gets to the heart

00:15:59.129 --> 00:16:01.250
of some of the debate that I was mentioning at

00:16:01.250 --> 00:16:04.529
the beginning of our podcast, which is, it seems

00:16:04.529 --> 00:16:06.850
really exciting and wonderful, all of these things

00:16:06.850 --> 00:16:09.700
that AI can do, but people... you know, really

00:16:09.700 --> 00:16:12.279
thoughtful people like Harari. I mean, he's not

00:16:12.279 --> 00:16:15.059
a he's not a clown. Like, he's freaked out that,

00:16:15.059 --> 00:16:18.309
you know, we've kind of created the our own demise.

00:16:18.509 --> 00:16:20.789
I mean, and so when you're thinking about these

00:16:20.789 --> 00:16:23.250
things, I mean, how are you as a company thinking

00:16:23.250 --> 00:16:26.090
about making the decisions about what AI should

00:16:26.090 --> 00:16:28.950
do, maybe what AI shouldn't do? Yeah, I mean,

00:16:28.950 --> 00:16:31.490
I'll say where we start with everybody. Sometime

00:16:31.490 --> 00:16:33.570
in the late 1800s, the guy that ran the patent

00:16:33.570 --> 00:16:35.250
office for the US said it was time to shut the

00:16:35.250 --> 00:16:36.769
whole thing down because everything that ever

00:16:36.769 --> 00:16:38.730
could have been invented already had been invented.

00:16:39.549 --> 00:16:41.789
That was in the late 1800s, that was said. Now

00:16:41.789 --> 00:16:44.289
just think about the number of, we didn't have

00:16:44.289 --> 00:16:46.860
air flight. commercially. In fact, you know,

00:16:46.940 --> 00:16:49.340
Kitty Hawk was like 1914 or something like that.

00:16:49.340 --> 00:16:52.179
Yeah, give or take. So I mean, and then we've

00:16:52.179 --> 00:16:54.500
gone from like the Wright brothers to the moon

00:16:54.500 --> 00:16:57.100
to now talking about Mars in the last hundred

00:16:57.100 --> 00:17:00.860
and 25 years. And so the reality is that humans

00:17:00.860 --> 00:17:03.370
don't love change. If you were to kind of look

00:17:03.370 --> 00:17:05.769
at like a behavioral chart, like go look at some

00:17:05.769 --> 00:17:07.710
of the peer reviewed disk models and how people,

00:17:07.910 --> 00:17:09.990
you know, there's, there's a small percentage,

00:17:09.990 --> 00:17:12.549
let's call it give or take less than 20 % heuristically

00:17:12.549 --> 00:17:15.049
of the population in the U S that loves the idea

00:17:15.049 --> 00:17:17.630
of change as a starting place. The other 80 %

00:17:17.630 --> 00:17:20.569
not so excited, right? Right. And so, you know,

00:17:20.650 --> 00:17:23.589
we're calculators bad for people in the, in the

00:17:23.589 --> 00:17:26.170
large floors of rooms in corporate America where

00:17:26.170 --> 00:17:28.509
they had 10 foot pieces of paper doing spreadsheets

00:17:28.509 --> 00:17:30.869
by hand with slide rules. Yes, that was very

00:17:30.730 --> 00:17:32.950
bad for that part of the industry. And people

00:17:32.950 --> 00:17:36.009
had to be retrained to do other things. And there

00:17:36.009 --> 00:17:37.890
were some individuals that were really negatively

00:17:37.890 --> 00:17:40.230
impacted by that. And am I worried about how

00:17:40.230 --> 00:17:43.170
my son is going to have to tool up for the job

00:17:43.170 --> 00:17:44.910
world relative to how I did? It's going to have

00:17:44.910 --> 00:17:47.130
to be totally different. Our people have to be

00:17:47.130 --> 00:17:49.150
OK with the fact that things are changing. And

00:17:49.150 --> 00:17:51.430
for us, the way medicine is being practiced is

00:17:51.430 --> 00:17:54.089
changing. And that's OK. And we're going to lean

00:17:54.089 --> 00:17:56.769
into that. But we're really, really thoughtful

00:17:56.769 --> 00:17:59.769
about clinical outcomes first and foremost, measurable

00:17:59.769 --> 00:18:02.910
clinical outcomes. And then we also want sustainability,

00:18:03.309 --> 00:18:05.809
not just financial sustainability, but like behavioral

00:18:05.809 --> 00:18:08.289
change, sustainability, financial sustainability

00:18:08.289 --> 00:18:11.490
for sure. But, but how do you do all these things

00:18:11.490 --> 00:18:14.230
so that the problem that's spinning out of control

00:18:14.230 --> 00:18:16.690
with healthcare in America in particular, like

00:18:16.690 --> 00:18:18.529
we can actually tell individuals and we say this

00:18:18.529 --> 00:18:20.829
to our patients, the system may be working against

00:18:20.829 --> 00:18:23.190
you. Everyone would say it's broken in some way,

00:18:23.390 --> 00:18:26.049
shape or form. And there's enough things you

00:18:26.049 --> 00:18:28.730
control. that if you want to focus on what you

00:18:28.730 --> 00:18:30.769
can control, just accepting that the environment

00:18:30.769 --> 00:18:33.329
sucks, you can do enough to get healthy today.

00:18:33.559 --> 00:18:36.579
John, this reminds me of the conversation that

00:18:36.579 --> 00:18:38.420
you and I had a few months ago. We were having

00:18:38.420 --> 00:18:41.200
dinner together and you were mentioning again,

00:18:41.279 --> 00:18:42.980
a conversation that you're having with your children,

00:18:42.980 --> 00:18:47.420
right? About AI. And I don't want to steal your

00:18:47.420 --> 00:18:49.380
thunder because this was really your idea, but

00:18:49.380 --> 00:18:52.420
maybe you can share a little bit of the insights

00:18:52.420 --> 00:18:54.299
that you shared with me about how you're talking

00:18:54.299 --> 00:18:56.720
to your kids about how AI is going to be impacting

00:18:56.720 --> 00:18:58.900
them in the work world. Yeah, you're talking

00:18:58.900 --> 00:19:00.539
about the conversation we had about knowledge

00:19:00.539 --> 00:19:05.099
and wisdom, right? Yeah, exactly. Yeah, so what

00:19:05.099 --> 00:19:07.480
computers do really well is they handle knowledge

00:19:07.480 --> 00:19:08.960
really, really well. And when I say knowledge,

00:19:08.960 --> 00:19:10.799
I'm talking about things that our brain handles

00:19:10.799 --> 00:19:14.700
kind of in the cerebral cortex and how we process

00:19:14.700 --> 00:19:17.420
information. And Josiah is going to have to kind

00:19:17.420 --> 00:19:20.000
of make sure that he's keeping me saying the

00:19:20.000 --> 00:19:22.200
words correctly here. But broadly speaking, the

00:19:22.200 --> 00:19:24.019
way that a computer processes information is

00:19:24.019 --> 00:19:26.460
really similar to our cerebral cortex. And that

00:19:26.460 --> 00:19:28.259
means that a lot of the work we do there today

00:19:28.259 --> 00:19:30.079
is going to be done by computers later on because

00:19:30.079 --> 00:19:33.440
they're going to be faster, better, on for 24

00:19:33.440 --> 00:19:34.920
hours, like they're just, and they're going to

00:19:34.920 --> 00:19:36.519
make less mistakes. Like that's just the way

00:19:36.519 --> 00:19:38.539
that computers are. However, there's two other

00:19:38.539 --> 00:19:40.460
parts of our brain, the amygdala and the limbic

00:19:40.460 --> 00:19:43.119
system that process information in a much different

00:19:43.119 --> 00:19:45.700
way. It's not just different processors. It's

00:19:45.700 --> 00:19:47.599
actually different biological architecture where

00:19:47.599 --> 00:19:49.740
I'm not the expert at that. But what I do know

00:19:49.740 --> 00:19:52.140
is that information in information out is different

00:19:52.140 --> 00:19:54.539
in those three parts of the brain. And the computer

00:19:54.539 --> 00:19:57.819
has the first one like nailed. And today, I've

00:19:57.819 --> 00:20:00.319
not heard a lot of people talking about making

00:20:00.319 --> 00:20:02.359
different architecture that solves for two and

00:20:02.359 --> 00:20:05.339
three. I've heard lots of emulation conversations.

00:20:05.740 --> 00:20:08.660
How do we emulate emotions? And that would be

00:20:08.660 --> 00:20:12.880
kind of similar to someone who has clinical autism

00:20:12.880 --> 00:20:15.480
level one, and they emulate emotions because

00:20:15.480 --> 00:20:17.240
they've observed it and they can think about

00:20:17.240 --> 00:20:19.619
it, but they're not really feeling in that same

00:20:19.619 --> 00:20:23.019
way that you or I might feel. And computers can

00:20:23.019 --> 00:20:25.539
do that, but we're trying to actually write ways

00:20:25.539 --> 00:20:27.730
to get deeper and better emulators and try to

00:20:27.730 --> 00:20:30.349
re -architect the software so that we can actually

00:20:30.349 --> 00:20:33.430
have computers be more thoughtful about the way

00:20:33.430 --> 00:20:35.190
they're interacting with the human. And then

00:20:35.190 --> 00:20:38.890
teaching my kids, getting human experience, those

00:20:38.890 --> 00:20:40.630
are the things that computers aren't going to

00:20:40.630 --> 00:20:42.690
be able to take the place of in the workforce

00:20:42.690 --> 00:20:47.269
of the future. So how do you find skills that

00:20:47.269 --> 00:20:50.400
are going to be valuable? 20 years now, 30 years

00:20:50.400 --> 00:20:52.319
now, and how do you build toward those? You can

00:20:52.319 --> 00:20:54.839
create value today and create value in the future.

00:20:54.900 --> 00:20:56.839
And then how do you learn how to learn? Because

00:20:56.839 --> 00:20:59.380
you're going to have to be pliable as we go through

00:20:59.380 --> 00:21:01.859
the next, the coming decades. When we were having

00:21:01.859 --> 00:21:04.180
this conversation, you used this phrase that

00:21:04.180 --> 00:21:06.240
I just loved. And so I'm going to, I'm going

00:21:06.240 --> 00:21:08.359
to make sure that you get credit for this phrase.

00:21:08.519 --> 00:21:12.299
You said it's all about wisdom work, right? So,

00:21:12.380 --> 00:21:14.059
and, and, and I thought that that was such a

00:21:14.059 --> 00:21:17.720
great way of explaining in a very shorthand way.

00:21:17.819 --> 00:21:21.240
What you're talking about about these human experiences

00:21:21.240 --> 00:21:25.500
that are not going to be about information and

00:21:25.500 --> 00:21:28.420
information processing, but it's about something

00:21:28.420 --> 00:21:30.599
fundamentally qualitatively different. I mean,

00:21:30.680 --> 00:21:32.500
can you maybe tell us a little bit more about

00:21:32.500 --> 00:21:35.289
like What does that even mean to you? I think

00:21:35.289 --> 00:21:37.690
it's a great question. In wisdom work, I mean,

00:21:37.809 --> 00:21:40.430
it's certainly not a technical or clinical term,

00:21:40.529 --> 00:21:42.269
right? This is a shorthand way for me to talk

00:21:42.269 --> 00:21:44.269
to my kids, right? You made up this phrase, but

00:21:44.269 --> 00:21:46.369
I was like, this is beautiful. I love it. Yeah.

00:21:46.650 --> 00:21:48.650
And what it really is, it's saying like all the

00:21:48.650 --> 00:21:50.569
stuff that computers aren't going to be able

00:21:50.569 --> 00:21:53.990
to handle well, right? So it's how do you do

00:21:53.990 --> 00:21:56.250
the things that aren't going to be done well

00:21:56.250 --> 00:21:58.109
by a computer and how do you lean into that?

00:21:58.170 --> 00:22:00.170
And so that's going to be about, you know, dealing

00:22:00.170 --> 00:22:02.309
with people. I think that's going to be a really

00:22:02.309 --> 00:22:04.329
important part of the future. That could be managing

00:22:04.329 --> 00:22:07.349
people. That could be clinical therapy or clinical

00:22:07.349 --> 00:22:10.309
intervention a lot of different ways. My understanding

00:22:10.309 --> 00:22:12.650
of the brain is that when you go to make decisions

00:22:12.650 --> 00:22:16.900
in a rational, healthy kind of kind of non -abnormal

00:22:16.900 --> 00:22:19.180
psychology kind of brain, that when you make

00:22:19.180 --> 00:22:22.259
a decision, it's generally made emotionally first,

00:22:22.259 --> 00:22:24.180
and then you justify that decision logically.

00:22:24.359 --> 00:22:26.759
And so if someone makes a decision emotionally

00:22:26.759 --> 00:22:29.119
and can't find the logic to back it up, we sometimes

00:22:29.119 --> 00:22:32.700
describe that as buyer's remorse, right? And

00:22:32.700 --> 00:22:35.180
then when somebody makes a decision logically,

00:22:35.640 --> 00:22:38.359
but doesn't have the emotional will to kind of

00:22:38.359 --> 00:22:41.279
commit to it, we have analytical paralysis, right?

00:22:41.559 --> 00:22:43.519
And if you have neither, you just don't make

00:22:43.519 --> 00:22:46.750
the decision. But if you have the decision made

00:22:46.750 --> 00:22:49.029
emotionally and then you justify it with the

00:22:49.029 --> 00:22:51.210
logic, that's where you get people that make

00:22:51.210 --> 00:22:53.569
long -term decisions that are good. And hopefully

00:22:53.569 --> 00:22:55.529
for my kids, they can learn how to do things

00:22:55.529 --> 00:22:58.029
that have kind of delayed gratification, which

00:22:58.029 --> 00:23:00.170
is an important skill set next to everything

00:23:00.170 --> 00:23:01.549
else we're talking about, right? And that's a

00:23:01.549 --> 00:23:04.569
whole other topic. But wisdom work is about understanding

00:23:04.569 --> 00:23:07.059
how the brain works. outside of the cerebral

00:23:07.059 --> 00:23:09.619
cortex and not just the black and white logic,

00:23:09.980 --> 00:23:12.079
but the feelings behind it and what feelings

00:23:12.079 --> 00:23:14.680
are driving that and getting really honest about

00:23:14.680 --> 00:23:17.259
those feelings. And I tell my kids like, you

00:23:17.259 --> 00:23:19.420
know, you can have your own feelings and those

00:23:19.420 --> 00:23:21.880
are going to be valid based on your lived experiences.

00:23:22.119 --> 00:23:24.319
You can have your own opinions. And I'm going

00:23:24.319 --> 00:23:25.940
to have a different level of respect for your

00:23:25.940 --> 00:23:27.920
opinions based on how you formed them. So if

00:23:27.920 --> 00:23:29.599
you've had opinions that are formed because you've

00:23:29.599 --> 00:23:31.920
taken both sides of the argument, you've know

00:23:31.920 --> 00:23:33.960
how to passionately argue both sides. You understand

00:23:33.960 --> 00:23:36.119
all the logic behind both sides. and then you

00:23:36.119 --> 00:23:38.140
form your opinion based on that, I'll have deep

00:23:38.140 --> 00:23:39.920
respect for your opinion. Even if I disagree

00:23:39.920 --> 00:23:42.019
with it, I'll have a deep respect for you. Now,

00:23:42.140 --> 00:23:43.680
if you have an opinion because you read something

00:23:43.680 --> 00:23:45.240
on the internet and that's your opinion now,

00:23:45.440 --> 00:23:47.079
it's still your opinion. I'm just not gonna respect

00:23:47.079 --> 00:23:48.759
it as much because you haven't formed it well.

00:23:49.019 --> 00:23:51.539
The facts we can't change though. Like you don't

00:23:51.539 --> 00:23:54.480
get two sets of facts. And you as a scientist

00:23:54.480 --> 00:23:57.039
know this, like data is the data is the data.

00:23:57.220 --> 00:23:59.480
I just saw something the other day, a marketing

00:23:59.480 --> 00:24:01.460
company marketed something based on a study.

00:24:01.500 --> 00:24:03.599
And I went back and read the study and the study

00:24:03.599 --> 00:24:06.299
was clear. No conclusive evidence. This is true.

00:24:06.519 --> 00:24:08.240
And the marketer was like, this thing studied

00:24:08.240 --> 00:24:09.960
this thing. And it's like, that should be against

00:24:09.960 --> 00:24:12.220
the law. Like it should, you should not, like

00:24:12.220 --> 00:24:15.279
it is so misleading. I was, I was angry. I can

00:24:15.279 --> 00:24:17.579
name the feeling I was angry. Well, those things,

00:24:17.599 --> 00:24:20.079
those things infuriate me as well, too. And I

00:24:20.079 --> 00:24:22.700
think that you're also tapping into something

00:24:22.700 --> 00:24:26.079
really important that I think as scientists we

00:24:26.079 --> 00:24:27.640
sometimes have a little bit of trouble with,

00:24:27.740 --> 00:24:31.339
which is the idea that emotion and intuition.

00:24:31.859 --> 00:24:34.700
These are a part of the human experience that

00:24:34.700 --> 00:24:39.000
are important in how we make decisions and important

00:24:39.000 --> 00:24:44.640
and that we use facts. Hopefully, we use logic,

00:24:45.180 --> 00:24:50.299
but we also use intuition and feeling and that

00:24:50.299 --> 00:24:54.859
is not going to be, at least as I can understand

00:24:54.859 --> 00:24:59.279
it now, easily replaced by even the best of AIs.

00:24:59.819 --> 00:25:01.420
And I know, Josiah, you weren't there with us

00:25:01.420 --> 00:25:04.190
when we were having this conversation, but Certainly

00:25:04.190 --> 00:25:07.450
you must be thinking about how AI is changing

00:25:07.450 --> 00:25:09.730
what people are doing and what people are not

00:25:09.730 --> 00:25:12.289
doing at work because you're actively trying

00:25:12.289 --> 00:25:15.130
to do that. So I mean, what, when you're thinking

00:25:15.130 --> 00:25:18.089
about at Prasena, what do you see as the great

00:25:18.089 --> 00:25:20.990
benefits of using AI and maybe even some of the

00:25:20.990 --> 00:25:23.930
challenges of where this could come in? Using

00:25:23.930 --> 00:25:26.890
AI is going to unlock things that we don't know.

00:25:27.009 --> 00:25:29.890
As humans, we are bad at predicting the future.

00:25:30.130 --> 00:25:32.910
I'm fascinated by the drawings I've seen from

00:25:32.910 --> 00:25:37.109
the 1930s and 40s of the optimistic 2020s and

00:25:37.109 --> 00:25:39.609
the people riding around on the waves with their

00:25:39.609 --> 00:25:41.250
video phones hanging out in front of them talking

00:25:41.250 --> 00:25:43.789
to the people. You know, we can laugh at that

00:25:43.789 --> 00:25:46.089
and see how cute it is and draw analogies between

00:25:46.089 --> 00:25:48.410
that and the iPhones and FaceTime. But let's

00:25:48.410 --> 00:25:50.809
face that, we're not very good at predicting

00:25:50.809 --> 00:25:52.809
what's going to happen and the effects of that

00:25:52.809 --> 00:25:56.250
technology on our interactions. AI in the short

00:25:56.250 --> 00:25:59.490
term has really made a difference in how I work.

00:25:59.809 --> 00:26:03.170
And I committed to making the AI that I make

00:26:03.170 --> 00:26:05.869
have a positive impact, putting safeguard rails

00:26:05.869 --> 00:26:09.089
around it, thinking about how people will feel

00:26:09.089 --> 00:26:12.049
when they use my technology. And yes, I do use

00:26:12.049 --> 00:26:14.809
that intentionally as a technologist, thinking

00:26:14.809 --> 00:26:17.589
about people's feelings. We've done a disservice

00:26:17.589 --> 00:26:21.109
in society and not emphasizing people's need

00:26:21.109 --> 00:26:23.630
to have strong and positive labels for their

00:26:23.630 --> 00:26:25.670
feelings, understanding the nuance of their feelings

00:26:25.670 --> 00:26:28.170
and their emotions. My research has led me to

00:26:28.170 --> 00:26:31.029
conclude that memories are formed first from

00:26:31.029 --> 00:26:34.509
our limbic system. The limbic system encodes

00:26:34.509 --> 00:26:36.990
our memories of how we feel about situations,

00:26:37.430 --> 00:26:40.950
and then our minds go back to backfill those

00:26:40.950 --> 00:26:43.710
memories with facts as best as we can fit them.

00:26:44.269 --> 00:26:47.150
If we don't have a rational capacity for labeling

00:26:47.150 --> 00:26:49.509
our feelings, we're going to have difficulties

00:26:49.509 --> 00:26:51.710
processing those feelings as memories of the

00:26:51.710 --> 00:26:54.190
future. But the point is, is that if I can focus

00:26:54.190 --> 00:26:56.990
on how the technology that I make helps people

00:26:56.990 --> 00:26:59.230
feel, makes people feel, I can make a better,

00:26:59.450 --> 00:27:01.710
more grounded experience for them. So practically

00:27:01.710 --> 00:27:04.390
speaking, that looks like when I'm making a patient

00:27:04.390 --> 00:27:07.730
advocate app that helps them advocate for themselves,

00:27:07.890 --> 00:27:10.309
know what questions to ask and respond to the

00:27:10.309 --> 00:27:13.089
patient about their medical situation. I'm not

00:27:13.089 --> 00:27:15.529
going to just throw in a large language model,

00:27:15.809 --> 00:27:18.289
five page prompt, call it a day, you often have

00:27:18.289 --> 00:27:20.960
a cocktail. I'm going to take some serious work

00:27:20.960 --> 00:27:23.299
in putting guardrails around it, deconstructing

00:27:23.299 --> 00:27:26.559
the experience, thinking about, can I take emotional

00:27:26.559 --> 00:27:29.619
cues? Can I factor in their sociological background,

00:27:29.960 --> 00:27:33.700
their family history? Can I put in place rules

00:27:33.700 --> 00:27:36.660
around what the AI can say and can't say when

00:27:36.660 --> 00:27:38.880
it can defer to the human provider? I'm going

00:27:38.880 --> 00:27:41.470
to put a very nuanced... thought to the experience

00:27:41.470 --> 00:27:43.630
so that their feelings are considered. And at

00:27:43.630 --> 00:27:45.410
the end of the day, it's going to be a very simple

00:27:45.410 --> 00:27:47.710
experience. It can be a chat window or a phone

00:27:47.710 --> 00:27:49.589
call, but there is going to be much more work

00:27:49.589 --> 00:27:51.650
put into considering the human experience rather

00:27:51.650 --> 00:27:53.930
than just the technology or how easy or hard

00:27:53.930 --> 00:27:57.099
it is for me to create. That's great. Go ahead,

00:27:57.200 --> 00:27:59.539
John, please. My hope for this is that if we

00:27:59.539 --> 00:28:01.519
get really good at prompting AI, it's going to

00:28:01.519 --> 00:28:03.339
teach us to ask better questions of one another,

00:28:03.380 --> 00:28:06.740
not just of the computer. You give a bad prompt

00:28:06.740 --> 00:28:09.140
to an AI, you get a bad set of data out. And

00:28:09.140 --> 00:28:11.279
if you're humble enough to recognize that, hey,

00:28:11.319 --> 00:28:13.140
that's because of me, not because of the computer,

00:28:13.599 --> 00:28:15.420
then you start to learn to ask better questions.

00:28:15.519 --> 00:28:17.980
And so when you look at intent analysis or sentiment

00:28:17.980 --> 00:28:21.079
analysis in computers, what it's doing is it's

00:28:21.079 --> 00:28:24.670
actually looking at the surface level. great

00:28:24.670 --> 00:28:26.490
therapist would say the problem the patient brings

00:28:26.490 --> 00:28:28.950
you isn't the problem. It's usually several layers

00:28:28.950 --> 00:28:31.109
deeper than that. And that's work that we can

00:28:31.109 --> 00:28:33.809
maybe teach computers to do over time. But I

00:28:33.809 --> 00:28:36.529
think better better serve would be having a computer,

00:28:36.529 --> 00:28:38.930
you know, psychologically code the conversation

00:28:38.930 --> 00:28:40.750
and then indicate to the human like, hey, there's

00:28:40.750 --> 00:28:42.789
something deeper here. I can't get it. That's

00:28:42.789 --> 00:28:44.910
your job. That's the wisdom work. Right. And

00:28:44.910 --> 00:28:47.470
so that's, you know, in this yesterday show up

00:28:47.470 --> 00:28:48.950
very clearly in a conversation where someone

00:28:48.950 --> 00:28:51.089
was telling me about another person. And they're

00:28:51.089 --> 00:28:52.609
like, you know, they're motivated by money. And

00:28:52.609 --> 00:28:55.000
I said, I'm sorry. you know, respectfully and

00:28:55.000 --> 00:28:56.180
expertly, I'm going to tell you that they're

00:28:56.180 --> 00:28:58.299
not motivated by money. In fact, no one's motivated

00:28:58.299 --> 00:29:00.400
by money. They're motivated by what that money

00:29:00.400 --> 00:29:02.660
does for them or what it means to them. So maybe

00:29:02.660 --> 00:29:04.440
it's ego. Maybe it's a scorecard. Maybe it's

00:29:04.440 --> 00:29:06.440
what they can buy. Maybe it's security. Maybe

00:29:06.440 --> 00:29:08.460
it's something else. But money is always the

00:29:08.460 --> 00:29:11.259
secondary thing. And so if you don't understand

00:29:11.259 --> 00:29:12.940
the underpinning motivation, you're going to

00:29:12.940 --> 00:29:14.480
have a hard time connecting with that person

00:29:14.480 --> 00:29:16.650
the way that you want to. That's an amazing point.

00:29:16.970 --> 00:29:19.769
I think we are running to the end of our time

00:29:19.769 --> 00:29:21.710
together, although I could keep talking with

00:29:21.710 --> 00:29:24.130
the two of you about how you're using AI and

00:29:24.130 --> 00:29:28.609
your thoughts about AI for hours, given my own

00:29:28.609 --> 00:29:31.630
interests in this area run really deep and also

00:29:31.630 --> 00:29:34.269
you're just both a lot of fun to talk to. I want

00:29:34.269 --> 00:29:36.990
to give you each a chance to sort of say if there's

00:29:36.990 --> 00:29:39.509
anything that you want to end with, especially

00:29:39.509 --> 00:29:41.609
about the work that you're doing at Prasena and

00:29:41.609 --> 00:29:45.720
how AI is shaping that. Maybe you'll turn to

00:29:45.720 --> 00:29:47.920
Josiah and then let John kind of close us out.

00:29:48.339 --> 00:29:50.976
My view on AI, if I could say anything is...

00:29:50.970 --> 00:29:53.029
see through the hype and look at it as a tool.

00:29:53.369 --> 00:29:55.369
Inherently, it's about how we use the tool. I

00:29:55.369 --> 00:29:57.690
would look like an idiot if I showed up to a

00:29:57.690 --> 00:29:59.609
wedding with a hammer to cut a cake. I'd look

00:29:59.609 --> 00:30:01.430
like an idiot if I showed up to a construction

00:30:01.430 --> 00:30:04.329
site with a cake cutter to hang drywall. AI is

00:30:04.329 --> 00:30:07.509
a tool, learn what it is, learn how it can assist

00:30:07.509 --> 00:30:09.329
you and use the right tool for the right job.

00:30:09.509 --> 00:30:11.970
And that's what I try to do with AI and tools

00:30:11.970 --> 00:30:14.869
in Prasena to help our patients and help our

00:30:14.869 --> 00:30:17.809
providers. I'll end up with our latest research

00:30:17.809 --> 00:30:19.410
that hasn't yet been published, but our data

00:30:19.410 --> 00:30:21.890
has been collected. We had 79 patients with an

00:30:21.890 --> 00:30:25.650
average A1C of 11 .06 coming out of the hospital.

00:30:25.990 --> 00:30:28.349
And in the first 90 days, dropped them to 7 .8,

00:30:28.349 --> 00:30:31.849
and 180 days to 7 .2, with 30 % coming off of

00:30:31.849 --> 00:30:34.589
insulin at the six -month mark. The clinical

00:30:34.589 --> 00:30:36.470
results we're having, because we've leaned into

00:30:36.470 --> 00:30:39.930
the tools, are really fun to talk about. And

00:30:39.930 --> 00:30:42.809
it took us 10 years to get here. We've been playing

00:30:42.809 --> 00:30:45.819
with AI for a decade. I think it's really, it's

00:30:45.819 --> 00:30:47.779
like we're another overnight success 10 years

00:30:47.779 --> 00:30:50.500
in the making. And so, you know, I think, I think

00:30:50.500 --> 00:30:52.640
this is, it's a thing that's here to stay. And

00:30:52.640 --> 00:30:54.099
it's something that's going to take time for

00:30:54.099 --> 00:30:56.680
people to learn. And it's going to be frustrating

00:30:56.680 --> 00:30:58.440
in moments. Certainly we talk about all these

00:30:58.440 --> 00:31:00.240
great things we're doing when we're on podcasts

00:31:00.240 --> 00:31:02.380
like this, but you know, we also, we don't talk

00:31:02.380 --> 00:31:04.500
about the, all the, the long weekends that, you

00:31:04.500 --> 00:31:06.539
know, Josiah, Dustin and I spent 16 hours on

00:31:06.539 --> 00:31:08.819
a Saturday and Sunday banging our head into a

00:31:08.819 --> 00:31:11.359
wall to get it wrong 32 times. And then we finally

00:31:11.359 --> 00:31:13.779
get something that, that makes sense and is helpful.

00:31:14.039 --> 00:31:16.210
So. it's a tool and it's a tool that's being

00:31:16.210 --> 00:31:18.269
shaped and developed right now. So it's not a

00:31:18.269 --> 00:31:20.910
mass generated hammer or a video game that's

00:31:20.910 --> 00:31:22.710
been worked on for 10 years that has no bugs.

00:31:22.890 --> 00:31:25.150
Like AI is this thing that's constantly being

00:31:25.150 --> 00:31:27.329
relearned and every time a new model comes out

00:31:27.329 --> 00:31:30.049
from any of the major producers, we have to evaluate

00:31:30.049 --> 00:31:31.970
the whole model in light of what we know and

00:31:31.970 --> 00:31:34.029
then maybe even unplug something and replug something.

00:31:34.089 --> 00:31:36.390
So I'm constantly pushing on Josiah for more

00:31:36.390 --> 00:31:39.009
modular, flexible development and to be able

00:31:39.009 --> 00:31:41.529
to be more nimble more as we grow. And he of

00:31:41.529 --> 00:31:43.869
course is like constantly pushing. back on me

00:31:43.869 --> 00:31:45.670
about the unreasonable demands that I'm making

00:31:45.670 --> 00:31:48.789
about technology. But the reality is what it's

00:31:48.789 --> 00:31:50.910
going to lead to is better patient agency, better

00:31:50.910 --> 00:31:53.450
healthcare outcomes, and people being able to

00:31:53.450 --> 00:31:56.130
spend more time focusing on human connection

00:31:56.130 --> 00:31:59.190
with each other if we want it to. And so my hope

00:31:59.190 --> 00:32:00.930
is that we have a more connected world, not a

00:32:00.930 --> 00:32:03.470
less connected world because of AI, if we choose

00:32:03.470 --> 00:32:05.710
to use the tool that way. And I think that, you

00:32:05.710 --> 00:32:07.730
know, in our, we're seeing that happen for real

00:32:07.730 --> 00:32:10.130
inside of our practice, with our patients, with

00:32:10.130 --> 00:32:12.910
our team, with each other. We're a much more

00:32:12.910 --> 00:32:15.190
connected community than we were even a year

00:32:15.190 --> 00:32:17.289
ago because we have more time. more space, more

00:32:17.289 --> 00:32:19.809
energy, more to talk about. And so for anybody

00:32:19.809 --> 00:32:21.430
out there, I'd really encourage you like use

00:32:21.430 --> 00:32:24.950
AI to drive forward human connection, not to

00:32:24.950 --> 00:32:26.869
isolate yourself, which is already too big a

00:32:26.869 --> 00:32:29.529
problem, not to become more polar in the conversation,

00:32:29.549 --> 00:32:31.809
but to come back and meet people where they are.

00:32:31.829 --> 00:32:33.589
Like go meet your neighbor right where they are.

00:32:33.789 --> 00:32:36.250
It is the most amazing human experience to do

00:32:36.250 --> 00:32:38.289
that. Like that's what we're really excited about.

00:32:38.329 --> 00:32:40.589
Like how do we do this for a billion people in

00:32:40.589 --> 00:32:43.210
the next 50 years? That's our goal. Amazing.

00:32:43.410 --> 00:32:46.059
Thank you, John and Josiah for joining us. on

00:32:46.059 --> 00:32:47.900
such a great discussion. If you want to learn

00:32:47.900 --> 00:32:50.900
more about the work of Prasena Health, you can

00:32:50.900 --> 00:32:54.059
go to their website, prasena .com, P -R -E -C

00:32:54.059 --> 00:32:57.000
-I -N -A .com. And if you have questions for

00:32:57.000 --> 00:32:58.619
the guests on our show or you want to support

00:32:58.619 --> 00:33:01.059
the transformative research and programs here

00:33:01.059 --> 00:33:05.400
at USC, you can email us at listenuppeople at

00:33:05.400 --> 00:33:08.759
usc .edu. And just one more time, thank you both

00:33:08.759 --> 00:33:10.839
so much for joining me. Thanks, Eric. We'll be

00:33:10.839 --> 00:33:12.420
back anytime. We'd love to geek out about this

00:33:12.420 --> 00:33:15.299
stuff. 100%. you
