1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:28,080
Hi, I'm Murdoch Gaddi and thanks for listening to the Rate of Change with York Wealth Management.

2
00:00:28,080 --> 00:00:31,480
Hi, I'm Murdoch Gaddi and welcome back to the Rate of Change.

3
00:00:31,480 --> 00:00:35,840
The Rate of Change is a podcast which explores the ever-shifting momentum of financial markets

4
00:00:35,840 --> 00:00:39,520
through the eyes of the leading managers in wealth management.

5
00:00:39,520 --> 00:00:44,240
In today's Rockcast, I'm really excited to speak with Josh Manning, the founder and portfolio

6
00:00:44,240 --> 00:00:46,600
manager at Manning Asset Management.

7
00:00:46,600 --> 00:00:50,960
Manning Asset Management is an Australian-based fund manager that specializes in investments

8
00:00:50,960 --> 00:00:52,940
in the private debt markets.

9
00:00:52,940 --> 00:00:57,440
They have an all-weather strategy approach that targets an interest and income return

10
00:00:57,440 --> 00:01:00,560
within the fund of 5% above the cash rate.

11
00:01:00,560 --> 00:01:06,400
This fund is income generating, pays distributions monthly and has consistently delivered 5%

12
00:01:06,400 --> 00:01:09,920
in income over the past 6 years.

13
00:01:09,920 --> 00:01:14,680
I think you will find Josh is an insightful speaker, really knows his stuff in the private

14
00:01:14,680 --> 00:01:16,080
lending space.

15
00:01:16,080 --> 00:01:19,840
If you like what you hear, please reach out to me with your thoughts and questions at

16
00:01:19,840 --> 00:01:24,320
mgaddi at ywm.com.au.

17
00:01:24,320 --> 00:01:28,520
Before considering any investments, we encourage you to both listen to the disclaimer at the

18
00:01:28,520 --> 00:01:31,840
end of the Rockcast and seek professional advice.

19
00:01:31,840 --> 00:01:36,880
We would like to reiterate that this Rockcast isn't designed nor is it intended to be specific

20
00:01:36,880 --> 00:01:37,880
advice.

21
00:01:37,880 --> 00:01:51,360
I hope you really enjoy the discussions as much as I did, so relax and enjoy the conversation.

22
00:01:51,360 --> 00:01:55,680
Josh Manning, welcome to the Rate of Change with York Health Management.

23
00:01:55,680 --> 00:01:56,680
Thank you for having me.

24
00:01:56,680 --> 00:02:02,120
Why don't we start things off by you telling us a little bit about who Josh Manning is,

25
00:02:02,120 --> 00:02:05,600
your background and your journey into financial markets.

26
00:02:05,600 --> 00:02:06,600
Excellent.

27
00:02:06,600 --> 00:02:10,720
So, yeah, Josh Manning, the portfolio manager at Manning Asset Management.

28
00:02:10,720 --> 00:02:14,180
We're Australian fixed income and credit manager.

29
00:02:14,180 --> 00:02:20,960
So my journey into financial services, I guess, started when I left university.

30
00:02:20,960 --> 00:02:26,440
Lucky enough to work at a number of institutions like Macquarie Bank and then more recently

31
00:02:26,440 --> 00:02:32,720
a very large asset consultant called JANA, which is advisors of many of the largest institutional

32
00:02:32,720 --> 00:02:35,360
investors in Australia.

33
00:02:35,360 --> 00:02:39,600
The journey into Manning Asset Management really started back in 2015.

34
00:02:39,600 --> 00:02:46,240
I was working for JANA at the time and I saw a gap in investor portfolios and that gap

35
00:02:46,240 --> 00:02:55,080
was really in that some in assets that you can put into portfolios, which genuinely do

36
00:02:55,080 --> 00:02:56,480
perform through the cycle.

37
00:02:56,480 --> 00:03:04,960
So genuinely have that capital stability attributes, but can deliver an attractive income based

38
00:03:04,960 --> 00:03:05,960
return.

39
00:03:05,960 --> 00:03:11,420
So it can really play a very valuable role in adding diversification, complementing existing

40
00:03:11,420 --> 00:03:14,680
sort of stocks bond property type portfolios.

41
00:03:14,680 --> 00:03:18,520
But really delivering on that income type objective.

42
00:03:18,520 --> 00:03:23,640
And there's a number of assets that historically played that role, but I felt like there wasn't

43
00:03:23,640 --> 00:03:28,440
really enough, you know, portfolios quite barbell, sort of low risk and high risk.

44
00:03:28,440 --> 00:03:30,700
So there was a real gap there.

45
00:03:30,700 --> 00:03:35,000
And at the same time, I also saw the changes in financial markets, specifically in the

46
00:03:35,000 --> 00:03:39,560
banking sector and the non-bank sector and that creating investment opportunities that

47
00:03:39,560 --> 00:03:44,400
I personally was very excited about investing in and started investing in and thought there's

48
00:03:44,400 --> 00:03:50,040
a real gap for a specialist fund manager to really focus on that sector and there was

49
00:03:50,040 --> 00:03:51,920
born Manning Asset Management.

50
00:03:51,920 --> 00:03:52,920
Perfect.

51
00:03:52,920 --> 00:03:53,920
Yeah.

52
00:03:53,920 --> 00:03:54,920
Okay.

53
00:03:54,920 --> 00:03:57,360
So with the landscape, that's a really interesting one.

54
00:03:57,360 --> 00:04:00,340
So when did you see this actually change?

55
00:04:00,340 --> 00:04:02,460
Was it after the GFC?

56
00:04:02,460 --> 00:04:07,000
Was it most recently like with 2017 where the bank said, look, we don't want the risk in

57
00:04:07,000 --> 00:04:08,000
our book anymore?

58
00:04:08,000 --> 00:04:13,640
Like what specifically in the in a landscape saw this opportunity and, and why did you

59
00:04:13,640 --> 00:04:19,360
think a fund was best instead of like just going private or, you know, sure.

60
00:04:19,360 --> 00:04:20,360
Yeah, sure.

61
00:04:20,360 --> 00:04:21,360
Yeah.

62
00:04:21,360 --> 00:04:22,360
Like it's quite interesting.

63
00:04:22,360 --> 00:04:26,680
Like when I, when I started or was starting the business, I did a couple of research trips

64
00:04:26,680 --> 00:04:34,040
to the U S where the banking system has evolved and changed and very different to the Australian

65
00:04:34,040 --> 00:04:37,560
banking system in terms of a number of factors.

66
00:04:37,560 --> 00:04:45,240
But one very important one is the split between the traditional banks and the so-called non-banks.

67
00:04:45,240 --> 00:04:49,800
So they are lenders, they directly compete, but they're regulated quite differently for

68
00:04:49,800 --> 00:04:51,840
a variety of reasons.

69
00:04:51,840 --> 00:04:54,840
Most notably those non-banks can't accept deposits.

70
00:04:54,840 --> 00:04:59,920
So they're a different construct than a bank and therefore have different regulations around

71
00:04:59,920 --> 00:05:07,320
them in the U S about half of the loans are originated by banks and half by non-banks.

72
00:05:07,320 --> 00:05:11,080
Whereas you compare that to Australia and while it is changing, it's still largely about

73
00:05:11,080 --> 00:05:19,800
90% of loans originated by Australian banks and 10%, but very quickly growing or by the

74
00:05:19,800 --> 00:05:21,320
non-banks.

75
00:05:21,320 --> 00:05:26,420
And those non-banks are an interesting space because there are some really interesting

76
00:05:26,420 --> 00:05:32,240
credit and fixed income opportunities that those non-banks offer in order to fund the

77
00:05:32,240 --> 00:05:34,360
loans that they originate.

78
00:05:34,360 --> 00:05:41,920
And I saw that really in its infancy, but having quite a high degree of sophistication.

79
00:05:41,920 --> 00:05:45,960
And I thought that is an area that really is going to boom.

80
00:05:45,960 --> 00:05:51,400
And it is particularly attractive from that investor perspective that I talked about before.

81
00:05:51,400 --> 00:05:56,120
And I sort of married those two up and thought, okay, this is really going to be a booming

82
00:05:56,120 --> 00:05:57,160
sector.

83
00:05:57,160 --> 00:06:00,560
And I don't think it's sort of like a point in time.

84
00:06:00,560 --> 00:06:05,920
I think the regulations, there's a lot of changes in regulations that have continued

85
00:06:05,920 --> 00:06:09,400
to support the non-banks.

86
00:06:09,400 --> 00:06:12,320
And I didn't see that abating.

87
00:06:12,320 --> 00:06:18,080
So as I say, I thought there was a really attractive opportunity for a broad cross section

88
00:06:18,080 --> 00:06:23,280
of investors to access these opportunities and the fund was designed to extract that.

89
00:06:23,280 --> 00:06:25,360
Yeah, very nice.

90
00:06:25,360 --> 00:06:32,240
So when you say the fund was developed to extract that, which loans essentially was

91
00:06:32,240 --> 00:06:33,520
attractive for you?

92
00:06:33,520 --> 00:06:35,520
Are you looking at corporate loans?

93
00:06:35,520 --> 00:06:38,320
Are you looking at retail loans?

94
00:06:38,320 --> 00:06:42,840
What specifically, in an ideal world, if someone knocked on your door and said, look, we would

95
00:06:42,840 --> 00:06:46,520
love some money, who would you like to lend to?

96
00:06:46,520 --> 00:06:53,640
What does your avatar, I suppose, of your ideal borrower look like?

97
00:06:53,640 --> 00:06:58,440
Yeah, so I think that the sort of founding principles of the business is, what are we

98
00:06:58,440 --> 00:07:00,040
trying to do for investors?

99
00:07:00,040 --> 00:07:06,960
Yes, there's all sorts of consumer business, structured finance, every type of loan under

100
00:07:06,960 --> 00:07:12,560
the sun, but what are we really trying to do for investors who we work for?

101
00:07:12,560 --> 00:07:19,400
And that is we're trying to give them a asset or a fund that we genuinely believe will perform

102
00:07:19,400 --> 00:07:20,760
through the cycle.

103
00:07:20,760 --> 00:07:26,520
So that means it's genuinely when we enter an asset, we think even in an adverse environment,

104
00:07:26,520 --> 00:07:31,640
we are going to get 100% of our money back when the loan matures.

105
00:07:31,640 --> 00:07:36,200
And that naturally puts a lid on the types of assets we can go into.

106
00:07:36,200 --> 00:07:46,240
So we can't go into things that are speculative, that are high risk, areas that are sectors

107
00:07:46,240 --> 00:07:48,120
that are very cyclical.

108
00:07:48,120 --> 00:07:52,720
We've talked about mining before, property development is another really good one, where

109
00:07:52,720 --> 00:07:56,520
in the good times it's good, in the bad times there is issues.

110
00:07:56,520 --> 00:08:01,560
And that just naturally creates a risk aversion to those sectors.

111
00:08:01,560 --> 00:08:04,760
You're looking at from the other side of the thing, we're also not looking for a government

112
00:08:04,760 --> 00:08:07,920
bond that's delivering 1%, 2%, 3%.

113
00:08:07,920 --> 00:08:12,280
We really think there's a really attractive place where you can be in between those, delivering

114
00:08:12,280 --> 00:08:19,080
a higher rate of return than those very low risk, very long duration bonds, but not having

115
00:08:19,080 --> 00:08:24,480
to go right up the risk spectrum into these some are very cyclical, high return, but high

116
00:08:24,480 --> 00:08:26,720
risk products.

117
00:08:26,720 --> 00:08:33,360
So that means that if we want to play in that middle space where we do provide an attractive

118
00:08:33,360 --> 00:08:37,400
rate of return, but that capital stability, then we really need to find things that are

119
00:08:37,400 --> 00:08:38,880
typically asset backed.

120
00:08:38,880 --> 00:08:44,520
So we've got security over a property or an asset or something like that.

121
00:08:44,520 --> 00:08:50,380
They need to be very sensibly structured in terms of how we actually manage those loans

122
00:08:50,380 --> 00:08:54,720
and making sure there's the right governance around them.

123
00:08:54,720 --> 00:08:59,880
We need to make sure that there's a strong alignment of interest, that we're not pulling

124
00:08:59,880 --> 00:09:03,400
in opposition to the borrower.

125
00:09:03,400 --> 00:09:06,280
And I think most importantly that the loan makes sense for the borrower.

126
00:09:06,280 --> 00:09:11,600
There's a lot of lending out there done on an asset basis where people just think, well,

127
00:09:11,600 --> 00:09:14,040
I've got an asset there, it doesn't matter.

128
00:09:14,040 --> 00:09:16,920
Kind of if the loan makes sense, I'm secure.

129
00:09:16,920 --> 00:09:20,960
I think some of those attributes are troublesome.

130
00:09:20,960 --> 00:09:23,000
And as I say, we like to stay away from that.

131
00:09:23,000 --> 00:09:29,800
So it's really sensibly structured loans where we have a strong asset backing to good borrowers

132
00:09:29,800 --> 00:09:34,200
where we know with a pretty high level of conviction that we will get our money back,

133
00:09:34,200 --> 00:09:36,240
even in adverse scenario.

134
00:09:36,240 --> 00:09:40,520
That's kind of high level what we're trying to, where we play.

135
00:09:40,520 --> 00:09:41,520
Yeah.

136
00:09:41,520 --> 00:09:47,840
So on that as well, if you think about the type of people which you're lending to, right?

137
00:09:47,840 --> 00:09:54,240
So with the portfolio now, how many loans are actually in the portfolio and what size

138
00:09:54,240 --> 00:09:56,680
parcels are you looking at?

139
00:09:56,680 --> 00:09:58,640
In what would the average be?

140
00:09:58,640 --> 00:10:00,280
Or what would the minimum you lend to?

141
00:10:00,280 --> 00:10:01,280
Is there any maximum?

142
00:10:01,280 --> 00:10:03,280
What would that be?

143
00:10:03,280 --> 00:10:04,280
Yeah.

144
00:10:04,280 --> 00:10:09,000
There's definitely maximums and that's because we want to make sure there's sufficient diversification

145
00:10:09,000 --> 00:10:12,000
in the portfolio and there's not so-called concentration risk.

146
00:10:12,000 --> 00:10:16,800
We don't have a big position to one particular borrower.

147
00:10:16,800 --> 00:10:22,800
What we think is the really attractive place to be is in purchasing pools of these loans.

148
00:10:22,800 --> 00:10:29,880
So this isn't just having $1 million loan to somebody, but for example, in the consumer

149
00:10:29,880 --> 00:10:38,720
loan space, we might buy $10 million worth of numerous underlying $30,000, $40,000 personal

150
00:10:38,720 --> 00:10:43,280
loans to buy a car for a variety of different reasons.

151
00:10:43,280 --> 00:10:48,760
But these very, very diversified pools of loans where you don't have the concentration

152
00:10:48,760 --> 00:10:54,320
risk and there's a lot of sort of structural protections when we purchase these asset pools

153
00:10:54,320 --> 00:10:57,960
that provides that level of capital stability.

154
00:10:57,960 --> 00:10:59,520
So I don't know what the stat is.

155
00:10:59,520 --> 00:11:05,760
I think there's about 8,000 different underlying exposures in the portfolio today, which is

156
00:11:05,760 --> 00:11:07,920
great from a diversification perspective.

157
00:11:07,920 --> 00:11:13,640
But the key thing that we're really looking for is that what are the capital preservation

158
00:11:13,640 --> 00:11:16,560
characteristics of this transaction?

159
00:11:16,560 --> 00:11:21,360
And when we stress test it looking at a number of different historical and future looking

160
00:11:21,360 --> 00:11:26,840
scenarios, do we have that conviction around being able to realise our capital on time?

161
00:11:26,840 --> 00:11:29,960
And that's the real test that we put it through.

162
00:11:29,960 --> 00:11:38,200
So you talk to essentially the capacity to have investment that can withstand the cycles.

163
00:11:38,200 --> 00:11:43,400
So what happens if you have an asset which you lend to in the portfolio?

164
00:11:43,400 --> 00:11:45,760
I suppose sours, right?

165
00:11:45,760 --> 00:11:49,800
Something happens, what's the risk around that?

166
00:11:49,800 --> 00:11:53,760
Or how do you look at mitigating against that risk?

167
00:11:53,760 --> 00:11:55,120
Do you take, is it only first mortgages?

168
00:11:55,120 --> 00:11:56,120
Is it a second?

169
00:11:56,120 --> 00:11:57,120
Is it syndicated?

170
00:11:57,120 --> 00:12:04,160
Do you mind giving a list, is it a bit of colour of how you protect against those interests?

171
00:12:04,160 --> 00:12:10,560
Yeah, so the thing about us is that we're not just a property development or a consumer

172
00:12:10,560 --> 00:12:11,740
loan specialist.

173
00:12:11,740 --> 00:12:14,040
We have capabilities right across the spectrum.

174
00:12:14,040 --> 00:12:18,880
So we look all across the different assets, consumer loans, business loans, property-based

175
00:12:18,880 --> 00:12:23,020
loans, and we're able to essentially pick the eyes out of the market.

176
00:12:23,020 --> 00:12:25,600
So each of those sectors are unique.

177
00:12:25,600 --> 00:12:30,280
So one sector that we really like is bridging mortgages.

178
00:12:30,280 --> 00:12:33,960
So these are typically a 65% loan to value ratio.

179
00:12:33,960 --> 00:12:37,640
So the building might be worth a million dollars.

180
00:12:37,640 --> 00:12:41,360
They're wanting a loan of $650,000, so 65% LVR.

181
00:12:41,360 --> 00:12:45,240
It's a 12-month term.

182
00:12:45,240 --> 00:12:49,760
Director's guarantees or personal guarantees, so the strong alignment of interest.

183
00:12:49,760 --> 00:12:52,240
First mortgage security over the property.

184
00:12:52,240 --> 00:12:56,760
No construction, they're not knocking it down and rebuilding it.

185
00:12:56,760 --> 00:13:00,680
So we like those transactions because firstly, alignment of interest.

186
00:13:00,680 --> 00:13:05,240
There's an asset there that we're lending conservatively against.

187
00:13:05,240 --> 00:13:08,040
But scenarios do occur.

188
00:13:08,040 --> 00:13:11,640
There might be an unforeseen personal issue with the borrower.

189
00:13:11,640 --> 00:13:15,600
And that's where all the other risk mitigants that we put in really come into play.

190
00:13:15,600 --> 00:13:21,560
So firstly, in that particular scenario, we have got a first ranking security over the

191
00:13:21,560 --> 00:13:22,560
property.

192
00:13:22,560 --> 00:13:29,200
So if in the event they don't pay, there is protections there for us to obviously compel

193
00:13:29,200 --> 00:13:34,560
the borrower to realise that security to repay our loan.

194
00:13:34,560 --> 00:13:39,240
From a portfolio perspective, though, we also think very much around, well, what happens

195
00:13:39,240 --> 00:13:43,960
if that security, there's an issue in selling it or whatever.

196
00:13:43,960 --> 00:13:48,240
And that's why we also then have a second line of defence, which is very much around

197
00:13:48,240 --> 00:13:55,400
taking small chunks of many, many loans so that even in the event there's some idiosyncratic

198
00:13:55,400 --> 00:13:59,240
risk with that one property and they have trouble selling it or they don't get as much

199
00:13:59,240 --> 00:14:05,120
as what we think they should, from a portfolio perspective, investors are very much protected

200
00:14:05,120 --> 00:14:08,780
because it's a very small part of the aggregate position.

201
00:14:08,780 --> 00:14:13,440
And that's why over our sort of six and a half years, we've never had a negative return

202
00:14:13,440 --> 00:14:14,880
from credit.

203
00:14:14,880 --> 00:14:20,440
So it's been very robust by spreading your bets, adding that diversification, having

204
00:14:20,440 --> 00:14:26,360
a security that you can rely on and having that strong alignment and interest.

205
00:14:26,360 --> 00:14:31,400
And also, to be honest, it's very much around just being active in managing these things.

206
00:14:31,400 --> 00:14:33,840
When we see there's an issue, we're on it straight away.

207
00:14:33,840 --> 00:14:37,260
I mean, this is all that we do.

208
00:14:37,260 --> 00:14:41,700
And that's sort of the squeaky wheel gets the oil.

209
00:14:41,700 --> 00:14:44,960
And that's very much how we work.

210
00:14:44,960 --> 00:14:47,600
Yes, a good bit of colour around that.

211
00:14:47,600 --> 00:14:53,760
So regarding duration, so a number of our clients really do like this lending space,

212
00:14:53,760 --> 00:14:54,760
both privately.

213
00:14:54,760 --> 00:14:59,280
A lot of our clients lend privately and also in markets.

214
00:14:59,280 --> 00:15:03,400
They always find durations the biggest thing because different risk profiles, as you can

215
00:15:03,400 --> 00:15:04,480
appreciate.

216
00:15:04,480 --> 00:15:09,920
So we're seeing a lot of people out there, a lot of fund managers looking for about 18

217
00:15:09,920 --> 00:15:14,760
months, like lock in, you know, quarterly and a couple out there for three years and

218
00:15:14,760 --> 00:15:17,640
a couple of the private ones are substantially longer.

219
00:15:17,640 --> 00:15:21,600
The phenomenal infrastructure assets are available.

220
00:15:21,600 --> 00:15:27,480
So the biggest question that I always get asked is how do you manage to have your redemptions

221
00:15:27,480 --> 00:15:30,240
only one month?

222
00:15:30,240 --> 00:15:33,960
Like you can be in and then out again within a month.

223
00:15:33,960 --> 00:15:36,720
How do you make that work?

224
00:15:36,720 --> 00:15:43,040
So there's I guess there's, you know, we have our own views on lockups.

225
00:15:43,040 --> 00:15:47,440
And I think it is they are appropriate in some circumstances.

226
00:15:47,440 --> 00:15:53,400
I do sometimes questions the motives of the manager and locking in that capital.

227
00:15:53,400 --> 00:15:58,600
But outside of that, there's really three lines of defence that we incorporate into

228
00:15:58,600 --> 00:16:03,860
how we construct the portfolio to give investors that liquidity.

229
00:16:03,860 --> 00:16:09,320
So the first one is the thousands of these underlying loans that are constantly being

230
00:16:09,320 --> 00:16:10,720
repaid.

231
00:16:10,720 --> 00:16:16,480
So on an ongoing basis, we're having money being returned to us and we're reinvesting

232
00:16:16,480 --> 00:16:19,840
that with new client monies that is coming in.

233
00:16:19,840 --> 00:16:24,980
If there is a redemption and an investor wants some money out, we can simply just invest

234
00:16:24,980 --> 00:16:28,960
less to meet those redemptions.

235
00:16:28,960 --> 00:16:34,160
And in a six and a half year track record, we've never not met a redemption even through

236
00:16:34,160 --> 00:16:38,320
what's been quite a sort of turbulent time over that period.

237
00:16:38,320 --> 00:16:42,960
The other feature of the fund is that we also keep target of five percent cash holdings.

238
00:16:42,960 --> 00:16:44,800
That's cash at banks.

239
00:16:44,800 --> 00:16:52,960
So that also promotes natural liquidity there to pay for redemptions as and when they occur.

240
00:16:52,960 --> 00:16:56,560
And then from a third perspective, we also very careful in how we sell the fund.

241
00:16:56,560 --> 00:16:58,520
This isn't an enhanced cash fund.

242
00:16:58,520 --> 00:17:02,160
We're not saying to people come in, come out month by month.

243
00:17:02,160 --> 00:17:05,480
This is very much a core holding investor portfolios.

244
00:17:05,480 --> 00:17:10,960
And we've been very deliberate in attracting investors that see it not as a piggy bank

245
00:17:10,960 --> 00:17:13,600
that can be raided whenever they want.

246
00:17:13,600 --> 00:17:16,320
But if they need liquidity, there is liquidity there.

247
00:17:16,320 --> 00:17:22,800
So I think those three things are very deliberate strategies by us, but do create that monthly

248
00:17:22,800 --> 00:17:27,480
ability to either come in or redeem from the fund.

249
00:17:27,480 --> 00:17:31,240
So since we're talking about the structure of the fund, one cheat question we always

250
00:17:31,240 --> 00:17:35,920
love to ask is essentially how are you remunerated?

251
00:17:35,920 --> 00:17:41,800
Because what we find by that question is an investor understanding exactly how you're

252
00:17:41,800 --> 00:17:46,920
remunerated means you know how you're aligned with the fund.

253
00:17:46,920 --> 00:17:52,560
So how does the remuneration structure work within the fund?

254
00:17:52,560 --> 00:17:57,640
So there's really a few elements to it.

255
00:17:57,640 --> 00:18:00,200
So firstly, all our fees are fully disclosed.

256
00:18:00,200 --> 00:18:02,080
There's no below the line fees.

257
00:18:02,080 --> 00:18:08,080
There's no sort of questionable tactics by us around the fees.

258
00:18:08,080 --> 00:18:11,800
We very much believe in that transparency.

259
00:18:11,800 --> 00:18:17,000
The fees that we charge is really broken down into two components.

260
00:18:17,000 --> 00:18:24,480
But at the starting point, we believe for a fund targeting the RBA cash rate plus 5%

261
00:18:24,480 --> 00:18:29,160
net of fees, a fee of 1% we think is fair.

262
00:18:29,160 --> 00:18:35,720
We think that's the right level that balances the effort involved first and the value we

263
00:18:35,720 --> 00:18:38,280
create to investors.

264
00:18:38,280 --> 00:18:40,600
That's kind of the natural balance.

265
00:18:40,600 --> 00:18:43,060
That's the right level of fees.

266
00:18:43,060 --> 00:18:49,960
So when we started the funds, we spoke to a lot of investors, both small and large.

267
00:18:49,960 --> 00:18:54,080
And what it was common is that they liked two things about a fee.

268
00:18:54,080 --> 00:18:57,940
They like to know that you can keep the lights on with a base fee.

269
00:18:57,940 --> 00:19:01,240
But secondly, they want to know there's an alignment there.

270
00:19:01,240 --> 00:19:03,600
So we've got the fee essentially split in half.

271
00:19:03,600 --> 00:19:11,660
So it's half a percent base fee and then 10% performance fee over the RBA cash rate.

272
00:19:11,660 --> 00:19:19,680
So essentially, if we deliver the RBA cash rate plus 5%, we're getting 10% of that 5%,

273
00:19:19,680 --> 00:19:22,400
which is another 50 basis points.

274
00:19:22,400 --> 00:19:27,780
And then there's a small expense recovery fee that just pays for some of the trust costs.

275
00:19:27,780 --> 00:19:31,760
So we think it's quite compelling because it does create alignment, but also gives the

276
00:19:31,760 --> 00:19:37,640
business stability that it needs to hire top talents, reinvest in infrastructure, technology,

277
00:19:37,640 --> 00:19:38,640
et cetera.

278
00:19:38,640 --> 00:19:44,640
We're talking off air, and I really hope you can elaborate more on this point regarding

279
00:19:44,640 --> 00:19:45,640
that structure.

280
00:19:45,640 --> 00:19:53,080
You were saying that you don't really have that high of a watermark in general because

281
00:19:53,080 --> 00:19:54,960
of what you're trying to achieve.

282
00:19:54,960 --> 00:19:59,560
You were saying something along the lines of if you put that in the current vehicle,

283
00:19:59,560 --> 00:20:03,360
then it might incentivize to take more risk in the portfolio, which is not what you're

284
00:20:03,360 --> 00:20:04,360
currently about.

285
00:20:04,360 --> 00:20:07,200
So do you mind just giving a bit of color around that?

286
00:20:07,200 --> 00:20:15,600
Yeah, so I believe it was in relation to talking about where the high watermark set.

287
00:20:15,600 --> 00:20:21,800
So having the benchmark that we outperform of the RBA cash rate can be seen as quite

288
00:20:21,800 --> 00:20:22,800
low.

289
00:20:22,800 --> 00:20:23,800
People say, well, why is it so low?

290
00:20:23,800 --> 00:20:30,280
And I guess for us, it's not why is it so low.

291
00:20:30,280 --> 00:20:35,080
You don't want to have it too high because some people will say, well, it should be over

292
00:20:35,080 --> 00:20:36,240
cash plus 5%.

293
00:20:36,240 --> 00:20:39,200
We should get a higher performance fee.

294
00:20:39,200 --> 00:20:46,200
And for us, all that does is incentivize additional risk taking when we're near cash plus 5 because

295
00:20:46,200 --> 00:20:49,760
we think, well, if we're just a bit over cash plus 5 and get all these great performance

296
00:20:49,760 --> 00:20:51,500
fees.

297
00:20:51,500 --> 00:20:56,840
And I think we've spent a lot of time thinking, how do you promote the right mindset right

298
00:20:56,840 --> 00:21:00,640
from inception to deliver the right results?

299
00:21:00,640 --> 00:21:07,400
And one thing we thought about is how do you fairly deliver an outcome for the business

300
00:21:07,400 --> 00:21:13,240
and our shareholders, but also make sure that we're not influenced in our investment decision

301
00:21:13,240 --> 00:21:15,620
making to think about that.

302
00:21:15,620 --> 00:21:20,640
So I don't know if that really answers it, but I guess it's making sure that we're not

303
00:21:20,640 --> 00:21:26,920
doing anything that incentivizes risk taking because that's exactly against what the core

304
00:21:26,920 --> 00:21:29,760
philosophy of the business is.

305
00:21:29,760 --> 00:21:31,320
Thank you very much for elaborating on that.

306
00:21:31,320 --> 00:21:34,480
Let's do a bit of a pivot to macroeconomics, always the fun part of the conversation.

307
00:21:34,480 --> 00:21:37,760
There's a lot happening in the industry right now.

308
00:21:37,760 --> 00:21:43,200
Past two years, huge amount of stimulus has been pumped in, then they took it all back.

309
00:21:43,200 --> 00:21:47,920
And there's a lot of commentators saying around town that if they increase rates by a particular

310
00:21:47,920 --> 00:21:50,980
amount, Armageddon might not be so bad.

311
00:21:50,980 --> 00:21:58,480
So what's your opinion on the rising rate environment we're currently seeing and how

312
00:21:58,480 --> 00:22:03,120
may that impact who you're lending against and the fund?

313
00:22:03,120 --> 00:22:04,760
I think you're exactly right.

314
00:22:04,760 --> 00:22:06,280
There's two elements to that.

315
00:22:06,280 --> 00:22:11,400
There's a commentary on what we think of the environment and then the second is implications

316
00:22:11,400 --> 00:22:12,400
for the fund.

317
00:22:12,400 --> 00:22:22,760
So if I can break it down accordingly, I think people are very... the reason why there's

318
00:22:22,760 --> 00:22:29,120
such rapid increase in cash rates globally and each country is unique in the factors

319
00:22:29,120 --> 00:22:34,320
that they face, but it's because there's such strong economic activity and growth and typically

320
00:22:34,320 --> 00:22:36,600
such low levels of unemployment.

321
00:22:36,600 --> 00:22:43,200
So the environment is actually from a fundamentals actually very, very strong and they're trying

322
00:22:43,200 --> 00:22:45,360
to cool that down.

323
00:22:45,360 --> 00:22:49,280
Whether there's a policy mistake and they get too aggressive in any one country and

324
00:22:49,280 --> 00:22:56,320
that has a domino effect or globally, central banks get too aggressive on managing inflation.

325
00:22:56,320 --> 00:23:02,240
That's a separate question, but right now we've got great fundamentals for lending and

326
00:23:02,240 --> 00:23:06,600
you can see that in a lot of the statistics where we've got very low rates of unemployment,

327
00:23:06,600 --> 00:23:08,600
3.5%.

328
00:23:08,600 --> 00:23:15,800
You've had a big shift from part-time to full-time employment, very strong rates of employment

329
00:23:15,800 --> 00:23:19,560
growth from females locally.

330
00:23:19,560 --> 00:23:25,760
So there's a lot of very good signals to say the employment market is very, very strong

331
00:23:25,760 --> 00:23:28,640
and that is very good for us.

332
00:23:28,640 --> 00:23:32,800
If you then look out and sort of think about some of the other factors, you've got declining

333
00:23:32,800 --> 00:23:39,960
consumer sentiment, business sentiment, investments, some of those sort of four-look indicators

334
00:23:39,960 --> 00:23:41,800
are a little bit more worrisome.

335
00:23:41,800 --> 00:23:50,480
So I guess from where we are, it's a very good environment, but it does highlight that

336
00:23:50,480 --> 00:23:55,000
we're at a little bit of a turning point now where we've had very strong level of stimulus,

337
00:23:55,000 --> 00:23:57,840
we've had very accommodative policy.

338
00:23:57,840 --> 00:24:02,960
The new environment isn't going to be the same as that and I think that just warrants

339
00:24:02,960 --> 00:24:07,520
that additional level of caution.

340
00:24:07,520 --> 00:24:11,160
I think there's some interesting things particularly that's going to happen globally.

341
00:24:11,160 --> 00:24:15,320
Everyone's very sort of fixated on the US and where they're at.

342
00:24:15,320 --> 00:24:19,600
I think Europe's going to be very interesting after a long period of zero interest rates.

343
00:24:19,600 --> 00:24:25,240
They're talking about potentially 150 basis point of cash rate increases before the end

344
00:24:25,240 --> 00:24:26,240
of the year.

345
00:24:26,240 --> 00:24:30,800
So that's going to be quite a big shift for them and we can already see other areas of

346
00:24:30,800 --> 00:24:33,940
Asia lifting rates aggressively.

347
00:24:33,940 --> 00:24:39,800
So from a macro perspective, I think you can't look backwards to think about what rhymes

348
00:24:39,800 --> 00:24:40,800
going forward.

349
00:24:40,800 --> 00:24:45,040
I think it's a new environment and I think investors need to be very cognizant of that

350
00:24:45,040 --> 00:24:51,320
and perhaps not just apply historical asset locations, but think more diligently about

351
00:24:51,320 --> 00:24:52,760
that.

352
00:24:52,760 --> 00:25:03,000
From a portfolio perspective, how we're thinking about it, in January we produced a client

353
00:25:03,000 --> 00:25:08,280
note and we talked about the different scenarios that we've been thinking through, stress testing,

354
00:25:08,280 --> 00:25:13,720
modelling, et cetera, one of them was a high interest rate, high inflationary environment.

355
00:25:13,720 --> 00:25:17,500
And that scenario is no longer a scenario, it's very much reality.

356
00:25:17,500 --> 00:25:23,040
So we've done a lot of work in positioning the portfolio for these rising interest rates

357
00:25:23,040 --> 00:25:27,400
and you can see this month we've delivered 55 basis points.

358
00:25:27,400 --> 00:25:33,780
So the benefits of that planning have very much come through into investor returns.

359
00:25:33,780 --> 00:25:38,080
I think going forward, we're very cognizant of the risks, we're very careful around that,

360
00:25:38,080 --> 00:25:45,080
but fundamentally a higher level of interest rates is good for us because it delivers typically

361
00:25:45,080 --> 00:25:48,320
a higher rate of return to our investors.

362
00:25:48,320 --> 00:25:53,600
So it's a very favourable environment if you make sure you're well prepared for it in advance

363
00:25:53,600 --> 00:25:59,520
and I think we've done a reasonable job at doing so.

364
00:25:59,520 --> 00:26:02,840
And that leads me into my last question.

365
00:26:02,840 --> 00:26:09,720
How long do you think this beautiful opportunity of what the bank has created by essentially

366
00:26:09,720 --> 00:26:15,480
saying we do not want this level of risk on our books, fund managers please take it, they've

367
00:26:15,480 --> 00:26:20,960
just opened up a door and a number of people like yourself have stepped in and our clients

368
00:26:20,960 --> 00:26:26,280
are very happy about it, but how long do you think they're going to keep this portal, I

369
00:26:26,280 --> 00:26:27,820
suppose, open for?

370
00:26:27,820 --> 00:26:32,240
Do you think it's going to be closed anytime soon or what do you think?

371
00:26:32,240 --> 00:26:36,240
It's funny, I think there's two things and I might challenge you on one thing there Murdoch

372
00:26:36,240 --> 00:26:46,800
and that is going back to the 65% LVR mortgage, I don't think that is particularly high risk.

373
00:26:46,800 --> 00:26:53,080
I think when you have an existing house, a common house in a common suburb where there's

374
00:26:53,080 --> 00:26:57,840
a high degree of liquidity, yes the property market's going through some changes, but at

375
00:26:57,840 --> 00:27:03,080
65% LVR I think you'd pretty readily find a buyer for that type of property.

376
00:27:03,080 --> 00:27:07,560
So I don't think it's around they're pushed outside the banking system because they're

377
00:27:07,560 --> 00:27:08,560
high risk.

378
00:27:08,560 --> 00:27:16,040
I think they're pushed outside the banking system because people typically they want

379
00:27:16,040 --> 00:27:19,000
two things, they want flexibility and they want speed.

380
00:27:19,000 --> 00:27:24,720
So a lot of the borrowers that are going to these non-banks, they're happy to pay away

381
00:27:24,720 --> 00:27:29,440
for greater flexibility because their situation might be unique.

382
00:27:29,440 --> 00:27:34,960
Or most commonly in this sector we're seeing people are buying a property and part of them

383
00:27:34,960 --> 00:27:39,840
getting a good deal on a property is that they can move very quickly.

384
00:27:39,840 --> 00:27:43,640
They can move quicker than other people that are bidding in the process and therefore secure

385
00:27:43,640 --> 00:27:49,640
the property, potentially at a discount, warranting paying higher interest rates.

386
00:27:49,640 --> 00:27:52,960
So I'm not convinced it's pushed outside the banking system.

387
00:27:52,960 --> 00:27:59,880
I just think maybe the banking system doesn't suit all participants and therefore it creates

388
00:27:59,880 --> 00:28:01,960
this opportunity.

389
00:28:01,960 --> 00:28:12,560
In terms of how long the windows open, lending has been around since the start of civilization.

390
00:28:12,560 --> 00:28:19,720
It's obviously the stamping of coins and so forth, but around that time there was elements

391
00:28:19,720 --> 00:28:26,440
of lending practices there so I don't see it lending and particularly non-bank lending

392
00:28:26,440 --> 00:28:29,880
to be a short-term occurrence.

393
00:28:29,880 --> 00:28:34,240
If anything I think it's just going to continue to grow and perhaps even resemble elements

394
00:28:34,240 --> 00:28:40,960
of the US system and Europe as well for that fact.

395
00:28:40,960 --> 00:28:47,440
Will there always be a need for participants like ourselves who are highly skilled, highly

396
00:28:47,440 --> 00:28:54,800
experienced in providing capital and who can move quickly and provide financing in a way

397
00:28:54,800 --> 00:28:58,720
that's attractive from an investor rate of return?

398
00:28:58,720 --> 00:29:00,840
I don't think that's going away.

399
00:29:00,840 --> 00:29:07,320
And secondly, from an investor perspective, will there continue to be a need to have a

400
00:29:07,320 --> 00:29:12,160
product that delivers strong income but has capital stability elements?

401
00:29:12,160 --> 00:29:15,000
I can't see that going away.

402
00:29:15,000 --> 00:29:20,320
So yes, we need to change and evolve with the market to stay relevant to our investors

403
00:29:20,320 --> 00:29:28,400
but I don't think this type of fund and the target market we're targeting will be going

404
00:29:28,400 --> 00:29:29,400
anywhere.

405
00:29:29,400 --> 00:29:33,760
In fact, we are experiencing incredible growth and that's been evident in that sort of six

406
00:29:33,760 --> 00:29:38,440
and a half years since we started.

407
00:29:38,440 --> 00:29:42,280
Well Josh, thank you very much for coming onto the Rate of Change and sharing your thoughts

408
00:29:42,280 --> 00:29:46,160
with us and I hope you have a great day.

409
00:29:46,160 --> 00:29:47,160
Thanks Murdoch, nice having you.

410
00:29:47,160 --> 00:29:48,160
Cheers.

411
00:29:48,160 --> 00:30:16,480
Cheers.

412
00:30:16,480 --> 00:30:20,480
Any reference to financial product does not constitute advice or recommendation and before

413
00:30:20,480 --> 00:30:24,440
any action you should seek proper advice from your financial professional.

414
00:30:24,440 --> 00:30:31,280
Australian listeners should head to www.moneysmart.gov.au to find more information on obtaining financial

415
00:30:31,280 --> 00:30:32,280
advice.

416
00:30:32,280 --> 00:30:47,720
If you want to get in touch with York, head to our website www.yorkwealth.com.au.

