WEBVTT

00:00:03.557 --> 00:00:10.517
This is the Convergent Science Network podcast. Leading researchers in the domain

00:00:10.517 --> 00:00:16.757
of neuroscience, brain theory and technology are interviewed by Paul Verschoor and Tony Prescott.

00:00:17.637 --> 00:00:21.897
It's Paul Verschoor with the Convergent Science Network podcast together with

00:00:21.897 --> 00:00:23.397
my colleague Tony Prescott.

00:00:23.457 --> 00:00:28.597
And we're here at the BCBT Summer School 2015 in Barcelona. And we're talking

00:00:28.597 --> 00:00:34.437
to Benny Hochner, who gave a talk this morning about his work on an amazing animal, the octopus.

00:00:36.997 --> 00:00:43.097
So, Benny, of course, we're very familiar with the octopus in different restaurants

00:00:43.097 --> 00:00:45.617
and so on, because of culinary experience.

00:00:46.137 --> 00:00:49.917
But why is an octopus so interesting also from a scientific perspective?

00:00:53.517 --> 00:00:59.937
Okay. Octopus is interesting from a scientific point of view for several reasons.

00:01:01.037 --> 00:01:04.457
First, it's the best example

00:01:04.457 --> 00:01:08.097
for invertebrate or animal that

00:01:08.097 --> 00:01:15.297
uses a soft body for doing motor or action with a very sophisticated control

00:01:15.297 --> 00:01:24.837
mechanism of this very complex computational task of controlling movement in flexible structure.

00:01:25.417 --> 00:01:34.397
And the second reason to the interest in the octopus is because octopus is considered

00:01:34.397 --> 00:01:39.297
to be the most intelligent invertebrate.

00:01:40.077 --> 00:01:47.677
And therefore, it's very interesting from a comparative viewpoint to see what has evolved.

00:01:48.677 --> 00:01:55.757
Independently in the octopus that enabled this high, what we can call cognitive

00:01:55.757 --> 00:01:58.717
capabilities of this animal.

00:01:58.717 --> 00:02:02.037
And by such a comparative approach,

00:02:02.317 --> 00:02:13.737
we may find the universal common mechanism which are important to the evolution

00:02:13.737 --> 00:02:21.557
of animal with cognitive capability and complex behavior.

00:02:22.557 --> 00:02:25.737
Okay. So one thing you emphasize is complex behavior.

00:02:26.037 --> 00:02:31.457
Yeah. So, what kind of behavior should we be thinking about for the octopus?

00:02:31.497 --> 00:02:34.557
What's the most complex behavior an octopus is capable of?

00:02:36.317 --> 00:02:40.977
This is a tough question for a human being.

00:02:41.057 --> 00:02:44.917
I think you should ask the octopus what is very different. No,

00:02:44.957 --> 00:02:49.617
but given that you are the ambassador of the octopus in this room, we're forced to ask you.

00:02:51.997 --> 00:02:52.477
So...

00:02:54.592 --> 00:03:02.832
If we speak about, for example, from a point of view of motor control in an

00:03:02.832 --> 00:03:07.332
animal which doesn't have any hard skeletal structure,

00:03:07.492 --> 00:03:19.652
that is able to do so much different forms of behavior, From swimming, to crawling,

00:03:19.972 --> 00:03:32.452
to walking, to hiding, to go through very narrow holes, to extend an arm into a target.

00:03:33.072 --> 00:03:40.552
This is a very, very, the repertoire of behavior is very amazing.

00:03:40.552 --> 00:03:47.132
And this is a predator animal with a very good visual system,

00:03:47.472 --> 00:03:53.832
and it's very sensitive to what's going on in the environment.

00:03:54.052 --> 00:04:08.092
And then it can organize its attack behavior and all of it with this flexible body.

00:04:09.672 --> 00:04:14.512
Another reason I think which I got from your talk as to why octopus is so interesting

00:04:14.512 --> 00:04:19.672
scientifically is that from the point of view of mammals or vertebrates,

00:04:19.732 --> 00:04:23.592
which is what we are, octopus is really quite an alien species.

00:04:24.232 --> 00:04:28.792
So we only share a common ancestor if you go a very long way back.

00:04:29.332 --> 00:04:36.232
So the interest in octopus is partly around how it has come up with sometimes

00:04:36.232 --> 00:04:42.452
convergent solutions to the problems it faces, where it faces similar problems to vertebrates,

00:04:42.512 --> 00:04:45.332
and in other ways, perhaps divergent solutions.

00:04:45.772 --> 00:04:53.412
Would you agree with that? Yeah, I think this is exactly what we find in our research.

00:04:53.672 --> 00:05:03.432
And interestingly, we study both motor control and learning memory in this animal.

00:05:03.792 --> 00:05:08.132
So on one side, because of this flexibility of the body and soft body.

00:05:09.158 --> 00:05:13.638
We find a very unique solution, evolution solution.

00:05:14.718 --> 00:05:21.258
To this big problem of controlling the flexible body, while on the other side,

00:05:21.318 --> 00:05:26.998
in learning memory, we find in the brain an area which is very similar to our hippocampus,

00:05:27.618 --> 00:05:36.418
not only by structure, but also, for example, by its very robust long-term potentiation,

00:05:36.418 --> 00:05:38.998
activity-dependent long-term potentiation,

00:05:39.338 --> 00:05:45.358
which is probably a common mechanism to mediate changes in the nervous system,

00:05:45.478 --> 00:05:51.678
which is the basis for long-term learning and memory.

00:05:52.038 --> 00:05:55.458
So there may be some convergence in these more cognitive functions.

00:05:55.718 --> 00:05:59.538
Yes. But the divergence that you're seeing in motor control,

00:05:59.778 --> 00:06:05.138
some of that you then put down to the very different morphology of the octopus,

00:06:05.138 --> 00:06:11.518
purpose, that it has no internal skeleton, it's just made of soft parts, and that then,

00:06:12.298 --> 00:06:16.158
enforces a different way of solving the problem of controlling limbs?

00:06:16.718 --> 00:06:21.618
I think yes, because it creates two main problems that I would define.

00:06:21.938 --> 00:06:27.878
One is that a soft structure has infinitely large degrees of freedom.

00:06:29.180 --> 00:06:36.140
That the animal has, the control system has to control while doing a certain task.

00:06:36.940 --> 00:06:42.100
For example, in our arm, we have only seven degrees of freedom,

00:06:42.300 --> 00:06:49.440
which is relatively easy to solve, and this is due to the skeletal structure of our arm.

00:06:49.800 --> 00:06:57.640
When you have an arm without any rigid steltron, any joint, this can do any

00:06:57.640 --> 00:07:01.100
movement into any direction, elongate, bend,

00:07:01.520 --> 00:07:07.380
shortening, twisting, and the octopus uses this kind of movement.

00:07:07.520 --> 00:07:18.900
So it has to evolve a completely different approach to solve this complexity and how to use it.

00:07:20.600 --> 00:07:25.280
To produce a goal-directed, for example, a goal-directed movement.

00:07:26.140 --> 00:07:30.420
Just to push you on that, I mean, although I have only seven joints in my arm,

00:07:30.520 --> 00:07:33.480
I still have many ways of reaching to a given point in space.

00:07:33.740 --> 00:07:38.680
So I have the same problem of redundancy of degrees of freedom,

00:07:38.800 --> 00:07:43.360
not to the same extent as the octopus, but I still have to reduce the degrees

00:07:43.360 --> 00:07:45.880
of freedom and I do that by exploiting synergies.

00:07:46.080 --> 00:07:49.700
And isn't there some convergence, Maybe in the way that the octopus is also

00:07:49.700 --> 00:07:50.760
finding things. I think this is right.

00:07:51.920 --> 00:07:58.680
Also, what we find in the octopus is that in certain kinds of behavior,

00:07:59.100 --> 00:08:06.120
and this is, I think, a great achievement of the octopus, it can use all its degrees of freedom.

00:08:06.340 --> 00:08:11.620
For example, if the arm is as if it behaves by itself when it's searching the

00:08:11.620 --> 00:08:17.640
surrounding and looking for and saving as a probe, then it can let the arm loose

00:08:17.640 --> 00:08:21.300
and do whatever it likes according to the to some uh.

00:08:23.670 --> 00:08:28.870
Motor primitives that are embedded in the arm itself, while when goal-directed

00:08:28.870 --> 00:08:37.310
movement, the octopus has to use a way to reduce the number of degrees of freedom to only very few.

00:08:37.570 --> 00:08:42.490
So for example, if the octopus reached to a target, use only three degrees of freedom.

00:08:43.010 --> 00:08:51.810
One which took, sorry, which control the propagation of a bend in the arm toward

00:08:51.810 --> 00:08:57.990
the target, and the two others just to control the direction of the arm in space.

00:08:58.850 --> 00:09:06.190
Similarly, when the octopus gets food with one of its suckers along the arm,

00:09:06.290 --> 00:09:12.990
and it wants to bring the food to the mouse, it creates an articulated structure from its arm.

00:09:13.150 --> 00:09:18.270
He reshapes its arm into an articulated structure, and then it can bring the

00:09:18.270 --> 00:09:25.590
food to its mouse very accurately, similarly in the ways that we are doing this behavior.

00:09:26.670 --> 00:09:34.210
But in our case, it's embedded in our skeletal structure, while in the octopus,

00:09:34.410 --> 00:09:37.290
it's basically embedded in the motor program.

00:09:38.350 --> 00:09:46.570
He uses a certain way to reshape its arm into an articular structure,

00:09:46.570 --> 00:09:47.810
structure, which is a dynamic,

00:09:48.030 --> 00:09:53.290
can be dynamically adjusted to the site where the octopus got the target and

00:09:53.290 --> 00:09:57.230
bring the target accurately to the mouse.

00:09:57.430 --> 00:10:03.570
But you use the same mechanism, the same strategy of doing accurate point-to-point movement.

00:10:03.610 --> 00:10:09.690
Now before we delve into your own research on the behavior and the control of

00:10:09.690 --> 00:10:11.370
these arms by a neocupist.

00:10:12.730 --> 00:10:18.250
So is it actually even useful to still talk about degrees of freedom in this case?

00:10:18.750 --> 00:10:24.930
Should we just forget about that because it's practically an infinite set of

00:10:24.930 --> 00:10:26.790
control points it can work with?

00:10:27.990 --> 00:10:31.810
To what extent is it really helpful to talk about degrees of freedom from that

00:10:31.810 --> 00:10:38.630
perspective? I think it's good from the point of view that you set to yourself

00:10:38.630 --> 00:10:41.790
the problem, what the problems the octopus has to deal with.

00:10:43.270 --> 00:10:49.110
And what he has to deal with is to control many degrees of freedom.

00:10:49.110 --> 00:10:54.190
I don't think the octopus knows about this many degrees of freedom because it's

00:10:54.190 --> 00:10:58.970
embedded in his evolution and his structure and self-organization of his nervous

00:10:58.970 --> 00:11:01.730
system to be able to use this.

00:11:03.290 --> 00:11:10.210
Uh, many degrees of freedom and to collapse them in only few degrees of freedom

00:11:10.210 --> 00:11:15.870
by doing stereotypical movement, which suit this kind of flexible structure.

00:11:17.390 --> 00:11:25.770
And it's also, um, constrained by how, how complex the motor,

00:11:25.810 --> 00:11:28.090
the motor command can be to the muscle.

00:11:28.090 --> 00:11:34.410
For example, a simple motor command to a muscular hydrosat like the octopus

00:11:34.410 --> 00:11:42.410
arm, where the arm is organizing longitudinal and transversal orientation of muscle fiber,

00:11:42.630 --> 00:11:48.550
the activation of both muscles together, to the same extent, creates stiffening.

00:11:49.330 --> 00:11:55.090
So, this is a very simple motor program. The brain has just to give the motor

00:11:55.090 --> 00:11:58.810
neurons in the arm command to have the same output.

00:11:59.370 --> 00:12:05.610
And this is enough to create the stiffening. And then you can use a rather simple,

00:12:05.670 --> 00:12:11.250
I think, motor program to propagate this stiffening along the arm.

00:12:11.410 --> 00:12:14.830
And this can create the reaching movement very simply,

00:12:14.850 --> 00:12:17.910
not only by the degree of

00:12:17.910 --> 00:12:20.850
freedom they need to be controlled in to produce the movement

00:12:20.850 --> 00:12:24.130
but but also a very simple motor

00:12:24.130 --> 00:12:27.950
program to activate the the the

00:12:27.950 --> 00:12:31.010
reaching but before you look at the motor program

00:12:31.010 --> 00:12:35.210
what is what is interesting about the octopus among many things it's like a

00:12:35.210 --> 00:12:39.190
mollusk that that escaped from its shell i mean in phylogenetically it sits

00:12:39.190 --> 00:12:44.250
in this family with a phylum of mollusks and right its Its closest neighbors

00:12:44.250 --> 00:12:49.450
in that phylum are actually really simple animals that live in a shell. Right.

00:12:49.890 --> 00:12:52.390
So, what are the...

00:12:53.837 --> 00:12:59.597
What are the differences between the octopus and the other animals in that phylum?

00:12:59.697 --> 00:13:03.797
Like if you look at the nervous system of a mollusk and an octopus,

00:13:04.137 --> 00:13:04.977
what are the differences?

00:13:05.397 --> 00:13:10.737
First of all, there is a big difference in the size of the nervous system.

00:13:11.097 --> 00:13:20.717
The octopus nervous system contains half a billion neurons, while a garden snail

00:13:20.717 --> 00:13:25.217
may have a few tens of thousands of neurons.

00:13:25.617 --> 00:13:29.157
So there is a big difference in cell number.

00:13:29.657 --> 00:13:35.257
And also what we see is that there is a huge difference in the way the nervous

00:13:35.257 --> 00:13:38.237
system is organized in the body.

00:13:40.577 --> 00:13:45.577
Both in the simple animal and in the octopus, the nervous system is organized

00:13:45.577 --> 00:13:51.597
to maximize the efficiency of the nervous system controlling different parts of the body.

00:13:51.777 --> 00:13:57.697
So for example, in the octopus, the majority of nerve cells are situated already

00:13:57.697 --> 00:14:01.037
in the peripheral nervous system of the arm.

00:14:01.677 --> 00:14:06.057
This fits what we are finding in the behavior in our physiological studies,

00:14:06.097 --> 00:14:13.377
that many of of the motor program are generated at the level of the neuromuscular system of the arm.

00:14:13.537 --> 00:14:20.037
So basically, the central brain, which contains only 50 million neurons,

00:14:21.934 --> 00:14:27.334
actually need to process information and set command to the peripheral nervous

00:14:27.334 --> 00:14:32.954
system how to produce stereotypical arm movement.

00:14:33.734 --> 00:14:36.514
Now, the main difference really is that.

00:14:38.634 --> 00:14:45.934
Lower invertebrate mollusks depend on their protection on their shell.

00:14:46.154 --> 00:14:52.414
The shell is a very nice protection. I should mention that mollusks have another

00:14:52.414 --> 00:14:57.834
way of protecting themselves, and they are a very rich source for all kinds of toxins.

00:14:58.214 --> 00:15:02.194
So they are a very efficient, let's say,

00:15:02.374 --> 00:15:12.314
factory of biochemicals or things that can help us in studying the nervous system

00:15:12.314 --> 00:15:18.734
because they block ion channels and receptors and so forth.

00:15:19.854 --> 00:15:25.054
So they used this kind of defense mechanism.

00:15:26.294 --> 00:15:33.294
And the octopus lost his protecting shell and became to be a freely moving animal,

00:15:33.494 --> 00:15:40.054
a predator, that depends very much on its visual system.

00:15:40.054 --> 00:15:45.054
Them and losing the shell,

00:15:45.294 --> 00:15:51.294
enable the animal, the heavy shell, enable the animal to become such a freely

00:15:51.294 --> 00:15:53.934
moving and really during the

00:15:53.934 --> 00:16:00.274
revolutions they actually compete with fishes at the time of evolution.

00:16:00.974 --> 00:16:05.614
But is there anything conserved there? If we go from mollusks to snail to octopus,

00:16:05.914 --> 00:16:11.154
is there anything conserved when we think go up into complexity?

00:16:11.994 --> 00:16:17.694
I think this is a very good question. I used to work on.

00:16:20.274 --> 00:16:27.874
Plesia californica, together with Professor Eric Kandel, on the basic mechanism

00:16:27.874 --> 00:16:30.374
of learning memory in this animal.

00:16:30.634 --> 00:16:35.674
So for me particularly, it's very interesting to see if the simple,

00:16:36.634 --> 00:16:40.994
mechanisms that exist in the aplysia for

00:16:40.994 --> 00:16:43.934
mediating simple form of learning and memory

00:16:43.934 --> 00:16:47.334
in the reflex of the

00:16:47.334 --> 00:16:55.494
defense reflex of this animal are conserved or completely different mechanisms

00:16:55.494 --> 00:17:05.914
that is converging with our brain has been evolved in the octopus. and what we find that.

00:17:07.233 --> 00:17:14.893
No. In the octopus, there are still mechanisms which are more likely to what

00:17:14.893 --> 00:17:17.793
takes place in other mollusks.

00:17:18.333 --> 00:17:27.293
But interestingly, they have been modified a lot in order to establish a new cellular mechanism.

00:17:27.293 --> 00:17:35.153
So I mentioned before the mechanism of activity-dependent long-term potentiation,

00:17:35.333 --> 00:17:41.493
which I think it's the universal cellular mechanism for mediating learning memory.

00:17:41.493 --> 00:17:47.773
Memory, but the molecular mechanism that mediates this long-term potentiation

00:17:47.773 --> 00:18:00.913
in the octopus brain is mediated by a mechanism which is conserved from other mollusks,

00:18:01.033 --> 00:18:01.933
but it was

00:18:02.093 --> 00:18:11.133
modified to do this kind of long-term potentiation as a cellular process.

00:18:12.233 --> 00:18:17.873
But doesn't, in some sense, it makes the octopus a strange exception in its

00:18:17.873 --> 00:18:22.053
phylum, but also a bit annoying because also as you described in your talk,

00:18:22.133 --> 00:18:25.273
you looked at the evolution of the eye.

00:18:26.313 --> 00:18:30.293
The octopus eye, eye which shares many properties with the human eye which

00:18:30.293 --> 00:18:33.413
is is is sort of suggesting that the

00:18:33.413 --> 00:18:37.433
common ancestor is is way beyond uh

00:18:37.433 --> 00:18:45.573
a very very early in in phylogeny so um doesn't that really mean that that from

00:18:45.573 --> 00:18:50.733
a genetic perspective uh also these very simple organisms are actually carrying

00:18:50.733 --> 00:18:54.513
a lot of additional information that they share with us,

00:18:54.573 --> 00:18:59.153
way beyond just the basics of cellular mechanisms and so on.

00:18:59.353 --> 00:19:03.453
Yeah, I think this is completely true. And I think it fits.

00:19:03.993 --> 00:19:09.633
First of all, with the idea that what we find is, you know, the number of genes

00:19:09.633 --> 00:19:15.193
in our, or in octopus, is not that many.

00:19:15.193 --> 00:19:25.653
Actually, probably there are rather basic building blocks of genes that the

00:19:25.653 --> 00:19:30.053
first living creature already had when it developed.

00:19:30.433 --> 00:19:41.293
So now for analyzing a light, you have molecules that can be shared by plants,

00:19:41.653 --> 00:19:53.133
by animals, and by eyes and by other creatures that are using light to do all

00:19:53.133 --> 00:19:57.753
kinds of camera photosynthesis and things like this,

00:19:57.853 --> 00:20:01.633
and they are built to the world.

00:20:05.514 --> 00:20:12.094
To collect light? To collect photons? No, to...

00:20:13.594 --> 00:20:14.994
Transform? Transform.

00:20:16.754 --> 00:20:21.374
Converge? Transform light into... Electrical signals. Yeah.

00:20:22.654 --> 00:20:26.854
Transduce, maybe. Transduce. Transduce. Transform.

00:20:27.854 --> 00:20:31.574
Anyway. Transduction. It's called the transduction mechanism.

00:20:32.274 --> 00:20:40.194
Okay. okay so now we have a bit an idea about the octopus it's really a very

00:20:40.194 --> 00:20:44.934
strange almost an alien species that sort of got plunked into a phylogeny but

00:20:44.934 --> 00:20:50.354
still it shares properties with even with us now it controls this very strange body,

00:20:51.114 --> 00:20:52.714
it has eight arms,

00:20:53.674 --> 00:20:59.574
controlled by complex ganglia that again talk to a central brain what do we

00:20:59.574 --> 00:21:05.054
know about this ganglia what do the ganglia do that are linked to a single arm?

00:21:05.234 --> 00:21:09.334
The ganglia in the arm or the ganglia in the brain?

00:21:09.794 --> 00:21:13.714
No, the ganglia in the arm. So I want to start at the periphery. Yeah.

00:21:14.854 --> 00:21:22.134
Actually we don't know much about the ganglia in the arm, about the function of the arm.

00:21:22.234 --> 00:21:29.714
We know that there are motor neurons which are innervating about 400,000 motor

00:21:29.714 --> 00:21:33.554
neurons on in each arms that are innovating very every.

00:21:36.617 --> 00:21:45.577
Every hundred micron, the muscles that run along the arm, and each muscle is

00:21:45.577 --> 00:21:51.557
innervated by three types of motor neurons that have different properties.

00:21:51.877 --> 00:21:56.817
But we don't know exactly what's going on in the arm in terms of the computational

00:21:56.817 --> 00:22:01.037
properties of this structure, the reflexive behavior.

00:22:01.037 --> 00:22:04.677
We know that there is some input from

00:22:04.677 --> 00:22:08.357
proprioceptive into the central nervous

00:22:08.357 --> 00:22:11.357
system of the arm but we don't know exactly what how

00:22:11.357 --> 00:22:14.857
it's activated the for example the the reflex

00:22:14.857 --> 00:22:22.097
of the suckers or the or the bending or any other function of the of the arm

00:22:22.097 --> 00:22:33.017
we know better due to many not not our work but the the people in Wells and J.Z.

00:22:33.017 --> 00:22:36.957
Young and other people that work mainly in Napoli,

00:22:37.117 --> 00:22:43.957
they studied the structure of the central brain and they found very interestingly

00:22:43.957 --> 00:22:45.977
that the brain is organized still,

00:22:46.077 --> 00:22:52.337
it's very very centralized, but it's still composed of lobes,

00:22:52.457 --> 00:22:53.077
of ganglia.

00:22:54.037 --> 00:23:02.637
And by stimulating and by lesioning, they could assign a more or less specific

00:23:02.637 --> 00:23:06.177
function for different lobes.

00:23:06.477 --> 00:23:14.097
And this is what makes us interested in this central brain, because we think

00:23:14.097 --> 00:23:18.377
that the separation between the periphery and the central processes,

00:23:18.777 --> 00:23:25.257
the central brain seems to be dealing more with cognitive function.

00:23:25.957 --> 00:23:32.177
We think it's an ideal preparation to study these processes because it's separated

00:23:32.177 --> 00:23:36.597
from the input and the output structure.

00:23:37.557 --> 00:23:43.437
And in vertebrate brains, you might look at sort of the spinal cord as being

00:23:43.437 --> 00:23:48.897
doing a lot of this motor sensory stuff and processing things locally.

00:23:49.737 --> 00:23:56.257
And then brainstem perhaps doing some more of that and then midbrain and forebrain

00:23:56.257 --> 00:23:58.457
doing these more higher executive functions.

00:23:58.737 --> 00:24:02.937
Yeah. Sort of deciding what are targets for movement and then executing movements.

00:24:03.257 --> 00:24:08.957
I mean, does that kind of way of thinking about the decomposition of the nervous

00:24:08.957 --> 00:24:10.577
system work at all for Octopus?

00:24:10.577 --> 00:24:19.777
I think yes, but actually you can look at the nervous system of the arm,

00:24:19.817 --> 00:24:24.157
the arm nerve cord, as a spinal cord.

00:24:25.653 --> 00:24:30.133
But it's much more elaborated than, for example, our spinal cord,

00:24:30.273 --> 00:24:39.293
because of the special separation of labor between the central nervous system and the peripheral one.

00:24:39.973 --> 00:24:44.253
The peripheral one has a lot of function of its own, and therefore,

00:24:44.533 --> 00:24:51.273
although we treat it as a peripheral nervous system, it's very elaborated in

00:24:51.273 --> 00:24:56.053
its organization because its function, both in processing sensory information,

00:24:57.153 --> 00:25:00.033
and activating motor program.

00:25:01.433 --> 00:25:03.353
Is very rich.

00:25:04.653 --> 00:25:09.233
But if you take the head off a chicken or you decorticate a cat,

00:25:09.313 --> 00:25:13.133
they can still generate rhythmic motions, run on a treadmill,

00:25:13.953 --> 00:25:16.113
these sorts of things. So is there a parallel there?

00:25:16.453 --> 00:25:20.413
So I understand that the arm can do a lot of autonomous behavior.

00:25:20.973 --> 00:25:28.413
Yeah, so for example, For example, the central brain is divided into two parts,

00:25:28.573 --> 00:25:33.913
one which is above the oesophagus, which is called the supraesophageal part

00:25:33.913 --> 00:25:38.033
of the brain, and there is a lower part which is the subesophageal part.

00:25:38.393 --> 00:25:46.073
So the subesophageal part is really like the brainstem is more like dealing

00:25:46.073 --> 00:25:50.073
with the vegetative function of the body,

00:25:50.333 --> 00:25:53.433
like breathing and other very,

00:25:54.493 --> 00:25:56.013
basic reflex.

00:25:56.333 --> 00:26:01.933
And the upper part of the brain, the superesophageal part, is more...

00:26:02.913 --> 00:26:08.373
Here is where the learning memory centers are organized, and the higher motor

00:26:08.373 --> 00:26:09.713
control center is organized.

00:26:10.233 --> 00:26:19.673
And so if you can create a decerebrated octopus by removing only this part of

00:26:19.673 --> 00:26:22.253
the brain. And then you find that there is some.

00:26:23.808 --> 00:26:27.708
Reflexes that are coordinated between the arms.

00:26:28.348 --> 00:26:34.408
For example, if you take such a dis-erebrated octopus and you hold one of its

00:26:34.408 --> 00:26:42.108
arms, you will find that the rest of the arm is coming to help the taken arm.

00:26:42.348 --> 00:26:52.048
So there is a lot of coordination taken also at the lower level of the central nervous system.

00:26:52.048 --> 00:27:03.248
And this area has this very basic surviving properties of the central nervous system.

00:27:03.568 --> 00:27:10.568
So I think you're right that it's organized in more or less similar hierarchy

00:27:10.568 --> 00:27:17.608
of responsibility, let's say, of the animal behavior.

00:27:18.788 --> 00:27:23.948
So then so we could call these reflexes of the octopus this would be a typical

00:27:23.948 --> 00:27:29.208
defensive reflex one arm gets stuck and you pull the other arms towards it right

00:27:29.208 --> 00:27:35.328
but now if we go further down and let's say now we,

00:27:35.908 --> 00:27:41.568
also we just sever an arm what can a single arm still do?

00:27:42.568 --> 00:27:48.028
Arm can do a lot especially if you if you you.

00:27:50.220 --> 00:27:53.460
Encourage it to do something like, like, you know, like, uh,

00:27:53.660 --> 00:27:59.380
like bringing a piece of food into the sucker, uh, the arm can continue to survive

00:27:59.380 --> 00:28:05.200
about half an hour in, uh, in a isolated, in, in, in normal seawater.

00:28:05.520 --> 00:28:11.820
And the, and the, and the, um, and the arm will grab the food and will behave as,

00:28:11.860 --> 00:28:25.860
as, as really it's bringing it, maybe even bringing it back to the place where the mouse is.

00:28:26.300 --> 00:28:34.160
Actually, in 1971, there was a paper in Nature by Jennifer Altman,

00:28:34.380 --> 00:28:38.980
who described that the octopus can bring food,

00:28:38.980 --> 00:28:42.100
an isolated arm can bring food toward

00:28:42.100 --> 00:28:45.060
the mouse by moving it along the

00:28:45.060 --> 00:28:47.960
suckers and if you put an acid or

00:28:47.960 --> 00:28:51.160
something on this food and put it on the arm again it will

00:28:51.160 --> 00:28:58.560
move it outward so when we started we we already had some ideas that there is

00:28:58.560 --> 00:29:09.260
a lot of autonomy in the behavior of the of the arm itself so but now you What you also showed is that,

00:29:09.360 --> 00:29:15.420
so there is some sense of, let's say, hierarchical organization of this motor system.

00:29:16.240 --> 00:29:20.080
But then if you go look for, let's say, the organization of,

00:29:20.100 --> 00:29:23.420
let's say, the control signals of that in the central brain,

00:29:23.740 --> 00:29:26.920
it looks surprisingly, let's say, disorganized.

00:29:27.340 --> 00:29:30.600
So you don't find a somatotopic map, right?

00:29:30.760 --> 00:29:34.180
You don't find that, let's say, arms are represented in some coherent,

00:29:34.300 --> 00:29:38.200
at least so far, no one has found that. Yeah. So how do you interpret that?

00:29:40.220 --> 00:29:49.200
I think this fits the idea that in order to control a flexible structure,

00:29:49.580 --> 00:30:00.740
you cannot use what we use to define as a conventional mechanism by representing the body,

00:30:00.860 --> 00:30:05.340
the body part in the brain, and use it as an input to a system that will,

00:30:05.420 --> 00:30:11.820
together with the sensory information that is also represented in a somatotopic way,

00:30:12.560 --> 00:30:15.780
will integrate into initiation of command.

00:30:17.335 --> 00:30:23.675
And this is because it's very hard to envisage a way that such,

00:30:23.895 --> 00:30:32.495
let's say, 300 suckers along the arm will be, and each arm, an eight arm,

00:30:32.635 --> 00:30:37.215
will be represented in a specific location in the brain.

00:30:37.315 --> 00:30:41.535
I think it's a lot of information. So, the octopus,

00:30:41.655 --> 00:30:48.715
I think, solved this problem by that in the brain what is represented is what

00:30:48.715 --> 00:30:55.415
kind of behavior the higher motor center should induce as a response to some

00:30:55.415 --> 00:30:58.615
specific input, sensory input.

00:30:58.915 --> 00:31:04.555
So the brain is organized in what we think, we have to test it yet,

00:31:04.695 --> 00:31:08.535
in a more of motor or program organization.

00:31:09.655 --> 00:31:14.635
But it is in some sense doing something a little bit like conventional sort

00:31:14.635 --> 00:31:19.715
of inverse kinematics so that in order to solve this problem of reaching to a point in space,

00:31:20.035 --> 00:31:25.015
it has to, as you explained, reduce the degrees of freedom in the arm and make

00:31:25.015 --> 00:31:31.515
it to a number of relatively rigid parts with joints in between them.

00:31:31.655 --> 00:31:36.455
And then you can imagine that the brain is doing some inverse kinematics in

00:31:36.455 --> 00:31:41.655
order to work out how to control that reduced degree of freedom system to reach a point.

00:31:42.035 --> 00:31:44.375
Yeah. So, yeah.

00:31:45.295 --> 00:31:49.315
So, this is what is happening in the system.

00:31:49.655 --> 00:31:54.375
Yeah. But in that case, wouldn't you expect something sort of convergent about

00:31:54.375 --> 00:31:58.595
the control of these high-level structures compared to, for instance,

00:31:59.015 --> 00:32:01.215
the mammalian motor cortex?

00:32:01.975 --> 00:32:06.455
Isn't the control of my arm solving something of a similar problem if I'm reaching

00:32:06.455 --> 00:32:08.575
to a point in space guided by a vision?

00:32:12.055 --> 00:32:19.615
Reaching is different than what we are doing. Right.

00:32:20.155 --> 00:32:25.355
So the motor program, the behavior is completely different than what we are

00:32:25.355 --> 00:32:30.315
doing, and this is taking advantage of the flexibility of the arm.

00:32:30.595 --> 00:32:38.395
Because reaching to a target by propagating a wave wave of activation and bends

00:32:38.395 --> 00:32:41.495
that propagate through the arms, it's something that we cannot do.

00:32:41.875 --> 00:32:47.235
Right. But the command to induce this kind of behavior might be very simple.

00:32:47.535 --> 00:33:00.155
It just has to activate this wave of stiffening muscles that will push the arm toward the target.

00:33:01.546 --> 00:33:06.066
But if it would be so easy, I'm sure I would have been able to fully understand

00:33:06.066 --> 00:33:08.446
it. And there's still something missing in that picture, right?

00:33:08.626 --> 00:33:14.086
So, for instance, what is then also strange, if there's no smetotopy to the

00:33:14.086 --> 00:33:16.726
organization of the motor neurons,

00:33:17.526 --> 00:33:23.326
you could still maybe expect that in terms of the haptic information that the

00:33:23.326 --> 00:33:27.486
central brain receives from the different arms, that since this would express

00:33:27.486 --> 00:33:29.306
some topological organization,

00:33:30.106 --> 00:33:33.466
might be reflected in a topological map of the body.

00:33:33.566 --> 00:33:38.326
But since you haven't found it, does that maybe imply that the sensory information

00:33:38.326 --> 00:33:40.226
never reaches the central brain?

00:33:40.746 --> 00:33:45.386
Is that possible? That the central brain only knows something about what let's

00:33:45.386 --> 00:33:50.046
say the ganglia tell it at sort of a very abstract level about the arm,

00:33:50.106 --> 00:33:51.346
like, oh, the arm is still there.

00:33:51.486 --> 00:33:55.666
Yeah. But it doesn't receive more detailed information from all the suckers, for instance.

00:33:55.886 --> 00:34:04.046
So I think to answer your question, I think there are some behavioral experiments

00:34:04.046 --> 00:34:10.666
that have been done by Wells in Napoli,

00:34:11.306 --> 00:34:15.426
and they show that, for example, octopus, you can train octopus very nicely

00:34:15.426 --> 00:34:18.066
to do tactile discrimination.

00:34:18.966 --> 00:34:27.686
But you cannot train an octopus to do with one arm one task and with the other arm, different task.

00:34:28.226 --> 00:34:33.206
The training, the learning is general to the entire arm.

00:34:33.926 --> 00:34:39.506
To all arm? To all arm. So if I learn a tactile discrimination with arm number

00:34:39.506 --> 00:34:42.446
one, I can also do it with arm number three? It will be generalized to all other

00:34:42.446 --> 00:34:44.586
arms. So that would mean central brain is involved.

00:34:45.466 --> 00:34:52.426
Yes, of course, it's involved in the learning, but it's not involved in the specific arm.

00:34:53.846 --> 00:35:00.906
But still, no one has found some sort of somatotopic map of that in the central brain? No.

00:35:02.716 --> 00:35:09.136
Not yet. And similarly, for example, is with motor command.

00:35:09.916 --> 00:35:16.016
When octopus extend arm or several arm together, it never extend one arm in

00:35:16.016 --> 00:35:22.396
a higher speed and the other one with a smaller one, with a slower speed.

00:35:22.396 --> 00:35:30.816
It always will have the same speed as if a real, a single program has been evolved.

00:35:31.096 --> 00:35:36.796
And maybe there is a gating mechanism that determine at the lower level which

00:35:36.796 --> 00:35:41.776
arm will be activated by this motor program.

00:35:42.756 --> 00:35:50.236
But now, about the sensory representation of let's say touch,

00:35:50.376 --> 00:35:52.316
haptic information that comes from these arms,

00:35:52.536 --> 00:35:58.016
people have looked for that and also found the same kind of broad distribution

00:35:58.016 --> 00:36:03.096
in the central brain, or people have just not really looked for it yet in detail?

00:36:05.956 --> 00:36:12.736
What I have showed today is that when we record from the central brain,

00:36:12.836 --> 00:36:15.116
from the higher motor center,

00:36:15.416 --> 00:36:26.676
we find that there is no specific representation of specific area in the body in the center brain.

00:36:26.876 --> 00:36:29.236
But wait, I thought that was with respect to motor action.

00:36:29.476 --> 00:36:32.376
What you showed us is for different movements, right?

00:36:32.796 --> 00:36:44.336
No, but what we have shown also is that if you record from this side in the,

00:36:45.116 --> 00:36:50.916
in the higher motor center in the brain, and you stimulate tactically different

00:36:50.916 --> 00:36:54.076
parts of the body, you can get.

00:36:55.965 --> 00:36:59.545
Response from different area in the body.

00:37:00.145 --> 00:37:04.365
So if you get the response from one arm, you will get from the other arm and

00:37:04.365 --> 00:37:08.085
even from the mantle or from the sacral.

00:37:08.505 --> 00:37:16.625
So there is no, it seems that the conventional representation doesn't exist in between.

00:37:16.705 --> 00:37:23.365
It still might be that this information is presented in different units that

00:37:23.365 --> 00:37:27.845
are activated by by uh but you you would at this point in time given what you know say,

00:37:28.785 --> 00:37:31.945
both the direct to the somatosensory processing and

00:37:31.945 --> 00:37:38.065
motor control there is no no somatotopic exactly yeah organization yeah all

00:37:38.065 --> 00:37:42.345
right so and that can also lead you to this point that that you pushed rather

00:37:42.345 --> 00:37:48.245
strongly in your presentation that the octopus is able to generate these complex

00:37:48.245 --> 00:37:51.465
complex behaviors without a map of its body.

00:37:53.005 --> 00:37:58.565
So now I could argue with that by saying, well, one, you just haven't found it yet.

00:37:58.645 --> 00:38:02.705
And the organization is such that it is not easy to interpret.

00:38:02.865 --> 00:38:04.005
So there's still a body representation.

00:38:04.565 --> 00:38:08.965
Yeah. Because in some sense, you do see that the central brain is involved in controlling the body.

00:38:09.085 --> 00:38:13.285
We have this generalization that you also just described, right?

00:38:13.325 --> 00:38:15.545
I can learn from one arm and execute with the other arm.

00:38:15.625 --> 00:38:20.085
Yeah. Wouldn't that actually imply that there must be something like a body

00:38:20.085 --> 00:38:22.505
representation somewhere and you just haven't found it yet?

00:38:22.725 --> 00:38:26.465
Yeah, it very well can be.

00:38:26.665 --> 00:38:34.345
But what I showed that at least two movements that I analyzed,

00:38:34.645 --> 00:38:36.125
which is the reaching movement,

00:38:37.145 --> 00:38:43.745
and the fetching movement, we can explain the motor program that generate this movement,

00:38:46.472 --> 00:38:50.372
on the action of the peripheral nervous system.

00:38:52.712 --> 00:38:56.732
Neuromuscular system itself. So, for example, in reaching movement,

00:38:56.952 --> 00:39:03.672
we have shown that you can generate a perfectly well extension movement in amputated

00:39:03.672 --> 00:39:07.192
arm by stimulating the arm nerve cord.

00:39:08.092 --> 00:39:13.232
So it means that at least irrespective of central representation,

00:39:13.232 --> 00:39:16.412
representation it is possible to generate such movement

00:39:16.412 --> 00:39:20.192
in amputated arm it means that the program are embedded

00:39:20.192 --> 00:39:23.172
in the well not necessarily

00:39:23.172 --> 00:39:27.252
right because as we discussed earlier there might be hierarchical structuring

00:39:27.252 --> 00:39:31.812
right so if you decorticate me i might still be able to make let's say walking

00:39:31.812 --> 00:39:37.032
like rhythmic movements with my legs and that does not imply that the bit you

00:39:37.032 --> 00:39:41.012
just removed from my brain is not representing my body or controlling it or

00:39:41.012 --> 00:39:42.012
whatever just means i have

00:39:42.092 --> 00:39:45.832
lower level reflexes that give structure to the behaviors I generate.

00:39:46.752 --> 00:39:50.192
So, so isn't that then the same case here? Because we can look at,

00:39:50.232 --> 00:39:53.332
let's say, let's look at the reaching actions.

00:39:53.472 --> 00:39:58.652
So my argument would be, well, maybe the reaching is really like a very simple reflex.

00:39:58.772 --> 00:40:03.772
It's a very important reflex for this animal that is basically used as,

00:40:03.792 --> 00:40:06.972
as a movement primitive by higher level systems. Right.

00:40:07.332 --> 00:40:10.812
So what you really show, and this is true, it is, it is definitely a reflex

00:40:10.812 --> 00:40:16.632
that sits it's very close to the organization of a single arm because a single

00:40:16.632 --> 00:40:20.092
arm can almost generate a reaching movement.

00:40:20.352 --> 00:40:25.932
So how do reaching movements exactly come about? How does this work in the octopus arm?

00:40:26.372 --> 00:40:31.932
So without the central brain, right? Yes. So what we think happens is that by

00:40:31.932 --> 00:40:34.152
stimulating locally at the base of the arm,

00:40:34.312 --> 00:40:42.552
we generate motor programs that propagate along the arm and activate both the

00:40:42.552 --> 00:40:46.832
transversal and longitudinal muscle and create a stiffening wave,

00:40:47.072 --> 00:40:51.052
which pushes actually passively at the bend forward.

00:40:51.952 --> 00:40:57.112
And this has similar kinematics to what we see in a freely behaving animal.

00:40:57.532 --> 00:41:03.572
So what we think is that maybe this movement or the command for this movement

00:41:03.572 --> 00:41:06.032
are stored in the central brain.

00:41:06.832 --> 00:41:10.452
So the way to activate this movement is stored in the higher motor center.

00:41:11.917 --> 00:41:17.577
And it's based, and therefore we say that maybe in the central nervous system

00:41:17.577 --> 00:41:26.837
what is decoded is the motor program rather than information based on the different part of the muscle.

00:41:26.857 --> 00:41:29.137
So what you're saying is, look, I have the longitudinal muscle,

00:41:29.397 --> 00:41:35.137
I have the transversal muscle, and then we have, again, a muscle sheet around that at the outside.

00:41:35.137 --> 00:41:44.217
If I drive those from inside, so from proximal to distal in sort of,

00:41:44.217 --> 00:41:47.717
it doesn't need to be a wave actually, it's a single wave front that moves to the edge.

00:41:48.537 --> 00:41:54.697
And by activating all these muscles, I create stiffness of this hydrostat, this arm.

00:41:54.997 --> 00:42:01.257
And I just have that instruction and just has to move distally through my arm.

00:42:01.497 --> 00:42:09.137
This is roughly the idea. What the brain has to do is to scale this movement,

00:42:09.217 --> 00:42:13.357
because we know that octopus can extend its arm in different speed.

00:42:13.997 --> 00:42:18.597
And this probably is done via a central command.

00:42:19.497 --> 00:42:25.517
But the propagating signal then passes through a number of neural stages.

00:42:25.517 --> 00:42:32.717
So how many neurons, so how many synapses do I cross to go from proximal to

00:42:32.717 --> 00:42:34.277
distal? Many, many, many.

00:42:34.537 --> 00:42:42.937
There are 400,000 motor neurons in each arm.

00:42:43.797 --> 00:42:47.597
And they are organized very closely one to each other.

00:42:47.597 --> 00:42:55.377
And the nerve roots that go from the nervous system to the arm leave the root,

00:42:55.497 --> 00:42:59.817
leave the central nervous system of the arm every 100 micrometer.

00:43:00.277 --> 00:43:11.637
So there is a very, very refined innervation of the muscle structure by the neural system.

00:43:12.537 --> 00:43:20.477
But what's also interesting is when we study the properties of the neuromuscular connection,

00:43:20.897 --> 00:43:27.997
we find that this connection is unlikely in all other invertebrates.

00:43:28.097 --> 00:43:30.417
It doesn't have any short-term plasticity.

00:43:30.797 --> 00:43:36.297
So it seems more that the neural activity actually determines I mean,

00:43:36.317 --> 00:43:40.537
in a more or less linear way, what will be the motor action?

00:43:40.897 --> 00:43:46.077
And this fit, what we find is that octopus probably use a feed-forward program

00:43:46.077 --> 00:43:49.937
to activate this kind of, for example, the reaching movement.

00:43:50.397 --> 00:43:55.297
Okay, but then in the case of reaching, do these motor neurons have any kind

00:43:55.297 --> 00:43:56.277
of spontaneous activity?

00:43:56.717 --> 00:44:02.037
Or they must be driven by, let's say, a command neuron that sits at the base of the arm?

00:44:03.860 --> 00:44:11.360
I think when, probably these motor neurons also are active during local movement of the arm.

00:44:11.460 --> 00:44:18.680
There is searching, there is bending, there is a lot of movement that goes on in the amputated arm.

00:44:19.140 --> 00:44:25.440
So this kind of movements also are controlled by the motor neuron of the arm.

00:44:25.700 --> 00:44:30.640
But then I assume assumes that this is coordinated by a local circuit,

00:44:30.900 --> 00:44:35.400
which is embedded in the local ganglia.

00:44:35.700 --> 00:44:43.740
Each ganglia is located next to one of the 300 circles that are running along the arm.

00:44:44.100 --> 00:44:51.520
When a central command is coming through the axonal track, which runs above the ganglia structure,

00:44:51.940 --> 00:45:01.040
it's probably activate all of the motor neurons which are needed to produce

00:45:01.040 --> 00:45:04.040
this brain directed movement.

00:45:04.480 --> 00:45:08.660
So the central brain accents cruise all the way through the arm to the end? Yeah.

00:45:08.840 --> 00:45:19.100
Okay. So there is a good radiation, but I think there is a lot of… for example, one of the possibility,

00:45:19.520 --> 00:45:26.820
and I think one student asked this question during my talk, is how the octopus

00:45:26.820 --> 00:45:30.600
generates this band at different locations along the arm.

00:45:30.740 --> 00:45:35.560
So we had the idea that what might exist in this system is a labeled line,

00:45:35.720 --> 00:45:39.680
where neurons from the brain are going to a specific site.

00:45:40.500 --> 00:45:46.940
Along the arm, and the octopus determines where, not only to activate the movement, but also where.

00:45:46.940 --> 00:45:52.980
But we didn't find yet any indication for such label line theory.

00:45:53.140 --> 00:45:55.900
But that's for the fetching behavior, right?

00:45:55.940 --> 00:46:02.060
So now, if we just look at the reaching… No, this is for the reaching, actually. Okay.

00:46:02.920 --> 00:46:07.440
What I'm speaking about. Okay. In the fetching movement, we are less…,

00:46:10.300 --> 00:46:15.180
Let's say our ideas are not that concrete because we don't know exactly what's

00:46:15.180 --> 00:46:18.960
going on. So let's wait for, let's first figure out the reaching.

00:46:20.080 --> 00:46:26.300
But now a typical thing, at least as a non-expert, you see in these octopus

00:46:26.300 --> 00:46:31.620
movies, also the ones you showed, is sort of this wavy wiggling of the arms.

00:46:31.760 --> 00:46:37.060
So that would suggest that there is also some sort of pattern generator behind that.

00:46:37.220 --> 00:46:41.860
So do these motor neurons in the arm have pattern generator-like properties? Yes.

00:46:45.910 --> 00:46:54.950
I think pattern generator is a valid term to use in this case,

00:46:55.250 --> 00:47:03.190
but I'm not sure, for example, I don't think that it's based on rhythmical pattern generating.

00:47:03.690 --> 00:47:07.970
So you can generate patterns that will induce, for example, arm reaching.

00:47:08.790 --> 00:47:13.670
So this is pattern, generating patterns which is producing the behavior.

00:47:13.670 --> 00:47:19.910
But it's not in the general sense when we speak on central pattern generator,

00:47:20.410 --> 00:47:29.230
where we create a rhythmical movement mainly to control locomotion and coordination between arms.

00:47:30.270 --> 00:47:36.410
This, I think it's less likely, but… So it's more like a variable,

00:47:36.590 --> 00:47:38.070
a more variable pattern generator.

00:47:38.070 --> 00:47:42.850
But are you saying it's maybe not so dependent on single cells and more dependent

00:47:42.850 --> 00:47:45.530
on networks of cells? Is that really the implication?

00:47:45.910 --> 00:47:50.490
Yeah, I think it's very dependent on network connection in the arm.

00:47:51.230 --> 00:47:56.110
But now, what you talked to earlier, which is important here,

00:47:56.230 --> 00:48:00.890
is that, okay, when we talk about reaching, we sort of have a wave of stiffening

00:48:00.890 --> 00:48:01.930
running through this arm.

00:48:01.930 --> 00:48:06.790
Arm, if we now go to a next level of behavior, which is more complex,

00:48:06.870 --> 00:48:13.610
which is fetching, what you showed is if an object touches the arm at some point,

00:48:13.770 --> 00:48:18.850
this leads to, and it wants to now fetch this object to bring it to the mouth,

00:48:18.930 --> 00:48:21.110
or however you call that in the Octopus.

00:48:22.610 --> 00:48:27.990
Now, you see a very specific reconfiguration of the arm. Right.

00:48:28.190 --> 00:48:31.470
That it creates even virtual joints in the arm.

00:48:31.930 --> 00:48:40.190
So, how does that work? So, we correlate this behavior with a recording, EMG recording.

00:48:40.450 --> 00:48:44.050
It's a very complex behavior, but we managed to do it.

00:48:44.350 --> 00:48:52.430
And what we discovered that probably the touching of the food in one of the

00:48:52.430 --> 00:48:58.050
sacchar activate a two-wave of propagation of muscle contraction,

00:48:58.050 --> 00:49:06.550
One which is coming from the base of the arm and one which goes from the more

00:49:06.550 --> 00:49:13.890
or less place where the arm touches the food and they are propagating in the

00:49:13.890 --> 00:49:17.110
same more or less the same speed one toward the other.

00:49:18.364 --> 00:49:23.844
And in such a form that where the point where they are colliding,

00:49:24.024 --> 00:49:31.004
this will set the site where the virtual elbow, if you like, would be created.

00:49:31.004 --> 00:49:39.464
And then in a kind of motor programs that we don't understand yet,

00:49:39.664 --> 00:49:46.524
there is a rotation of these elbows that brings the food to the mouse exactly

00:49:46.524 --> 00:49:51.764
as we do when we take something with our hand and bring it to the mouse.

00:49:51.764 --> 00:49:54.784
But this configuration, reconfiguration looks very complex, right?

00:49:54.804 --> 00:49:58.584
Because it means I have to stiffen the part that becomes a segment.

00:49:58.904 --> 00:50:05.384
Yeah. I have to then release a small part that becomes my virtual elbow.

00:50:05.664 --> 00:50:08.944
Yeah. However, I also have to give that a directionality. Yeah.

00:50:09.044 --> 00:50:13.724
It cannot be, let's say, flexible in all directions. Yeah. It's a constrained flexibility.

00:50:14.144 --> 00:50:19.104
Yeah. So how is that done? No, the arm has some structure that goes from the

00:50:19.104 --> 00:50:20.424
dorsal to the ventral part.

00:50:20.424 --> 00:50:26.504
So, you can imagine that all movements are done in the same planarity,

00:50:26.664 --> 00:50:30.344
where the soccer is pointing downward.

00:50:32.504 --> 00:50:36.604
So maybe, you know, that such a bend in the arm,

00:50:36.784 --> 00:50:41.884
which serves as the elbow, and we don't know yet, and this is one of the experiments

00:50:41.884 --> 00:50:46.404
that we would like to do, if simply two-way, because of the structure,

00:50:46.504 --> 00:50:47.644
of the muscular structure,

00:50:47.844 --> 00:50:52.884
it will be enough that two waves of activation will collide with each other

00:50:52.884 --> 00:50:55.544
due to the structure of the muscular system,

00:50:56.452 --> 00:51:00.372
a band, a rotation will be created at this point.

00:51:00.792 --> 00:51:10.932
Otherwise, it may need a more specific activation of dorsal versus ventral part of the musculature.

00:51:11.212 --> 00:51:14.712
But why would the collision of these two waves give me a joint?

00:51:14.952 --> 00:51:18.292
I mean, then you would expect that dependent on the width of your wave.

00:51:19.172 --> 00:51:25.172
Your joint would be a variable size. size, and also that you won't have such

00:51:25.172 --> 00:51:26.772
a very discrete transition.

00:51:27.112 --> 00:51:30.992
Yeah. Well, if you look at the behavior, it seems very well circumscribed where

00:51:30.992 --> 00:51:33.932
you insert that joint, no? Yeah, I think you're right.

00:51:34.292 --> 00:51:40.272
And therefore, I think the only way is to test it by an experiment to see if

00:51:40.272 --> 00:51:45.652
first, maybe it's created by two waves of muscle activation.

00:51:45.752 --> 00:51:51.192
So what we have to do is to stimulate the arm from two sides and see if we can

00:51:51.192 --> 00:52:00.072
control controlled the point where the bend will be initiated, or it won't happen.

00:52:00.492 --> 00:52:08.612
And then we may look for a mechanism whereby more specific activation of the muscle,

00:52:08.752 --> 00:52:14.912
meaning that the dorsal muscle will stiffen while the ventral part will shorten

00:52:14.912 --> 00:52:17.952
in order to create this bend.

00:52:17.952 --> 00:52:24.732
But what you also showed is that dependent on the distance from the item,

00:52:24.852 --> 00:52:29.332
from the stimulus that touches the arm to the base of the arm,

00:52:29.372 --> 00:52:30.232
dependent on the distance,

00:52:30.412 --> 00:52:34.672
the length of the segments will vary. This is one thing you showed.

00:52:35.172 --> 00:52:41.232
But then is the number of virtual joints I generate always the same? Like I think it's two.

00:52:41.652 --> 00:52:46.812
In your examples, it was always two. Two, yes, with one distal one,

00:52:47.012 --> 00:52:51.812
which serves as a hand, but the two are exactly the same.

00:52:52.012 --> 00:53:00.372
And this virtual segment are created in accordance with the site.

00:53:01.773 --> 00:53:08.593
Where the foot is was taken so this is a dynamical uh uh way of constructing an an elbow,

00:53:09.213 --> 00:53:16.613
in accordance with with what uh with what uh with where the food is uh has been

00:53:16.613 --> 00:53:22.993
uh uh catched and and this is of course a dynamical structure completely different,

00:53:23.873 --> 00:53:28.073
from that's already important no because it means it will never generate three

00:53:28.073 --> 00:53:36.393
joints or one joint No, it's dictated by a very specific motor program, this structure.

00:53:36.693 --> 00:53:42.433
But does it also already tell you some critical properties of the wave-like

00:53:42.433 --> 00:53:44.313
response that you depend on?

00:53:45.133 --> 00:53:49.813
Because that means this wave has a certain length, a certain boundary on its length.

00:53:49.813 --> 00:53:55.553
It cannot extend beyond, let's say, what the segment length dictates,

00:53:55.573 --> 00:54:01.373
and it can never get shorter than that the interference pattern gives rise to more than two joints.

00:54:03.373 --> 00:54:06.853
So doesn't this wave-like response that you built your argument on,

00:54:07.053 --> 00:54:12.873
doesn't the number of segments we get and the intersegment distance tell you

00:54:12.873 --> 00:54:18.993
something about the phase of that or the period of that wave?

00:54:22.393 --> 00:54:25.453
Because you talk about two colliding waves that give you joints.

00:54:25.593 --> 00:54:29.193
Yes. So if you already know that these joints must be at some minimum distance,

00:54:29.553 --> 00:54:32.493
it tells you something about the period and the phase of these two waves.

00:54:32.633 --> 00:54:38.553
Yeah, but the time and the period, it depends on what determines them is the

00:54:38.553 --> 00:54:40.053
site where the food was grabbed.

00:54:40.933 --> 00:54:48.553
So the time and the distance is actually the variable which determines the size

00:54:48.553 --> 00:54:50.293
of the the articulated structure.

00:54:50.833 --> 00:54:55.113
And this depended on where the octopus got the target.

00:54:55.293 --> 00:55:02.013
Right. So now we see that actually locally, such an arm already has a lot of capabilities, right?

00:55:02.073 --> 00:55:07.693
In terms of its articulation, controlling these unspecified numbers of degrees of freedom.

00:55:07.733 --> 00:55:13.353
And actually when it has to act, it freezes the degrees of freedom and reduces them into few. Right.

00:55:14.793 --> 00:55:18.533
Maybe, I guess, four, right? Because of the base of the arm.

00:55:18.613 --> 00:55:22.773
I think it's three. Well, I was thinking maybe the wiggly tip might count. I don't know.

00:55:23.413 --> 00:55:25.793
Okay. Yeah, but three, let's say.

00:55:26.673 --> 00:55:31.533
So, this is interesting. Basically, what Octopus is doing with its hydrostat

00:55:31.533 --> 00:55:35.593
is given the contact, it just freezes its degrees of freedom. Right. Right?

00:55:36.433 --> 00:55:39.713
But the point is that with that, it can build multiple configurations,

00:55:39.893 --> 00:55:43.133
which then can solve the task. This is the beauty, because this is also what

00:55:43.133 --> 00:55:50.033
people want to simulate in a flexible robot. Sure. This...

00:55:51.232 --> 00:55:54.472
New special space of controlling the

00:55:54.472 --> 00:55:57.472
structure controlling the the the shape

00:55:57.472 --> 00:56:01.052
shape of the of the robot right reshaping it's

00:56:01.052 --> 00:56:06.972
a very robust mechanism to you to build a flexible robot right yeah i want i

00:56:06.972 --> 00:56:10.312
want to get to that but first i want to understand something else better now

00:56:10.312 --> 00:56:14.992
we have an idea about what arms can do we have an idea about how reflex systems

00:56:14.992 --> 00:56:18.872
can drive this arm for especially reaching.

00:56:19.152 --> 00:56:22.172
And now we talk about those fetching as a reflex-driven response.

00:56:23.032 --> 00:56:27.272
But we also have here this octopus with these huge eyes that are really highly

00:56:27.272 --> 00:56:29.812
developed. The eyes are linked to the central brain.

00:56:30.192 --> 00:56:34.572
And with the eyes, it will detect prey. And then given the prey detection,

00:56:34.832 --> 00:56:40.212
the central brain will decide to reach for that prey and catch it, right?

00:56:40.272 --> 00:56:46.252
So now, how do you see then the central brain interface Interface to the arms

00:56:46.252 --> 00:56:47.752
and the arm control systems.

00:56:48.112 --> 00:56:53.332
You mean in goal direction? In reaching movement. To make it goal directed. Exactly right.

00:56:54.612 --> 00:56:59.972
We didn't study it, but I think what important part of it would be the base of the arm.

00:57:00.352 --> 00:57:06.452
We don't know even the muscular organization, if it has some specific structure or not.

00:57:06.872 --> 00:57:12.252
We know that along the arm, the muscular organization is exactly the same.

00:57:12.252 --> 00:57:16.372
It's very similar, despite this tapering toward the end.

00:57:16.872 --> 00:57:24.012
So, we assume that there is some system which is directing the base of the arm

00:57:24.012 --> 00:57:26.552
in the direction of the target.

00:57:26.692 --> 00:57:30.332
So, when the arm is stretched, it reaches the target.

00:57:30.852 --> 00:57:37.692
It might be also that the octopus are using feedback control to correct this movement.

00:57:37.692 --> 00:57:44.492
But in some experiments that we did where we trained the octopus to reach to

00:57:44.492 --> 00:57:49.332
a target, and after the arms start to move, we move the target.

00:57:50.890 --> 00:57:53.990
We see that the movement continues as a ballistic behavior.

00:57:54.830 --> 00:57:59.930
This means that it's really a feed-forward kind of movement that the octopus

00:57:59.930 --> 00:58:04.070
cannot readjust it after it has been initiated.

00:58:04.510 --> 00:58:08.950
But maybe also because it moves in a medium, it would be really difficult to

00:58:08.950 --> 00:58:10.130
control it differently, right?

00:58:10.350 --> 00:58:14.150
Yeah. No, but what is nice, because the octopus is so fast learning,

00:58:15.090 --> 00:58:19.210
that it's very difficult to do this experiment because it very fastly understands

00:58:19.210 --> 00:58:23.150
that the movement is going to be moved.

00:58:23.510 --> 00:58:28.910
So it takes it into account when you start the movement and can extend its arm

00:58:28.910 --> 00:58:34.870
to where it knows or assumes that the target will be ended.

00:58:35.250 --> 00:58:38.650
So how accurate is it then in these goal-oriented reaching movements?

00:58:38.970 --> 00:58:44.890
It's not very accurate in the reaching. But you have to remember that the arm is very flexible.

00:58:44.890 --> 00:58:53.670
So even if it reaches the target close enough, we can do then a wiggle or something

00:58:53.670 --> 00:58:58.190
and to get the target by moving it a little bit.

00:58:58.190 --> 00:59:02.970
Okay, so the central brain just has to do a pretty rough target setting.

00:59:03.130 --> 00:59:04.770
Yeah. It doesn't need to be very precise.

00:59:05.110 --> 00:59:07.790
Yes. So that would be with an accuracy of centimeters?

00:59:08.790 --> 00:59:11.670
Yes, I think a few centimeters. Okay.

00:59:11.910 --> 00:59:18.930
So you mentioned also when we looked at octopus motor control,

00:59:19.750 --> 00:59:22.950
that it is also an example of what people call morphological computation,

00:59:23.290 --> 00:59:28.990
for how properties of the body itself contribute to solving the control problem.

00:59:29.290 --> 00:59:31.650
So how do you see that link exactly?

00:59:32.050 --> 00:59:36.610
I think the examples that we see for this kind of computational control is really

00:59:36.610 --> 00:59:41.710
what we just spoke about, and this is the fetching movement. Thank you for watching!

00:59:42.437 --> 00:59:49.137
So I think that the idea is that the site of the elbow is controlled by propagating

00:59:49.137 --> 00:59:51.217
wave on the structure itself.

00:59:51.717 --> 00:59:56.977
And this is what the colliding point is determined the site of the elbow.

00:59:57.537 --> 01:00:03.837
It's a sort of computational, which depends on the morphology of the structure.

01:00:04.437 --> 01:00:08.297
But wait, is that fair to say? Because you could also argue it's essentially

01:00:08.297 --> 01:00:10.757
a neural process that gives you your wave.

01:00:10.757 --> 01:00:13.677
And it's it's it's interaction between the

01:00:13.677 --> 01:00:16.697
neural dynamics right let's say target induced

01:00:16.697 --> 01:00:22.297
waves and base induced waves that sets up the muscular response right and that

01:00:22.297 --> 01:00:27.017
then gives you the this is completely completely true but taking the advantage

01:00:27.017 --> 01:00:33.037
that the nervous system is in parallel with the physical structure you can use

01:00:33.037 --> 01:00:36.537
the propagation of the activity in the nervous system,

01:00:36.957 --> 01:00:45.137
which is parallel to the physical structure of the arm, as a way to compute

01:00:45.137 --> 01:00:47.277
where to build the structure.

01:00:47.517 --> 01:00:52.017
So the structure of the arm is an important component.

01:00:52.237 --> 01:00:56.057
The morphology of the arm itself, right. But it would place you a little bit

01:00:56.057 --> 01:01:00.877
in a different camp than the more extreme view that some people have expressed,

01:01:01.137 --> 01:01:06.157
that in some sense it can be pure morphology, or only the body that gives you

01:01:06.157 --> 01:01:12.637
an adaptive behavior in your proposed it would still depend on nervous system intervention.

01:01:12.977 --> 01:01:16.977
Yeah. Right? So in that sense it's not like an extreme... Yeah, but...

01:01:17.817 --> 01:01:23.097
So for example, if you want maybe the sucker of the arm is built...

01:01:23.817 --> 01:01:33.357
It can work without a sensory signal. It can, you know, attach to a surface by a simple physical...

01:01:36.696 --> 01:01:41.076
Vacuum mechanism which doesn't need any.

01:01:43.496 --> 01:01:52.376
Control. And actually what seems that the octopus have a special mechanism to

01:01:52.376 --> 01:01:55.436
release the sucker instead of attaching.

01:01:55.676 --> 01:02:02.716
Maybe attaching is occurring spontaneously but releasing the structure is more...

01:02:03.316 --> 01:02:08.696
Okay, yeah, that's a good example, really, where morphology is directly implementing a function.

01:02:08.776 --> 01:02:11.816
I would agree with you. But you were also mentioning, for instance,

01:02:11.836 --> 01:02:15.056
Rod Brooks saying that the best robot has no control. Yeah.

01:02:15.616 --> 01:02:21.456
I'm not sure the octopus would then be such a great robot if this is our definition.

01:02:23.076 --> 01:02:34.056
There's still control. Yeah. Yeah, but I think that the flexible arm and that

01:02:34.056 --> 01:02:38.336
is equipped, it's very important.

01:02:38.496 --> 01:02:42.856
The sacchar is a very important part of this structure.

01:02:43.216 --> 01:02:49.216
If there were no sacchar distributed along the arm, the behavior would have

01:02:49.216 --> 01:02:54.256
been completely different. So, because you can imagine that now the sacral fingers

01:02:54.256 --> 01:02:56.976
distributed all along the arm.

01:02:57.116 --> 01:03:07.156
And this allow using such flexible motor program to generate the behavior.

01:03:09.462 --> 01:03:14.302
I think in the Woodley-Brooke idea, building this kind of arm,

01:03:14.462 --> 01:03:19.442
which is flexible, but including many types of passive soccer,

01:03:19.742 --> 01:03:24.422
is a good idea to start in building a flexible robot.

01:03:24.582 --> 01:03:31.862
Right. And put the control on these physical capabilities of the arm.

01:03:32.862 --> 01:03:36.682
Right. But it's interesting that often people don't put their money where their mouth is, right?

01:03:36.722 --> 01:03:41.322
Because with Rod Brooks, for instance, he is actually running a company selling

01:03:41.322 --> 01:03:45.882
robots now, Baxter, a configurable industrial robot for fine manipulation.

01:03:46.342 --> 01:03:51.482
And it definitely has control structures in it. And it actually uses very little

01:03:51.482 --> 01:03:54.242
of morphological computation to be a successful product.

01:03:54.422 --> 01:04:00.082
So it would be nice when people live up to their own sermons in that respect,

01:04:00.422 --> 01:04:07.222
right? So, Benny... But I think it's a good constraint in simplifying the control.

01:04:07.562 --> 01:04:15.782
I don't think it can replace control, but it may make control much simpler.

01:04:16.082 --> 01:04:20.302
Absolutely. I agree with you. This is a good point, yes, absolutely.

01:04:21.802 --> 01:04:25.322
So, Benny, you've been studying the octopus now for how long?

01:04:25.362 --> 01:04:26.482
How many years? 20 years.

01:04:27.362 --> 01:04:32.642
Okay, so So, and you learned a lot about behavior, the nervous system of the

01:04:32.642 --> 01:04:34.782
octopus, so many things we have to discover.

01:04:35.402 --> 01:04:40.362
So, if we want to now take your experience on board in how we started the brain,

01:04:40.462 --> 01:04:41.462
what would be Benny's law?

01:04:44.582 --> 01:04:46.002
I think that….

01:04:49.738 --> 01:04:56.858
And it's very dangerous to try to understand the brain without the body.

01:04:58.538 --> 01:05:03.338
And when people want to understand how behavior is generated and controlled,

01:05:05.178 --> 01:05:12.958
they can study the brain in isolation just in order to find the properties of

01:05:12.958 --> 01:05:18.218
the component of the central brain.

01:05:18.218 --> 01:05:23.058
But to understand how these properties are organized,

01:05:23.558 --> 01:05:28.418
maybe self-organized, in order to control the behavior,

01:05:28.918 --> 01:05:38.538
you must, part of your study, do when the animal is activating the body and

01:05:38.538 --> 01:05:40.318
better even in behavior.

01:05:40.318 --> 01:05:45.118
And I think the idea of in vivo recording and doing experiments that involve

01:05:45.118 --> 01:05:52.598
monitoring the action of the brain while doing actual behavior is more and more

01:05:52.598 --> 01:05:59.138
common now in our days. Right. Yeah.

01:05:59.838 --> 01:06:04.338
So in some sense, from this embodiment perspective, you also have been looking

01:06:04.338 --> 01:06:06.518
at this emerging field of soft robotics.

01:06:06.518 --> 01:06:13.218
And do you think soft robotics has really taken on board enough of the insights

01:06:13.218 --> 01:06:15.238
and lessons from the study of Octopus yes.

01:06:18.951 --> 01:06:23.611
I think the main problem in soft robotics is the material.

01:06:25.311 --> 01:06:28.231
There is no material like musculoskeletal system.

01:06:28.791 --> 01:06:35.371
So effective, so robust, so high strain.

01:06:35.731 --> 01:06:41.751
And this is what limits the soft robotics at this stage, I think.

01:06:42.171 --> 01:06:45.491
But I think there is a lot of progression in this area.

01:06:45.491 --> 01:06:54.611
At this point, what people do is that they combine different ideas taken from

01:06:54.611 --> 01:06:57.671
the octopus, for example.

01:06:57.971 --> 01:07:05.611
So it's not only constant volume constraint, but it can be the controlling of

01:07:05.611 --> 01:07:12.651
stiffness, it can be particle jamming, other ideas about that.

01:07:12.751 --> 01:07:20.991
If you think about it, it may come from biology and be implemented in the system.

01:07:21.631 --> 01:07:25.591
I think also from the control point of view,

01:07:25.731 --> 01:07:30.651
the idea of distributing the control between the central and peripheral and

01:07:30.651 --> 01:07:34.791
to leave much of the control and even more complex part of it,

01:07:34.871 --> 01:07:40.711
like even learning a memory, learning at the level of the arm,

01:07:40.871 --> 01:07:47.371
are ideas that comes from such studies that we are doing in the octopus.

01:07:47.791 --> 01:07:51.351
Right. So then, last question. Five years from now, we're going to come visit

01:07:51.351 --> 01:07:57.291
you in Jerusalem, and we're going to check whether a prediction you make today

01:07:57.291 --> 01:07:59.011
has actually been verified or not.

01:07:59.011 --> 01:08:04.291
So, what's the most important prediction or hypothesis you would like to see

01:08:04.291 --> 01:08:06.951
verified in that timeframe of five years?

01:08:09.477 --> 01:08:15.017
So, as I mentioned, we have two projects.

01:08:15.277 --> 01:08:19.457
Now we are more into the learning memory mechanism.

01:08:20.077 --> 01:08:25.957
And we are studying what is the mechanism of learning memory in the octopus.

01:08:25.957 --> 01:08:35.377
Octopus, and we may discover a new solution to the problem of how the nervous

01:08:35.377 --> 01:08:38.997
system stores information.

01:08:40.637 --> 01:08:44.757
And I believe that there are many ways, and the octopus is a very good example,

01:08:45.117 --> 01:08:48.817
there are many independent ways to build a complex brain. train.

01:08:49.957 --> 01:08:57.397
But at the end, they will point to what is the universal importance in networks

01:08:57.397 --> 01:09:00.037
that can mediate learning and memory.

01:09:01.017 --> 01:09:07.517
And I hope that we will learn enough on the mechanism of motor control of the

01:09:07.517 --> 01:09:15.157
octopus that it will be really more feasible to implement in the soft robotic.

01:09:16.357 --> 01:09:24.617
Hopefully, while we are doing our biological research, the search into attenuator

01:09:24.617 --> 01:09:29.097
material will progress as well. Right.

01:09:29.277 --> 01:09:31.737
Okay. Benny Hochman, thank you very much for this conversation.

01:09:32.137 --> 01:09:34.357
Thank you. Hochner. Hochner, sorry.

01:09:37.277 --> 01:09:42.917
The CSN podcast was produced by the Convergent Science Network of Biometrics

01:09:42.917 --> 01:09:49.297
and Biohybrid Systems, a project funded by the European 7th Research Framework Program.

01:09:50.857 --> 01:09:56.177
For more interviews, recorded lectures, or upcoming conferences in the field

01:09:56.177 --> 01:10:02.417
of biometrics and biohybrid systems, go to csnnetwork.eu.

01:10:03.120 --> 01:10:10.960
Music.