1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:03,420
unusual icebreakers continue.

2
00:00:03,420 --> 00:00:08,220
And Ariel has been very generous and

3
00:00:08,220 --> 00:00:12,620
been listening to my crazy icebreaker ideas.

4
00:00:12,620 --> 00:00:19,140
So it popped into my head the other day of it doesn't have to be a full crowd.

5
00:00:19,140 --> 00:00:24,300
But if you had to do karaoke, what is your go-to karaoke song?

6
00:00:24,300 --> 00:00:26,300
And I can go first.

7
00:00:26,300 --> 00:00:36,700
I'm a fan of rock and so I would probably do No One Knows by Queens of the Stone Age.

8
00:00:36,700 --> 00:00:41,080
It's a pretty simple lyrics, nothing too crazy,

9
00:00:41,080 --> 00:00:45,020
pretty memorable lyrics that I could probably pull out.

10
00:00:45,020 --> 00:00:47,860
I've listened to it quite a few times.

11
00:00:47,860 --> 00:00:51,860
It's on my running playlist, which helps with that.

12
00:00:51,860 --> 00:00:54,860
I've heard it quite a few times.

13
00:00:54,860 --> 00:00:57,860
But I feel like it's a good,

14
00:00:57,860 --> 00:01:04,860
not a huge range where I have to hit like Mariah Carey levels on the top.

15
00:01:04,860 --> 00:01:08,500
So or the Berryman low bottom.

16
00:01:08,500 --> 00:01:12,180
So right in the middle, kind of my range.

17
00:01:12,180 --> 00:01:14,100
Yeah.

18
00:01:14,100 --> 00:01:16,100
Nice.

19
00:01:16,100 --> 00:01:19,940
Teenage Dirtbag by Weedus.

20
00:01:19,940 --> 00:01:27,940
Anything by the band Placebo that they've got, which tends to not be much.

21
00:01:27,940 --> 00:01:35,380
Or it's tough.

22
00:01:35,380 --> 00:01:36,380
There's so many choices.

23
00:01:36,380 --> 00:01:39,220
If they've got Rock in the Suburbs by Ben Folds,

24
00:01:39,220 --> 00:01:42,700
I think I got to throw that out there because it's got to be light.

25
00:01:42,700 --> 00:01:44,620
You can't go too heavy with this song,

26
00:01:44,620 --> 00:01:47,500
especially if you're doing karaoke in front of like with,

27
00:01:47,500 --> 00:01:53,500
maybe you're in a bar rather than just with a group in a private room.

28
00:01:53,500 --> 00:01:54,500
Yeah.

29
00:01:54,500 --> 00:02:00,500
I mean, Teenage Dirtbag is a real, real easy one to throw out there.

30
00:02:00,500 --> 00:02:03,500
Or a bunch of songs by Blink 182 as well,

31
00:02:03,500 --> 00:02:08,500
because I'll just revert to feeling like a teenager again.

32
00:02:08,500 --> 00:02:11,500
I was gonna say, I like that Matthew.

33
00:02:11,500 --> 00:02:13,500
He said, what's your karaoke song?

34
00:02:13,500 --> 00:02:15,500
And he's like, well, here's my whole set.

35
00:02:15,500 --> 00:02:17,500
I'm doing a whole show.

36
00:02:17,500 --> 00:02:20,500
Wait, does everyone, let me hide the sheet.

37
00:02:20,500 --> 00:02:23,500
Does everyone not have a set list?

38
00:02:23,500 --> 00:02:25,500
I love it.

39
00:02:25,500 --> 00:02:26,500
Oh my gosh.

40
00:02:26,500 --> 00:02:30,500
I think I've answered this before in a different like meeting.

41
00:02:30,500 --> 00:02:35,500
And my go to is just anything that does not have a lot of singing

42
00:02:35,500 --> 00:02:40,500
and just a lot of music so I can just dance awkwardly on stage.

43
00:02:40,500 --> 00:02:41,500
Okay.

44
00:02:41,500 --> 00:02:42,500
And there's just no singing.

45
00:02:42,500 --> 00:02:43,500
Just up there.

46
00:02:43,500 --> 00:02:45,500
Would you do like a lip sync battle?

47
00:02:45,500 --> 00:02:48,500
Would your song change if you were doing lip syncing instead?

48
00:02:48,500 --> 00:02:50,500
Yes, that would be fine.

49
00:02:50,500 --> 00:02:55,500
Boy, I would love if I did a lip sync battle.

50
00:02:55,500 --> 00:02:57,500
That's a totally different thing.

51
00:02:57,500 --> 00:03:02,500
But I probably choose some sort of like musical theater like, you know,

52
00:03:02,500 --> 00:03:07,500
singing in the rain or something, you know.

53
00:03:07,500 --> 00:03:09,500
Somewhere you can like dance around.

54
00:03:09,500 --> 00:03:10,500
Yes.

55
00:03:10,500 --> 00:03:12,500
Make a production of it.

56
00:03:12,500 --> 00:03:13,500
I'm with you Ariel.

57
00:03:13,500 --> 00:03:16,500
I'm like, I am tone deaf and I know it.

58
00:03:16,500 --> 00:03:18,500
You will never see me do karaoke.

59
00:03:18,500 --> 00:03:20,500
I definitely Google them aside.

60
00:03:20,500 --> 00:03:22,500
Funny as karaoke songs when you can't sing.

61
00:03:22,500 --> 00:03:23,500
Google it.

62
00:03:23,500 --> 00:03:24,500
So I now have a list.

63
00:03:24,500 --> 00:03:26,500
I still wouldn't sing any of these because they're like,

64
00:03:26,500 --> 00:03:27,500
want to be by the spice girls.

65
00:03:27,500 --> 00:03:30,500
And I was like, I say, maybe you have an alize.

66
00:03:30,500 --> 00:03:34,500
But I'm with you, Ariel, that I'm like, because you immediately think

67
00:03:34,500 --> 00:03:38,500
of right like Tom Holland lip sync battle doing umbrella.

68
00:03:38,500 --> 00:03:42,500
And I was like, if you could do it as like a whole choreographed

69
00:03:42,500 --> 00:03:46,500
performance, then it sparks some joy in me.

70
00:03:46,500 --> 00:03:48,500
But I still don't even want to lip sync.

71
00:03:48,500 --> 00:03:51,500
Let's just say that enough like theater tryouts as a child that I

72
00:03:51,500 --> 00:03:54,500
failed scarred me enough for life that I was like, I was a dance

73
00:03:54,500 --> 00:03:57,500
minor, but I still would never want to move my lips.

74
00:03:57,500 --> 00:04:01,500
So that's my answer to that.

75
00:04:01,500 --> 00:04:04,500
Whereas I'm realizing I didn't even think of musical theater

76
00:04:04,500 --> 00:04:05,500
numbers.

77
00:04:05,500 --> 00:04:07,500
And now I have a separate list.

78
00:04:07,500 --> 00:04:11,500
So I'm going with Matthew to be his agent and stage manager,

79
00:04:11,500 --> 00:04:13,500
but I will not be performing.

80
00:04:13,500 --> 00:04:16,500
My favorite one of my favorite lip sync battles.

81
00:04:16,500 --> 00:04:20,500
And I'll end with this is the rock doing Taylor Swift's

82
00:04:20,500 --> 00:04:24,500
shake it off on Jimmy Fallon.

83
00:04:24,500 --> 00:04:27,500
And it's amazing because he's lip syncing.

84
00:04:27,500 --> 00:04:31,500
And so it's Taylor Swift singing, but it's the rock.

85
00:04:31,500 --> 00:04:33,500
It's amazing.

86
00:04:33,500 --> 00:04:36,500
Yeah.

87
00:04:36,500 --> 00:04:38,500
I'm a stone doing all I do is win.

88
00:04:38,500 --> 00:04:42,500
I just decided if I had to do one, that was incredible.

89
00:04:42,500 --> 00:04:44,500
And that's just a fun song.

90
00:04:44,500 --> 00:04:45,500
So yeah.

91
00:04:45,500 --> 00:04:47,500
Awesome.

92
00:04:47,500 --> 00:04:53,500
Well, just like karaoke singers rely on their technology.

93
00:04:53,500 --> 00:04:54,500
I'm doing.

94
00:04:54,500 --> 00:04:55,500
Thank you.

95
00:04:55,500 --> 00:04:58,500
So many businesses for the day today.

96
00:04:58,500 --> 00:04:59,500
Yes.

97
00:04:59,500 --> 00:05:00,500
All right.

98
00:05:00,500 --> 00:05:04,500
So today on our tech for business podcast, we're joined by

99
00:05:04,500 --> 00:05:08,500
Matthew, our GRC analyst and BC so and Andrew, our customer

100
00:05:08,500 --> 00:05:10,500
strategy advisor.

101
00:05:10,500 --> 00:05:15,500
Who last time we talked workstations this time we're

102
00:05:15,500 --> 00:05:18,500
talking servers and applications.

103
00:05:18,500 --> 00:05:21,500
I'm going to kind of throw it over to Matthew because I know

104
00:05:21,500 --> 00:05:24,500
you had a lot planned for today and I'll let you just dive

105
00:05:24,500 --> 00:05:25,500
right in.

106
00:05:25,500 --> 00:05:27,500
Thank you.

107
00:05:27,500 --> 00:05:28,500
Yeah.

108
00:05:28,500 --> 00:05:30,500
So those of you who listened to the other podcast know that we

109
00:05:30,500 --> 00:05:35,500
realized pretty early on how much of this topic we could

110
00:05:35,500 --> 00:05:38,500
cover during the timeframe we'd set aside so that you guys

111
00:05:38,500 --> 00:05:41,500
don't listen to us just talk for an hour and a half flat.

112
00:05:41,500 --> 00:05:45,500
And so we really wanted to segment servers from this

113
00:05:45,500 --> 00:05:49,500
because it's such a completely different conversation.

114
00:05:49,500 --> 00:05:52,500
Even though you can generalize some of it and you've probably

115
00:05:52,500 --> 00:05:55,500
heard it be generalized, it really shouldn't be the

116
00:05:55,500 --> 00:05:59,500
conversation should be bigger from the types of servers and

117
00:05:59,500 --> 00:06:03,500
how we'll dig into all of this to the way your applications

118
00:06:03,500 --> 00:06:06,500
can impact that, the licensing can impact that.

119
00:06:06,500 --> 00:06:10,500
There's a bigger conversation and a different conversation that

120
00:06:10,500 --> 00:06:14,500
goes into how does everything that we do keep running and when

121
00:06:14,500 --> 00:06:21,500
should we replace it, then how should we replace workstations?

122
00:06:21,500 --> 00:06:26,500
And so with that being said, while AJ and I both have these

123
00:06:26,500 --> 00:06:29,500
conversations, I think AJ had one yesterday, which is a little

124
00:06:29,500 --> 00:06:31,500
more recent than my last one.

125
00:06:31,500 --> 00:06:34,500
So AJ, what's the first thing for you that kind of comes up

126
00:06:34,500 --> 00:06:36,500
when you're having these conversations about replacing

127
00:06:36,500 --> 00:06:38,500
servers?

128
00:06:38,500 --> 00:06:45,500
You know, first thing is really what is the goal of the company?

129
00:06:45,500 --> 00:06:47,500
Everybody hears the cloud.

130
00:06:47,500 --> 00:06:52,500
Everybody knows, you know, okay, the cloud is, for lack of

131
00:06:52,500 --> 00:06:56,500
better words, somebody else's computer that's always available.

132
00:06:56,500 --> 00:07:00,500
It's resources that are available to everybody instead of

133
00:07:00,500 --> 00:07:02,500
having to hold them yourself.

134
00:07:02,500 --> 00:07:04,500
Is that the goal of your company?

135
00:07:04,500 --> 00:07:06,500
If that is, great.

136
00:07:06,500 --> 00:07:09,500
Let's talk about some of the things that do that.

137
00:07:09,500 --> 00:07:15,500
Coming into the applications, Microsoft has done a very good

138
00:07:15,500 --> 00:07:20,500
job at taking a lot of the services that they have traditionally

139
00:07:20,500 --> 00:07:27,500
hosted on their servers on a server that you manage, and

140
00:07:27,500 --> 00:07:33,500
they've transitioned them over to Azure and 365.

141
00:07:33,500 --> 00:07:35,500
One of the easiest examples is mail.

142
00:07:35,500 --> 00:07:37,500
People don't have mail servers anymore.

143
00:07:37,500 --> 00:07:39,500
It's through 365.

144
00:07:39,500 --> 00:07:41,500
And so...

145
00:07:41,500 --> 00:07:43,500
A quick shout out there, or you shouldn't have mail servers

146
00:07:43,500 --> 00:07:46,500
unless you have a very specific need for them.

147
00:07:46,500 --> 00:07:52,500
Hosting your own exchange server is a real task.

148
00:07:52,500 --> 00:07:54,500
Yes, especially nowadays.

149
00:07:54,500 --> 00:07:56,500
Not to let my feelings shine through too heavily.

150
00:07:56,500 --> 00:07:59,500
I still remember how to configure them.

151
00:07:59,500 --> 00:08:02,500
And, you know, still remember that stuff.

152
00:08:02,500 --> 00:08:07,500
But, you know, it's really where are you going and trying to

153
00:08:07,500 --> 00:08:12,500
find an equivalent to what is available for you.

154
00:08:12,500 --> 00:08:15,500
And so Microsoft is an easy example because they have a lot

155
00:08:15,500 --> 00:08:19,500
of things and most, you know, if it's Google, great.

156
00:08:19,500 --> 00:08:23,500
Google has a lot of those services as well.

157
00:08:23,500 --> 00:08:28,500
When you come to specific applications, it's really working

158
00:08:28,500 --> 00:08:30,500
with that vendor.

159
00:08:30,500 --> 00:08:32,500
And it's really identifying those.

160
00:08:32,500 --> 00:08:35,500
So I would say the first step is identifying what is dependent

161
00:08:35,500 --> 00:08:38,500
upon those servers.

162
00:08:38,500 --> 00:08:40,500
You know, we talked about Microsoft.

163
00:08:40,500 --> 00:08:42,500
There's ERP systems.

164
00:08:42,500 --> 00:08:44,500
There could be a database.

165
00:08:44,500 --> 00:08:47,500
They don't communicate with you aboutれて- café.

166
00:08:47,500 --> 00:08:49,500
connected to.

167
00:08:49,500 --> 00:08:51,500
Then what does it mean?

168
00:08:51,500 --> 00:08:53,500
So, you know, Python is an easy way to do this.

169
00:08:53,500 --> 00:08:55,500
And couldn't win it on cloud because they didn't know

170
00:08:55,500 --> 00:08:56,500
that.

171
00:08:56,500 --> 00:08:58,500
But, don't整te, don't nervi blood or cosaetate others.

172
00:08:58,500 --> 00:09:00,700
Do you want to have, like a dynamite that it could take

173
00:09:00,700 --> 00:09:02,500
millions of look at it from the source?

174
00:09:02,500 --> 00:09:03,500
Because if it was going to pull our ends,

175
00:09:03,500 --> 00:09:05,500
then it would be a couple of best ways to do this service.

176
00:09:05,500 --> 00:09:07,500
If you're somebody could give you a training skill what that

177
00:09:07,500 --> 00:09:10,500
model works.

178
00:09:10,500 --> 00:09:12,220
You can complete a tutorial for that server or

179
00:09:12,220 --> 00:09:13,500
no, just create engineers.

180
00:09:13,500 --> 00:09:18,940
more. You know, I don't even want to guess because I don't.

181
00:09:19,980 --> 00:09:24,980
I'm going to age myself and whatever. But hypervisors or

182
00:09:24,980 --> 00:09:32,180
hosts are very common now where you have one or two pieces of

183
00:09:32,180 --> 00:09:38,060
hardware, actual physical hardware, and they have virtual

184
00:09:38,060 --> 00:09:43,860
machines or VMs hosted on them and you can spin up and run

185
00:09:43,860 --> 00:09:48,620
multiple servers on that host, right? So you could have your

186
00:09:48,620 --> 00:09:55,740
domain controller and a print server in your domain services

187
00:09:55,780 --> 00:09:59,420
or whatever services you're running, you can have it on

188
00:09:59,420 --> 00:10:01,740
that one. It's, you know, they're definitely different

189
00:10:01,740 --> 00:10:08,300
VMs. So that's the environment that we're looking at now of can

190
00:10:08,300 --> 00:10:14,660
we translate that to the cloud or replace that hardware? Most is

191
00:10:14,660 --> 00:10:19,420
that cycle of four, five years. The discussion came up

192
00:10:19,420 --> 00:10:23,300
because I have a customer. It was as Matthew said yesterday,

193
00:10:23,780 --> 00:10:28,940
the warranty is coming up in 2024 in March. And the company

194
00:10:28,940 --> 00:10:33,140
told him told our contact, hey, our goal is to be in the cloud

195
00:10:33,140 --> 00:10:39,260
by January of 2025. And we said, okay, that's perfect. We'll

196
00:10:39,260 --> 00:10:44,980
renew the warranty for one more year, which is easier through,

197
00:10:45,020 --> 00:10:48,780
you know, HP or Dell or whatever service, we can say,

198
00:10:48,780 --> 00:10:51,980
hey, let's renew this, this warranty, making sure that if

199
00:10:51,980 --> 00:10:54,660
something happens to that hardware, especially engine

200
00:10:54,660 --> 00:10:59,940
hardware, that we have that coverage. And then, okay, we

201
00:10:59,940 --> 00:11:05,020
have a, you know, we have an end date to replace that hardware

202
00:11:05,020 --> 00:11:09,940
and have that plan. It is great that that company goal is to

203
00:11:09,940 --> 00:11:15,700
have it, we're going to have a lot more backing on on the

204
00:11:15,700 --> 00:11:18,660
initiatives that we're proposing and from the IT

205
00:11:18,660 --> 00:11:22,820
department, because that's the company's goal. It's, you know,

206
00:11:22,820 --> 00:11:27,460
it can be more difficult when you need to get leadership

207
00:11:27,460 --> 00:11:31,300
involved in saying, hey, this is why we should do it. You know,

208
00:11:31,300 --> 00:11:33,940
and in a lot of the reasons are, you know, frankly, moving

209
00:11:33,940 --> 00:11:37,780
anything to the cloud or any resource that is always available.

210
00:11:38,820 --> 00:11:44,020
Something you don't have to manage. Mail is a great example,

211
00:11:44,380 --> 00:11:48,100
because it's pretty much almost always moved over to the cloud

212
00:11:48,100 --> 00:11:54,260
now and hosted somewhere else. It's always up. Or it has, I

213
00:11:54,260 --> 00:11:56,820
don't know what Microsoft guarantees, but, you know, four

214
00:11:56,820 --> 00:12:02,820
nines or five nines of availability. You know,

215
00:12:03,540 --> 00:12:06,820
management is a lot easier, you can do it from anywhere, you

216
00:12:06,820 --> 00:12:12,420
don't have to come into the main location to access the

217
00:12:12,420 --> 00:12:15,340
server. You don't have the server costs, you don't have

218
00:12:15,340 --> 00:12:17,900
everything that's related to that server costs to the

219
00:12:17,900 --> 00:12:20,780
security of that server. What happens if something happens

220
00:12:20,780 --> 00:12:26,620
to it to the data? So all of those translate to that

221
00:12:26,620 --> 00:12:31,660
physical hardware. So it's trying to find what solution

222
00:12:31,660 --> 00:12:35,820
works best. One of the big challenges that we're going to

223
00:12:35,820 --> 00:12:42,060
have to have with this customer is they have a database that

224
00:12:42,060 --> 00:12:48,140
we have to see if we can move it to a cloud resource. That's

225
00:12:48,140 --> 00:12:53,580
not always possible. And I've had other discussions where

226
00:12:53,580 --> 00:12:58,860
they have, they host one thing on, you know, their hardware,

227
00:12:58,860 --> 00:13:02,460
physical hardware on site, and everything else is moved up.

228
00:13:02,460 --> 00:13:06,300
We've done a pretty much full migration as much as we can to

229
00:13:06,300 --> 00:13:11,020
a cloud resource, but it's not always possible, but it's looking

230
00:13:11,020 --> 00:13:18,300
into it. And that's really where it's finding the solutions

231
00:13:18,300 --> 00:13:23,900
using a technology partner like CIT to say, hey, what am I

232
00:13:23,900 --> 00:13:30,380
running? How can this move? Talking to your vendor of, okay,

233
00:13:30,380 --> 00:13:34,060
you're using QuickBooks. Okay, what does QuickBooks have? I

234
00:13:34,060 --> 00:13:37,900
know QuickBooks has QuickBook Cloud. What does that look like?

235
00:13:37,900 --> 00:13:42,380
What is their timeline for the migration? Because it's not

236
00:13:42,380 --> 00:13:46,060
just going to be a flip of a switch, and it never is. And

237
00:13:46,060 --> 00:13:50,620
again, I applaud this company for saying January of 2025.

238
00:13:50,620 --> 00:13:55,660
That's a realistic goal for a lot of these things in being able

239
00:13:55,660 --> 00:13:59,260
to set benchmarks of saying we want to get our new QuickBooks

240
00:13:59,260 --> 00:14:05,180
in by July. So we know we can run through several months of

241
00:14:05,180 --> 00:14:11,180
going, do we have everything and doing a spot check? Again, it's

242
00:14:11,180 --> 00:14:15,580
a, you know, all the different systems you have, you have to

243
00:14:15,580 --> 00:14:17,980
think about that on the whole scale. And if you're going to

244
00:14:17,980 --> 00:14:25,100
change stuff on a full scale, that's a lot of changes. So

245
00:14:25,100 --> 00:14:31,180
having a realistic timeline too is something to keep in mind.

246
00:14:31,180 --> 00:14:36,940
You know, January of 2025, I think is a good goal. It's also,

247
00:14:36,940 --> 00:14:40,060
you know, we're having these conversations now to make sure

248
00:14:40,060 --> 00:14:43,900
that we can hit that goal. And that's still going to be, you

249
00:14:43,900 --> 00:14:46,060
know, we're going to have to make sure we keep things on

250
00:14:46,060 --> 00:14:49,820
track on our side and be able to help facilitate those

251
00:14:49,820 --> 00:14:54,620
conversations to make sure we hit that goal. Yeah, I think I

252
00:14:54,620 --> 00:14:57,660
like, I agree with everything you've said. There's so much of

253
00:14:57,660 --> 00:15:02,700
this that is important for how we think about this long term,

254
00:15:02,700 --> 00:15:05,180
right? This, we're talking about this at a technical level,

255
00:15:05,180 --> 00:15:07,100
and that's where people think about it because we're talking

256
00:15:07,100 --> 00:15:09,580
about hardware, we're talking about technical hardware, but

257
00:15:09,580 --> 00:15:12,540
it's really a business conversation. And when we're

258
00:15:12,540 --> 00:15:15,980
talking about hardware lifecycle, the reason we have to

259
00:15:15,980 --> 00:15:19,740
think about what do you want to do in five years is because

260
00:15:19,740 --> 00:15:22,540
it's not as simple as just replacing the laptop, right?

261
00:15:22,540 --> 00:15:25,580
We're talking about, like you said, every piece of hardware

262
00:15:25,580 --> 00:15:28,060
and software that is critical to your infrastructure

263
00:15:28,060 --> 00:15:31,820
effectively. If this goes down, how bad is that for you? And

264
00:15:31,820 --> 00:15:33,820
then we're talking about what can we take off your hands?

265
00:15:33,820 --> 00:15:35,900
We're talking about, like you said, going to the cloud,

266
00:15:35,900 --> 00:15:39,660
creating a hybrid environment. We're talking about how we can

267
00:15:39,660 --> 00:15:43,980
make things more resilient in office. You spoke about

268
00:15:43,980 --> 00:15:48,860
hypervisors and VMs. And without digging too deeply into

269
00:15:48,860 --> 00:15:52,860
those, one of the most common questions I still get is what

270
00:15:52,860 --> 00:15:57,580
differentiates a server. And the answer is you decide it is

271
00:15:57,580 --> 00:16:00,380
one in the short term that really is the only thing that

272
00:16:00,380 --> 00:16:04,380
makes it a server. People can argue the hardware in it.

273
00:16:04,380 --> 00:16:07,100
Yes, sure, there's special server hardware that is only

274
00:16:07,100 --> 00:16:09,500
designed to go in servers, but that's not because it can't go

275
00:16:09,500 --> 00:16:13,180
in workstations, it's just it goes in servers because we want

276
00:16:13,180 --> 00:16:18,380
the better stuff in there. And so the overarching idea here is

277
00:16:18,380 --> 00:16:24,380
not so much we need to replace the server. It's we need to

278
00:16:24,380 --> 00:16:27,180
think about exactly what our environment is doing. And we

279
00:16:27,180 --> 00:16:29,900
need to think about how we can make it better and more

280
00:16:29,900 --> 00:16:33,100
resilient and future-proof it as best as possible.

281
00:16:33,100 --> 00:16:35,900
Mail servers are still the best example. And I know Andrew went

282
00:16:35,900 --> 00:16:40,380
into that a couple of times, but the move to Exchange Online,

283
00:16:40,380 --> 00:16:44,700
which became Microsoft 365, significantly helped a lot of

284
00:16:44,700 --> 00:16:48,460
customers. It's helped many businesses, not just because

285
00:16:48,460 --> 00:16:52,860
there have been multiple security issues with local

286
00:16:52,860 --> 00:16:58,140
Exchange servers in recent years, but because those, all of

287
00:16:58,140 --> 00:17:01,420
this now became handled by Microsoft. You didn't have to

288
00:17:01,420 --> 00:17:03,660
worry about it. You didn't have to do updates or make sure

289
00:17:03,660 --> 00:17:07,820
you were checking things. Back when I started as a

290
00:17:07,820 --> 00:17:12,780
Service Center technician, Exchange Online security issues

291
00:17:12,780 --> 00:17:15,420
and technical warnings were one of the majority of things I

292
00:17:15,420 --> 00:17:18,860
looked at because if someone configured them incorrectly, all

293
00:17:18,860 --> 00:17:21,020
of a sudden you're getting pinged from all over the world

294
00:17:21,020 --> 00:17:27,260
because mail is something people can sell online. So when we're

295
00:17:27,260 --> 00:17:30,140
talking about it, we're really building down to that asset

296
00:17:30,140 --> 00:17:34,540
knowledge. And for me, as you guys have heard, if you listen

297
00:17:34,540 --> 00:17:37,500
to this as someone who works heavily in the GRC space and

298
00:17:37,500 --> 00:17:41,420
talks about regulations and compliance, there is so many

299
00:17:41,420 --> 00:17:44,860
things we need to keep in mind for that. And I often come back

300
00:17:44,860 --> 00:17:50,140
to the FFIEC who has a tiered system for how they judge

301
00:17:50,140 --> 00:17:54,940
things, but one of their higher tier ones for servers states

302
00:17:54,940 --> 00:17:59,660
that every server should only perform one function. And that

303
00:17:59,660 --> 00:18:01,900
doesn't mean that there's only one thing running on it, but

304
00:18:01,900 --> 00:18:06,700
it means it should only provide one service to the

305
00:18:06,700 --> 00:18:10,060
organization, whether that is the print server, like Andrew

306
00:18:10,060 --> 00:18:13,180
mentioned, whether that's a file share, whether that's your

307
00:18:13,180 --> 00:18:16,860
domain name services or DNS services. What you're looking

308
00:18:16,860 --> 00:18:21,340
for is a system that allows for resilience by saying if this

309
00:18:21,340 --> 00:18:27,740
thing breaks, can I still keep running in some way? The

310
00:18:27,740 --> 00:18:31,820
servers that Andrew described of everything's on one big

311
00:18:31,820 --> 00:18:34,460
server and then that service gets shut down and you lose

312
00:18:34,460 --> 00:18:38,220
everything is how it was run back when I started doing this

313
00:18:38,220 --> 00:18:41,340
and it's the way some organizations still run. The

314
00:18:41,340 --> 00:18:44,780
resiliency is zero. If something breaks and requires a

315
00:18:44,780 --> 00:18:48,700
reboot, you lose access to everything. So we're trying to

316
00:18:48,700 --> 00:18:51,980
come up with ways to break that out, come up with every

317
00:18:51,980 --> 00:18:55,660
service. And for me, it still always starts with an asset

318
00:18:55,660 --> 00:18:59,340
management list. Every single application you need, every

319
00:18:59,340 --> 00:19:01,740
single server and piece of hardware you currently have,

320
00:19:01,740 --> 00:19:05,100
break them all down, find the ones that work best, find out

321
00:19:05,100 --> 00:19:08,300
how you can make them survive, find out where they should

322
00:19:08,300 --> 00:19:11,100
go. Can they be moved to the cloud? Speak with those vendors

323
00:19:11,100 --> 00:19:14,220
if it's a specific tool. Maybe you need a hybrid

324
00:19:14,220 --> 00:19:16,060
environment where some things are in the cloud and some

325
00:19:16,060 --> 00:19:19,180
things are in your office. That's okay. That still may be

326
00:19:19,180 --> 00:19:23,420
incredibly cost effective for you. But what you're trying to

327
00:19:23,420 --> 00:19:28,060
do is really confirm and create a system that allows you to

328
00:19:28,060 --> 00:19:31,740
move forward. Sometimes moving everything to the cloud

329
00:19:31,740 --> 00:19:35,020
isn't the right goal for you. And sometimes that means you'll

330
00:19:35,020 --> 00:19:39,500
need a couple of hosts, maybe a bunch of VMs all doing

331
00:19:39,500 --> 00:19:43,420
different things. I know this is going to sound a little

332
00:19:43,420 --> 00:19:46,140
crazy to a lot of people, but I honestly think that most

333
00:19:46,140 --> 00:19:50,300
organizations need at least one host and four VMs nowadays.

334
00:19:50,300 --> 00:19:52,540
Any less than that. And I'm wondering what you're doubling

335
00:19:52,540 --> 00:19:56,460
up on. As I said, the FFIC has these requirements and some

336
00:19:56,460 --> 00:20:00,620
environments I'm looking at have six to eight hosts and we're

337
00:20:00,620 --> 00:20:04,780
talking 30 or 40 servers. And when I say servers in this case,

338
00:20:04,780 --> 00:20:09,740
I mean VMs running on those hosts. And the reason for that

339
00:20:09,740 --> 00:20:15,500
is that if you're running a piece of software that handles

340
00:20:15,500 --> 00:20:18,380
your financial data, but you're also running one that

341
00:20:18,380 --> 00:20:21,260
handles your internal communication data, you shouldn't

342
00:20:21,260 --> 00:20:26,300
have to lose both if one of them breaks. And so if one

343
00:20:26,300 --> 00:20:29,900
breaks, that services down, okay? But everything else is

344
00:20:29,900 --> 00:20:33,580
running because you've segmented them safely. And so like I

345
00:20:33,580 --> 00:20:35,820
said, these conversations feel like we're having technical

346
00:20:35,820 --> 00:20:37,740
conversations, but really we're having that business

347
00:20:37,740 --> 00:20:41,020
conversation. Which of these things is the most critical?

348
00:20:41,020 --> 00:20:43,740
How comfortable can you feel with one of them disappearing?

349
00:20:43,740 --> 00:20:47,500
How long can they disappear for? We have an RTO and RPO

350
00:20:47,500 --> 00:20:51,740
podcast that may be helpful in those types of conversations.

351
00:20:51,740 --> 00:20:55,740
But there's so much of this is really just a the servers are

352
00:20:55,740 --> 00:21:01,340
not in and of themselves important. Because no one's

353
00:21:01,340 --> 00:21:03,740
physically touching them the same way a workstation is being

354
00:21:03,740 --> 00:21:05,980
touched. The thing that makes them important is what you're

355
00:21:05,980 --> 00:21:09,100
doing with them. And so if you aren't planning for what

356
00:21:09,100 --> 00:21:11,260
they're going to do, what they're going to do in the future

357
00:21:11,260 --> 00:21:14,540
and how you're going to replace those on a regular schedule,

358
00:21:14,540 --> 00:21:17,100
you're basically in reactive mode hoping something doesn't

359
00:21:17,100 --> 00:21:21,980
break. And that is the part that I feel a lot of people don't

360
00:21:21,980 --> 00:21:23,660
want to think about and definitely don't want to talk

361
00:21:23,660 --> 00:21:29,660
about that. Yeah, I agree. It's it's just like if a workstation

362
00:21:29,660 --> 00:21:32,380
is doing a specific function that we talked about last time

363
00:21:32,380 --> 00:21:35,980
like the shipping computer. What is your business going to

364
00:21:35,980 --> 00:21:40,700
look like if you don't have that running? If you unplugged

365
00:21:40,700 --> 00:21:45,340
your server, what aren't you going to be able to do?

366
00:21:45,340 --> 00:21:50,060
It's always kind of funny where when we're decommissioning

367
00:21:50,060 --> 00:21:53,260
things and I'm sure Matthew has done that set. At some point

368
00:21:53,260 --> 00:21:56,300
you just need to pull the plug if that is turning off the

369
00:21:56,300 --> 00:22:01,660
service and you see what breaks. And we call this a

370
00:22:01,660 --> 00:22:05,820
scream test where we pull the plug and see who screams first

371
00:22:05,820 --> 00:22:09,820
the loudest about something not working anymore. Exactly.

372
00:22:09,820 --> 00:22:13,020
They're bad. We don't want to do that. But sometimes it's a

373
00:22:13,020 --> 00:22:17,820
necessity. And within any transition of these kind of

374
00:22:17,820 --> 00:22:21,820
services, you have that. You have that point where you just

375
00:22:21,820 --> 00:22:26,380
need to you know, you just need to initiate that scream test

376
00:22:26,380 --> 00:22:30,300
see what happens. But that's built in that that should be

377
00:22:30,300 --> 00:22:33,820
something you know about. The extreme case would be like I

378
00:22:33,820 --> 00:22:36,780
wonder what we're running in our environment that depends on

379
00:22:36,780 --> 00:22:39,420
our server and going in the server closet and just pulling

380
00:22:39,420 --> 00:22:42,780
plug. That would be a little extreme so I don't recommend

381
00:22:42,780 --> 00:22:48,060
that. But you know, talking and knowing about the different

382
00:22:48,060 --> 00:22:52,540
functions that occur within your business. That is the place

383
00:22:52,540 --> 00:23:00,460
to start of going what what do people use on a daily basis on

384
00:23:00,460 --> 00:23:07,980
a weekly basis on a monthly basis and is that dependent upon

385
00:23:07,980 --> 00:23:11,980
something that you are responsible for as the business.

386
00:23:11,980 --> 00:23:16,060
Can I make somebody else more responsible for it?

387
00:23:16,060 --> 00:23:20,220
And be able to take some honestly you sleep a little easier

388
00:23:20,220 --> 00:23:26,220
at night. You know, I have had many you know coming back to

389
00:23:26,220 --> 00:23:29,820
our tech days, Matthew. When you mention the mail and a lot of

390
00:23:29,820 --> 00:23:32,620
things can go wrong with services. I just think of

391
00:23:32,620 --> 00:23:39,660
people who may not pay for a static IP right. People you have

392
00:23:39,660 --> 00:23:42,460
to go in and you have to change a record to make sure mail can

393
00:23:42,460 --> 00:23:49,900
flow to the organization again because their IP changed.

394
00:23:49,900 --> 00:23:53,100
They didn't pay for a static one or they couldn't pay for a static

395
00:23:53,100 --> 00:23:56,380
one.

396
00:23:56,380 --> 00:24:00,860
That's just one example of one of the responsibilities you

397
00:24:00,860 --> 00:24:06,780
don't have to worry about anymore. And knowing that your

398
00:24:06,780 --> 00:24:09,740
services are backed up to at least a certain point and

399
00:24:09,740 --> 00:24:13,340
there's other products that help getting it past

400
00:24:13,340 --> 00:24:16,940
the 30 days that Microsoft has. But you don't have to

401
00:24:16,940 --> 00:24:21,660
necessarily pay for that and continue to have that. So

402
00:24:21,660 --> 00:24:27,500
really just peace of mind of moving those things as much as you can

403
00:24:27,500 --> 00:24:32,140
to make it somebody else's responsibility and being able to

404
00:24:32,140 --> 00:24:36,060
have it. One of the big conversations I have

405
00:24:36,060 --> 00:24:39,100
is basically just about that. I have a risk management

406
00:24:39,100 --> 00:24:44,460
conversations constantly. And as part of that we're talking

407
00:24:44,460 --> 00:24:48,220
about transference of risk. Who can we give this risk to so

408
00:24:48,220 --> 00:24:51,420
that it's not on our hands. In this case that's what you're

409
00:24:51,420 --> 00:24:56,060
doing when you move to Exchange Online. I'm showing my age.

410
00:24:56,060 --> 00:24:59,900
When you move to Microsoft 365 is you're saying I trust

411
00:24:59,900 --> 00:25:03,500
Microsoft to do this. Microsoft is taking on that risk for me.

412
00:25:03,500 --> 00:25:06,060
And there are so many things you can do that with. It's why

413
00:25:06,060 --> 00:25:08,780
QuickBooks now has QuickBooks online because they are offering

414
00:25:08,780 --> 00:25:12,300
to take on that risk so you can transfer it from yourself to

415
00:25:12,300 --> 00:25:16,860
them. So many of these things are about doing that.

416
00:25:16,860 --> 00:25:21,020
Servers are a huge upfront cost for a lot of organizations.

417
00:25:21,020 --> 00:25:24,460
The amount you have to pay down just to get those servers in

418
00:25:24,460 --> 00:25:27,980
office and then effectively you're thinking of them as

419
00:25:27,980 --> 00:25:31,420
depreciating assets over the course of their life.

420
00:25:31,420 --> 00:25:34,060
When you move to the cloud most of the time it's

421
00:25:34,060 --> 00:25:37,180
subscription based. So yeah there's still that recurring cost

422
00:25:37,180 --> 00:25:40,780
but it's over time. And one thing that I found that's been

423
00:25:40,780 --> 00:25:43,340
interesting is it doesn't actually it's not actually that

424
00:25:43,340 --> 00:25:45,660
much cheaper to move to the cloud. Sometimes it's a little

425
00:25:45,660 --> 00:25:50,460
more expensive. But because it isn't an upfront cost it does

426
00:25:50,460 --> 00:25:55,340
feel a little better sometimes to just say it's going to be

427
00:25:55,340 --> 00:26:00,140
X amount per month versus I need to drop in some cases and

428
00:26:00,140 --> 00:26:03,820
I did a server replacement not too long ago that was I think

429
00:26:03,820 --> 00:26:09,260
it was $80,000 per server that we were replacing.

430
00:26:09,260 --> 00:26:12,700
And we ended up doing I think five or six hosts for this

431
00:26:12,700 --> 00:26:16,860
organization. And then there was all the servers on top of

432
00:26:16,860 --> 00:26:21,900
that. So for them to move the cloud wasn't an option but the

433
00:26:21,900 --> 00:26:24,780
cost of doing that they were they were looking at I think it

434
00:26:24,780 --> 00:26:27,100
was ended up being close to a half million dollars for the

435
00:26:27,100 --> 00:26:29,820
costs of that after they were done with everything. And

436
00:26:29,820 --> 00:26:33,100
that's again a recurring five-year cost. Now you should

437
00:26:33,100 --> 00:26:34,940
be including that in your budget. You should be ready for

438
00:26:34,940 --> 00:26:37,260
that. But at the same time you're going to want to

439
00:26:37,260 --> 00:26:40,140
mitigate that as much as you can. Technology is important and

440
00:26:40,140 --> 00:26:43,180
you want to spend as much as you have to. But the five-year

441
00:26:43,180 --> 00:26:45,420
cycle gives you time to confirm that's what you have to

442
00:26:45,420 --> 00:26:49,820
spend. And not to harp on about it but again asset

443
00:26:49,820 --> 00:26:52,060
management. You can't confirm that's what you need to

444
00:26:52,060 --> 00:26:54,940
spend if you don't know what you have. Please do asset

445
00:26:54,940 --> 00:26:57,260
management.

446
00:26:58,140 --> 00:27:02,380
Nice. This is a big conversation. I'm glad we split it up

447
00:27:02,380 --> 00:27:05,580
into multiple podcasts today. I want to make sure that

448
00:27:05,580 --> 00:27:08,540
we're covering everything you want to cover. But so what

449
00:27:08,540 --> 00:27:12,940
I've heard from our workstations conversation and our

450
00:27:12,940 --> 00:27:15,340
server conversation it's really important to know what

451
00:27:15,340 --> 00:27:21,100
you have and then where you want to go. And my question is

452
00:27:21,100 --> 00:27:26,060
besides budget because that's always a hurdle. What is the

453
00:27:26,060 --> 00:27:29,900
biggest hurdle that businesses are kind of bumping up to

454
00:27:29,900 --> 00:27:33,740
when they're talking about their server life cycle and

455
00:27:33,740 --> 00:27:37,900
kind of replacement. And then how would you approach that?

456
00:27:37,900 --> 00:27:40,460
I'm going to harp on about it again. It's not knowing what

457
00:27:40,460 --> 00:27:42,460
they have. It's not knowing exactly what they're doing.

458
00:27:42,460 --> 00:27:45,740
They don't. Part of that is maybe they're trusting

459
00:27:45,740 --> 00:27:48,460
someone internally to do it all. But again this is a

460
00:27:48,460 --> 00:27:52,460
business conversation and you need to be aware as

461
00:27:52,460 --> 00:27:55,660
business leaders of exactly what's going on in your

462
00:27:55,660 --> 00:28:00,700
system. If you don't understand part of it or if it just

463
00:28:00,700 --> 00:28:02,700
is kind of one of those things that makes you glaze over

464
00:28:02,700 --> 00:28:05,740
which I fully understand. There are people who fully

465
00:28:05,740 --> 00:28:07,900
glaze over as soon as I start talking I can see it

466
00:28:07,900 --> 00:28:13,020
happen. But it's really about you need to be able to make

467
00:28:13,020 --> 00:28:15,500
an informed decision and if you trust someone else to

468
00:28:15,500 --> 00:28:17,980
make that decision for you that person needs to be in

469
00:28:17,980 --> 00:28:21,420
these discussions. They need to be fully made aware of

470
00:28:21,420 --> 00:28:27,500
what's going on. Because you can't fix what's the

471
00:28:27,500 --> 00:28:33,180
saying. You can't. I've forgotten the saying you

472
00:28:33,180 --> 00:28:36,700
can't fix what you don't understand is not right.

473
00:28:36,700 --> 00:28:42,620
Paraphrasing. Yeah. You can't do this correctly and

474
00:28:42,620 --> 00:28:45,420
save money in a correct and actually financially

475
00:28:45,420 --> 00:28:47,900
responsible way. If you don't know what you're actually

476
00:28:47,900 --> 00:28:50,540
saving money on. And a lot of times when I see people

477
00:28:50,540 --> 00:28:53,420
who still have those all in one service and sadly I

478
00:28:53,420 --> 00:28:55,900
still do see them pretty regularly. It's because

479
00:28:55,900 --> 00:28:58,940
someone said I know a way to do all of this in one for

480
00:28:58,940 --> 00:29:01,980
a small amount of money. Cool. You're going to

481
00:29:01,980 --> 00:29:05,660
experience significant downtime. No question about it.

482
00:29:05,660 --> 00:29:08,140
It's going to happen and I can probably guarantee as we

483
00:29:08,140 --> 00:29:10,220
get closer to that three or four year mark you're

484
00:29:10,220 --> 00:29:13,340
going to experience that downtime once a month. If

485
00:29:13,340 --> 00:29:16,540
not more often than that. So know what you have and

486
00:29:16,540 --> 00:29:18,860
where you're putting it. And that for me is the

487
00:29:18,860 --> 00:29:21,820
the number one biggest hurdle. What about you Andrew.

488
00:29:21,820 --> 00:29:25,340
I would say I would say that's number one. Number two

489
00:29:25,340 --> 00:29:32,060
is vendor availability of does your vendor currently

490
00:29:32,060 --> 00:29:38,860
have an option that you can move to cloud resources.

491
00:29:38,860 --> 00:29:44,060
Not everyone does. And knowing what that is and if

492
00:29:44,060 --> 00:29:48,140
you need to transition from that onsite to the

493
00:29:48,140 --> 00:29:52,620
cloud or a full different system that needs to be

494
00:29:52,620 --> 00:29:57,900
looked at as well. Because if a piece of hardware or

495
00:29:57,900 --> 00:30:02,540
excuse me a piece of software isn't meeting your needs

496
00:30:02,540 --> 00:30:07,500
you know it's you need to assess if it's really the

497
00:30:07,500 --> 00:30:09,900
right program for you. If that's your goal to move to

498
00:30:09,900 --> 00:30:12,460
the cloud and the only thing is keeping you is

499
00:30:12,460 --> 00:30:17,500
you know this this program that does a certain function

500
00:30:17,500 --> 00:30:21,180
most of the time there's another program that can

501
00:30:21,180 --> 00:30:24,940
that can help you with that. And it's again working with

502
00:30:24,940 --> 00:30:28,860
that vendor understanding that and really saying you

503
00:30:28,860 --> 00:30:31,660
know sometimes it's been pushed like I've had a push

504
00:30:31,660 --> 00:30:35,420
vendors of going what options do you have. Like what do

505
00:30:35,420 --> 00:30:38,060
you have anything available or else you know maybe we're

506
00:30:38,060 --> 00:30:39,820
going to have to look somewhere else and that's you

507
00:30:39,820 --> 00:30:42,780
know that that's that's a hard hard hard thing to

508
00:30:42,780 --> 00:30:46,460
swallow sometimes. Because we you know it's the it's a

509
00:30:46,460 --> 00:30:50,220
sunk cost fallacy right. We've spent you know 10 years

510
00:30:50,220 --> 00:30:54,380
and X amount of dollars on training and have so much

511
00:30:54,380 --> 00:30:57,900
invested in it but you know that that's a past

512
00:30:57,900 --> 00:31:01,580
cost. What is going to be your future cost because of

513
00:31:01,580 --> 00:31:06,060
because of this lack of you know cloud transition

514
00:31:06,060 --> 00:31:09,980
or lack of supportability if they're like oh we have to

515
00:31:09,980 --> 00:31:12,940
you know we shut down and or we got bought and we don't

516
00:31:12,940 --> 00:31:17,420
support it anymore. So again it starts with that asset

517
00:31:17,420 --> 00:31:19,980
management of knowing what you have and then knowing what

518
00:31:19,980 --> 00:31:23,660
the options are for each of those.

519
00:31:24,460 --> 00:31:27,420
Thanks. Well we're running low on time so it might be

520
00:31:27,420 --> 00:31:30,380
something that we come back to in the future. I think

521
00:31:30,380 --> 00:31:32,780
these are really important conversations but I just

522
00:31:32,780 --> 00:31:35,500
wanted to thank Matthew and Andrew for joining us

523
00:31:35,500 --> 00:31:39,740
today. Thank you so much. If you enjoyed this podcast

524
00:31:39,740 --> 00:31:42,620
please like subscribe. It's how we know that you're

525
00:31:42,620 --> 00:31:45,660
interested in these topics or if you have a topic you'd

526
00:31:45,660 --> 00:31:51,100
like us to discuss reach out to us at info at cIT-net.com

527
00:31:51,100 --> 00:31:55,260
or head out to our website cIT-net.com

528
00:31:55,260 --> 00:32:13,740
slash podcast and we'll be back next week with an all new episode.

