1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:12,200
Welcome to the Canvas Data Science Meetup Group.

2
00:00:12,200 --> 00:00:14,160
Happy to have you here as always.

3
00:00:14,160 --> 00:00:16,760
So we've got an awesome day ahead of us.

4
00:00:16,760 --> 00:00:21,640
So going to talk about economic surplus today.

5
00:00:21,640 --> 00:00:27,720
So this is an introduction to economics that I've been wanting to do here for a little

6
00:00:27,720 --> 00:00:32,720
while and just got input on the pause,

7
00:00:32,720 --> 00:00:37,200
but the Python saying is now is better than never.

8
00:00:37,200 --> 00:00:41,280
So we'll go ahead and kick off with that today.

9
00:00:41,280 --> 00:00:44,200
Without further ado,

10
00:00:44,200 --> 00:00:47,200
we'll just go ahead and do a quick round of introductions.

11
00:00:47,200 --> 00:00:53,100
That way we can have a nice discussion throughout talking about economics,

12
00:00:53,100 --> 00:00:55,280
plus Canvas data is always today.

13
00:00:55,280 --> 00:00:57,960
So I'm going to start in my top left corner.

14
00:00:57,960 --> 00:01:03,240
So Camila, you wouldn't mind introducing yourself real quick?

15
00:01:03,240 --> 00:01:06,120
Sure. Hi. How are you?

16
00:01:06,120 --> 00:01:07,320
Awesome.

17
00:01:07,320 --> 00:01:11,040
Fine. So I'm Camila Coelho.

18
00:01:11,040 --> 00:01:12,680
I'm an industrial designer.

19
00:01:12,680 --> 00:01:16,760
I'm actually currently studying communication design.

20
00:01:16,760 --> 00:01:20,120
I want to dig in data visualization.

21
00:01:20,120 --> 00:01:23,600
So I was looking for different things around data,

22
00:01:23,600 --> 00:01:26,160
and I'm a cannabis user,

23
00:01:26,160 --> 00:01:28,560
so also it was matching.

24
00:01:28,560 --> 00:01:31,480
So I'm here because of that.

25
00:01:31,600 --> 00:01:34,120
You're in the right spot.

26
00:01:34,120 --> 00:01:36,240
I'm happy to have you.

27
00:01:36,240 --> 00:01:40,000
Ryan, would you introduce yourself, please?

28
00:01:40,000 --> 00:01:42,240
Yes. I'm Ryan.

29
00:01:42,240 --> 00:01:45,000
I'm from Long Island, New York.

30
00:01:45,000 --> 00:01:48,480
I'm an applied math and economics graduate.

31
00:01:48,480 --> 00:01:52,480
Currently doing a bootcamp in data analytics.

32
00:01:52,480 --> 00:01:56,200
I'm a long-time medical cannabis user.

33
00:01:56,200 --> 00:01:58,520
I'm actually winding down on that.

34
00:01:58,520 --> 00:02:02,360
But it's funny, the less I'm using the medical stuff,

35
00:02:02,360 --> 00:02:05,320
the more interested I am in how it works.

36
00:02:05,320 --> 00:02:07,400
Well, awesome to have you, Ryan.

37
00:02:07,400 --> 00:02:10,680
You can keep us on our toes with economics,

38
00:02:10,680 --> 00:02:15,880
and also happy to hear about your experience with the New York market,

39
00:02:15,880 --> 00:02:18,120
because they'll be coming online soon.

40
00:02:18,120 --> 00:02:24,600
So interested to have your experience there.

41
00:02:24,600 --> 00:02:28,040
Awesome. It's been a great review of economics for me.

42
00:02:28,040 --> 00:02:30,080
Awesome. Well, like I said,

43
00:02:30,080 --> 00:02:31,640
keep us on our toes.

44
00:02:31,640 --> 00:02:35,320
Marjorie, would you please introduce yourself?

45
00:02:37,600 --> 00:02:41,440
Hey, everyone. Nice to meet all of you.

46
00:02:41,440 --> 00:02:45,280
I was an academic research scientist for 10 years.

47
00:02:45,280 --> 00:02:51,720
I moved to software engineering and I enjoy cannabis and cannabis data.

48
00:02:51,720 --> 00:02:54,440
So here I am. Nice to meet everyone.

49
00:02:54,440 --> 00:02:57,800
Awesome to have you here, Marjorie.

50
00:02:57,800 --> 00:03:00,600
Heather, would you please introduce yourself,

51
00:03:00,600 --> 00:03:02,880
and then I can go last.

52
00:03:02,880 --> 00:03:05,360
Hey, I'm Heather. I'm not really doing well today,

53
00:03:05,360 --> 00:03:08,240
but just curious for Ryan,

54
00:03:08,240 --> 00:03:12,680
if they still have that pre-packed ground flower in New York still.

55
00:03:12,680 --> 00:03:14,160
We do.

56
00:03:14,160 --> 00:03:16,640
That's unfortunate. I'm so sorry to hear that.

57
00:03:16,640 --> 00:03:19,960
I know. It is what it is.

58
00:03:21,360 --> 00:03:24,440
Okay. I'm so sorry. I'm not really well.

59
00:03:24,440 --> 00:03:26,120
But it's nice meeting everybody.

60
00:03:26,120 --> 00:03:27,320
I'm really happy to be here.

61
00:03:27,320 --> 00:03:30,880
Awesome. Happy to have you here,

62
00:03:30,880 --> 00:03:34,880
Heather. Then Graham, happy to see you here today.

63
00:03:34,880 --> 00:03:36,880
We're just doing a quick round of introduction.

64
00:03:36,880 --> 00:03:38,360
So you wouldn't mind taking

65
00:03:38,360 --> 00:03:42,880
30 seconds and introducing yourself to the group program, and then I'm on.

66
00:03:42,880 --> 00:03:46,560
Yeah. My name is Graham Manischewski.

67
00:03:46,560 --> 00:03:51,440
I live in Maryland where we only have a medical market.

68
00:03:51,440 --> 00:03:57,240
But I used to be a data scientist working in space.

69
00:03:57,240 --> 00:04:00,400
I was a contractor with SpaceX.

70
00:04:00,400 --> 00:04:06,040
But I got hit with a deadly disease and it's forever changed me.

71
00:04:06,040 --> 00:04:08,920
As you can see, I shake while I talk.

72
00:04:08,920 --> 00:04:13,120
But cannabis is my medicine.

73
00:04:13,120 --> 00:04:17,360
I'd like to use my skills in data science.

74
00:04:17,360 --> 00:04:21,360
I have a master's in mathematics and deep learning.

75
00:04:21,360 --> 00:04:26,440
So I have a deep basis of understanding with,

76
00:04:26,440 --> 00:04:29,440
I guess, the model of all this.

77
00:04:29,440 --> 00:04:32,040
I've studied supply chain management,

78
00:04:32,040 --> 00:04:35,200
economic PDEs, all that stuff.

79
00:04:35,200 --> 00:04:38,640
I just don't know all the terminology

80
00:04:38,640 --> 00:04:46,440
I guess with this and I'm just looking to see if I can search for

81
00:04:46,440 --> 00:04:54,000
a job opportunity once I get through all this rehab to use my skills in cannabis.

82
00:04:54,000 --> 00:05:00,840
I'm really interested to see what data science models we were looking for.

83
00:05:00,840 --> 00:05:04,360
Because I was pretty confused on Saturday.

84
00:05:04,360 --> 00:05:09,280
Exactly. So happy to have you.

85
00:05:09,280 --> 00:05:13,440
Graham, you can keep us on our toes too because your experience with

86
00:05:13,440 --> 00:05:17,280
data science will just keep everybody sharp.

87
00:05:17,280 --> 00:05:23,640
There's a high demand for people with your skill set in the cannabis industry.

88
00:05:23,640 --> 00:05:26,000
So happy to have you aboard.

89
00:05:26,000 --> 00:05:28,480
Yeah. I should also say,

90
00:05:28,480 --> 00:05:34,320
I am a heavy smoker and I've been smoking for about a decade.

91
00:05:34,320 --> 00:05:37,240
I don't know your guys' experience,

92
00:05:37,240 --> 00:05:41,120
but I've been around the game for a while.

93
00:05:41,120 --> 00:05:43,400
Let's just say that.

94
00:05:44,080 --> 00:05:49,360
Well, always happy to hear about your experience too.

95
00:05:49,360 --> 00:05:51,760
Heather's also in Maryland too.

96
00:05:51,760 --> 00:06:00,760
So yeah, it'll be interesting to have all of your experiences.

97
00:06:00,760 --> 00:06:07,840
Just to get you into the conversation, Mel.

98
00:06:07,840 --> 00:06:10,480
We're just doing a round of introductions.

99
00:06:10,480 --> 00:06:14,200
So you wouldn't mind introducing yourself to the group real quick.

100
00:06:14,200 --> 00:06:16,880
Hi everybody.

101
00:06:16,880 --> 00:06:22,760
I just ran into this meetup.

102
00:06:22,760 --> 00:06:25,440
I was just interested.

103
00:06:25,440 --> 00:06:30,320
I've been working as a data scientist for the past few years.

104
00:06:30,320 --> 00:06:34,680
So I just wanted to see what you can do with cannabis data.

105
00:06:34,680 --> 00:06:38,760
Because in the recent years, cannabis market has been growing.

106
00:06:38,760 --> 00:06:42,880
Personally, I don't smoke or do any.

107
00:06:42,880 --> 00:06:46,720
Yeah. So I was just curious.

108
00:06:47,200 --> 00:06:49,200
Well, happy to have you.

109
00:06:49,200 --> 00:06:50,800
There's people from all walks of life here.

110
00:06:50,800 --> 00:06:56,960
So we're a big married group of data scientists.

111
00:06:56,960 --> 00:06:58,280
So this is awesome.

112
00:06:58,280 --> 00:07:01,960
So a lot of skills here in this group today.

113
00:07:01,960 --> 00:07:05,120
So we can definitely get a lot accomplished.

114
00:07:05,120 --> 00:07:09,000
And then yet another guest.

115
00:07:09,000 --> 00:07:15,320
So please correct me if I'm not pronouncing correctly, but Dharampal.

116
00:07:15,320 --> 00:07:18,480
Yeah, thank you.

117
00:07:18,480 --> 00:07:19,760
Yeah, it's Dharampal.

118
00:07:19,760 --> 00:07:22,920
You can call me DP for the short one.

119
00:07:22,920 --> 00:07:25,280
Actually, you know, first time I joined here.

120
00:07:25,280 --> 00:07:29,120
And, you know, I just set up the Google Meet, in fact,

121
00:07:29,120 --> 00:07:32,000
because I joined the meetup group recently.

122
00:07:32,000 --> 00:07:38,600
And every time like some one or other group is being used to have these discussions.

123
00:07:38,600 --> 00:07:42,000
So today I was late because of that one.

124
00:07:42,000 --> 00:07:45,400
And I had to set it up like with my short name as DP.

125
00:07:45,400 --> 00:07:49,720
So that is easy for everyone to pronounce.

126
00:07:49,720 --> 00:07:51,040
Awesome. Thank you.

127
00:07:51,040 --> 00:07:52,360
Well, happy to have you, DP.

128
00:07:52,360 --> 00:07:57,280
So we're a big group of married data scientists here.

129
00:07:57,280 --> 00:07:58,840
So my name is Keegan.

130
00:07:58,840 --> 00:08:00,800
So I started a company, Cantlitics.

131
00:08:00,800 --> 00:08:07,480
So my experience was working in the cannabis testing space.

132
00:08:07,480 --> 00:08:16,200
And so I thought, well, we can probably utilize my experience as a,

133
00:08:16,200 --> 00:08:21,880
you know, number cruncher statistician and help people set up data pipelines.

134
00:08:21,880 --> 00:08:26,160
And so working in the industry for a while,

135
00:08:26,160 --> 00:08:32,160
I realized there's a really big demand for data analytics, data science.

136
00:08:32,160 --> 00:08:38,440
And so I thought I would share with you some of the issues at hand,

137
00:08:38,440 --> 00:08:43,080
what people are talking about, where some of the data can be found,

138
00:08:43,080 --> 00:08:47,800
and what analytics you can do with, you know, real public data.

139
00:08:47,800 --> 00:08:52,800
So it's almost like there's just gold laying there right on the table.

140
00:08:52,800 --> 00:08:55,480
So there's just, you know, treasure to be had.

141
00:08:55,480 --> 00:09:03,200
And you all have the skill set to go out there and mine some data treasure.

142
00:09:03,200 --> 00:09:09,000
So long story short, I can just show you some data sources today,

143
00:09:09,000 --> 00:09:16,840
just to talk about a little bit of economics and just show you what you can potentially do.

144
00:09:16,840 --> 00:09:21,880
And then I'm happy to hear from all of you about,

145
00:09:21,880 --> 00:09:24,960
you know, what you may be curious about doing with the data,

146
00:09:24,960 --> 00:09:27,840
because this is just my perspective on the data.

147
00:09:27,840 --> 00:09:30,920
I come from an economics background.

148
00:09:30,920 --> 00:09:39,000
So as Graham pointed out, so on Saturday, we talked about the statistical model,

149
00:09:39,000 --> 00:09:40,880
the instrumental variable model.

150
00:09:40,880 --> 00:09:45,720
So tune in on Saturday and we'll talk about this again likely.

151
00:09:45,720 --> 00:09:53,240
And so long story short, Graham's keeping me on my toes, Mel, Camilla, Ryan,

152
00:09:53,240 --> 00:09:55,400
DP, Marjana, and Heather.

153
00:09:55,400 --> 00:09:59,560
So we can all keep each other on our toes here.

154
00:09:59,560 --> 00:10:05,720
So without further ado, I'll just go ahead and spend a little bit of time here

155
00:10:05,720 --> 00:10:11,440
and just introduce to you some economics and some data

156
00:10:11,440 --> 00:10:15,320
that I've been looking at in Illinois and Massachusetts.

157
00:10:15,320 --> 00:10:20,840
And then we can have a discussion about that.

158
00:10:20,840 --> 00:10:27,560
Anyone want to say anything real quick?

159
00:10:27,560 --> 00:10:33,240
Not as such, but, you know, I'm not sure like why, because I just, as I said,

160
00:10:33,240 --> 00:10:35,440
like, OK, I'm for the first time here.

161
00:10:35,440 --> 00:10:39,240
So I recently started doing this data science work.

162
00:10:39,240 --> 00:10:45,600
And, you know, I tried to find out, like, if in my existing organization,

163
00:10:45,600 --> 00:10:52,320
if I can find some opportunities to do some data analytics or this kind of work,

164
00:10:52,320 --> 00:10:57,160
basically, like what data can tell me basically, because right now what we know

165
00:10:57,160 --> 00:11:00,920
is what we know, but what we don't know is something like the patterns,

166
00:11:00,920 --> 00:11:07,160
the hidden patterns within the data which can tell us, OK, hey, you may,

167
00:11:07,160 --> 00:11:12,080
you know, work on certain things. So it's just my thing is like just a startup.

168
00:11:12,080 --> 00:11:15,120
I really don't know, like, what I'm going to discover here.

169
00:11:15,120 --> 00:11:22,000
So but you said, like the economics and like some of the other things.

170
00:11:22,000 --> 00:11:24,360
I'm excited, basically. I'm sorry.

171
00:11:24,360 --> 00:11:27,280
I would be like, OK, more curious to have a lot of questions.

172
00:11:27,280 --> 00:11:31,840
But right now I don't have any questions, but we will see what exactly you present

173
00:11:31,840 --> 00:11:34,200
and based on that, we will go forward.

174
00:11:34,200 --> 00:11:37,280
Awesome, GP. I got a couple of questions.

175
00:11:37,280 --> 00:11:38,800
Oh, yes, Graham.

176
00:11:38,800 --> 00:11:47,880
I would like to know the any of the rules and regulations with like people growing and stuff.

177
00:11:47,880 --> 00:11:51,720
I only say that because in Maryland, they are very strict.

178
00:11:51,720 --> 00:11:55,400
You have to grow it in a specific place.

179
00:11:55,400 --> 00:12:00,840
And there's only so many grow sites you can have in terms of this.

180
00:12:00,840 --> 00:12:07,080
But I've heard in New England and stuff, they have a little free array

181
00:12:07,080 --> 00:12:15,000
to have small like cannabis companies and small dispensaries to start up.

182
00:12:15,000 --> 00:12:25,840
Yes, so we'll be looking today just to add, you know, the Massachusetts.

183
00:12:25,840 --> 00:12:30,360
Cannabis Control Commission, so different

184
00:12:30,360 --> 00:12:37,640
states have put together their own bodies to legislate cannabis.

185
00:12:37,640 --> 00:12:44,400
So definitely a state by state basis at the moment, because as you're all aware,

186
00:12:44,400 --> 00:12:48,520
cannabis is still not permitted federally.

187
00:12:48,520 --> 00:12:57,360
So basically, certain states have enacted legislation to allow

188
00:12:57,360 --> 00:13:00,960
or to permit people to operate in their states.

189
00:13:00,960 --> 00:13:12,280
So. So exactly. So as Graham pointed out, so in Maryland, Maryland has their own legislative body.

190
00:13:12,280 --> 00:13:19,760
You know, I don't know it off the top of my head, but, you know, you can just probably do a search,

191
00:13:19,760 --> 00:13:27,160
you know, Maryland cannabis regulators, do you know, Heather, what the body may be?

192
00:13:27,160 --> 00:13:33,120
By body, well, one thing I know is there's a number of there are only certain number of licenses

193
00:13:33,120 --> 00:13:37,880
that can be distributed and you can actually see the names of all the testing,

194
00:13:37,880 --> 00:13:40,680
the three testing sites as well in Maryland.

195
00:13:40,680 --> 00:13:44,880
So there are very few of those, quite the monopoly at the testing site.

196
00:13:44,880 --> 00:13:46,840
Just want to say there.

197
00:13:46,840 --> 00:13:55,760
And then also certain brands like Colta will actually prevent dispensaries from giving coupons or other discounts.

198
00:13:55,760 --> 00:14:02,400
That's something that they can do. So all this market data can be completely blown up by Colta.

199
00:14:02,400 --> 00:14:09,000
Yeah. So just want to say that that's maybe a bias coming in there, but that's just my opinion is that,

200
00:14:09,000 --> 00:14:13,360
well, it's my observation is that there are companies in Maryland that can dictate

201
00:14:13,360 --> 00:14:18,320
when and how discounts are applied to the customer. Thank you.

202
00:14:18,320 --> 00:14:30,920
And may I just add on to that too, there is a pretty heavy monopoly, oligopoly on the grow sites in Maryland as well.

203
00:14:30,920 --> 00:14:41,760
There are only several small town grow operations that still have licenses to grow and sell.

204
00:14:41,760 --> 00:14:47,680
G-Leaf has bought out over 75 percent of the market.

205
00:14:47,680 --> 00:14:53,080
Yes. So it's very difficult to do price action with them.

206
00:14:53,080 --> 00:14:58,280
That is basically what they said. Everyone has to follow.

207
00:14:58,280 --> 00:15:03,680
It's really awful in Maryland. Thank you, Graham. Thank you.

208
00:15:03,680 --> 00:15:11,000
I spend over twenty thousand dollars a year on my medicine. I have to use it constantly.

209
00:15:11,000 --> 00:15:16,240
I believe you. I believe you. And I live that. So please know that.

210
00:15:16,240 --> 00:15:23,920
Yeah, I hate Colta too. They have a bad rep involved more in Maryland now.

211
00:15:23,920 --> 00:15:29,000
You've brought up an interesting point here. Serious. Thank you.

212
00:15:29,000 --> 00:15:38,400
Because this is exactly what we're here to do is essentially we need to get this data that's locked up here with,

213
00:15:38,400 --> 00:15:41,520
you know, the Maryland Medical Cannabis Commission.

214
00:15:41,520 --> 00:15:56,240
And as you exactly said, try to quantify, you know, is Maryland sort of in the oligopolistic competition?

215
00:15:56,240 --> 00:16:02,360
You know, so it's a long story short. You know, do these producers have a lot of monopoly power?

216
00:16:02,360 --> 00:16:09,080
And, you know, can they raise prices on consumers like yourself?

217
00:16:09,080 --> 00:16:19,480
So. So, look, long story short, we need to start getting this data and making it accessible.

218
00:16:19,480 --> 00:16:33,000
This is sort of been a side project of Camp Lytics here is we would love to be able to get data in regulations for each of the states.

219
00:16:33,000 --> 00:16:50,720
So and make it publicly available so that way. You know, we can just know off the top of our head what the regulations are in Maryland or Massachusetts or Illinois or where have you.

220
00:16:50,720 --> 00:16:56,200
So if you want to contribute that started these two projects here.

221
00:16:56,200 --> 00:17:03,520
So, you know, we've just started the Cannabis Data Science Meetup Group, where we just do a little bit of exploratory analysis,

222
00:17:03,520 --> 00:17:09,960
try to find data from various states and just begin crunching statistics.

223
00:17:09,960 --> 00:17:16,120
And then if you want a more formalized project, putting together Camp Lytics AI,

224
00:17:16,120 --> 00:17:30,480
which will essentially just try to scrape all of the various states so that way we can collect data from Alaska, Arizona, California,

225
00:17:30,480 --> 00:17:36,240
you know, all the way through Maryland and all the way to Washington state.

226
00:17:36,240 --> 00:17:52,480
So that way we can actually compare how these different states are functioning here, because as you pointed out, it doesn't seem like Maryland's very competitive.

227
00:17:52,480 --> 00:17:57,600
So it would be interesting to quantify that.

228
00:17:57,600 --> 00:18:05,680
So thank you for bringing that point up, Graham.

229
00:18:05,680 --> 00:18:15,680
Well, without further ado, let's talk about some of the economics while we're at it, and then we can show you how

230
00:18:15,680 --> 00:18:26,360
or I can show you how I've begun to scrape data from Illinois and Massachusetts publicly available resources.

231
00:18:26,360 --> 00:18:41,200
So, and Ryan, you can attest to this, so I would always tell people, you know, the reason you study economics is so that you don't get fooled by economists.

232
00:18:41,200 --> 00:18:49,520
And so this quote goes back to an economist who was born a hundred years ago.

233
00:18:49,520 --> 00:18:57,000
And, you know, make of it what you will, but I always get a good laugh out of this quote.

234
00:18:57,000 --> 00:19:05,400
And so, you know, I'm going to be talking about economics today, but, you know, don't, you know, don't get fooled by me.

235
00:19:05,400 --> 00:19:17,720
If anything sounds counterintuitive or doesn't make logical sense to you, then question it and think about it deeply.

236
00:19:17,720 --> 00:19:29,360
Because, you know, good economics, you know, should be, you know, be able to be explained quickly and simply.

237
00:19:29,360 --> 00:19:36,160
Can I just add quickly, I think that quote is so important, especially in a day where there's

238
00:19:36,160 --> 00:19:45,520
where policymakers are just throwing up these big spending bills, big economics plans, saying stuff like, you know, this is not going to cost you anything.

239
00:19:45,520 --> 00:19:53,040
And they cite these economists. This is why it's important that everyone kind of needs to know what exactly is happening.

240
00:19:53,040 --> 00:20:00,640
I mean, obviously for here, but just in general, like, I think everyone having a basis in economics is so important.

241
00:20:00,640 --> 00:20:07,640
I wish there'd be more done in the K through 12 education in relation to that.

242
00:20:07,640 --> 00:20:17,600
Exactly. So that, you know, falls on the presenter a lot because it's a it's a high bar.

243
00:20:17,600 --> 00:20:28,000
But, you know, I believe that, you know, if you firmly have concepts under your belt, that you should be able to convey them to to anyone.

244
00:20:28,000 --> 00:20:40,800
So. So exactly. So, like you said, less hand waving and more, you know, making sure that everybody's on board and.

245
00:20:40,800 --> 00:20:44,680
Yeah, like you said, don't just don't just take things for granted.

246
00:20:44,680 --> 00:20:49,840
So. So. Awesome, Ryan.

247
00:20:49,840 --> 00:20:59,360
So so as you can see, Ryan's schooled in economics and is pretty skeptical.

248
00:20:59,360 --> 00:21:10,480
OK, anywho, we've begun to basically look at the number of retailers and then the.

249
00:21:10,480 --> 00:21:18,080
Revenue per retailer as sort of a metric of profitability.

250
00:21:18,080 --> 00:21:36,240
And so. What we're trying to uncover is, you know, are there essentially rules in place that may make certain places more profitable for retailers or producers to operate in?

251
00:21:36,240 --> 00:21:43,880
And, you know, conversely, there's a other side of that coin there.

252
00:21:43,880 --> 00:21:53,120
I'm actually going to to back up to this. I just going to start start here, I think.

253
00:21:53,120 --> 00:22:01,560
So, you know, basically, you know, the reason we're talking about this is, you know, there's no essentially two sides to the coin here.

254
00:22:01,560 --> 00:22:09,880
Right. So, yes, it's awesome, you know, for the producers to, you know, make a nice surplus here.

255
00:22:09,880 --> 00:22:14,600
But, you know, the consumers are operating in the market, too.

256
00:22:14,600 --> 00:22:25,520
And. You know, they get a certain amount of value out of their purchases.

257
00:22:25,520 --> 00:22:29,320
And so you can begin to quantify this.

258
00:22:29,320 --> 00:22:36,400
So, you know, if you just look at the quantity sold in the market and the prices,

259
00:22:36,400 --> 00:22:45,440
if there weren't any anti-competitive forces and it was just free information and just,

260
00:22:45,440 --> 00:22:53,560
you know, no transaction costs and just everything just worked out frictionless,

261
00:22:53,560 --> 00:23:01,400
then you would experience what's called the perfectly competitive market equilibrium.

262
00:23:01,400 --> 00:23:08,040
And so here, you know, marginal benefit is exactly equal to marginal cost.

263
00:23:08,040 --> 00:23:13,000
And, you know, you've got what's called like an efficient market.

264
00:23:13,000 --> 00:23:21,440
So this is sort of the idea that everything's compared to.

265
00:23:21,440 --> 00:23:28,520
What you observe, you know, in reality is, you know, you observe things such as, you know, taxes.

266
00:23:28,520 --> 00:23:33,280
So, you know, various market markets will be taxed.

267
00:23:33,280 --> 00:23:38,280
And so, you know, cannabis is one of the goods that is taxed.

268
00:23:38,280 --> 00:23:42,520
And there are various reasons why you may do a tax.

269
00:23:42,520 --> 00:23:51,280
So, for example, you see do see taxes on other goods, such as, say, alcohol or cigarettes.

270
00:23:51,280 --> 00:23:58,360
And one reason you can do a tax is just to discourage consumption.

271
00:23:58,360 --> 00:24:06,320
So, you know, that's a way that people have discouraged cigarette consumption is just

272
00:24:06,320 --> 00:24:09,960
by levying a high tax on it.

273
00:24:09,960 --> 00:24:16,280
And then, you know, you'll, you know, reduce consumption and, you know,

274
00:24:16,280 --> 00:24:26,160
you'll get this tax revenue and then you can spend that on other, in other markets

275
00:24:26,160 --> 00:24:30,600
that you may think have what's called like, you know, public externality.

276
00:24:30,600 --> 00:24:36,560
So, basically, you know, the government will sort of redistribute, you know,

277
00:24:36,560 --> 00:24:41,600
this tax revenue from the cannabis market to another market.

278
00:24:41,600 --> 00:24:48,480
So, you'll see maybe they'll, you know, subsidize some, you know,

279
00:24:48,480 --> 00:24:52,560
so they'll add more funding to education.

280
00:24:52,560 --> 00:24:56,080
And so, that's a whole other market of its own.

281
00:24:56,080 --> 00:25:04,400
So, long story short, this is what the effect of a tax is.

282
00:25:04,400 --> 00:25:11,640
And so, as you can see, some consumers are boxed out of the market and, you know,

283
00:25:11,640 --> 00:25:18,160
the producers lose out on a bit of their surplus as well.

284
00:25:18,160 --> 00:25:22,840
So, taxes is one thing.

285
00:25:22,840 --> 00:25:33,320
The main thing that I was interested in was the comparable effect that you see just

286
00:25:33,320 --> 00:25:36,320
from say quantity restrictions.

287
00:25:36,320 --> 00:25:43,800
So, here there's no taxes levied, but you're just going to restrict the, you know,

288
00:25:43,800 --> 00:25:49,280
the total quantity that can be allowed in the market.

289
00:25:49,280 --> 00:26:00,680
And I see this happening in many states, and it's hard to, you know, think of, you know,

290
00:26:00,680 --> 00:26:07,960
the social reason for this, except, you know, except if yet again, you know,

291
00:26:07,960 --> 00:26:13,520
people were sort of interested in, you know, curtailing cannabis consumption.

292
00:26:13,520 --> 00:26:16,960
And that would just be for, you know, social preferences.

293
00:26:16,960 --> 00:26:24,320
And so, you know, maybe, but that's a conversation for.

294
00:26:24,320 --> 00:26:30,560
Are you talking restrictions on the consumer to buy a certain amount of cannabis

295
00:26:30,560 --> 00:26:36,600
or restrictions on the supplier of the cannabis to the market?

296
00:26:36,600 --> 00:26:39,880
Exactly. This will just be on the actual supply.

297
00:26:39,880 --> 00:26:52,600
So, basically, what my argument is, is if the state says that there can only be 20 cultivators,

298
00:26:52,600 --> 00:26:58,920
well, normally there may, you know, in other states you observe, you know,

299
00:26:58,920 --> 00:27:02,360
100 or 200 or more cultivators.

300
00:27:02,360 --> 00:27:09,920
So, my argument is that you would normally see a larger quantity supplied,

301
00:27:09,920 --> 00:27:18,160
but they're essentially, you know, restricting the quantity, you know, to be a certain amount.

302
00:27:18,160 --> 00:27:31,800
Of course, I just realized this is maybe not the perfect example because you could just have, well,

303
00:27:31,800 --> 00:27:37,520
the idea is this would, if this was a monopoly,

304
00:27:37,520 --> 00:27:43,400
the monopoly list would choose to operate, you know, less than competitively.

305
00:27:43,400 --> 00:27:51,760
So, that way they can, you know, set, you know, set prices to maximize their profit.

306
00:27:51,760 --> 00:27:57,760
And so, the idea is if you're operating, you know, between, you know,

307
00:27:57,760 --> 00:28:03,880
like the perfectly competitive in some way with more of an oligopoly,

308
00:28:03,880 --> 00:28:15,480
then you would expect, you know, prices to be, you know, towards, you know, QM.

309
00:28:15,480 --> 00:28:34,040
So, so my, so, so long story short is my argument is by restricting just the number of licensees,

310
00:28:34,040 --> 00:28:42,240
that that's sort of effectively, you know, sort of restricting QC towards QM.

311
00:28:42,240 --> 00:28:46,040
I'm not saying it's going to be perfectly at QM.

312
00:28:46,040 --> 00:28:57,240
I'm just saying that I think that having restrictions is going to push things in that direction.

313
00:28:57,240 --> 00:29:04,640
Is it safe to say that having more restrictions would make, I guess, the supplier kind of blanking out here,

314
00:29:04,640 --> 00:29:10,320
but it would make it more inelastic, meaning that if there was a tax levied or something

315
00:29:10,320 --> 00:29:23,000
that the price burden would be placed much more on the consumers due to these restrictions.

316
00:29:23,000 --> 00:29:24,520
You do raise a good point.

317
00:29:24,520 --> 00:29:31,600
So, in fact, that actually goes right back to this point of who bears the cost of the tax.

318
00:29:31,600 --> 00:29:32,920
It depends.

319
00:29:32,920 --> 00:29:41,800
So, so as you basically said, whoever basically has the more inelastic either demand or supply

320
00:29:41,800 --> 00:29:52,120
typically bears the bigger burden of either a tax or the quantity restriction.

321
00:29:52,120 --> 00:30:00,920
So that's a whole other question of its own is, you know, what exactly is the elasticity of demand

322
00:30:00,920 --> 00:30:07,400
and what's the elasticity of supply?

323
00:30:07,400 --> 00:30:10,120
And I actually don't know.

324
00:30:10,120 --> 00:30:18,920
And so those are, you know, some metrics that I think are maybe they've been looked at in the literature,

325
00:30:18,920 --> 00:30:28,400
but, you know, these are things that, you know, a group like ours could begin to estimate.

326
00:30:28,400 --> 00:30:34,160
There is work on it in like botany circles.

327
00:30:34,160 --> 00:30:39,000
On the elasticity of supply?

328
00:30:39,000 --> 00:30:50,800
Yeah, in terms of how quickly you can turn it over, how consistent the supply can be versus how finicky can be.

329
00:30:50,800 --> 00:30:56,720
Because we have diseases in here with the supply, there's outlier things,

330
00:30:56,720 --> 00:31:11,160
and they're trying to clean out the outlier things so we can get a more foundationally appropriate estimate of this elasticity.

331
00:31:11,160 --> 00:31:16,360
Graham, do you know if these studies were done on a state or federal level?

332
00:31:16,360 --> 00:31:28,680
I believe I know NC State is doing research in hemp production and what does higher yield rate,

333
00:31:28,680 --> 00:31:36,560
what's correlated with a more consistent or a higher yield rate product in hemp only.

334
00:31:36,560 --> 00:31:41,800
But there's also research in Washington.

335
00:31:41,800 --> 00:31:44,600
I know Washington State University.

336
00:31:44,600 --> 00:31:55,280
They do a lot of research on studying diseases in cannabis, though, because it's more botany based, less economics.

337
00:31:55,280 --> 00:32:07,120
But they are doing research to try and standardize production, both indoor and outdoor, on a grow level.

338
00:32:07,120 --> 00:32:11,720
Awesome. OK, I need to pause for five minutes here.

339
00:32:11,720 --> 00:32:26,520
So can you please continue this conversation and then I'll be right back to talk about the quantity restrictions here and maybe how we can parse this out in Illinois.

340
00:32:26,520 --> 00:32:31,160
So bear with me. I'll be back in five minutes.

341
00:32:31,160 --> 00:32:37,040
So short break here. So bear with me here.

342
00:32:37,040 --> 00:32:38,600
All right.

343
00:32:38,600 --> 00:32:40,000
Be right back.

344
00:32:40,000 --> 00:32:44,680
So out of this group, how many people use cannabis here?

345
00:32:44,680 --> 00:32:47,920
I do. I have to.

346
00:32:47,920 --> 00:32:53,360
I absolutely have to every day. Otherwise, I will be in a massive amount of pain and suffering.

347
00:32:53,360 --> 00:32:55,320
Thank you.

348
00:32:55,320 --> 00:33:08,800
It's just interesting to see here because there's different perspectives when it comes to people use it versus outside perspectives.

349
00:33:08,800 --> 00:33:19,480
And one thing I've realized through coming through these meetups is that you need both because users of it are biased to it.

350
00:33:19,480 --> 00:33:23,520
But people that don't use it have no idea.

351
00:33:23,520 --> 00:33:35,080
Because let me be honest, you really can't look at this as a purely economic thing because the grow part of it hasn't been figured out yet.

352
00:33:35,080 --> 00:33:41,920
And in terms of that quantity, it varies randomly.

353
00:33:41,920 --> 00:33:59,560
There is a company in Canada that got billions of dollars of funding and they went bankrupt because all of their crops were infected with mites and couldn't be used.

354
00:33:59,560 --> 00:34:06,960
So we do have to be wary when we're talking about this.

355
00:34:06,960 --> 00:34:14,880
But I understand. And it's really important that we get this economic thing down.

356
00:34:14,880 --> 00:34:20,080
And that's why I'm really motivated to do this.

357
00:34:20,080 --> 00:34:24,280
Because the Maryland, it's all for profit.

358
00:34:24,280 --> 00:34:27,320
And it really stinks.

359
00:34:27,320 --> 00:34:28,920
Thank you.

360
00:34:28,920 --> 00:34:31,200
That's something that needs to be acknowledged.

361
00:34:31,200 --> 00:34:33,200
And I'm glad that you're voicing that here.

362
00:34:33,200 --> 00:34:36,520
Thank you so much.

363
00:34:36,520 --> 00:34:43,200
But I will fully acknowledge I know nothing about economics of this stuff.

364
00:34:43,200 --> 00:34:54,040
I know a lot about the chemical makeup of it, physics, and just the experience of it.

365
00:34:54,040 --> 00:34:59,320
Because I've been taking data for the past two and a half years.

366
00:34:59,320 --> 00:35:01,560
I was told I was going to die.

367
00:35:01,560 --> 00:35:04,320
And here I am.

368
00:35:04,320 --> 00:35:09,880
So, so yeah, just just background for you folks who don't know.

369
00:35:09,880 --> 00:35:13,360
Thank you. Thank you, Graham.

370
00:35:13,360 --> 00:35:14,720
Awesome.

371
00:35:14,720 --> 00:35:16,560
Thank you for sharing your story.

372
00:35:16,560 --> 00:35:25,720
Well, with migrating here, so just getting resituated.

373
00:35:25,720 --> 00:35:32,240
It's awesome to have you, though, because, you know, essentially, you know, I can share what I know from economics.

374
00:35:32,240 --> 00:35:34,520
You can bring your mathematics.

375
00:35:34,520 --> 00:35:37,680
Ryan can keep us sharp with economics.

376
00:35:37,680 --> 00:35:40,720
And then Heather's got the laboratory background.

377
00:35:40,720 --> 00:35:43,400
Marjana knows statistics.

378
00:35:43,400 --> 00:35:48,040
Camilla's got data science, EP got data science as well.

379
00:35:48,040 --> 00:35:55,240
So I think with the group assembled just here today, there's so much value that we can add.

380
00:35:55,240 --> 00:36:06,840
So so without further ado, I'll go ahead and just conclude real quick here with the economics and then show you how to get some data.

381
00:36:06,840 --> 00:36:14,520
And then we can begin systematically collecting it for all the various states.

382
00:36:14,520 --> 00:36:27,400
So. And I'll move through this quick.

383
00:36:27,400 --> 00:36:38,560
So the idea is if you had a monopolist in the market that they would operate at QM.

384
00:36:38,560 --> 00:36:44,160
You know, of course, we don't observe, you know, a.

385
00:36:44,160 --> 00:36:55,640
An actual monopolist and we don't observe an actual perfectly competitive market, so we observe someplace in between.

386
00:36:55,640 --> 00:37:07,800
So I'm just conjecturing that if you see things that restrict the number of players that can operate in the market,

387
00:37:07,800 --> 00:37:16,280
that you may expect this to observe a queue that's closer to QM than QC.

388
00:37:16,280 --> 00:37:19,480
This is just pure conjecture of mine.

389
00:37:19,480 --> 00:37:28,400
And it may not be the case because as we were talking about, like it depends a lot on the elasticity.

390
00:37:28,400 --> 00:37:34,360
So the elasticity is essentially the angle of the supply curve.

391
00:37:34,360 --> 00:37:39,360
So the flatter the supply curve is, the more elastic it is.

392
00:37:39,360 --> 00:37:48,200
So basically, the more elastic the supply curve, the producers aren't really going to be that affected one way or the other.

393
00:37:48,200 --> 00:37:53,280
They're going to have to apply a restriction in.

394
00:37:53,280 --> 00:38:02,400
In quantity caps. So if if, you know, supplies very elastic and they restrict it to one.

395
00:38:02,400 --> 00:38:07,400
Producer that producer may still operate somewhere near the competitive market,

396
00:38:07,400 --> 00:38:13,080
the competitive level, if the elasticity is really.

397
00:38:13,080 --> 00:38:18,360
But if it's very inelastic.

398
00:38:18,360 --> 00:38:22,040
The elasticity is very high.

399
00:38:22,040 --> 00:38:28,560
But it's very inelastic. So if supply is close to vertical.

400
00:38:28,560 --> 00:38:34,360
Or if there's any elastic demand, if demand is close to vertical.

401
00:38:34,360 --> 00:38:42,800
Then they're going then either the consumers or the suppliers are going to bear a large cost from restrictions.

402
00:38:42,800 --> 00:38:50,400
So there's various reasons why you may think supply may be inelastic.

403
00:38:50,400 --> 00:38:55,760
And there's arguments why you could argue that demand would be inelastic.

404
00:38:55,760 --> 00:39:02,320
Some people, right, they're going to consume whether the price is low or very high.

405
00:39:02,320 --> 00:39:09,920
They're just going to arguably there'll be some people that get boxed out.

406
00:39:09,920 --> 00:39:18,120
So once again, you can break the market up into different segments of demand.

407
00:39:18,120 --> 00:39:22,200
But but long story short is.

408
00:39:22,200 --> 00:39:31,320
My hypothesis is, and this is just going to be my beginning attempt at trying to to go about studying it.

409
00:39:31,320 --> 00:39:38,000
So this is sort of just my rough draft, you know, just my rough analysis here in front of you.

410
00:39:38,000 --> 00:39:42,680
But basically what I'm thinking is, right, we're not going to observe QC.

411
00:39:42,680 --> 00:39:47,480
We're not going to observe QM. However, in all the various states,

412
00:39:47,480 --> 00:39:56,880
I think we're going to observe some Q somewhere in between here, some price somewhere in between here.

413
00:39:56,880 --> 00:40:06,840
With certain states being closer to the monopolistic side and certain states being closer to the competitive side.

414
00:40:06,840 --> 00:40:10,840
Noting that all the states are going to be different.

415
00:40:10,840 --> 00:40:15,120
So that right, all the states have different populations.

416
00:40:15,120 --> 00:40:19,600
All the states have different factors that affect their supply.

417
00:40:19,600 --> 00:40:26,840
So supply and demand are going to be different in all the various states, and they're going to be different over time.

418
00:40:26,840 --> 00:40:43,160
So you're going to expect prices and quantities to either be shifting along the. Curve over time as policies may change, or you know, you may see.

419
00:40:43,160 --> 00:40:51,000
You know, shift in demand curves or shifts in supply curve, so you may see a shift in the demand curve if the population increases,

420
00:40:51,000 --> 00:41:01,000
or you may see entirely. Downward shift in the supply curve if there's like some brand new technology introduced into the market.

421
00:41:01,000 --> 00:41:04,320
So you're going to see all these shifts all over the place.

422
00:41:04,320 --> 00:41:12,600
And so in this chaotic world where we're seeing these data points moving all over the place,

423
00:41:12,600 --> 00:41:22,040
is there any way that we can parse out where exactly states are?

424
00:41:22,040 --> 00:41:31,200
In in the market and you know if they're potentially heading towards a competitive output.

425
00:41:31,200 --> 00:41:38,160
Or if they potentially are heading towards a, you know, a monopolistic output.

426
00:41:38,160 --> 00:41:47,120
So that's my big question is where are states now in say this dichotomy between monopolist and competitive?

427
00:41:47,120 --> 00:41:56,080
And you know, what's their trajectory? So that's my grand research question.

428
00:41:56,080 --> 00:42:01,520
And first steps first, we need to get the data.

429
00:42:01,520 --> 00:42:11,560
So I'll go ahead and share these scripts with you. And so this is essentially how I was beginning to get the data from.

430
00:42:11,560 --> 00:42:20,360
Illinois, so they have.

431
00:42:20,360 --> 00:42:30,560
Data here in PDFs. So you've got licensee data and you've got sales data.

432
00:42:30,560 --> 00:42:39,840
And. We just need a nice automated way to get this data out of these PDFs.

433
00:42:39,840 --> 00:42:48,120
So all you data scientists out there who use Python, I think you're going to love this tool.

434
00:42:48,120 --> 00:42:55,240
So I've been pretty excited about it myself, but it's PDF plumber.

435
00:42:55,240 --> 00:43:04,120
So they use a clever way to extract data from PDFs. Essentially, they just look at.

436
00:43:04,120 --> 00:43:14,120
Your PDF. And try to find any grid lines and then just return you the data as an array.

437
00:43:14,120 --> 00:43:22,960
So that way, instead of just trying to parse all the text and you know, trying to think about tabs and this and that.

438
00:43:22,960 --> 00:43:29,160
The you know, actually use the grid lines and return to you a nice array.

439
00:43:29,160 --> 00:43:38,200
So long story short. We can now automate the collection of the Illinois data here.

440
00:43:38,200 --> 00:43:42,400
So.

441
00:43:42,400 --> 00:43:47,200
Let's.

442
00:43:47,200 --> 00:44:04,080
See if we can't download this data here.

443
00:44:04,080 --> 00:44:13,040
OK, so long story short, we're just going to download this data as a PDF.

444
00:44:13,040 --> 00:44:18,880
Then we can read the data into an array.

445
00:44:18,880 --> 00:44:25,120
So that way we can begin the cleaning process.

446
00:44:25,120 --> 00:44:34,560
So just have. The giant 2D array here.

447
00:44:34,560 --> 00:44:47,560
And so we can. Use our own column names and just create a nice data frame of licensees.

448
00:44:47,560 --> 00:44:52,640
And so this is just retailers, however.

449
00:44:52,640 --> 00:44:57,880
This is good data so we can clean this up a bit.

450
00:44:57,880 --> 00:45:05,720
So then this can be refined a bit more, but this is essentially just parsing out.

451
00:45:05,720 --> 00:45:13,080
Street city, state zip code and phone number from.

452
00:45:13,080 --> 00:45:18,120
This block here.

453
00:45:18,120 --> 00:45:27,680
So now, you know, we know how many retailers there are in Illinois and.

454
00:45:27,680 --> 00:45:32,520
Graham and everyone else don't let me just get so fixated on certain states.

455
00:45:32,520 --> 00:45:39,600
So as Graham pointed out, we need to unlock this data here from Maryland.

456
00:45:39,600 --> 00:45:45,600
So perhaps this could be another good project is somehow trying to.

457
00:45:45,600 --> 00:45:48,240
To unlock this data.

458
00:45:48,240 --> 00:45:55,240
So, but for now. We've got. Retailer data in Illinois.

459
00:45:55,240 --> 00:46:06,120
We can also unlock the sales data.

460
00:46:06,120 --> 00:46:18,560
And once again, we read this as just a giant array of data, but will need to be cleaned up here.

461
00:46:18,560 --> 00:46:22,840
So simple enough.

462
00:46:22,840 --> 00:46:27,600
Once again, using our own column names.

463
00:46:27,600 --> 00:46:32,720
Using a bit of logic to determine the year and month.

464
00:46:32,720 --> 00:46:38,920
And then we've got a nice time series of data.

465
00:46:38,920 --> 00:46:44,720
Well, not yet. Still have a bit of cleaning to do.

466
00:46:44,720 --> 00:46:50,600
So basically. This these next few lines.

467
00:46:50,600 --> 00:46:58,720
Create a time index and then remove all of the extraneous values.

468
00:46:58,720 --> 00:47:07,320
So those can be removed and this this third block.

469
00:47:07,320 --> 00:47:15,080
Handles the dollar signs, because as you can see, we've read the data in with dollar signs and.

470
00:47:15,080 --> 00:47:19,720
Need to convert that to numeric values.

471
00:47:19,720 --> 00:47:24,200
This line of code simply just converts.

472
00:47:24,200 --> 00:47:31,720
The time index here. See how everything is indexed at the beginning of the month.

473
00:47:31,720 --> 00:47:37,680
My personal preference is just to index things at the end of the month.

474
00:47:37,680 --> 00:47:41,960
Because to me, that just makes more logical sense.

475
00:47:41,960 --> 00:47:46,600
So, for example, when you're talking about monthly sales, it just makes sense.

476
00:47:46,600 --> 00:47:49,920
Like, oh, that was the sales for the month.

477
00:47:49,920 --> 00:47:53,840
This is entirely my personal preference.

478
00:47:53,840 --> 00:47:58,120
But it makes a difference when you're doing the coding.

479
00:47:58,120 --> 00:48:11,560
Long story short, we now have the sales data nicely parsed for us.

480
00:48:11,560 --> 00:48:19,480
Awesome. And so we can begin to really calculate some interesting statistics here.

481
00:48:19,480 --> 00:48:26,840
That you don't see many people calculating and let alone.

482
00:48:26,840 --> 00:48:34,600
Showing you the methods, and that's what we believe a lot of the scientific process is all about, right?

483
00:48:34,600 --> 00:48:39,360
You're you're all about showing your methods about how you get your results.

484
00:48:39,360 --> 00:48:47,400
So we I personally believe, you know, if you're, you know, preparing statistics.

485
00:48:47,400 --> 00:49:00,000
And presenting people with data, you know, it's important to show your processes and, you know, be upfront about assumptions made along the way.

486
00:49:00,000 --> 00:49:09,560
Because as we we demonstrated, you know, there's a lot of cleaning that needs to be done along the way.

487
00:49:09,560 --> 00:49:13,920
So long story short, we can begin to look at some real cool statistics here.

488
00:49:13,920 --> 00:49:18,040
So we've got when the license were issued.

489
00:49:18,040 --> 00:49:26,640
So given when they're issued, we can get a count of how many retailers were operating over time.

490
00:49:26,640 --> 00:49:31,600
Because that's one of the dimensions we're interested in, right? We're interested in, right?

491
00:49:31,600 --> 00:49:42,880
Quantity and price, but we're also interested in time and the state as well.

492
00:49:42,880 --> 00:49:57,280
So we can basically get a nice count of the retailers over time.

493
00:49:57,280 --> 00:50:04,440
And this is sort of where I was starting to get into the the quantity restrictions.

494
00:50:04,440 --> 00:50:12,920
So in the in will compare Illinois to say Massachusetts and other states.

495
00:50:12,920 --> 00:50:22,160
But, you know, in all the states, you see this gradual increase of retailers and cultivators as, you know,

496
00:50:22,160 --> 00:50:28,320
people are coming online and setting up their shop and opening up shop.

497
00:50:28,320 --> 00:50:42,920
In Illinois, though, you just see this just this cap, you know, they they they, you know, they can't do believe they've allowed more more licensees into the market as of late.

498
00:50:42,920 --> 00:50:51,600
But, you know, the Illinois sort of, you know, one of the they were sort of famous for for capping their licenses.

499
00:50:51,600 --> 00:51:01,920
And so, you know, here you do just observe this, you know, cap and retailers at at one hundred and ten.

500
00:51:01,920 --> 00:51:07,040
And so that's sort of what I was talking about here.

501
00:51:07,040 --> 00:51:19,320
So I feel like, you know, that that cap is almost kind of tapping the potential quantity that could be produced.

502
00:51:19,320 --> 00:51:22,680
And so I don't think you're at QM per se. Right.

503
00:51:22,680 --> 00:51:26,320
Because there's one hundred and ten retailers.

504
00:51:26,320 --> 00:51:33,640
It's not a monopolist, which is one. But I don't feel that we're quite at QC.

505
00:51:33,640 --> 00:51:40,600
So long story short is I think it would be interesting, you know, to measure.

506
00:51:40,600 --> 00:51:53,440
You know, Illinois and maybe compare it to other states and try to conjecture, you know, what would be, you know, the competitive quantity and, you know, what would be competitive prices?

507
00:51:53,440 --> 00:51:56,680
Like if you let more people into the market.

508
00:51:56,680 --> 00:52:06,160
And like we said, we may not be able to just pinpoint what QC is, but, you know, a lot of what economics is about is marginal changes.

509
00:52:06,160 --> 00:52:17,600
So we could basically say, you know, what would be the effect of, you know, allowing one more retailer into the market be?

510
00:52:17,600 --> 00:52:26,400
So that's essentially what we're trying to uncover here is, you know, what would be the effect of allowing more people to operate in the market?

511
00:52:26,400 --> 00:52:29,800
Or at least that's sort of the question I'm after.

512
00:52:29,800 --> 00:52:36,640
And so a lot of this is or is or supporting statistics.

513
00:52:36,640 --> 00:52:44,960
So I'll just walk through these briefly. So basically just grabbing the population.

514
00:52:44,960 --> 00:52:50,000
And looking at retailers per capita.

515
00:52:50,000 --> 00:52:58,800
And so this is a nice standardized metric that you can use to compare state to state.

516
00:52:58,800 --> 00:53:02,160
So this is retailers per 100,000 people.

517
00:53:02,160 --> 00:53:07,720
So that way we can start to compare Illinois to other states.

518
00:53:07,720 --> 00:53:13,000
You know, controlling for factors such as population.

519
00:53:13,000 --> 00:53:24,840
And then, as we pointed out, we can begin to look at things like sales per retailer to try to get a measure of profitability.

520
00:53:24,840 --> 00:53:29,000
And. Join us.

521
00:53:29,000 --> 00:53:33,960
Oh, yes. And here's I just did a few monthly.

522
00:53:33,960 --> 00:53:37,240
I mean, a few annual statistics.

523
00:53:37,240 --> 00:53:43,520
So here we just looked at retailers per capita in 2020.

524
00:53:43,520 --> 00:53:48,800
And then sales per retailer in 2020.

525
00:53:48,800 --> 00:53:59,440
And then in 2021, you do see you do actually see a doubling in retailers per capita, of course.

526
00:53:59,440 --> 00:54:08,080
Although it doubled, it's the nominal value 0.82 is still quite low.

527
00:54:08,080 --> 00:54:16,560
And so, you know, so. So long story short, we're starting to get a couple of data points here

528
00:54:16,560 --> 00:54:24,120
about about the competitiveness in Illinois, but just scratching the surface.

529
00:54:24,120 --> 00:54:29,840
And so there's still a lot more to do. And so just going to go ahead and tease.

530
00:54:29,840 --> 00:54:37,440
Definitely recommend tuning in on Saturday because we've started to talk about instrumental variables

531
00:54:37,440 --> 00:54:50,000
and how we could potentially. Actually try to estimate movement along the demand curve, potentially,

532
00:54:50,000 --> 00:54:57,760
as people are allowed into the market. So that's what we're trying to measure.

533
00:54:57,760 --> 00:55:09,440
But, you know, just to kind of show you where we are.

534
00:55:09,440 --> 00:55:16,080
You know, we still are far from so. Right.

535
00:55:16,080 --> 00:55:24,760
We're we're trying to draw a nice supply and demand curve with price and quantity.

536
00:55:24,760 --> 00:55:31,000
And, you know, this is our best attempt at drawing a demand curve so far.

537
00:55:31,000 --> 00:55:39,880
And it's got a positive slope. So. You know, Ryan can attest that, you know.

538
00:55:39,880 --> 00:55:44,360
You know, a lot of demand insists that we have a negatively sloped demand curve here.

539
00:55:44,360 --> 00:55:54,680
So the long story short. Actually, I'm not even certain I'm measuring the thing I'm thinking I am.

540
00:55:54,680 --> 00:56:03,000
OK, I think I'm going to go ahead and pause it there because I think I just ran it.

541
00:56:03,000 --> 00:56:12,200
I don't think I ran the correct regression here. Yes, this is an entirely different regression.

542
00:56:12,200 --> 00:56:18,200
And so it's a part of me there. So long story short.

543
00:56:18,200 --> 00:56:22,760
As you can see, I'm still sort of in the exploratory stages.

544
00:56:22,760 --> 00:56:31,560
But, you know, we're starting to get scripts here that we can actually use to aggregate the data from Illinois.

545
00:56:31,560 --> 00:56:41,640
And then I'll share this script with you where we can aggregate data from Massachusetts' Cannabis Control Commission.

546
00:56:41,640 --> 00:56:51,000
And we'll keep at it. So I'm going to take a look at what we can do about Maryland data.

547
00:56:51,000 --> 00:56:59,160
And then if any of you want to contribute, then think of a good state and jump right in.

548
00:56:59,160 --> 00:57:06,440
And, you know, see if you can come up with a good collection scheme yourself.

549
00:57:06,440 --> 00:57:13,000
So that's where we are today. But any thoughts, questions, comments here?

550
00:57:13,000 --> 00:57:21,480
Mariana. Yeah, Keegan. Can we also look at Michigan recreational cannabis data?

551
00:57:21,480 --> 00:57:26,520
Michigan. Yeah. Right now, they don't have data sets.

552
00:57:26,520 --> 00:57:33,800
It's not as savvy as Massachusetts, the Cannabis Commission there.

553
00:57:33,800 --> 00:57:42,360
They mostly have PDFs. Yeah. But I've been looking at that.

554
00:57:42,360 --> 00:57:48,680
And their tables don't look as nicely set up as Illinois.

555
00:57:48,680 --> 00:57:55,320
OK. So we may have to be creative. So we'll see if we can't use PDF Plumber.

556
00:57:55,320 --> 00:58:03,240
And then we may have to find other tools in the toolbox. But yes, let's definitely look at Michigan.

557
00:58:03,240 --> 00:58:08,360
So there's a lot of action going on in Michigan.

558
00:58:08,360 --> 00:58:14,520
And I think we've only looked at it cursely before. So I'm happy to take a look at that.

559
00:58:14,520 --> 00:58:18,120
So let's go ahead and put that on the agenda for next week.

560
00:58:18,120 --> 00:58:23,400
So Michigan data and then Graham's mentioned Virginia data.

561
00:58:23,400 --> 00:58:31,240
So if anyone else has recommendations. I would love Michigan because I have to travel

562
00:58:31,240 --> 00:58:37,400
Michigan frequently. Oh, OK. And I've experienced their cannabis.

563
00:58:37,400 --> 00:58:41,400
There is a huge opportunity there. Absolutely.

564
00:58:41,400 --> 00:58:48,520
They grow grass. And by that, I mean stuff you feed cows, not stuff you want to use.

565
00:58:48,520 --> 00:58:54,920
No, and Graham, you bring up a great point. I think the problem here is quality control.

566
00:58:54,920 --> 00:59:03,640
Yeah. Just look at Oregon and Oklahoma. You do raise a good point.

567
00:59:03,640 --> 00:59:12,280
So all the states have different challenges. So I just heard anecdotally, just from what I've read,

568
00:59:12,280 --> 00:59:18,840
there's some heavy metal concerns. For example, in Oklahoma, right, there's

569
00:59:18,840 --> 00:59:26,200
a lot of heavy metals in the air. And that's something that you have to be watch out for.

570
00:59:26,200 --> 00:59:33,880
Because heavy metals are toxic to me. That's the disease. This is why I'm in this thing.

571
00:59:33,880 --> 00:59:41,240
Exactly. And this is a big concern I have. So, for example, we looked at residual solvents

572
00:59:41,240 --> 00:59:48,600
and concentrates. And it's just something that you're struck in accord with me that

573
00:59:48,600 --> 00:59:54,120
you're doing. And we've got a big group of talented data scientists here. So

574
00:59:55,080 --> 00:59:57,240
let's see what we can do and try to add some value.

575
00:59:59,960 --> 01:00:07,000
This is motivating me to kind of dive into New York. One, because I know it has heavy regulations.

576
01:00:07,000 --> 01:00:13,160
I think some of them are very much welcome, though. There's a big thing. I think it was

577
01:00:13,160 --> 01:00:20,680
vitamin E. I could be mixing that up. But that's been so prevalent in some other states. But New

578
01:00:20,680 --> 01:00:27,800
York regulations make sure that none of that went into the vaping products. Just recently,

579
01:00:28,520 --> 01:00:37,400
they got into actual green marijuana, but it is crushed up, unfortunately. And now we just legalize

580
01:00:37,400 --> 01:00:45,640
marijuana on a recreational level. So I'm just intrigued to dive in more to my state. And

581
01:00:46,680 --> 01:00:51,080
I kind of want to get some data now before the recreational stuff goes into play,

582
01:00:51,080 --> 01:00:55,400
so then I can see how the recreational marijuana affects the market.

583
01:00:58,280 --> 01:01:03,880
Exactly. And that's something that we love to put together at CanLytics is basically just a nice

584
01:01:03,880 --> 01:01:09,000
comparison of these regulations from state to state, because it's not apples to apples in all

585
01:01:09,000 --> 01:01:17,320
the states. The limits are different in all the states. The actual compounds they're testing for

586
01:01:17,320 --> 01:01:24,920
are different from state to state. So there's a lot of good standardization that can be done by

587
01:01:24,920 --> 01:01:32,360
a talented group of data scientists like ourselves. So you're going to say something, Graham?

588
01:01:32,360 --> 01:01:35,560
No, I'm sorry. I guess that was my bad.

589
01:01:36,680 --> 01:01:42,600
Yes. Well, until next week, let's just all keep our nose to the grindstone. And then Graham,

590
01:01:42,600 --> 01:01:48,840
Marjana, Ryan, Heather, Camilla, DP, if you make any discoveries along the way,

591
01:01:48,840 --> 01:01:55,960
feel free to reach out. And so, or if you have any questions about any of the work we've done,

592
01:01:55,960 --> 01:02:02,840
so let's try to make this a nice collaboration. And then on Saturday, we'll see if we can't

593
01:02:02,840 --> 01:02:07,320
find any interesting instrumental variables to parse out supply and demand a bit more.

594
01:02:08,120 --> 01:02:11,400
And then next Wednesday, we'll do a deep dive on Michigan.

595
01:02:12,600 --> 01:02:13,640
Sounds great. Thanks.

596
01:02:15,000 --> 01:02:20,600
Awesome. Thank you all for attending today. I hope you have an awesome, productive,

597
01:02:20,600 --> 01:02:27,320
and enjoyable week and a day today. So enjoy yourselves. See you. Bye.

598
01:02:28,120 --> 01:02:29,000
Bye now. Bye guys.

599
01:02:29,000 --> 01:02:49,640
Thank you. Take care.

